Howard Weil Energy Conference. March 29, 2011

Similar documents
Investor Presentation April 2012

Investor Presentation August 2012

Delek US Holdings, Inc./ Delek Logistics Partners, LP Wells Fargo Energy Symposium December 2013

Delek US Holdings Reports Second Quarter 2018 Results

Delek US Holdings Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results

DELEK US HOLDINGS REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2010 RESULTS

Delek US Holdings. Investor Presentation

Investor Presentation

Shai Even Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Citi One-on-One MLP/Midstream Infrastructure Conference - August 2014

Shai Even. Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Citi 2015 MLP/Midstream Infrastructure Conference August 2015

PBF Energy June 2018

Alon USA Energy, Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2016 Results

ALON USA ENERGY, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

Unlocking Our Potential Delek US Holdings, Inc Annual Report

Alon USA Energy, Inc. Reports First Quarter 2014 Results

Alon USA Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2012 Results

Alon USA Reports Second Quarter Results

Delek US Holdings, Inc. Citi 2018 Global Energy & Utilities Conference

Alon USA Energy, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Results

Paul Eisman President & Chief Executive Officer January 2015

PBF Energy March 2018

Paul Eisman President & Chief Executive Officer Credit Suisse Annual Energy Summit February 2015

PBF Energy January 2019

Valero Energy Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results

Valero Energy Reports Third Quarter 2016 Results

Alon USA Energy, Inc. Reports First Quarter 2016 Results

Delek US Holdings, Inc. Scotia Howard Weil Energy Conference

Alon USA Reports First Quarter Results

Alon USA Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2010 Results

Valero Energy Reports First Quarter 2018 Results

Alon USA Reports Third Quarter Results

PBF Energy Inc. (NYSE: PBF)

Valero Energy Reports 2017 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results

Delek Logistics Partners, LP. Investor Presentation

Delek US Holdings, Inc. Investor Presentation - Tel Aviv Stock Exchange

Marathon Petroleum Corporation Reports First-Quarter 2015 Results

Valero Energy Reports Third Quarter 2017 Results

ALON USA ENERGY, INC.

Alon USA Reports Second Quarter Results

Alon USA Reports Second Quarter Results

Alon USA Reports Third Quarter Results

Forward-Looking Statements

Delek US Holdings, Inc. Raymond James Institutional Investors Conference

Holly Energy Partners, L.P.

Alon USA Reports 2008 Results

Alon USA Partners, LP Reports Second Quarter 2017 Results and Declares Quarterly Cash Distribution

CVR REFINING REPORTS 2013 SECOND QUARTER RESULTS

First Quarter Financial Results Conference Call M AY 6,

Driven to Create Value

NYSE: MMP. RBC Capital Markets Midstream Conference

INVESTOR PRESENTATION DECEMBER 2018

Alon USA Partners, LP Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2013 Results

Alon USA Reports First Quarter Earnings; Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend

NYSE: MMP. Citi One-on-One MLP / Midstream Infrastructure Conference

Citi MLP / Midstream Infrastructure Conference. Las Vegas Aug. 2016

Credit Suisse MLP and Energy Logistics Conference

Alon USA Partners, LP Reports First Quarter 2017 Results and Declares Quarterly Cash Distribution

Alon USA Partners, LP Reports Second Quarter 2016 Results and Declares Quarterly Cash Distribution

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10-Q

HollyFrontier Corporation Reports Quarterly Net Income

RESULTS FOR Q ANALYST TELECONFERENCE

NGL s Markets Beyond Mont Belvieu

Investor Presentation. September 2016

PBF Logistics LP (NYSE: PBFX)

HollyFrontier Corporation

INVESTOR PRESENTATION MAY 2018

ALON USA ENERGY, INC.

Delek Logistics Partners, LP. Investor Presentation

MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. Bank of America High Yield Energy & Power Leveraged Finance Conference JUNE 2, 2015

Fourth-Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast. February 1, 2018

NYSE: MMP. SunTrust Midstream Summit

INVESTOR PRESENTATION JANUARY 2018

Alon USA Partners, LP Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2015 Results

Can LOOP Ever Be a Gulf Coast Cushing? Part 2 Searching for a sour crude benchmark.

