CHAPTER IV DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Similar documents
CHAPTER 5 REVENUE REQUIREMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN AND RAMON GONZALES ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER VII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PATRICK MOERSEN (OVERHEADS) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN (WORKING CASH) APRIL 6, 2018

CHAPTER V PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UPDATED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF S. NASIM AHMED SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RYAN HOM (UPDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS REPORT) January 2018

CHAPTER X DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MARJORIE SCHMIDT-PINES (RATES) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER XII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SHARIM CHAUDHURY ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER III COST TRACKING & REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOHNNY M. HULEIS

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KHAI NGUYEN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAWAAD A. MALIK (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES)

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY LENART ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-46-R REVISED SOCALGAS

REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARY G. LENART (REVENUES AT PRESENT AND PROPOSED RATES) March 2015

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE RATE BASE. November 2014

THIRD REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) July 31, 2018

SECOND REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF IFTEKHARUL (SHARIM) CHAUDHURY (PRESENT AND PROPOSED GAS TRANSPORTATION REVENUE AND RATES) April 6, 2018

CHAPTER III PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF EDWARD J. REYES

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH MOCK SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER VIII DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NEIL CAYABYAB (INSURANCE) ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

CHAPTER 4 COST RECOVERY AND REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER VII SOCALGAS AMI BUSINESS CASE MODELING METHODOLOGY AND REVENUE REQUIREMENT

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN B. ATUN CHAPTER 4 ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. DEREMER (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

REVISED SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. VAN DER LEEDEN POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING. March 2015

PREPARED SUPPLEMENTAL TESTIMONY OF SIM-CHENG FUNG SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) November 2014

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER III COST TRACKING AND REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF AMANDA D. WHITE SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RANDALL G. ROSE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

CHAPTER X DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NEIL CAYABYAB ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

January 12, 2017 Advice Letter 5070

CHAPTER 13 AMI FINANCIAL MODELING. JULY 14, 2006, AMENDMENT Prepared Supplemental, Consolidating, Superseding and Replacement Testimony of SCOTT KYLE

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Conceptually what specific costs should the compression rate adder recover?

Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) October 6, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

REVISED WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD M. VAN DER LEEDEN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Testimony of Stephen E. Pickett

REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF HUGO MEJIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF SCOTT R. WILDER ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (PHASE 2)

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF EDWARD J. REYES ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL W. FOSTER ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SDG&E AND SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DIANA DAY

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CYNTHIA S. FANG (ELECTRIC RATES AND BILL COMPARISON) JUNE 18, 2018

REVISED UPDATED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JASON BONNETT SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CHAPTER II NEW CURTAILMENT ORDER PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVE WATSON BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JACK S. LEWIS ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SOCALGAS / SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JAMES VANDERHYE (SHARED SERVICES & SHARED ASSETS BILLING, SEGMENTATION & CAPITAL REASSIGNMENTS)

a. Of materials procured over the last three years, what proportion of the amount spent was for products produced in California? Please explain.

SoCalGas Response 01: a & b. Please refer to the schedule on next page.

TURN DATA REQUEST-082 SDG&E-SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A /8 SDG&E_SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: JULY 12, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: JULY 27, 2018

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL A. BERMEL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER II SUMMARY OF AMI BUSINESS CASE

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SHARIM CHAUDHURY ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (RATE DESIGN)

SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RAGAN G. REEVES (TAXES) April 6, 2018 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO

PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF GARRY G. YEE ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD J CAHILL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

(DATA REQUEST CAL ADVOCATES-DR-033)

2015 General Rate Case

SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF NORMA G. JASSO (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) June 2015

) ) ) ) ) ) ) REVISED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF STEVE WATSON SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF TODD J. CAHILL ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SEMPRA ENERGY Table A

REVISED PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RANDALL G. ROSE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF NORMA G. JASSO (REGULATORY ACCOUNTS) November 2014

TURN DATA REQUEST TURN-SEU GRC A /008 SDG&E/SCG RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: APRIL 5, 2018 DATE RESPONDED: APRIL 27, 2018

SOCALGAS/SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF SHARIM CHAUDHURY (GAS RATES AND BILL COMPARISON & DAILY CORE DEMAND FORECAST GROUP) JUNE 18, 2018

