Washington Association of School Administrators HB 2242 Summary Updated August 17, 2017

Similar documents
Operating Budget Education Funding Plan: EHB Next Steps Resources

Updated: April 15, 2018

Why did my property taxes go up in 2018, did the school district receive all of the money?

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Collective Bargaining Impacts of the McCleary Fix Bill

2018 Post session FAQs

CERTIFICATION OF ENROLLMENT ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL Chapter 13, Laws of (partial veto) 65th Legislature rd Special Session

Tukwila School District. Tukwila School District Budget Advisory Committee. February 20, 2019

Budget Update Prototypical School Model

Budget study session. April 26,2018

Budget Work Session. September 27, Budget Work Session 9/27/2017 Presented by JoLynn Berge

Issaquah School District (HB 2242 & Local Levy Discussion)

BUDGET ADOPTION. PRESENTATION: AUGUST 15, 2018 Mount Vernon School District No. 320

Tonasket School District

WASHINGTON STATE SCHOOL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION. The Basics of School Finance

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary... i

Budget Work Session. December 13, *Slides Updated as Marked

STRATEGIC PLANNING/ BUDGET PROCESS

Photos by Susie Fitzhugh. Board Budget Work Session October 28, 2015 (Revised)

MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP) AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE FORMULA IS CALCULATED

Budget Meeting #2 Budget Overview Presentation 2 for School Year

Second Engrossed Substitute House Bill 1087

Superintendent s Report: McCleary Solution/ State Education Funding Plan

School Board Meeting. August 14, 2018

Budget Advisory Committee

Community Budget Forum

HISTORICAL COMPARISON OF STATEWIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT PERSONNEL TABLE 1: ANNUALIZED AVERAGE SALARIES AND PER CAPITA INCOME

Budget Adoption April 19, 2016 Board of Education Meeting

Levies February 2010 Supporting Seattle s Children. Seattle School Board Work Session September 2, 2009

NORTHSHORE SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET SUMMARY

Budget Status

2018 LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE ISSUE TRAINING. McCleary & SEBB DOUG NELSON, FIELD SERVICES & GOVERNMENT RELATIONS DIRECTOR

UNDERSTANDING SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGETS

If you need further assistance, contact the OPI school budgeting staff: Kara Sperle , Paul Taylor , or Mari Haefka

School Year Budget Planning BUDGET FORUM #2

NORTH KITSAP SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET SUMMARY FY A Great Place to Live & Learn

School Year Budget

WHY WE DO WHAT WE DO FOR CAPITAL FUNDING Capital funding drivers and issues for BAR

Budget Planning April 13, 2015 Board of Education Meeting. Instruction, State Aid, Tax Cap, Tax Freeze & Budget Summary

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED DECEMBER 4, 2017

Budget FAQ s. Table of Contents

CEDAR FALLS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. 2017/18 Budget Presentation

PRELIMINARY BUDGET PRESENTATION

Process. Board of County Commissioners. March 27, 2012

2015 Legislative Conference JANUARY 18, 2015

SB1947 Evidence Based Funding for Student Success Act

BUDGET KICKOFF: BUDGET 101 AIKEN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT JANUARY 15, 2019

Anacortes School District Budget. Budget Hearing August 15, 2013

Introduction to Public Education Finance

Ferndale School District #502 Business and Support Services Budget Summary Citizens' Budget General Fund

[First Reprint] SENATE, No. 29 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 214th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JUNE 21, 2010

Financial Readiness for Board Members

Adoption July 23rd, 2014 SOUTH WHIDBEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 206 BUDGET [F-195] Sept. 1, 2014 Aug. 31, 2015

CHAPTER 2 Budgeting. Accounting Manual for Public School Districts. Chapter 2 Budgeting 2-i Effective Date:

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

Washington State School Finance: A Primer. South Kitsap School District Community Forum March 28, 2018

Adoption July 23rd, 2014 SOUTH WHIDBEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 206 BUDGET [F-195] Sept. 1, 2014 Aug. 31, 2015

Summary of Proposed Budget for FY June 11, 2013

SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING UPDATE Senate Committee on E-12 Policy

