POLAND. AT A GLANCE: Gross bilateral ODA (unless otherwise shown)

Similar documents
Official web site of the Ministry:

BELGIUM. AT A GLANCE: Gross bilateral ODA (unless otherwise shown)

The DAC s main findings and recommendations. Extract from: OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews

EuropeAid. Presentation to Serbia Brussels, July, 2014

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the new European Consensus on Development

THE NETHERLANDS. AT A GLANCE: Gross bilateral ODA (unless otherwise shown)

Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals in the European Union. Focus on development cooperation. Carlos BERROZPE GARCÍA

June with other international donors including emerging to raise their level of ambition in line with that of the EU

Koos Richelle Director General of EuropeAid

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 18 May /09 DEVGEN 150 RELEX 475 ACP 124 FIN 187 WTO 106

14684/16 YML/sv 1 DGC 1

DFID s Vision of Aid Effectiveness

Written Evidence for the Scottish Parliament European & External Relations Committee

Introduction

Programming Aid Instruments

Private Sector and development: a global responsibility?

The DAC s main findings and recommendations. Extract from: OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews

GUIDELINES FOR STRATEGIES IN SWEDISH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

The role of the EU in international cooperation

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 77/77

At its meeting on 12 December 2013, the Council (Foreign Affairs/Development) adopted the Conclusions set out in the Annex to this note.

A stronger role of the private sector in achieving inclusive and sustainable growth in developing countries

The role of the private sector in EU development policy

Follow-up by the European Commission to the EU-ACP JPA on the resolution on private sector development strategy, including innovation, for sustainable

The DAC s main findings and recommendations. Extract from: OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews

8822/16 YML/ik 1 DG C 1

CONCORD Principles for the EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) ???

72 ND REGULAR MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE OF PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVES TO UNITED NATIONS HUMAN SETTLEMENTS PROGRAMME 10 APRIL 2019

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 11 May /10 ECOFIN 249 ENV 265 POLGEN 69

8959/18 YML/ik 1 DG C 1B

MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR LDCs: A FRAMEWORK FOR AID QUALITY AND BEYOND

Council conclusions on the review of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region

2018 ECOSOC Forum on FfD Zero Draft

ACP-EU JOINT PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY

Financing for Development Conference The Addis Tax Initiative Declaration

Mutual Accountability Introduction and Summary of Recommendations:

Climate Financing by Luxembourg 1

Table of Recommendations

THE NETHERLANDS Donor Profile

FRANCE. AT A GLANCE 1 : Gross bilateral ODA (unless otherwise shown) 1 Source: OECD-DAC. At a glance statistics not yet available for 2015.

The. Busan Commitments. An Analysis of EU Progress and Performance

COUNTRIES OF WORK EXPERIENCE:

DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION REPORT 2010

Global ODA Trends. Topics

Council conclusions on "First Annual Report to the European Council on EU Development Aid Targets"

DGC 1B EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 13 September 2017 (OR. en) 2016/0281 (COD) PE-CONS 43/17

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL

Council conclusions on the EU role in Global Health. 3011th FOREIGN AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 10 May 2010

ANNEX V. Action Document for Conflict Prevention, Peacebuilding and Crisis Preparedness support measures

2011 SURVEY ON MONITORING THE PARIS DECLARATION

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 15 May /07 DEVGEN 89 ACP 94 RELEX 347

9644/10 YML/ln 1 DG E II

OVERVIEW OF INITIATIVES RELATED TO CLIMATE FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS

SURVEY GUIDANCE CONTENTS Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness

Sendai Targets and Indicators A roadmap for implementation Target F

At its meeting on 26 May 2015, the Council adopted the Council conclusions as set out in the annex to this note.

5. Ireland is Countering Aggressive Tax Planning

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation

Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 February 2017 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

15559/16 YML/it 1 DGC 1

Sudan. Sudan is a lower-middle income country with a gross national income (GNI) of USD 1 220

From: Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2013 Responsible Business Conduct in Action

Organisation strategy for Sweden s cooperation with the Green Climate Fund for

YES NO NOT SURE NOT APPLICABLE MOST IMPORTANT IMPORTANT. 1.2 If YES, please rate the importance of the following driving forces behind these changes:

9334/11 ADD 5 YML/ln 1 TEFS

WIDER Development Conference September 2018: Aid Policy Continuity or Change? Richard Manning

This action is funded by the European Union

At its meeting on 19 May 2014, the Council (Foreign Affairs/Development) adopted the Conclusions set out in the Annex to this note.

