Tax Reform for Pass-Through Entities: Impact of New Tax Law on Partnerships, LLCs and S-Corporations

Similar documents
Presenting a 90-minute encore presentation featuring live Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Private Investment Funds and Tax Reform

New Section 199A: Structuring Real Estate Transactions to Take Advantage of the Qualified Business Income Deduction

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Attendees seeking CPE credit must listen to the audio over the telephone.

Partnerships and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) Overview of new Sections 163(j), 199A, 1061 and selected other provisions of the TCJA

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Structuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs Navigating Capital and Profits Interests Plus Section 409A and Tax Consequences

Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Estate: Impact of Tax Reform

Private Equity Real Estate Fund Formation: Capital Raising, Regulatory Issues and Negotiating Trends

Scott J. Bakal, Partner, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, Chicago Robert C. Stevenson, Attorney, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, Washington, D.C.

Tax Treatment of Carried Interest: Planning Opportunities for Tax, Private Equity and Real Estate Professionals

Sandra Hernandez, Managing Director, WTAS, Los Angeles Jeanne Sullivan, Director, National Pass-Throughs Group, KPMG, Washington, D.C.

Presenting a 90 minute encore presentation featuring live Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Tax Strategies for Real Estate LLC and LP Agreements: Capital Commitments, Tax Allocations and Distributions, and More

IRC 751 "Hot Asset" Treatment: New Rules for Calculating Ordinary Income Recharacterization

Allocating Operating Expenses in Commercial Real Estate Leases: Negotiating Strategies for Landlords and Tenants

Tax Allocation in Pass-Through Entities

Estate Planning and Tax Reform: Wealth Transfer Structures Under the New Tax Law

Real Estate Transactions With REITs: Selling, Leasing or Lending to a REIT

Structuring Leveraged Loans After Tax Reform: Concerns for Multinational Entities

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Brian E. Hammell, Esq., Sullivan & Worcester, Boston

Mastering Tax Complexities in the Sale of Partnership and LLC Interests

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Structuring in the Face of the Pass Through Deduction, Interest Limitations and Immediate Depreciation

Structuring Waterfall Provisions in LLC and Partnership Agreements Navigating Complex Distribution Structures, Minimizing Negative Tax Consequences

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Tax Planning and Reporting for Partnership Equity Compensation Grants

Tax Challenges With Private Equity Management Fee Waivers Given Newly Heightened IRS Scrutiny

Structuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs Navigating Capital and Profits Interests Plus Section 409A and Tax Consequences

Mastering Reporting of Publicly Traded Partnership and MLP K-1s on Partners' Returns

Commercial Lease Negotiations: Property and Liability Insurance, Proof of Coverage, AI and Loss Payee Issues

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Disruption and Uncertainty in Partnership Tax

New Section 199A Qualified Business Income Regulations: Definitions, Thresholds, Exclusions and Calculations

Asset Sale vs. Stock Sale: Tax Considerations, Advanced Drafting and Structuring Techniques for Tax Counsel

Partnership Exchanges: Structuring "Drop and Swap" and "Mixing Bowl" Transactions Minimizing the Risk of an Unfavorable Audit Outcome

Completion Guaranties in Construction Lending: Key Provisions for Lenders and Guarantors

Executive Compensation: Tax and Other Considerations for Restricted Stock Awards

Private Equity Waterfall and Carried Interest Provisions: Economic and Tax Implications for Investors and Sponsors

Industry Outlook: Tax Reform s Impact on the Real Estate Industry

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Lending to Series of LLCs: Navigating UCC and Bankruptcy Code Risks and Providing Closing Opinions

Section 1202 Qualified Small Business Stock: Maximizing Tax Advantages of Gain Exclusion and Deferral

ERISA Considerations in Structuring Credit Facilities with Private Investment Funds

IRC Section 338(h)(10) Election

U.S.-Israeli Estate Tax Planning for Dual Citizens

20% TAX DEDUCTION MEDICAL PRACTICE

QDRO Drafting Boot Camp: Preparing QDROs for 401(k)s and Similar Defined Contribution Plans

