Master Class Investment Arbitration

Similar documents
Principles of International Investment Law

COMMERCIAL ADVISORY & CONTRACTS

Columbia Law School Spring Thursdays, 6:20 p.m. 8:10 p.m. (Room TBA) Two credits

International Commercial Arbitration Autumn 2013 Lecture II

Arbitration Provisions in M&A Transaction Documents

Current Issues in International Commercial and Investment Arbitration

The Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of the Republic of Belarus, hereinafter referred to as "the Contracting Parties,"

CASE STUDY: INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICE IN TURKEY by BENNAR AYDOĞDU 1

10th Anniversary Edition The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. Myanmar

I. The OIC Agreement. On the subject of the OIC Agreement, the article deals with the two following headings:

CURRENT COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PRACTICE AND DEVELOPMENTS IN KENYA AND EAST AFRICA

Bilateral Investment Treaty between Jordan and China

International Arbitration: A Key Protection for Foreign Investments

AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUSTRALIA AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC ON THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

Bilateral Investment Treaty between Benin and China

Select Can foreign investors sue the UK for Brexit? Markus Burgstaller. 4 October 2017

Bilateral Investment Treaty between Lebanon and Malaysia

Bilateral Investment Treaty between Korea and Brunei

(Beijing, 9.XI.2006) Article 1. Definitions

Volume 2234,

LAUNCHING YOUR ARBITRATION

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SULTANATE OF OMAN AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA

Bilateral Investment Treaty Agreement between Djibouti and China

TRAINING COURSE ON MANAGING INVESTMENT DISPUTES FOR LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES Montevideo, Uruguay, November 2007 COURSE PROSPECTUS

The Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of the Hellenic Republic, hereinafter referred to as the "Contracting Parties",

The Government of the Republic of Guatemala and the Government of the Russian Federation, hereinafter referred to as the Contracting Parties,

(Copenhagen, 4.XI.1993)

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC AND THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES ON THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BELGO-LUXEMBOURG ECONOMIC UNION, on the one hand, AND THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA, on the other hand,

Bilateral Investment Treaty between Mexico and China

DESIRING to intensify the economic cooperation for the mutual benefit of the Contracting Parties;

AGREEMENT ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS BETWEEN THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN AND THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA AND GEORGIA THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA FOR

Prevention & Management of ISDS

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BELGO-LUXEMBURG ECONOMIC UNION, ON

Bilateral Investment Treaty between Austria and Philippines

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE LEBANESE REPUBLIC AND THE BELGO-LUXEMBOURG ECONOMIC UNION

Role of the State on Protecting the System of Arbitration

Comparison between SCC arbitration and CIETAC arbitration

Mediation in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: still parallel Worlds?

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF CHILE AND THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA FOR THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENT

THE CCMA GUIDELINES ON ARBITRATION IN MISCONDUCT DISMISSALS 1 JUNE 2012

Bilateral Investment Treaty between Bulgaria and Thailand

Bilateral Investment Treaty Agreement between Uganda and China

AGREEMENT between the Republic of Austria and the Republic of Macedonia on the Promotion and Protection of Investments

International Investment Agreements: Strategies and Content

Bilateral Investment Treaty between Lebanon and China

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY AND THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA FOR THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

AGREEMENT ON THE MUTUAL PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF INVESTMENTS BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY AND THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA

the Swiss Federal Council and the Government of the State of Qatar on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments

European Parliament resolution of 6 April 2011 on the future European international investment policy (2010/2203(INI))

International Dispute Resolution and Arbitration in the Oil & Gas Industry

Euro-Arab Conference on Investor-State Dispute Settlement, October 2012

The Government of the Republic of Korea and the Government of the Republic of Costa Rica (hereinafter referred to as the "Contracting Parties"),

Introductory Level Training Programme INTRODUCTION TO DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION

The Government of the Republic of Croatia and the Government of Romania hereinafter referred to as the Contracting Parties,

Bilateral Investment Treaty between India and Nepal

THE BELGIAN-LUXEMBOURG ECONOMIC UNION

RESOLVING COMPLEX INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES USE OF THE ENGLISH JURISDICTION FOR EFFECTIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Andrew Manning Cox

AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUSTRALIA AND THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND ON THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

In the matter of an arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. between

The Government of the People s Republic of China and the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands,

Bilateral Investment Treaty between Saudi Arabia and Malaysia

THE INVESTMENT PROMOTION ACT

Teaching staff María Isabel Rodríguez Vargas & José Ángel Rueda García / Raquel Mendieta

ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS

The Government of the Republic of Croatia and the Government of the Argentine Republic, hereinafter referred to as the "Contracting parties",

The Government of the Republic of Chile and the Government of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Contracting Parties),

Legal Business. Arbitration As A Method Of Dispute Resolution

The Government of the Republic of Korea and the Government of the Republic of Nicaragua (hereinafter referred to as the "Contracting Parties"),

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND FOR THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

Party Autonomy and Choice of Law

International. Reflections On Professor Coe s Article On Investor-State Conciliation

The Government of the Republic of Chile and the Government of the Republic of Finland,

AGREEMENT between the Republic of Austria and the Republic of Cuba for the Promotion and Protection of Investments

Signed at Almaty March 20, 1996 Entered into force December 26, 1996

Investment Treaty Arbitration Kenya. Rahim Moloo and Yamini Grema. g ar know-how

Bilateral Investment Treaty between Korea and Malaysia

SCHEDULE (regulation 2)

Agreement between. the Government of the Republic of Finland. and. the Government of the Republic of Nicaragua

The Government of the Republic of Korea and the Government of the Kingdom of Cambodia (hereinafter referred to as "the Contracting Parties"),

A G R E E M E N T BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY AND THE REPUBLIC OF YEMEN FOR THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

10th Anniversary Edition The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. Kazakhstan

AGREEMENT BETWEEN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AND THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC FOR THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

CURRICULUM VITAE. Professor, University of Bucharest, Faculty of Law, Private Law Department

Volume 2238, Article 1. Definitions

International sale of goods and arbitration in Europe

Bilateral Agreements for the Promotion and Protection of Investments between Cambodia and Malaysia

Public consultation on modalities for investment protection and ISDS in TTIP

Miryan Weichselbaum-Gharibo

Article 1. The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Government of Romania, (hereinafter referred to as "the Contracting Parties")

One Belt One Road and Investment Treaty Disputes

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA AND THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC FOR THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

Treaty. between. the Federal Republic of Germany. and... concerning. the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection. of Investments

ARTICLE 16 DURATION AND TERMINATION

Arbitration in Hong Kong Latest Trends and Developments

ClientBrief. International Litigation & Arbitration Practice

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF LEBANON AND THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN ON THE RECIPROCAL ENCOURAGEMENT AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

Scandinavian PIDA Seminar on International Commercial Arbitration

Transcription:

The Brussels Diplomatic Academy and the Association for International Arbitration (AIA) kindly invite you to Master Class Investment Arbitration The law on foreign investment protection is one of the fastest developing and intellectually challenging branches of international law with high practical relevance. Investment arbitration is predicted to be a major factor in the development of the global economic system. The number of investment disputes before international arbitral tribunals has increased significantly over the last decades and reflects the notable preferences of the international business community for resolving international investment disputes. Acquaintance with the legal regime for investment arbitration and case law has now become indispensable for anyone seeking to have a full picture of arbitration or enhance his knowledge in international dispute resolution domain. In the course of the seminar, we will examine the fundamental notions relevant to investment arbitration and critically review a number of major cases. This seminar is especially relevant to government officials, diplomats, private investors and executives who are involved in investment decision-making processes. AUDIENCE The master class is aimed at: diplomats government officials responsible for negotiations of investment treaties and involved in representing a state in dispute resolution proceedings 1

