QIAGEN Remuneration Report

Similar documents
As approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders on 3 May, 2013

Remuneration. Benchmarking with industry peers. Total direct compensation. The objective of X5 s remuneration policy is twofold:

Benchmark. Base salary 2012 Base salary 2013 Base salary 2014

HSBC Holdings plc. Directors Remuneration Policy Supplement 2017

Draft Subject to AGM approval

2014 Remuneration report

HYDRO ONE S PROPOSED NEW COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK

Lessons learnt in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis of Financial Services Remuneration

Compensation of Executive Board Members in European Health Care Companies. HCM Health Care

Compensation in 2017 Looking forward on long-term incentives

2016 Directors Remuneration Policy. (Approved at 2016 Annual General Meeting)

FirstGroup plc. Directors remuneration policy

Compensation Report ANNUAL REPORT

Remuneration policy for the Board of Management of Fugro N.V. as of 1 January 2017

LUXFER HOLDINGS PLC. Remuneration Policy Report

Remuneration Report 2016

Our governance. The remuneration policy. Policy report. Variable pay performance metrics. Holding period for LTIP awards

Directors remuneration policy

Danske Bank Group's Remuneration Policy, March 2018

Remuneration Policy. The Policy in the following pages sets out the Executive incentive arrangements applicable from 27 April 2015 onwards.

REMUNERATION POLICY LEADERS IN POLISH PROPERTY. 8 December 2017 Extraordinary General Meeting Materials/Remuneration Policy

Bonus deferral. Annual bonus

Remuneration. Bill McEwan Chairman of the Remuneration Committee of the Supervisory Board

Compensation. Introduction

Directors Remuneration Report continued

Remuneration Report 2017

WEST KIRKLAND MINING INC. (the Company ) STATEMENT OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

BASE PAY. Directors remuneration report continued. Directors remuneration policy. Directors remuneration policy

Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) 2017 Remuneration Disclosure ING Bank N.V.

Remuneration Report 2017

REMUNERATION REPORT 2016/17

REMUNERATION REPORT REMUNERATION REPORT

Directors Remuneration Report

Remuneration Report: Remuneration Policy

Remuneration report. Remuneration policy. for the year ended 31 March 2017

PATHEON N.V. Remuneration Policy

State Street Global Advisors GmbH Remuneration Disclosure. As of December 31, 2014 According to Section 16 (2) InstitutsVergV

Setting new remuneration policy for continued performance delivery

Remuneration Report For the year ended 31 March 2014

Base salary. Annual Incentive Plan. Long-Term Incentive Plan INTRODUCTION PART A: DIRECTORS REMUNERATION POLICY GENERAL POLICY. Corporate governance

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Brunel International N.V. Remuneration Report 2017

Compensation. Remuneration governance

Citigroup Pty Limited (CPL) APS 330 Remuneration Disclosure - 31 st December, 2017

No individual is included in decisions regarding his or her own remuneration.

COMPENSATION REPORT. The graph below shows the five year history of annual and cumulative growth, the CAGR being 50%.

REMUNERATION REPORT 2015/16

Remuneration policy in Danske Invest Management Company.

REMUNERATION POLICY DIRECTORS

NOTICE OF 2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT

Remuneration Committee annual statement. Role of the Remuneration Committee

REMUNERATION REPORT INTRODUCTION. Executive employee contracts REMUNERATION STRUCTURE MEMBERS COMMITTEE MEETINGS

STATE STREET BANQUE S.A. Remuneration Disclosure Report on Remuneration Policies and Practices for Fiscal Year 2016 STATE STREET BANQUE SA 1

Compensation. Board of Directors. Compensation of the Board of Directors in 2015

Directors Remuneration Policy

Executive Compensation in Privately Owned Businesses: How It s the Same and How It s Very Different

Directors Remuneration Policy

Remuneration Policy Report

Remuneration report. 1 Objectives of DBS remuneration strategy. 2 Summary of current total compensation elements. Fixed pay Variable pay Variable pay

