Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study

Similar documents
TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012)

Market and Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Phase 2 Metrorail Extension to Loudoun County. Loudoun County April 19, 2011

Fixed Guideway Transit Overview

CENTRAL CITY LINE PROJECT UPDATE AND SMALL STARTS EVALUATION & RATINGS APPLICATION UPDATED & REVISED 4/20/17

UNDERSTANDING THE FISCAL IMPACTS OF TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) PROJECTS IN NORTHERN VIRGINIA AND MARYLAND

METRO. Metro Funding. Associated Master Plan: Comprehensive Master Transportation Plan (MTP) for Arlington. Neighborhood(s):

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IN THE PORTLAND METRO REGION

University Link LRT Extension

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview: State Fiscal Year

Public Transit: The Funding Crisis and A Need for Action

Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan

Arlington County, Virginia

Appendix A REAL ESTATE MARKET DEMAND ESTIMATE METHODOLOGY

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

DRAFT REGIONAL TRANSIT SYSTEM PLAN Regional Task Force July 8, 2011

Travel Forecasting for Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Total Operating Activities for FY17 are $56.9 million, an increase of $5.1M or 9.8% from FY16.

INVEST IN TRANSIT. The Regional Transit Strategic Plan for Chicago and Northeastern Illinois ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT FEBRUARY 2019

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 21, 2013

VALLEY METRO RAIL FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Northern Virginia Transportation Commission: 2018 Legislative and Policy Agenda

Draft TransAction Plan: Overview and Findings. Martin E. Nohe, Chairman July 13, 2017

2040 Transit System Plan

READINESS REVIEW ENTRY INTO PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. Columbia Pike Streetcar Arlington County, Virginia FTA Region 3

Round 6.4 Cooperative Forecasts of Population, Households, Housing Units and Employment

Executive Summary - Fiscal Year 2016 Valley Metro Rail Preliminary Annual Operating and Capital Budget

CHAPTER 7: Financial Plan

NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM

Mobility Plans and Fees: The Future of Transportation Funding

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Subdivision Staging Policy (SSP) By Dan Wilhelm, As of 11/15/2016

Contents. Appendix. Cost Model Structure. Tables

Our Mission: To provide critical transportation infrastructure to enhance the community s long-term economic and environmental sustainability.

A New Tool for Tracking Home and Rental Values in TODs

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 15, Receive the County Manager s Budget Forecast for Fiscal Year 2018.

SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FISCAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

The Value of Metrorail and Virginia Railway Express to the Commonwealth of Virginia

Board Guidance and Notes to Accompany FY 2018 Adopted Budget

Chapter 9 Financial Considerations. 9.1 Introduction

Review of FasTracks Status and Future Strategic Direction

Overview of the Final New Starts / Small Starts Regulation and Frequently Asked Questions

Funding Local Public Transportation

Amend FY07 System Access Program for Artwork

STAFF REPORT Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) Scenario Performance Update for Board Direction

Columbia River Crossing Project Vancouver, Washington Engineering (Rating Assigned November 2012)

Peer Agency: King County Metro

D R A F T M E M O R A N D U M

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

MOTION NO. M Agreement with the City of Seattle and King County Metro for Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel Mitigation

Regional Transportation District FasTracks Financial Plan. April 22,

REVISED AGENDA Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors

Planning Board Worksession No.1-Transportation and Staging

The Case Not Made: Local Bus-Rapid-Transit (BRT) and the Independent Transit Authority (ITA)

National Conference of State Legislatures

Developing with Jobs per Household equal to 1.6

This report has been prepared in conjunction with the CEO of the TTC.

Business Survey Report

INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING

Today s agenda. Itasca Project introduction Transit ROI objectives Results of analysis Comments from business leaders Conclusion

This chapter describes the initial financial analysis and planning for the construction and operations of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA).

Intercity Transit Community Update

How Can We Reduce Poverty When It s Spreading Out? Reducing Poverty By Reducing Transportation Burden

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

March 11, RE: Docket No. FTA Dear Docket Clerk:

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

Cincinnati Streetcar: Options & Recommendations for Funding Operations

Acknowledgments. Special thanks to public- and private-sector financial contributors: Arapahoe County. City of Arvada.