ORA DATA REQUEST NUMBER SCG-DR-ORA-047 A SOCALGAS RESPONSE. Subject: Follow Up to SCG DR-ORA-005 Account 923 Outside Services Request

Subject: Core Pricing Flexibility and Noncore Competitive Load Growth Opportunities Programs

UPDATE TESTIMONY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AUGUST 2018

Company: Southern California Gas Company (U 904 G) Proceeding: 2019 General Rate Case Application: A Exhibit: SCG-37-2R SECOND REVISED

JOINT SETTLEMENT COMPARISON EXHIBIT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY TEST YEAR 2008 GENERAL RATE CASE

SOCALGAS DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHELLE A. SOMERVILLE MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES. November 2014

PUBLIC VERSION WORKPAPERS TO PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

QUESTION 1: 1 Exhibit SCG-04-R, Frank B. Ayala and workpapers in Exhibit SCG-04-CWP-R.

PREPARED REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL R. WOODRUFF ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY CHAPTER 16

ORA DATA REQUEST ORA-SCG-DR-076-PM1 SOCALGAS 2016 GRC A SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: FEBRUARY 20, 2015 DATE RESPONDED: MARCH 9, 2015

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ROBERT C. LANE ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MARK A. DIANCIN SHARED SERVICES AND SHARED ASSETS BILLING POLICIES AND PROCESS. November 2014

INDICATED SHIPPER DATA REQUEST IS-SCG-004 SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: FEBRUARY

SOCALGAS REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CHRISTOPHER R. OLMSTED (INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY) JUNE 18, 2018

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY MELISSA L. OSTROM.

January 29, 2018 Advice Letter 5133-G

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ROBERT M. SCHLAX ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

ORA DATA REQUEST ORA-SCG-062-DAO SOCALGAS 2019 GRC A SOCALGAS RESPONSE DATE RECEIVED: DECEMBER 27, 2017 DATE RESPONDED: JANUARY 19, 2018

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SOCALGAS/SDG&E REBUTTAL TESTIMONY OF CHARLES MANZUK (CASE MANAGEMENT EXHIBIT) JUNE 18, 2018

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

Transcription:

Application No: A.1-0-XXX Exhibit No.: Witness: Karen C. Chan Application of Southern California Gas Company (U 0 G) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 0 G) for (A) Approval of the Forecasted Revenue Requirement Associated with Certain Pipeline Safety Enhancement Plan Projects and Associated Rate Recovery, and (B) Authority to Modify and Create Certain Balancing Accounts Application 1-0- (Filed on March 0, 01) CHAPTER IV DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA March 0, 01

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PURPOSE...1 II. REVENUE REQUIREMENT...1 III. WITNESS QUALIFICATIONS... - i -

I. PURPOSE The purpose of my direct testimony on behalf of Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E) is to present the revenue requirements resulting from the capital and operations and maintenance (O&M) forecasts of the in-scope Pipeline Safety Enhancement Plan (PSEP) Phase 1B and Phase projects. SoCalGas is seeking approval to recover in rates the forecasted revenue requirement of $1.0 million for the period 01 to 00. II. REVENUE REQUIREMENT The revenue requirement associated with the PSEP projects is based on the forecasted 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 incremental capital and O&M costs described in the Prepared Direct Testimony of Ronn Gonzalez (Chapter II). The capital and O&M costs presented in this application include overhead 1, escalation, and other necessary costs to support the investment during construction and over its useful life. A summary of the fully loaded and escalated costs of the in-scope PSEP projects is shown in Table 1, and the illustrative revenue requirement resulting from these fully loaded costs are shown in Table below. The methodology to determine the forecasted revenue requirement involves several steps and considerations. First, the incremental capital and O&M costs are adjusted to include applicable overheads, which are applied to each direct cost input consistent with its classification as company labor, contract labor or purchased services and materials. SoCalGas used December 01 Internal Planning rates for illustrative purposes in this application, however actual overheads will be applied in the determination of the actual revenue requirement for true-up purposes. Next, the overhead-loaded, constant-dollar values for incremental capital and O&M 1 Also referred to as indirect costs. Overhead costs are costs that indirectly support the business operations of SoCalGas and SDG&E and are included for cost recovery. - 1 -

