Project Document Cap. Bldg.

Similar documents
Handbook. CEWARN Rapid Response Fund (RRF)

Factsheet N 6 Project implementation: delivering project outputs, achieving project objectives and bringing about the desired change

European Commission Directorate General for Development and Cooperation - EuropeAid

Fact Sheet 14 - Partnership Agreement

ANNEX A - I. Note: it is important that each tenderer has read the Working Practice and its annexes very carefully.

Amendment Request Form National Authorities for Apprenticeships

PPP Regulation in Jordan

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 291 thereof,

Financial Monitoring of a Development Project by FMSF - A Concept Note

Recommendation of the Council on Good Practices for Public Environmental Expenditure Management

Office of the Auditor General of Norway. Handbook for the Office of the Auditor General s Development Cooperation

Guidance on a common methodology for the assessment of management and control systems in the Member States ( programming period)

Coordinators' day on ICT PSP project management Financial Issues, Reporting, payments, cost claims and Certification Modalities

3 rd Call for Project Proposals

Version: 14 June, IKI Guidelines for international applicants

COMMISSION DECISION. of on technical provisions necessary for the operation of the transition facility in the Republic of Croatia

ST/SGB/2018/3 1 June United Nations

Guide to Financial Issues relating to ICT PSP Grant Agreements

Financial Guidelines for Beneficiaries EDCTP Association October 2016


South Sudan Common Humanitarian Fund Allocation Process Guidelines

Partnership Agreement between the Lead Partner and the other project partners

ELIGIBILITY RULES. Rule No 1: Expenditure Actually Paid Out

Finance Procedure 4.22 PETTY CASH PROCEDURE - SERVICES

User s guide for filling in the Execution Report

Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency GRANT AGREEMENT FOR AN ACTION WITH MULTIPLE BENEFICIARIES AGREEMENT NUMBER [ ]

European GNSS Supervisory Authority

FINANCIAL REGULATION

Guideline Financial Report (E05)

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET

Budget Guidelines

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY. for the programming period

NCF 7 Project Implementation Manual

TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition. P8_TA-PROV(2017)0165 Discharge 2015: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

DEPARTMENT OF CANADIAN HERITAGE FINAL REPORT AUDIT OF THE CANADIAN HERITAGE INFORMATION NETWORK (CHIN)

PRINCE2. Number: PRINCE2 Passing Score: 800 Time Limit: 120 min File Version:

Guidelines for the Use of the Grant

IKI Guidelines for international applicants - IKI Selection Procedure 2018

Rule no. 18/2017. In force starting August 1 st, Published in the Official Journal, Part I no. 555 of July 13 th, 2017

CENTRAL FINANCE AND CONTRACTS UNIT (CFCU) POLAND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. Article 1 - Explanatory Statement

Financial Regulations applicable to College Senior Members and Staff

(Notices) COURT OF AUDITORS

Lexperanto association October 2016 TRANSPARENCY ID. Explanatory note

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR AN EXPENDITURE VERIFICATION OF A GRANT CONTRACT - EXTERNAL ACTION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION -

Prince2 Foundation.exam.160q

Committee on Budgetary Control

RS Official Gazette, No 55/2015, /correction 69/2015, 36/2007 and 29/2018

Terms of Reference for Financial Audit of Implementing Partners. UNICEF Nigeria Country Office Expenditures

WSSCC, Global Sanitation Fund (GSF)

Grants Management and Monitoring System. Overview of process workflows

Revised 1 Guidance Note on Financial Engineering Instruments under Article 44 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006

FRAMEWORK ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) the INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATION (the "IOM" or

Financial Procedures and Controls

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS PROCEDURE

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 231/2013 as regards safe-keeping duties of depositaries

OPERATIONAL INSTRUCTION REF. OI.IPMG ACCEPTANCE OF ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENTS

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Partnership Agreements

Recommendations which have been implemented have been removed from this report. The original numbering of recommendations has been retained.

