Morningstar Sustainability Rating Methodology

Similar documents
Morningstar Sustainability Rating Methodology

Sustainability Matters: Sustainability and Quality Go Hand in Hand U.S. funds with high sustainability ratings tend to have higher-quality holdings.

Morningstar Portfolio Carbon Metrics Morningstar Portfolio Carbon Risk Score TM Morningstar Low Carbon Designation TM Frequently Asked Questions

Disclosure Language. Morningstar Essentials September Contents 1 What guidelines must be followed?

U.S. REIT Credit Rating Methodology

Category Definitions Brazilian Regulated Funds

Category Definitions Brazilian Regulated Funds

Socially Responsible Personal Strategy GO TO TO LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR FREE FINANCIAL TOOLS

CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ESG AND SUSTAINABILITY SCORES

Fund Scorecards FAQ Morningstar's Due Diligence Reports

Examining the Morningstar Quantitative Rating for Funds A new investment research tool.

Morningstar Methodology Enhancements Effective for Periods ending 30 November 2016

January 2017 The materiality of ESG factors for equity investment decisions: academic evidence

MSCI USA ESG SELECT INDEX METHODOLOGY

International Fund Awards Methodology, Italy

Fundamental and Proprietary Data Methodology

International Fund Awards Methodology, South Africa

Atlantic Sunrise Coming On Line U.S. Power and Gas Weekly

Better Outcomes, Less Risk. ESG & Retirement Plans The Case for Greater Compatibility

MSCI Global ESG Indexes Methodology

Methodology for Rating Parents, Subsidiaries, and Issues

An institution focused on innovation

International Fund Awards Methodology, Malaysia

Target Retirement Performance Update

International Fund Awards Methodology, India

SUMMARY PROSPECTUS Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF Ticker: NACP NYSE ARCA July 17, 2018

The Morningstar Sustainable Investing Handbook

Morningstar Investment Management Manager Selection

Fixed Income ESG Survey Results

Future World Fund Q&A

MSCI SRI INDEXES METHODOLOGY

MSCI DIVERSIFIED MULTIPLE-FACTOR INDEXES METHODOLOGY

Target Date Fund Selection: More Than Simply Active vs. Passive

AN ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON ALLOCATIONS TO ALTERNATIVES

A Quantitative Approach to Responsible Investment: Using ESG- Multifactor Models to Improve Equity Portfolios Dr. Andrij Fetsun 1, Dr.

MSCI USA Broad ESG Index

Quantitative Portfolios Beyond Beta. Powered by:

Quantitative Portfolios Beyond Beta. Powered by:

Morningstar Style Box TM Methodology

Fidelity VIP Government Money Market SC Available through Pacific Life's Variable Universal Life Insurance Products

ESG in Equities. Research analysis into the materiality of Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance factors for Equity portfolios

The Morningstar China Active/Passive Barometer November 2018

International Fund Awards Methodology, Norway

ESG Investing: Research & Benchmarks. Thomas Kuh, PhD Executive Director and Global Head of ESG Indexes, MSCI

Construction Rules for the Morningstar US Style Index Family

MSCI DIVERSIFIED MULTIPLE-FACTOR INDEXES METHODOLOGY

MSCI JAPAN EMPOWERING WOMEN (WIN) SELECT INDEX METHODOLOGY

Fund Managers by Gender Through the Performance Lens

Morningstar Rating. A fund can earn one (lowest) to five (highest) stars.

Nationwide Funds. A Nationwide Financial White Paper. Executive summary

Fonds de Compensation FDC SICAV Obligations EUR Actif 3

Franklin U.S. Rising Dividends Fund DIVIDENDS AN INDICATOR OF GROWTH

MSCI ESG FUND METRICS METHODOLOGY

Portfolio Diversification and Performance

MSCI KLD 400 SOCIAL INDEX METHODOLOGY

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL & GOVERNANCE (ESG) INVESTMENT TRENDS

Morningstar Fee Level U.S. Methodology

American Century VP Mid Cap Value II Available through Pacific Life's Variable Universal Life Insurance Products

Calmer Markets Suggest Crude Price Consensus Speculators burned by lower volatility.

A Case For Mid Cap Equities

Morningstar Direct SM Asset Flows Commentary: United States

METHODOLOGY BOOK FOR:

Analysis of fi360 Fiduciary Score : Red is STOP, Green is GO

Stewardship Grade for Fund Firms Methodology

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Women in Leadership. Bond Framework

MSCI Global Socially Responsible Indexes

How Long Can a Good Fund Underperform Its Benchmark?

