FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/ :15 AM INDEX NO /2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 984 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2017

Similar documents
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, Richard T. Andrias David Friedman Sheila Abdus-Salaam Nelson S. Román, JJ.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/ :15 AM INDEX NO /2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 980 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2017 EXHIBIT A

J.P. Morgan Sec. Inc. v Vigilant Ins. Co NY Slip Op 33799(U) September 13, 2010 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Charles

J.P. Morgan Sec. Inc. v Vigilant Ins. Co NY Slip Op 31295(U) July 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs designate New York County as the place of trial. Plaintiffs,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/25/2012 INDEX NO /2008 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/25/2012

Five Questions to Ask to Maximize D&O Insurance Coverage of FCPA Claims

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. AT&T CORP., Plaintiff Below, No. 236, 2006 Appellant,

Case 3:09-cv N-BQ Document 201 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3204

Case KJC Doc 510 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : Chapter 11

JP MORGAN CHASE CO v. INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017

ELLENS/MIDDLETON V. GENWORTH LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY

Insurance Coverage for Governmental Investigations of Financial Institutions

Q UPDATE EXECUTIVE RISK SOLUTIONS CASES OF INTEREST D&O FILINGS, SETTLEMENTS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/27/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 318 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/27/2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO RGS ) ) ) ) )

1. Why did I get this letter? 2. What is this lawsuit about? 3. Why is this a class action? 4. Why is there a Settlement?

Your Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement

Exhibit 1

Case 1:15-cv LG-RHW Document 62 Filed 10/02/15 Page 1 of 11

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/2011 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2011

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2012 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 166 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2012

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT in WAWA ESOP LITIGATION Pfeifer v. Wawa, Inc. et al, Case No (E.D. Pa.)

Case 2:09-cv JES-SPC Document 292 Filed 06/13/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID 5442

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/25/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/25/2015

T he US Supreme Court s recent decision in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative

HAVE TO SUBMIT A CLAIM TO RECEIVE A PAYMENT FROM THIS SETTLEMENT

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. DAVID MILLS, Appellant V. ADVOCARE INTERNATIONAL, LP, Appellee

14902 Law Offices of Zachary R. Index /14 Greenhill P.C., et al., Plaintiff-Appellants,

DIRECTORS & OFFICERS AND FIDUCIARY LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR ESOPS: The Exposure, the Solutions, the Marketplace

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/21/ :52 PM INDEX NO /2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 436 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/21/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/13/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/13/2018

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO AH

Sirius XM Radio Inc. v XL Specialty Ins. Co NY Slip Op 32872(U) November 7, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: O.

Forest Labs., Inc. v A rch Ins. Co.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No.: SC DCA Case No.: 5D v. L.T. Case No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE APRIL 4, 2002 Session

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION II.

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

Procedural Considerations For Insurance Coverage Declaratory Judgment Actions

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/12/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2017 EXHIBIT A

Case LSS Doc 79 Filed 03/15/19 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

When Trouble Knocks, Will Directors and Officers Policies Answer?

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

MAR CFPB Wins Final Judgment Against Morgan Drexen for Illegal Debt-Relief Scheme

D-1-GN NO.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2012

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY

Legal Notice. Your Legal Rights Are Affected Even If You Do Not Act. Read This Notice Carefully. You May: Summary: Due Date:

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

THIS NOTICE IS DIRECTED TO:

Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of Florida

UPDATE ON INSURANCE CODE ON DECEPTIVE, UNFAIR, AND PROHIBITED PRACTICES

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE : : : : : : : : Defendant.

RIGHT TO INDEPENDENT COUNSEL: OVERVIEW AND UPDATE

Case: 5:12-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/15/12 1 of 10. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO COMPLAINT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION RYBAKOV v. BISSELL BROS., INC.

