Customers. State Regulated. FERC Regulated. Competitive PSERC ISO LSE

Similar documents
Volumetric Hedging in Electricity Procurement

1 < = α σ +σ < 0. Using the parameters and h = 1/365 this is N ( ) = If we use h = 1/252, the value would be N ( ) =

Hedging Quantity Risks with Standard Power Options in a Competitive Wholesale Electricity Market

Hedging Quantity Risks with Standard Power Options in a Competitive Wholesale Electricity Market

Physical and Financial Virtual Power Plants

Constellation Energy Comments on Proposed OTC Reforms

Managing Risk of a Power Generation Portfolio

Commodity and Energy Markets

In competitive wholesale electricity markets, regulated load-serving entities (LSEs) and marketers with default

Comments in FERC Docket No. RM The FGR vs. FTR debate: Facts and Misconceptions

VALLEY CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE. Staff Report Item 12. Mitch Sears, Interim General Manager Gary Lawson, Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)

Supplemental Material: Buyer-Optimal Learning and Monopoly Pricing

A Tutorial on the Flowgates versus Nodal Pricing Debate. Fernando L. Alvarado Shmuel S. Oren PSERC IAB Meeting Tutorial November 30, 2000

Information and uncertainty in a queueing system

Modeling spark spread option and power plant evaluation

Lecture 2. Main Topics: (Part II) Chapter 2 (2-7), Chapter 3. Bayes Theorem: Let A, B be two events, then. The probabilities P ( B), probability of B.

Evaluation of Alternative Market Structures and Compensation Schemes for Incenting Transmission Reliability and Adequacy Related Investments

Corporate Finance: Credit rationing. Yossi Spiegel Recanati School of Business

Course notes for EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Locational Marginal Pricing

Non-Exclusive Competition and the Debt Structure of Small Firms

Generation Adequacy through Call Option Obligations: Safe Passage to the Promised Land

Effects of Size and Allocation Method on Stock Portfolio Performance: A Simulation Study

Capital Budgeting: The Valuation of Unusual, Irregular, or Extraordinary Cash Flows

NYISO s Compliance Filing to Order 745: Demand Response. Wholesale Energy Markets

Risk and Return. Calculating Return - Single period. Calculating Return - Multi periods. Uncertainty of Investment.

California ISO October 1, 2002 Market Design Elements

California ISO Report. Regional Marginal Losses Surplus Allocation Impact Study

Memorandum. This memorandum requires Board action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Buyer-Optimal Learning and Monopoly Pricing

Historical Pricing PJM COMED, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF THREE-ASSET PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT

Linz Kickoff workshop. September 8-12,

( ) ( ) β. max. subject to. ( ) β. x S

Non-Inferiority Tests for the Ratio of Two Correlated Proportions

Does Hedging Reduce the Cost of Delegation?

PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION FOR OPEN ACCESS CONSUMERS/DISCOMS

CLAS. CATASTROPHE LOSS ANALYSIS SERVICE for Corporate Risk Management. Identify the Hazard. Quantify Your Exposure. Manage Your Risk.

Historical Pricing PJM PSEG, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

Wholesale Panel. A Tale of Three (Very Different) Markets

U. Carlos III de Madrid CEMFI. Meeting of the BIS Network on Banking and Asset Management Basel, 9 September 2014

ICForecast: Strategic Power Outlook. Q Sample

Wholesale markets for electricity : The point of view of a trader

Ex post payoffs of a tolling agreement for natural-gas-fired generation in Texas

Standard Market Design

Analysis on Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) Game Theory of Petroleum Group Corporation

Dr. Maddah ENMG 625 Financial Eng g II 10/16/06. Chapter 11 Models of Asset Dynamics (1)

ELECTRICITY FUTURES MARKETS IN AUSTRALIA. Sami Aoude, Lurion DeMello & Stefan Trück Faculty of Business and Economics Macquarie University Sydney

Chapter 7 DESIGN FLAWS AND A WORSENING CRISIS. Sequential Markets and Strategic Bidding

PPL Corporation 3 rd Quarter Earnings. November 4, 2014

VISTRA ENERGY CORP. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

C (1,1) (1,2) (2,1) (2,2)

Optimal Bidding Strategies in Electricity Markets*

WEEKLY MARKET UPDATE

Buying Energy in Today s Market - Maximizing Effective Risk Management. Glenn Barrett SUPERVALU, Director of Energy Management

NYMEX - Annual Strips

Boğaziçi University Department of Economics Spring 2017 EC 206 MICROECONOMICS II Problem Set 9 - Solutions

Welfare implications of capacity markets in the electricity sector

Games with more than 1 round

This report summarizes key market conditions, developments, and trends for September 2001.