Jefferies Industrials Conference

New and emerging price benchmarks in the Americas

HollyFrontier Corporation

Investor Presentation

NYSE: MMP. MLP and Energy Infrastructure Conference

Investor Presentation. January 2013

Investor Presentation March 26, 2012

RESULTS FOR Q ANALYST TELECONFERENCE

Wells Fargo Wells Fargo 2014 Energy Symposium Annual Energy Symposium

Deutsche Bank U.S. Independent Refiners Conference January 9, 2014

DELEK US HOLDINGS, INC.

Delek US Holdings to Acquire Remaining Outstanding Shares of Alon USA

PBF Energy. Annual Shareholders Meeting May 21, 2014

2017 MLPA Investor Conference. May 31, 2017

Pricing of Canadian Oil Sands Blends

Investor Relations. September 2018

MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. Deutsche Bank Leveraged Finance Conference September 29, 2015

HollyFrontier Corporation

Energy and commodity price benchmarking and market insights

Wells Fargo Annual Pipeline and MLP Symposium

Alon USA Partners Reports Second Quarter Results

Casper Terminal Acquisition

NuStar Energy, L.P. NEUTRAL ZACKS CONSENSUS ESTIMATES (NS-NYSE) SUMMARY

HOLLYFRONTIER INVESTOR PRESENTATION

DELEK US HOLDINGS, INC.

PBF Energy Inc. (NYSE: PBF) January 2017 Investor Presentation

Transcription:

Howard Weil Energy Conference March 29, 2011

Safe Harbor Provision Delek US Holdings is traded on the New York Stock Exchange in the United States under the symbol DK and, as such, is governed by the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. This presentation may contain forward-looking statements that are based upon current expectations and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Statements concerning our current estimates, expectations and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities and other statements, concerns, or matters that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, as that term is defined under United States securities laws. Investors are cautioned that the following important factors, among others, may affect these forward-looking statements. These factors include but are not limited to: our ability to complete the Lion Oil transaction; management s ability to execute its strategy of growth through acquisitions and transactional risks in acquisitions; our competitive position and the effects of competition; the projected growth of the industry in which we operate; changes in the scope, costs, and/or timing of capital projects; losses from derivative instruments; general economic and business conditions, particularly levels of spending relating to travel and tourism or conditions affecting the southeastern United States; risks and uncertainties with the respect to the quantities and costs of crude oil, the costs to acquire feedstocks and the price of the refined petroleum products we ultimately sell; potential conflicts of interest between our majority stockholder and other stockholders; and other risks contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results and will not be accurate indications of the times at, or by which such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking information is based on information available at the time and/or management s good faith belief with respect to future events, and is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements. Delek US undertakes no obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking statements. 2

Diversified Downstream Energy Company(1) Breadth of Exposure Across Refining, Wholesale Marketing and Retail Distribution Refining Segment Inland, moderate complexity Gulf Coast refinery Marketing ) Segment Owned product terminals and pipeline assets in West Texas Retail Segment Operate 412 convenience stores own ~60% of underlying real estate Refining & Marketing Assets in Texas; Retail Network Spans Throughout the Southeastern U.S. Refining and Wholesale Presence Retail Distribution Presence Tyler, TX Refinery 60,000 BPD 9.4 complexity (1) As of December 31, 2010 3

Lion Oil Transaction Executive Summary

Transaction Summary Asset Overview Purchase Summary 80,000 BPD refinery in El Dorado, Arkansas 80-mile Magnolia-El Dorado crude oil system (Shreveport, LA to Magnolia terminal) 28-mile El Dorado crude oil system (Magnolia terminal to El Dorado refinery) Crude oil gathering system with more than 800 miles of pipelines 3 light product distribution terminals (Memphis and Nashville, TN; El Dorado, AR) Owned asphalt distribution terminal in El Dorado, Arkansas Delek US has agreed to acquire Ergon s 53.7% equity interest in Lion Oil for a combination of cash, stock and the payment and replacement of all debt currently owed by Lion to Ergon as follows: $45 million in restricted Delek US Common Stock(1) Lion Oil and/or Delek US will make a cash payment of approximately $50 million to Ergon Lion Oil will execute a new $50 million term note payable to Ergon that will be guaranteed by Delek US; and Lion Oil will divest certain non-refining assets to Ergon In addition, Delek US has agreed to assist Lion Oil in obtaining third-party financing of working capital previously provided by Ergon (1) Determined by the average closing price of Delek US common stock as reported on the NYSE for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the closing date 5