J.P. Morgan Sec. Inc. v Vigilant Ins. Co NY Slip Op 30769(U) April 17, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge:

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT. If you were an unpaid intern in Atlas Media Corp. ( Atlas ), you could receive a payment from a class action settlement

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

PLI February 22, 2016 Presentation on Manipulative Spoofing and Layering Trading Activity

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Stern Tannenbaum & Bell LLP, New York (Aegis J. Frumento of counsel), for respondent.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS CERTIFICATION AND PARTIAL PROPOSED BIOVAIL SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

Legal Proceedings First Quarter Fiscal 2009

WT HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. ARGONAUT GROUP, INC., Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER Civil File No (MJD/JSM)

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

COURT OF APPEALS PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO J U D G E S

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

INDEPENDENT COUNSEL AFTER DAVALOS

Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 1 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. ) Civil Action No.

Case 3:10-cv Document 36 Filed in TXSD on 05/24/12 Page 1 of 2

Key D&O Policy Enhancements To Consider for ACI D&O Liability December 1, 2009 Peter M. Gillon, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO

The only way to get a payment. NO LATER THAN MARCH 10, 2011 EXCLUDE YOURSELF NO LATER THAN MARCH 10, 2011 SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/25/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2014 EXHIBIT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 9, 2015

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Standard Mortgage Clause Preserves Coverage for Mortgagee Notwithstanding Carrier s Denial of Named Insured s Claim

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY (NEWARK) : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 3:13-cv M Document 1 Filed 05/23/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1

LEGAL ALERT. March 17, Sutherland SEC/FINRA Litigation Study Shows It Sometimes Pays to Take on Regulators

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Transcription:

FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2017 1115 AM INDEX NO. 600979/2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 984 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/12/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK COMMERCIAL DIVISION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC., J.P. MORGAN CLEARING CORP., and THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES LLC, Plaintiffs, - against - VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD S, LONDON, and AMERICAN ALTERNATIVE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendants. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x Index No. 600979/09 PRE-ARGUMENT STATEMENT Defendants-Appellants Vigilant Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company, Federal Insurance Company, National Union Fire Insurance Company Pittsburgh, Pa., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd s, London, and American Alternative Insurance Corporation (collectively, the Insurers ), as and for their pre-argument statement pursuant to NYCRR 600.17, state as follows 1. Title of the Action As captioned above. 2. Full Names of the Original Parties and Any Change in the Parties As captioned above. 1 of 9

FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2017 1115 AM INDEX NO. 600979/2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 984 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/12/2017 3. Names, Addresses and Telephone Numbers of Counsel for Appellants For Appellants Vigilant Insurance Company and Federal Insurance Company DLA PIPER LLP (US) Joseph G. Finnerty III Megan Shea Harwick Eric S. Connuck 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10020-1104 (212) 335-4500 For Appellant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. D AMATO & LYNCH, LLP Luke D. Lynch, Jr. Kevin J. Windels Liza A. Chafiian 2 World Financial Center New York, New York 10281 (212) 269-0927 For Appellant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company KAUFMAN BORGEEST & RYAN LLP Scott A. Schechter Andrew E. Oldis Matthew Mawby 120 Broadway, 14th Floor New York, New York 10271 (212) 980-9600 For Appellant Travelers Indemnity Company DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP Marsha J. Indych 1177 Avenue of the Americas, 41st Floor New York, New York 10036 (212) 248-3140 David F. Abernethy Erin M. Turner One Logan Square, Ste. 2000 Philadelphia, PA 19103-6996 (215) 988-2700 2 2 of 9

FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2017 1115 AM INDEX NO. 600979/2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 984 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/12/2017 For Appellant Certain Underwriters at Lloyd s, London CLYDE & CO. US LLP Edward J. Kirk Deborah Elsasser 405 Lexington Avenue, 16th Floor New York, New York 10174 (212) 710-3900 For Appellant American Alternative Insurance Corporation BATESCAREY LLP Kristi S. Nolley R. Patrick Bedell 191 North Wacker Drive Suite 2400 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 762-3100 Of Counsel LANDMAN CORSI BALLAINE & FORD P.C. Michael L. Gioia 120 Broadway, 27th Floor New York, New York 10271 (212) 238-4800 4. Name, Address and Telephone Number of Counsel for Plaintiffs-Respondents For Plaintiffs J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp., and the Bear Stearns Companies LLC (collectively, Bear Stearns ) PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Steven E. Obus Seth B. Schafler Francis D. Landrey Matthew J. Morris Eleven Times Square New York, New York 10036 (212) 969-3000 5. Court and County from Which the Appeal Is Taken Supreme Court of the State of New York, Commercial Division, County of New York. 3 3 of 9

FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2017 1115 AM INDEX NO. 600979/2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 984 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/12/2017 6. Nature and Object of the Cause of Action In 2006, after three years of investigation into Bear Stearns mutual fund trading conduct, the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) entered a final order in an administrative enforcement proceeding finding that Bear Stearns intentionally orchestrated a late trading and market timing trading scheme that stole hundreds of millions of dollars of mutual fund share value from innocent shareholders (the SEC Order ). At the same time, the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE ) issued a Hearing Panel Decision of guilty as set forth by unanimous vote (emphasis added) against Bear Stearns, finding that Bear Stearns had engaged in exactly the same illegal trading scheme (the NYSE Decision ). The SEC Order and NYSE Decision both contain 40 pages of factual findings that Bear Stearns had directed and operated an illegal late trading and market timing scheme, had knowingly processed its customers illegal late trades as if they had been submitted hours earlier, had falsified internal order tickets to misrepresent that it had received late trading orders before the 400 P.M. deadline, and had cancel[led] unprofitable trades the next day. The SEC and NYSE also found that Bear Stearns executed market timing mutual fund trades despite thousands of demands that Bear Stearns received from the mutual funds to stop allowing market timing in their funds. Bear Stearns assured the funds that it would take measures to prevent market timing trades, but instead of doing so, Bear Stearns actively worked with its clients to evade the blocks and restrictions [on market timing] imposed by the mutual funds by [h]iding the identity of its customers and traders who were known market timers, and assigning account numbers and registered representative numbers to disguise their deceptive market timing. The SEC Order and the NYSE Decision required Bear Stearns to disgorge $160 million of the illicit gains generated by the scheme, and to pay an additional $90 million as a penalty. The SEC and the NYSE both also concluded that Bear Stearns had willfully violated and 4 4 of 9

FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2017 1115 AM INDEX NO. 600979/2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 984 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/12/2017 willfully aided and abetted and caused violations of a litany of federal securities laws. The SEC censured Bear Stearns for its willful violations, ordered it to cease and desist from future violations, and mandated that Bear Stearns restructure its business to prevent future illegal trading. After settling with the SEC and NYSE, Bear Stearns agreed to pay an additional $14 million to settle thirteen shareholder class action lawsuits in which the plaintiffs had alleged that Bear Stearns had facilitated the same illegal mutual fund trading that was at issue in the regulatory findings. In 2009, Bear Stearns commenced this litigation alleging that the Insurers breached their obligations to Bear Stearns under their respective insurance policies and seeking insurance coverage for $140 million of its $160 million disgorgement payment, the $14 million it paid to settle the civil actions, and approximately $46 million in legal fees and costs that it claims to have incurred in defense of the regulatory investigations and civil claims. The Insurers answered and denied any breach of their respective contracts of insurance based on several defenses. In July 2016, the parties moved for summary judgment (Motion Sequence Nos. 18-22). 7. Results Reached in the Court Below The court below granted Plaintiffs motions for summary judgment, denied Insurers motions for summary judgment, and entered judgment in favor of Plaintiffs against Defendants Vigilant Insurance Company, Travelers Indemnity Company, Federal Insurance Company, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. 5 5 of 9

FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2017 1115 AM INDEX NO. 600979/2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 984 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/12/2017 Prior to the entry of judgment by the court below, Insurers filed a motion for leave to renew the prior motions for summary judgment based on the June 5, 2017 decision by the United States Supreme Court in Kokesh v. SEC, 137 S. Ct. 1635 (2017), which conclusively defines the nature of the SEC disgorgement remedy paid by Bear Stearns as an uninsurable penalty as a matter of law and requires a change in the decision by the court below on those prior motions. Insurers motion to renew remains pending. 8. Grounds for Reversal Without limiting the arguments that may be presented on appeal, each and all of which are expressly reserved, Insurers seek an order reversing the judgment, decisions and orders of the court below and granting Insurers motion for summary judgment as a matter of law because, among other things, (1) the definition of Loss in the insurance policies and New York public policy bar coverage for Bear Stearns SEC disgorgement payment, (2) the Profit or Advantage Exclusion bars coverage for Bear Stearns claims, (3) public policy bars coverage for Bear Stearns intentionally harmful conduct, (4) Exclusion 13 bars coverage for Bear Stearns liability for its customers ill-gotten gains, and (5) Bear Stearns has not met its burden to prove that its settlements with its regulators and the civil plaintiffs were reasonable. Alternatively, Insurers seek an order (1) striking the portion of the judgment, decision and order entering pre-judgment interest against defendants Travelers Indemnity Company, Federal Insurance Company, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company because the insurance coverage underlying the excess policies issued by those defendants has not been exhausted, and (2) striking the portion of the judgment, decision and order entering pre-judgment interest on the ground that the application of 6 6 of 9

FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2017 1115 AM INDEX NO. 600979/2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 984 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/12/2017 New York s prejudgment interest statute violates the Due Process and Takings Clauses of the United States and New York State Constitutions. Insurers reserve the right to raise such other issues as may be presented upon a review of the Record on Appeal. 9. Other Actions, Proceedings and Appeals No related action or proceeding is pending in any court. 7 7 of 9

FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2017 1115 AM INDEX NO. 600979/2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 984 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/12/2017 Dated New York, New York September 12, 2017 DLA PIPER LLP (US) DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP By /s/ Joseph G. Finnerty III Joseph G. Finnerty III Megan Shea Harwick Eric S. Connuck 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10020-1104 (212) 335-4500 By /s/ Marsha J. Indych Marsha J. Indych 1177 Avenue of the Americas, 41st Floor New York, New York 10036-2714 (212) 248-3140 David F. Abernethy Erin M. Turner One Logan Square, Ste. 2000 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-6996 (215) 988-2700 Attorneys for Vigilant Insurance Company and Federal Insurance Company Attorneys for Travelers Indemnity Company KAUFMAN BORGEEST & RYAN LLP CLYDE & CO. US LLP By /s/ Scott A. Schechter Scott A. Schechter Andrew E. Oldis Matthew Mawby 120 Broadway, 14th Floor New York, New York 10271 (212) 980-9600 By /s/ Edward J. Kirk Edward J. Kirk Deborah Elsasser The Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Avenue, 16th Floor New York, New York 10174 (212) 710-3900 Attorneys for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Attorneys for Certain Underwriters at Lloyd s, London 8 8 of 9

FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2017 1115 AM INDEX NO. 600979/2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 984 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/12/2017 D AMATO & LYNCH LLP BATESCAREY LLP By /s/ Luke D. Lynch, Jr. Luke D. Lynch, Jr. Kevin J. Windels Liza A. Chafiian Two World Financial Center New York, New York 10281 (212) 269-0927 By /s/ Kristi S. Nolley Kristi S. Nolley R. Patrick Bedell 191 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 2400 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 762-3100 Attorneys for National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg, Pa. Attorneys for American Alternative Insurance Corporation To Steven E. Obus Seth B. Schafler Francis D. Landrey Matthew J. Morris Proskauer Rose LLP Eleven Times Square New York, New York 10036 (212) 969-3000 Attorneys for J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp., and The Bear Stearns Companies LLC 9 9 of 9