Mass Transit Return on Investment

Loudoun 2040 Fiscal Impact Analysis Report Loudoun County, Virginia

Our Mission: To provide critical transportation infrastructure to enhance the community s long-term economic and environmental sustainability.

2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Phase II: Funding Scenarios. Public Opinion Research: Focus Groups. Conducted November 14-17, 2011

Last year, transit spent almost $1.1 billion on materials and services contracts with more than 2,000 Pennsylvania businesses.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

APPROVE INCREASE TO L1FE-OF-PROJECT BUDGET

A Framework to Identify Economic and Community Benefits of the Proposed BRT System in Southeast Michigan

FUND DESCRIPTIONS FY 2015 PROPOSED BUDGET SUMMARY

bg 2017 lacmta. Metro

8.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

FY17 FY16 Valley Metro RPTA Sources of Funds FY17 vs FY16

Metro 2025 Alternative Funding and Financing

Metropolitan Council 2013 Operating Budget and Capital Program

SERVICE DELIVERY & GOVERNMENTAL TRANSPARENCY Infrastructure & Operational Enhancements

DRCOG is local officials working together to address the region's challenges for today and tomorrow. Metro Vision 2040

2.0 PROJECT FINANCIAL PLAN...

JP Morgan Public Finance Transportation Utility Conference

Regional Transit System Return on Investment Assessment. November 30, 2012

Economic Impact Analysis of the Downtown Green Line Vision Plan and Georgia Multi-modal Passenger Terminal

Public Transit Services Summary of Submitted 2015 Budget From Rates

The DRAFT Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

Finance & Administration Committee Information Item IV-A October 9, 2014 Momentum Update

Memorandum. Summary. Revenue

Review FY09 Subsidy Allocation

Approval of Proposed FY 2019 Annual Budget and 20-Year Financial Plan

4.3 Economic and Fiscal Impacts

SEPTEMBER 2017 EMPLOYMENT HOUSING REAL ESTATE TRANSIT & TOURISM

Fiscal Analysis of the City of Palo Alto 2030 Comprehensive Plan

MEMORANDUM. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors. Michael T. Burns General Manager. DATE: August 4, 2008

Transcription:

Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study Presentation to the Arlington County Housing Commission May 1, 2014

Arlington County retained HR&A to update the 2012 Return on Investment Study by evaluating the net benefits of enhanced bus versus streetcar service. HR&A analyzed the projected impact of enhanced bus versus streetcar service with regards to: Real estate value appreciation Quantity and timing of new real estate development Form of new development and impact on place-making Employment growth Tax revenue growth HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 2

HR&A estimated impacts to properties within ¼ mile of the alignment along Columbia Pike, in Pentagon City, and in Baileys Crossroads, over 30-years. Study Area HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 3

The characteristics of the transit investments analyzed were defined by the AA/EA with direction from Arlington County and its transportation consultants. Because an agreement with VDOT stipulates that travel lanes cannot be removed from Columbia Pike, transit requiring a dedicated lane such as light rail transit (LRT) or bus rapid transit (BRT) is infeasible. The enhanced bus system considered by this analysis largely corresponds to the TSM 2 alternative defined by the AA/EA report. The streetcar system considered by this analysis largely corresponds to the Skyline Central Plaza design alternative defined by the AA/EA report. HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 4

HR&A found that streetcar will accelerate delivery of adopted plans, enhance regional competitiveness, and yield greater economic benefits. Implementing a streetcar service along the Columbia Pike corridor is expected to generate $2.2-$3.0 billion in net economic benefits over 30 years 4,600 incremental new jobs 10 years after construction $315-$620 million in incremental local tax revenues over 30 years $40-$75 million in incremental revenues for the Columbia Pike TIF over 30 years over what would be generated by an enhanced bus. HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 5

HR&A employed a rigorous methodology incorporating evidence from national precedents and conditions particular to the Columbia Pike corridor. Evaluate transportation characteristics Analyzed current Columbia Pike corridor real estate market conditions Analyzed actual real estate impacts of existing transit systems Assessed local developer and retailer perceptions Synthesized findings to build model of streetcar and enhanced bus impacts HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 6