CHAPTER I: BUDGET DOCUMENT CONTENTS

Senate Bill 175. Denise Ulberg, Executive Director MASBO 2013 MCEL Conference Billings Hotel October 17, 2013

Appendix E Glossary of Common School Finance Terms

EASTWOOD LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Levies. School Board Work Session May 3, 2018

FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST NOTES AND ASSUMPTIONS. For the Fiscal Years Ending June 30, 2014 through 2018

Governor Snyder s FY2015 Budget Proposal

SUMNER SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET

Agenda. Work Session: Budget. Work Session: Community Workforce Agreements

St. Francis Area Schools

Compensation FAQ Special Annual Leave Bonus FAQs Bus Driver Pay Increase FAQs... 4

Budget Workshop Fiscal Year June 13, 2017

Budget Overview. Board of Education Meeting December 11, 2012

Superintendent s Preliminary Budget

Seattle Public Schools Our Budget and McCleary. JSCEE October 17, 2018

LANE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 4J (EUGENE PUBLIC SCHOOLS) LONG-TERM FINANCIAL FORECAST. January 2015

State Budget Message

Proposed Budget. Presented: March 18, 2013

Millbrae Elementary School District First Interim for Fiscal Year Board of Trustees

Piscataway Board of Education

Understanding the K-12 General Education Funding Program

Illinois Fiscal System And Education Funding

The District s mission statement, which reflects the highest aspirations of the St. Cloud Area School District, states:

CAMAS SCHOOL DISTRICT

Budget Summary August 22, 2013

PORT OF SEATTLE 2017 STATUTORY BUDGET

An Overview of the Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) Formula Louisiana Believes

Arizona School Finance The Cliff s Notes Version. Ricky Hernández Deputy County School Superintendent & CFO

GLOSSARY OF COMMON SCHOOL FINANCE TERMS.

FY15 Wellesley Public School Budget

Recommendations from the QEC Preliminary Draft Document

Telling Our Story. Celebrations, Challenges, and Choices

Budget Contents BUDGET CONTENTS - FUNDS

REPORT 1191F STATE OF WASHINGTON RUN JAN 24, 11:43 PROSSER SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

Survey of Cupertino Union School District Likely Special Election Voters

FY 16 Transportation Funding

Budget Update Jaime Alicea Superintendent of Schools April 11, 2018

Overview of the Title VI-B LEA Authenticated Application: Maintenance of Effort & Excess Cost. Revised 2/28/2013

Bloomfield Hills Schools FY2014/15 Midyear Budget and Forecast Preview

CHAPTER 2 Budgeting. Table of Contents

Financial Plan

South Orange-Maplewood School District. February 27, 2017

Transcription:

Washington Association of School Administrators HB 2242 Summary Updated August 17, 2017 Educator Salaries Section 101 The current Salary Allocation Model (SAM) and Staff Mix Formula are discontinued after 2017-18 school year. Beginning in 2018-19 school districts will receive the statewide average allocation for CIS, CLS, and CAS staff. School districts whose teachers have higher than average experience and/or training will not have those additional costs covered by the state allocation. The average allocation in 2019-20 is as follows but adjusted for IPD inflation from 2017-18: CIS $64,000 CAS $95,000 CLS $45,912 For 2018-19 the Salary allocations will be midway between each district s 2017-18 and 2019-20 average allocations. During that year a district s allocation is the greater of what they received in 2017-18 or the new 2018-19 amount. Beginning in 2018-19 the CIS, CAS, and CLS salary allocation will be adjusted by the regionalization factors found in LEAP Document 3. This factor provides an additional allocation based on the median single family home value for the district and all districts within 15 miles. (WASA has the list of neighboring districts used in this calculation if you re interested). Most of the values in LEAP Document 3 remain the same through 2022-23, after which when the factors will be recalculated. The factor for 27 districts was increased above the calculated value and the factor for those districts will decline beginning in 2020-21. It is important to be aware of that change in bargaining and when completing the required four-year budget. The regionalization factor will be recalculated in 2023-24 and every six years thereafter. Regionalization Examples: School District 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Shoreline 1.24 1.24 1.22 1.20 1.18 Lake Washington North Thurston 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.06 1.06 1.05 1.04 1.03 Yelm 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Section 103 Even without the SAM there are some required salary amounts. The minimum CIS salary in 2019-20 is $40,000 multiplied times the districts regionalization factor plus inflation based on the Implicit Price Deflator (IPD). CIS with five years of experience must earn at least $44,000 plus regionalization factor. The maximum CIS salary is $90,000 plus regionalization. 1