Financial Highlights From March 21 st Announcement Key Financial Disclosures Regarding The Lion Oil Transaction(1) Lion Oil Company generated approximately $92 million in contribution margin during calendar 2010 All other overhead, marketing and terminal fees were less than $1 per barrel in recent years Depreciation estimated at approximately $45 million annually, but acquisition valuations may materially reduce this expense in the future Potential overhead synergies and cost reduction opportunities (1) As indicated on the Lion Oil transaction announcement conference call held on March 21, 2011 6

El Dorado, Arkansas Refinery Inland, PADD III Refinery With Broad Distribution Footprint Throughout the Mid-Continent Production and Complexity Medium Sour Crude Oil Refinery Key Sources of Crude Products Manufactured Compliance with Regulatory Mandates 80,000 BPD nameplate capacity 9.0 complexity rating Typical crude gravity 30.5 API Typical crude sulfur 1.75% Local Arkansas crude gathering system (21% of crude slate) Offshore Louisiana and foreign crudes Gasoline and ultra-low sulfur diesel fuels Asphalt, refinery grade propylene, LPG Clean fuels compliant (ULSD, LS gasoline) Benzene reduction in gasoline (MSAT II) complete in July 2011 Key Product Distribution Capital Spending Enterprise Products Pipeline (TEPPCO) Mississippi River Valley, Ohio River Valley Invested $470 mm in El Dorado since 2007; major projects complete Maintenance CAPEX levels - $25 mm CAPEX expected in 2011 Turnaround 7

Combined Asset Overview Refining Segment Marketing Segment Other Delek US (Dec. 31, 2010) 1 refinery, Tyler, TX PADD III 60,000 BPD 9.4 complexity High conversion 3 company-owned terminals 7 product pipelines Crude pipelines 412 retail company operated retail locations More than 60% of underlying real estate is owned Lion Oil 1 refinery, El Dorado, AR PADD III 80,000 BPD 9.0 complexity Clean fuels compliant 3 light product terminals Memphis and Nashville, TN and El Dorado, AR Connected to Enterprise Products Pipeline Asphalt distribution business; owned asphalt terminal in El Dorado, AR Delek US (Post-Transaction) 2 PADD III refineries 140,000 BPD Moderate complexity Expanded crude slate Expanded product mix Scales logistics business to include distribution points throughout the Gulf Coast and Mid- Continent regions Diversified set of downstream assets 8

Combined Asset Map Tyler Refinery El Dorado Refinery Delek US Terminals Lion Oil Terminals Crude Pipelines West Texas Crude Product Pipelines Louisiana Offshore Crude Foreign Crude 9

Key Strategic Opportunities Optimize Crude Slate Increased access to wide range of domestic, offshore & foreign crude oils Adding capability to process medium sour crudes Access to crudes priced on both a WTI and Brent-basis Enhance Production Capabilities More than doubles production capacity above pre-transaction levels Entry point into asphalt market Still heavily weighted toward light, high-value products post-transaction Capture Supply Chain Synergies Supply chain synergies with (MAPCO) retail store network Lion has two light product terminals in Tennessee More than 200 MAPCO locations operating in Tennessee and Arkansas Expand Wholesale Marketing Business Expand wholesale marketing business into the Mid-Continent Wholesale distribution strategy designed to optimize margin capture Other Strategic Benefits Eliminate single-asset refiner risk Limited capital requirements over the near-term Overhead cost savings 10

