EY Tax Alert Delhi High Court upholds weighted R&D deduction for recognized inhouse R&D facility from the date prior to recognition and approval

Similar documents
Supreme Court rules accumulated losses of amalgamating company to be set off after reducing interest waiver benefit

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Delhi Tribunal rules on advertisement and promotion expenses involving use of trademarks as not royalty.

EY Alert. Kerala High Court quashes 2014 notification amending the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995

EY PAS Alert. Finance bill proposes tax on long-term gains arising on sale of listed equity shares Impact on employee stock option plans

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

MoF issues Notifications and Circular for services relating to transportation of goods by vessel

EY Tax Alert. J&K HC rules that contract receipts of a JV result in diversion of income to JV members; receipt not an income of the JV

EY Tax Alert. Central Government modifies conditions for availing exemption from angel tax provision. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Supreme Court reaffirms constitutional validity of Aadhaar PAN linking requirement. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Mumbai Tribunal rules conversion of compulsory convertible preference shares into equity shares is not transfer.

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Chennai Tribunal upholds salary taxation of SARs benefits received from foreign parent of employer.

HC denies refund of SAD paid on import of coil sheets sold after corrugation as proflex roof

EY Tax Alert. Supreme Court upholds lease equalization adjustment in finance lease as per the ICAI Guidance Note for tax purposes.

EY PAS Alert. Executive summary. Press release dated 27 February

Amendments at enactment stage of Finance Bill, 2017

EY Tax Alert. Delhi Tribunal rules guarantee fee income received by foreign parent from Indian subsidiary is taxable in India.

and Master File implementation

EY Tax Alert. Supreme Court negates claim for 100% deduction for fresh five years of new units undertaking substantial expansion.

Clarifications on Indirect transfer provisions under the Incometax Act, 1961

This Tax Alert provides highlights of the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2017 ( Bill ) introduced in the Lok Sabha on 31 March 2017.

EY Tax Alert. Conversion of company into LLP under LLP Act results in transfer subject to capital gains tax. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Full Bench of Karnataka HC rules incidental interest income earned by Taxpayer is eligible for export incentive scheme deduction

EY Tax Alert Bangalore Tribunal rules on constitution of service PE for services rendered virtually as well as physically

CBDT introduces form for employee investment declarations and extends due date for quarterly withholding statements

Delhi Tribunal rules income of non-resident that is not attributable to PE in India shall still be taxable in India as FTS

Pune Tribunal upholds tax deductibility of MTM exchange fluctuation loss on forex loan borrowed to reduce interest cost and hedge export receivables

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court rules on characterization of property rental income as income from house property.

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert Central Board of Direct Taxes issues final rules prescribing methodology for determining fair market value of unquoted shares

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Guidance Note on FATCA and CRS dated 30 November Key clarifications

Bombay HC upholds non-taxability of deferred consideration on transfer of shares in the absence of accrual

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court rules on year of deductibility of debenture interest paid upfront. 26 March 2015

CBDT releases fifth round of FAQs on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Indian Equalization Levy on digital services to be effective from 1 June 2016, administrative rules notified

EY Tax Alert. CBEC issues clarifications on exports-related refund issues. Executive summary

Control premium in India. Ernst & Young LLP July 2017

EY Tax Alert Indian tax administration issues final rules on certain aspects for determining buy-back tax in India Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary. SEBI releases Discussion Paper on review of framework for Institutional Trading

CBEC releases draft rules on Assessment and Audit under GST and E-Way Bill. The key highlights of the rules are as under:

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT provides clarifications on Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, September 2016

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. SC settles certain controversies on profit-linked deduction for export units. 21 December 2016

GST: How it will impact advertising budgets? June 2017

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Mumbai Tribunal rules on legality and taxability of certain gift transactions by corporates.

