ICRA LANKA S RATINGS FOR GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANIES

Similar documents
ISSUER RATING A NOTE ON METHODOLOGY

Rating Methodology for Non-Banking Finance Companies

ICRA Lanka Rating Methodology for Banks

GENERAL INSURANCE RATING METHODOLOGY. Presented by: CREDIT RATING AGENCY OF

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

GUIDANCE NOTE ASSET MANAGEMENT BY AUTHORIZED INSURERS

REINSURANCE RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE

Rating Methodology. Insurance Company Ratings. Global Master Criteria for Rating Short Term Insurance and Reinsurance Companies.

Microfinance Institutions Ratings

Public Disclosure. To know more about our Company's history, our profile and business objectives, please click on the below link.

PILLAR III DISCLOSURES

CREDIT RATING INFORMATION & SERVICES LIMITED

Risk Concentrations Principles

Decision on amendments to the Decision on risk management. Article 1

Understanding Best s Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR) for U.S. Property/Casualty Insurers

Sampo Group Risk Management Principles. 9 May 2018

PILLAR III DISCLOSURES

1. Introduction Process for determining the solvency need The basis for capital management Risk identification...

For the attention of: Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transaction Division, OECD/CTPA. Questions / Paragraph (OECD Discussion Draft)

GUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

Guidance for (Re)Insurance Undertakings on the Head of Actuarial Function Role

Risk Appetite. What is risk appetite?

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process)

We referred to ICP 20 which deals with public disclosures and is therefore directly comparable to the SFCR.

MAINFIRST BANK AG. BASEL III Pillar 3 - Disclosures as at. 31 December 2014

TYRE REINSURANCE (IRELAND) DAC. Solvency and Financial Condition Report. For Financial Year Ending 31 st December 2016 (the reporting period )

EARLY WARNING SIGNALS IN INSURANCE COMPANIES

2. Process for determining the solvency need The basis for capital management Risk identification... 4

AAS BTA Baltic Insurance Company Risks and Risk Management

ICRA Lanka reaffirms the ratings of LOLC Finance PLC March 18, 2019

Public Finance. Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria. Revenue Supported. Master Criteria

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

Rating Methodology. Financial Institutions. Global Master Criteria for Rating Banks and Other Financial Institutions. Updated April 2013

1. Introduction Process for determining the solvency need The basis for capital management Risk identification...

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT - THIRD QUARTER 2010

Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test 2017 Results Disclosure. Webster Financial Corporation and Webster Bank, N.A.

Cincinnati Financial Reports Second-Quarter 2018 Results

A.M. Best s New Risk Management Standards

Methodology Review Seminar

Guidance on the Actuarial Function MARCH 2018

LEGAL & GENERAL GROUP PLC risk management supplement

REGULATION. on Internal Governance Arrangements, the Management body and the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process for Banks and Savings banks

CREDIT RATING INFORMATION & SERVICES LIMITED

Does ERM matter?* Enterprise risk management for the insurance industry

Understanding BCAR for U.S. Property/Casualty Insurers

1. Introduction Process for determining the solvency need Definitions of main risk types... 9

Risk and investment management

Asgard Employee Super Account - Ernst & Young

Statement of Guidance

update The APRA Capital Update: What does it mean for you?

Guidance on the Actuarial Function April 2016

FAMILY TAKAFUL. (Shariah compliant life insurance) Assessment of Business Risk Financial Risk. Presenter: Amara Gondal

US Life Insurer Stress Testing

Prudential Standard GOI 3 Risk Management and Internal Controls for Insurers

The Financial Services Authority. of The Republic of Indonesia A COPY OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY REGULATION NUMBER 17/POJK.

Moody's Rating Methodology for U.S. Health Insurers

RISK MANAGEMENT MODULE

Rynda Property Investors LLP (the Firm )

Homeowners' ROE Outlook. October 2018

Cincinnati Financial Reports First-Quarter 2013 Results Cincinnati, April 25, 2013 Cincinnati Financial Corporation (Nasdaq: CINF)

ANNUAL REPORT Statement of comprehensive income. Page 17 Notes to the financial statements

CEIOPS-DOC-06/06. November 2006

INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT 30 SEPTEMBER 2011

Rating Methodology Banks and Financial Institutions

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT MARCH 31, 2010

29th India Fellowship Seminar

Basel II Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process. Simon Topping Hong Kong Monetary Authority

The Society of Actuaries in Ireland. Actuarial Standard of Practice INS-1, Actuarial Function Report