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

1. Introduction. 2.1 Consideration of employment conditions elsewhere in the Company. 2.2 Statement of consideration of shareholder views

Part 2: Remuneration Policy

Driving Performance - Linking Equity Compensation Design with FAS 123(R) Valuation, Jeff Bacher and Terry Adamson, Aon Consulting

STANDARD FORM OF ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION OF THE DIRECTORS OF LISTED CORPORATIONS

REMUNERATION REPORT Remuneration of the Board of Management

Directors Compensation Policy Approved by 91.71% of shareholders on 7 June 2017

A review may not necessarily result in an increase in base salary. Salary levels for the current Executive Directors for the 2017 financial year are:

Report of the OMERS Administration Corporation Board Human Resources Committee

Executive and Board Remuneration in Finland

TISO BLACKSTAR GROUP SE (TBG) REMUNERATION POLICY APPROVED BY THE TBG REMUNERATION COMMITTEE

CITIGROUP PTY LIMITED (CPL) - APS 330 REMUNERATION DISCLOSURE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2016

REMUNERATION AND INCENTIVE POLICY

AGM Notes to the Agenda

No individual is included in decisions regarding his or her own remuneration.

Remuneration report. Corporate Governance Report of the Executive Board. ING Group Annual Report 2014

New compensation system for the members of the Management Board as of January 2017

TGS Declaration on Executive Remuneration. From the Compensation Committee

104 Swiss Re 2013 Financial Report

Remuneration Report 2010

Pillar 3 Annual Remuneration Disclosures

Ordinance No. 4. of 21 December 2010 on the Requirements for Remunerations in Banks. Subject. Scope. Remuneration Policy. Ordinance No.

Basel III Pillar 3 UK Annual Remuneration disclosures. March 2015

REMUNERATION POLICY FOR BANCO POPULAR DIRECTORS

Remuneration Report: Remuneration Policy this is a comparison between the 2014 and 2015 reports to assist shareholders

Into focus. FTSE 350 Executive and Board remuneration report. January 2016

Wells Fargo Asset Management Luxembourg S.A. Société anonyme 19, rue de Bitbourg L-1273 Luxembourg R.C.S. Luxembourg B192268

Directors remuneration report. Statement by Chair of the Remuneration Committee

Directors remuneration policy

B A SE L III P IL L A R 3 A NNUA L RE MUNE R AT ION DIS C LO S URE S A S AT 3 0 J UNE 2016

Savills plc Our Governance. Remuneration Report

4.3 Remuneration report

Part 1: Policy Report

Remuneration report for the financial year 2012 Wereldhave N.V. March 1, 2013

Remuneration Report 42

Directors remuneration report

ENMAX CORPORATION 2017 REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. As of December 31, 2017

ICANN COMPENSATION JULY 2011

Executive Compensation Compensation Discussion and Analysis

1. Introduction. 2. Period of validity

LTIP (long-term employee benefits and share-based payments according to IAS 24.17)

Transcription:

QIAGEN Remuneration Report Sample to Insight

Remuneration Report We are pleased to present our Remuneration Report for the financial year 2017. This report builds on the Remuneration Policy which was updated in 2014 and adopted by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders. The changes made were designed to further optimize the alignment of the remuneration of the Managing Board with long-term shareholder interests and to reflect changes to market trends, best practices and benchmarks. Remuneration Policy The objective of the Remuneration Policy is to attract, retain and reward the most talented, qualified leaders and experts and thereby to enable QIAGEN to achieve its strategic initiatives and operational excellence. The Remuneration Policy aligns remuneration to reward individual performance as well as the overall performance of QIAGEN, and to foster sustainable growth and value creation. The Remuneration Policy is based on a group of principles: Aligned with business strategy and stakeholder interests Measured against specific corporate performance metrics Supported by a pay for performance culture that rewards sustainable results Competitive in comparison to remuneration offered by relevant peers Consistent, fair and transparent Tailored to QIAGEN s risk profile Ensures social responsibility Compliant with regulatory standards and legal requirements as well as customs Market Competitiveness The Remuneration Policy and overall remuneration levels offered by QIAGEN are benchmarked regularly against a select peer group of companies in key markets in which QIAGEN operates to ensure overall competitiveness. QIAGEN participates in various compensation benchmarking surveys in which companies provide information on the level, as well as the structure, of compensation awarded for a broad range of positions around the world. QIAGEN has established a peer group of companies for its own benchmarking. These companies have been selected on the basis of their market capitalization, direct competition for talent, similar complexity and international activities, and presence in similar industries. Due to the international scope of QIAGEN s activities, this peer group consists of both European and U.S.-based companies, providing a balanced mix in the Life Sciences, Diagnostic and Pharmaceutical industries and designed to mitigate the risk of inadvertently losing employees. Remuneration Report 2

Benchmarking peer companies EUROPE UNITED STATES Diasorin Abbott Labs Genomic Health Quest Diagnostics Merck KgaA Agilent Hologic Quidel Group Mettler Toledo Becton Dickinson IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. Thermo Fisher Scientific Novozymes BioMerieux Illumina, Inc. VWR Sartorius Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. LabCorp Waters Corporation Sirona Bruker Meridian Bioscience Stratec Biomedical AG Charles River Laboratories Myriad Genetics Foundation Medicine, Inc. PerkinElmer QIAGEN aims for total direct compensation levels to be at the market median levels for comparable positions in the relevant markets, and as benchmarked against the peer group. In 2017, QIAGEN hired the independent compensation consulting firm Radford, an AON Hewitt Company, to review and benchmark the Remuneration Policy and compensation levels against relevant markets and peer group companies. QIAGEN s policies were generally seen to be well designed, and various proposals were made to further develop remuneration systems. Supervisory Board Evaluation The Supervisory Board evaluates the Remuneration Policy on a routine basis to review its efficiency and effectiveness in supporting QIAGEN s long-term strategy compared to relevant market practices and makes adjustments if and where appropriate. On an annual basis, the Supervisory Board sets the performance targets for the members of the Managing Board, reviews their performance against these predetermined targets and determines the remuneration and benefits in line with contractual terms. The Supervisory Board ensures that the remuneration of the Managing Board members incentivizes the right behaviors desired for the sustainable success of QIAGEN while also providing the members with fair and attractive remuneration packages. Furthermore, the Supervisory Board performs an analysis of the possible outcomes of the variable remuneration components and how they may affect remuneration of the Managing Board members. Through its statutory power, the Supervisory Board has the right to adjust the remuneration packages of the members of the Managing Board when it decides that this is appropriate, and that such actions would safeguard business continuity and would be in the best interests of all stakeholders. The Compensation Committee advises the Supervisory Board and prepares resolutions with respect to the review and execution of the Remuneration Policy as adopted by the General Meeting of Shareholders on June 25, 2014. In case of policy changes, the Supervisory Board submits the proposals to the General Meeting of Shareholders for adoption. Remuneration Report 3