EN 1 EN. Annex. Sector Policy Support Programme: Sector budget support (centralised management) DAC-code Sector Trade related adjustments

Luxembourg High-level Symposium: Preparing for the 2012 DCF

TRADE, FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT DID YOU KNOW THAT...?

Delegations will find in the Annex to this note the above Council Conclusions, which were adopted by the Council on 23 May 2011.

SUBMISSION BY DENMARK AND THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES

TOSSD AND TYPES OF AID INVOLVING NO CROSS-BORDER RESOURCE FLOWS

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR EU-PCD REPORT 2015: CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MEMBER STATES

UGANDA PARTNERSHIP POLICY

Development effectiveness through HLM. Trialog Study visit 2014

Betty Ngoma, Assistant Director Aid coordination Magdalena Kouneva, Technical Advisor Development Effectiveness

Save the Children s Input to the Zero Draft of the Outcome of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development

VADEMECUM ON FINANCING IN THE FRAME OF THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP

OPEAN OFFICE KAS BRUSSELS

TREATY SERIES 2015 Nº 5

CE TEXTE N'EST DISPONIBLE QU'EN VERSION ANGLAISE

Beyond Accra: What action should DFID take to meet our Paris and Accra commitments on aid effectiveness by 2010?

Official Journal of the European Union DECISIONS

Coherence Report Insights from the External Evaluation of the External Financing Instruments Final Report - Annexes July 2017

Inter-agency Task Force on Financing for Development Background Note on Progress towards the 2018 Task Force Report February 2018

DECLARATION ON CURBING ILLICIT FINANCIAL FLOWS THROUGH GOOD FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE

GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PROGRAMMES

What funding for EU external action after 2013?

Summary and Recommendations by the Standing Committee on Finance on the 2016 Biennial Assessment and Overview of Climate Finance Flows

2014 September. Trends in donor spending on gender in development. Introduction.

EVALUATION WORK PROGRAMME FOR STRATEGIC EVALUATIONS

Public financial management is an essential part of the development process.

EU Foreign Development Policy

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS

ANNEX. 1. IDENTIFICATION Beneficiary CRIS/ABAC Commitment references Total cost EU Contribution Budget line. Turkey IPA/2017/40201

Aid effectiveness DFID Tanzania May Owen Barder These slides are at

An analysis of the Climate Finance Reporting of the European Union

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 77/95

Transcription:

POLAND AT A GLANCE: Gross bilateral ODA 2013 2014 (unless otherwise shown) 1

POLICY FRAMEWORK Poland s development cooperation is guided by the Act on Development Co-operation, approved in September 2011 1 and amended in November 2013 to broaden the definition of development cooperation. The act reformed the cooperation policy and the responsibilities within the government. The development cooperation policy is under the responsibility of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Since July 2012, the Development Cooperation Department (DCD), operating as Polish Aid, is responsible for planning, coordinating, monitoring and evaluating activities that fall within the scope of development cooperation and humanitarian aid. The DCD s responsibilities include, in particular, drafting priorities of Polish development cooperation, organizing calls for development project proposals and representing Poland in EU bodies as regards EU development cooperation policy. The act also established an advisory and consultative body, the Development Cooperation Programme Board. Its tasks include tabling geographical and thematic priorities for development cooperation, assessing draft annual and multiannual development cooperation programmes, evaluating Government administration bodies' annual reports on fulfilling development cooperation tasks and issuing opinions on development cooperation documents drafted by the Government. The Multi-annual Development Cooperation Programme (2012-2015) defined the Polish development cooperation priorities and actions until 2015. The Programme is implemented through annual plans approved by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The new Multiannual Development Cooperation Programme 2016 2020 will focus the actions of Polish development cooperation on fewer partner countries in order to increase its results. Other Ministries participate in activities related to development cooperation and humanitarian aid, e. g. the Ministry of Finance for aid provided through international and multilateral agencies and the Ministry of Defence for aid to conflict areas. Finally, Poland joined the Development Aid Committee in DAC and is now implementing the main recommendations of the technical review, i.a. the strengthening of Poland s evaluation and monitoring systems. Poland s development cooperation policy is framed within the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the Accra Agenda for Action (AAA). Principles set up within the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation process and included in the Busan outcome document are taken into account during the implementation of Polish development cooperation. It applies particularly to the following areas: ownership of development priorities by developing countries, reducing of fragmentation, transparency, inclusive development partnerships (cooperation with CSOs). 1 http://www.polishaid.gov.pl/files/aktualnosci2011/polish_development%20cooperation%20act_2011.pdf 2

