Cartesian Product of Two S-Valued Graphs

Similar documents
Fractional Graphs. Figure 1

Applied Mathematics Letters

A Fuzzy Vertex Graceful Labeling On Friendship and Double Star Graphs

Hyperidentities in (xx)y xy Graph Algebras of Type (2,0)

ON THE MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM SIZES OF A GRAPH

Palindromic Permutations and Generalized Smarandache Palindromic Permutations

A relation on 132-avoiding permutation patterns

Equivalence between Semimartingales and Itô Processes

Epimorphisms and Ideals of Distributive Nearlattices

Structural Induction

FUZZY PRIME L-FILTERS

Variations on a theme by Weetman

Fuzzy L-Quotient Ideals

Translates of (Anti) Fuzzy Submodules

Solutions of Bimatrix Coalitional Games

R. Selvi 1, P. Thangavelu 2. Sri Parasakthi College for Women Courtallam, INDIA 2 Department of Mathematics

Alain Hertz 1 and Sacha Varone 2. Introduction A NOTE ON TREE REALIZATIONS OF MATRICES. RAIRO Operations Research Will be set by the publisher

Homomorphism and Cartesian Product of. Fuzzy PS Algebras

Logic and Artificial Intelligence Lecture 25

Realizability of n-vertex Graphs with Prescribed Vertex Connectivity, Edge Connectivity, Minimum Degree, and Maximum Degree

An Application of Ramsey Theorem to Stopping Games

A NEW NOTION OF TRANSITIVE RELATIVE RETURN RATE AND ITS APPLICATIONS USING STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS. Burhaneddin İZGİ

CONGRUENCES AND IDEALS IN A DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICE WITH RESPECT TO A DERIVATION

Brouwer, A.E.; Koolen, J.H.

Essays on Some Combinatorial Optimization Problems with Interval Data

More On λ κ closed sets in generalized topological spaces

On the h-vector of a Lattice Path Matroid

Game Theory: Normal Form Games

On the Number of Permutations Avoiding a Given Pattern

Collinear Triple Hypergraphs and the Finite Plane Kakeya Problem

The Probabilistic Method - Probabilistic Techniques. Lecture 7: Martingales

Lecture 19: March 20

Some Remarks on Finitely Quasi-injective Modules

CATEGORICAL SKEW LATTICES

A Combinatorial Proof for the Circular Chromatic Number of Kneser Graphs

Secant Varieties, Symbolic Powers, Statistical Models

Distributed Function Calculation via Linear Iterations in the Presence of Malicious Agents Part I: Attacking the Network

THE NUMBER OF UNARY CLONES CONTAINING THE PERMUTATIONS ON AN INFINITE SET

NOTES ON (T, S)-INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SUBHEMIRINGS OF A HEMIRING

A Property Equivalent to n-permutability for Infinite Groups

COMBINATORIAL CONVOLUTION SUMS DERIVED FROM DIVISOR FUNCTIONS AND FAULHABER SUMS

Interpolation of κ-compactness and PCF

Strong Subgraph k-connectivity of Digraphs

Laurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA

Solution of Black-Scholes Equation on Barrier Option

The generalized 3-connectivity of Cartesian product graphs

ON A PROBLEM BY SCHWEIZER AND SKLAR

American Foreign Exchange Options and some Continuity Estimates of the Optimal Exercise Boundary with respect to Volatility

Laurence Boxer and Ismet KARACA

BINOMIAL TRANSFORMS OF QUADRAPELL SEQUENCES AND QUADRAPELL MATRIX SEQUENCES

Best-Reply Sets. Jonathan Weinstein Washington University in St. Louis. This version: May 2015

Computing Unsatisfiable k-sat Instances with Few Occurrences per Variable

Lattices and the Knaster-Tarski Theorem

CONSTRUCTION OF CODES BY LATTICE VALUED FUZZY SETS. 1. Introduction. Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 35, No. 2, 2005,

Lecture 6. 1 Polynomial-time algorithms for the global min-cut problem

Comparing Partial Rankings

Discrete Random Variables

Handout 4: Deterministic Systems and the Shortest Path Problem

A Theory of Value Distribution in Social Exchange Networks

Discrete Random Variables

A Theory of Value Distribution in Social Exchange Networks

MAT 4250: Lecture 1 Eric Chung

Outline Introduction Game Representations Reductions Solution Concepts. Game Theory. Enrico Franchi. May 19, 2010