Managing Board Remuneration Remuneration of Managing Board members consists of a combination of base salary, short-term variable cash award and elements of long-term incentives. In addition, the members of the Managing Board can receive pension arrangements and other benefits in line with market practices. The total target remuneration package of the Managing Board members is appropriately set with consideration of a variety of factors that include external benchmarks and the Individual s experience as well as the complexity of the position, scope and areas of responsibilities. QIAGEN aims to provide the members of the Managing Board with total direct compensation at a median level with market benchmarks. The structure of the remuneration package for the Managing Board members is designed to balance incentives for shortterm operational performance with incentives for long-term sustainable value creation while taking into account the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders. This means that a significant portion of total remuneration consists of variable awards, which can differ substantially from year to year and depend on the achievement of corporate goals as well as individual performance. The Remuneration Policy for the Managing Board is generally aligned and consistent with the framework for remuneration of other senior managers of QIAGEN. The various elements of the remuneration package are set out in more detail below. Base Salary QIAGEN aims to provide a base salary at market median level to members of its Managing Board. Base salary levels are reviewed annually against overall market trends and benchmarks from a selected group of companies. Adjustments can also be made by the Supervisory Board to compensate for inflation as well as changes in roles and responsibilities. Variable Remuneration To ensure that remuneration is linked to performance, a significant portion of remuneration to the members of the Managing Board is variable and contingent upon the performance of the individual and the Company. These goals are set annually at ambitious levels to motivate and drive performance, with a focus on achieving both long-term strategic initiatives as well as short-term objectives based on annual operational plans. Variable remuneration consists of a short-term variable cash award and long-term incentive awards. Failure to achieve certain threshold levels of performance results in no payout being made for short-term incentives and reduced outcomes for long-term incentives. The performance assessment of the Managing Board as a whole can extend beyond the date that variable remuneration awards are made and can continue as part of a multi-year framework. In this way, a longer-term horizon is established to ensure that variable remuneration continues to remain at risk and that Managing Board members remain fully aligned with the interest of shareholders and other stakeholders. Remuneration Report 4

Short-Term Incentives Short-term incentives consist of an annual variable cash bonus award that is based upon the achievement of predetermined annual targets. This award has two components: (a) overall financial performance (weighted at 75%) and (b) the individual s performance (weighted at 25%). The overall financial performance is based on both corporate financial as well as defined operational or strategic milestones (called Team Goals ) which are shared by all employees. The financial goals include elements related to short-term financial results that include net sales, operating income and free cash flow. The Team Goals are a set of annual cross-functional goals aimed at achieving QIAGEN s strategy focused on innovation and sustainable value creation with an emphasis on increasing growth, efficiency, engagement and improving customer experience. QIAGEN does not disclose the quantitative and specific targets since these are considered to be sensitive information. However, we have outlined below the target areas and their weightings. Short-term incentive structure Performance criteria Weighting Corporate financial goals 50% Net sales Operating income, adjusted Free cash flow, adjusted Team Goals 25% Accelerate organic growth / exceed 5-year plan targets Actively enhance growth through acquisitions and integration Deliver efficiency and effectiveness Increase value of QIAGEN as employer of choice Enhance customer experiences Personal goals 25% The weighting of the quantitative criteria and also the emphasis of specific drivers of these criteria, may change with the strategic priorities in any given year. For the Chief Executive Officer the target annual short-term variable cash bonus is set at 56.3% of the annual base salary and the maximum is equivalent to 85.8% of the annual base salary. The Chief Financial Officer has a target annual shortterm variable cash bonus set at 44.3% with the maximum being equivalent to 67.6% of the annual fixed salary. The weighted performance spread for the corporate financial goals is 100% at budget and capped at 200%. Team Goals are capped at 110% and individual goals at 100%. In the event that financial goals are not achieved, the members of the Managing Board are not eligible for a short-term variable cash bonus pay out. The principles of the short-term variable cash bonus, with different weights for performance measures and different levels of target bonuses, are applicable to all employees worldwide. Remuneration Report 5