Using Partnership Flips to Finance Renewable Energy Projects: Evaluating Tax Risks, Navigating IRS Safe Harbors

Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Tax Strategies for Real Estate LLC and LP Agreements: Capital Commitments, Tax Allocations, Distributions, and More

Changes to S Corporation, Partnership and LLC Taxation under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Advanced Tax Issues in Entity Selection Choosing the Entity to Meet the Client's Business Strategies and Capital and Compensation Structures

US Tax Reform: Impact on Private Funds

ERISA Retirement Plan Investment Management Agreements: Guidance for Plan Sponsors to Minimize Risks

What s News in Tax. Proposed Regulations under Section 199A. Analysis that matters from Washington National Tax

Exercising Setoff and Recoupment Rights in Bankruptcy

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Dean C. Berry, Partner, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft, New York

ERISA Compliance and Monitoring 401(k) Investments: Safe Harbor Rules and Appointing Advisers

TAX REFORM Speakers: Brian Dethrow and Ron Kerridge

Leveraging Earnings-Stripping Regs for Foreign Investments: Maximizing Tax Savings, Minimizing IRS Scrutiny

Survivor Benefit Plans and Military Divorce: Defending Against or Claiming Former-Spouse SBP Coverage

Presenting a 90-minute encore presentation featuring live Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Implications of the 2017 Tax Act: Choice of Entity

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Clearing Title for Defects Due to Mortgage-Related Issues, Legal Description Errors, and Foreclosure

Creatively Completing The Capital Stack: Real Estate GP Private Equity Funds

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Elizabeth A. Gartland, Esq., Fenwick & West, San Francisco

The Qualified Business Income Deduction Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Revenue Ruling : New IRC 355 North-South Spinoff Transaction Guidance and Resumption of Private Letter Rulings

Structuring Credit Facilities for Private Equity Funds: Subscription, NAV and Hybrid Loans

TAX REFORM: IMPACT ON BUSINESSES AND INDIVIDUALS. February 8, 2018 Bruce I. Booken Rose K. Wilson

Self Employment Taxes, NIIT and Pass-Through Entities

Updated 199A and Qualified Business Income (QBI) Insight for the Construction Industry September 20, 2018

Springing the Delaware Tax Trap: Drafting Limited Powers of Appointment to Increase Asset Income Tax Basis

Structuring Tax-Free M&A Deals: Navigating IRC 368 and 351, Selecting the Appropriate Structure

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: James O. Lang, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig, Tampa, Fla.

Using Partnership Flips to Finance Renewable Energy Projects: Evaluating Tax Risks, Navigating IRS Safe Harbors

Tax Executives Institute Houston Chapter. Partnership Update. February 27, 2018

Structuring Waterfall Provisions in LLC and Partnership Agreements Navigating Complex Distribution Structures, Minimizing Negative Tax Consequences

ERISA Pre-Approved and Customized Benefit Plans: Overhauled IRS Procedures and Determination Letter Process

Interest Rate Hedges in Real Estate Finance: Placing Swaps, Caps, and Collars on Floating Rate Loans

Copyright 2018, James M. McCarten, Burr & Forman LLP, all rights reserved

Fraudulent Conveyance Exposure for Intercorporate Guaranties, Integrated Transactions and Designated-Use Loans

Universal Health Services v. Escobar: Avoiding Implied Certification Liability Under FCA

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Minority Investors in LLCs: Contractual Limitations, Waivers of Fiduciary Duties, Other Key Provisions

New Accounting Method Rules for Small Business Taxpayers Under IRC 448

THE 20% TAX DEDUCTION FOR PASS-THROUGH ENTITIES EXPLAINED By. Keith C. Durkin (LL.M. Tax)

Tax Planning for Real Estate Under the TCJA

New Tax Law: Issues for Partnerships, S corporations, and Their Owners

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

How Does Tax Reform Affect Real Estate Developers & Investors?