Playing games with transmissible animal disease. Jonathan Cave Research Interest Group 6 May 2008

6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 10: Introduction to Game Theory 2

OPTIMAL PORTFOLIO CONTROL WITH TRADING STRATEGIES OF FINITE

CS792 Notes Henkin Models, Soundness and Completeness

The illustrated zoo of order-preserving functions

Finding optimal arbitrage opportunities using a quantum annealer

All Equilibrium Revenues in Buy Price Auctions

Algorithmic Game Theory and Applications. Lecture 11: Games of Perfect Information

Game Theory. Lecture Notes By Y. Narahari. Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, India October 2012

Fuzzy Mean-Variance portfolio selection problems

Greek parameters of nonlinear Black-Scholes equation

TWIST UNTANGLE AND RELATED KNOT GAMES

TWO-PERIODIC TERNARY RECURRENCES AND THEIR BINET-FORMULA 1. INTRODUCTION

Forecast Horizons for Production Planning with Stochastic Demand

Wada s Representations of the. Pure Braid Group of High Degree

Skew lattices of matrices in rings

Single Machine Inserted Idle Time Scheduling with Release Times and Due Dates

Managing Default Contagion in Financial Networks

4 Martingales in Discrete-Time

The Binomial Theorem and Consequences

Coordination Games on Graphs

Finite Memory and Imperfect Monitoring

Pricing Exotic Options Under a Higher-order Hidden Markov Model

A THREE-FACTOR CONVERGENCE MODEL OF INTEREST RATES

Computing Unsatisfiable k-sat Instances with Few Occurrences per Variable

Quadrant marked mesh patterns in 123-avoiding permutations

Math 167: Mathematical Game Theory Instructor: Alpár R. Mészáros

American Option Pricing Formula for Uncertain Financial Market

Andreas Wagener University of Vienna. Abstract

Numerical Solution of BSM Equation Using Some Payoff Functions

1 Maximizing profits when marginal costs are increasing

Lecture Note Set 3 3 N-PERSON GAMES. IE675 Game Theory. Wayne F. Bialas 1 Monday, March 10, N-Person Games in Strategic Form

Fuzzy Join - Semidistributive Lattice

6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 3: Strategic Form Games - Solution Concepts

Virtual Demand and Stable Mechanisms

ON THE LATTICE OF ORTHOMODULAR LOGICS

Optimal Allocation of Policy Limits and Deductibles

Transcription:

Global Journal of Mathematical Sciences: Theory and Practical. ISSN 0974-3200 Volume 9, Number 3 (2017), pp. 347-355 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Cartesian Product of Two S-Valued Graphs M.Sundar * and M.Chandramouleeswaran ** * Sree Sowdambika College Of Engineering, Aruppukottai-626101, India. ** Saiva Bhanu Kshatriya College, Aruppukottai 626101, India. Abstract Motivated by the study of products in crisp graph theory and the notion of S- valued graphs, in this paper, we study the concept of cartesian product of two S-valued graphs. Key words: Graph operations, Product of graphs, Semiring, S-valued graphs, vertex regularity, edge regularity. AMS classifications: 05C76, 16Y60, 05C25 1. INTRODUCTION Studies of how particular graphical parameters interact with graph products have lead several areas of research in graph theory. For example Shannon's capacity of a graph and Hedetniemi's coloring conjecture for the categorical product [6]. One of the oldest unsolved problems -Vizing's conjecture, also comes from the area of graph products. Algebraic graph theory can be viewed as an extension of graph theory in which algebraic methods are applied to problems about graphs [1]. Recently in [5] the authors have defined the concept of semiring valued graphs called S-valued graphs. In [3] they have studied the notion of regularity on S-valued graphs. In [2] the authors have studied the concept of vertex dominating set on S-valued graphs. Motivated by this, in this paper, we introduce the concept of cartesian product of two S-valued graphs and study some of its properties.