Districts may elect to pay a 10% bonus for ESA s, or teachers of science, technology, engineering, math, transitional bilingual, or special education. It is unclear if this must be done from within the state CIS salary allocation, or if it is a permitted use of local enrichment levy funds. Beginning Sept. 1 2019 CIS supplemental contracts that provide enrichment beyond basic education must comply with the restrictions found in Section 501. Section 104 Beginning with the 2023 Leg. Session, and every six years thereafter, the state will review and rebase basic education compensation allocations. By Nov. 1, 2022, and every six years thereafter, the Dept. of Revenue will recalculate the median value of single family homes for each district as well as the values for districts within 15 miles. This will be the basis of recalculating the regionalization factor in 2023-24 school year. No district will receive less funding due to the change in its recalculated regionalization factor. Section 105 Beginning in the 2018-19 school year Professional Learning Days will be added for CIS staff as follows: 2018-19 1 day 2019-20 2 days 2020-21 3 days While not clearly stated in this section, the salary for these days is said to be on top of the allocation amounts specified in Section 101. Section 107 OSPI must convene and facilitate a technical working group to develop a model salary grid that is intended to provide guidance to districts but which is not required. The initial grid must be completed by Dec. 1, 2017. Section 501 Enrichment and TRI Pay Limitations Local revenues can be used for salaries only for the documented and demonstrated enrichment of basic education. We assume that deemed done or a percent added to salaries won t be allowed after Sept. 1, 2019. Local salary costs for the administration of enrichment programs cannot exceed the proportion of salary that local revenue represents as a percent of other revenues. OSPI will adopt rules related to section 501. Section 502 OSPI may submit to the Legislature a list of proposed permitted enrichment activities beyond those identified in Section 501. The Legislature will act on any recommendation during the 2018 Session. Sections 701-706 Salary increases in 2018-19 for CIS, CAS, and CLS, including supplemental contracts, cannot exceed the CPI increase as compared with 2017-18. These restrictions only apply to collective bargaining agreements entered into after July 6, 2017. Local Levies Section 201 M&O Levies are renamed enrichment levies. Beginning Sept. 1, 2019, enrichment levies may only be used to enrich the state s statutory program of basic education as authorized under section 501. Beginning with Enrichment Levy collections in 2020, districts must receive OSPI approval for their enrichment levy expenditure plan prior to submitting the measure to the voters. 2

Section 203 Levy capacity will be capped at $1.50 per $1000 of assessed property value starting in 2019. District s may collect an enrichment levy amount that does not exceed the lesser amount generated by a $1.50 tax rate or $2500 per pupil. This replaces the 28% max levy lid. Beginning with taxes levied in 2020, the funds must be deposited in a separate subfund of the school district s general fund. Transportation vehicle fund levies are exempted from the limitations of Section 203. Since there is not mention of capital levies in the bill we assume there is no change in those tax measures. Section 204 Regarding levies submitted to voters in 2020 and after, OSPI is required to respond within 30 days after a school district submits the required enhancement levy expenditure plan. If OSPI rejects the plan the district can resubmit a revised spending plan and OSPI has 30 days to respond. After receiving voter approval for an enrichment levy, a school district may change their spending plan by submitting a revised plan for OSPI approval. In such case the district must provide notice and an opportunity for review and comment at an open meeting of the school board and the board must adopt the revised plan by resolution. After receiving approval of an expenditure plan from OSPI, the districts may change the relative amounts to be spent for those respective purposes for the same levy in subsequent years without receiving approval if the district includes those changes in its annual budget proposal. Section 206 The Local Effort Assistance (LEA) formula is changed beginning in the 2019 calendar year. This will impact the second half the 2018-19 school year and each full year after that. Districts qualify for LEA if their $1.50/$1,000 levy collects less than $1,500 per student based on the prior year s enrollment. LEA is intended to close that gap. A district s maximum LEA funding will be prorated if their voters approve a levy of less than $1.50/$1,000. Section 601 Beginning in the 2019-20 school year, school districts must use a local revenue subfund to account for how local funds are used. Local funds are defined as including, but not limited to enrichment levies, transportation vehicle enrichment levies, LEA, grants, donations, and payments in lieu of taxes. Note: Since school budget years are different than tax collection years, there may be some confusion regarding reporting compliance. For example, districts are required to begin reporting levy expenditures in the 2019-20 school year using a new subfund account. Only the 2020 portion that report will be made up of the enrichment levy that requires OSPI approval and reporting of actual expenditures by the district. We anticipate that OSPI will provide guidance about such issues prior to the implementation of these changes. School District Budgets and Accounting Section 103 Supplemental contracts must be accounted for in the district budgets. Section 503 Beginning with the 2019-20 school year, the State Auditor must review school district expenditure to ensure that local revenues are solely used for enriching basic education. 3