Estate Planning With Grantor Trusts: Leveraging GRATs and IDGTs to Minimize Taxes, Preserve and Transfer Assets

Property Management and Leasing Agreements: Key Provisions for Multi-Family, Office, Retail and Industrial Properties

Transcription:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Tax Reform for Pass-Through Entities: Impact of New Tax Law on Partnerships, LLCs and S-Corporations Planning Techniques, Loopholes, Qualified Business Income Deductions and Limitations WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2018 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: Lynn E. Fowler, Partner, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, Atlanta Joseph C. Mandarino, Partner, Smith Gambrell & Russell, Atlanta The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 1. NOTE: If you are seeking CPE credit, you must listen via your computer phone listening is no longer permitted.

Tips for Optimal Quality FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-328-9525 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. NOTE: If you are seeking CPE credit, you must listen via your computer phone listening is no longer permitted. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY In order for us to process your continuing education credit, you must confirm your participation in this webinar by completing and submitting the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar. A link to the Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation will be in the thank you email that you will receive immediately following the program. For CPE credits, attendees must participate until the end of the Q&A session and respond to five prompts during the program plus a single verification code. In addition, you must confirm your participation by completing and submitting an Attendance Affirmation/Evaluation after the webinar. For additional information about continuing education, call us at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 2.

Tax Reform for Pass- Through Entities Joseph Mandarino jmandarino@sgrlaw.com February 21, 2018 Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP Promenade II, Suite 3100 1230 Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 www.sgrlaw.com

Disclaimer IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, this outline, the presentation to which it relates and any other documents or attachments are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. 5

Change in Carried Interest Rules Change in Partnership Termination Rule Application of New Interest Deduction Limitation to Partnerships and S Corporations 20% Deduction for Pass-Through Income Overview QTB/service limitation wages/property limitation 6

Carried Interest Reform Generally, a profits interest in a partnership can be granted to a recipient in exchange for or in connection with services on a tax-free basis. See, e.g., Rev. Proc. 2001-43. A so-called carried interest is a profits interest that a partnership grants to the manager or general partner at the outset. Assuming any conditions on the carried interest are met, the recipient is entitled to an interest in the profits of the partnership. Sometimes these profits are subject to clawback limitations. To the extent the profits of the partnership consist of longterm capital gains, the recipient is entitled to a share of such gains. 7

Carried Interest Reform Holding Period The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) changes these rules by adding a holding period. Under new Code section 1061, the recipient of a profits interest will only be entitled to LTCG treatment if he or she holds the interest for three (3) years rather than one year. Note that the three-year holding period applies whether or not a Section 83(b) election is made. Instead, the holding period begins on the date of grant. (Note that this does not impact the long-running debate as to whether a recipient of a profits interest should make a Section 83(b) election.) 8

Carried Interest Reform -- Exclusions Technically, any capital gains allocated to the recipient that do not meet the three-year holding period are treated as short-term capital gains. To the extent provided in regulations, the new rule does not apply to income or gain attributable to any asset not held for portfolio investment on behalf of third party investors. This language is not ideal, but appears to carve out relief for partnerships engaged in a trade or business and/or partnerships consisting of related parties (such as a family member or a colleague (defined as a person who performed a service in the same trade or business in which the taxpayer performed a service)). 9

Carried Interest Reform -- Details The new holding period only applies to an applicable partnership interest ( API ). An API is any interest in a partnership that, directly or indirectly, is transferred to (or held by) the taxpayer in connection with the performance of services in any applicable trade or business. The services may be performed by the taxpayer or a related person. The legislative history makes clear that this test is met even if the taxpayer makes contributions to the partnership. 10

Carried Interest Reform -- Details An applicable partnership interest does not include an interest held by a person: who is employed by another entity that is conducting a trade or business which trade or business is not an applicable trade or business) and who provides services only to the other entity. A partnership profits interest granted to a corporation is not an API. 11

