Final Rule Summary. Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System Program Year: FY2018

Similar documents
Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System

Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Program Year: 2019

Medicare Long-term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2016

Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System

Medicare Long-term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System

Medicare Long Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System

Medicare Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System

Medicare Long- Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Final Rule Federal Fiscal Year 2013 August 2012

Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System: Proposed Rule Federal Fiscal Year 2015 June 2014

About Mediware. + Rehabilitation and Respiratory Care Division years in business. + Specialists Knowledge & Experience. + Solution MediLinks

AHCA Summary of 2018 Skill Nursing Center Prospective Payment System Final Rule Our rates increase 1.0 percent starting October 1, 2017 July 31, 2017

Mike Cheek, Senior Vice President, Reimbursement Policy & Legal Affairs. David Gifford, Senior Vice President, Quality and Regulatory Affairs

HIGHLIGHTS. CMS estimates that the net market basket update would increase Medicare SNF payments by approximately $390 million in FY 2018.

Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System for Calendar Year 2014

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System Federal Fiscal Year 2015

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System Fiscal Year 2017

Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System for Calendar Year 2014

Medicare Program; FY 2017 Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

A unified payment system for post-acute care. Carol Carter September 25, 2017

Medicare Program; FY 2018 Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System. AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

HFMA s Regulatory Sound Bites. An Overview of the Final 2019 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule & Quick look at the Proposed 2019 OPPS

Medicare s RRP and HAC Programs

Medicare Program; Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities Prospective Payment System - Update

Prepare Your Lab for PAMA: Understand How Your Costs Compare to New Reimbursements! Brad Brimhall, MD, MPH March 21, 2017

Prospective Payment System for Long Term Care Hospitals: RY 2008 Proposed Rule

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Reform / Estimating the Federal Budgetary Effects of the AHCA/NCAL/Alliance Proposal

Final Rule Summary. Medicare Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models Program Years: October 1, December 31, 2021

2018 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

AHLA March Hospital IPPS Legislative and Regulatory Policy Update. John R. Hellow

Facility State National

FY 2015 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule: What You Need to Know. June 18, 2014

AT A GLANCE HOME HEALTH PPS: PROPOSED RULE FOR CY August 4, What You Can Do: Arial 12pt. The Issue:

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Measure

SUMMARY OF THE CY2011 MEDICARE END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM FINAL RULE

FY 2016 Inpatient PPS Final Rule

Estimate of Federal Payment Reductions to Hospitals Following the ACA

Draft Recommendations on the Update Factors for FY 2017

2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet

Medicare Program; End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System, Payment for

FY 2018 DRG Updates. Under both the Medicare PPS and the TRICARE DRG-based payment system, cases are

Beneficiary co-insurance for OPPS services is projected to decrease from 19.9 percent in CY 2015 to 19.3 percent in CY 2016.

Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System

Session 1: Mandated Report: Medicare Payment for Ambulance Services

Coverage Expansion [Sections 310, 323, 324, 341, 342, 343, 344, and 1701]

WYOMING MEDICAID IMPLEMENTATION OF APR DRGS

AAOS MACRA Proposed Rule Summary (Short)

Regulatory Advisor Volume Three

SUMMARY: This proposed rule requests public comment on proposed implementation for

What Regulatory Requirements are Responsible for the Transactions Standards?

Current State of Medicare. Robert Roth & John Hellow Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC

Current State of Medicare

The Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier under the 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. December 3, 2013

CY 2014 Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)

Forward-Looking Statements

Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) January Meeting Summary

UnityPoint Accountable Care Aligning Provider Incentives in Risk- Bearing, Value-Based Contracts. March 10, 2018

Medicare s RRP and HAC Programs

Medicare Program; End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System, Payment for

Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Knee Arthroplasty Measure. Measure Information Form 2019 Performance Period

2018 Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Scoring Overview

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act All CMS Provisions -- As of June 11, 2010

Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Payment Model Final Rule Fact Sheet

Form CMS Update Transmittals 20 and 21

Payment for Covered Services

The Medicare Update. Larry Goldberg Larry Goldberg Consulting National Health Care Advisor, McGladrey LLP

H.R. 4302, Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 AMA Summary March 28, 2014

State of Maryland Department of Health

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. 42 CFR Parts 405, 412, 413, 415, 422, 424, 485, and 488

Medicare payment policy and its impact on program spending

2018 Calendar of Key Anticipated Health Care Rules

CY 2018 Quality Payment Program Final Rule Summary

A Practical Discussion of Value and Quality Based Payments What Do I Do Now?