Section 602 By the 2019-20 school year school districts must provide separate accounting for state and local revenues to expenditures. Section 603 Beginning in 2018-19 School district budgets must include both state and locally-funded salary amounts for CIS, CAS, and CLS staff. Section 604 Beginning in 2018-19, school districts must produce a four-year budget plan which includes a four-year enrollment projection and estimates of funding necessary to maintain current program levels and supplemental contract obligations. Completed districts budgets must include a summary of the four-year budget plan. The budget must be submitted to the district s ESD and OSPI by July 10 th. OSPI must use this four-year budget information when ranking the financial health of districts. Section 605-606 Proposed changes to the uses of district enrichment funding presented for the preballot approval for enrichment levies must be included in the budget public hearings required RCW 28A.505.060. Collective Bargaining Restrictions During Transition Sections 701-703 For collective bargaining agreements executed after July 6, 2017, districts may not provide salary increases including supplemental contracts in the 2018-19 school year that exceed the previous year contract by more than the increase in the Seattle CPI. If a district s average CIS, CLS, or CAS salary is less than the district s state allocation for 2018-19, the district may increase those salaries up to amount allocated by the state. Section 706 School districts are authorized to reach agreement on compensation for enrichment activities authorized in Section 501 of this act. Health Benefits Section 801 School Employees Benefit Board (SEBB) is created to design insurance benefit plans for school employees. By Sept. 30, 2017 the governor will appoint SEBB board members from within specified categories. The SEBB Board will develop educational employee benefit plans. The employee costs for full family coverage under SEBB authorized plans cannot exceed the cost for employeeonly coverage. Employees must work 630 hours per year to qualify for coverage. The SEBB Board will participate in the selection of carriers contracted to provide educational employee plans. Section 802 Existing health care plan provisions will remain in effect through Dec. 31, 2019. Section 806 Beginning on Jan. 1, 2020 health benefits for school district and ESD employees shall merged into the SEBB. Section 815 Beginning Jan. 1, 2020, no basic or optional health benefits may be provided by school districts that are not provided through the SEBB. 4

Section 817 Employee insurance benefit bargaining with the Governor s Office shall begin after July 1, 2018 over the dollar amount provided for health care benefits beginning Jan. 1, 2020. Subsequent bargaining for medical benefit dollar amounts, beginning Jan. 1, 2020 and every even-numbered year thereafter and submitted to the Legislature. Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program (TPEP) Section 902 OSPI must provide an update on TPEP to the education and operating budget committees of the Legislature. The update will include the percentage of teachers and principals in each of the four summative ratings. Added Staffing Section 904 This section provides some specified enrichment to the protoypical model staff allocations. We assume these will become part of the definition of basic education, but since they are called enrichment, that isn t certain. School District Implementation Timeline of Major Elements HB 2242 Element Salaries Paid by Districts 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 No Change, current laws govern salaries including TRI. 101 Total salaries for CIS, CAS, and CLS including TRI can only increase over 17-18 by the % increase in Seattle CPI. 701-703. This restriction only applies to CBA s executed after July 6, 2017. The CIS maximum salary without TRI and 10% bonuses is $90,000 (plus IPD adj.). 103 Beginning CIS must receive at least $40,000 (plus IPD adj.). 101 CIS with 5 yrs. exp. must receive at least $44,000 (plus IPD adj.) 103 Districts may add up to 10% above the maximum salary for those who teach in STEM, Sp.Ed. and Bilingual CIS. 103 Supplemental salaries must comply with restrictions in 501. Same limits as 19-20 with IPD adjustment. 5

