Federal Flood Risk Management Standards. An Update on Federal Flood Resilience Standards

Similar documents
Federal Flood Risk Management Standard

EO 11988, & The Federal Flood Risk Management Standard. FMA September 9, 2015

Disaster Insurance: Are States and Insurance Companies Prepared?

Primer on Executive Order 11988: Floodplain Management

Flood Risk and Climate Adaptation: Policy Reforms and Lessons (Being) Learned from Hurricane Sandy

Climate Change Policy Update:

Challenges and Risks to the Bay Area Maritime and Industrial Economy

ASFPM Update. GAFM 10 th Annual Technical Conference March 24, 2016

The National Flood Insurance Program and Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Francisco. Presentation at Treasure Island Community Meeting

Executive Director Deputy Director Director Emeritus Chad M. Berginnis, CFM Ingrid D. Wadsworth, CFM Larry A. Larson, P.E., CFM

January 30, HQ, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ATTN: EO13690/CECW-HS/3G G Street N.W. Washington, DC Re: Docket COE

Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) Program

Levee Safety The Middle Age Of Levee Safety Development

Using GISWeb to Determine Your Property s Flood Zone

Meeting the Nation s Levee Challenges

Improving Coordinated Flood Preparedness and Response

Preliminary Work Map Release

*How Federal Policy. Causes Flood Disasters. Leslie A. Bond, CFM LA Bond Associates

Floodplain Management Annual Conference Atlanta, Georgia April 2017

National Flood Risk Management Program

Green Stormwater. Flood Risk Reduction. Infrastructure for. June Presented by: Kari Mackenbach, CFM ms consultants Lynn Mayo, PE, CFM AECOM

National Flood Insurance Program Final Nationwide Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement

Fighting the Flood: Current Political, Regulatory and Financial Challenges

The National Flood Insurance Program A Model for Risk Management

CITY OF VESTAVIA HILLS

Flood Risk Review and Resilience Meeting: Allegheny County

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

This survey is expected to take approximately 20 minutes and must be completed in one session.

Door County Floodplain Program Informational Meeting

U.S. Updates: Climate Change, Maintenance and Investigations

Billing Code DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. 24 CFR Parts 50, 55, and 58. [Docket No. FR-5423-F-02] RIN 2501-AD51

Historic Structures in the Floodplain

Flood Protection Structure Accreditation Task Force: Final Report

Flood Risk in the Schuylkill Watershed. Planning for Resilient Communities

Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana Flood Insurance Study Update Risk Analysis March 3, Shona Gibson Project Monitor, FEMA Region VI

Flood Risk Management and Nonstructural Flood Risk Adaptive Measures

FEMA s Flood Map Modernization Preparing for FY09 and Beyond: Integrated Flood Data Update, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning

Leveraging HAZUS for Risk Assessment Analysis within Risk MAP

ASFPM Update OUR CHALLENGE. Floods are 'acts of God,' but flood losses are largely acts of man. Fall, 2016

DeSoto Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kick-off Meeting. February 16, 2016 Grand Cane, LA

Expediting the Federal Environmental Review Process in Indian Country

AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 50: FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Nonstructural Flood Proofing Committee Work Plan

Living with levees: using tolerable risk guidelines in California

Piloting LAMP from Stream to Sea

Facts & Info regarding the NFIP in Mathews County VA And the Mathews County Floodplain Management Ordinance

Analysis and Mapping Procedures for Non-Accredited Levees

Floodplain Management Plan

Frequently Asked Questions

Floodplain Management 101. Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Floodplain Management Bureau

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

Presentation Overview

Federal Emergency Management Agency

State Perspectives on Critical Water Issues: ASFPM Update NAFSMA Annual Meeting

Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

Catharine Cyr Ransom. The Accord Group

A Little Less Conversation a Little More ACTION! Louie Greenwell, GISP, CFM T&M Associates Carey Johnson KY Division of Water

Levees: PL84-99 and the NFIP

State of Missouri Five-Year Floodplain Management Plan

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

Re: Seeking public comment on the draft Guidelines for Implementing the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard: Docket ID FEMA

BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Office of the Flood Insurance Advocate.

Mitigation Works. 0 With its devastating combination of water, mud, and sewage, the damages caused by flooding are particularly wrenching.