Healthcare Reform and Its Impact on the Care Delivery System

Department of Health and Human Services

Basics of Medicare Coverage and Payment. Tom Ault Health Policy Alternatives April 20, 2007

P.L : Provisions in the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007

February 19, Dear Ms. Verma,

HEALTH POLICY & EDUCATION SERIES

CMS PROPOSES KEY PROVISIONS OF MACRA PHYSICIAN PAYMENT SYSTEM FOR 2019

Evolving Payment Methods EVOLVING PAYMENT METHODS. Melinda Hancock National HFMA Chair Elect January 23, 2015

Hospital Value Based Purchasing

A Historical Perspective of HealthSouth

Medicare Program; End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System, Payment for

Opportunities for Orthopedic Specialists in BPCI Advanced

Final Recommendations on the Update Factors for FY 2018

Medicare at 50. R. B. Drennan, PhD Associate Professor Fox School of Business Temple University 28 January 2016

Final Recommendations for Updating the Quality-Based Reimbursement Program for Rate Year 2018 and 2019

2015 ANNUAL QUALITY AND RESOURCE USE REPORT

OVERVIEW OF THE MEDICARE END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE (ESRD) FINAL RULE CY 2018

The ACO Track One+ Model: New Rewards for Risk

MEDICARE-MEDICAID CAPITATED FINANCIAL ALIGNMENT MODEL QUALITY WITHHOLD TECHNICAL NOTES (DY 2 5)

2015 National Training Program. Lessons. Lesson 1 Legislative Updates. Module 4. Current Topics. July 2015

The Medicare Advantage program: Status report

Transcription:

Final Rule Summary Medicare Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System Program Year: FY2018 August 2017 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview and Resources... 2 IRF Payment Rate... 2 Wage Index, Labor-Related Share and Rural Adjustments... 3 Facility-Level Adjustments... 3 Case Mix Group Relative Weight Updates... 3 Outlier Payments... 4 Updates to the IRF Cost-to-Charge Ratio (CCR) Ceiling... 4 Removal of the 25 Percent Payment Penalty for IRF-PAI Late Submissions... 4 Refinements to the List of ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes for the 60 Percent Rule... 5 Updates to the IRF Quality Reporting Program (QRP)... 5 If you have any questions about this summary, contact Kathy Reep, FHA vice president of financial services, by email at kathyr@fha.org or by phone at (407) 841-6230.

OVERVIEW AND RESOURCES On August 3, 2017, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the federal fiscal year (FY) 2018 final payment rule for the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system (IRF PPS). The final rule reflects the annual update to the Medicare fee-forservice (FFS) IRF payment rates and policies. A copy of the final rule Federal Register and other resources related to the IRF PPS are available on the CMS Web site at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service- Payment/InpatientRehabFacPPS/Spotlight.html. An online version of the final rule is available at https://federalregister.gov/a/2017-16291. A summary of the final rule is provided below along with Federal Register page references for additional details. Program changes finalized by CMS would be effective for discharges on or after October 1, 2017, unless otherwise noted. IRF PAYMENT RATE Federal Register pages 36247-36248, 36251-36254 Incorporating the final updates with the effect of budget neutrality adjustments, the table below shows the final IRF standard payment conversion factor for FY2018 compared to the rate currently in effect: IRF Standard Payment Conversion Factor Final FY2017 $15,708 Final FY2018 $15,838 (proposed at $15,835) Percent Change +0.83 (proposed at +0.81) The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) mandated that the annual update factor for FY2018, after all Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) productivity adjustments, would be 1.0 percent. The table below provides details of the proposed updates to the IRF payment rate for FY2018: Market Basket Update PPACA-Mandated Productivity Reduction PPACA Pre-Determined Reduction Mandated 1.0 Percent Market Basket Update Due to MACRA Wage Index/Labor-Related Share Budget Neutrality Case Mix Group Relative Weight Revisions Budget Neutrality Overall Rate Change IRF Proposed Rate Updates (Percent) +2.6 (proposed at +2.7) -0.6 percentage points (proposed at -0.4 percentage points) -0.75 percentage points (proposed at -0.75 percentage points) -0.25 (proposed at -0.54) 1.0007 (as proposed) 0.9976 (proposed at 0.9974) -0.6 percentage points (proposed at -0.4 percentage points) 2