U.S. REIT Credit Rating Methodology

CFO statement. Balance sheet strength maintained. Results demonstrate resilience of our franchise

GUIDANCE NOTE ON LICENSED INSURERS OWN SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT

Western Captive Insurance Company DAC. Solvency and Financial Condition Report. For Financial Year Ending 31 st December 2016 (the reporting period )

Guidance consultation FSA REVIEWS OF CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT BY CCPS. Financial Services Authority. July Dear Sirs

Claims Paying Ability - Insurance Companies

Framework for a New Standard Approach to Setting Capital Requirements. Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris

Pillar III Disclosures

INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS GUIDELINE. Nepal Rastra Bank Bank Supervision Department. August 2012 (updated July 2013)

NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL

ERM in the Rating Process: A Practical Perspective

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

Securitisation of trade receivables: an alternate source of corporate liquidity

1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

SOLVENCY ADVISORY COMMITTEE QUÉBEC CHARTERED LIFE INSURERS

RISK AND RETURN: UNDERWRITING, INVESTMENT AND LEVERAGE PROBABILITY OF SURPLUS DRAWDOWN AND PRICING FOR UNDERWRITING AND INVESTMENT RISK.

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY GUIDELINES ON STRESS TESTING FOR THE BERMUDA BANKING SECTOR

Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers. CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014

ICRA Lanka revises the outlook to Negative for Commercial Credit and Finance PLC

Guideline. Own Risk and Solvency Assessment. Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices. No: E-19 Date: November 2015

How to review an ORSA

Mapping of Life Insurance Risks 1/25/02

Lazard Insights. Distilling the Risks of Smart Beta. Summary. What Is Smart Beta? Paul Moghtader, CFA, Managing Director, Portfolio Manager/Analyst

Key Challenges Reflections from the FSA

Rating Criteria: Financial Institutions

DORINCO REINSURANCE COMPANY NAIC GROUP CODE 0000 NAIC COMPANY CODE 33499

PRIME INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

GUIDELINES ON REINSURANCE PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

BERMUDA INSURANCE (GROUP SUPERVISION) RULES 2011 BR 76 / 2011

Credit Administration and Documentation Standards

Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process

Transcription:

ICRA LANKA S RATINGS FOR GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANIES Insurance Financial Strength Rating (IFSR) is ICRA Lanka's opinion on the financial strength of the rated insurer and its ability to honour policy-holder claims and obligations on time. ICRA Lanka s IFSR is a comprehensive analytical process that examines the industry dynamics, the regulatory environment, and the business fundamentals of the general insurance company concerned, its competitive position within the industry, and its financial strength. ICRA Lanka s IFSRs are essentially forward looking and attempt to assess the company s ability to withstand stress and meet policyholder liabilities. ICRA Lanka expects its IFSRs to be an important input influencing the consumer's choice of insurance companies and products. ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK ICRA Lanka s IFSRs reflect its opinion on the long-term relative risk associated with the rated general insurers ability to honour their commitment to policy -holders on time. The rating methodology is a combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses and includes an interactive process with management to understand and assess its strategy and key aspects of its business, which qualitatively drive its operating position and financial policy. The industry analysis part looks at the structure of competition within the insurance company s operating environment and its competitive position within that structure. The analysis of the company s business fundamentals, on the other hand, focuses primarily on franchise value, management, organisational structure/ownership, and underwriting and reinsurance strategies. The analysis of the insurance company s financial risk involves an assessment of key indicators, including profitability, liquidity, operating and financial leverage, capital adequacy, and asset/liability management. A key element of ICRA s evaluation is the financial strength of the promoting entity and its ability to bring in capital to fund the general insurance company s growth and meet the regulatory solvency requirements and support the latter s financial profile. BUSINESS ANALYSIS Industry Analysis The competition structure within each segment of the insurance industry is a significant determinant of the operating strength of companies in those segments. As for the insurance industry as a whole, the key factors influencing its financial strength include: Degree of concentration within the industry and within sectors Impact of competition on pricing strategies of individual participants. Barriers to entry Regulatory Environment ICRA Lanka expects the domestic insurance industry, given its socio-economic importance, to remain under a fair amount of regulatory control in the coming years. Currently, the Sri Lankan insurance industry is governed by the Regulation of Insurance Industry Act, No 43 of 2000 and the subsequent amendments made by Regulation of Insurance Industry (Amendment) Act, No 27 of 2007 and Regulation of Insurance Industry (Amendment) Act, No 03 of 2011, and the rules and regulations that are gazette therefrom, which spell out the entry norms for new insurance ventures and also the norms for the valuation of assets and liabilities. ICRA Lanka evaluates the current regulatory environment, as well as the possible changes in regulations or taxation laws that could impact an insurer s competitive position or lead to a restructuring of the segments within the industry. Ownership, Management and Strategic Focus The financial strength of an insurance company s parent is an important source of financial flexibility for an insurer, particularly in the start-up phase. A review of the insurer s parentage and all the subsidiaries and