attorneys specializing in dispute resolution civil servants in state s investment policies investors in all kind of businesses other ADDED VALUE The four days seminar is designed to provide its participants with a concentrated educational experience in the areas of law on foreign investment protection and investment arbitration. It is specifically aimed to provide practical help to those who wishes to grasp the fundamentals of investment arbitration. The course also offers an explanation of legal rules and relevant guidelines as well as checklists and practice examples. The course s unique feature is its international scope. Participants from a broad range of backgrounds will participate in a dynamic learning experience, where the multifaceted aspects of arbitration are considered from a range of comparative perspectives. CONTENTS Day 1: Introduction to Investor-State Arbitration A definition of investor-state arbitration and how it differs from international commercial arbitration The origins and sources of investor-state arbitration. The role of diplomatic protection in investment disputes. Drawbacks and advantages of diplomatic protection Consent to arbitration: by direct agreement, through host state legislation, through bilateral and multilateral investment treaties. Typical dispute settlement provisions The purpose and main content of an investment treaty. The rights protected by investment treaties and exceptions to protections accorded by investment treaties Main principles of interpretation and application of investment treaties Investment contracts in a nutshell: types, applicable law, stabilization clauses, and renegotiation/adaptation Arbitration institutions and regimes: ICSID and non-icsid investment arbitration The process of filing a claim under investment treaties: who can file and where such dispute can be filed A home state and host state of an investor: whether an investor may arbitrate against his home state in investor-state arbitration? A relief available in investor-state arbitration: restitution and satisfaction; damages; compensation for expropriation; interests 2

Day 2: Standards of Protection in International Investment Agreements Standard of Fair and equitable treatment. What are the specific applications of the standard? Full protection and security The umbrella clause. Meaning and origin. Effective and restrictive application Access to justice, fair procedure, and denial of justice The options available to a national investor to protect his property against the adverse measures of the home state. Do foreign investors have a greater degree of protection than nationals? National treatment standard Most-favoured-nation treatment Day 3: Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Investor-State Arbitration. Types of Jurisdictional Objections The pillars of arbitral tribunal s jurisdiction in ICSID cases. How do they differ in non-icsid cases? The difference between jurisdiction and admissibility. What claims are inadmissible in investor-state arbitration? A cooling off period in investor-state arbitration, its purpose and duration. How is it triggered? Exhaustion of local remedies in investor-state arbitration. A fork-in-the-road clause A temporality requirement under investment protection treaties What constitutes an investment in investor-state arbitration: what are the criteria, if any, to distinguish the investment from non-investment? Whether such criteria differ between ICSID and non-icsid cases? Can a sale of goods contract be considered an investment? The notion of an investor in investor-state arbitration. Are there any limitations on investors? Can a natural person be an investor? Whether a legal entity established according to the laws of the host state but owned by a foreign investor can be the claimant in investor-state arbitration? An objective and scope of summary dismissal in ICSID arbitration. Is this procedure available in non-icsid cases? The test applied by arbitral tribunals in the summary dismissal. Whether the threshold is set high for summary dismissal? Day 4: Annulment and Enforcement of Awards Main features of the annulment process under the ICSID Convention. What is the difference between annulment and appeal Main features of the annulment process in non-icsid proceedings. The importance of the place of arbitration in a non-icsid case The schemes for enforcement of arbitral awards under the ICSID Convention and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Sovereign immunity in enforcement proceedings 3

