San Francisco s Formula Retail Economic Analysis

Similar documents
Western SoMa Land Use Matrix (Proposed by the WSoMa Task Force on 7/15/2010)

AN ORDINANCE. SECTION 1. Title 14 of The Philadelphia Code is hereby amended to read as follows: TITLE 14. ZONING AND PLANNING * * *

ORDINANCE NO

(REVISED) NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING

ECONOMIC ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES PAPER

Charlotte County SOUTHWEST FLORIDA Economic Development Office

FRIENDSWOOD PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM FORM

Harnett County Unified Development Ordinance Use Table (Adopted October 17, 2011) Amended March 21, 2016

CITY OF PASADENA FISCAL YEAR 2017 REVISED SCHEDULE OF TAXES, FEES, AND CHARGES

REVISED ADOPTED REVISED FY2017 FY2018 FY2018 MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION RATE RATE RATE

CITY OF PASADENA ADOPTED FISCAL YEAR 2019 SCHEDULE OF TAXES, FEES, AND CHARGES

AN ORDINANCE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA HEREBY ORDAINS:

Alternative Financial Establishment Development Code Amendment Budget, Finance and Audit Committee February 28, 2011

TAUSSIG DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE JUSTIFICATION STUDY CITY OF ESCALON. Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban Economics Clean Energy Bonds

SCHEDULE OF APPLICATION FEES

Appendix A REAL ESTATE MARKET DEMAND ESTIMATE METHODOLOGY

RETAIL PROPERTY FOR SALE

Village of Manchester Retail Market Analysis

ZONING. 27 Attachment 1. Township of East Rockhill. Table of Use Regulations

Executive Summary. Fiscal Year ($ millions) Total Department Uses by Major Service Area 2, ,

City of Flagstaff. Retail Market Analysis

Rates Effective 1/1/2018 Water Residential and Commercial Charges CPI not applicable to base and consumption rates for Rates Effective 1/1/2017

Table : Allowed Uses in Neighborhood Residential Zones

Berkeley Municipal Code Page 1/5

Establishing a Progressive Payroll Expense Tax: Economic Impact Report

D R A F T M E M O R A N D U M

Fiscal Impact Analysis

Executive Summary Mission 2015 Interim Controls HEARING DATE: JULY 23, 2015

FOR SALE. For More Information:

The Economic Capture of the Downtown Phoenix Redevelopment Area. Prepared for:

Planning Department. FY Budget & Work Program. February 12, Keith DeMartini, Finance & IT Manager

CITY OF CORNER BROOK

Single Family Residence

Economic and Fiscal Update. Ben Rosenfield, Controller Ted Egan, Ph.D., Chief Economist City and County of San Francisco January 23, 2018

Economic Impact of the Proposed General Plan Update

Transportation Sustainability Program

SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY ORDINANCE NO. WAO- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY CODE

1.0 FISCAL BENEFITS OF PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN

City of Menifee Development Code Update

Christos Celmayster

Infrastructure Financing Plan. Infrastructure Financing District No. 1 (Rincon Hill Area) DRAFT

Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program

Economic Vitality and Fiscal Health6. Cabrillo College

Budget Year A Guide to San Francisco's Budget Process

LTABLE LAND USE TABLE

# 17 ASSETS: Severance Pay, RRSP and RIF 8-2 # 18 NET WORTH CALCULATION 8-4 # 19 MONTHLY RETIREMENT INCOME 8-6 # 20 MONTHLY RETIREMENT EXPENSES 8-7

990 Cherry Ave Suite 204, Long Beach Ca Direct Fax TRW International CUSTOMER AGREEMENT

OCTOBER 2017 EMPLOYMENT HOUSING REAL ESTATE TRANSIT & TOURISM

Memorandum. Background memorandum for Independence/Constitution Project fiscal impact analysis

3,052+/- Sq Ft Office-Retail Building For Sale or Lease 261 Main Street, Wareham, MA

BOARD OF APPEALS. Budget Presentation FY18 & FY19

Development Services. Current and Long-Range Planning Work Plan 2005/2006

San Francisco Multi-Purpose Venue Project. Fiscal Impact Analysis: Revenues. Draft Report. Prepared for: The City and County of San Francisco