Long-Term Incentives On June 25, 2014, the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders approved significant changes to the Remuneration Policy in view of equity-based compensation. Long-term equity-based compensation (also referred to as Long Term Incentives or LTIs ) granted to members of the Managing Board under the 2014 Stock Plan, which was also approved by shareholders in June 2014, shall primarily consist of an award of performance stock units ( PSUs ), i.e. long-term incentive awards that are subject to performance criteria. Stock Options and restricted stock units ( RSUs ), i.e. longterm incentive awards that are subject to time vesting, shall be reserved for use as special incentive rewards in certain situations only. The number of PSUs to be granted as annual equity-based remuneration to the members of the Managing Board will be determined on an individual basis by the Supervisory Board, taking into account a variety of factors that include the Managing Director s performance and experience, external benchmarks, as well as the complexity of the position and the scope and areas of his or her responsibility, consistent with the framework for remuneration of other senior managers of the Company and in alignment with the intended long-term retention of our top management. In any event, the value of the regular annual long-term incentive awards (depreciated due to factors such as risk of forfeiture, the Company s failure to achieve its long-term initiatives, and the length of the vesting terms) shall not be greater than 300% of the value of the annual fixed salary for each Managing Board member. The number of PSUs to be earned pursuant to the grants to the members of the Managing Board will be subject to the achievement of challenging performance goals: 90% of each award shall be based on absolute financial performance measures and 10% of each award shall be based on relative performance targets. An overachievement of a performance goal will result in an increase in the number of PSUs earned on a scale that is capped at 120% of the total award. Conversely, an underachievement will result in a decrease in the number of PSUs earned. No PSUs will be earned in the event that the Company s adjusted EBIT is negative for the year of the grant. Absolute performance measures shall consist of the following key financial indicators: Performance Measure/ Key Financial Indicator Contribution to the annual PSU award Net Sales 40% Operating Income* 40% Free Cash Flow* 10% *Adjusted, as publicly disclosed in the Company s earnings releases The absolute figures of these key financial indicators will each be derived from the Company s annual budget and aligned with the annual bonus plan. The Supervisory Board shall be authorized to set other comparable key financial indicators with a different weight to reflect changes from the current strategy and goals of the Company. In the event that less than 100% of one of the above stated key financial indicators is achieved, the corresponding number of PSUs will be reduced accordingly, e.g. a 90% achievement of the stated Net Sales figure will lead to a 10% reduction of the number of PSUs earned based on the achievement of such figure. The relative performance target shall be the share price performance of the Company, measured at the end of each calendar year against the share price performance of an index developed from a selected peer group representing a balanced mix of U.S. and European companies in the industries in which we operate. Remuneration Report 6

QIAGEN s practice has been increasingly focused on granting a major part of variable remuneration in equity-based compensation instruments. This ensures that Managing Board members have interests strongly aligned with long-term shareholders. Pay Ratio Under the new 2017 Dutch Corporate Governance Code we are required to report the ratio between the remuneration of the members of the Managing Board and that of a representative reference group within the company and its affiliated enterprise. QIAGEN s internal pay ratio is determined as the ratio between the average pay of the Managing Board as disclosed in the Corporate Governance Report in our 2017 Annual Report and the average pay of total global employees based on the disclosure in footnote 13 of our Annual Report. The combined pay ratio for the Managing Board is 105:1 (2016: 83:1). The Corporate Governance Code does not provide precise guidance and therefore the comparability across companies may not be given. The pay ratio may also be incomparable year over year since the Managing Board has a higher variable remuneration component than the other employees and accordingly together with the variable compensation the pay ratio will vary. QIAGEN is a globally operating company with sites in 30+ countries with different pay structures. QIAGEN s broad footprint in countries all over the world, particularly for the purpose of distribution of its products where other companies typically sell through third parties, distorts the comparability of the pay ratio. In addition, QIAGEN has moved a significant number of employees (e.g. through the creation of shared service centers) into countries which have not only different pay structures but also different pay levels compared to the Netherlands. Calculating the pay ratio with a reference group in which the relevant employees in these countries are excluded the pay ratio for the Managing Board would be 85:1 (2016: 68:1). QIAGEN Commitment Program In 2016, the QIAGEN Commitment Program was re-launched for members of the Managing Board and a select group of senior managers with the establishment of goals for the years 2016-2018 that must be achieved in line with QIAGEN s five-year business plan. Equity instruments were granted in 2016 that have specific vesting requirements related to these goals, but the program is in fact a performance-based compensation system for the years 2016-2018. The QIAGEN Commitment Program combines grants of long-term incentives linked to achievement of financial goals as defined in QIAGEN s 5-year business plan with a mandatory minimum share ownership program. Commitment Performance Share Units The program s PSU instruments ( Commitment PSUs ) are directly linked to the achievement of financial milestones as defined in QIAGEN s 5-year business plan. The performance triggers for Commitment PSUs are defined by financial milestones as outlined in QIAGEN s 5-year business plan and based on the plan s targets after the second full calendar year. The respective hurdles for vesting have been approved by the Supervisory Board and include Net Sales, EBIT and QIAGEN Value Added targets. QIAGEN Value Added is QIAGEN s profit measurement defined as net operating income profit after tax less a capital charge. Commitment PSUs vest over three (40%), five (50%) and ten years (10%). Remuneration Report 7