WAGE INDEX, LABOR-RELATED SHARE AND RURAL ADJUSTMENTS Federal Register pages 36248-36251 The labor-related portion of the IRF standard rate is adjusted for differences in area wage levels using a wage index. CMS is not making any major changes to the calculation of Medicare IRF wage indexes. As has been the case in previous years, CMS will use the prior year s inpatient hospital wage index, the FY2017 pre-rural floor and pre-reclassified hospital wage index, to adjust payment rates under the IRF PPS for FY2018. A complete list of the final wage indexes for payment in FY2018 is available on the CMS Web site at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service- Payment/InpatientRehabFacPPS/Data-Files.html. CMS is adopting a wage index budget neutrality factor of 1.0007 for FY2018 due to adjustments and updates to the IRF wage index. Based on updates to this year s market basket value, CMS is adopting a small decrease to the labor-related share of the standard rate from 70.9 percent for FY2017 to 70.7 percent (as proposed) in FY2018. This change will provide a small increase to IRFs with a wage index less than 1.0. Rural Adjustments: The adoption of revised OMB delineations for the FY2016 IRF PPS wage index resulted in 19 IRF providers having their status changed from rural to urban, resulting in a loss of a 14.9 percent rural adjustment. These 19 IRF providers were provided a gradual phaseout of their rural adjustment over a three-year period. FY2018 is the last year of the three-year phase-out of the rural adjustment and these IRFs will receive the full FY2018 wage index with no rural adjustment. FACILITY-LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS Federal Register page 36247 There are no changes to the facility-level adjustments. In FY2018, CMS will continue to hold the facility-level adjustments at the FY2014 levels as they continue to evaluate IRF claims data. CASE MIX GROUP RELATIVE WEIGHT UPDATES Federal Register pages 36244-36247 CMS assigns IRF discharges to case mix groups (CMGs) that are reflective of the different resources required to provide care to IRF patients. Patients are first categorized into rehabilitation impairment categories (RICs) based on the primary reason for rehabilitative care. Patients are further categorized into CMGs based upon their ability to perform activities of daily living or based on age and cognitive ability. Within each of the CMGs there are four tiers, each with a different relative weight that is determined based on comorbidities. Currently, there are 87 CMGs with four tiers and another five CMGs that account for very short stays and patients who die in the IRF. Each year, CMS updates the CMG relative weights and average length of stay (ALOS) with the most recent available data. CMS is updating these factors for FY2018 using FY2016 claims data and FY2015 IRF cost reports. To compensate for the CMG weight changes, CMS is applying a FY2018 case mix budget neutrality factor of 0.9976 (proposed at 0.9974). 3

