State of the Industry

Similar documents
RAS PROJECTS THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY. Ryan Barborak, P.E. CST Flexible Pavements Branch

2018 Local Roads Workshop Local Agency Warranties

Final Estimates Level 2

Fort Worth s Experience with the Use of SBR Latex in Hot Mix

PROPOSAL BITUMINOUS ASPHALT CONCRETE NON-CAPITAL PROJECTS PAVING

Alternate Bids Comparison For the January 26, 2007 Bid Opening

City of Dallas Infrastructure Management Plan

Maintenance Funding & Investment Decisions STACEY GLASS, P.E. STATE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Appendix B Example Project Designs and Engineers Opinion of Costs

Florida Department of Transportation INITIAL TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

FORMAL BID KITSAP COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ER&R DIVISION HOT MIX ASPHALT FOR 2018

C ITY OF S OUTH E UCLID

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

Including Maintenance & Rehabilitation Schedules

Influence of Recycled Asphalt Shingles (RAS) on Fatigue Properties of Asphalt Pavements. Andrew Cascione & Dr. Christopher Williams

Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR MATERIALS & WORKMANSHIP PAVEMENT WARRANTY (NEW/RECONSTRUCTED HOT MIX ASPHALT PAVEMENT)

INVITATION TO BID. CONTRACT PERIOD: The contract shall cover the County s needs for the period of July 21, 2015 through July 20, 2015.

Transition from Manual to Automated Pavement Distress Data Collection and Performance Modelling in the Pavement Management System

Region 5 Upcoming Projects for Summer/Fall 2018

Gladwin County Road Commission 2016 Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Paving. Page 1 of 5

Including Maintenance & Rehabilitation Schedules

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE WARRANTY. CFS:EMC 1 of 7 APPR:KPK:DBP: FHWA:APPR:

REQUEST FOR QUOTATION SUBMIT BID TO PURCHASING DIVISION SHAWNEE COUNTY COURTHOUSE Room 201 Topeka, Kansas THIS IS NOT AN ORDER

Prepared by: The Florida Department of Transportation Office of the Comptroller General Accounting Office

2016 PAVEMENT CONDITION ANNUAL REPORT

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan - Needs Assessment: System Preservation Pavement, Bridges, and Transit Costs and Benefits

Residential Street Improvement Plan

Public Works Maintenance STORMWATER AND

GLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.

UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM

Railroad-DOT Mitigation Strategies (R16) Resurfacing Agreements

NOTICE OF VARIOUS BID RENEWALS

Performance Measures for Making Pavement Preservation Decisions. David Luhr Pavement Management Engineer Washington State DOT

TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM

SEGREGATION RATING MANUAL

Including Maintenance & Rehabilitation Schedules

APPENDICES APPENDICES

Minnesota Department of Transportation Report to Legislature on Life-Cycle Cost Analyses. January 2013

Highway Engineering-II

Alabama Transportation Conference. February 9 th, 2015

Appendix E: Revenues and Cost Estimates

AGENDA ITEM CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE OCTOBER 18, 2016 BUSINESS ITEMS

Examples of Decision Support Using Pavement Management Data

Pavement Preservation in Hillsborough County, Florida. Roger Cox, P.E. Department of Public Works Transportation Infrastructure Management

COUNTY OF LAMBTON ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2013

Pavement Preservation

Technical Appendix. FDOT 2040 Revenue Forecast

Okaloosa-Walton 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Amendment

APPENDIX FOR THE METROPOLITAN LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Forecast of State and Federal Revenues for Statewide and Metropolitan Plans

Florida s Turnpike Enterprise Tentative Five-Year Work Program - FY 2018/19 thru FY 2022/23 Summary of Projects FDOT District Six

ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITIES UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1a COLD MILLING CLASS 3 (Approx.2") 7,386 S.Y. $ $ 1b COLD MILLING CLASS 3 (Approx 3-

Corridors of Commerce DRAFT Scoring and Prioritization Process. Patrick Weidemann Director of Capital Planning and Programming November 1, 2017

