CALCULATING "PAY OR PLAY" PENALTIES

Similar documents
"PAY OR PLAY" TOOLKIT FOR EMPLOYERS

"PAY OR PLAY" TOOLKIT FOR EMPLOYERS

Employee Benefits Series. Health Care Reform "Pay or Play" Toolkit for Employers

HEALTH CARE REFORM WHETHER TO PLAY OR PAY (Executive Summary) Dated: January 11, 2013

Pay or Play Penalty Common Ownership Aggregation Rules

Pay or Play Employer Shared Responsibility Penalties

Pay or Play Employer Shared Responsibility Penalties

The requirement for large employers to offer coverage to its full-time employees (and their dependents) has new effective dates:

Compliance Alert. Frequently Asked Questions about ACA Employer Health Coverage Reporting EPIC Webinar Follow-up

Summary of ACA Employer Responsibility Requirements

Forms 1094 & 1095 Reporting

Health Care Reform. Preparing for the Coming Storm. Health Care Reform Fox Rothschild

Pay or Play Penalty Transition Relief Provisions

Health Care Reform Simplifying Reform - Issue date Feb. 14, 2014

Non-Calendar Year Health Plans Delayed Effective Date Worksheet Lisa Klinger, J.D., & Susan Grassli, J.D.

HEALTH CARE REFORM: EMPLOYER SHARED RESPONSIBILITY RULES

Employer Reporting Guide for Large Employers and 6056 Reporting for Large Employers

Shared Responsibility for Employers Regarding Health Care Coverage

Non-Calendar Year Health Plans Delayed Effective Date Worksheet May 2015

EMPLOYER MANDATE FACT SHEET

The Employer Shared Responsibility Under the Affordable Care Act

Health Care Reform UPDATE. A periodic publication about Health Care Reform December 2015 FEATURE STORY ALSO IN THIS ISSUE DISSECTING THE 1095-C FORMS

IRS Enforcement of Employer Mandate

Received Letter 226J Now What?

REVIEW OF THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS UNDER CODE SECTIONS 6055 AND 6056

5 Steps to Conquer the Affordable Care Act Employer Mandate. Prepared for Annual Government Contracting Seminar

The Affordable Care Act Part II Collection/Record Keeping and Government Filings

Sections 6055 and 6056: MEC and ALE Reporting to the IRS

Determining Large Employer Status for 2015

Affordable Care Act Guidance on Employers Shared Responsibility & Coverage Waiting Period

Shared Responsibility for Employers Regarding Health Coverage The Pay or Play Rules. Mary Powell & Brian Gilmore March 4, 2014

Health Care Reform Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions

Health Care Reform. Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions SAFE HARBOR QUALIFICATION

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ) ABOUT THE ACA:

Affordable Care Act: 2015 Transition Rules

Reform School Consolidated Sales

Pay or Play Penalties Look-back Measurement Method Examples

BENEFITS REQUIREMENTS

The Affordable Care Act s Employer Mandate

Determining Full-Time Employee Status for 2017

AFFORDABLE CARE ACT (ACA) INFORMATION REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE

SHRM Meeting Health Care Reform: Considerations for 2014 / 2015

Glossary of Terminology

Amending ACA Reporting Forms in the Era of Pay or Play Penalties

T R U S T E D A D V I S O R S. Providing Outstanding Client Service Boston /Cambridge/Newport / Providence / Waltham

Be Prepared to Respond to IRS Employer Shared Responsibility Payment Assessments

Mandatory Affordable Care Act January 31, 2017 IRS Code Section 6056 Reporting: Forms 1094-C and 1095-C

Health Care Reform Exchanges, Penalties and Employer Responsibility

Affordable Care Act: Key Issues for Employers in 2014 and Beyond

Employer Mandate Report

Employer Shared Responsibility Glossary of Key Terms

UPDATE ON THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT

Affordable Care Act (ACA) Information Reporting Return Requirements. Presented by Christopher B. Clark, CEBS

Health Care Reform: The Future is Now. Brydon M. DeWitt

Employer Shared Responsibility

The Affordable Care Act s Employer Mandate

2018 Compliance Checklist

Affordable Care Act: what tax directors need to know. 14 May 2013

Health Care Reform Under the ACA Its Effect on Municipalities and Their Employees