AAR rules that provision of business support services to US affiliate are naturally bundled and are not intermediary services

Reserve Bank of India releases draft guidelines for on tap licensing of Universal Banks in the private sector

EY India Defence EY s point of view on amended Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy on Defence Sector

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Tax Alert Key amendments at enactment stage of Finance Bill, 2018

Amendments to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, Executive summary

Reserve Bank of India releases final guidelines for on tap licensing of Universal Banks in the private sector

Operational, prudential and reporting norms for Alternative Investment Funds. Executive summary

CBDT revises rules relating to furnishing information in respect of payments to nonresidents

Bombay HC rules that appropriate State for levy and collection of CST is the State from where movement of goods commences

Kerala HC upholds the constitutional validity of levy of Service tax on admission and access to entertainment event & amusement facilities

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT notifies guidelines for onshore management of offshore funds. 17 March 2016

CBDT releases second round of FAQs on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016

EY Tax Alert. CBEC releases four Rules approved by GST Council and issues Notifications under Central and Integrated GST.

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

CBDT amends rules relating to furnishing information in respect of payments to nonresidents

EY India Real Estate EY s point of view on Amended Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Policy on Construction Development Sector

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Bangalore Tribunal rules on deductibility of employee share reward discount cross-charged by foreign parent company

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Protocol signed on 10 May 2016 to amend the 1982 India- Mauritius tax treaty. 12 May 2016

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court upholds initiation of prosecution for failure to file return. 3 February 2014

High Court rules that in-transit sale in turnkey contracts not eligible for exemption under Section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act

Government of India amends Income Computation and Disclosure Standards and also defers them by one year to tax year

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Mumbai Tribunal rules reimbursement of expenses on secondment of employees not FTS

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Delhi HC rules payment towards live telecast is not royalty. 1 December 2014

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Mumbai Tribunal rules intercompany

Karnataka High Court rules that implementation of customized software is a service and cannot be subject to VAT

Applying Ind AS 115 Automotive: The new revenue recognition standard

Delhi Tribunal rules on indirect transfer of shares on transaction undertaken in 2006

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert Central Government notifies the transactions of listed equity shares not eligible for Long Term capital gains exemption

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Mumbai Tribunal rules charterer includes slot charter arrangement for availing treaty benefit under Article 8 of India Malaysia DTAA

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT sets up a Committee to deal with retroactive indirect transfer taxation. 1 September 2014

Measuring the tax cost of investment in India. Through estimation of marginal effective tax rates (METRs)

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Government of India notifies the entities eligible to issue tax free bonds for financial year

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Transfer pricing for Specified Domestic Transactions

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Third Protocol amending the India-Singapore tax treaty signed. 31 December 2016

Mumbai Tribunal rules on DAPE in case of marketing and distribution activities carried out by an Indian branch for group companies

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. CBDT notifies ITR Forms for Company/ Firms/ LLP/ Trusts and others. 05 August 2015 October 2014

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Mumbai Tribunal rules write-down of investment loss allowable if a direct and proximate nexus exists with a business

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

This Tax Alert summarizes the key indirect tax proposals in the Maharashtra State Budget for the financial year

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary

Securities and Exchange Board of India and the Reserve Bank of India issue guidelines for international financial services centres

EY Tax Alert. Executive summary. Supreme Court upholds disallowance of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt dividend income.

EY Regulatory Alert. Executive summary

Transcription:

8 August 2017 EY Tax Alert Delhi High Court upholds weighted R&D deduction for recognized inhouse R&D facility from the date prior to recognition and approval Tax Alerts cover significant tax news, developments and changes in legislation that affect Indian businesses. They act as technical summaries to keep you on top of the latest tax issues. For more information, please contact your EY advisor. Executive summary This Tax Alert summarizes the ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) in the case of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. [1] (Taxpayer), dated 4 August 2017, on the effective date from which weighted deduction for research and development (R&D) expenditure incurred on inhouse R&D facility recognized and approved by the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR) can be claimed. In the facts of the case, the Taxpayer had intimated DSIR on 30 March 2011, much before the set up of the facility, and then sought recognition and approval for the facility as per the guidelines laid down by DSIR. DSIR granted approval to the facility on 2 February 2015 with effect from 1 April 2013. The HC held that it was incorrect on DSIR s part to deny approval for qualifying expenditure incurred in tax year 2010-11 on the ground that the approval for the facility was effective from tax year 2013-14. The HC allowed the Taxpayer s writ petition to direct DSIR to grant approval for qualifying expenditure incurred from tax year 2010-11. [1] TS-320-HC-2017(DEL)