348 M.Sundarand M.Chandramouleeswaran 2. PRELIMINARIES In this section, we recall the basic definitions that are needed for our work. Definition 2.1. [6] The Cartesian product of G and H is a graph, denoted by G H whose vertex set is V(G) V(H). Two vertices (g, h) and (g, h ) are adjacent if g = g and hh E(H) or gg E(G) and h = h. Thus V(G H) = {(g, h) g V(G) and h V(H)}, E(G H) = {(g, h)(g, h ) g = g, hh E(H)orgg E(G), h = h } Definition 2.2. [4] A semiring (s, +, ) is an algebraic system with a non-empty set S together with two binary operations + and such that (1) (S, +, ) is a monoid. (2) (S, ) is a semigroup. (3) For all a, b, c S, a (b + c) = a b + a c and (a + b). c = a c + b c (4) 0 x = x 0 = 0 for all x S. The element 0 in S is called the additive identity as well as the zero of the semiring S. Definition 2.3.[4] Let (s, +, )be a semiring. is said to be a canonical pre-order if for a, b S, a b if and only if there exists an element c S such that a + c = b. Definition 2.4. [5] Let G = (V, E V V) be a given graph with V, E. For any semiring(s, + ), a semiring valued graph (or a S-valued graph) G S is defined to be the graph G S = (V, E, σ, ) where σ: V S and E S is defined by (x, y) = { min{σ(x), σ(y)} if σ(x) σ(y) or σ(y) σ(x) 0 otherwise For every unordered pair (x, y) of E V V.we call σ, a S-vertex set and a S-edge set of the S-valued graph G S. Definition 2.5. [5] Let G S = (V, E, σ, ) be a S-valued graph. Then the graph H S = (P, L, τ, γ) is called a S-subgraph of G S if P V, L E, τ σ and γ.that is τ σ τ(x) σ(x), x P and γ γ(x, y) (x, y), (x, y) L P P. H S is called a S-sub graph of G S is induced by P if τ(x) = σ(x) for every x P and γ(x, y) = (x, y) for every (x, y) L. Definition 2.6.[5] The open neighbourhood of v i in G S is defined as N S (v i ) = {(v j, σ(v j )), where (v i, v j ) E, (v i, v j ) S } and the closed neighbourhood of v i in G S is defined as the set N S [v i ] = N S (v i ) {(v i, σ(v i ))}.

Cartesian Product of Two S-Valued Graphs 349 Definition 2.7. [5] The degree of a vertex v i of the S-valued graph G S is defined as deg s (v i ) = ( v j N S (v i ) (v i v j ), d(v i )) where d(v i ) is the number of edges incident with v i. Definition 2.8. [5] A S-valued graph G S is said to be vertex degree regular S-valued graph ( d S - vertex regular graph) if deg S (v) = (a, n), for all v V and some a S and n Z +. Definition 2.9. [5] G S = (V, E, σ, ) be a S-valued graph. If σ(x) = a, x V and for some a S then the corresponding S-valued graph G S is called a vertex regular S-valued graph (or simply vertex regular). G S is said to be edge regular S-valued graph (simply edge regular) if (x, y) = a (x, y) E and for some a S. G S is said to be a regular S-valued graph (S-regular) if it is both vertex regular and edge regular S-valued graph. Definition 2.10. [5] A graph G S is said to be (a, k) regular if the underlying crisp graph G is k-regular and σ(v) = a, v V. 3. CARTESIAN PRODUCT OF TWO S-VALUED GRAPHS In this section, we introduce the notion of Cartesian product of two S-valued graphs, illustrate with some examples, and prove simple properties. Definition 3.1. LetG 1 S = (V 1, E 1 σ 1 1 ) where V 1 = {v i 1 i p 1 }, E 1 V 1 V 1 and G 2 S = (V 2, E 2 σ 2 2 ) where V 2 = {v 2 1 j p 2 }E 2 V 2 V 2 be two given S-valued graphs. V 1 V 2 = {w ij = (v i, u j ) 1 i p 1, 1 j p 2 }; E 1 E 2 V 1 V 2. The Cartesian product of two S-valued graphs G 1 S and G 2 S is a graph defined as G S = G 1 S G 2 S = (V = V 1 V 2, E = E 1 E 2, σ = σ 1 σ 2, = 1 2 ), where V = {w ij = (v i, u j ) v i V 1 and u j V 2 and two vertices w ij and w kl are adjacent if i = k and u j u l E 2 or j = l and v i v k E 1. Define σ: V S by σ(w ij ) = min {σ 1 (v i ), σ 2 (u j )} and : E S by (e ij kl ) = ((v i, u j ), (v k, u l )) = { min{σ 1(v i ), 2 (u j, u l )} if i = k and u j u l E 2 min{ 1 (v i, v k ), σ 2 (u j )} if j = l and v i v k E 1