Poland recognises the importance of Policy Coherence for Development. This principle was incorporated into the new Multiannual Development Cooperation Programme 2016 2020. This document creates political commitment for ministries, which are obliged to respect PCD and assess the impact of sectoral policies (regulations) on developing countries. The fight against illicit financial flows was established as the Polish priority area in PCD. Official web site of the Ministry: http://www.polishaid.gov.pl Policy documents on Development Cooperation: http://www.polishaid.gov.pl/files/aktualnosci2011/polish_development%20cooperation%2 0Act_2011.pdf http://www.polishaid.gov.pl/files/dokumenty_publikacje/pw_en-po_reas.pdf 1. DOMESTIC PUBLIC FINANCE FOR DEVELOPMENT 1.1. DOMESTIC RESOURCE MOBILISATION - New initiatives to support tax reforms: In order to strengthen country systems and support capacity building in the area of reducing illicit financial flows the Ministry of Finance provides technical assistance related to tax administration. It also hosts annual events for members of the Intra-European Organisation of Tax Administrations (IOTA). - Share of Domestic Resource Mobilisation in PFM: Strong public financial management (PFM) systems are essential for effective and sustainable economic management and public service delivery. Good PFM systems are also indispensable for ensuring that aid is being used to achieve development goals. Poland implements projects regarding this area with the aim to strengthen developing countries' capacity to better manage their public finances, e.g.: Narodowy Bank Polski (National Bank of Poland, NBP) Technical Cooperation Programme (TC Programme) is addressed to officials representing central banks and institutions with competencies similar to NBP s from countries outside the European Union. The main goal of the TC Programme is to exchange NBP s knowledge, views and experience on various aspects of central banking with these institutions and to support the development of their institutional capacities. The TC programme covers, inter alia, such topics as: monetary policy and its instruments, foreign exchange reserves management, payment systems, financial stability, balance of payments statistics, economic education, security systems in a central bank, internal audit, legal aspects of central banking, public contracts in central banks, business continuity management in the central bank, the fight against money laundering and financing of terrorism. Apart from its own TC Programme, NBP develops cooperation with international institutions by participating in assistance programs carried out and/or financed by the International Monetary Fund (missions), the European Commission (twinning projects) and other central banks. 3

Moreover in March 2015 Poland together with Denmark, Sweden and The Netherlands submitted a joint letter to EU High Representative Mogherini and Commissioner Mimica concerning abolishing tax exemptions in Government-to-Government aid. This initiative is aimed at strengthening domestic resource mobilisation in the countries where aid is provided. Moreover, the thematic priorities of good governance and rule of law of the new Multiannual Program of Development Cooperation (2016 2020) will make it possible to continue projects on DRM. - Poland has ratified, is a member of and/or supported: (i) The United Nations Convention against Corruption (Merida); (ii) the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Officials in International Business Transactions, and (iii) the OECD Recommendation on Bribery and Officially Supported Export Credits. Furthermore, (i) it committed to early adoption of the Common Reporting Standard developed by the OECD within the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information; (ii) supported the OECD Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting; and (iii) supported the Council of Europe/OECD Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters. 1.2. MAINTAINING SUSTAINABLE DEBT LEVELS - Support mechanisms: none reported. - Actions taken in 2014: none reported. - No specific interventions were made or are planned to prevent aggressive litigation against HIPCs. 2. PRIVATE FINANCE FOR DEVELOPMENT - CSR: - Polish government assumes the role of an intermediary between business and society in the discussion on responsibility for social and environmental issues. The government is working to achieve effective coordination of activities undertaken in this area to provide partners with a platform for the dialogue. The CSR Advisory Board of the Minister of Economy established in July 2014 creates a space for exchange of information, knowledge and good practices between public administration, business and civil society in the aim of promotion of sustainable development and CSR. Ensuring effective communication and intensifying dialogue between the government, social partners and business representatives is seen as crucial. - Working Group on Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) within the CSR Advisory Board was appointed with the aim of developing recommendations or guidelines on the implementation of the principles of sustainable consumption and production. So far, the Working Group has discussed the following issues: measuring the environmental performance of products and organizations including dissemination of information on measures taken at EU level to develop a uniform method for assessing the impact of technological and environmental organizations; dissemination of 4