2015 Heath Care Reform Compliance Overview

2016 Compliance Checklist

Key Considerations in Avoiding and Calculating Penalties Pursuant to the Employer Shared Responsibility Mandate. Benefits & Human Resources Consulting

What Texas School Officials Should Understand About the Affordable Care Act

IRS Q&A About Employer Information Reporting on Form 1094-C and Form 1095-C

Affordable Care Act Financial Advisory Council November 11,2016

Health Care Reform Review and Best Practices. Fall 2014 User Group Meeting

7/8/2015. HEALTH CARE REFORM AND ITS EFFECTS ON YOUR BUSINESS Presented by Ophelia Y., SPHR, GPHR, MBA AGENDA

Compliance Alert. ACA Mandates Different Measures of Affordability

Stay up-to-date with our compliance news!

New ACA Rules for HRAs, Flex Credits and Opt- Out Payments

Health Care Reform Update

Larry Grudzien Attorney at Law

Navigating the Employer Mandate

HRAs, HSAs, and Health FSAs What s the Difference?

THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT UPDATE

Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions and Information Returns for Tax Year 2015

Affordable Care Act Title 1: Employer Mandate. MAJ Philip Durando CPT Elvis Gonzalez CPT Stephanie Kessinger

Health Care Reform What Are the Changes for Employers. Greenberg Traurig

Health care reform update

Affordable Care Act (ACA) Employer Health Coverage Reporting Requirements. Malcolm C. Slee, Esq. Groom Law Group December 9, 2015

6/23/10 9/23/10 1/1/11 1/1/12 6/28/12 11/6/12 1/1/

6/20/13 Presented By: Mike Marchini, Beckie Lewis, & Liz Logsdon or

ManpowerGroup Health Care Reform Webinar Follow-Up Q&A

(ii) in the event there is a change in benefits, the coverage provides minimum value after the change; and

Mastering Forms 1095-C and 1094-C. Brought to you by Preferred Insurance and The DeChristopher Group May 20, 2015

Health Reform Update: Proposed Regulations on Employer Shared Responsibility

Affordable Care Act 2/7/2015. Employer Notice of State Insurance Exchanges and Premium Tax Credits

University of Wisconsin ACA Procedural Guidance

WSRP, LLC Salt Lake City UT, Lehi UT & Las Vegas NV

IMPORTANT HEALTH REFORM INFORMATION FROM THE NEW YORK STATE TEAMSTERS COUNCIL HEALTH AND HOSPITAL FUND. September 16, 2013

Agenda Item C.1 DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEM Meeting Date: June 17, 2014

New Employer Shared Responsibility Penalty Guidance: Timely Employer Action Needed

Health Care Reform Where Are We Today?

IRS Issues Final Rules on Large Employer Reporting Requirements

Employee Benefits Series. Qualified Small Employer HRA Basics

Utah APA State Conference

HEALTH CARE REFORM: EMPLOYER ACTION OVERVIEW

Health Care Reform s Individual and Employer Mandates

Determining Applicable Large Employer Status & Full-Time Equivalent Employees

Overview of Health Care Reform and its Impact on Agricultural Employers 1 (as of October 2012)

Transcription:

Health Care Reform: What to Expect in 2013 2014 Employee Benefits Series Health Care Reform CALCULATING "PAY OR PLAY" PENALTIES 2013 2014 HR 360, Inc. 1

