Inter-Department Invoice Voucher may sometimes be necessary to:

Similar documents
FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICY 7A-5 COST TRANSFER POLICY. This policy applies only to cost transfers between or to sponsored projects.

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA Office for Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP) COST TRANSFER PROCEDURES

Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children s Hospital of Chicago Cost Transfer Policy Federal Awards (effective date: 9/1/17)

Office of Sponsored Projects Cost Transfer Policy for Federally Sponsored Projects. Purpose. I. Introduction. Definition. Applicability of this Policy

Salary/Wage Cost Transfers Involving Sponsored Projects Policy

POLICY. Number: Sponsored Research Cost Sharing Responsible Office: Research & Innovation

SUBJECT: Effective Date: Policy Number:

COST TRANSFERS. What Federal Audits Reveal

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY POLICY ON SPONSORED PROJECT COST TRANSFERS

Expenditure Transfers Between Funding Sources

Guidelines & Procedures for Monitoring Subrecipients

STANDARD ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

A8.900 ACCOUNTING FOR RESEARCH & TRAINING CONTRACTS & GRANTS. A8.930 Services with the Research Corporation of the University of Hawai i

FINAL DRAFT New Jersey Institute of Technology Number: University Policies and Procedures Date of Issue: October 12, 2011

Direct Charging of Administrative and Clerical Salaries to Federal Awards

Cost Accounting Standards at Stony Brook University

ALLOWABLE COSTS ON GRANTS February 2010

General Rules for the Use of Funds Deposited or Held in KUCR Accounts

ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER

University of Central Florida

DRAFT ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER

Colgate University Guidelines for Charging Expenses to Federally Funded Awards December 10, 2010

Policy on Cost Allocation, Cost Recovery, and Cost Sharing

Cost Transfers on Sponsored Projects

AUDIT AND UNC FIT STANDARDS FOR SPONSORED PROJECTS DEPARTMENTAL KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPI) Reportable Conditions and/or Disallowed Costs

Research & Sponsored Programs Accounting Policy Recharge Centers and Annual Approval of Rates POLICY STATEMENT

PURCHASING CARD GUIDE

Procedures for the Administration of Subcontracts

Iowa State University Sponsored Programs Costing Policy For Awards Subject to OMB Circular A-21 (2 CFR 220)

SUBJECT: Effective Date: Policy Number:

Effective Date: 01/25/2013. Supersedes: 08//2008. Responsible Authority: Division of Research Director, Research Accounting

Prepared by Office of Procurement and Real Property Management. This replaces Administrative Procedure No. A8.266 dated September 2014 A8.

WHAT THE PI NEEDS TO KNOW

Davis Technical College Restricted Fund Accounting Sponsored Project Contracts, Custom Fit, & Grants

New York University UNIVERSITY POLICIES

Post Award Financial Management. Fall 2015

Lunch & Learn Sponsored Projects

Mandatory Cost Share. Percent Effort/Committed Effort

University of Nebraska at Omaha Service Center Procedure Appendix to Service Center Policy

The Division of Research is available to answer questions and provide assistance regarding the requirements of the Budget Revisions Policy.

The Uniform Guidance: Changes and Strategies for Implementation

Program Income on Sponsored Projects Policy No. GSU: University Research Services and Administration

To be eligible for a P-Card the applicant must meet the following criteria:

New York University UNIVERSITY POLICIES

Proposal Budget Basics

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY POLICY ON SPONSORED PROJECT SUBAWARDS

Contracts & Grants ESTABLISHING THE CONTRACT OR GRANT SYSTEM ACCESS & USER GROUP SECURITY ONLINE FINANCIAL REPORTS

New Jersey Institute of Technology Number: University Policies and Procedures

Service Center Procedure Appendix to Service Center Policy

Cost Transfers. Red Flag or White Flag?