El Dorado Refinery Crude Slate (Calendar 2010) El Dorado processes a combination of local Arkansas, domestic offshore and foreign crude oils Saudi Arabia Crude Oil 31% Other Crude Oil(2) 3% Local Arkansas Crude Oil 21% Local Arkansas Crudes are WTIlinked Louisiana Offshore Crude Oil(1) 45% (1) Louisiana Offshore crude oil includes: Eugene Island, Louisiana Light Sweet, Mars, North Louisiana Sweet, Poseidon and Thunder Horse Blend (2) Other crude oils includes: Yoho condensate, Basrah Light and Appalachian Light Sweet 11

Transaction Expected To Diversify Delek US Crude Slate Balanced Exposure Less Dependence on Light, Sweet Crude Pricing Crude Slate Becomes More Balanced Essentially 50/50 (Sour-intermediate vs. Light) Crude Slate Transition - Pre/Post Transaction Tyler Refinery El Dorado Refinery Pro-Forma (Combined) Sour / Intermediate 5% Light/Sweet 13% Light/Sweet 49% Light/Sweet 95% Sour / Intermediate 87% Sour / Intermediate 51% 12

El Dorado Unit Capacities Unit Description Present Capacity (BPD)(1) (1) Per the Lion Oil transaction announcement conference call held on March 21, 2011: In 2009, Lion Oil estimated that approximately $150 million in capital spending would be required to take advantage of the 100,000 barrel a day crude and vacuum unit capacity 13

El Dorado Capacity Utilization Above 90% In 2010 El Dorado Production Capabilities Improved After Turnaround in 2009(1) 90% 86% 84% 91% 72% Turnaround 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 (1) 2010 assumes nameplate capacity of 80,000 BPD following major turnaround and expansions projects in 2009; nameplate capacity 2006-2009 is estimated at 71,500 BPD 14

Anticipated Combined Product Slate(1) Tyler Refinery El Dorado Refinery Pro-Forma (Combined) Diesel/Jet 36% Other 7% Diesel/Jet 38% Asphalt 17% Diesel/Jet 37% Asphalt 10% Other 5% Other 4% Gasoline 57% Gasoline 41% Gasoline 47% (1) Other includes LPG, Black Oil and other residual products 15

Light Product Marketing Throughout the Mid-Continent Access To The Enterprise Products Pipeline(1) Tyler and El Dorado Expected To Ship Product North Integration Opportunity Expand Retail Store Presence In Adjacent Markets Expands marketing opportunity into the Mid-Continent Supply markets that support better margins El Dorado expected to supply MAPCO store locations In Tennessee and Arkansas Opportunity to build/acquire new store locations in markets adjacent to El Dorado (i.e. Little Rock, Arkansas) (1) Formerly the TEPPCO pipeline system 16

Summary of Potential Transaction Synergies Crude Supply Improves crude procurement expertise Optimize crude slate between Tyler and El Dorado Production Distribution Eliminate single refinery risk Staggered turnarounds minimize supply disruptions Diversified product slate provides opportunity to capitalize on U.S. economic recovery Realize supply synergies between refining and retail Expand wholesale marketing through Enterprise system Develop long-term product supply contracts on third-party pipelines 17

Major Capital Projects Have Been Completed Historical/Projected Capital Spending at Tyler and El Dorado ($MM) Delek US* Lion Combined $350 $320 $300 $250 $251 $200 $150 $123 $185 $169 $165 $155 $100 $82 $50 $62 $54 $50 $42 $25 $25 $12 $0 CY07 CY08 CY09 CY10 CY11 (E) *Includes refining segment only; 2009 capital spending includes cost to rebuild saturated gas plant 18

Transaction Financing Overview Need $145 mm = Equipment and Shares Expected Source $45 mm in Restricted Delek US Common Stock(1) Expected Source $50 mm from loan agreements with Israeli-based banks(2) Expected Source $50 mm term seller note 4% interest(3) (1) Determined by the average closing price of Delek US common stock as reported on the NYSE for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the closing date (2) Lion Oil will enter into five-year term loan agreements with Israeli banks in the amount of up to $100 million, a portion of which will be used for the purchase of equipment and shares (3) Lion Oil will execute a $50 million term note payable to Ergon that will be guaranteed by Delek US 19

