Potential Effects of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) on the Philippine Economy*

Similar documents
The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific

Appendix A Specification of the Global Recursive Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Model

The Relative Significance of EPAs in Asia-Pacific

Trans-Pacific Partnership

Economic Impact of Canada s Participation in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership

Division on Investment and Enterprise

Current Status and Challenges. May 14, Shujiro URATA Waseda University

Impacts on Global Trade and Income of Current Trade Disputes

Economic Impact of Canada s Potential Participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

U.S. Withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Effects of Alternative Trade Integration Scenarios in the Asia-Pacific *

Whither the ASEAN Economic Community in ?

Japan s New Trade Policy in Asia-Pacific

Economic and Distributional Impacts of Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership: The case of Vietnam

Welfare Changes and Sectoral Adjustments of Asia-Pacific Countries under Alternative Sequencings of Free Trade Agreements

RIETI Special Seminar. The New Landscape of World Trade with Mega-FTAs and Japan's Strategy. Handout. URATA Shujiro

Introduction to PHILIPPINES

The Evolving Role of Trade in Asia: Opening a New Chapter. Fall 2018 REO Background Paper

TPP11 Agreement in Principle: Japan s Role in Mega-regional Trade Agreements

Japan s FTA Strategy. August 7, Shujiro URATA Waseda University

Thailand and TPP 30 November 2012 Apiradi Tantraporn, Executive Chairperson The International Institute for Asia Pacific Studies (INSAPS), Bangkok

EU Trade Policy and CETA

Global Economic Management and Asia s Responsibility Masahiro Kawai Asian Development Bank Institute

Evaluating the Effects of Free Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific Region under Alternative Sequencings *

COUNTRY ECONOMIC INDICATORS (CAMBODIA)

Trans- Paci*ic Partnership

Re: Consulting Canadians on a possible Canada-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement

Charting Myanmar s Economy

Role of PTAs for Promoting MSMEs Integration in GVCs

RIETI Special Seminar. The New Landscape of World Trade with Mega-FTAs and Japan's Strategy. Handout. Peter A. PETRI

Event 1. Module 2. The Converging Strands Between Trade and Investment Session Two: The mega regionals, impacts for members and non-members

Economic Integration in South East Asia and the Impact on the EU

Harnessing Globalisation to Build a Better World for the Benefit of All. Yose Rizal Damuri Centre for Strategic and International Studies

OVERLOOKED FACTS ABOUT

Beyond Bali: prospects for multi- and plurilateral trade negotiations. by György Csáki Szent István University, Gödöllő - HUNGARY

Introduction to MALAYSIA

A way out of preferential deals OECD Global Forum on Trade 2014, February, OECD Conference Centre, Paris

ASEAN-Korea Economic Relationship:

FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS ANALYSIS

ASIA IN THE WORLD ECONOMY: THREE POLICY CHALLENGES

Impacts of East Asian Integration on Vietnam: A CGE Analysis

Japan-ASEAN Comprehensive Economic Partnership

WTO Accession and Domestic Reform: Vietnam s Trade Horizons to 2020

Parallel Session 7: Regional integration

Charting Brunei s Economy

AUSTRALIA S POLICIES TOWARDS PROTECTION AND FREE TRADE

Mega-Regional Trading Arrangements: TPP and TTIP - how China and other emerging economy react to the new rules governing the trade and investment?

Table 3: The Growth of Macro Economy in Asian Countries in 2005 and the estimation of 2006

Presented by S K Mohanty, Fellow, RIS

The report was declassified on the authority of the Secretary General of the OECD.

Competitiveness, impacts, and possible choices of Thailand in the framework of TPP

tariff global business nontariff barriers multinational corporation quota direct foreign investment trade barriers voluntary export restraints

Emergent Uncertainty in Regional Integration - Economic impacts of alternative RTA scenarios-

COUNTRY ECONOMIC INDICATORS. Table 1: Country Economic Indicators for Cambodia,

GASIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE 2015 INDONESIA-CURRENT OUTLOOK FOR FOREIGN INVESTMENT. Richard Cant-North American Director October 12 th, 2015

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. IPB dan UI TEAM

Charting Mexico s Economy

Legal Review of FTA Tariff Negotiations

PTA s INVESTMENT CHAPTER: THE JUXTOPOSITION OF THE INVESTMENT LIBERALISATION PROVISION

CGE Simulation of the ASEAN Economic Community and RCEP under Long-term Productivity Scenarios 1

BRIEFING ON The TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (TPPA)

2017 Asia and Pacific Regional Economic Outlook:

Session 1 : Economic Integration in Asia: Recent trends Session 2 : Winners and losers in economic integration: Discussion

Narrowing Development Gaps in ASEAN: Perspective from Lao PRD. Phouphet KYOPHILAVONG, Ph.D

Fiscal policy for inclusive growth in Asia

Shankaran Nambiar. Senior Research Fellow. Malaysian Institute of Economic Research. Malaysian Institute of Economic Research

Aask Advisory Services Pte. Ltd.