350 M.Sundarand M.Chandramouleeswaran Example 3.2. Consider the semiring S = ({0, a, b, c}, +, )with the binary operations + and defined by the following Cayley tables. + 0 a b c 0 0 a b c a a b c c b b c c c c c c c c In S we define a canonical pre-order as follows: 0 0, 0 a, 0 b, 0 c, a a, b b, c c, a b, a c, b c. Consider the two S-valued graphs G 1 S and G 2 S Then the Cartesian product G S = G 1 S G 2 S is given by G 1 S G 2 S = (V, E, σ, ) where V = {w 11, w 12, w 13, w 21, w 22, w 23, }, 0 a b c 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a b c b 0 b c c c 0 c c c E = {e 21 11, e 12 11, e 13 11, e 22 12, e 13 12, e 23 13, e 22 21, e 23 21, e 23 22 } Theorem 3.3.The Cartesian product of two S-regular graphs is S-regular. Proof:Let G 1 S = (V 1, E 1 σ 1 1 ) and G 2 S = (V 2, E 2 σ 2 2 ) be two given S-regular graphs. Claim:G S = G 1 S G2 S is S-regular. Now by definition σ(w ij ) = min{σ 1 (v i ), σ 2 (u j )} = { σ 1(v i ) if σ 1 (v i ) σ 2 (u j ) σ 2 (u j ) if σ 2 (u j ) σ 1 (v i ) Then in both the cases σ(w ij ) is equal for all w ij V, 1 i p 1, 1 j p 2. This implies that G S = G 1 S G 2 S is vertex S-regular.

Cartesian Product of Two S-Valued Graphs 351 Further, (e ij kl ) = { min{σ 1(v i ), 2 (u j, u l )} if i = k and u j u l E 2 min{ 1 (v i, v k ), σ 2 (u j )} if j = l and v i v k E 1 = min{σ 1 (v i ), σ 2 (u j )} = { σ 1(v i ) if σ 1 (v i ) σ 2 (u j ) σ 2 (u j ) if σ 2 (u j ) σ 1 (v i ) 1 i, k p 1, 1 j, l p 2 This implies that G S = G 1 S G 2 S is edge S-regular. Thus the Cartesian product G 1 S G 2 S is S-regular. Remark 3.4.The converse of the above theorem need not be true in general as seen in example 3.2. Moreover consider the following example. From the above example we observe that even if one of the S-valued graph is S- regular the product need not be S-regular. This leads to the following theorem. Theorem 3.5. The product of two S-valued graphs is S-regular if the S-value corresponding to the S-regular graph is minimum among the S-values. Proof: Let G S = G 1 S G 2 S be S-regular. Then σ(w ij ) = min{σ 1 (v i ), σ 2 (u j )} = a, i, j. (3.1) Sinceσ 1 (v i ), σ 2 (u j ) S, i, j either σ 1 (v i ) σ 2 (u j ) or σ 2 (u j ) σ 1 (v i ). By 3.1 if σ 1 (v i ) σ 2 (u j ), i, j σ 1 (v i ) = a, i (3.2) and if σ 2 (u j ) σ 1 (v i ) i, j σ 2 (u j ) = a, j (3.3) Now consider any edge e ij kl. By definition (e ij kl ) = { min{σ 1(v i ), 2 (u j, u l )} if i = k and u j u l E 2 min{ 1 (v i, v k ), σ 2 (u j )} if j = l and v i v k E 1

352 M.Sundarand M.Chandramouleeswaran = { min{σ 1(v i ), min{σ 2 (u j ), σ 2 (u l )}} if i = k and u j u l E 2 min{ min{σ 1 (v i ), σ 1 (v k )}, σ 2 (u j )} if j = l and v i v k E 1 = min {σ 1 (v i ), σ 2 (u j )} ifσ 2 (u j ) σ 2 (u l ) {σ 1 (v i ), σ 2 (u l )} ifσ 2 (u l ) σ 2 (u j ) {σ 1 (v i ), σ 2 (u j )} ifσ 1 (v i ) σ 1 (v k ) {{σ 1 (v k ), σ 2 (u j )} ifσ 1 (v k ) σ 1 (v i ) (3.4) Among all the cases we obtain either σ 1 (v i ) or σ 2 (u j ) and both are equal to a, which is minimum among the S-values. This proves that G S is S-regular whenever the S-value corresponding to the S-regular graph is minimum. Remark 3.6.Product of two vertex S-regular graph is edge S-regular. But the converse is not true. Clearly G S is edge S-regular but not vertex S-regular. Example 3.7.The Cartesian product of two edge S-regular graphs is not edge S- regular. Consider the following two edge regular S-graphs.