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 costs are escalated for inflation. SoCalGas applied the indices published in IHS Global Insight s rd Quarter 01 Utility Cost Forecast for this application. The revenue requirement calculation assumes all capital costs, including direct costs, overhead, escalation, and Allowance for Funds Used during Construction (AFUDC), are recovered through depreciation over the current authorized book-life of the assets. Consistent with the current ratemaking treatment adopted by the Commission, the forecasted capital costs do not include costs of removal associated with the existing infrastructure; these costs are accounted for in already authorized depreciation rates. In addition to all incremental capital and O&M expenditures, the revenue requirement includes other costs required to support the investment, such as the authorized return on investment, taxes, and franchise fees and uncollectibles. The revenue requirement calculation uses the current authorized rate of return of.0%. Table 1 below summarizes the fully loaded and escalated costs, including capitalized property tax and AFUDC. Table 1 Fully Loaded and Escalated Costs Summary (In Millions of Dollars, Nominal) 01 01 01 0 01 00 01 0 Total Capital 0....0. 0...1 1. O&M - -. 0.. 1. - -.0 Total 0.... 0....1. Table summarizes the forecasted revenue requirement for SoCalGas to test or replace the in-scope PSEP projects. In addition to the fully loaded and escalated costs shown in Table 1, this revenue requirement captures other capital-related costs, such as income taxes and return needed to support the investment over its useful life. SoCalGas rate of return was authorized in the company s 01 Test Year Cost of Capital proceeding in Decision 1-1-0. Additional details may be found in WP-IV--1. Additional details may be found in WP-IV--1. - -

1 1 1 1 1 1 Table Revenue Requirement Summary (In Millions of Dollars, Nominal) 01 0 01 00 01 0 0 0 0 0 0-00 Total Distribution - -.0. 0....... 1.1 Backbone Transmission.1 0.. 1.0 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.. Local Transmission 0. 0.1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.. 1. Total. 0.........0 0. 1.0 As the projects are completed, SoCalGas will calculate and record the actual capital and O&M costs and associated revenue requirement in the approved regulatory accounts. To the extent that actual costs of these Phase 1B projects are incurred and any 0% interim recovery realized in rates prior to the Commission s approval of this application, SoCalGas will reduce the total forecasted revenue requirement presented in this application by the amount recovered under the existing mechanism prior to implementing in customers rates. This approach is reasonable to avoid duplicate rate recovery. In addition, should there be differences between actual and authorized revenue requirements, these differences will be addressed, as needed, in SoCalGas Consolidated Advice Letter Rate Filing for rates effective January 1 of the following year. Further details of the proposed regulatory accounting treatment, including the accounting treatment of Phase 1 costs subject to 0% interim rate recovery under D.1-0-00, are discussed in the Prepared Direct Testimony of Reginald Austria (Chapter V). The details of the illustrated rate impact based on the forecasted revenue requirement are discussed in the Prepared Direct Testimony of Sharim Chaudhury (Chapter VI). - -

III. WITNESS QUALIFICATIONS My name is Karen C. Chan, and I am the Financial and Strategic Analysis Manager for 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 SoCalGas. My business address is West Fifth Street, Los Angeles, California 001-. I received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona in 00 where I graduated summa cum laude. I am a Certified Public Accountant and a Certified Internal Auditor. In my career, my roles have included conducting financial statement and internal controls audits and reviews; conducting fraud interviews and walkthroughs of business cycles; risk assessing financial and operational processes in areas such as inventory management, cash controls, natural gas trading, and capital project management; and I have provided financial expertise for regulatory concepts including revenue requirement, return on rate base, and rate recovery to aid clients with decision making and business case development. I have been employed by SoCalGas in the Financial and Strategic Analysis department since February 01, and am responsible for overseeing the financial analysis and development of revenue requirements in support of new investment opportunities. Prior to joining SoCalGas, I was employed with Sempra Energy where I held positions of increasing responsibility in Audit Services. Prior to Sempra Energy, I was employed by Deloitte & Touche, LLP as an auditor. I have not previously testified before the Commission. This concludes my direct testimony. - -