City of La Verne Cost Allocation Study

Similar documents
CITY OF LOMPOC ENTERPRISE REIMBURSEMENT STUDY. February 19, HF&H Consultants, LLC

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS

Budget in Brief Fiscal Years 2016 and 2017 CITY OF SAN LEANDRO, CALIFORNIA

Year Tax Supported Capital Budget Forecast Investing In Welland

Mountain House Debt. A Synopsis of How Mountain House Is Financed

CITY OF JOPLIN FY 2018 PROPOSED BUDGET

City of Mountlake Terrace. Second Quarter 2016 Financial Report September 19, 2016

FY Annual Budget: Mobility Solutions, Infrastructure, & Sustainability


City of Roseville City Manager Recommended 2017 Budget. July 18, 2016

MEMORANDUM Finance Department

TOWN OF TIBURON ENCROACHMENT PERMIT APPLICATION EP Number:

The City of Springfield groups funds into two broad fund categories: Governmental Funds Proprietary Funds

Statement of Policy. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District s Private Property Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Program.

Finance Department. DATE: August 26, City Council. Director of Finance GANN APPROPRIATION LIMIT RECOMMENDATION:

Manheim Borough 2017/2018 Budget Summary Report

PUBLIC WORKS CIP SUPPORT

MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW FINAL

FORT BEND COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 47

TAUSSIG. Annual Report Fiscal Year City of Irvine Community Facilities District No (Great Park) & Associates, Inc.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA. April 27, 2012

TAUSSIG. Annual Report Fiscal Year City of Irvine Community Facilities District No (Great Park) & Associates, Inc.

Capital Investment Program (CIP) About CIP

Right-of-Way Construction Permit Application

FY 2016 FY 2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary

PW25. REPORT FOR ACTION

BID TABULATION REPORT ABRAM STREET (SH CITY LIMITS) PROJECT No. PWST09016 BID OPENED : April 22, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.

2. Adopt the following factors to be used to calculate the appropriations limit for :

ARTICLE RIGHT-OF-WAY RULES AND REGULATIONS

TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM

FY 2017 FY 2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary

CITY OF ROSEBURG, OREGON TABLE OF CONTENTS ENTERPRISE FUNDS

CITY OF SAN MARCOS ENGINEERING DIVISION

Ten-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)

Capital Improvement Projects

The Three Planning Windows of Asset Management John Murray City of Hamilton May 9 th, 2012 CNAM - Montreal. Hamilton Asset Management Plan

City Fund Types. Special Revenue Funds

Indiana LTAP Road School 2007 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana March 7, 2007

UNINCORPORATED CAPITAL

MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT

CITY OF SAN JACINTO Capital Improvement Program Project Details

IMPLEMENTATION A. INTRODUCTION C H A P T E R

UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapter 1 General Provisions Article 1.1 Introduction

FUND BALANCE STATEMENTS

GASB Statement No. 34. GASB Statement No. 34. GASB Statement No. 34. GASB Statement No. 34. GASB Statement No. 34 the basics

Manheim Borough 2017/2018 Budget Summary Report

NON-MOTORIZED FACILITIES

NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC WORKS

Highlights from the Proposed Budget Fiscal Year

Nith Peninsula, Brant County Fiscal Impact Study

Second Quarter Financial Statements

CITY OF FLORENCE, SC Monthly Financial Report May 2015

TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (T.I.F.)

PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING

The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan

Primary Government Net Assets

City of La Habra Heights. Benefit Assessment Districts. June 6, Presented by Pablo Perez, Director

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY

DRAFT C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN C ITY OF G EORGETOWN, TEXAS S TREETS/ DRAINAGE/AIRPORT F ISCAL Y EAR 201 6

NOTICE OF ELECTION 2021 $10,000, $10,000, $10,000, $10,000,000

City of Mountlake Terrace. Fourth Quarter 2014 Financial Report April 2, 2015

WATER USER RATES & FEE STUDY

Priority Ranking. Timeframe. Faribault County Blue Earth, Bricelyn, Delavan, Easton, Elmore, Frost, Kiester, Minnesota Lake, Walters, Wells, Winnebago