The Inherent Inefficiency of Simultaneously Feasible Financial Transmission Rights Auctions

Management Accounting of Production Overheads by Groups of Equipment

EIM Market Monitoring and Market Power Mitigation

JOSEPH A. HOLTMAN - ELECTRIC. 1 Q. Please state your name, title, employer and business. 4 Electricity Supply for Consolidated Edison Company of

Managing Environmental Financial Risk Gregory W. Characklis Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering University of North Carolina at Chapel

This report summarizes key market conditions, developments, and trends for November 2001.

Maximize the Sharpe Ratio and Minimize a VaR 1

Bank of America Merrill Lynch Power & Gas Leaders Conference. September 16, 2014 Boston, MA

Diversification: more than one project. It may be beneficial for a firm, in terms of getting hold of external funds, to have several projects.

The Nordic Market Model 10 Years of Experience

CVAR-Constrained Multi-Period Power Portfolio Optimization. Cigdem Z. Gurgur Emily K. Newes Coliseum Blvd. East Westminster CO 80021, USA

Wholesale power market challenges:

A Multi-Objective Approach to Portfolio Optimization

The basics of energy trading. Edgar Wilton

California ISO. Allocating CRR Revenue Inadequacy by Constraint to CRR Holders. October 6, Prepared by: Department of Market Monitoring

Financial Risk Management

Resource Planning with Uncertainty for NorthWestern Energy

Tom Chamberlin. Tom Chamberlin. Brian DeBruin Forced Outage Risk Solutions, Managing Director Aon Global Power. Marina Nadirova Product Executive

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

EXPOSURE PROBLEM IN MULTI-UNIT AUCTIONS

Hedging Risk. Quantitative Energy Economics. Anthony Papavasiliou 1 / 47

ASSESSMENT OF TRANSMISSION CONGESTION IMPACTS ON ELECTRICITY MARKETS

Midwest Investor Roadshow June 23-25, 2009

Price Gap and Welfare

Public Service Enterprise Group

Market Monitoring, Mitigation & Analysis

DRAFT. More on Options Vs. Obligations and FGRs vs. Pt. To Pt. FTRs. Shmuel S. Oren. University of California at Berkeley.

Cross-border auctions in Europe: Auction prices versus price differences

UK ELECTRIC MARKET REFORM APPLICATION TO TEXAS POWER MARKET. Ingmar Sterzing CEIC Seminar April 10, 2013

Sanford C. Bernstein Strategic Decisions Conference. May 29, 2014

Hedging Complex Barrier. Options Broadway, 6th oor 545 Technology Square. New York, NY Cambridge, MA Current Version: April 1, 1997

Market Power Screens and Mitigation

Memorandum. This memorandum does not require Board action. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Supply chain disruption assessment based on the newsvendor model

Value-at-Risk Based Portfolio Management in Electric Power Sector

LSE Perspective on FTR and ARR Surplus Funds. Jeff Whitehead Direct Energy

Individual Comparative Advantage and Human Capital Investment under Uncertainty

Price Formation and Reserve Markets

Flexible Capacity Requirements for 2019 through 2021

CRR Prices and Pay Outs: Are CRR Auctions Valuing CRRs as Hedges or as Risky Financial instruments?