Procedures for Service Centers

The University Maryland Baltimore County

A MESSAGE FROM CAROLINE C. WHITACRE

ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE LETTER

MILWAUKEE SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING Administrative Policy Created October 2016 Cost Allocation Policy on Sponsored Agreements/Grants

SPS Forms: Troubleshooting & Tips for Success

Coordinator of Research Communication

Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual

Research Service Centers (RSC) and Core Facilities. July 31, 2014

Western Michigan University Federal Costing Principles Policy

Federal Property Management Standards

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY RECHARGE CENTERS Policy and Procedures Revised December 2016

Subrecipient Monitoring on Sponsored Projects Policy No. GSU: University Research Services and Administration

Account Management and Transaction Review

CHARGING PRACTICES FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED GRANTS AND CONTRACTS 2009 (Revised) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS

Charging of Direct Costs to Sponsored Projects: Policy

SHARED SERVICES Office of Financial Services

Uniform Guidance: Key Points of the UNC Implementation - Getting to the Real Impacts of 2 CFR Part 200

Policy No.: FA FIN 001 Page 1 of 5. University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Policy & Procedure Manual

Cost Policy on Sponsored Agreements

SERVICE CENTER PROCEDURES RATE SETTING AND ACCOUNTING GUIDELINES Updated and effective November 1, 2016

Expense &Travel Policy and Procedures

Purchasing Card Allocation Using Banner Admin:

Subrecipient Monitoring & Risk Assessment Guidelines

Reviewed by: Chuck Roper (Treasury) Sue Potter (A/P) Bill Santiago (Purchasing)

I. INTRODUCTION DEFINITIONS. Effective Date: 05/13/15. Office of Academic Grants and Sponsored Research ( ;

SPA & SPAC UPDATE MEETING SECOND QUARTER 2013

University of Rhode Island Office of the Controller. Management of Research Receivables Revised 8/2/2013

Accounting Overview Training

Policies Superseded: 604 Review/revision(s): March 2011; Sept. 2013

San Francisco State University US Bank Departmental Travel Card

Fiscal Guidelines For CSC Funded Programs FY 2016/2017

DIVISION OF RESEARCH RECHARGE FACILITIES OPERATING PROCEDURES. August SW 8th Street MARC 430 Miami, FL

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY Financial Procedure Instructions FPI 6-2

Campus Administrative Policy

BASIC BUDGETING ERA ELECTIVE

LAMAR STATE COLLEGE ORANGE

Unallowable Cost Policy Revision Date: 8/18/17

CALS Best Practices Cell Phone Payments

Advances (Including Petty Cash and Accounts Receivable)

Budget 101 Resources for Building a Proposal Budget

Financial Regulations applicable to College Senior Members and Staff

Henry S. Czauski, Acting Director, Departmental Enforcement Center, CV

Proposal Budgeting 101 Why budgets are more than just a bunch of numbers

Module 4. Budget Management Costs

Introduction to Indirect Costs

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

Standard Operating Procedure. Summer Salary and Supplemental Pay for 9-Month Faculty. February 15, 2017 (First Issued May 1, 2012)

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH OFFICE OF THE UTAH STATE AUDITOR

COLORADO STATE UNIVESITY Financial Procedure Instructions FPI 2-7

Transcription:

1.0 INTRODUCTION COST TRANSFERS FOR SPONSORED PROJECTS A cost transfer is any transfer of an expense involving a sponsored project via an Inter- Department Invoice Voucher. Institutions receiving federal funds are potentially subject to audit disallowances without sufficient control and documentation of cost transfers. For a cost transfer, just as for any other expenditure transaction, the federal government is looking for documentation to establish that the expenditure is appropriate to the account receiving the charge, i.e., that it is generally allowable, reasonably allocable, and directly applicable to the activity represented by the charged account. Not just the nature, but also the timing, of cost transfers is important. For example, federal auditors will often assume that a late transfer of cost into an underexpended account from an overexpended account has been made simply to cover the overexpenditure. Also, frequent errors in the recording of costs may indicate to federal auditors the need for improvements in the departmental/university's controls. What happens if a cost transfer does not meet government requirements? Effective July 1, 1990, the government required universities to retain external auditors to conduct extensive reviews of federal grant and contract expenditures to include reviews of cost transfers. In the event that a cost transfer does not meet the government requirements, the dollar amount of the transfer will be disallowed and the College or School responsible for the grant/contract will be responsible for the disallowed cost transfer. If a significant number of cost transfers do not meet government requirements, the auditors may extrapolate the disallowances and recommend disallowing a percentage of ALL cost transfers for a particular department, college/school, or University-wide. 1.1 ALLOWABLE TYPES OF TRANSFERS Inter-Department Invoice Voucher may sometimes be necessary to: 1. Correct bookkeeping or clerical errors in original charges within 90 days of the error and providing an appropriate explanation of the error (after 90 days, not reviewing the ledger sheet in a timely manner will not be an acceptable explanation); 2. Properly allocate costs to the appropriate accounts using a verifiable and reasonable method in accordance with cost accounting principles; 3. Transfer charges between accounts supporting closely related work for reasons other than covering overexpenditures (This requires sponsor written approval. Refer to "Closely Related Work" Section 1.5 in policy);

4. Reclassify overexpenditures to voluntary cost sharing accounts (In accordance with the University's Cost Sharing Policy). However, under no circumstances can costs that directly benefit nonfederal projects be assigned or transferred to federal projects, whether or not interrelated, if the federal project does not also benefit directly from the expenditure. Nor can charges be transferred to any account regardless of sponsor if the charging account has not directly benefited from the charge. Any costs allocable to a particular sponsored project under the standards provided in this policy may not be shifted to other sponsored projects in order to meet deficiencies caused by overruns or other fund considerations or for other reasons of convenience. See OMB Circular A-21 1.2 TIMING In all cases, the transfer must be made promptly. This is particularly critical when approaching the end of a budget period, otherwise sponsor reports may be filed including inappropriate charges. In this context, "promptly" means that the cost transfer should be made no later than 90 days of the original transaction, and in all cases 30 days prior to the date the final report is due to the sponsor. Research Financial Services must approve any cost transfer request greater than 90 days. Requests for cost transfers to be processed between 91 and 120 days must be signed specifically by the principal investigator and must also be signed and approved by the applicable department chair. If under some rare circumstances, it should be necessary to make a cost transfer beyond 120 days, then the applicable dean's signature will be required in addition to the signatures of the principal investigator and department chair. Requests for late cost transfers should include an explanation of the extenuating circumstances which prevented the transaction from being made earlier. The Principal Investigator signature certifies the expenditure(s) is appropriate for the sponsored project account and that the expenditure(s) complies with the terms and restrictions governing that sponsored project account. The Department Chair or Director signature certifies the expenditure and documentation has been reviewed to ensure compliance with both internal policies and the sponsored project terms and restrictions. The Dean or Vice Chancellor/President signature certifies the same procedure as the chair/director and understands in the event that a cost transfer is disallowed by an auditor, the College or School is responsible for the disallowed cost. (See Section 1.6 below.) Expenditures made pending receipt of a sponsored grant or contract should never be charged to another sponsored project account in the interim. Instead, a departmental