Calculating "Pay or Play" Penalties Beginning in 2015, certain large employers will be subject to the employer shared responsibility ("pay or play") requirements under Health Care Reform. Employers with 100 or more full-time employees (including full-time equivalents) are subject to the requirements starting in 2015, while those with 50 to 99 full-time employees (including full-time equivalents) do not need to comply until 2016 if they meet certain criteria. This worksheet provides step-by-step guidance on the two methods for calculating "pay or play" penalties, based on whether the employer offers health coverage to certain employees. The information and summaries provided in this worksheet are based on final rules issued by the IRS and are subject to change. General information regarding when a penalty may apply, including available transition relief, can be found beginning on page 4 of this worksheet. Employers are strongly advised to consult with employment law counsel or a professional tax advisor for individualized guidance regarding compliance. Employers Not Offering Coverage The penalty for a large employer that does not offer coverage during the calendar year to at least 95% of its full-time employees (70% for the 2015 plan year) and their dependents (unless transition relief applies), where at least one full-time employee is certified to receive a premium tax credit, is calculated as follows: Number of Full- Time Employees 1 = Minus 30 2 = Multiplied by $2000 3 Penalty = $ 1 Do not count full-time equivalent employees (FTEs) or employees in a limited non-penalty period. 2 For the 2015 plan year, an employer with 100 or more full-time employees (including FTEs) on business days during 2014 may reduce the number of full-time employees by 80 rather than 30. Employers under common ownership or that are otherwise related and combined for determining large employer status are allowed only one reduction of 30 or 80 employees (allocated ratably among the related employers based on the number of full-time employees of each). 3 For an employer offering coverage for some months but not others during the year, the payment is computed separately for each month for which coverage was not offered. The penalty for the month equals the number of full-time employees for the month (minus the allowable reduction) multiplied by 1/12 of $2,000. Example Large Employer employs 100 full-time employees in each calendar month of 2015 and does not provide an employer-sponsored health plan (no limited non-penalty periods apply). At least one of Large Employer's full-time employees is certified to receive a premium tax credit. Large Employer is subject to a penalty equal to 20 x $2,000 (100 full-time employees minus 80, and then multiplied by $2,000) = $40,000 for 2015. Note: For calendar years after 2014, penalty amounts will be adjusted for inflation. 2013 2014 HR 360, Inc. 2

Calculating "Pay or Play" Penalties (cont'd) Employers Offering Coverage That is Not Affordable or Does Not Provide Minimum Value 4 For a large employer that offers coverage to at least 95% of its full-time employees (70% for the 2015 plan year) and their dependents (unless transition relief applies), but has one or more full-time employees who are certified to receive a premium tax credit, the penalty is computed separately for each month as follows: Number of Full-Time Employees Receiving Premium Tax Credit or Cost-Sharing Reduction 5 = Multiplied by 1/12 of $3,000 = $ Penalty = lesser of amount calculated or the amount that would be owed if employer did not offer coverage 4 An employer that offers affordable coverage that provides minimum value to less than 100% of full-time employees may nevertheless owe a penalty if an employee who is not offered coverage receives a premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction. 5 Do not count full-time equivalent employees, employees in a limited non-penalty period, or employees who were offered the opportunity to enroll in coverage under an eligible employer-sponsored plan that satisfied minimum value and met one or more of the affordability safe harbors. Example Large Employer employs 100 full-time employees in each calendar month of 2015 and provides an employer-sponsored health plan to these employees (no limited non-penalty periods apply). Five full-time employees of Large Employer are certified to receive a premium tax credit during each month in 2015 because the coverage offered was unaffordable (the employer did not meet the requirements for any affordability safe harbor). Large Employer is subject to a penalty equal to 5 x 1/12 of $3,000 = ($1,250) x 12 months = $15,000 (the lesser of $15,000 and $40,000) for 2015. Note: For calendar years after 2014, penalty amounts will be adjusted for inflation. 2013 2014 HR 360, Inc. 3