affiliates (if any) of the parent may be a simple or even a complex exercise. In either case, ICRA Lanka s IFSR exercise also involves assessing the importance of the insurance company within the parent s group structure, the group s free cash flows, and the availability of these cash flows for meeting policy-holder claims, particularly during periods of stress. An evaluation of the parent is also important given that it may leverage itself to down-stream funds as capital to the insurance subsidiary, thus enhancing the subsidiary s capital adequacy. ICRA Lanka s IFSRs have a strong linkage with the long-term debt rating of the parents concerned. In evaluating the management of an insurance company, ICRA Lanka considers its track record in such areas as investments, distribution, and product innovation. The management s strategy, as reflected by the overall growth or new business development rate, also plays an important role in shaping ICRA Lanka s opinion on the financial strength of an insurer. Typically, ICRA Lanka s analysis entails extensive interactions with an insurer s management, and throughout the rating process, ICRA Lanka attempts to form an opinion on the management s quality and growth aspirations. This assessment is critical and necessarily subjective and helps in assessing the ability of the management to respond to challenges. The areas of strategy reviewed during a IFSR exercise include the insurer s long-term vision, risk-return appetite, attitude towards financial and operating leverage, strategies for raising capital, and view of shareholder value creation. Discussions with the insurer s management also serve to highlight its views on products and markets on which the company intends to focus, its expectations of success therein, and its expectations on the growth and profitability trends in the company s principal lines of business. Operating Strengths and Business Franchise The assessment of an insurer s franchise value focuses on its competitive position within its marketplace, and other characteristics that can help it create enduring value. Specifically, ICRA Lanka assesses the quality of the insurer s products and distribution systems, its image and reputation. Moreover, ICRA Lanka examines whether the insurer has sustainable advantages in its key lines of business, and assesses its ability to utilise such advantages in new areas. The method and mechanism using which an insurance company delivers its products, particularly for commodity lines of businesses, is another fundamental aspect of the company s business profile. For some insurers, distribution strategy may be a source of competitive advantage, while for others, the same may provide flexibility in pricing and management of business volumes. Whatever the strategy, ICRA Lanka views an insurer s control over its distribution system, as an important indicator of its competitive advantage within its line of business. Underwriting The prices charged to customers are estimates of amounts necessary to cover costs, most of which will be incurred and paid in future. Consequently, an insurer s premium rate monitoring process, as well as its underwriting process, must be reviewed and evaluated. ICRA Lanka evaluates the different business segments within which the insurance company operates, first, by reviewing past underwriting results, and second, by reviewing current underwriting procedures that will determine future profitability levels. A key objective here is to analyse the risks inherent in the insurance company s business mix. Pricing sufficiency of the insurer would also be evaluated in terms of ability to design correct pricing on the basis of expected losses in the portfolio, which are a key determinant of underwriting and claim settlement risk. Reinsurance Strategy Reinsurance plays an important role in reducing exposure to catastrophic risks and in enhancing an insurer s operating leverage. ICRA Lanka evaluates an insurer s use of reinsurance to determine the degree to which the company relies on it for leverage. Quality of reinsurance is a key factor in this analysis. ICRA Lanka tries to assess the structure of the insurer s key reinsurance programmes in relation to the probable maximum loss estimates and past catastrophe experience. Assessing the quality of reinsurance recoverables is also an important part of ICRA Lanka s analysis of asset quality. This typically involves identifying both