Mandatory Share Holding Included in QIAGEN s Commitment Program, and as a condition of eligibility for the Commitment PSU awards, is a mandatory minimum shareholding requirement. Failure to maintain mandatory holding of QIAGEN shares will result in immediate cancelation of the Commitment PSUs and may result in reduction of other long-term incentive awards. As of January 31, 2018, the Chief Executive Officer beneficially owned 2.68 million (1.18%) shares and the Chief Financial Officer beneficially owned 40,000 shares. Pensions Members of the Managing Board participate in a defined contribution benefit plan. The target retirement age under the plan is age 65. The participant and employer both contribute to the plan. The participant is entitled to a one-time pension payment upon retirement. In the event that the Managing Director s service should be terminated prior to age 65, the employee-financed portion of the pension expectancy will fall to the employee while the employer-financed portion will be due to the employee only if the termination occurs after the fifth anniversary of participation in the plan. Loans Members of the Managing Board have not been provided with any loans. Other Benefits In addition to the remuneration described above, other benefits may be provided to members of the Management Board. These include customary benefits such as insurance coverage, company vehicles, and legal and tax assistance. Employment Contracts The employment contracts of the members of the Managing Board are determined by the Supervisory Board and are built to comply with the framework of the Remuneration Policy. The employment contracts are set in accordance with Dutch law. Due to the holding company nature of the legal entity QIAGEN N.V., the members of the Managing Board are in addition employed by foreign QIAGEN affiliates. The employment agreements with the Managing Directors and the Company s German affiliate include a new clause, whereby the affiliate will compensate the Managing Directors for potential deductions under Dutch law which, since 2014, has introduced a duty to deduct from a Managing Director s remuneration any increase in the value of shares or options that were part of his pay to the extent that such increase is based on a public offer, merger or other identity-changing transaction. The Dutch employment agreements are the basis for the comply or explain comparisons to the provisions of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (hereinafter the Code ), which includes a number of non-mandatory principles and provisions. To the extent these principles and provisions do not apply, the Company explains and gives reasons for their non-application. QIAGEN is concordant with almost all of the Code principles and provisions and intends to adhere to the highest standards at all times. Remuneration Report 8