information on international aspects of cooperation in the context of SCP, including in the framework of the UN 10YFP on SCP; the need of developing recommendations on the implementation of the principles of SCP in particular industries and subsequent stages of the supply chain. - The CSR Advisory Board is also a platform for dissemination of information on the public consultation documents such as ILO-OECD Draft Guidance For Responsible Agricultural Supply Chains or information on activities of the European Commission and OECD regarding responsible supply chain in the textile and garment sector. - Working Group on CSR trends monitoring within the CSR Advisory Board was established to prepare recommendations to the Ministry of Finance that is responsible for the transposition of the Directive 2014/95/EU that entered into force on 6 December 2014. The Directive amends the existing accounting rules on the transparency of some large companies in relation to the disclosure of non-financial information. A handbook for the companies regarding the Directive will be prepared on the basis of the Working Group recommendations. - Remittances: none reported for 2014. 5

- Trade and development: Poland, AfT Commitments (in thousand EUR) 2010 2011 2012 2013 Trade-Related Assistance (TRA) Trade Policy and Regulations n/a 28 5 0 (category 1) Trade Development n/a 312 130 0 (category 2) Other Trade Related Needs n/a 0 0 0 (category 6) Total Trade-Related Assistance n/a 340 135 0 Wider Aid for Trade Agenda (AfT) Trade Policy and Regulations n/a 28 5 0 (category 1) Trade Related Infrastructure n/a 1 901 384 803 (category 3) Building Productive Capacity n/a 850 101 1 806 (category 4) Trade Related Adjustment n/a 0 0 0 (category 5) Other Trade Related Needs n/a 0 579 0 (category 6) Total Aid for Trade n/a 2 779 1069 2 609 Sources: OECD CRS Database, EU annual questionnaire on FfD for 2014 3. INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC FINANCE FOR DEVELOPMENT 3.1. OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE ODA individual commitments /gap to agreed targets (total ODA, Africa, LDCs) - In 2014, ODA decreased to EUR 340 million, representing 0.09 % of Poland s GNI. - To reach its individual ODA target of 0.33% of GNI by 2015, the country would need to increase its aid by EUR 816 million, over its projected increase of EUR 169 million. 6

Source: OECD DAC Online EU annual questionnaire on FfD for 2014 - "Realistic, verifiable actions for meeting individual ODA commitments until 2015" taken in 2014: none reported. - Measures taken or planned to contribute to the EU27 target to channel at least 50% of EU collective ODA increase to Africa: Poland participates in co-financing of the 11th edition of EDF that is the main instrument of financing cooperation between the European Union and the African, Caribbean and Pacific countries. Majority of assistance is dedicated to Africa. As far as our bilateral assistance is concerned Poland continues to provide ODA to the African countries by NGOs and Polish embassies (responsible for implementing projects financed from the so called Small Grant System in these countries. In 2014 Poland provided ODA to the East African countries (Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Ruanda, Somalia, Southern Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda) to support their sustainable development and to North African countries (Tunisia, Libya) to assist in the transformation processes. Poland declared that it will not be able to reach the target of 0.15%-0.20% ODA/GNI to LDCs by 2010 (and onwards). Poland co-finances 11th EDF, provides contribution to the EU ODA budget and continues to assist bilaterally LDCs. All these efforts taken together should contribute to achieving the collective EU target on LDCs. Moreover, Poland increased its contribution to the 11th edition of EDF. 3.2. FUNDING FOR TACKLING CLIMATE CHANGE - Due to the fact that Poland is non-annex 2 Party it does not have an obligation to provide climate finance. To the extent possible Poland have channelled some climate finance in the past and has general intention to continue this trend. However due to the 7