Past experience strongly suggests streetcar and similar rail modes more consistently generate real estate benefits than enhanced bus service. Study ITDP: More Development for Your Transit Dollar New Real Estate Mantra: Location Near Public Transportation Capturing the Value of Transit Land Use Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit: Pittsburgh MLK East Busway Land Use Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit: Boston Silver Line Capitalization of BRT Network Expansions Effects Value Capture and TIF Options for Streetcar Construction Portland Streetcar Development Impacts TCRP Synthesis 86: Relationships between Streetcars and Built Environment The Impact of TOD on Housing Prices in San Diego Charlotte Streetcar Economic Development Study Land Value Impacts of Rail Transit Services in San Diego An Assessment of the DART LRT on Taxable Property Valuations Land Development at Selected HBLR Stations The Impact of HBLR on Residential Property Appreciation The Hiawatha Line: Impacts on Land Use and Housing Value Enhanced Bus/BRT Streetcar Light Rail Strong Price Premium Pace / Quantity Increase Strong Price Premium Pace / Quantity Increase Strong Price Premium Pace / Quantity Increase HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 7

In Portland and in New Jersey, streetcar (and streetcar-like) transit catalyzed dramatic neighborhood transformations through transit-oriented development. Portland Streetcar $4.5 Billion in new transit-oriented development catalyzed Adjacent development uses 90% of FAR (vs. 43% more than 3 blocks away) Property within 3 blocks achieved 40% premium over City after 11 yrs Hudson Bergen Light Rail $5.3 Billion in new transit-oriented residential development catalyzed Property within ¼ mile of station areas appreciated at 17-20% greater annually than other property over 18 yrs Boston Washington Street Silver Line $650 Million in new development, but primarily Downtown near subway 8% premium for adjacent properties over those 0.16 miles away, but no corridor value premium relative to City achieved within 9 yrs Kansas City MAX $5.2 Billion in new development, but primarily in Downtown and not oriented towards alignment City now implementing streetcar to encourage more TOD HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 8

Most developers and retailers believed a streetcar system would confer greater advantages to the Columbia Pike transit corridor than an enhanced bus system. Developer Findings Most believed a streetcar would confer greater advantages to real estate dynamics than an enhanced bus A smaller number believed a streetcar would not have a greater impact than an enhanced bus, and that it may be unlikely for either to be impactful Almost all believed connecting to the Crystal City Streetcar would amplify the impacts of streetcar Retailer Findings Most are more likely to consider expanding along the corridor with a streetcar versus an enhanced bus Most believed streetcar presents distinct advantages to branding, placemaking, and wayfinding HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 9

Streetcar would ultimately do more to differentiate the Columbia Pike transit corridor in the region through its superior mobility effects. Enhanced Bus Streetcar Quality of rider Improved over existing Smoother and quieter than experience buses, but overcapacity bus; not overcapacity Crystal City Streetcar Crystal City Streetcar (oneseat Connections (transfer), bus system, and Pentagon City Metro ride), bus system, and Pentagon City Metro Corridor travel time 23 minutes 22 minutes Vehicle capacity 94 riders 155 riders Initial ridership w/ Crystal City 11,800 15,900 Streetcar connection 2035 network volume to capacity ratio 1.19 (Indicates overcapacity) 0.91 (Indicates under capacity) HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 10

and also through its greater amenity effects. Place-making function Infrastructure permanence Branding / differentiation effects Impact on corridor congestion Enhanced Bus Vehicle, station infrastructure, and signage Stations Less unique positioning offers less brand value Lesser congestion reduction based on model ridership and capacity Streetcar Vehicle, tracks, wires, station infrastructure, signage Vehicles, stations, tracks, and wires Modern positioning offers cache and brand value Greater congestion reduction based on model ridership and capacity HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 11

Based on these findings, HR&A projected that streetcar will catalyze more significant property value premiums versus enhanced bus. Residential / Office Enhanced Bus Retail Residential / Office Streetcar Retail Initial Premium over Baseline Premium over Baseline After 10-Years 2% 1% 6% 4% 4% 2% 10% 7% HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 12