MSCI DIVERSIFIED MULTI-FACTOR INDEXES METHODOLOGY

CONTENTS. 1 Introduction Constructing the MSCI ESG Leaders Low Carbon ex Tobacco Involvement 5% Indexes... 4

Davenport Small Cap Focus Fund Earns 4 Star Rating from Morningstar

Lazard Insights. Growth: An Underappreciated Factor. What Is an Investment Factor? Summary. Does the Growth Factor Matter?

Guide to Responsible Investing Strategies

KBC. Scope and Objectives

CAN ESG ADD ALPHA? CAN ESG ADD ALPHA? An Analysis of ESG Tilt and Momentum Strategies. Zoltán Nagy, Altaf Kassam, Linda-Eling Lee.

Summer ERCOT U.S. power and gas weekly.

MSCI Prime Value Indexes Methodology

BEST IN CLASS ESG IN PRACTICE September Louise Dudley, Portfolio Manager, Hermes Global Equities

Jupiter approach document SUSTAINABILITY. Sustainability Investment Policy - September On the planet to perform

Morningstar Fiduciary Services FAQs

North Carolina Supplemental Retirement Plans. Performance Review First Quarter 2017

Differences between ESG scores among data vendors

Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX)

MSCI USA CATHOLIC VALUES INDEX METHODOLOGY

Xtrackers MSCI ESG Leaders Equity ETFs

MSCI GLOBAL LOW CARBON LEADERS INDEXES METHODOLOGY

RISK MANAGEMENT. Co-X/QHS/SOP03

RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT POLICY. Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC

MSCI ESG LEADERS INDEXES METHODOLOGY

Category Definitions India

FIDELITY NORTHSTAR FUND

DJSI Diversified Family

MSCI ACWI SELECT GLOBAL NORMS AND CRITERIA INDEX METHODOLOGY

BEST PRACTICES FOR RESPONSIBLE INVESTING

A Case for Natural Resources Investing

Cincinnati Financial Corp.

Trailing PE -- Forward PE -- NA 0 Analysts. 1-Year Return: 424.7% 5-Year Return: 415.2%

Presentation to August 14,

Socially Responsible Investment Guidelines. Carmignac Emergents

MSCI JAPAN EMPOWERING WOMEN INDEX (WIN) METHODOLOGY

PSF Technology Portfolio Available through Pacific Life's Variable Universal Life Insurance Products

Transcription:

? Morningstar Sustainability Rating Methodology Morningstar Research 31 October 2018 Version 1.1 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Portfolio Sustainability Score 5 Historical Sustainability Score 5 Sustainability Rating 6 References Appendix 7 A: Pillar Scores Executive Summary In 2016, Morningstar released the Morningstar Sustainability Rating to help investors use environmental, social, and governance, or ESG, information to evaluate portfolios. The rating provides a reliable, objective way to evaluate how their portfolios are meeting ESG challenges. In 2018, we will enhance the current methodology by making the following changes: Incorporate historical Sustainability Scores Increase rating threshold to 67% of portfolio covered Expand peer groups to using the Morningstar Global Category Increase peer group size threshold to 30 scored portfolios to receive Sustainability Ratings The changes to the methodology will be effective October 2018. Introduction The Morningstar Sustainability Rating is a measure of how well the holdings in a portfolio are performing on environmental, social and governance, or ESG, issues relative to a portfolio s peer group. The rating is an historical holdings-based calculation using company-level ESG analytics from Sustainalytics, a leading provider of ESG research. It is calculated for managed products and indexes globally using Morningstar s portfolio holdings database. The Morningstar Sustainability Rating is the result of a three-step process. First, we calculate the Morningstar Portfolio Sustainability Score for every portfolio reported within the trailing 12 months. Second, we use these scores to calculate a portfolio's Morningstar Historical Portfolio Sustainability Score. Third, we assign a Morningstar Sustainability Rating for a portfolio based on its Morningstar Historical Portfolio Sustainability Score relative to its Morningstar Global Category. The calculations for each step are detailed below.