XIV. Trade and sectoral impacts of the global financial crisis a dynamic computable general equilibrium analysis

Reforming the IIA System: Investment Arbitration in Asia-Pacific and ASEAN

Introduction to VIETNAM

GLOBAL MOBILITY TRENDS IN ASIA

Current Status and Future Prospects of the TPP Negotiations

Economic Outlook and Risks in the APEC Region

Yen and Yuan. The Impact of Exchange Rate Fluctuations on the Asian Economies. C. H. Kwan RIETI

Presentation. Global Financial Crisis and the Asia-Pacific Economies: Lessons Learnt and Challenges Introduction of the Issues

Am Cham Vietnam Post-TPP Vietnam: Plan B?

The AEC and Taiwan-Indonesia Economic Partnership: A Taiwan Business perspective

Environmental Tax Reform for Low Carbon Green Growth: Major findings and policy implications from a multi-regional economic simulation analysis

Taking ASEAN+1 FTAs towards the RCEP

The ASEAN Economic Community 2015

Trade and Sectoral Impacts of the Global Financial Crisis: A Dynamic CGE Analysis

Japan growing with Asia's development - Asia-Pacific framework toward

Financing the MDG Gaps in the Asia-Pacific

Singapore 7 Jan 2013.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership:

EFTA FREE TRADE RELATIONS

Chikahisa Sumi Director, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific International Monetary Fund

World Economy: Prospects and Risks Masahiro Kawai Graduate School of Public Policy Univ. of Tokyo

FINANCE TO ENSURE ASIA S ECONOMIC GROWTH DR. RANEE JAYAMAHA CHAIRPERSON - HATTON NATIONAL BANK PLC

Why Corporate Governance is Important in APEC Economies

Role of RCI in Addressing Developing Asia s Long-term Challenges

Asia Bond Monitor November 2018

Rina Oktaviani Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia

Review of the Economy. E.1 Global trends. January 2014

Why do we need RCEP? Lili Yan Ing. The Establishment of the AEC and RCEP: Challenges and Opportunities Taipei, 29 July 2015

Taiwan and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): An Australian Perspective

World Consumer Income and Expenditure Patterns

Introduction of World Wealth and Income Database

Trade trends and trade policy developments. Ian Ascough Head of Bilateral Trade Negotiations BIS/DfID Trade Policy Unit

Elephants in a bazaar?

July 12, 2013 Hanoi,Vietnam

Transcription:

Potential Effects of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) on the Philippine Economy* Caesar B. Cororaton Presented at the Philippine Institute for Development Studies Quezon City, Metro Manila December 1, 2015 * Research funding provided by the Philippine Institute for Development Studies

Regional Trade Research Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Labor Mobility within the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC)

Background - RCEP November 2012 initial launch of RCEP negotiations RCEP recognizes ASEAN s centrality (ASEAN +6 ) RCEP: 3.4 billion people; total GDP US$ 21 trillion Items in the negotiation Elimination of tariff and non-tariff barriers on goods and services Facilitation of investment flows Technical cooperation Protection of intellectual property rights Promotion of competition Establishment of dispute settlement mechanism

Objective To estimate the potential effects of the reduction in RCEP tariffs and non-tariff barriers (NTBs) RCEP members (ASEAN +6 ) and non-members Detailed Philippine effects Sectoral output and commodity prices Factor returns Household income Poverty and income distribution

Background data

RCEP GDP and Population 2013 Population 2013 GDP million US$ billion* ASEAN Brunei 0.4 16.1 Cambodia 15.0 15.2 Indonesia 248.8 868.3 Lao 6.7 10.6 Malaysia 29.9 312.4 Myanmar 61.6 80.7 Philippines 97.4 272.1 Singapore 5.4 297.9 Thailand 66.8 416.1 Vietnam 89.7 171.2 +6 Australia 23.1 1,468.5 New Zealand 4.5 185.8 Japan 127.3 4,898.1 S. Korea 50.2 1,304.6 China 1,360.7 9,181.2 India 1,228.8 1,798.6 Total (ASEAN + 6) 3,416.4 21,297.5 Source: ADB Economic Indicators *Local currency converted to US$ using ave. forex; 2012 for Myanmar