Interest Rates in Trade Credit Markets

Transcription:

PSERC Shmuel Oren oren@ieor.berkeley.edu IEOR Det., University of California at Berkeley and Power Systems Engineering Research Center (PSerc) (Based on joint work with Yumi Oum and Shijie Deng) Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets University of New South Wales October 9, 8 Oren - October 9, 8 1 Cometitive FERC Regulated State Regulated Customers Demand Management Generation Transmission Distribution Micro-Grids Retail Providers Power Generation SC LSE ISO PX TO SC - Scheduling Coordinator PX - Power Exchange ISO - Inde. System Oerator TO - Transmission Owner LSE - Load Serving Entity Oren - October 9, 8 1

CAISO (1998) Poulation: 3 Million Peak Load: 45,5MW Annual Total Energy: 36,45GWh Generation Caacity: 5,MW Average Net Imorts: 6,5MW (Peak 8,3MW) Wholesale Average rice: $56.7/MWh Annual Wholesale Market: $14 Billion PJM (1999) Poulation: 51 million Peak load: 144,644 MW Annual Total Energy: 79,GWh Generating caacity: 164,95 MW Transmission lines - 56,5 miles Members/customers - 45+ Annual Wholesale Market: $4 Billion ERCOT (1) (not under FERC) Poulation: 18 Million (85% of Texas) Peak Load: 63,MW Annual Total Energy: 3,GWh Generation Caacity: 8,MW Average Net Imorts: Non Wholesale Average rice: ~$7/MWh Annual Wholesale Market: $ Billion Oren - October 9, 8 3 $1 $9 Marginal Cost ($/MWh) Marginal Cost $8 $7 $6 Resource stack includes: Hydro units; Nuclear lants; Coal units; Natural gas units; Misc. $5 $4 $3 $ $1 $ 4 6 8 1 Demand (MW) Oren - October 9, 8 4

$4 ERCOT Energy Price On eak Balancing Market vs. Seller s Choice January thru July 7 $35 $3 UBES /5/3 $53.45 Balancing Energy (UBES) Price Sot Price Energy- ERCOT SC Energy Price ($/MWh) $5 $ $15 $1 $5 Jan- Mar- May- Jul- Se- Nov- Jan-3 Mar-3 May-3 Jul-3 Se-3 Nov-3 Jan-4 Mar-4 May-4 Jul-4 Se-4 Nov-4 Jan-5 Mar-5 May-5 Jul-5 Se-5 Nov-5 Jan-6 Mar-6 May-6 Jul-6 Se-6 Nov-6 Jan-7 Mar-7 May-7 Jul-7 $ Shmuel Oren, - UC October Berkeley 9, 6-19-8 5 Oren - October 9, 8 6 3

Oren - October 9, 8 7 Generators Customers (end users served at fixed regulated rate) Wholesale electricity market (sot market) LSE (load serving entity Similar exosure is faced by a trader with a fixed rice load following obligation (such contracts were auctioned off in New Jersey and Montana to cover default service needs) Oren - October 9, 8 8 4

Real Time Price ($/MWh) 1 1 Period: 4/1998 1/1 8 6 4 1 3 4 5 6 Actual load (MW) Oren - October 9, 8 9 Electricity Demand and Price in California 18 18 Load 16 Price 14 14 1 1 1 1 8 8 6 6 4 4 Electricity Price ($/MWh) Demand (MW) 16 9, July ~ 16, July 1998 Correlation coefficients:.539 for hourly rice and load from 4/1998 to 3/ at Cal PX.7,.58,.53 for normalized average weekday rice and load in Sain, Britain, and Scandinavia, resectively Oren - October 9, 8 1 5

Proerties of electricity demand (load) Uncertain and unredictable Weather-driven volatile Sources of exosure Highly volatile wholesale sot rice Flat (regulated or contracted) retail rates & limited demand resonse Electricity is non-storable (no inventory) Electricity demand has to be served (no busy signal ) Adversely correlated wholesale rice and load Covering exected load with forward contracts will result in a contract deficit when rices are high and contract excess when rices are low resulting in a net revenue exosure due to load fluctuations Oren - October 9, 8 11 Electricity derivatives Forward or futures Plain-Vanilla otions (uts and calls) Swing otions (otions with flexible exercise rate) Temerature-based weather derivatives Heating Degree Days (HDD), Cooling Degree Days (CDD) Power-weather Cross Commodity derivatives Payouts when two conditions are met (e.g. both high temerature & high sot rice) Demand resonse Programs Interrutible Service Contracts Real Time Pricing Oren - October 9, 8 1 6