1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS 3

IMPACT FEE CREDIT APPLICATION & GUIDELINES

Legislative Report on Life-Cycle Cost Analyses

City of Newnan, Georgia

REVISED ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO

PROPOSAL FOR MILDRED AVENUE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BEDFORD TOWNSHIP MONROE COUNTY, MICHIGAN

OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY

CURB CUTS SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS

Asset Management Ruminations. T. H. Maze Professor of Civil Engineering Iowa State University

Hosten, Chowdhury, Shekharan, Ayotte, Coggins 1

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

TESTIMONY. The Texas Transportation Challenge. Testimony Before the Study Commission on Transportation Financing

KANE COUNTY DIVISION of TRANSPORTATION

OPTION A: 2 BITUMINOUS PAVING WITH SHOULDERS OPTION B: SCRATCH COURSE BITUMINOUS PAVING WITHOUT SHOULDERS

ROAD COMMISSION FOR IONIA COUNTY

EVALUATION OF EXPENDITURES ON RURAL INTERSTATE PAVEMENTS IN KANSAS

LONG-TERM WARRANTY CONTRACTS RISK OR REWARD?

...;..;...;.;;..;.. Additional preservation and safety needs have been identified and recommend to be programmed with funding available in FY2019.

Exhibit 4 Page 1 of 8

Maricopa County DOT. Transportation Asset Management (TAM) Planning. March 1, 2018 DYE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.

Master Development Plan for the TxDOT North Tarrant Express Project, Segments 2-4. Chapter 6: Preliminary Cost Estimates.

Town Road Improvement Project Plan

Funding Update. House Transportation Subcommittee on Long-Term Infrastructure Planning September 10, 2015, 9:00 A.M. Capitol Extension E2.

I-64 Capacity Improvements Segment III Initial Financial Plan

LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT OF ROAD ASSETS (Emphasis on Long Life Pavements)

Revenue Sharing Program Guidelines

2018 Road Improvements Engineer's Project Number: LK 01 Bid Deadline: May 1, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. local time

Transfer of Federal Gas Tax Revenues Under the New Deal for Cities and Communities. Municipal Funding Agreement Guide.

Revenue Sharing Program Guidelines

CONTRACT TIME DETERMINATION

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

CITY OF PALM DESERT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

APPLICATION & PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. Name of Owner: Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: City: State: Zip:

Florida s Turnpike Enterprise Tentative Five-Year Work Program - FY 2018/19 thru FY 2022/23 Summary of Projects FDOT District One

In addition to embarking on a new dialogue on Ohio s transportation priorities,

ROAD COMMISSION FOR IONIA COUNTY

This page intentionally left blank

Addendum 1 13 TH Street Streetscape. September 1, 2017

Crushed Surfacing Base Course, per ton. Pages 8-8, Special Provisions Section , Materials. This Section is supplemented with the following:

City of Grand Forks Staff Report

COUNTY OF SONOMA AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY REPORT

FINAL REPORT FHWA/IN/JTRP-2004/34 AN EVALUATION OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF WARRANTY CONTRACTS IN INDIANA. Priyanka Singh Graduate Research Assistant

Texas Department of Transportation 1

ALL Counties. ALL Districts

RESURFACING WATER STREET & FALLS LANE

LEGAL NOTICE INVITATION TO SUBMIT PROPOSALS

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. Meadow Wood Commons. City, State

Transcription:

Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION State of the Industry Howie Moseley State Bituminous Materials Engineer

State Highway System 43,920 lane miles of roadway 8,242 interstate lane miles 33,465 arterial lane miles 2,213 turnpike lane miles 42,858 lane miles are asphalt (97.6%) 1,062 lane miles are PCC (2.4%)

Asphalt Producers for Florida In-State Out-of- State Asphalt Plants 93 2 Asphalt Contractors 43 2 Asphalt Binder Terminals 12 5 Asphalt Rubber Terminals 2 3 GTR Suppliers 2 3

FDOT Asphalt Tonnage (FY 16/17) Friction Structural FC-5 FC-12.5 FC-9.5 FC-4.75 SP 19.0 SP 12.5 SP 9.5 SP 4.75 Totals 486,125 575,441 292,743 12,986 65,493 3,089,971 141,778 2,016 4,666,553 3.30 million tons of structural course and base. 1.37 million tons of friction course. 15.5 million tons of asphalt mix produced in Florida in 2016 (public and private work).