FELLOWSHIP AGREEMENT

Transport Workers Union of Australia

Financial Management Policy

COMMISSION DECISION. of ON THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF THE SCHENGEN FACILITY IN CROATIA. (only the English text is authentic)

ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL FOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

ALDE POSITION PAPER ON EU BUDGET POST 2013

Provided by Scottish Widows Bank SUMMARY BOX SUMMARY BOX. The interest rate is variable. The current rate is shown in the table below.

EU For Serbia Financing for SMEs

CLEAN SKY FINANCIAL WORKSHOP 18/01/2018 QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

LAFOURCHE PARISH GOVERNMENT PURCHASING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Agricultural Greenhouse Gases Program. Recipient Guide Reporting and financial management

Action Fiche for Syrian Arab Republic. 1. IDENTIFICATION Support to the EU-Syria Association Agreement Programme (SAAP I)

1st Level Control in the North Sea Region Programme

FINANCIAL GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR EVENT MANAGEMENT

Braindumps.PRINCE2-Foundation.150.QA

Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency GRANT AGREEMENT FOR AN ACTION WITH MULTIPLE BENEFICIARIES AGREEMENT NUMBER [ ]

Guidelines for the AF DSP call for proposals

2. 5 of the 75 questions are under trial and will not contribute to your overall score. There is no indication of which questions are under trial.

Department of Enterprise, Trade & Employment

3.7 Monitoring Regional Economic Development Boards

Financial Regulation of the European Maritime Safety Agency. Adopted by the Administrative Board on 18 December 2013

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION - ECHO

PURCHASING CARD PROGRAM PROCEDURES MANUAL

Legal status and Financial capacity Guarantee Fund

PRINCE2-PRINCE2-Foundation.150q

Directive on Information relating to Corporate Governance (Directive Corporate Governance, DCG)

PAC Guidelines for Project Progress Report

Treasury Management Policy. Treasury Management Policy. Working Together. August Borders College 24/10/2011.

THE PASSPORT UNDER MIFID

Control activities that are part of the process are detailed in the riskcontrol

FAQ. Questions and answers relating to the 2014 call for proposals for NGO operating grants for funding in 2015 (Latest update September 2014)

REPORT 2016/081 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION

DESK REVIEW UNDP AFGHANISTAN OVERSIGHT OF THE MONITORING AGENT OF THE LAW AND ORDER TRUST FUND FOR AFGHANISTAN

Committee on Budgetary Control

Audit of Grants and Contributions

ANNEX VIII a STANDARD FORMATS AND TEMPLATES

Title Aggregated Procurement

Support to Farmers Organisations in Africa Programme (SFOAP) Main Phase Start-up Workshop Fiduciary Aspects Addis Ababa, March 2013

Authorised Officer is any officer permitted by an Appropriate Officer to authorise orders and contracts as per clause 2.5.

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Transcription:

Cover Page Year / Country: Project Title: Project No: (to be assigned by CEWARN Addis Ababa) Contents: Part A: Project Description 1. Overview 2. Problem description 3. Objective, results, approach 4. Collaboration with other agencies and government 5. Budget Part B: Approvals 6. Approvals Part C: Project Reporting and Closure 7. Reports 8. Audit report 9. Review of the Reports and Project Closure Part D: Supporting Information 10. SWOT Analysis 11. Presentation of the Local Peace Committee Part E: Help 12. Instructions on how to use this document 13. CEWARN standard rates Annexes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. This document was last updated on: by: (Name, Position): This file was closed on: CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 1/28