Term of Employment The employment contracts of existing members of the Managing Board have been entered into for an indefinite period of time. No arrangements for early retirement of the Managing Board members are offered. Members of the Managing Board are appointed annually by the General Meeting of Shareholders. Notice Period and Severance The employment contracts of Managing Board members end by notice of either party. The notice period by a Managing Board member is subject to a term of three months. The notice period by the Company is subject to a six-month term. The members of the Managing Board have additional employment agreements with other QIAGEN affiliates in jurisdictions outside the Netherlands that have notice periods deviating from terms in the employment agreements with QIAGEN N.V. In case of termination of an agreement without serious cause as defined by the applicable law, the respective affiliate would remain obliged to compensate the Managing Board member for the remaining term of the employment agreement, whereas the Code recommends as severance, in the case of dismissal, a maximum sum equivalent to one year of salary. QIAGEN believes that its current contractual arrangements are well justified due to the long tenures of the Managing Board members. The Supervisory Board will provide best efforts to ensure that failure and poor performance is not rewarded in the event of a termination. Change in Control In the event of the sale or the transfer of all or substantially all of the Company s assets or business to an acquirer in one or several transactions, including a merger, consolidation or a transfer of shares to a third party (a Transaction ), the members of the Managing Board are entitled to a change of control payment commensurate to a multiple (for Peer M. Schatz 5, for Roland Sackers 3) of annual salary (fixed payment plus annual bonus, includes salaries and bonuses set forth in employment agreements with other QIAGEN affiliates). Further, stock options, RSUs and PSUs that are granted to the members of the Managing Board, would be subject to an accelerated vesting in case of a Transaction. Clawback Provisions The Supervisory Board has the right to recover variable remuneration from members of the Managing Board on the basis of its statutory powers. New Hires The terms and conditions of employment for new members of the Managing Board will adhere to their full extent, where sensible, with the Code and to the Bill on Management and Supervision that was enacted on January 1, 2013. Remuneration Report 9

2017 Managing Board Remuneration The remuneration of the members of the Managing Board for 2017 was determined in accordance with the Remuneration Policy as approved by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders in June 2014. Base Salary The following table sets forth 2017 base salary levels for the Managing Board members (1). 2017 Peer M. Schatz $ 1,192,000 Roland Sackers $ 535,000 (1) All salary figures at YTD average rate EUR/USD 1.1292 Short-Term Incentives The assessment of the performance of the Managing Board resulted in the payout of an annual variable cash award as presented in the table below. Annual cash bonus Peer M. Schatz $ 671,000 Roland Sackers $ 237,000 Long-Term Incentives Based on the performance of the individual member of the Managing Board and taking into account total compensation levels relative to markets, the members of the Managing Board have been granted long-term incentive awards for the financial year 2017 which consisted of PSUs Size and value of the awards granted to members of the Managing Board are in line with industry practice and comparable awards granted by our peers to their senior executives. The following table sets forth the PSUs granted to our Managing Board as of January 31, 2018: PSUs granted Peer M. Schatz 445,000 Roland Sackers 186,075 Remuneration Report 10

The following table sets forth the PSUs of our Managing Board as of January 31, 2018: Peer M. Schatz in 2017 Performance Stock Units Year of grant 31, 2016 Granted Performance adjustment Released 31, 2017 Share price on grant date Share price on release date 2017 445,000 (110,350) 334,650 $ 29.26 2016 (1) 460,220 460,220 $ 24.38 2016 24,910 (12,454) 12,456 $ 21.58 $ 30.22 2016 273,574 273,574 $ 21.11 2015 321,988 321,988 $ 25.26 2013 92,043 (36,817) 55,226 $ 23.16 $ 29.34 2012 18,387 (18,387) $ 15.57 1,191,122 445,000 (110,350) (67,658) 1,458,114 Commitment Performance Stock Units can be achieved at minimum performance of 25% up to 200% based on the achievement of targets. If targets do not achieve the 25% minimum performance, then grant is forfeit. Roland Sackers in 2017 Performance Stock Units Year of grant 31, 2016 Granted Performance adjustment Released 31, 2017 Share price on grant date Share price on release date 2017 186,075 (102,584) 83,491 $ 30.38 2016 (1) 144,809 144,809 $ 24.38 2016 21,076 21,076 $ 27.71 $ 30.22 2016 47,043 47,043 $ 21.11 2016 7,994 (3,997) 3,997 $ 21.58 2015 89,804 89,804 $ 25.26 2013 28,960 (11,584) 17,376 $ 23.16 $ 28.97 339,686 186,075 (102,584) (15,581) 407,596 Commitment Performance Stock Units can be achieved at minimum performance of 25% up to 200% based on the achievement of targets. If targets do not achieve the 25% minimum performance, then grant is forfeit. Remuneration Report 11