Carried Interest Reform -- Details Recall that for an API, a taxpayer (or a related party) must perform services in an applicable trade or business ( ATB ). An ATB means any activity (regardless of whether the activity is conducted in one or more entities) that consists in whole or in part of: (1) raising or returning capital, (2) investing in (or disposing of) specified assets (or identifying specified assets for investing or disposition), or (3) developing specified assets. Services performed as an employee of an applicable trade or business are treated as performed in an applicable trade or business for purposes of this rule. 12

Carried Interest Reform -- Details Specified assets means securities (generally as defined under rules for mark-tomarket accounting for securities dealers), commodities (as defined under rules for mark-to-market accounting for commodities dealers), real estate held for rental or investment, cash or cash equivalents, options or derivative contracts with respect to such securities, commodities, real estate, cash or cash equivalents, or an interest in a partnership to the extent of the partnership s proportionate interest in the foregoing. 13

Carried Interest Reform Transfer Rule If a taxpayer transfers an API, directly or indirectly, to a person related to the taxpayer, then the taxpayer includes in gross income as short-term capital gain so much of the taxpayer s net long-term capital gain attributable to the sale or exchange of an asset held for not more than three years as is allocable to the API. The amount included as short-term capital gain on the transfer is reduced by the amount treated as short-term capital gain on the transfer for the taxable year under the general rule of new Section 1061. A related person for this purpose is a family member or colleague. 14

Partnership Termination Rules Under old Code Section 708, a partnership was treated as terminated in two situations: no part of any business, financial operation, or venture of the partnership continues to be carried on by any of its partners in a partnership, or within a 12-month period there is a sale or exchange of 50 percent or more of the total interest in partnership capital and profits The latter situation is the so-called technical termination. 15

Partnership Termination Rules Under a technical termination, there is a deemed contribution of all the partnership s assets and liabilities to a new partnership in exchange for an interest in the new partnership, followed by a deemed distribution of interests in the new partnership to the purchasing partners and the other remaining partners. The three main consequences of this are: the partnership s taxable year closes, potentially resulting in short taxable years, partnership-level elections generally cease to apply following a technical termination, and a technical termination generally results in the restart of partnership depreciation recovery periods. 16

Partnership Termination Rules Because of these vexsome consequences, it was common to structure transactions around this rule (e.g., transfer 49% today and the balance in 12 months and a day). The TCJA repeals the so-called technical terminations rule. The change is effective for partnership tax years beginning after 2017. 17

18

Interest Expense Reform TCJA changes the rules for interest expense deductions. Under prior law, a business could deduct interest expense, subject generally to accounting rules like OID and certain other limitations. Starting with 2018, an additional limitation is added: interest is deductible only to the extent of 30% of the taxpayer s EBITDA. Starting in 2022, the limitation drops to 30% of EBIT. 19

Interest Expense Reform No grandfathering of existing debt or transition period relief. However, taxpayers with annual gross receipts less than $25mm are exempt, and certain real estate, farming, regulated utilities, and certain other businesses are exempt. Floor financing plans are exempted. For corporations, the 30% limit applies on a consolidated basis. For pass-throughs, the application of the 30% limit is complex (see below). 20

Interest Expense Reform The effect of this change is to defer, not re-characterize interest. Any disallowed interest expense carries forward indefinitely for use in future years. Also, the limitation is on net interest expense. Lending businesses that both receive and pay significant amounts of interest may not be affected. The limitation applies to business interest, not investment interest. A pure investment partnership may not be affected by this limitation (although there are other limitations on investment interest). 21

Interest Expense Reform Example 1 The deduction limitation on interest expense from a partnership is determined at the partnership level. Example 1: XYZ corp is a 50% partner in Newco, a partnership. Newco has $200 of non-interest income and $40 of interest expense. Under the new limitation, Newco can deduct up to $60 of interest expense. Because Newco has only $40 of interest expense, the $20 difference is treated as excess taxable income ( ETI ) and handled separately (see below). Newco nets the $200 income against the $40 expense, for net income of $160. $80 is allocated to XYZ. 22