Transaction Sources and Uses Expected Transaction Sources $45 million in restricted shares of Delek US common stock(1) $50 million term note payable by Lion to Ergon (guaranteed by Delek US)(2) $100 million in loans from Israeli banks to Lion(3) $40 million from an affiliate of Delek Group(4) Expected Transaction Uses $145 million for equipment and shares $50 million cash to supplement other working capital financing(5) $40 million to supplement Delek US liquidity position Total Uses = $235 million Total Sources = $235 million (1) Determined by the average closing price of Delek US common stock as reported on the NYSE for the ten consecutive trading days immediately preceding the closing date (2) Six-year note; 4% annual interest rate; annual amortization begins at the end of year two (3) Loan amounts could range from $75 to $100 million (4) Subject to change, contingent on cash flows from operations generated by Delek US (5) Represents the remaining working capital funding requirement not financed through Delek Refining s existing asset-based lending facility and the new inventory supply and off-take arrangement 20

Refining Segment Operational Update

Refining Segment Operational Update Tyler Refinery Update Strong Gulf Coast Refining Economics Persisting in 1Q:11 WTI Discount Benefits Tyler Focused on producing more highvalue specialty products Decline in volumetric loss following recent capital work Lower Capital Spending Requirements Expected In 2011 Gulf Coast refining economics have reached elevated levels in 1Q:11, supported by improved product cracks Spreads between WTI and LLS/Brent/Mars have widened substantially during the first quarter 2011 Producing higher value products such as ULSD, jet fuel aviation gasoline MSAT project improved the feed quality to the platformer which resulted in higher liquid gasoline yields Regulatory spending at Tyler largely complete Anticipate Tyler CAPEX will be ~$25 million in 2011(1) (1) As indicated in the Company latest form 10-K 22

Tyler Refinery Is A Niche, Inland Asset Tyler Refinery Niche, Inland Refiner In PADD III 60,000 barrels per day High ) Conversion, Moderate Complexity 9.4 complexity; equipped with a delayed coking uni t Processes Mostly Light Sweet Crudes Production Sold Into Local Niche Market Primarily local domestic crudes such as WTI and East Texas Crude Generally produces more than 90% light products; sold at rack in Tyler market Tyler Refinery Product Sales (Avg. BPD)(1) 59,161 Tyler Refinery Product Slate (2010)(1) Petrochem 3% Other 4% 53,439 54,405 49,276 46,500 Diesel/Jet 37% Gasoline 56% 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 (1) As of December 31, 2010 23

WTI Priced At A Discount To Competing Crudes Tyler Has Access To Discounted, West Texas Crudes Substantial widening of crude differentials Current cost to purchase WTI is significantly below competing crudes Wider ) differentials benefit refiners processing WTI Cheaper crude lowers the cost of production, benefiting refining margin WTI Is Nearly $15/bbl Cheaper Than LLS Year-To-Date 2011(1) Mars vs WTI Brent vs WTI LLS vs WTI $16.00 $14.00 $12.00 $10.00 $8.00 $6.00 $4.00 $2.00 $0.00 ($2.00) ($4.00) 2008 2009 2010 YTD 2011* (1) Source: Bloomberg; YTD 2011 is thru March 15, 2011 24

WTI Differential to CMA NYMEX WTI Contango Market Structure Favors Tyler WTI Contango Benefit Effectively Reduces Tyler s Cost of Crude Oil Purchase Light, Sweet, Domestic Crudes Tyler historically has purchased mostly WTI an inexpensive local crude Contango ) Lessens Our Cost of Crude Serves as a reduction to our cost of goods; benefi ts refining margin WTI (Contango) Differential To CMA NYMEX(1) $2.00 $1.00 $0.35 $0.81 $0.00 ($1.00) ($2.00) ($3.00) ($0.49) ($0.19) ($1.90) ($1.43) ($0.67) ($1.02) ($1.66) ($0.86) ($1.18) ($0.71) ($1.19) ($4.00) ($3.44) ($5.00) ($4.54) (1) Quarterly contango calculation derived from Argus Media (trade) month average prices 25