The following table sets forth the RSUs of our Managing Board as of January 31, 2018: Peer M. Schatz in 2017 Restricted Stock Units Year of grant 31, 2016 Granted Released 31, 2017 Share price on grant date Share price on release date 2016 21,081 (10,540) 10,541 $ 21.11 $ 28.97 2014 383,469 (153,387) 230,082 $ 22.25 $ 28.46 2013 419,717 (167,886) 251,831 $ 21.44 $ 28.83 2012 465,181 (418,662) 46,519 $ 15.28 $ 28.78 2011 233,057 (194,214) 38,843 $ 20.63 $ 28.83 2010 203,682 (169,735) 33,947 $ 21.81 $ 28.83 2009 39,385 39,385 $ 16.02 2008 25,868 25,868 $ 21.99 2007 31,817 (31,817) $ 16.39 $ 28.46 1,823,257 (1,146,241) 677,016 Roland Sackers in 2017 Restricted Stock Units Year of grant 31, 2016 Granted Released 31, 2017 Share price on grant date Share price on release date 2016 7,153 (3,576) 3,577 $ 21.11 $ 28.97 2014 116,344 (46,537) 69,807 $ 22.25 $ 28.46 2013 79,239 79,239 $ 21.44 2012 93,541 (77,950) 15,591 $ 15.28 $ 28.74 2011 13,039 13,039 $ 20.63 2010 10,617 10,617 $ 21.81 2009 25,789 25,789 $ 16.02 2008 8,439 8,439 $ 21.99 354,161 (128,063) 226,098 The following table sets forth the options of Mr. Schatz and Mr. Sackers as of January 31, 2018: Name Total Vested Options Expiration Dates Exercise Prices Peer M. Schatz 628,045 2/27/2019 to 22/28/2023 $15.59 to $22.25 Roland Sackers 162,483 2/27/2019 to 22/28/2023 $15.59 to $22.25 Remuneration Report 12

Pensions During 2017, approximately $150,000 was accrued by QIAGEN to provide pension benefits to the members of the Managing Board. Other benefits The members of the Managing Board received other emoluments equivalent to a total sum of $43,000 in addition to the compensation and pension benefit. These may include costs related to insurance, company vehicles, tax assistance, travel and relocation costs. 2017 Compensation Overview The table below states the amounts earned on an accrual basis by our Managing Board members in 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2017 (in US$ thousands, except for number of award grants) Peer M. Schatz Roland Sackers Fixed Salary $ 1,192 $ 535 Other (1) 5 38 Total fixed income 2017 $ 1,197 $ 573 Short-term variable cash bonus 671 237 Total short-term income 2017 $ 1,868 $ 810 Defined contribution on benefit plan $ 74 $ 76 Number of performance stock units granted 2017 (2) 445,000 186,075 Related recognized compensation expense 1,764 439 (1) Amounts include, among others, car lease and reimbursed personal expenses such as tax consulting. We also occasionally reimburse our Managing Directors' personal expenses related to attending out-of-town meetings but not directly related to their attendance. Amounts do not include the reimbursement of certain expenses relating to travel incurred at the request of QIAGEN, other reimbursements or payments that in total did not exceed $10,000 or tax amounts paid by the Company to tax authorities in order to avoid double-taxation under multi-tax jurisdiction employment agreements. (2) The Performance Stock Units Granted amount includes a special incentive grant of 100,000 PSUs which was not achieved. Future development of the Remuneration Policy The Supervisory Board annually reviews the Company s remuneration practices to ensure they remain aligned with business demands, shareholder interests and developments among peer companies. The Remuneration Policy will be updated with further adjustments to further maximize the commitment and the vested interest in QIAGEN of its senior executives. It aims to further simplify QIAGEN s long-term incentive practice, foster remuneration for long-term sustainable economic and shareholder value creation, align the interests of the senior executives with those of shareholders, and ensure retention. Remuneration Report 13