General Rules and Transition Relief An employer that is subject to the "pay or play" requirements may be liable for a penalty if: The employer does not offer health coverage or offers coverage to fewer than 95% of its full-time employees (70% for the 2015 plan year) and their dependents (unless transition relief applies), and at least one full-time employee receives a premium tax credit to purchase coverage on an Exchange (Marketplace) OR The employer offers coverage to at least 95% of its full-time employees (70% for the 2015 plan year) and their dependents (unless transition relief applies), but at least one fulltime employee receives a premium tax credit, because that employee was not offered coverage or because the coverage was unaffordable to the employee or did not provide minimum value The final rules provide transition relief with respect to a number of requirements for 2015, including: Large Employers With Fewer Than 100 Full-Time Employees Employers with 50 to 99 full-time employees (including full-time equivalents) who certify that they meet certain eligibility criteria related to maintenance of workforce, hours of service, and previously offered health coverage will not be subject to a penalty for 2015 (and any months during the 2015 plan year that fall in 2016). Percentage of Employees Offered Coverage For the 2015 plan year, an employer that offers coverage to at least 70% of fulltime employees (and their dependents, unless transition relief applies) may avoid a penalty for failing to offer coverage, rather than 95% which will begin in 2016. (The employer may still owe a penalty if a full-time employee receives a premium tax credit.) Offers of Coverage for January 2015 Only An employee who is offered coverage no later than the first day of the first payroll period that begins in January 2015 will be treated as having been offered coverage for the entire month. (Generally, an employee is treated as not offered coverage during an entire calendar month if he or she is not offered coverage for any day of the month.) Non-Calendar Year Plans Employers with plan years that do not start on January 1 may be able to begin compliance at the start of their plan years in 2015. Three pieces of transition relief are available for employers that maintained non-calendar year plans as of December 27, 2012, if the plan year was not modified thereafter to begin at a later calendar date. Coverage for Dependents An employer that takes steps during the 2014 or 2015 plan year (or both) to extend coverage to dependents who were not offered coverage during the 2013 or 2014 plan year (or both) generally will not be liable for a penalty solely based on the failure to offer coverage to those dependents for such plan year(s). 2013 2014 HR 360, Inc. 4

Limited Non-Penalty Periods for Certain Employees The final rules also provide for limited periods during which an employer generally will not be subject to a penalty: After Beginning Change of Employer's in Employment First Year Status Subject to "Pay or Play" For an employee who was not offered coverage by an employer during the prior calendar year, if the employer offers coverage to the employee on or before April 1 of the first calendar year for which the employer is subject to "pay or play," the employer will not owe a penalty for not offering coverage to the employee for January through March of that year, provided that the coverage offered by April 1 provides minimum value. First and Last Partial Months of Employment An employer is not subject to a penalty with respect to an employee for the calendar month in which his or her start date occurs, if the start date is a date other than the first day of the calendar month. In a calendar month in which employment terminates, if the employee would have been offered coverage if he or she had been employed for the entire month, he or she is treated as having been offered coverage during that month. Initial Three Calendar Months of Employment for New Full-Time Employees Under the "look-back" measurement method, an employer offering coverage providing minimum value to a new employee reasonably expected at his or her start date to be full-time, no later than the first day of the fourth full calendar month of employment, will generally not be subject to a penalty for any calendar month of the three-month period beginning with the first day of the first full calendar month of employment. Initial Measurement Period for New Variable, Seasonal & Part-Time Employees For a new variable hour, seasonal, or part-time employee who has on average at least 30 hours of service per week during the initial measurement period, an employer will not owe a penalty for any calendar month during the initial measurement period (and any associated administrative period) if the employee is offered coverage providing minimum value by the employer no later than the first day of the associated stability period. After Change in Employment Status Under the "look-back" measurement method, an employer will generally not be subject to a penalty with respect to a new variable hour, seasonal, or part-time employee for a period of time after such employee experiences a change to fulltime employee status during the initial measurement period, provided that certain conditions are satisfied. 2013 2014 HR 360, Inc. 5

Calculating "Pay or Play" Penalties Provided by: 427 East Street Road Feasterville, PA 19053 215 (p) edmac@totalbenefits.net Written and created by: HR 360, Inc. Last updated on December 2, 2014 Note: The information and materials herein are provided for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal or other advice or opinions on any specific matters and are not intended to replace the advice of a qualified attorney, plan provider or other professional advisor. This information has been taken from sources believed to be reliable, but there is no guarantee as to its accuracy. In accordance with IRS Circular 230, this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used as or considered a 'covered opinion' or other written tax advice and should not be relied upon for any purpose other than its intended purpose. Notice of Copyright and Restrictions on Use: This document is protected under U.S. copyright laws and may not be copied, altered, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, or transmitted in any way (electronically or otherwise) except as expressly authorized in writing by HR360. The posting of this document on the Internet is strictly prohibited. 2013 2014 HR 360, Inc. 6