1. Overview 1.1 Requesting Committee (Local Peace Committee or CEWERU) 1.2 Project Title For LPC only: District / Region / Zone: For LPC only: Town / Village: Contact Person (Name, Position): Telephone: Fax: e-mail: Implementing organisation (if any): Project Manager in Charge (Name, Position): Telephone: Fax: e-mail: Banking Instructions: Bank name: Bank code: Account holder s name: Account number: 1.3 requested (The information in this sub-section must be copied from section 5. Budget) Local Currency: Amount in local currency:.00 Rate to USD: as of: (date) 1.4 Status (fill in date) Amount in USD: approved approved by LPC by CEWERU received at CEWARN decision by SteCom (see 6.5) implementation completed post-project review by SteCom 1.5 Reports received for months 1 to 3 for months 4 6 for months 7 12 (extension) closing report audit report (fill in date) 1.6 Remarks CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 2/28

2 Short Problem description 2.1 Capacity problem to be addressed Problem to be solved: Target group / institution(s): who lacks the capacity to design & implement RRF projects? What are symptoms? How do we know that the lack of capacity is a real hindrance? This section was last updated / changed by: (name, date, organisation) Ambitions, objectives and experiences: What are the target group s / institution s ambitions, visions and objectives? What have they done up to now to make these happen? What are the key experiences from these efforts with regard to capacity building? CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 3/28

3 Stakeholders and collaboration 3.1 Other organisations and agencies pursuing similar objectives List of other important organisations pursuing similar objectives: List out the main organisations that pursue similar objectives and /or may be important stakeholders in this capacity building project Name Responsibility / Programme / Project Operating when / since This section (3.1 to 3. 2) was last updated / changed by: (name, date, organisation) 3.2 Coordination & partnership Stakeholders and the institutional landscape: Briefly describe the role of each of the organisations mentioned above in view of policy and capacity for solving pastoral conflict What are their experiences and what is their status with regard to capacity? CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 4/28

How can coordination and be partnership ensured? Describe the main institutional partnerships and institutional relationship that need to be developed or managed for this project Describe any potential conflict of interest with any of these organisations Describe the main mechanisms for coordination (specify whether in place or planned) How can the benefits of this project be extended to these other groups with similar goals? Describe where partnerships have been agreed or could be agreed CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 5/28

4 Objective, results, approach 4.1 Objective and results Main objective of the project: this section (4.1 to 4. 5) was last updated / changed by: (name, date, organisation) Results to be achieved: Specify two to five main results: what will be different after the project? For each result, indicate a date (month / year) as a deadline For each result, describe how it will mainly be achieved and which main inputs will be required CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 6/28

4.2 Sustainability Does the project bring new tasks and responsibilities for the organisation(s) to be supported? If yes, how can these be maintained? 4.3 Approach and significance Approach What has been tried before, but didn t solve the problem? What are the lessons learned from these earlier attempts? What is special about this project? Why is it absolutely necessary? CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 7/28

4.4 Ownership How have the beneficiaries or target groups been involved in developing this project proposal? (tick where applicable) They have been consulted They have approved the project before it came to the LPC They will make a substantial contribution to the project They will themselves implement the project Explain: 4.5 Risk management Risks: What are the main risks that could slow down, derail or stop the project? What could be done by the project stakeholders to manage those risks? What could be done by others to minimise those risks? CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 8/28

5 Budget 5.1 Budget summary Local Currency: Amount in local currency:.00 Rate to USD: as of: Amount in USD: If USD is used as the local currency, you may just use Local Currency : USD, with the rate 1 ) If Rate to USD at the time of approval is different from the rate at the time of budgeting, the rate at the time of approval will be used to calculate the amount of money to be transferred 5.2 Project costs in local currency Activity / Type of Costs (Unit) (Rate) Costs Total Costs in Local Currency Total Costs in USD it may be helpful to add a more detailed budget as an annex 5.3 Explanatory notes Comments, explanations, on the budget 5.4 Co-financing Who else is or should be contributing to the project? which organisation or group has agreed to contribute; for what and which amount? CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 9/28