CMS is not making any changes to the CMG categories/definitions. Using FY2016 claims data, CMS analysis shows that 99.3 percent of IRF cases are in CMGs and tiers that would experience less than a +/-5 percent change in its CMG relative weight as a result of the updates. A table that lists the final FY2018 CMG payment weights and ALOS values is provided on Federal Register pages 36245-36246. The changes in the ALOS values for FY2018, compared with FY2017, are small and do not show any particular trends in IRF length of stay patterns. OUTLIER PAYMENTS Federal Register pages 36254-36255 Outlier payments were established under the IRF PPS to provide additional payments for extremely costly cases. Outlier payments are made if the estimated cost of the case exceeds the payment for the case plus an outlier threshold. Costs are determined by multiplying the facility s overall cost-to-charge ratio (CCR) by the allowable charges for the case. When a case qualifies for an outlier payment, CMS pays 80 percent of the difference between the estimated cost of the case and the outlier threshold. CMS has established a target of 3.0 percent of total IRF PPS payments to be set aside for high cost outliers (HCOs). To meet this target for FY2018, CMS is updating the outlier threshold value to $8,679 (proposed at $8,656), an 8.7 percent increase compared to the current threshold of $7,984. UPDATES TO THE IRF COST-TO-CHARGE RATIO (CCR) CEILING Federal Register page 36255-36256 CMS applies a ceiling to IRF s CCRs. If an individual IRF s CCR exceeds this ceiling, that CCR is replaced with the appropriate national average CCR for that fiscal year, either urban or rural. The national urban and rural CCRs and the national CCR ceiling for IRFs are updated annually based on analysis of the most recent data that are available. The national urban and rural CCRs are applied when: New IRFs have not yet submitted their first Medicare cost report; IRFs overall CCR is in excess of the national CCR ceiling for the current fiscal year; or Accurate data to calculate an overall CCR are not available for IRFs. CMS will continue to set the national CCR ceiling at three standard deviations above the mean CCR, and therefore CMS is adopting a national CCR ceiling for FY2018 of 1.31 (proposed at 1.28). If an individual IRF s CCR exceeds this ceiling for FY2018, the IRF s CCR will be replaced with the appropriate national average CCR, urban or rural. CMS is adopting a national average CCR of 0.518 (proposed at 0.516) for rural IRFs and 0.416 (as proposed) for urban IRFs. REMOVAL OF THE 25 PERCENT PAYMENT PENALTY FOR IRF-PAI LATE SUBMISSIONS Federal Register page 36256-36257 The IRF-PAI is a data collection instrument through which IRFs are required to collect and electronically submit patient data for all Medicare Part A FFS patients. Currently, to encourage 4

timely filing of data, the failure to submit the data within the required deadline results in a 25 percent payment penalty. In 2012, CMS issued an edit within the Fiscal Intermediary Shared System (FISS) in which, if an IRF attempts to submit a Medicare Part A FFS claim for a patient and there is not a corresponding IRF-PAI on file for the patient to match with the claim, the FISS will return an error to the IRF provider advising that an IRF-PAI needs to be submitted. Therefore, IRFs can only receive payment from Medicare for a Medicare Part A FFS patient when both an IRF claim and IRF-PAI are submitted. CMS believes this is an incentive to file patients IRF-PAIs in a timely manner and therefore the 25 percent payment penalty is no longer needed. CMS is removing the 25 percent payment penalty for IRF-PAI late submissions beginning with FY2018. REFINEMENTS TO THE LIST OF ICD-10-CM DIAGNOSIS CODES FOR THE 60 PERCENT RULE Federal Register page 36257-36269 The compliance percentage has been part of the criteria for defining IRFs since 1983. In FY2015, CMS developed the 60 percent rule, which consists of two different methods to test if an IRF complies. To align with the presumptive method CMS is adopting a new list of ICD-10- CM diagnosis codes that should count towards the rule for all IRF discharges occurring on or after October 1, 2017. The final revised lists (with changes from the proposed) are posted on the IRF PPS Web site at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service- Payment/InpatientRehabFacPPS/Downloads/ICD-10-CM-DataFiles.zip. CMS is also adopting a formal process to distinguish between non-substantive updates to the ICD-10-CM codes on the list of codes that should count towards the 60 percent rule that would be made through sub-regulatory updates and substantive revisions that would be made only through the proposed and final rulemaking process. UPDATES TO THE IRF QUALITY REPORTING PROGRAM (QRP) Federal Register page 36269-36299 CMS collects quality data from IRFs on measures that relate to five stated quality domains and three stated resource domains. IRFs that do not successfully participate in the IRF QRP are subject to a 2.0 percentage point reduction to the market basket update for the applicable year; the reduction factor value is set in law. For FY2018 payment determinations, CMS will use data collected on a total of 13 previously adopted quality measures. The following lists the IRF QRP measures and applicable payment determination years: Previously Adopted IRF Measures for FY2018 Payment Determinations Payment IRF QRP Measures NQF # Determination Year National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) Outcome Measure #0138 FY2015+ Influenza Vaccination Coverage among Healthcare Personnel #0431 FY2016+ 5