Historical FDOT Asphalt Tonnage

Asphalt Tonnage By District (FY 16/17)

Asphalt Tonnage By Producer (FY 16/17)

Asphalt Tonnage By Producer (FY 16/17)

Mix Tonnage By Binder Type (FY 16/17)

Binder Tonnage (FY 16/17)

RAP Usage - 625,000 Tons of RAP - 35,000 Tons of Binder from RAP - 590,000 Tons of Aggregate from RAP

RAP Data Condition FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 Unrestricted (No max limit) Average 25% 26% 25% 29% 24% 29% 27% Maximum 40% 38% 39% 45% 50% 50% 50% FDOT restricted (Max 20%) Average 17% 18% 16% 19% 20% 20% 19% Maximum 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%

Costs

Asphalt Mix Cost

Asphalt Mix Weighted Average Cost

Asphalt Binder Cost

Asphalt Price Index

Pay Factor Data

Composite Pay Factor (CPF) Data Statewide Average CPF FY 16/17: 1.013 FY 15/16: 1.009 FY 14/15: 1.018 FY 13/14: 1.019 FY 12/13: 1.011 FY 11/12: 1.015

Composite Pay Factor (CPF) Data Dense Graded Pay Factor Data Density AC Air Voids #8 Sieve #200 Sieve CPF 0.992 1.031 1.024 0.997 1.025 1.013 Open Graded Pay Factor Data AC 3/8 Sieve #4 Sieve #8 Sieve CPF 1.011 1.012 1.015 1.018 1.014

Top Producer CPF (>100,000 tons) FY 16/17: DAB (1.033) FY 15/16: DAB (1.019) FY 14/15: Atlantic Coast Asphalt (1.032) FY 13/14: DAB (1.037) FY 12/13: DAB (1.040) FY 11/12: APAC (1.037)

Top Producer CPF (25,000 to 100,000 tons) FY 16/17: Superior Asphalt (1.042) FY 15/16: Whitehurst (1.036) FY 14/15: Roads Inc. (1.042) FY 13/14: JW Cheatham (1.046) FY 12/13: Asphalt Group (1.037) FY 11/12: Peavy & Sons (1.037)

Smoothness Data

2011-2017 Laser Acceptance Projects Average IRI (inch/mile)* Year No MTV Used MTV Used No. Projects 2011 55 48 59 2012 59 50 74 2013 55 44 77 2014 65 47 52 2015 62 46 86 2016 58 49 94 2017-48 43 2011-2017 59 47 485 * Weighted per project

Pavement Performance

Statewide Pavement Performance Deficient Pavements (%) Criteria 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Overall 16.5 16.5 14.4 12.4 11.1 9.4 8.4 7.3 7.7 8.5 8.2 Ride 3.5 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.0 1.3 1.2 Crack 14.6 14.9 13.0 10.9 9.7 7.9 6.8 6.0 6.4 7.3 7.1 Rut 0.9 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2

% of SHS Deficient Historical Statewide Performance 28% 26% 24% 22% 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% Crack Ride Rut 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% PCS Year

% of SHS Deficient District 1 Historical Performance 28% 26% 24% 22% 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% Crack Ride Rut 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% PCS Year

% of SHS Deficient District 2 Historical Performance 28% 26% 24% 22% 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% Crack Ride Rut 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% PCS Year

% of SHS Deficient District 3 Historical Performance 28% 26% 24% 22% 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% Crack Ride Rut 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% PCS Year

% of SHS Deficient District 4 Historical Performance 28% 26% 24% 22% 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% Crack Ride Rut 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% PCS Year