ASFPM Update and NFIP Reform. KAMM 10 th Anniversary Conference September 9, 2014

Hazard Mitigation FAQ

National Flood Insurance Program

Tangipahoa Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mitigation Steering Committee Kick-off Meeting. September 9, 2014 Hammond, LA

Federal Emergency Management Agency

TESTIMONY. Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS (ABFEs)

Justification for Floodplain Regulatory Standards in Illinois

USACE Levee Safety Meeting FEMA Overview

Modernization, FEMA is Recognizing the connection between damage reduction and

GAFM Showcase: Multiple Agencies Combating Georgia s Flood Risk Together: Proven Results Gained by Strong Partnerships

Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act of 2012

USACE Silver Jackets, the Missouri State Risk Management Team and State Hazard Mitigation

Table 1: Federal, State and Local Government Rules applicable to LOMRs/CLOMRS submittal

10526 Bermuda Isle Dr. Tampa, FL 33647

Accounting for Long-Term Erosion and Sea Level Rise in New England: A TMAC Recommendation

Plan Maintenance Procedures

Findings/Debrief Meeting September 9, CDOT R4 Headquarters Big Thompson Conference Room W 10 th St. Greeley, CO 80634

Passaic River Basin Flood Advisory Commission Report/Status of Recommendations. October 2014 Update

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Update. Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10

Floodplain Management and Florida s Initiatives for Resiliency

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Best Practices. for Incorporating Building Science Guidance into Community Risk MAP Implementation November 2012

Federal Emergency Management Agency

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

Agenda. Introduction. Introduction -Map Study Lifecycle. Insurance Benefits of New Map

Federal Emergency Management Agency

10/5/2015. What Makes a Sound Floodplain Management Program? What are the Flood Problems in your Community?

CRS State Profile: Wyoming

Federal Emergency Management Agency Update. Jesse F. Munoz, CEM Director Mitigation Division Region IV

Flood Hazards and Flood Risk, the Impact of a Changing Climate

In 1993, spring came in like a lion, but refused

Federal Emergency Management Agency

Transcription:

Federal Flood Risk Management Standards An Update on Federal Flood Resilience Standards

Purpose of Today s Briefing Facilitate the understanding of Executive Order (E.O.)13690 and its implementation Discuss key changes between E.O. 11988 and 13690 1

Updating Federal Flood Risk Standards 2

Executive Order 11988 Issued May 1977 governing federal actions in the floodplain Each agency shall provide leadership and shall take action to reduce the risk of flood loss, to minimize the impact of floods on human safety, health and welfare, and to restore and preserve the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains in carrying out its responsibilities for (1) acquiring, managing, and disposing of federal lands, and facilities; (2) providing federally undertaken, financed, or assisted construction and improvements; (3) conducting federal activities and programs affecting land use, including but not limited to water and related land resources planning, regulating, and licensing activities. 3

Executive Order 11988 Implementing Guidelines In February 1978, the Water Resources Council (WRC) issued Floodplain Management Guidelines (Implementing Guidelines or Guidelines) which contained broad instructions for federal agencies to implement the Executive Order including: Directed federal agencies to evaluate practicable alternatives to locating an action in a floodplain and Established an 8-step decision making process. 4

Executive Order 13690 and National Policy It is the policy of the United States to improve the resilience of communities and federal assets against the impacts of flooding. These impacts are anticipated to increase over time due to the effects of climate change and other threats. Losses caused by flooding affect the environment, our economic prosperity, and public health and safety, each of which affects our national security. - Executive Order 13690 5

Executive Order 13690 On January 30th, the President signed Executive Order 13690, which amends Executive Order 11988 and establishes the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS or Standard). On February 5 th, FEMA, on behalf of the Mitigation Federal Leadership Group (MitFLG), published in the Federal Register for notice and comment a draft of revisions to the 1978 Floodplain Management Guidelines. The draft Guidelines contain the basic interpretation of Executive Order 11988, as amended by the Executive Order 13690 and the FFRMS. Executive Order 13690 also requires agencies to develop Implementation Plans describing how each agency will update its existing policies, procedures and/or regulations to comply with the new requirements. 6