One-eriod model At time : construct a ortfolio with ayoff x() At time 1: hedged rofit Y(,q,x()) = (r-)q+x() Sot market r LSE Load (q) x() Portfolio for a delivery at time 1 Objective Find a zero cost ortfolio with exotic ayoff which maximizes exected utility of hedged rofit under no credit restrictions. Oren - October 9, 8 13 Objective function max E U x( ) [ [( r ) q + x( )] ] max x( ) Utility function over rofit U[( r ) q + x( )] f (, q) dqd Joint distribution of and q Constraint: zero-cost constraint 1 Q E [ x( )] = B! A contract is riced as an exected discounted ayoff under risk-neutral measure risk-neutral robability measure rice of a bond aying $1 at time 1 Oren - October 9, 8 14 7

The Lagrange multilier is determined so that the constraint is satisfied [ ' ( r ) q + x*( ) ) ] E U Mean-variance utility function: g( ) = * f ( ) 1 E[ U ( Y )] = E[ Y ] avar( Y ) g( ) g( ) 1 f ( ) f ( ) Q x* ( ) = 1 + E [ E[ y(, q) ]] E[ y(, q) ] a g( ) Q Q g( ) E E f ( ) f ( ) Oren - October 9, 8 15 Bivariate lognormal distribution: (log,log q) ~ N(4,.7, 5.69,., ) under P & Q E[ ] = $7 / MWh, ( ) = $56 / MWh E[ q] = 3MWh, ( q) = 6MWh r = $1 / MWh (flat retail rate) ) ( * x 8 x 1 4 6 4 Otimal exotic ayoff = =.3 =.5 =.7 =.8 E[] Mean-Var y 7 t i 6 l i b 5 a b 4 o r 3 P -5 x 1 8 1 = =.3 =.5 =.7 =.8 Dist n of rofit -5 5 rofit: y = (r-)q + x() x 1 4 Note: For the mean-variance utility, the otimal ayoff is linear in when correlation is, - 5 1 15 5 Sot rice Oren - October 9, 8 16 8

Comarison of rofit distribution for mean-variance utility (=.8) Price hedge: otimal forward hedge Price and quantity hedge: otimal exotic hedge Bivariate lognormal for (,q) -4 x 1 3 y t i l i b a b o r P.5 1.5 1.5 After rice & quantity hedge After rice hedge Before hedge -1 -.5.5 1 1.61.5.5 3 Profit x 1 4 Oren - October 9, 8 17 Q m = E [log ] ) ( * x With Mean-variance utility (a =.1) 7 x 1 4 6 5 4 3 1-1 E Q 63.1, if m m1 =.1 66.4, if m m1 =.5 [ ] = 69.8, if m m1 = 73.3, if m m1 =.5 77.1, if m m1 =.1 m = m1-.1 m = m1-.5 m = m1 m = m1+.5 m = m1+.1-5 1 15 5 Sot rice Oren - October 9, 8 18 9

(Bigger a = more risk-averse) 1 E[ U ( Y )] = E[ Y ] avar( Y ) with mean-variance utility (m = m1+.1) x 1 4 ) ( * x 15 1 5 a =5e-6 a =1e-5 a =5e-5 a =.1 a =.1-5 5 1 15 5 Sot rice Note: if m1 = m (i.e., P=Q), a doesn t matter for the mean-variance utility. Oren - October 9, 8 19 F + x( ) = x( F) 1+ x'( F)( F) + x''( K)( K ) dk + x''( K)( K) Bond ayoff Payoff Forward ayoff Strike < F Put otion ayoff Payoff F Strike > F Payoff + Call otion ayoff dk F Forward rice Exact relication can be obtained from a long cash osition of size x(f) a long forward osition of size x (F) long ositions of size x (K) in uts struck at K, for a continuum of K which is less than F (i.e., out-of-money uts) long ositions of size x (K) in calls struck at K, for a continuum of K which is larger than F (i.e., out-of-money calls) K Strike rice K Strike rice Oren - October 9, 8 1