FACULTY Johan Billiet, Billiet&Co Lawyers, Association for International Arbitration IVZW Johan Billiet is a founding partner at Billiet & Co, Brussels. He is also the founder and President of the Association for International Arbitration (AIA IVZW). Johan Billiet is registered at both the Brussels and Paris bar (directive 98/5/EC) and has acted as Deputy Judge at the Court of First Instance in Brussels since 1981. Johan is frequently appointed to act as an arbitrator in all types of national and international arbitration procedures. Today he also teaches alternative dispute resolution, investment arbitration and comparative arbitration at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and at the European Mediation Training for Practitioners of Justice (EMTPJ) as well as at other ADR training providers. Tatiana Proshkina, Association for International Arbitration IVZW Tatiana specialises in international arbitration and manages projects on arbitration at the Association for International Arbitration (AIA IVZW). Tatiana is qualified to practice law in Russia, where she obtained her Specialist Degree in Law from the Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow. She also holds an LL.M. in International Commercial Arbitration Law from Stockholm University and a Certificate in International and European Law from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. Prior to joining AIA, Tatiana assisted in proceedings conducted under the ICC, ICSID and UNCITRAL Rules at the Paris based boutique law firm with a particular focus on international arbitration. LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of the course, the participants should be able to: Understand the legal framework of international arbitration law relating to foreign investments and the major rules on interpretation of investment treaties. Understand the main standards of protection in international investment agreements and major jurisdictional objections; be able to explain main notions in investment arbitration such as investor and investment. Comprehend the main features of annulment proceedings and the schemes for enforcement of arbitral awards under the ICSID Convention and the New York Convention. Become familiar with the most important case law in investment arbitration field and learn how to search efficiently for relevant jurisprudence. The working language of the course is English. COURSE MATERIAL Before the start of the lecture, a syllabus compiled by the lecturers will be handed over to the participants. For those who wish to enjoy some preparatory readings, the following texts are recommended: 4

Dolzer and Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law, 2012 Redfern and Hunter, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, 2009, Chapter 8 Lew, Mistelis, and Kröll, Comparative International Arbitration, 2003, Chapter 28 Newcombe and Paradell, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties, 2009 CERTIFICATION Participants to the course will receive a certificate of attendance from the Brussels Diplomatic Academy of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Examination is not compulsory. Participants to the course who opt for the examination, will be offered a certificate from the Brussels Diplomatic Academy of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, signed by the Rector. Request for bar points has been submitted. TIMING AND LOCATION Dates: This is a 4 days-course which takes place on 1-2 September and 8-9 September 2014, from 13.30 to 17.30. Location: Room Bruges Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 5, Karel Van Miert Building, 1050 Brussels. It is building number 5 on the campus plan that can be downloaded at http://www.vub.ac.be/english/infoabout/campuses/etterbeek.html. A description on how to find the campus is available on http://www.vub.ac.be/english/infoabout/campuses/index.html#etterbeek. Free parking facilities are available on the campus in front of the building. A bar code gives access to the campus via campus entries 6 or 13 (see the red arrows on the campus plan). The scanner for the bar code is situated under the intercom. A few days before the start of the event, participants will receive a bar code giving access to the parking. METHOD OF PAYMENT AND CANCELLATION Fees: The master class fee is 1.850 EUR. VAT Settlement: exempted from VAT: Art 44 2, 4 of the VAT code. 5

The above prices include the registration fee and all material relating to the course on Investment Arbitration, as well as the coffee breaks and networking reception for the duration of the event. The accommodation form is not included in the registration fees. Flemish companies can make use of the KMO-portefeuille : www.beaweb.be (Admission number BDA for Training : DV.O211124). Payment: Attendees are requested to pay by bank transfer only, upon receipt of invoice. Bank transfer details: Confirmation of registration and practical information will be sent only after receipt of payment. Cancellations: Cancellations can only be accepted if received in writing to bda@vub.ac.be by 18 August 2014. Fees (less 25 euro administrative charges) will then be refunded. After this date, delegates will be liable for the full fee. In case of cancellation, a substitution between members of the same company is still possible at any time. REGISTRATION To register for this master class, please fill in the online registration form available on www.brusselsdiplomaticacademy.be. For more information please contact us at bda@vub.ac.be. 6

7