Background and facts Under the Indian Tax Laws (ITL), taxpayers engaged in the business of biotechnology or manufacturing of any article or thing [2], incurring expenditure on approved in-house R&D facility, are eligible for weighted deduction, currently @ 200% [3] of the qualifying expenditure [4]. The weighted deduction is subject to approvals and conditions as set out in the relevant rules of the ITL and guidelines prescribed by DSIR being the approving authority prescribed under the ITL for the purposes of grant of such approval. DSIR guidelines, inter alia, provide for a three-step sequential process involving application by taxpayer and authorization by DSIR in prescribed forms at each step. First step is recognition of the facility by DSIR. This is generally granted for a period of three years and renewed thereafter. Such recognition does not automatically grant weighted deduction income tax benefit but has other commercial and indirect tax advantages. Second step is approval of the facility by DSIR. This is a pre-condition for availing weighted deduction income tax benefit. The tax rules require taxpayers to make an application in Form 3CK which also comprises an agreement with DSIR, for cooperation and audit of accounts of the R&D facility. The third step is approval of qualifying expenditure by DSIR. This is also a pre-condition for availing weighted deduction income tax benefit. Seeking expenditure approval from DSIR is an annual exercise. DSIR guidelines, inter alia, provide that approval to facility will be granted from the first day of April in which the application is made and any qualifying expenditure incurred from that date would be eligible for weighted deduction. DSIR guidelines also provide that qualifying capital expenditure incurred during the year preceding the year of application, would also be eligible for weighted deduction provided its quantum exceeds INR 10m. The Taxpayer is a leading automobile company in India. The Taxpayer had an existing DSIR approved R&D facility at Gurgaon. The present dispute pertains to additional in-house R&D facility set up by the Taxpayer at Rohtak for which the Taxpayer incurred qualifying expenditure in tax year 2010-11, much prior to initiation of three step process for obtaining recognition and approval from DSIR. The date chronicle for facts relevant to tax year 2010-11 leading to approval of Rohtak facility and related dispute is summarized in the table below. [2] Except certain negative list items specified in Eleventh Schedule of the ITL. [3] Weighted deduction is restricted to 150% from 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2020 (i.e. from tax years 2017-18 to 2019-20) and 100% from 1 April 2020 (i.e. from tax year 2020-21 onwards). [4] Capital expenditure (except on land and building) and revenue expenditure on scientific research, as approved by the DSIR on an annual basis.

Date Event 30 March 2011 The Taxpayer incurred qualifying expenditure of INR 1248m on new Rohtak facility during tax year 2010-11. The Taxpayer informed DSIR that it is in the process of setting up new facility at Rohtak and would be seeking approval for the same. 31 October 2011 The Taxpayer filed an application for approval of R&D expenditure incurred during tax year 2010-11. The subject line of application referred to existing Gurgaon facility but Auditor's report accompanying the application gave break-up of expenditure incurred for both Gurgaon and Rohtak facilities separately. 30 March 2012 The Taxpayer made application for recognition of Rohtak facility. 26 April 2013 DSIR informed the Taxpayer that recognition cannot be granted for Rohtak facility since the facility was not yet functional and, hence, the application was closed as being premature. January February 2014 The Taxpayer resubmitted application for recognition informing DSIR that Rohtak facility had become operational from November 2013. The Taxpayer also furnished details of qualifying expenditure incurred on Rohtak facility during tax year 2010-11. 26 March 2014 DSIR granted recognition to Rohtak facility with effect from 25 February 2014. 31 March 2014 The Taxpayer made application in Form 3CK for approval of Rohtak facility. 2 February 2015 DSIR granted approval for Rohtak facility for the period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2015 (i.e. tax years 2013-14 and 2014-15). Presumably, this was based on DSIR s guideline as per which approval is granted from first day of April of the year in which the application in Form 3CK is made. 9 March 2015 DSIR approved R&D expenditure incurred including on Rohtak facility but DSIR s approval merely referred to Gurgaon facility presumably because the subject line of the Taxpayer s initial application in October 2011 had erroneously referred to Gurgaon facility only. 26 March 2015 The Taxpayer sought clarification by way of inclusion of name of Rohtak facility in DSIR approval granted on 9 March 2015. 7 May 2015 DSIR issued a corrigendum amending and modifying expenditure approval granted earlier on 9 March 2015. DSIR excluded expenditure incurred on Rohtak facility resulting in withdrawal of approval for said expenditure.