Cartesian Product of Two S-Valued Graphs 353 It is clear thatg 1 S G 2 S is not edge S-regular. Theorem 3.8. The Cartesian product of two edge S-regular graphs is edge S-regular only if 1 (e i k ) = 2 (e j l ) for 1 i, k p 1, 1 j, l p 2. Proof:Let G 1 S be S-edge regular then 1 (e i k ) = min{σ 1 (v i ), σ 1 (v k )} = { σ 1(v i ) if σ 1 (v i ) σ 1 (v k ) σ 1 (v k ) if σ 1 (v k ) σ 1 (v i ) (3.5) Let G 2 S be S-edge regular then 2 (e j l ) = min{σ 2 (u j ), σ 2 (u l )} = { σ 2(u j ) if σ 2 (u j ) σ 2 (u l ) σ 2 (u l ) if σ 2 (u l ) σ 2 (u j ) (3.6) Now (e ij kl ) = { min{σ 1(v i ), 2 (u j, u l )} if i = k and u j u l E 2 min{ 1 (v i, v k ), σ 2 (u j )} if j = l and v i v k E 1 = { min{σ 1(v i ), min{σ 2 (u j ), σ 2 (u l )}} if i = k and u j u l E 2 min{ min{σ 1 (v i ), σ 1 (v k )}, σ 2 (u j )} if j = l and v i v k E 1 = min {σ 1 (v i ), σ 2 (u j )} ifσ 2 (u j ) σ 2 (u l ) {σ 1 (v i ), σ 2 (u l )} ifσ 2 (u l ) σ 2 (u j ) {σ 1 (v i ), σ 2 (u j )} ifσ 1 (v i ) σ 1 (v k ) {{σ 1 (v k ), σ 2 (u j )} ifσ 1 (v k ) σ 1 (v i ) From 3.5 and 3.6 we observe that G S isedge S-regular only whenσ 1 (v i ) = σ 2 (u j ) and σ 1 (v k ) = σ 2 (u l ) i, j, k, l

354 M.Sundarand M.Chandramouleeswaran Thus for G S to be edge S-regular, we must have 1 (e i k ) = 2 (e j l ) for 1 i, k p 1, 1 j, l p 2. Example 3.9.The Cartesian product of two d S -regular graph is not d S -regular. Consider the following two d S -regular graphs G 1 S and G 2 S. We observe that G S is not d S -regular. Theorem 3.10.If G S 1 is (a, m) regular and G S 2 is (b, n) regular graph then their Cartesian product G S is either (a, m + n) regular or (b, m + n) regular. Proof:Let G S 1 be (a, m) regular and G S 2 be (b, n) regular for some a, b S and m, n Z + To prove:g S is (a, m + n) regular or (b, m + n) regular. That is to prove G S is vertex S-regular and d(w ij ) = m + n for all i. j. By theorem 3.3, G S is vertex S-regular. Further, the number of edges incident with w ij in G S is equal to the number of edges incident with v i in G S 1 + number of edges incident with u j in G S 2. That is, d(w ij ) = d(v i ) + d(u j ) = m + n = k (say) i, j Thus G S is (a, k) regular. 4. CONCLUSION Motivated by the study of S-valued graphs in [3] and [5], we studied the regularity and degree regularity conditions on the cartesian product of two S-valued graphs. In future, we have proposed to study the notions of minimal and maximal degree and their properties on G S.

Cartesian Product of Two S-Valued Graphs 355 REFERENCES [1] Chris Godsil and Gordon Royle:Algebraic Graph Theory, Springer, 2001. [2] Jeyalakshmi. S. and Chandramouleeswaran. M: Vertex Domination on S- Valued graphs, IOSR Journal of Mathematics., Vol 12, 2016, PP 08-12. [3] Jeyalakshmi. S, Rajkumar. M, and Chandramouleeswaran. M: Regularity on S-valued graphs, Global J. of Pure and Applied Maths., Vol 2(5), 2015, 2971-2978. [4] Jonathan S Golan: Semirings and Their Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London. [5] Rajkumar. M, Jeyalakshmi. S. and Chandramouleeswaran. M: Semiring Valued Graphs, International Journal of Math.Sci. and Engg. Appls., Vol. 9 (3), 2015 pp. 141-152. [6] Richard Hammack, Wilfried Imrich and Sandy Klavzar: Handbook of Product Graphs, University of Ljubljana and University of Maribor, Slovenia.

356 M.Sundarand M.Chandramouleeswaran