6 Approvals Because of the need to have the signatures in original, fax this page to 00251 113 -. and / or send it by mail or through courier to CEWARN, P.O. Box, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia with your signature; CEWARN Unit will scan and annex this page to the document 6.1 Approval by the Local Peace Committee (for projects originating at the LPC level) Date of the meeting: Name Organisation / Function (Chairperson) Signature 6.2 Comments by the Local Peace Committee Further explanations, comments or important constraints that the LPC would like to be known with regard to its decision: CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 10/28

6.3 Approval by the CEWERU 6.4 Comments by CEWERU Date of the meeting: Chairperson: Name Venue: Signature: Witness: Name Signature: Telephone No. of the Chairperson / contact person: Note here any important comments, considerations and constraints that may guide the decision-making by the CEWARN SteCom and the implementation through the LPC or implementing organisation: CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 11/28

6.5 Recommendation by the CEWARN Coordinator (Name) Recommendation by the CEWARN Coordinator to the CEWARN Director and the RRF Steering Committee: Formal criteria: backed by all parties / medium-term (one-year) perspective is clear / properly approved by LPC and CEWERU / project duration is one year maximum Substantive criteria: clarity of objectives and project rationale / coherence of the proposal / significance of the project objective and results / ownership by beneficaries and other stakeholders / comoplementarity with other initiatives / sustainability of impacts / risk / viability and cost-benefit If in an exceptional case the project costs more than 50k USD, a separate technical evaluation is commissioned and annexed CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 12/28

6.6 Approval by the CEWARN Director 6.7 Decision by the CEWARN Steering Committee 6.8 Comments and conditions set by the Steering Committee If total budget is less than 10 000 USD and the decision is urgent, the CEWARN Director may approve the project. He will present the projects approved by him to the subsequent Steering Committee and seek an overall confirmation of his decisions. Date of the approval: Name: Date of the meeting: Chairperson: Name Signature: Signature: Witness: Name Signature: Decision: Approved Rejected Requested for re-submission (see explanation below) Conditions and adjustments to the project; concerns and other information regarding its decision by the Steering Committee: If the SteCom approves a different budget, the project budget as per section 5 will be updated; the deviations from the original budget will be explained in 5.3 or in an annex If the project budget exceeds 10 000 USD, the SteCom may decide to provide funds in instalments; if so, the history of instalments and their settlement will be provided as an annex CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 13/28

7 Grant Agreement Project Title: (copy from 1.2) The CEWARN Unit, through its Executive Director, grants the requesting Local Peace Committee or CEWERU the amount of USD for the implementation of the project described in this document of the project with CEWARN s number. On receipt of a countersigned copy of this page, the CEWARN Unit will make the respective payment into the bank account named in the project document s section 1.1. This grant is governed by the following contractual conditions: a) The LPC / CEWERU undertakes this activity on its own behalf and not on behalf of the CEWARN Unit or IGAD. b) In carrying out this activity, the LPC / CEWERU ensures compliance with all applicable laws and regulations of persons working under its mandate, through contract or otherwise. c) The grant is exclusively used to pay for items, goods or services that are required to attain the project s objective as stated in sections 4.1 and further detailed in section 5; either by the LPC/ CEWERU itself or through its implementing organisation. d) The administration of the grant follows acknowledged practices of accounting in the recipient s country and, to the extent feasible, the IGAD Financial Manual (available at www.cewarn.org/rrf/ifm.pdf). Directly applicable rules are listed in section 14). e) A complete and accurate record of the funds received and expenses incurred unter this grant must be maintained by the LPC / CEWERU for at least four years after all grant funds are fully expended. If the LPC / CEWERU ceases to exist, its Authorised Representative will ensure that all relevant documents are handed over to the local government body for safe keeping. f) The LPC /CEWERU ensures compliance with the reporting and auditing requirements as set out in this project document and the RRF. The LPC / CEWERU will permit representatives of the CEWARN Unit to visit the activity site(s) at times convenient to the latter and to independently interview stakeholders and others concerned. g) The total amount of this grant, or any portion thereof, may be discontinued or called back at any time if, in the judgement of the CEWARN Unit, such action is necessary to comply with any law or directive governing the CEWARN Unit s functioning, or if the LPC / CEWERU fails in the opinion of the CEWARN Unit to make sufficient progress towards the objective of the project. h) The undersigned person acknowledges that she or he is duly authorised to accept this grant on behalf of the requesting LPC / CEWERU. Addis Ababa, Place: Date: Signature: Director, CEWARN Unit Signature: Name: Representative of the LPC/CEWERU (fax this page with original signature to: CEWARN, + 251 (11) 37 21 022 and mail the original by pouch) CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 14/28