reinsurers from which the company has the largest over dues and those to which it has significant exposures. A review of the credit-worthiness of these reinsurers is made by reference to their International Financial Strength Ratings and by considering prior payment experience. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Capitalisation Central to ICRA Lanka s assessment of insurance financial strength is its assessment of both the financial and operating leverage of the insurer. The purpose of this analysis is to form an opinion on the insurer s use of financial and operating leverage, and to determine how such practices affect its overall financial flexibility. ICRA Lanka assesses the operating leverage in terms of the business volume generated relative to the insurer s capital, and evaluates the financial leverage in terms of financial obligations relative to capital. The operating leverage would capture risks from adverse reserve development, pricing inadequacy and reinsurance credit exposure. A higher leverage may boost shareholder returns, but at the cost of policyholder security. An adequate capitalisation protects an insurer s ability to withstand catastrophes, adverse changes in underwriting results and volatility in investment returns and the quantum of capital required is usually a function of an insurer s business mix, business volumes and quality of asset portfolio. Profitability One of the most important factors in ICRA Lanka s IFSR process is the profitability of the insurer. This, in turn, is a function of a number of factors, including: (1) market focus of the insurer; (2) competitive dynamics in each market segment; (3) operating costs; (4) underwriting record and outlook; and (5) investment strategy. ICRA Lanka assesses each of these factors to reach a conclusion on the insurer s expected long-run profitability, and on the risk of the actual results deviating from expectations. Besides, ICRA Lanka makes an evaluation of the product-wise underwriting profitability, which provides a good indication of the returns generated by the insurer s principal lines of business. Historical profitability trends also provide the background for subsequent discussions with the insurer s management on the outlook for profitability in the principal business segments. An important objective of this profitability analysis is to develop a view on the quality and sustainability of earnings, since these issues are key to the insurer s longterm solvency. Liquidity ICRA Lanka s analysis of liquidity considers the sustainability of operating cash flows, the marketability and liquidity of the investment portfolio, and the availability of other sources of liquidity, such as lines of credit. Liquidity is evaluated in relation to potential demands on the insurer s available funds, including the payout pattern of loss reserves, and the extent to which the insurer is exposed to catastrophe risks. Investment Risk ICRA Lanka evaluates an insurer s asset quality by reviewing its investment portfolio. In this exercise, ICRA Lanka considers the credit and interest rate risks relative to the nature and mix of the insurer s liabilities. Specifically, the degree of diversification and the liquidity of the portfolio are looked at. High concentration in one type of security raises concerns over market or credit risk, and the sustainability of returns. Eventually, ICRA Lanka s evaluation of the investment portfolio entails a review of how the portfolio as a whole may be expected to perform in future, considering the credit risk, market risk and interest rate risk involved. ICRA Lanka s analysis of an insurer s investments also involves an understanding of the insurer s investment goals and the regulatory constraints, which together influence the construction of the portfolio. Asset/Liability Management Asset liability management assumes considerable significance where the assets and liabilities have widely different maturity profiles and liquidity characteristics. Insurance companies sell insurance contracts and invest the proceeds in primary securities (bonds, stocks, mortgages, etc.), with the allocation of the proceeds

across different investment options being guided by the norms laid down by IBSL. ICRA Lanka s analysis of the asset liability management practices of an insurer primarily involves understanding the exposure profile (anticipated claims payment patterns) and assessing the degree to which the investment cash flows can service policy-holder demands. SUMMING UP The rating process involves both quantitative and qualitative assessment of issues. We obtain and analyse company provided data as well as information available from public sources. The process is highly interactive involving significant discussion with management to get insights into its strategy and risk appetite. Consistent with our general approach to ratings, there exist no formulaic approach to arrive at the rating and the emphasis is on the qualitative assessment of issues over a mere quantitative approach.

ICRA Lanka s Long-Term Rating Scale [SL]AAA [SL]AA [SL]A [SL]BBB [SL]BB [SL]B [SL]C -The Highest claims paying ability assigned by ICRA Lanka. Indicates fundamentally strong position. Prospect of meeting policyholder obligations is the best. - High claims paying ability assigned by ICRA Lanka. Risk factors are modest and may vary slightly. Prospect of meeting policyholder obligations is high and differs from AAA only marginally. -Adequate claims paying ability assigned by ICRA Lanka. Prospect of meeting policyholder obligations is adequate. The risk factors are more variable and greater in periods of economic stress and any adverse changes in business /economic circumstances as may be visualized, may alter the fundamental strength. -Moderate claims paying ability assigned by ICRA Lanka. The protective factors are below average and adverse changes in business /economic circumstances are likely to affect the prospect of meeting policyholder obligations. - Inadequate claims paying ability assigned by ICRA Lanka. The protective factors fluctuate in case of changes in business /economic conditions and prospects of meeting policyholder obligations are more likely to be affected by such changes. -Weak claims paying ability assigned by ICRA Lanka. Risk factors indicate that policyholder obligations may not be met when due. Adverse changes in business /economic conditions could result in inability /unwillingness to service policyholder obligations. -Lowest claims paying ability assigned by ICRA Lanka. Indicates fundamentally poor position. Such companies may often be in default on policyholder obligations may be or are likely to be placed under supervision by insurance regulator. September 2018