Aggrieved by DSIR s action to withdraw the approval for expenditure incurred on Rohtak facility in tax year 2010-11, the Taxpayer filed a writ petition before the Delhi HC seeking to quash the impugned corrigendum and direct DSIR to grant approval for expenditure incurred in tax year 2010-11. Ruling of the HC The HC allowed the writ petition and held that the Taxpayer is entitled to benefit of weighted deduction from tax year 2010-11 for the following reasons: The legislative intent behind the weighted deduction is to encourage establishment of R&D facilities in India and also to encourage innovation. Although the Taxpayer s initial application in October 2011 erroneously referred to existing Gurgaon facility alone, the Auditor s report accompanying the application clearly provided the break up of expenditure on Gurgaon and Rohtak facilities. Furthermore, the Taxpayer has in the pursuit of its application candidly provided requisite details of both facilities since inception. Hence, it was incorrect of DSIR to allege that the Taxpayer had tried to mislead DSIR by providing incorrect information. By its application dated 26 March 2015, the Taxpayer merely sought to correct the error by requesting DSIR to add reference to Rohtak facility in expenditure approval granted on 9 March 2015. At that stage, it was incorrect for DSIR to deny this request and to exclude the expenditure incurred for Rohtak facility depriving the Taxpayer from claiming benefit of legitimate expenditure incurred on Rohtak facility. The earlier rulings of the Delhi HC in case of CIT v Sandan Vikas (India) Ltd. [5] and Gujarat HC in case of CIT v Claris Lifesciences Ltd. [6] make it clear that the legislative intent is to grant deduction for all qualifying expenses on R&D and that, for availing the benefit of weighted R&D deduction, neither the date of recognition nor the cut-off date mentioned in DSIR certificate nor even the date of DSIR approval is relevant. What is relevant is the acknowledgement of DSIR in the form of DSIR recognition. If an in-house R&D facility is not recognized it is not entitled to deduction but if it is recognized, it is entitled to benefit. The Gujarat HC in Claris Lifesciences (supra) ruling rightly observed that restricting the grant of deduction from the date of approval of the R&D facility, not being a part of the provision, amounts to reading more in the law which is not expressly provided. Reliance placed by DSIR on another Delhi HC ruling in the case of Apollo Tyres Ltd. v UOI [7] is misplaced. The said ruling is distinguishable on facts. It is true that in that ruling, the Delhi HC held that unless the taxpayer furnishes agreement in Form 3CK it is not entitled to weighted R&D benefit even if the facility is recognized by DSIR. But, in that case, there was considerable delay on the taxpayer s part to apply for approval of the facility (second step) after having obtained recognition (first step). In that case, DSIR granted recognition in 2004 but the taxpayer applied for approval in 2008. Hence, the Delhi HC did not grant weighted deduction benefit from 2004. However, in the present case, there has been no such lapse. DSIR granted recognition on 26 March 2014 and the Taxpayer immediately applied for approval on 31 March 2014. Hence, Apollo Tyres ruling is clearly distinguishable on facts. An isolated error in an application cannot result in the entire benefit itself being refused to the Taxpayer resulting in it being deprived of the deduction as permissible under the ITL. [5] (2011)(335 ITR 117)(Del) [6] (2010)(326 ITR 251)(Guj) [7] (2010)(SCC Online Del 1599)

Comments The weighted R&D deduction offers significant tax benefit to the eligible taxpayers who set up in-house R&D facilities. The tax benefit is subject to compliance with three-step procedure as outlined in the tax rules and DSIR Guidelines. The present ruling highlights the significance of taxpayers diligently adhering to the compliance process to avail the benefit for the new facility from the inception. The Delhi HC granted the benefit in the present case by overlooking a bonafide error committed by the Taxpayer in its initial application by referring erroneously only to existing Gurgaon facility whereas other support documentation clearly showed that the Taxpayer was seeking approval as well for the new facility at Rohtak. The Delhi HC also distinguished the present case from an earlier case where there was lapse of four years on the taxpayer s part in taking up the second step after completing the first step. The present ruling emphasizes that where taxpayer is diligent in approaching DSIR at the earliest possible opportunity, the tax benefit can be availed even for period prior to the effective date of approval as mentioned in DSIR certificate.