8 Reports 8.1 Report for months 1 3 Is the project on track? fully mostly partly not The project should be redesigned: no yes Major achievements to date: Reporting date: Major problems to date: Name / Organisation of rapporteur: Recommendation for action: 8.2 Project expenditures in local currency as of: Note: only report actual expenditure; do not report commitments or plans! The total budget should be in line with the approved budget; but changes between budget lines are ok Activity / Type of expenditure Budget Spent Unspent Total Costs 8.3 Comments Further comments on expenditures and project financing: CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 15/28

8.4 Report for months 4 6 Is the project on track? fully mostly partly not The project should be redesigned: no yes Major achievements to date: Reporting date: Major problems to date: Name / Organisation of rapporteur: Recommendation for action: 8.5 Project expenditures in local currency as of: Note: only report actual expenditure; do not report commitments or plans! Include expenditures of month 1 3 in this report; i.e. spent is all money spent up to reporting date Activity / Type of expenditures Budget Spent Unspent Total Costs 8.6 Comments Further comments on expenditures and project financing: CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 16/28

8.7 Report for months 7 12 Is the project on track? fully mostly partly not The project should be redesigned: no yes Major achievements to date: Reporting date: Major problems to date: Name / Organisation of rapporteur: Recommendation for action: use this format only if the project needs extension beyond month 12; otherwise, use the Closing Report 7.11 8.8 Project expenditures in local currency as of: Note: only report actual expenditure; do not report commitments or plans! Include expenditures of month 1 12 in this report; i.e. spent is all money spent up to reporting date Activity / Type of Costs Budget Spent Unspent Total Costs 8.9 Comments Further comments on expenditures and project financing: CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 17/28

8.10 Project Closing Report Were the project objectives and results achieved? fully mostly partly not Major achievements: Major problems: What should be the next step to further improve the situation? 8.11 Lessons learned What are the lessons learned? with regard to the issue at hand / the problem the project tried to solve with regard to the planning with regard to project implementation. CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 18/28

9 Project Audit Report 9.1 Summary Names and organisation/ company of the auditors: The first-mentioned person is the auditor responsible for this report 1. 2. 3. The full audit report with all originals or copies of vouchers is to be sent to the CEWARN Unit, where it will be filed under this project s number. The audit was commissioned on (date) by (name): Function: Main results: s were spent in line with objectives and results of the project: fully mostly partly not could not be assessed Vouchers were found to be truthful / correct fully mostly partly not could not be assessed Financial / cash management processes and systems are adequate fully mostly partly not could not be assessed Amount of money affected by partly / not / could not be assessed : in local currency: in USD as per budget rate: Management summary and recommendations: CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 19/28

9.2 Comments Name: by LPC & implementers to auditors statement: Date: 9.3 Comments by CEWERU and / or Coordinator (include name and date) CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 20/28

9.4 Project expenditures as verified by the auditors in local currency: Activity / Type of expenditures and auditors comments Budget Spent Unspent Total Costs in USD as per the budget s rate: 9.5 Comments Name: If project funds are unspent, explain here the proposal how they will be handled; this will need confirmation from the SteCom Date: CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 21/28