Operable Crude Storage Capacity at Cushing Crude Inventories At Cushing Remain Elevated Operable Crude Oil Storage Capacity at Cushing, OK Has Risen In Recent Months(1) 100.0% 95.0% 90.0% 85.0% 80.0% 75.0% 70.0% 65.0% 60.0% Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 (1) Source: EIA; assumes estimated operable storage capacity of 44 mil barrels 26

Contango Benefits The Theoretical Benchmark Building a Theoretical Benchmark Theoretical Benchmark For Tyler High-Sulfur Diesel 5-3-2 Gulf Coast Crack Spread + Contango = Theoretical Margin High-Sulfur Diesel 5-3-2 Gulf Coast Crack Spread, Including Contango Benefit HSD 5-3-2 Gulf Coast Crack Spread 5-3-2 GC CS (+/-) Contango/Backwardation* $25.00 $20.00 $15.00 $10.00 $5.00 $0.00 *Source: WTI Backwardation/Contango data is published and supplied by Argus Media; all crack spread data supplied by Platts **Crack spread data for March 2011 is thru March 15, 2011 27

Refining Benchmark Well Above Historical Levels Improved Benchmark Refining Economics During Early 2011 Strong Refining Economics Entering 2011 Elevated 5-3-2 Gulf Coast Crack Spread In January and February Crack Spread (per bbl) Reached Multi-Year High During January and February 2011(1) $25.00 $20.00 $15.00 More than $6/bbl Above 4-Yr Trailing Average in January More than $10/bbl Above 4-Yr Trailing Average In February $10.00 $5.00 $0.00 January (2007) January (2008) January (2009) January (2010) January (2011) February (2007) February (2008) February (2009) February (2010) February (2011) (1) Source: Platts; references the High Sulfur Diesel 5-3-2 Gulf Coast Crack Spread 28

Recent Investments Lowered Volumetric Loss(1) Creating More High-Value Product Helps Realizations MSAT II Project Improves Liquid Yield More gasoline yield; less conversion of liquids (naphtha) to fuel the refinery Lower Volumetric Loss Partially Due to MSAT II Project 3.2% 2.7% 2.7% 2.0% 2.0% 1.5% 0.5% FY07 FY08 FY09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 (1) Volumetric loss calculation = (Total Throughputs Total Production) / Total Throughputs 29

Retail Segment Operational Update

Retail Segment Operational Update Six Consecutive Quarters of Same-Store Merchandise Sales Growth Thru 4Q:10 Higher Crude Prices Generally Impact Demand, Fuel Margins Food Service Initiative Gaining Momentum Private Label Initiative A Key Margin Driver Store Reimaging Program Successful Remains a Key Focus in 2011 Multi-Year New Store Construction Program Begins In 2011(1) Same-store merchandise benefitting from new product offerings and food service Saw some demand degradation in 4Q:10 due to higher crude (and fuel) prices; higher crude costs impacts margin Adding Quick Service Restaurant concepts to locations positioning MAPCO as a fresh food destination point Many new private label SKUs generate higher average gross profit margin Focused on enhancing the look/feel and branding of older locations to attract broader demographic Intend to build 10-20 stores per year during the next five years in both existing and new markets (1) As indicated on the Company s Fourth Quarter 2010 Earnings Conference Call 31

Cyclical Recovery In Same-Store Sales Key Factors Affecting Same-Store Sales Same-Store Merchandise Sales Relevant Factors: Location, size, appeal, offering, affordability, people Same-Store ) Gallons Sold Relevant Factors: Commodity prices, weather, supp ly disruptions Same-Store Merchandise Sales 5.0% 4.6% 6.3% 4.4% 1.8% 1.2% -1.4% 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 Same-Store Fuel Gallons Sold 4.2% 3.4% 5.2% 1.0% -0.8% -0.3% -0.8% 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 32