lack of aforementioned obligation Poland does not have this aspect of international financing clearly defined in its budgetary planning. 3.3. FUNDING FOR ADDRESSING BIODIVERSITY CHALLENGES - None reported for 2014. 3.4. TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFER - Projects in 2014: Poland provided funding to international organisations (UNIDO, UNESCO, WIPO, OECD, ICAD, ITU) in matters somehow related to technology and supported educational, knowledge transfer and training activities to some administrations. Support to student exchange from Eastern European countries. Furthermore, Poland funded specific actions to support sustainable development through STI, including technology development and transfer, in developing countries: these include initiatives aimed at Armenia and Georgia. 4. COMBINING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE FINANCE FOR DEVELOPMENT - Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Poland and PAIiIZ (Polish Information and Foreign Investment Agency) organised a seminar on European Business Cooperation on Third Markets in December 2014. One of the panels concerned development policy in the context of private sector engagement in Africa. The aim of the seminar was to promote private sector engagement in development cooperation and a multi-stakeholders approach to the SDGs. 5. USING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE MORE EFFECTIVELY - Aid effectiveness strategy: In 2012 Poland prepared the Implementation Schedule for the Common Standard. It was published on the OECD website. The principle of aid effectiveness was introduced in the Multiannual Development Cooperation Programme for 2016 2020. - Country ownership: Poland does not provide budget support. Poland used local PFM for less than 10% of its spending and kept tied aid at below 10%. Building governance and strengthening public administration and local government is one of the priorities of Poland s development assistance. 24 projects have been initiated to support the systemic transformation and regional development, strengthening public administration and local government, and to support finance management, with total volume of 6.2 million PLN. Poland is elaborating a new multiannual development cooperation programme for 2016-2020. In this process the Busan principle regarding country ownership will be respected. Poland will take into account national development strategies of partner countries. Poland will strive to align its priority development sectors with priority development goals in partner countries - Transparency: With regard to the implementation of the Common Standard, Poland is working on a new system providing information on the Polish ODA with the support of 8

DG DEVCO. The newly created repository of implemented development projects is available on the official Polish Aid website. - Mutual accountability arrangements account for over 80% of Poland s priority countries. - Focus on results: Poland participates in country-level results frameworks processes and platforms in 50-80% of its priority countries and actually uses these platforms in less than 10% of them. At regional level, Poland transferred the required knowledge to carry out calculations of selected macroeconomic categories by territorial breakdown. - Joint programming and aid fragmentation: Poland will continue participation in the EU joint programming. Poland participates in joint programming in Ethiopia and is planning to participate in selected countries of Eastern Partnership depending on the development of the process. Poland s development cooperation is conducted on the basis of a multiannual development cooperation programme. The next programme, which covers the years 2016-2020, will take into account synchronisation with the partner country programming cycle and division of labour in countries where Poland will participate in joint programming. - Sector concentration and division of labour: Poland s development aid is now focusing on 20 priority countries and maximum 3 sectors in each country. Poland is going to reduce by half the number of priority countries as well as the number of sectors in the new Multiannual Development Cooperation Programme in 2016-2020. Regarding obstacles to improving in-country division of labour, the Polish experience shows that the main obstacle to better donor`s coordination remain the lack of coordination capacities on the side of the recipient governments. Moreover, the inability of donors to align sectors and synchronise project and programming cycles is also a huge obstacle. - Countries in fragile and conflict situation: In principle there are no special guidelines. In the case of South Sudan the decision was taken not to fund projects due to security concerns. The situation in other fragile countries is carefully studied to consider the security conditions. - Public-private engagement: The Development Cooperation Act Of 16th September 2011 provides for the participation of the social partners including the private sector. A Development Cooperation Programme Board serves as a consultative and advisory body and includes representative of employers organizations. The National Coordinator for International Development Cooperation conducts regular meetings with representatives from the private sector. 6. GLOBAL AGENDA AND GOVERNANCE - By joining DAC OECD Poland supports and will actively participate in the efforts to enhance the coherence and inclusiveness of the international monetary, financial and trading systems in support of development. Text and reported numbers: updated to 25/09/2015. Charts and tables reproduced from the 2015 Accountability Report published in July 2015. 9