Stormwater Management Program

SALES TAX ATTRIBUTABLE TO VISITORS

California Housing Market Update. Monthly Sales and Price Statistics November 2017

Central SoMa Area Plan:

FOR SALE E Harbor Blvd Ventura, California

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

FOR SALE 2528 De La Vina St, Santa Barbara, CA Cottage Hospital Rental Property 6 Units

Maximize Your Tax Refund For Small Businesses. By Juliet Kong, Enrolled Agent Kuha o Business Center, Molokai, January 29, 2019

VOLUME FINANCE HOUSING COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE EMPLOYMENT TRANSIT & TOURISM

Business Survey Report

424 W. PICO BLVD. PREMIER RETAIL SPACE IN THE HEART OF DTLA S SOUTH PARK NEIGHBORHOOD

City of Garland. Fee List (2015) Zoning Change or Specific Use Provision Applications

Business Licensing - Documents Required

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION

Special Improvement Districts (SIDs)/ Business Improvement Districts (BIDs)

CHAIR AND MEMBERS COMMUNITY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMITTEE OCTOBER 4, 2017

Report to the City Council

RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE

The National Flood Insurance Program and Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Francisco. Presentation at Treasure Island Community Meeting

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS

For Sale ± 1.25 Acres 2 Bay Chevron Service Station East John Ralston Road, Houston, TX 77029

Table SC-1 PERMITTED AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES SOUTH CAPE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. P - Permitted SE - Special Exception - - Not Permitted

SAWS Guide to Development 2008 revision B

Table of License Fees for the Period Covering 4/1/2017-3/31/2018

Starting a new business in Downtown Wytheville

The Economic Impact Of Travel on Massachusetts Counties 2015

SAN FRANCISCO COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INVENTORY

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Randall Gross / Development Economics. with The Walker Collaborative and the Memphis Area Association of Governments

Personal Legal Plans Client Organizer 2018

Budgeting Your Money

2018 Development Charges Background Study The Cost of Growth. Council Workshop #2

EZ Corp. New Construction in Chicago, IL S. Western Ave. Chicago, IL For more info on this opportunity please contact:

2908 E Oakland Ave, Johnson City, TN 37601

San Antonio 4th Quarter 2014 RETAIL. Market Trends COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE INFORMATION

2015 End of Year Economic Update

Presented By: L. Carson Bise II, AICP President

2016 End of Year Economic Update

CITY COUNCIL UNFINISHED BUSINESS FEBRUARY 2, 2015 SHARED ECONOMY TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS

LUCY S APARTMENTS. Offered by Lloyd Kaipainen PC SJ Fowler Commercial

City of Antioch Development Impact Fee Study

SASKATCHEWAN WAGE SURVEY 2013: MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY DETAILED REPORT

SKECHERS HERMOSA BEACH DESIGN CENTER & EXECUTIVE OFFICES

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AT GOLD LINE FOOTHILL EXTENSION PASADENA STATIONS

City of San Gabriel Long-Term Financial Plan

SAN FRANCISCO COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INVENTORY

Transcription:

San Francisco s Formula Retail Economic Analysis Planning Commission Update: Phase 1 Preliminary Draft February 27, 2014

Today s Agenda Background & Project Overview Presentation Summary: Citywide Analysis of existing formula retail Initial Release of 4 DRAFT Issue Briefs Next steps Public and Stakeholder review of Issue Briefs Develop framework for Neighborhood Case Study selection Draft Neighborhood Case Study reports

Formula Retail Study -- Schedule Approximate Dates Scope of tasks Hearing Dates Completed January Initial Citywide and Supervisor District analysis Jan 17 & 22 Stakeholder focus group meetings Commission 1/23 Jan-Feb Today Upcoming Feb-March March Conduct issue brief research (4 topics) Phase 1: Refine citywide data; release draft of 4 issue briefs Begin Phase 2: Conduct neighborhood case studies (3); Continue Phase I refinements (issue briefs & citywide data) Stakeholder focus group meetings; Public feedback Commission 2/27 Commission 3/27 April Finalize Both Phase 1 and Phase 2 work Commission 4/24