Page 2 of 8 Morningstar Portfolio Sustainability Score The Morningstar Portfolio Sustainability Score is an asset-weighted average of normalized companylevel ESG scores with deductions made for controversial incidents by the issuing companies, such as environmental accidents, fraud, or discriminatory behavior. The Portfolio Sustainability Score is calculated as follows: Portfolio Sustainability Score = Portfolio ESG Score Portfolio Controversy Deduction Portfolio ESG Score The Portfolio ESG Score is an asset-weighted average of normalized company-level ESG scores. Sustainalytics company-level ESG scores reflect how well a firm is addressing ESG issues based on a series of indicators measuring preparedness, disclosure, and performance. n PortfolioESG = ESGNormalized Weightsadj x=1 Sustainalytics assesses a company s performance on ESG issues relative to other firms in the same global industry peer group, using a 0-100 scale. Because the relevance of particular ESG issues varies across the peer groups, a unique combination of indicators is used within each peer group to determine the company-level ESG score. The use of a unique combination of indicators for each peer group means the same score shared by two companies in different peer groups may not be equivalent--one company s score may signal that it is an outperformer in its peer group while the other company s identical score may indicate that it is an underperformer in its peer group. The peer groups also have varying ESG score ranges and means. To make the ESG scores comparable across peer groups, which is necessary for evaluation of diversified portfolios, Morningstar normalizes the scores of each peer group using a z-score transformation, as follows: Z peer = ESG x μ peer σ peer Where: ESG x = Sustainalytics Company ESG score μ peer = Peer Group Mean ESG score σ peer = Peer Group Standard deviation of ESG scores The z-scores are used to create the normalized ESG scores on a 0-100 scale, with a mean of 50, as follows: ESGNormalized = 50 + (Z peer x 10)

Page 3 of 8 Normalized company ESG scores can be interpreted as follows: 70+ = Company scores at least two standard deviations above average in its peer group 60 = Company scores one standard deviation above average in its peer group 50 = Company scores at peer group average 40 = Company scores one standard deviation below average in its peer group 30 = Company scores at least two standard deviations below average in its peer group Once the company ESG scores are normalized, they are aggregated to a Portfolio ESG Score using an asset-weighted average of all covered securities. Covered securities include equity and fixed-income securities issued by companies that have ESG scores. Securities issued by companies that do not have ESG scores, as well as short positions, options, and derivatives typically issued by third-party financial firms, are not covered. To receive a Portfolio ESG Score, at least 67% of a portfolio s assets under management must have a company ESG score. The percentage of the assets under management of the covered securities is rescaled to 100% before calculating the Portfolio ESG Score. Portfolio Controversy Score Sustainalytics tracks and categorizes ESG-related incidents, referred to as controversies, on more than 10,000 companies globally. Each incident is assessed in terms of its level of impact on the environment and society and its related risk to the company itself. While a single company may be involved in multiple ESG-related incidents at any given time, Sustainalytics also scores companies based on the highest level of current involvement in ESG-related incidents, on a 0-100 scale, as follows: Exhibit 1 Sustainalytics Controversy Score Category Impact on Environment or Society Risk to Company Company Score 5 Severe Serious 0 4 High High 20 3 Significant Significant 50 2 Moderate Minimal 80 1 Low Negligible 99 0 No evidence of controversy None 100

Page 4 of 8 Because the presence of controversy is a negative contributor to a company s overall sustainability performance, Morningstar reverses the scale of company controversy scores when aggregating them to create a Portfolio Controversy score, as follows: n Where: MContra P = 100 w i SCont i MContra P = the Morningstar Portfolio Controversey Score SContra i = the Sustainalytics controversy score of company i i To receive a Portfolio Controversy Score, at least 67% of a portfolio s assets under management must have a company controversy score. Covered securities include equity and fixed-income securities issued by companies that have controversy scores. Securities issued by companies that do not have controversy scores, as well as short positions, options, and derivatives typically issued by third-party financial firms, are not covered. The percentage of assets of the covered securities will be rescaled to 100%. To calculate the Portfolio Sustainability Score, we rescale the Portfolio Controversy Score, creating the Portfolio Controversy Deduction, as follows: Exhibit 2 Portfolio Controversy Deduction Highest Controversy Level Portfolio Controversy Deduction Best 0 0 1 0.2 2 4 3 10 4 16 Worst 5 20 Morningstar Portfolio Sustainability Score To summarize, the Morningstar Portfolio Sustainability Score is calculated as: Portfolio Sustainability Score = Portfolio ESG Score Portfolio Controversy Deduction In order to receive a Morningstar Portfolio Sustainability Score, a portfolio must have a Portfolio ESG Score and a Portfolio Controversy Score.