BUDGET WORKSHOP CIP PRESENTATION

FARR WEST CITY Tentative Revised Budget

CITY OF ROSEBURG, OREGON TABLE OF CONTENTS SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS

FLINT HILL MANOR FLINT HILL MANOR. Replacement Reserve Study. Oakton, Virginia. Property Management: Flint Hill Manor Townhouse Association

WATER CHAPTER 8 PIPE INSTALLATION SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS JUNE 2016

GENERAL PROVISIONS I. WORK REQUIREMENTS

Third Quarter Financial Statements

NON-STATE SYSTEM STREET-AID ALLOCATION (STATE AID TO MUNICIPALITIES POWELL BILL ) N.C. Department of Transportation Financial Management Division

Expenditure Classification by Object Code

Stephanie Smith, Project EngineerW

Heather Hafer, Senior Management Analyst Kate Whan, Public Works Administrative Manager SAN PABLO SUBDIVISION LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING DISTRICT A-03

VILLAGE OF NEW MARYLAND 2015 GENERAL OPERATING FUND BUDGET. 1. Total Budget - Total Page 17 $4,466,360

CITY OF ABBOTSFORD MUNICIPAL TICKET INFORMATION BYLAW, 2007, AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 39

CAPITAL FUNDS 2015 Budget

CITY OF CHINO ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE. Quantity Unit Item Unit Total Cost Price Per Item. LS Traffic Control (5% of construction cost) 5% $

Legislative (Cty Council)

City of Dallas Infrastructure Management Plan

City of Denton Debt Summary Report Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2017

AN ACT to create (4e) and of the statutes; relating to: limiting

City of Glendale, Arizona Pavement Management Program

Life Cycle Cost analysis in Drainage Projects TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Concrete Pipe Association of Australasia ACN

ANNUAL BUDGET FISCAL YEAR

TRENCH PERMIT. CITY OF SOMERSWORTH NH 18 Lilac Lane - (603) Please Fax at (603) Date: Permit# Dig Safe # Fee = $70.

Saanich Citizen and Business Surveys 2015 February 2015

Public Money & Public Demands: Part I 4/11/

Statistical Section (Unaudited)

Credit Presentation of the City of Los Angeles Richard H. Llewellyn Jr., City Administrative Officer

I N T R O D U C T I O N

PROJECT EVALUATION FORM

CITY OF EAST POINT SUMMARY OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING

This page intentionally left blank

4. New $ 100 Minimum Plumbing, HVAC, Alarms, Sprinklers, and any permanent systems 5. Replacement $ 50 Minimum

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

City of Pacifica General Fund Budget

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION

On motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting thereupon adjourned. (Published in the Wichita Eagle on August 19, 2016 and August 26, 2016)

Transcription:

HF&H Consultants

Presentation Outline Study Purpose Current Overhead Cost Allocations Administrative Operational Potential Enterprise Reimbursements Public Safety Governmental Facilities Capital Right-of-Way Maintenance HF&H Consultants, LLC 1

Study Purpose Review City s existing overhead cost allocations Compliance with industry standards Potential refinements Identify potential additional reimbursements from enterprises to General Fund for other services Public Safety Governmental Facilities Capital Right-of-Way Maintenance Document current and proposed cost allocations Methodology Legal compliance HF&H Consultants, LLC 2

Current Overhead Cost Allocations Summary of Overhead Allocations Overhead Overhead Overhead Allocation Allocation Allocation Allowable Charged Uncharged Total $6,090,231 $5,294,489 $795,742 To Enterprises & Other Revenue Funds $1,950,842 $1,155,100 $795,742 HF&H Consultants, LLC 3

Current Overhead Cost Allocations Potential refinements Identify any direct charges and exclude them from allocations based on budgets Adjust for budget items that have relatively low associated overhead before making allocations based on budgets Cost of purchased water HF&H Consultants, LLC 4