Applying the Standard Does Apply Federal agencies will continue to implement Executive Order 11988, but replacing the 100-year base in the Executive Order with the process identified in the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard. Does Not Apply Executive Order 13690 does not prohibit building in the floodplains. EO 13690 does not apply to private investments in structures, facilities, or homes. The Standard will not affect flood insurance premiums or the requirements for participation in the NFIP. No change to: community floodplain management requirements, FEMA s flood mapping standards, FEMA s levee accreditation regulations (44 CFR 65.10), or rating/pricing practices of the NFIP. 7

Approaches in the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard Federal agencies will be given the flexibility to select the best approach for establishing the elevation and flood hazard area used when implementing Executive Order 11988 as amended by Executive Order 13690: Utilizing best-available, actionable data and methods that integrate current and future changes in flooding based on science; Two or three feet of elevation, (depending on criticality), above the 100- year, or 1%-annual-chance, flood elevation; or 500-year, or 0.2%-annual-chance, flood elevation. 8

Soliciting Input: Listening Sessions On behalf of the MitFLG, FEMA hosted listening sessions to gather feedback on the implementation of the FFRMS. 9

We Listened, and This Is What We Heard Impact of EO 13690 on permitting and financial transactions Need for consistency across agencies Importance of leveraging existing programs and resources Need for clarity on roles, definitions, and processes 10

Clarifications Made Based on Public Input The comments and input were reviewed, discussed, and addressed by a MitFLG working group. These comments spanned many topics. Some of the major topics included: Scope and applicability of E.O. 11988, as amended to include the FFRMS, and the associated implications for implementation; The concept of best available data and information, especially as it relates to the climate-informed science approach and mapping information available to determine the floodplain; Questions about the impact of E.O. 13690 on the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and other Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) programs; Concerns about consistency in implementation across federal agencies; Requests for clarification or additional information on critical actions and nature-based approaches; Suggestions and questions about the development of agency-specific guidelines and implementation plans; Questions and suggestions about how other levels of government should be involved in the process and, in particular, how state, local, tribal, or territorial standards will be addressed; and Clarification on how E.O. 13690 applies to leveed areas. 11

A Comparison of E.O. 11988 and E.O. 13690 Federal Activities to Which the E.O. Applies E.O. 11988 (1977) E.O. 13690 (2015) EO 11988 applies to the following actions: acquiring, managing, and disposing of federal lands and facilities; providing federally-undertaken, financed, or assisted construction and improvements; conducting federal activities and programs affecting land use, including but not limited to water and related land resources planning, regulation, and licensing. Federal agencies will continue to implement Executive Order 11988, but replace the 100-year base flood elevation with the elevation component and corresponding horizontal floodplain of the FFRMS for projects that use Federal funding for new construction, substantial improvement, or to address substantial damage to a structure or facility. Federally funded projects are a subset of federal actions. 12

A Comparison of E.O. 11988 and E.O. 13690 Elevation/Resilience Requirements E.O. 11988 (1977) E.O. 13690 (2015) The base-flood (1-percent annual chance flood) elevation as depicted on FEMA maps (the EO references HUD, as the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) resided in the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development in 1977). 13 The FFRMS allows agencies to choose an elevation/resilience standard from one of the following options (or combination of): Utilizing the best-available, actionable hydrologic and hydraulic data and methods that integrate current and future changes in flooding based on climate science (including an emphasis on whether the activity is critical); Two or three feet of elevation, (depending on if the activity is critical), added to the 1%-annual-chance, flood elevation; or 0.2%-annual-chance flood elevation; The elevation and flood hazard area that result from using any other method identified in an update to the FFRMS; and, All other requirements of E.O. 13690 apply to all federal actions.