Substantial development potential remains along the Columbia Pike Corridor. Incremental Growth Required for Corridor Build Out Residential Units Office Square Feet Retail Square Feet Pentagon City 3,100 2,580,000 85,000 Columbia Pike 13,500 570,000 210,000 Baileys Crossroads 3,500 1,745,000 260,000 Total 20,100 4,895,000 555,000 HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 13

HR&A projected that both enhanced bus and streetcar would support corridor development, but streetcar will do more and faster. Percent of Remaining Build-Out Achieved Within 30 Years Under Baseline Under Enhanced Bus Under Streetcar Pentagon City 100% 100% 100% Columbia Pike 60% 65% 80% Baileys Crossroads 25% 35% 50% Total 58% 64% 75% HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 14

HR&A estimated that streetcar would generate 2,800 more housing units, 70,000 more sq. ft. of retail, and 360,000 more sq. ft. of office than enhanced bus. Total New Real Estate Delivery Over 30 Years Under Baseline Under Enhanced Bus Under Streetcar Residential (units) 11,400 12,600 15,400 Retail (sq. ft.) 260,000 300,000 370,000 Office (sq. ft.) 3,410,000 3,610,000 3,970,000 HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 15

The return-on-investment study utilized the best available cost estimates for both the enhanced bus and streetcar systems. One-Time Capital Costs (Millions of $2014) Annual Operations and Maintenance Costs (Millions of $2014) Baseline Enhanced Bus Streetcar $0 $67 $284 $15.7 $21.2 $24.5 Capital cost estimates for both the enhanced bus service and streetcar service were increased above the estimates in the AA/EA Report to reflect new information. The capital cost estimate of the enhanced bus service increased by $15M, and the capital cost estimate of the streetcar service increased by $31M. HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 16

Over 30 years, HR&A projects that streetcar would generate $2.2-$3.0 billion in greater real estate impacts than enhanced bus service. Net Incremental Benefits (Return on Investment) Over 30 Years 3% Discount Rate 7% Discount Rate $1.4 B $1.0 B $3.2 B $4.4 B Enhanced Bus Streetcar Economic benefits result from the appreciation of existing properties and greater extent and faster pace of new development. HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 17

Within ten years of project construction, streetcar service would catalyze real estate development enabling significantly more local jobs than enhance bus. Incremental New Jobs Supported by 2027 Total Jobs 2,000 6,600 Enhanced Bus Streetcar Development on the Columbia Pike induced by new transit creates accessible employment opportunities for County residents. HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 18

Streetcar would also generate up to $620 million in additional tax revenues to Arlington and Fairfax Counties relative to enhanced bus. Incremental Local Tax Revenues Over 30 Years 3% Discount Rate $275 M $895 M 7% Discount Rate $140 M $455 M Enhanced Bus Streetcar Fiscal benefits owe to real estate, personal property, business license (BPOL), sales, and meals tax revenues to Arlington and Fairfax Counties. HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 19

With the streetcar, the Columbia Pike TIF could generate an additional $55-105 million to the Transit-Oriented Affordable Housing (TOAH) fund over 30 years. Incremental TIF Revenues Over 30 Years 3% Discount Rate $30 M $105 M 7% Discount Rate $15 M $55 M Enhanced Bus Streetcar The TIF dedicates one quarter of the incremental real property tax revenue derived from Columbia Pike to fund the TOAH. HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 20

A streetcar service would ultimately be more effective in meeting development goals for Columbia Pike, Pentagon City, and Baileys Crossroads. Arlington County s Columbia Pike Initiative and Columbia Pike Neighborhoods Area Plan envision a vibrant and livable corridor with affordable housing, increased density, and enhanced public facilities. Fairfax County s Comprehensive Plan envisions Baileys Crossroads as a denser area featuring mixed uses and new amenities These plans expect the Columbia Pike corridor to accommodate a larger share of future regional growth. Attractive infrastructure improvements like streetcar make the corridor more competitive in capturing demand in the Capital region market. HR&A Advisors, Inc. INTERNAL DRAFT Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study 21

Columbia Pike Transit Initiative: Comparative Return on Investment Study Presentation to the Arlington County Housing Commission May 1, 2014