Philippine Trading Partners M. Exports, 2010-2013 M. Imports, 2010-2013 Average, Average Average, Average Countries US $mil. Share,% Countries US $mil. Share,% Japan 9,507 18.5 USA 6,558 11.0 USA 7,474 14.5 European Union 6,363 10.6 European Union 6,363 12.4 China 6,357 10.6 China 6,178 12.0 Japan 6,229 10.4 Singapore 5,120 9.9 Singapore 4,680 7.8 Hong Kong 4,308 8.4 Taiwan 4,405 7.4 South Korea 2,622 5.1 South Korea 4,395 7.3 Thailand 2,018 3.9 Thailand 3,544 5.9 Taiwan 1,872 3.6 Indonesia 2,558 4.3 Malaysia 1,203 2.3 Malaysia 2,487 4.2 Indonesia 680 1.3 Hong Kong 1,436 2.4 Canada 451 0.9 Australia 1,058 1.8 Australia 485 0.9 Canada 451 0.8 New Zealand 44 0.1 New Zealand 466 0.8 Others 3,147 6.1 Others 8,863 14.8 Total 51,470 100.0 Total 59,847 100.0 % of GDP 22.9 % of GDP 26.6 RP exports to RCEP, % 54.0 RP imports from RCEP, % 53.1 Source: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas

EU NET FDI 2010 2111 2012 2013-1,411-292 369 61 Net FDI to the Philippines Total Percent 2009-2013 Distribution Total 4,462 100.0 United States 1,073 24.0 Japan 1,823 40.9 European Union 25-1,286-28.8 ASEAN /1/ 3 0.1 ANIEs /2/ 1,375 30.8 South Korea 49 1.1 Hong Kong 1,292 29.0 Taiwan 34 0.8 Others 1,473 33.0 /1/ Association of South East Asian Nations /2/ Asian Newly Industrializing Economies Source: Bangk Sentral ng Pilipinas

FDI Frontier 2006 Actual FDI Stock FDI Frontier ASEAN 420,025 648,178 Brunei 9,861 15,312 Cambodia 2,954 3,481 Indonesia 19,056 178,794 Lao 856 1,686 Malaysia 53,575 73,067 Myanmar 5,005 6,378 Philippines 17,120 57,364 Singapore 210,089 210,521 Thailand 68,068 101,180 Vietnam 33,451 36,395 Source: Petri, Plummer, and Zhai (2011)

Method of Analysis Estimate non-tariff barriers (NTBs) using gravity-border effect model Simulate reduction in RCEP tariffs and NTBs using Global CGE model (GTAP 8 database) - determine trade creation and diversion effects in RCEP and non-rcep Simulate changes in Philippine factor and commodity prices using poverty microsimulation (Family Income and Expenditure Survey) - determine poverty and distributional effects in the Philippines

Flow of Information from CGE to Microsimulation From Global CGE (Philippine results) Changes in factor prices Wages of skilled and unskilled labor Returns to capital Land rent Changes in commodity prices To 2012 Philippine social accounting matrix (SAM) to calculate Changes in household income in decile Changes in inflation at level of household decile Movement of skilled and unskilled labor across sectors (agri/non-agri) To Poverty Microsimulation to compute Changes in poverty indexes (P0=incidence; P1=gap; and P2=severity) Changes GINI coefficient

Simple Average Applied Tariff Rates, % Agriculture and Food Mining Manufacturing RCEP 18.5 4.2 6.8 ASEAN 9.1 4.4 7.2 +6 31.0 3.8 6.3 Rest of East Asia 3.6 1.8 2.1 North America Free Trade 7.4 1.3 3.4 European Union 25 13.3 1.1 2.6 Latin America 8.6 5 9.1 Africa 11.2 6.9 11.7 Rest of the world 10.8 4.7 6.6 Source: GTAP 8

Estimates of Average Ad Valorem Tariff Equivalent NTBs in RCEP, % 30 28.3 25 20 15 10 11.6 17.2 20.4 17.1 12 16.7 5 0 2.5

Model simulated for 10 years Simulations Baseline: 2014-2023 World Bank GDP projections United Nations population projections A pre-solved multifactor productivity in each country/region to ensure model replicates exactly real per capita GDP in the baseline RCEP Scenario change over 10 years 90 percent reduction in applied tariffs in RCEP 10 percent reduction in NTBs in RCEP region US$2.4 billion increase in FDI in the Philippines