) ( * x 8 x 1 4 6 4 = =.3 =.5 =.7 =.8 x ( ) x ( ) x( ) ) ( ' * x 5 = =.3 =.5 =.7 =.8 ) ( ' ' * x 6 5 4 3 uts calls = =.3 =.5 =.7 =.8-5 1 15 5 Sot rice -5 5 1 15 5 Sot rice 7 x 1 4 1 F 5 1 15 5 Sot rice Payoffs from discretized ortfolio f f o y a 6 5 4 3 1-1 x*() Relicated when K = $1 Relicated when K = $5 Relicated when K = $1-5 1 15 5 Sot rice Oren - October 9, 8 1 Objective function Utility function over rofit Q: risk-neutral robability measure zero-cost constraint (A contract is riced as an exected discounted ayoff under risk-neutral measure) (Same as Nasakkala and Keo) Oren - October 9, 8 11

Price and quantity dynamics Oren - October 9, 8 3 Oren - October 9, 8 4 1

Otimal Oren - October 9, 8 5 Oren - October 9, 8 6 13

*In reality hedging ortfolio will be determined at hedging time based on realized quantities and rices at that time. Oren - October 9, 8 7 max x() E[Y(x)] Q s.t. E [x()] = VaR (Y(x)) V where VaR (X) = í ã ã such that P{X í} = 1 ã Let s call the Otimal Solution: x*() Q: a ricing measure Y(x()) = (r-)q+x() includes multilicative term of two risk factors x() is unknown nonlinear function of a risk factor A closed form of VaR(Y(x)) cannot be obtained Oren - October 9, 8 8 Oum and Oren, July 1, 8 8 14

For a risk aversion arameter k x k 1 () = arg max E[Y(x)]- kv(y(x)) x() Q s.t. E [ x( )] = We will show how the solution to the mean-variance roblem can be used to aroximate the solution to the VaR-constrained roblem Oren - October 9, 8 9 Oum and Oren, July 1, 8 9 Suose.. There exists a continuous function h such that VaR ã (Y(x)) = h(mean(y(x)), std(y(x)),ã) with h increasing in standard deviation (std(y(x))) and nonincreasing in mean (mean(y(x))) Then x*() is on the efficient frontier of (Mean-VaR) lane and (Mean- Variance) lane Oren - October 9, 8 3 Oum and Oren, July 1, 8 3 15

The roerty holds for distributions such as normal, student-t, and Weibull For examle, for normally distributed X VaR ( x) = z std( x) E( x) The roerty is always met by Chebyshev s uer bound on the VaR: P{ x E( x) k} var( x)/ k x Px { Ex ( ) tstdx ( )} 1/ t VaR ( x) t std( x) E( x) 1 1 t Oren - October 9, 8 31 Oum and Oren, July 1, 8 31 Oren - October 9, 8 3 Oum and Oren, July 1, 8 3 16

We assume a bivariate normal dist n for log and q Under P log ~ N(4,.7 ) q~n(3,6 ) corr(log, q) =.8 Under Q: log ~ N(4.1,.7 ) Distribution of Unhedged Profit (1-)q Oren - October 9, 8 33 Oum and Oren, July 1, 8 33 x k () =(1- A B )/k-(r-)(m + E log D) + C B Oren - October 9, 8 34 Oum and Oren, July 1, 8 34 17

Once we have otimal x k (), we can calculate associated VaR by simulating and q and Find smallest k such that VaR(k) V (Smallest k => Largest Mean) Oren - October 9, 8 35 Oum and Oren, July 1, 8 35 Oren - October 9, 8 36 Oum and Oren, July 1, 8 36 18

Oren - October 9, 8 37 Oum and Oren, July 1, 8 37 Risk management is an essential element of cometitive electricity markets. The study and develoment of financial instruments can facilitate structuring and ricing of contracts. Better tools for ricing financial instruments and develoment of hedging strategy will increase the liquidity and efficiency of risk markets and enable relication of contracts through standardized and easily tradable instruments Financial instruments can facilitate market design objectives such as mitigating risk exosure created by functional unbundling, containing market ower, romoting demand resonse and ensuring generation adequacy. Oren - October 9, 8 38 19