account should be used as the temporary clearing account (because that is where nonsponsored departmental research would be appropriately charged if the project is not ultimately funded). Multiple requests to transfer costs later than 90 days after the original occurrence without an approved explanation of extenuating circumstances will be denied and all charges will be moved to either the Dean s direct overrun account, the mandatory cost share account or the Dean s indirect overrun account as appropriate. Any cost transfer removing an expenditure(s) greater than 90 days old from a federal project must contain the above referenced documentation and signatures. The expenditures cannot be charged to another sponsored project account. 1.3 DOCUMENTATION The request for cost transfer must include: 1. Specific identification of the original charge (Copy of the originating documents such as a purchase orders, DAVs, or travel vouchers and all supporting vendor invoices, receipts, or other documentation as appropriate); 2. Justification of the appropriateness of the charge to the receiving account; and 3. A full explanation of why the transfer is necessary. The federal government expects the official documentation for a cost transfer to include a complete explanation of the reason the transfer is being made. The federal Public Health Service (PHS) Grants Policy Statement states that explanations such as "to correct error" or "to transfer to correct account" are not sufficient. See Chapter 7 of the PHS Grants Policy Statement. Requests for cost transfers into sponsored project accounts involving personnel costs require special attention. With personnel costs, if the transfer involves previously certified effort, or effort that is to be certified on the semi-annual and annual certification you must coordinate this with the certifying official (department chair) to assure proper certification of effort. When the personnel costs are not subject to above certifications (hourly employees), the documentation should include an explanation of why the change is being made, certify that the new allocations accurately reflect the effort that the individual expended during the period, and must be documented by labor distribution sheets or STEPS invoices showing the distribution of effort to each account that was originally charged. When transferring salaries and wages, consideration must be taken to also reclassify the associated personnel benefits cost. 1.4 DISALLOWANCES

The department with which the charge is affiliated, is responsible for appropriately funding any cost transfers which are disallowed due to failure to meet the timing or documentation requirements stated above. The department and/or Dean will be held financially responsible if any cost transfers are later disallowed on an audit. The following circumstances are considered unallowable: 1. An IDIV crediting the Dean s direct overrun account. 2. An IDIV changing an indirect object code (such as office supplies) to a direct object code when the back up documentation refers to an indirect item (such as paper or pencils and pens). If the indirect item is allowable on the sponsored project account, the department must contact the appropriate Research Administrator in Sponsored Projects Administration to budget the indirect object code to the account. 3. An IDIV using faculty-related object codes such as 1101, 1102 and/or 1120. Normally, this type of correction must be done through the Faculty Effort System. 4. An IDIV moving over-expenditures to another sponsored project account at the end of the project. 1.5 CLOSELY RELATED WORK When the work supported by one sponsored project is determined to represent work closely related to that of another sponsored project, a cost transfer from one of the accounts to the other might be legitimately made with prior written approval from the sponsor receiving the charge. At a minimum, the following conditions must be met to justify a cost transfer on the grounds that the activity qualifies as "closely related work": 1. The projects are scientifically and technically related. 2. The projects are under the direction of the same principal investigator. 3. There is no change in the scope of the sponsored projects involved. 4. The relating of costs will not be detrimental to the conduct of work under each award. 5. The relatedness will not be used to circumvent the terms and conditions of the awards. 1.6 OBJECT CODES

The term "transfer" is used in this context only because federal regulations use the expression "cost transfer." This does not mean that these entries are recorded on "transfer" object codes within the meaning of college and university accounting principles. Instead, these entries are normally recorded with the debit and credit on the same object codes as were used on the original transaction. 1.7 GENERAL GUIDELINES An IDIV cannot be processed on a frozen account. An IDIV cannot be processed on a closed account. An IDIV with charges more than 120 days old must have appropriate signatures and an explanation of extenuating circumstances which prevented the transaction from being made earlier. Charges under this circumstance that are not approved will be moved to the appropriate Dean s overrun account or mandatory cost sharing account. An IDIV that will overspend an account will not be processed. An IDIV that moves force posted pro card charges from a departmental account to a sponsored project account will not be processed without approval of the Manager or Assistant Manager of Sponsored Projects Accounting. If the amount being transferred differs from the amount indicated on the backup documentation, the written explanation must indicate what the difference is by percentage and appropriateness of the amount being charged. There should be no negative amounts on an IDIV. Multiple requests to transfer costs later than 90 days after the original occurrence without an approved explanation of extenuating circumstances will be denied and all charges will be moved to either the Dean s direct overrun account, the mandatory cost share account or the Dean s indirect overrun account as appropriate. 1.8 GOAL Any cost transfer should be so complete or detailed, that a person completely removed from the situation (For example, an Auditor) will be able to look at the request five years from now and know what and why this entry was made.