Interest Expense Reform Example 1 Assume XYZ has zero net income from the rest of its operations and $25 of interest expense. If it calculated its interest expense with the benefit of XYZ s $80 net allocation from Newco, it would be double counting. Conversely, if XYZ is unable to get some benefit from the fact that Newco has income in excess of what it needed to absorb its own partnership-level interest expense, it would hurt XYZ. To resolve this, XYZ is not permitted to include any income from Newco s partnership operations in XYZ s own calculations, except that XYZ is permitted to deduct an amount of its own interest equal to its share of Newco s ETI. 23

Interest Expense Reform Example 1 Recall that Newco had $20 of ETI, which is allocated among partners in the same ratio as each partner s share of nonseparately stated taxable income or loss. Thus, XYZ is allocated $10 of Newco s ETI and can deduct $10 of its $25 of intertest expense. 24

Interest Expense Reform Example 2 Example 2: Same facts, but Newco has $100 of noninterest income and $40 of interest expense. Thus, the partnership can only deduct $30 of interest expense and the remaining $10 is treated as excess business interest ( EBI ) and specially treated. Thus, Newco has $70 of net income. In this scenario there is no ETI for the partnership, but the EBI is allocated to each partner in the same proportion as nonseparately stated taxable income or loss. In the case of XYZ, Newco allocates $35 of net income to XYZ (50% x $70) and separately reports $5 of EBI to XYZ (50% of $10). 25

Interest Expense Reform Example 2 In the next year, XYZ can deduct the $5 of EBI only to the extent of ETI allocated to it by Newco. It cannot be offset against other income or against ETI from a different partnership. EBI is not carried forward by the Newco into a future year. Furthermore, XYZ s basis in Newco is reduced (but not below zero) by any EBI at the time it is allocated. However, if and when Newco allocates ETI to XYZ in a subsequent year and the EBI is deducted for tax purposes, there is no additional basis reduction. If XYZ sell s its partnership interest in Newco before any EBI is deducted, any remaining basis reductions attributable to EBI are eliminated (restored). 26

Interest Expense Reform Example 2 The EBI mechanism does not apply to S corporations. Thus, if an S corporation cannot deduct all its interest expense, the disallowed portion carries forward within the S corporation. The corresponding EBI basis mechanics also do not apply to S corporations. 27

20% Pass-Through Deduction The TCJA creates a new deduction that effectively lowers the tax rates on income allocated by an entity taxed as a partnership, an S corporation or a sole proprietorship. Individuals, trusts and estates can reduce the taxable income allocated through a pass-through by 20% in certain circumstances. (Does not apply to C corporations that are partners.) Assuming an individual was subject to the new top rate of 37%, this will lower the effective tax rate on pass-through income to about 30%. The deduction ends after 2025. There are many limitations on this benefit. 28

20% Pass-Through Deduction Conceptually, it may be easiest to under the pass-through deduction as having three major limitations: The QTB/service limitation The wage/property limitation The netting limitation We will discuss each of these in turn, but note that the first two limitations do not apply to taxpayers under certain income thresholds. 29

QTB/Service Limitation The pass-through deduction generally only applies to qualified business income ( QBI ). QBI is income from a US trade or business, but generally excludes passive investment income and compensatory income. By definition, QBI means the net amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss with respect to a qualified trade or business ( QTB ). 30

QTB/Service Limitation A QTB means any trade or business other than a specified service trade or business and other than the trade or business of being an employee. The definition of specified service trade or business has two parts: a state list of occupations and a general definition. The general definition is any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees or owners. Note that this is an extremely broad definition that could capture many situations that were not intended. 31

QTB/Service Limitation The fixed list includes any trade or business involving the performance of services in the fields of: health, law, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, investing and investment management, and trading, or dealing in securities, partnership interests, or commodities. 32

QTB/Service Limitation Note that late in the legislative process, the fields of engineering and architecture were dropped from this list. As discussed below, if a taxpayer comes below certain income thresholds, the specified service limitation does not apply. 33

Wages/Property Limitation Generally, the deduction is the lesser of: 20% of the taxpayer s QBI The alternative base amount. The alternative base amount is the greater of: 50% of the W-2 wages with respect to a business, or The sum of 25% of the W-2 wages and 2.5% of the tax basis of the qualified property of the business These limitations are meant to restrict the deduction to real businesses rather than investment partnerships or structured arrangements. 34

Wages/Property Limitation The amount of W-2 wages for this limitation is subject to several caveats. First, the term W-2 wages means, with respect to any partnership for any taxable year of such partnership, the amounts properly reported and paid by the partnership on an employee s W-2 statement as wages (section 6051(a)(3) and (8)). Second, the wages at issue must be properly allocable to the QBI at issue and cannot be unrelated wage expense. Third, the term only include wages properly included in a return properly and timely filed with the Social Security Administration. 35

Wages/Property Limitation In the case of a partnership, the pass-through deduction is determined at the partner level. Accordingly, the amount of W-2 wages allocated to the partner must be determined. Each partner is treated as having W-2 wages equal to such person s allocable share of the partnership s W 2 wages. For these purposes, a partner s allocable share of W-2 wages is determined in the same manner as the partner s allocable share of wage expense. 36

Wages/Property Limitation The definition of qualified property for purposes of the wages/property limitation means: tangible property of a character subject to the allowance for depreciation under section 167, which is held by, and available for use in, the QTB at the close of the taxable year, which is used at any point during the taxable year in the production of QBI, and for which the depreciation period has not ended before the close of the taxable year. 37

Wages/Property Limitation The term depreciable period means, with respect to qualified property of a taxpayer, the period beginning on the date the property was first placed in service by the taxpayer and ending on the later of: the date that is 10 years after such date, or the last day of the last full year in the applicable recovery period that would apply to the property under section 168 (determined without regard to section 168(g)). Thus, even if you elect to expense an asset, you get the benefit of the acquisition date tax basis. 38

Wages/Property Limitation As with the wage component, the amount of the unadjusted basis of a partnership s qualified property allocated to the partner must be determined. Each partner is treated as having an allocable share of the partnership s unadjusted basis of qualified property. For these purposes, a partner s allocable share of the unadjusted basis of qualified property shall be determined in the same manner as the partner s or shareholder s allocable share of depreciation expense. 39

Thanks! Joseph Mandarino Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP Promenade II, Suite 3100 1230 Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 www.sgrlaw.com 40

41

Section 199A Income Threshold Exception W-2/Property limitation does not apply if taxable income does not exceed threshold amount $157,500 for single individuals $315,000 for married filing jointly Services limitation does not apply if taxable income does not exceed threshold amount Thus, full 20% deduction available for taxpayers whose taxable income does not exceed threshold amount 42

Section 199A Income Threshold Exception Phase in of W-2/Property Limitation Phase-In for Taxable Income of Individuals $157,500-$207,500 for single individuals $315,000-$415,000 for married filing jointly If taxable income is in phase-in window, the W-2/Property Limitation partially applies 43

Section 199A Income Threshold Exception Phase in of W-2/Property Limitation Methodology 1. Determine 20% of QBI 2. Determine W-2/Property Limitation 3. Subtract (2) from (1), which is the excess amount 4. Portion of excess amount not deductible is equal to the percentage that taxable income exceeds threshold amount divided by $100,000 ($50,000 in case of single individual) 5. QBI Deduction = W-2/Property Limitation + Excess Amount not Disallowed 44

Section 199A Income Threshold Exception Example: Assume that a married couple who files jointly has taxable income of $375,000. The qualified business income is $300,000, and the W-2/Property Limitation is $40,000. 1. Determine 20% of QBI $60,000 2. Determine W-2/Property Limitation $40,000 3. Subtract (2) from (1), which is the excess amount $20,000 4. Portion of excess amount not deductible is equal to the percentage that taxable income exceeds threshold amount ($375,000-$315,000)/$100,000 = 60% of excess amount not deductible 5. QBI Deduction = $40,000 + $8,000 45