% of SHS Deficient District 5 Historical Performance 28% 26% 24% 22% 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% Crack Ride Rut 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% PCS Year

% of SHS Deficient District 6 Historical Performance 28% 26% 24% 22% 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% Crack Ride Rut 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% PCS Year

% of SHS Deficient District 7 Historical Performance 28% 26% 24% 22% 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% Crack Ride Rut 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% PCS Year

% of SHS Deficient Turnpike Historical Performance 28% 26% 24% 22% 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% Crack Ride Rut 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% PCS Year

Statewide Pavement Performance 100.0% Percent of State Highway System Meeting Standards 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Resurfacing Program Statutory Requirement Ensure 80% of pavement on the State Highway System meets Department standards. Internal Objective Ensure 90% of interstates and the turnpike meet Department standards. Resurface enough lane miles annually to maintain these two requirements.

Work Program

Work Program

Asphalt Stuff You Don t See Everyday

Bridge Resurfacing Dames Point Bridge in Jacksonville

Windrow Paving

FC-4.75

High Polymer Project in Midway - Performing well with no significant rutting. - Rutting was in excess of 2.5.

HVS x 2

Construction Career Days

The Balmoral Group Survey Strategic Resource Evaluation Study Survey was emailed on 11/8/17 It will be resent today Sent to the plant contact listed in MAC Results are only reported in the aggregate Please take the time to send it in Results are provided upon request

Hot Item Update FC-5 Usage No longer in curb and gutter areas Not required on ramps Silica Rule / Pavement Bond Segregation High Polymer Binder Usage Additional guidance provided Coordinated with SMO

Recent Specification Changes

January 2017 Workbook Section 334 Superpave Asphalt Concrete. Mix design traffic levels have been consolidated to three levels; A s and B s are the same and D s and E s are the same. Substitutions one level higher still allowed, if the contractor desires.

January 2017 Workbook Section 916 Bituminous Materials. PG 76-22 (PMA) and PG 76-22 (ARB) are considered equivalents and will be the contractor s choice. For projects let prior to January 2017, contractor can switch if desired. Provide $4.50/ton credit to the Department. The use of waste oil (not REOBs) is prohibited in the modification of any PG binder grade.

July 2017 Workbook Section 234 Superpave Asphalt Base The Contractor may use a Type SP-12.5 mixture (Traffic Level B, C, D, or E), in lieu of a Type B-12.5. High Polymer binder replaces PG 82-22 (PMA).

January 2018 Workbook Section 334 Superpave Asphalt Concrete. Definition of warm mix added: For unmodified mixtures: Mixing temperature 285 F. For modified mixtures: Mixing temperature 305 F. Change in length for non-density areas from 1000 to 500. Density testing for acceptance will not be performed on the following areas when they are less than 500 feet (continuous) in length: turning lanes, acceleration lanes, deceleration lanes, shoulders, parallel parking lanes or ramps.

January 2018 Workbook Section 334 Superpave Asphalt Concrete. The following clarification added: Do not perform density testing for acceptance in a sublot if the plant random sample for that sublot has not been obtained.

Active Contracted Research Projects Impact of Recycled Asphalt Shingles (RAS) on Asphalt Binder Performance Evaluation of Reflective Cracking Mitigation Treatments Using the CSIC Test High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Asphalt Mixes for Low Volume Roads Best Practices for Construction and Repair of Bridge Approaches and Departures Evaluation of FC-5 with High Polymer Binder to Reduce Raveling

Active Contracted Research Projects Determine the Structural Coefficient for Asphalt Mixes Containing High Polymer Binder Enhanced Characterization of RAP for Cracking Performance Evaluation of Roadway Worms/Distortions Study of the Potential Benefits of Anti-Strip Additives on Granite Based FC-5 Asphalt Mixtures

Active Contracted Research Projects Development of a Procedure for Evaluating and Approving Liquid Anti-Strip Agents Evaluation of the Cracking Performance of Asphalt Binders at Intermediate Temperatures

My Contact Information

Thank You