Potential Enterprise Reimbursements Summary of Enterprise Allocations Allocation Type Water Sewer Subtotal Public Safety $138,237 $139,878 $278,115 Governmental Facilities Capital $108,805 $36,934 $145,739 Right-of-Way Maintenance $702,010 $587,793 $1,289,802 Total $949,052 $764,605 $1,713,657 HF&H Consultants, LLC 5

Potential Enterprise Reimbursements Legal requirements Reimbursements are subject to Article XIIID of the California Constitution governing property related fees and charges (1996 - Proposition 218) Water and sewer rates must be proportional cost of providing service The Roseville decision (2002) validates reimbursements from enterprises to the General Fund for services received Reimbursement must be based on cost HF&H Consultants, LLC 6

Potential Enterprise Reimbursements Three reimbursements Public safety The enterprises shares of the cost of protecting utility infrastructure Allocations based on property value Governmental facilities The use by the enterprises of governmental facilities paid for by the General Fund Allocations based on employee headcount Right-of-way maintenance Costs of maintaining rights-of-way overlying and protecting buried infrastructure Allocations based on subsurface volume HF&H Consultants, LLC 7

Public Safety Reimbursement Police and Fire services protect property Police and Fire budgets are allocated in proportion to the value of property Public property valuation Based on replacement cost new less depreciation Common method for establishing fair market value of utilities Private property value Based on assessed value adjusted for market value Includes vehicles HF&H Consultants, LLC 8

Public Safety Allocation Property Allocation Allocation of Public Value Factor Safety Budget Public Water Enterprise $31,960,348 0.685% $138,237 Sewer Enterprise $32,339,635 0.694% $139,878 Enterprise Total $64,299,983 1.379% $278,115 Other Municipal $154,655,386 3.317% $668,928 Total Public $218,955,369 4.695% $947,043 Private $4,444,168,636 95.305% $19,222,270 Total $4,663,124,005 100.000% $20,169,313 HF&H Consultants, LLC 9

Governmental Facilities Reimbursement The General Fund paid for governmental facilities that are used by the City s services, including its enterprises City Hall and City Yard The capital cost of these facilities should be reimbursed Operations and maintenance costs are already reimbursed through overhead cost allocation Reimbursement is based on employee head count City Hall: Water 11.11%, Sewer 2.78% City Yard: Water 44.12%, Sewer 17.65% HF&H Consultants, LLC 10

Governmental Facilities Allocation Annual Cost Recovery is based on a proportionate share of the capital cost Interest Cost is based on the outstanding principal balance on the capital cost Water Sewer Government Facility Share Share Total Annual Cost Recovery $75,508 $25,498 $101,006 Interest Cost $33,297 $11,437 $44,734 $108,805 $36,934 $145,739 HF&H Consultants, LLC 11

HF&H Consultants, LLC 12 Right-of-Way Maintenance Reimbursement The General Fund maintains the rights-of-way for surface and subsurface uses ROW maintenance expenses Pavement and sidewalk repair, traffic signals, storm drainage, signage and markings, mapping, and record keeping Does not include the cost of pavement repair paid for when pipes are installed or repaired Studies indicate that one-third of costs benefit buried infrastructure (water, sewer, stormwater, gas, electric) Allocation among infrastructures is based on volumes of disturbed soil Soil disturbance is directly related to premature wear of rights-of-ways and the need for repair

Right-of-Way Maintenance Reimbursement $1.29 million of the total $6.92 million of ROW costs (19%) is allocated to water and sewer Right-of-Way Allocation Budget Factors Allocations Surface only $2,427,583 0% $0 Surface and Subsurface $4,138,546 33% $1,365,720 Subsurface only $350,000 100% $350,000 ROW total $6,916,129 $1,715,720 Allocation of Subsurface Costs Water $1,715,720 40.9% $702,010 Sewer $1,715,720 34.3% $587,793 $1,289,802 HF&H Consultants, LLC 13

End of Presentation HF&H Consultants, LLC 14