A Comparison of E.O. 11988 and E.O. 13690 Protection of Critical Actions E.O. 11988 (1977) Did not define critical actions. Critical actions were defined in the 1978 Implementing Guidelines and recommended substituting the 0.2 percent annual-chance- flood elevation for the base-flood during the decision making process. E.O. 13690 (2015) Defined critical actions, consistent with the 1978 Implementing Guidelines, as any activity for which even a slight chance of flooding is too great. FFRMS approaches include an emphasis on whether the activity is critical and provides more stringent options for use in those cases. 14

A Comparison of E.O. 11988 and E.O. 13690 Use of Natural or Nature-based Approaches E.O. 11988 (1977) Focuses on preserving natural and beneficial functions of floodplains and avoiding adverse impacts to those floodplain values where practicable. Agencies were not precluded from considering nature-based solutions. E.O. 13690 (2015) Where possible, an agency shall use natural systems, ecosystem processes, and nature-based approaches when developing alternatives for consideration. Nature-based approaches are discussed in detail in Step 3, 4, and 5 of the Guidelines. 15

Key Changes to the Guidelines for Implementing E.O. 11988 and E.O. 13690 The Guidelines continue to include key concepts from the 1978 Guidelines, including the following: The Guidelines are advisory and provide broad guidance in the implementation of E.O. 11988. The scope of E.O. 11988 applies to Federal agencies and actions defined in the Glossary. 16

Key Changes to the Guidelines for Implementing E.O. 11988 and E.O. 13690 Continued The Guidelines contain important updates and new concepts, including: The Guidelines incorporate the FFRMS and amendments found in E.O. 13690, such as: The requirement that agencies, where possible, use natural systems, ecosystem processes, and nature-based approaches in the development of alternatives for all actions to which E.O. 11988 applies; Agencies will use greater resilience standards for actions they determine to be critical; 17

Key Changes to the Guidelines for Implementing E.O. 11988 and E.O. 13690 Continued The requirement for agencies to expand management from the base flood elevation to a higher vertical flood elevation and corresponding horizontal floodplain (as described in the FFRMS) for federally funded projects. Defined as, actions where Federal funds are used for new construction, substantial improvement, or to address substantial damage to structures and facilities. All other federal actions are subject to the 1-percent annual chance floodplain. 18

Key Changes to the Guidelines for Implementing E.O. 11988 and E.O. 13690 Continued The Guidelines include floodplain definitions to reflect the new approaches for determining the vertical flood elevation and corresponding horizontal floodplain described in the FFRMS. The Guidelines describe a new exception for actions that are considered to be in the interest of national security. Excepted actions will not be subject to the FFRMS standard; however, they are still expected to apply the 8-step decision-making process. 19

Key Changes to the Guidelines for Implementing E.O. 11988 E.O. 13690 Continued The FFRMS is a resilience standard. The vertical flood elevation and corresponding horizontal floodplain determined using the approaches in the FFRMS establish the level to which a structure or facility must be resilient. Agencies will continue to comply with the 1977 version of E.O. 11988 until they update their implementing regulations or procedures, as appropriate. Each agency may have a different schedule for these updates. 20

FFRMS - Timeline January 30, 2015 President signs Executive Order 13690 February 5, 2015 Draft revisions to 1978 Floodplain Management Guidelines are published for comment March - April 2015 Listening Sessions conducted across the country and virtually May 6, 2015 Deadline for public comment on draft revised Guidelines June 6, 2015 Agencies submitted draft Implementation Plans to the National Security Council staff July - August 2015 MitFLG revised the Guidelines based on the input that was received September 2015 MitFLG provides the recommendations on the Guidelines to the Water Resources Council (WRC), who will finalize and issue the Guidelines October 8, 2015 The WRC unanimously accepted the MitFLG s suggested revisions to the Guidelines. Ongoing Following the publication of the final Guidelines, Agencies will update policies, procedures, and /or regulations for implementing the Executive Orders. Those agency and program-specific updates are anticipated to provide for additional public engagement 21

For More Information Executive Order 11988 Floodplain Management https://www.fema.gov/executive-order-11988-floodplain-management Fact Sheet on E.O. 13690 https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ceq/press_releases/january_30_2015 Website on E.O. 13690 and the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard https://www.fema.gov/federal-flood-risk-management-standard-ffrms The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers produced and a fact sheet in response to questions about Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/missions/floodriskmanagement/floodriskmanagementpr ogram/abouttheprogram/policyandguidance/federalfloodriskmanagementstandard.as px HUD s Implementation of E.O. 13690 and the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard addresses the application of the FFRMS to single-family home mortgages for acquisition or refinancing of existing homes under the Federal Housing Administration or any other programs. 22

QUESTIONS? Susan W. Wilson, CFM DHS/FEMA Region IV 770 220 5414 Susan.wilson@fema.dhs.gov 23