Today s Agenda Project Origins & Overview Presentation Christopher Beland / Wikimedia Commons Summary: Citywide Analysis of existing formula retail Initial Release of 4 DRAFT Issue Briefs Next steps Public and stakeholder review of Issue Briefs Draft Neighborhood Case Studies Continued refinement of all work

Existing Formula Retail: Citywide Analysis

120% 100% 80% 60% 58% 69% Formula % Independent Retail Types: Number of Establishments % of Formula Retail Establishments % of Independent Retail Establisment Formula Retail as a % of All Retail Establishments 84% 100% 100% 40% 20% 0% Stores 23% 25% 10% 11% Restaurants & Bars 2% 6% 4% 18% 0% Retail Services Banks, Credit Unions, S&L Total 12%

120% Formula & Independent Retail Types: Square Feet 100% % of Formula Retail Establishments % of Independent Retail Establisment 92% 100% 100% 80% Formula Retail as a % of All Retail Establishments 60% 61% 63% 40% 31% 30% 31% 20% 17% 20% 14% 19% 0% Stores Restaurants & Bars 2% 6% Retail Services 1% Banks, Credit Unions, S&L Total

Four Issue Briefs 1. Understanding San Francisco s Formula Retail 2. Employment and Formula Retail 3. Formula Retail and the Real Estate Market 4. Changing the Definition of Formula Retail

Issue Brief No. 1: Understanding San Francisco s Formula Retail

Background and Methodology Zoning Districts were grouped into 4 categories: Commercial/Mixed-Use (MU) with FR Controls Commercial/Mixed-Use (MU) without FR Controls Industrial Zoning with no FR controls Residential Zoning with FR controls Because the Industrial and Residential Zoning Districts did not have enough FR establishments to produce robust results, most of the analysis is focused on the Commercial Mixed-Use Districts

Formula Retail Establishments as a Percent of Total Retail Establishments

Findings: Size of Establishments 90% 80% Formula and Independent Retail Establishments by Store Size 80% Percent of Establishments 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 61% Formula Retail Independent Retailers 20% 10% 0% 15% 3,000 or less 3,001-10,000 16% 16% 5% 1% 0.7% 3% 0.3% 2% 0.06% 10,001-20,000 20,001-50,000 Size of Establishment (Square Feet) More than 50,000 Unknown INTERIM DRAFT Sources: Dun & Bradstreet, 2012; Strategic Economics, 2014. Based on Dun & Bradstreet business data that have not been independently verified; all numbers are approximate.

Findings: Types of Establishments Most common types of retailers in Comm. MU Districts w. FR Controls Formula Retailers Independent Retailers Most common types of retailers in Comm. MU Districts w/o FR Controls Formula Retailers Independent Retailers Note: Logos shown are random selections used to illustrate retailers in San Francisco and by no means represent the full range of retailers.

Findings: Other Characteristics Formula Retail Establishments by Headquarters Location Outside of US 10% Independent Franchises* 8% San Francisco 14% Elsewhere in US 54% Elsewhere in California 14% INTERIM DRAFT *Franchises that are not owned by or legally linked to the parent company; headquarters location unknown. Sources: Dun & Bradstreet, 2012; Strategic Economics, 2014. Based on Dun & Bradstreet business data that have not been independently verified; all numbers are approximate.

Findings: Other Characteristics Formula Retail Establishments by Number of Corporate Family Members Unknown/ Franchises 17% 11 to 20 5% More than 1,045 50% 21 to 50 4% 51 to 375 13% 376 to 1,045 11%

Issue Brief No. 2: Employment and Formula Retail

Local Context: SF Labor Laws Local Laws Applicability Minimum Wage Ordinance Paid Sick Leave Ordinance Will apply equally to formula retailers and independent retailers, in general. Health Care Security Ordinance Family Friendly Workplace Ordinance Applies to firms with 20 or more workers, nationwide, which will generally include all formula retailers.

National Scale Large Firms (200+ workers) Small Firms (3-199 workers) Logos were selected to illustrate firm size and do not reflect employment benefits and practices discussed

Retail & Restaurant Employment in SF Approximately 47% of San Francisco s retail workers are employed at firms with multiple locations in California Within this retail sector, the industries that employ the most people in SF are: grocery, clothing, department stores, and health and personal care stores. Approximately 18% of the City s restaurant workers are employed at firms with multiple locations in California. Multiple site firms tend to employ more workers in SF than firms with single sites.