Page 5 of 8 Morningstar Historical Portfolio Sustainability Score The Morningstar Historical Portfolio Sustainability Score is a weighted average of the trailing 12 months of Morningstar Portfolio Sustainability Scores. Historical portfolio scores are not equal-weighted; rather, more-recent portfolios are weighted more heavily than more-distant portfolios. The formula is below: Historical Portfolio Sustainability Score = 12 i=1 (12 i) Portfolio_Sustainability i 12 i i=1 Where: i = number of months from present Combining the trailing 12 months of portfolio scores adds consistency while still reflecting portfolio managers' current decisions by weighting the most recent portfolio scores more heavily. Morningstar Sustainability Rating Based on their Morningstar Historical Portfolio Sustainability Score, funds are assigned absolute category ranks and percent ranks within their Morningstar Global Categories, provided that a category has at least 30 funds with Portfolio Sustainability Scores. A fund s Morningstar Sustainability Rating is its normally distributed ordinal score and descriptive rank relative to the fund s global category. In order for a fund to receive a Morningstar Sustainability Rating, its Morningstar Global Category must have at least 30 funds with Historical Portfolio Sustainability Scores. Exhibit 3 summarizes the rating distribution. K Exhibit 3 Morningstar Sustainability Rating Distribution Score Descriptive Rank Rating Icon Highest 10% 5 High Next 22.5% 4 Above Average Next 35% 3 Average Next 22.5% 2 Below Average Lowest 10% 1 Low

Page 6 of 8 References Morningstar Global Category Classifications Methodology. 2015. http://corporate1.morningstar.com/researchlibrary/article/766880/morningstar-global-categoryclassifications Morningstar Category Classifications. 2016. http://im.mstar.com/im/newhomepage/morningstar_category_definitions_us_june_2016.pdf Sustainalytics Controversies Research. 2018. https://www.sustainalytics.com/controversies-research/#1482352879777-ebfb8fdd-0440

Page 7 of 8 Appendix A: Pillar Scores Portfolio E, S, and G Pillar Scores Sustainalytics company-level ESG scores can be disaggregated into three pillar scores--environmental, social, and governance. Morningstar calculates portfolio-level scores for each pillar, using the same method for normalizing scores that is used for the Portfolio ESG Score, described above. Scores are aggregated by using the peer group weighted contribution of the pillar, as follows: n Portfolio Pillar = Pillar Normalized Weightadj PeerPillarWeight x=1 This is necessary because the contribution of each pillar to a company s overall ESG Score may differ by peer group. Using the peer group-weighted contribution more accurately reflects the overall contribution of each pillar to a company s overall ESG Score. Morningstar Global Category Rank, Category Percent Rank, and Rank Description The Portfolio ESG Score and Portfolio Controversy Score will be assigned absolute category ranks, percent ranks, and normally distributed ordinal scores and descriptive ranks within their Morningstar Global Category, as follows: Exhibit 4 Portfolio ESG Scores Distribution Score Descriptive Rank Highest 10% 5 High Next 22.5% 4 Above Average Next 35% 3 Average Next 22.5% 2 Below Average Lowest 10% 1 Low Exhibit 4 Portfolio Controversy Scores Distribution Score Descriptive Rank Lowest 10% 5 Low Next 22.5% 4 Below Average Next 35% 3 Average Next 22.5% 2 Above Average Highest 10% 1 High

Page 8 of 8 About Morningstar Sustainability Research Morningstar Sustainability Research is dedicated to helping investors evaluate the values and impact of their investments. For More Information +1 312 696-6093 jon.hale@morningstar.com? 22 West Washington Street Chicago, IL 60602 USA 2018 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. Unless otherwise provided in a separate agreement, you may use this report only in the country in which its original distributor is based. The information, data, analyses, and opinions presented herein do not constitute investment advice; are provided solely for informational purposes and therefore are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete, or accurate. The opinions expressed are as of the date written and are subject to change without notice. Except as otherwise required by law, Morningstar shall not be responsible for any trading decisions, damages, or other losses resulting from, or related to, the information, data, analyses, or opinions or their use. The information contained herein is the proprietary property of Morningstar and may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, or used in any manner, without the prior written consent of Morningstar. To license the research, call +1 312 696-6869.