Retention of High-Quality Assets Improves Results Retaining High-Quality, Top-Performing Assets Multi-Year Recovery Underway Merchandise & fuel gallons sales per average number of stores increased in 2010 Shed ) Underperforming Assets Divested underperforming assets in the 2008-2010 timeframe Merchandise Sales Per Average Number of Stores (In The Period) $897,430 $829,550 $840,087 2008 2009 2010 Retail Fuel Gallons Sold Per Average Number of Stores (In The Period) 989,507 932,901 945,880 2008 2009 2010 33

Fresh Food Service Initiative Performing Well Opportunity To Grow Inside Sales and Margins Food Service as a Destination Point Redefining the utility of the neighborhood convenience store Food ) Service as a Margin Driver Food service margins exceed the trailing corporate merchandise margin average Same-Store Sales of Food Service 24.0% 18.5% 14.3% 9.2% 2.5% -8.0% -16.2% 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 34

Gross Margin (%) Private Label Initiative Making Progress Private Label A Value Offering That Generates Above Average Margins Quality, Affordable Replacement Option Higher margin, lower-cost option for consumers Countermeasure ) To Channel Blur Private label is an effective way of offering valu e to time-starved consumers Private Label vs. Branded Products(1) Private Label as % of Merchandise Sales(2) Private Label Branded 80% 10.0% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 2.4% 3.8% 0% Single Serve Water Energy Drinks Iced Tea Juice Drinks Sport Drinks Potato Chips 4Q:09 4Q:10 Long-Term Target (1) Margin does not include rebates and other promotional subsidies from vendors (2) Same-store sales of private label products as a percentage of total same-store merchandise sales; excludes lottery and services 35

Total Number of Stores (End of Period) Total Remodeled Stores as % of Total Number of Stores Store Reimaging & New Construction Initiatives Elevate MAPCO Brand Through Store Remodeling and New Construction Multi-Year Store Enhancement Initiative 31% of store base reimaged or newly constructed as of 12/31/10 Five-Year ) New Store Construction Plan Construct 10-20 new stores per annum in the 2011-2015 timeframe(1) Accelerating ) Store Reimaging Plan Reimaging at least 25 sites in 2011 Expanding ) Market Footprint Expanding into new markets in the Midwest and Sout heastern U.S. Multi-Year Remodeling & Construction Initiative Total Number of Stores (End of Period)(2) Reimages/Prototypes as % of Total Store Base 600 500 400 300 200 100 40% 30% 20% 10% 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 0% (1) As indicated on the Company s Fourth Quarter 2010 Earnings Conference Call (2) As of Dec. 31, 2010 36

Favorable Impact From Store Reimaging Strong Economic Case Favoring Store Reimaging Investment Newer, Cleaner Stores Draw Customers Reshaping the retail brand identity to attract a broader demographic More ) Conducive To Fresh Offerings Atmosphere matters, especially when you are sellin g food and produce Reimaged Store Outperformance Same-Store Fuel Gallons Sold (Full-Year 2010) Same-Store Merchandise Sales (Full-Year 2010) 3.5% 6.5% 4.3% 1.8% Legacy Store Base (412 Stores) 70 Reimaged Stores Open More Than One Year Legacy Store Base (412 Stores) 70 Reimaged Stores Open More Than One Year 37

Marketing Segment Operational Update

Marketing Segment Operational Update Wholesale Marketing In West Texas Product Marketing Terminals Owned (San Angelo, Abilene, Tyler); Third-Party (Aledo, Odessa, Big Springs, Frost) Supply ) Synergies With Tyler Owned and leased pipelines transport crude to Tyle r refinery Consistent ) Contribution Margin Positive contribution margin every quarter since 2 006 Minimal ) CAPEX requirements Annual CAPEX less than $1 million per year 2006-2010 16,557 Total Sales Volumes (BPD) 13,378 14,354 Consistent Contribution Margin ($MM) $24.8 $23.3 $23.7 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 39

Appendix Additional Data

Historical and Projected Capital Spending(1) 2010 (Actual) 2011 (Estimate) $74.3 $56.8 $42.3 $49.2 $25.1 $14.4 Refining Segment Retail Segment Total (1) As indicated in the 10-K dated March 11, 2011; excludes any impact from the Lion Oil Transaction; 2010 spending includes $0.1 million of other capital spending 41