HB 2242 Element State Salary Allocation 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Same as 16-17 which uses district staff mix factor plus 2.3% COLA. 101 The SAM and staff mix formula are replaced by a state average salary allocation. 101 The 18-19 allocation for CIS, CAS, and CLS is halfway between district s 17-18 and 19-20 allocations. 101(8) A district s 18-19 salary allocation is the greater of what they received in 17-18 or the new 18-19 amount. 101(8) In addition to base salary, 93 districts have regional salary adjustments of 1.06 to 1.24. 101(9) CIS staff are allocated one Prof Learning Day (PLD) with additional salary. 105 Benefits Same as 16-17. Same as 17-18. Districts may be required to submit data on their employee health insurance plans. 808 Levies Measures submitted to voters must comply with the restrictions for 2019, 2020 and beyond. Maximum levy collection in 2019 and beyond is $2,500 per students or $1.50 per $1,000, whichever is less. 203 For levy collections in 2020 and beyond, districts must receive OSPI pre-approval for their levy expenditure plan prior to submitting measure to voters. 201 District salary allocations will be as follows (plus adj. for IPD from 17-18) for every state funded unit: CIS $64,000 CAS $95,000 CLS $45,912 101(5) CIS staff receive additional pay for 2 PLDs. 105 Beginning Jan. 1, 2020, new SEBB plan is required for all district employees. Non-SEBB options prohibited. 816 Same as 18-19 plus new restrictions on the use of local funds starting with 2020 collections. 201 Limitations on the use of local funds are identified in 501-502. The regionalization factor will begin to reduce for 27 districts. CIS staff receive additional pay for 3 PLDs. 105 Same as 19-20 except new required SEBB coverage will be for entire school year. Same as 19-20. 6

HB 2242 Element Local Effort Assistance (LEA) District Budgets and Accounting 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Same policy as 16-17 but eligibility and funding may change due to relative changes in real estate market. Supplemental contracts must be included in the fouryear budget developed for 2018-19 and beyond. 103(4) New LEA formula implemented beginning Jan. 1, 2019. 206 LEA eligible districts are those for whom $1.50 / $1.000 levy doesn t generate $1,500 per student. A district s maximum LEA is what it takes to reach $1,500 per student with a $1.5 / $1,000 levy. 206 Actual LEA funding is prorated for districts that don t reach $1.50 / $1,000 with their voter approved levy. Districts must use a four-year budget including four-year enrollment projections. 604 Supplemental contracts must be included in four-year budget. 103 District budgets must include state and locally-funded amounts for CIS, CAS, and CLS salaries. 603 School districts must report to OSPI on TRI contracts 502. Public budget adoption meeting must include proposed changes to enrichment funding plan approved by OSPI. 605-606 First full school year budget with new LEA formula. 206 Beginning with 2020 collections, enrichment levies must be deposited in a separate subfund. 203(5) Districts must provide separate accounting of state and local revenues to expenditures. 602 State Auditor must review district expenditures to ensure local funds used for basic ed. enrichment. 503 Same as 19-20 Same as 19-20 7

HB 2242 Element Bargaining Implications 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 For new contracts, there may be interest in bargaining 17-18 salaries as high as possible due to limitations on increases in 2018-19. Without the SAM, each district will need to bargain a new certificated salary schedule to be in place by the start of the 18-19 school year. The following items must be addressed whenever the contract is reopened, but prior to the 19-20 school year. Negotiating salary elements of multi-year contracts will be difficult given uncertainty about how new law will play out. Accurately anticipating future fiscal capacity without one successful attempt at the new enrichment levy and some experience with new budget drivers will be very difficult. Given than uncertainly it s critical that you not over commit prior to gaining that understanding. If your district provides any deemed done salary within the TRI contract, those will need to be rebargained to eliminated to comply with the new law.. Anticipate creative proposals to work around the supplemental salary limitations in the new law. Local unions may seek to be paid for anything outside of teaching a five-hour day. Communication with neighboring districts about the contract requests/demands you receive will be more important than ever. 8