10 Review of Closing and Audit Report by SteCom 10.1 Meeting of the CEWARN Steering Committee 10.2 Remarks Date of the meeting: Chairperson: Name Signature: Witness: Name Signature: Decision with regard to the closing report: Approved Rejected Requested for re-submission (see remarks below) Decision with regard to the audit report: Approved Rejected Requested for re-submission (see remarks below) If project funds are unspent, record here the SteCom s decision If issues need to be clarified with regard to the closing and audit reports, note here the precise questions 10.3 Final closure review Confirmation of the CEWARN Director that the project file can be closed Questions asked by the SteCom were clarified (explain how) Decision on funds unspent have been implemented (explain how) Prepared by: (name) Date: Decision: herewith is the project file closed. Name: Date: Signature: CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 22/28

11 Supporting information 11.1 SWOT Analysis This section (10.1 to 10.2) was last updated / changed by: (name, date, organisation) In pursuing its (their) objectives, the the organisation(s) to be supported display or are confronted with the following main Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats: For a guideline on SWOT analysis check SWOT at www.wikipedia.org Strenghts: Opportunities: Weaknesses: Threats: CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 23/28

12 Presentation of the Local Peace Committee(s) (only for capacity building projects for one or more LPCs) 12.1 Establishment Describe the establishment of the Local Peace Committee: When? By whom? Who were the key players? For which reason? 12.2 Formal Status Describe the formal status of the Local Peace Committee: How Is it recognised by local government and other official entities? 12.3 Partnerships Describe the partnerships of the Local Peace Committee: Who has been funding or is expected to fund activities of the LPC? Who has been collaborating, and on what? 12.4 Activities Describe activities of the Local Peace Committee, past, current and planned: CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 24/28

13 Instructions on how to use this document 13.1 General approach This document comprises the full story of any given project supported by the from the cradle to the grave. The most important advantage of this is that for each project there is only one document / file, which in turn means that it is easy : to find the relevant file for a project, to access all the important information about this project to check whether sufficient information is provided, and to ensure that all necessary processes from approval to closure of the file have been effected. Furthermore, this approach enhances the transparency and manageability of the for the wide group of RRF stakeholders: everybody knows from the outset what information should be provided by whom the file, from its inception and at the various stages of the project life cylce, is always to be kept on the CEWARN web site, from where it can be downloaded by anyone interested (or with access to the web site) whoever needs to update the file be it the LPC, the CEWARN Unit, the auditors,.. can do so from his home base or office, or indeed from any internet access point. 13.2 Annexes 13.3 File name and version control An important feature of the Acrobat file format is that PDF files can simply be annexed. This again means that all the relevant information, including detailed budgets and explanations, can easily be managed by mailing or faxing original documents to the CEWARN Unit, where they will be scanned and attached. Also, if for any reason an LPC cannot edit the form on a PC, it is sufficient to fax the information to the CEWARN Unit where it will be entered into the form, and the original submission will be annexed. Each project file has a unique name, assigned to it by the CEWARN Unit. The file name is CEWARN RRF PROJECT XXXX and YYYY MM DD. pdf, where XXXX is the project number and YYYY MM DD is the date when the file was last edited. Updated versions of the file will be e-mailed to the CEWARN Unit at rrf@cewarn.org, from where they will be uploaded to the web site. The CEWARN Unit also keeps all the earlier versions in an archive. CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 25/28

14 CEWARN Standard Rates and budgeting guidelines 14.1 Standard rates For budgeting purposes, the following rates shall apply: Activity / Type of expenditures Unit Explanation of Unit Rate per Unit (USD) 14.2 Other budgeting guidelines Budgeting should to the extent feasible follow the respective Member State s public sector budgeting rules and practice. All costs that are directly required to attain the project s objective can in principle be included. However, the cost must be reasonable. Importantly: Costs that imply a double benefit to any participant may not be included; for example DSA for a participant who will receive DSA or similar benefits from another organisation Costs that would benefit an official or an employee of a participating government office or non-governmental organisation (or their relatives) in any other way than by a direct compensation of true costs and expenditures It is the LPC s responsibility to post the budget as included in this document in public at sub-district and district offices in the area of project implementation. Rates for daily labour, cash-for-work, etc should not exceed what other organisations working in the same area or with the same target groups provide for them (cf. section 4, Collaboration). CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 26/28