Average Weekly Retail and Restaurant Wages in SF All Stores Multiple-Site Single-Site Average for all workers in 2012 Retail Stores (overall) Electronics and Appliance Stores $1,680 N/A N/A $815 $820 $823 $1,650 $2,270 $980 Shoe Stores $510 $425 $640 Restaurants $490 $512 $485

Issue Brief No. 3: Formula Retail and the Real Estate Market

Findings: Understanding the Retail Market

Findings: Commercial Real Estate & FR $100 $200/square foot in Union Square $50 $60 per square foot in the Financial District $20 per square foot in outlying areas

Rents and FR CU Activity in the Mission Street NCT T-Mobile Pollo Campero Rents Autozone ICI Paints Subway AT&T $40.00 CU Approved CU Withdrawn Mission Street NCT Southern City Submarket $35.00 $30.00 $25.00 $20.00 $15.00 $10.00 $5.00 $0.00 Annual Retail Rental Rate (per Sq. Ft., NNN)

Issue Brief No. 4: Changing the Definition of Formula Retail

Number of Establishments Worldwide Formula Retail Establishments by Headquarters Location Outside of US 10% Independent Franchises* 8% San Francisco 14% Elsewhere in US 54% Elsewhere in California 14% INTERIM DRAFT *Franchises that are not owned by or legally linked to the parent company; headquarters location unknown. Sources: Dun & Bradstreet, 2012; Strategic Economics, 2014. Based on Dun & Bradstreet business data that have not been independently verified; all numbers are approximate.

Parent and Subsidiary Companies

Expanded Land Use Categories Land Use Potential Formula Establishments (a) Potential Formula Establishments as a % of Total Automobile Sale or Rental 50 24% Automotive Gas Station 40 31% Automotive Service Station and Repair 20 4% Hotel, Tourist 90 16% Service, Administrative 140 3% Service, Business or Professional 150 5% Service, Fringe Financial 30 16% Service, Medical 80 2% Service, Personal & Massage Establishment 50 2% Trade Shops 30 4% Wholesale Sales 160 4% Other (b) 30 4% Total 860 4% INTERIM DRAFT (a) Includes franchises and businesses with 12 or more total global corporate family members (branches or subsidiaries). (b) Includes ambulance service, animal hospital, automobile parking, automotive wash, other entertainment, mortuary, and storage land uses. Certain land uses excluded (light manufacturing, limited service financial, adult entertainment, neighborhood agriculture, large scale agriculture) from analysis because no corresponding NAICS codes were identified; remaining land uses (tobacco paraphernalia establishments, gift store tourist oriented, jewelry store) excluded because already covered under existing formula retail legislation. Columns may not add due to rounding. Sources: Dun & Bradstreet, 2012; Strategic Economics, 2014. Based on Dun & Bradstreet business data that have not been independently verified; all numbers are approximate.

Next Steps

Today s Agenda Project Origins & Overview Presentation Next steps Public and Stakeholder review of Issue Briefs Draft Neighborhood Case Studies: Assess relationship among formula retail, controls, and economic and neighborhood factors in 3 neighborhoods/commercial corridors Further Refinements of all work Christopher Beland / Wikimedia Commons

Next Steps: Formula Retail Study Approximate Dates Scope of tasks Hearing Dates Completed January Initial Citywide and Supervisor District analysis Jan 17 & 22 Stakeholder focus group meetings Commission 1/23 Jan-Feb Today Upcoming Feb-March March Conduct issue brief research (4 topics) Phase 1: Refine citywide data; release draft of 4 issue briefs Begin Phase 2: Conduct neighborhood case studies (3); Continue Phase I refinements (issue briefs & citywide data) Stakeholder focus group meetings; Public feedback Commission 2/27 Commission 3/27 April Finalize Both Phase 1 and Phase 2 work Commission 4/24

http://www.sf-planning.org/formularetail Controller s Study is now published. Will seek a presentation from the controller at this commission in March. Stay tuned Next Steps: Post-Study Policy Recommendations for the Commission s Consideration Potential Legislative Action by the Board of Supervisors

Thank you!