Previously Adopted IRF Measures for FY2018 Payment Determinations Payment IRF QRP Measures NQF # Determination Year Percent of Residents or Patients Who Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (Short Stay) NHSN Facility-Wide Inpatient Hospital-Onset Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia Outcome Measure NHSN Facility-Wide Inpatient Hospital-Onset Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) Outcome Measure All-Cause Unplanned Readmission Measure for 30 Days Post-Discharge from IRFs Percent of Residents or Patients with Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened (Short Stay) An Application of Percent of Residents Experiencing One or More Falls with Major Injury (Long Stay) An application of Percent of LTCH Patients with an Admission and Discharge Functional Assessment and a Care Plan That Addresses Function IRF Functional Outcome Measure: Change in Self-Care Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients IRF Functional Outcome Measure: Change in Mobility Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients IRF Functional Outcome Measure: Discharge Self-Care Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients IRF Functional Outcome Measure: Discharge Mobility Score for Medical Rehabilitation Patients Discharge to community Post-Acute Care IRF, with the added exclusion of patients with a hospice benefit in the 31-day post-discharge observation window Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary Post-Acute Care IRF Potentially Preventable 30 Day Post-Discharge Readmission Measure for IRFs Potentially Preventable Within Stay Readmission Measure for IRFs Drug Regimen Review Conducted with Follow-Up for Identified Issues (assessment-based) #0680 FY2017+ #1716 FY2017+ #1717 FY2017+ #2502 #0678 FY2017+ *refined for FY2018+ FY2014+ *refined for FY2018+ #0674 FY2018+ #2631 FY2018+ #2633 FY2018+ #2634 FY2018+ #2635 FY2018+ #2636 FY2018+ CMS is removing the All-Cause Unplanned Readmission Measure for 30 Days Post-Discharge from the IRF QRP beginning FY2019. CMS is also removing the current Percent of Residents or Patients with Pressure Ulcers That Are New or Worsened (Short Stay) (NQF #0678) measure and replacing it with a modified version of the measure, Changes in Skin Integrity Post-Acute Care: Pressure Ulcer/Injury for the FY2020 IRF QRP. CMS is also considering the following measures for the IRF QRP quality measures for future years: Experience of Care; Application of Percent of Residents Who Self-Report Moderate to Severe Pain; and Modification of the Discharge to Community Post-Acute Care. CMS is considering methods to account for social risk factors in the IRF QRP such as income, education, race and ethnicity, employment, disability, community resources, and social support. CMS sought comment in the proposed rule on how to incorporate social risk factors and which 6

social risk factors should be incorporated. A discussion of these comments is on Federal Register pages 36273-36274. To comply with the IMPACT Act, in order to enable access to longitudinal information and to facilitate coordinated care, CMS is requiring that IRFs begin reporting standardized patient assessment data with respect to five specified patient assessment categories required by law for the FY2020 IRF QRP, including: Functional status; Cognitive function; Special services, treatments, and interventions; Medical conditions and comorbidities; and Impairments. CMS is not finalizing the standardized patient assessment data elements that were proposed for the FY2020 IRF QRP for cognitive function, special services, treatments and interventions, and impairments due to the newly imposed reporting burden they would cause on IRFs. However, CMS is finalizing the standardized resident assessment data elements for the other two patient assessment categories, functional status and medical conditions and comorbidities. 7