Section 199A Income Threshold Exception Phase in of Services Limitation Phase-In for Taxable Income of Individuals $157,500-$207,500 for single individuals $315,000-$415,000 for married filing jointly If taxable income is in phase-in window, the Services Limitation partially applies 46

Section 199A Income Threshold Exception Phase in of Services Limitation Methodology 1. Determine 20% of QBI 2. Portion of QBI from specified services business not deductible is equal to the percentage that taxable income exceeds threshold amount divided by $100,000 ($50,000 in case of single individual) 3. QBI Deduction = 20% of QBI minus amount disallowed under phase in 47

Section 199A Income Threshold Exception Example: Assume that a married couple who files jointly has taxable income of $375,000. The qualified business income from a specified services business is $300,000. 1. Determine 20% of QBI $60,000 2. Portion of QBI from specified services business not deductible is equal to the percentage that taxable income exceeds threshold amount divided by $100,000 ($50,000 in case of single individual) ($375,000- $315,000)/$100,000 = 60% not deductible 3. QBI Deduction = $24,000 48

Section 199A Qualified Business Income/Netting Qualified Business Income reduced by losses from qualified trade or business Example: Taxpayer has qualified business income of $75,000 from qualified business A and a qualified business loss of $50,000 from qualified business B in Year 1. Taxpayer s total QBI for Year 1 is $25,000, and the general deduction is $5,000 49

Section 199A Qualified Business Income/Netting If losses exceed QBI from other activities, excess loss carried over and reduces QBI from future years Example: Taxpayer has qualified business income of $30,000 from qualified business A and a qualified business loss of $50,000 from qualified business B in Year 1. Taxpayer is not permitted a deduction for Year 1 and has a carryover qualified business loss of $20,000 to Year 2. In Year 2, Taxpayer has qualified business income of $30,000 from qualified business A and qualified business income of $70,000 from qualified business B. Taxpayer reduces the 20% deductible amount determined for the qualified business income of $100,000 from qualified businesses A and B by 20% of the $20,000 carryover qualified business loss. 50

Section 199A - Qualified Business Income/Miscellaneous Rules Exclusions from QBI Certain items excluded from QBI even if effectively connected with a qualified trade or business Capital gains and losses Dividends and dividend equivalents Interest income other than interest income that is properly allocable to a trade or business Commodity transactions & foreign currency gains/losses Income and deductions from notional principal contracts 51

Section 199A - Qualified Business Income/Miscellaneous Rules Exclusions from QBI Publicly Traded Partnership ( PTP ) income generally excluded from QBI, but 20% of PTP income included in combined QBI eligible for 20% deduction PTP Income the sum of the net amount of the taxpayer's allocable share of each qualified item of income gain deduction and loss from a PTP that isn't treated as a corporation for tax purposes; and any gain recognized by the taxpayer upon the disposition of his or her interest in the PTP that isn't treated as a corporation for tax purposes and that isn t treated as capital gain under the hot asset rules 52

Section 199A - Qualified Business Income/Miscellaneous Rules Exclusions from QBI Qualfied REIT dividends generally excluded from QBI, but 20% of qualified REIT dividends included in combined QBI eligible for 20% deduction Qualified REIT Dividend is any dividend from a REIT received during the tax year that isn't a capital gain dividend and isn't qualified dividend income 53

Section 199A - Qualified Business Income/Miscellaneous Rules Exclusions from QBI Certain payments for services not included in QBI Reasonable amounts paid as compensation to taxpayer by qualified trade or business Characterization of a portion of business income as reasonable compensation? Guaranteed payments to partners for services rendered Section 707(a) recharacterized allocations of partnership profits as amounts paid for services 54

Section 199A - Planning Strategies & Observations Choice of entity considerations Guaranteed payments vs. distributive share of partnership income S Corporation reasonable compensation issues 55

Thank You Lynn E. Fowler lfowler@kilpatricktownsend.com 56