In order to provide the implementing LPC with the necessary operational flexibility, it is allowed to increase or decrease the different lines or activities of the budget presented in section 5. However, it is not allowed to pay for items that are not listed in the budget, unless every such change has been specifically permitted by the CEWARN Coordinator. It is not allowable to exceed the budgeted total costs. 14.3 Other budgeting guidelines Budgeting should to the extent feasible follow the respective Member State s public sector budgeting rules and practice. All costs that are directly required to attain the project s objective can in principle be included. However, the cost must be reasonable. Importantly: Costs that imply a double benefit to any participant may not be included; for example DSA for a participant who will receive DSA or similar benefits from another organisation Costs that would benefit an official or an employee of a participating government office or non-governmental organisation (or their relatives) in any other way than by a direct compensation of true costs and expenditures It is the LPC s responsibility to post the budget as included in this document in public at sub-district and district offices in the area of project implementation. Rates for daily labour, cash-for-work, etc should not exceed what other organisations working in the same area or with the same target groups provide for them (cf. section 4, Collaboration). In order to provide the implementing LPC with the necessary operational flexibility, it is allowed to increase or decrease the different lines or activities of the budget presented in section 5. However, it is not allowed to pay for items that are not listed in the budget, unless every such change has been specifically permitted by the CEWARN Coordinator. It is not allowable to exceed the budgeted total costs. 14.4 Guidelines for financial administration In principle, financial administration follows the acknowledged practices of accounting in the recipient s country and, to the extent possible, the IGAD Financial Manual (available at www.cewarn.org/rrf/ifm.pdf). Specifically: a) Transactions shall be accounted for in accordance with their substance and economic reality, not merely their legal form. b) All transactions must be recorded within a reasonably short time, never later than two months from their effective date; recorded transactions must be real and properly valued. c) Generally, the accounts of an RRF project are to be kept in the form of a separate journal and/or cash book for the bank account into which the grant was paid d) Where petty cash is being used, a separate petty cash book (list of transactions) must be kept e) Each journal or cash book must have a person responsible for it, who administers it under the supervision of the LPC; the LPC ensures a proper dis- CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 27/28

14.5 Guidelines for procurement 14.6 Guidelines for the acquisition of assets charge and transfer of such responsibility f) Expenses must always be approved by two or more persons who are raccountable to the LPC g) To the extent possible, payments above 100 USD must be made by checque. h) Where expenses are paid for the transport or accommodation of groups, the names of all the individuals who are part of the group shall be recorded. The list of participants must be countersigned by the LPC head or his delegate. Procurements of goods and services must be tendered, or at least three competing offers must be solicited. Generally, public service procurement processes must be adhered to. Where this is not possible, exceptional practices must be justified in writing. Especially important: If it is impossible to obtain three valid offers, the reasons for this must be noted down on the procurement documents (possible reasons: no viable alternatives for location, no three suppliers for the item requested, etc.). Procurement decisions must be taken by a procurement committee established by the Local Peace Committee. The decisions of the committee and their justification must be recorded. Procurement above a value of 5 000 USD must closely follow procedures similar to those set out in the IGAD Financial Manual (section 8.6). If the grant is used to purchase, develop or build assets (machinery, buildings, cattle, etc.), the ownership of these assets must in line with the project s objectives be transferred to specific beneficiaries, individuals or organisations within the project s lifetime. Such transfers must be duly recorded and the respective documents are part of the project s financial accounting. CEWARN Project Document; file name: CEWARN RRF CAP BUILDING Project Document Form.doc 28/28