Simulation Results

Regional effects, % change from the baseline 2014 2018 2023 RCEP Total exports 0.60 2.28 3.31 To RCEP 1.87 6.97 9.89 To outside RCEP -0.20-0.74-1.14 ASEAN Total exports 0.44 1.64 2.21 To RCEP 1.03 3.87 5.44 To outside RCEP -0.20-0.86-1.73 "+6" Total exports 0.65 2.49 3.68 To RCEP 2.26 8.51 12.27 To outside RCEP -0.20-0.71-1.00 Non-RCEP Total exports -0.02-0.09-0.14 To RCEP -0.26-1.03-1.53 To outside RCEP 0.02 0.10 0.18 Source: Author's calculations

6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Change in RCEP Net Exports, % change from baseline 2014 2023 ASEAN +6 2023 Share % Net -0.7 RCEP 4.8 14.0 nonrcep -1.6 86.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2014 2023-1.0-2.0

Philippine Sectoral Output Effects, % change from the baseline 2014 2023 2014 2023 Rice -0.91-4.26 Metal products -0.32 3.87 Wheat and all other cereals -0.07 0.45 Transport and machinery equip. 0.04 7.17 Sugar -0.22 1.13 Electronic equipment -0.42 0.91 Milk -0.24 2.79 All other manufacturing -0.33 2.36 Oils fats -0.42 0.57 Utilities -0.01 3.38 Meat 0.14 2.44 Construction 2.13 11.21 All other agriculture 0.03 1.41 Trade 0.04 3.46 Mining -0.23 4.30 Transportation 0.14 4.14 All other food 0.07 3.18 Communications -0.02 3.43 Textile -0.83-1.28 Finance business services -0.11 3.22 Wearing apparel -0.16 2.65 Other services 0.02 4.04 Petroleum and chemical prod. -0.27 2.55 Public administration 0.01 0.72 Source: Author's calculations Change in import volume 2014 2023 Change in import price 2014 2023 Rice 5.77 33.15 Rice -2.95-14.07 Textile 0.75 6.65 Textile -0.66-2.02 Change in consumption price Change in consumption price Rice -0.78-4.11 Textile -0.43-0.93

Rice Consumption in the Philippines 2003 2009 2003 2009 Poor Non-Poor Total Food /a/ 62.6 52.0 47.7 43.0 Cereals /b/ 27.0 25.7 12.8 13.1 Rice /c/ 22.5 11.3 Source: 2003 and 2009 FIES /a/ Percent of total consumption /b/ Includes rice and corn /c/ 2009 FIES cereals were disaggregated into rice corn, and other cereal products

Factor Returns Effects in the Philippines % change from baseline 2014 2023 Skilled wages 0.88 3.88 Unskilled wages 0.95 3.80 Returns to capital 0.77-0.74 Returns to land 0.60 5.69 Source: Author's calculations

Real Household Income Effects in the Philippines % change from baseline Households (Decile) 2014 2023 H1 0.258 5.129 H2 0.125 4.333 H3 0.133 4.404 H4 0.125 4.355 H5 0.126 4.295 H6 0.121 4.273 H7 0.164 4.312 H8 0.183 4.372 H9 0.155 4.269 H10 0.101 4.329 Source: Author's calculations

Poverty Effects in the Philippines End of Simulation Period: 2023 2012 Index (%) Change from 2012 Philippines P0 24.85 23.29-6.26 P1 6.84 6.26-8.39 P2 2.68 2.42-9.76 Urban P0 11.57 10.77-6.94 P1 2.79 2.51-10.01 P2 0.99 0.88-11.4 Rural P0 35.58 33.42-6.09 P1 10.1 9.29-8.03 P2 4.04 3.66-9.44 Source: Author's calculations. P0=Incidence; P1=Gap; P2 = Severity

Observations and Insights RCEP exports improve; non-rcep exports decline Growth: Exports "+6" > Exports ASEAN Philippine export growth 3 rd in ASEAN (after Vietnam and Indonesia) Philippine sectors grow, except rice and textile. High growth sectors: construction; transport & machinery equipment; services Higher imports of cheaper rice and textile to benefit Filipinos and garments sector Higher factor prices: wages and land rent. Favor lower income groups Commodity prices decline. Higher real household income, esp. low income groups Poverty indicators down; GINI coefficient decline RCEP generates US$4.5 billion additional welfare for Philippines in 10 years

Thank you!