Our offices Ahmedabad 2nd floor, Shivalik Ishaan Near C.N. Vidhyalaya Ambawadi Ahmedabad - 380 015 Tel: + 91 79 6608 3800 Fax: + 91 79 6608 3900 Bengaluru 6th, 12th & 13th floor UB City, Canberra Block No.24 Vittal Mallya Road Bengaluru - 560 001 Tel: + 91 80 4027 5000 + 91 80 6727 5000 + 91 80 2224 0696 Fax: + 91 80 2210 6000 Ground Floor, A wing Divyasree Chambers # 11, O Shaughnessy Road Langford Gardens Bengaluru - 560 025 Tel: +91 80 6727 5000 Fax: +91 80 2222 9914 Chandigarh 1st Floor, SCO: 166-167 Sector 9-C, Madhya Marg Chandigarh - 160 009 Tel: +91 172 331 7800 Fax: +91 172 331 7888 Chennai Tidel Park, 6th & 7th Floor A Block (Module 601,701-702) No.4, Rajiv Gandhi Salai Taramani, Chennai - 600 113 Tel: + 91 44 6654 8100 Fax: + 91 44 2254 0120 Delhi NCR Golf View Corporate Tower B Sector 42, Sector Road Gurgaon - 122 002 Tel: + 91 124 464 4000 Fax: + 91 124 464 4050 3rd & 6th Floor, Worldmark-1 IGI Airport Hospitality District Aerocity, New Delhi - 110 037 Tel: + 91 11 6671 8000 Fax + 91 11 6671 9999 4th & 5th Floor, Plot No 2B Tower 2, Sector 126 NOIDA - 201 304 Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. Tel: + 91 120 671 7000 Fax: + 91 120 671 7171 Hyderabad Oval Office, 18, ilabs Centre Hitech City, Madhapur Hyderabad - 500 081 Tel: + 91 40 6736 2000 Fax: + 91 40 6736 2200 Jamshedpur 1st Floor, Shantiniketan Building Holding No. 1, SB Shop Area Bistupur, Jamshedpur 831 001 Tel: +91 657 663 1000 BSNL: +91 657 223 0441 Kochi 9th Floor, ABAD Nucleus NH-49, Maradu PO Kochi - 682 304 Tel: + 91 484 304 4000 Fax: + 91 484 270 5393 Kolkata 22 Camac Street 3rd Floor, Block C Kolkata - 700 016 Tel: + 91 33 6615 3400 Fax: + 91 33 2281 7750 Mumbai 14th Floor, The Ruby 29 Senapati Bapat Marg Dadar (W), Mumbai - 400 028 Tel: + 91 22 6192 0000 Fax: + 91 22 6192 1000 5th Floor, Block B-2 Nirlon Knowledge Park Off. Western Express Highway Goregaon (E) Mumbai - 400 063 Tel: + 91 22 6192 0000 Fax: + 91 22 6192 3000 Pune C-401, 4th floor Panchshil Tech Park Yerwada (Near Don Bosco School) Pune - 411 006 Tel: + 91 20 6603 6000 Fax: + 91 20 6601 5900 Ernst & Young LLP EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com. Ernst & Young LLP is one of the Indian client serving member firms of EYGM Limited. For more information about our organization, please visit www.ey.com/in. Ernst & Young LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, registered under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 in India, having its registered office at 22 Camac Street, 3rd Floor, Block C, Kolkata - 700016 2017 Ernst & Young LLP. Published in India. All Rights Reserved. This publication contains information in summary form and is therefore intended for general guidance only. It is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither Ernst & Young LLP nor any other member of the global Ernst & Young organization can accept any responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication. On any specific matter, reference should be made to the appropriate advisor. Join India Tax Insights from EY on EY refers to global organization, and/or one or more of the independent member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited