Edison (Township of) NJ

Similar documents
New Issue: Moody's upgrades Edgewater, NJ's GO to Aa2: assigns MIG 1 to $15.4M in BANs

Roselle Park Borough, NJ

WILTON (TOWN OF) CT. Update to credit analysis. Credit strengths. » Affluent residential tax base. Credit challenges

Butler (Village of), WI

Port Jefferson Union Free School District, NY

City of Oakland, CA. Update to Credit Analysis. CREDIT OPINION 19 April Summary

Socorro Independent School District, TX

Somerset Hills School District, NJ

Cocoa (City of) FL. Update to credit analysis following assignment of Aa2 issuer rating. CREDIT OPINION 12 April Summary.

Sanger (City of) TX. Credit Strengths. Trend of growing reserve levels. Continued tax base growth. Favorable location 40 miles north of Dallas

Carroll (County of) MD

Weber School District, UT

Town of Easton, MA. Credit Strengths. Manageable long-term liabilities. Credit Challenges. Reliance on reserves to address budget gaps

Newport News (City of) VA

Socorro Independent School District, TX

State Outlook: Debt Affordability. NCSL Conference Gail Sussman, Managing Director

Westport (Town of) CT

Snohomish County Public Utility District 1

Masconomet Regional School District, MA

OECD Workshop on Data Collection

Volusia County School District (FL)

City of Mesquite, TX

Town of Beekman, NY. Credit Strengths. Solid reserve and liquidity levels. Low debt burden with rapid repayment. Credit Challenges

Findlay City School District, OH

Columbia School District, MO

Allen Independent School District, TX

St. Mary's County, MD

City of Tega Cay, SC. Annual Comment on Tega Cay RATING. ISSUER COMMENT 23 March 2018

Township of Tredyffrin, PA

Bothell (City of) WA

Cherokee County Board of Education, AL

Agenda. New Mexico School District Bond Ratings 9/8/17

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings

Celina Independent School District, TX

Rating Action: Moody's Upgrades the City of Sacramento, CA's Lease Revenue Bonds to A1; Confirms Ser and Ser. 1993A at A2; outlook is stable

Lubbock (City of), TX

Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings in the European Union

Bexar County, TX. Exhibit 1 Assessed Valuation Gains Reflect Continued Economic Activity CLIENT SERVICES. Source: Bexar County, TX,

Rio Rancho, NM. Credit Strengths. Sizeable and stable tax base. Healthy reserves. Manageable debt burden with rapid payout.

Underwriting standards for credit cards and auto loans tighten modestly, a positive

Huffman Independent School District, TX

Findlay City School District, OH

Township of Nutley, NJ

Montgomery County, TX

US Local Government GO Debt Methodology

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Lowe's unsecured ratings to Baa1; P-2 commercial paper rating affirmed 12 Dec 2018

Wicomico County, MD. Credit Strengths. » Well-funded pension plan. Credit Challenges. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Taos Municipal School District 1, NM

Rockwall County, TX. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Above average socioeconomic indices. Credit Challenge

New Issue: Moody's assigns Aa2 to Framingham, MA's $43.9M GO bonds, MIG 1 to $4.4M GO BANs

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to West Virginia SBA's $44.4M Capital Improvement Ref. Rev. Bonds, Ser Global Credit Research - 08 Sep 2017

Celina Independent School District, TX

Hoover (City of), AL

City of Isle of Palms, SC

City of Oak Creek, WI

Prince William County, VA

Newport News, VA. Summary Rating Rationale. Credit Strengths. Strong financial management. Credit Challenges. Below average demographics

Regional Economic Outlook

Dallas County Community College District, TX

ISSUER COMMENT 02 DECEMBER 2014

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A1 to UConn GO bonds supported by State of Connecticut; outlook stable Global Credit Research - 29 Mar 2018

Bernalillo Municipal School District 1 (Sandoval County), NM

Shreveport, LA. Credit Strengths. Credit Challenges. Very limited liquidity. Weak income and employment trends. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Park District of La Grange, IL

Oakland (City of), CA

Sevierville (City of) TN

Mongolian Banking System

Evanston (City of), IL

Siauliu Bankas, AB. Siauliu Bankas capital metrics will strengthen with EBRD s debt-to-equity conversion. ISSUER COMMENT 13 August 2018

Rating Update: Moody's affirms Aa3 on Waukegan Park District, IL's GO debt

Policy on the "SEC Rule 17g-7 of Representation and Warranties" (R&Ws)

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, IL

Prince William County, VA

George W. Kuhn Drainage District (Oakland County), MI

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to 2016B & C Senior Bonds of Central Florida Expressway Auth. (CFX), FL; Outlook positive

New Issue: Moody's assigns MIG 1 to Oakland City's (CA) TRAN

West Fargo Public School District No. 6, ND

Massachusetts (Commonwealth of)

Disruption in Higher Education: What Does It Mean For Credit Ratings

Las Cruces School District 2, NM

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Aa1 issuer and bond ratings of the International Finance Facility for Immunisation (IFFIm) with a stable outlook

Montgomery County, TX

blend Funding plc Update to credit analysis Credit strengths » Liquidity reserve as structural enhancement Credit challenges

Jersey City Community Charter School, NJ

City of Las Cruces, NM

Special Tax: Transportation-Related

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades South Carolina Public Service Authority revenue bonds; rating outlook negative

Duquesne University of the Holy Spirit, PA

Federal Home Loan Banks

New Issue: Moody's assigns A1 to Ford County USD No. 443's (KS) GOs Series 2015-A and Series 2015-B

Ag Lending Experience of Living Through the Cycles

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Counterparty Risk Ratings to three Sri Lankan banks 18 Jun 2018

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Q1 2018: Higher impairment offset revenue growth. ISSUER COMMENT 16 May Summary opinion

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa3 to Trinity Health Credit Group's (MI) Ser bonds; outlook revised to stable

American Samoa (Territory of)

Rating Action: Moody's downgrades Bharti's senior unsecured notes to Ba1 and assigns a Ba1 CFR; outlook negative 05 Feb 2019

Connecticut (State of) State Revolving Fund

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Caa3 Issuer Rating to US Virgin Islands; lowers ratings on four liens of Matching Fund Revenue Bonds

Rating Action: Moody's assigns Aa2 UND/Aa3 ENH to Roswell ISD (Chaves County), NM's GOULT bonds, Ser Sep 2018

Rating Action: Moody's reviews Depfa ACS Bank's public sector covered bonds for downgrade Global Credit Research - 14 Sep 2016

Transcription:

CREDIT OPINION Edison (Township of) NJ Update to credit opinion Summary The Township of Edison, New Jersey is a near suburb of New York City (Aa2 stable). The township boasts moderately above-average resident wealth and income levels. It has recently seen considerable tax base growth and full value has surpassed its pre-recession peak. Contacts Douglas Goldmacher +1.212.553.1477 Analyst douglas.goldmacher@moodys.com Thomas Jacobs +1.212.553.0131 Senior Vice President thomas.jacobs@moodys.com On January 23, 2018 a press release was published in which a MIG 1 was assigned to the township's $63.2 million BANs. Credit strengths» Large tax base with above-average resident wealth and incomes» History of market access CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653» Favorable location near job centers in greater New York City area Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077» Expanding tax base Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 Credit challenges» Depletion of some non-current Fund reserves Rating outlook The stable outlook on the underlying rating reflects the township's large, stable tax base and strong financial position. Factors that could lead to an upgrade (long-term only)» Continued tax base expansion» Increased resident wealth and incomes and» Significant increase in reserves Factors that could lead to a downgrade» Material deterioration of the tax base» Reduced resident wealth and incomes» Significant depletion of reserves Key indicators

Exhibit 1 Edison (Township of) NJ 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $14,075,727 $14,034,988 $14,576,442 $15,665,351 $15,835,821 100,116 100,513 101,051 101,865 101,996 $140,594 $139,634 $144,248 $153,785 $155,259 161.0% 162.8% 161.5% 158.3% 158.3% Operating Revenue ($000) $111,446 $119,594 $123,506 $121,375 $129,692 Fund Balance ($000) $26,494 $15,688 $20,321 $18,302 $17,050 Cash Balance ($000) $45,501 $36,052 $41,899 $38,719 $38,224 Economy/Tax Base Total Full Value ($000) Population Full Value Per Capita Median Family Income (% of US Median) Finances Fund Balance as a % of Revenues 23.8% 13.1% 16.5% 15.1% 13.1% Cash Balance as a % of Revenues 40.8% 30.1% 33.9% 31.9% 29.5% Debt/Pensions Net Direct Debt ($000) 3-Year Average of Moody's ANPL ($000) Net Direct Debt / Operating Revenues (x) Net Direct Debt / Full Value (%) $58,535 $78,058 $74,082 $96,817 $87,950 $214,306 $245,151 $272,267 $311,822 $336,079 0.5x 0.7x 0.6x 0.8x 0.7x 0.4% 0.5% Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Revenues (x) 1.9x 2.0x 2.2x 2.6x 2.6x Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Full Value (%) 1.5% 1.7% 1.9% 2.0% 2.1% The fund balances in the above table reflects the Moody's-adjusted fund balance. Sources: Moody's Investors Service and Edison audited financial statements Profile Edison is a near suburb of New York City with a population of just over 100,000. Detailed credit considerations Long Term Credit Quality The township's tax base will continue to grow modestly as it benefits from its favorable location and ongoing development. Edison, located 10 miles west of Staten Island, is approximately 70% residential, 15% commercial, and 14% industrial. Resident wealth and income in the $16.4 billion tax base are above-average, with a median family income equal to 158.3% of the national median. The township's equalized full value, which just surpassed its pre-recession peak, as grown at a compound annual rate of 3.1% over the last five years. Although the base is largely built out, management reports considerable ongoing redevelopment, notably in the warehousing sector, which has been leading to increases in value. Due primarily to a substantial gap between assessed and equalized values, tax appeals occur routinely. The township budgets approximately $2 million annually for lost tax appeals and has, in the past, issued debt to pay for losses beyond this amount. Favorably, recent efforts by the township government, coupled with the return to tax base growth, have stemmed the tide of tax appeals. The township has also adopted a policy of aggressively fighting appeals at which it has enjoyed considerable success. The township's financial position will likely remain strong in the medium term as management continues to budget conservatively. In 2016, Current Fund balance increased to $10.8 million, or 8.4% of revenues, from $8 million, or 6.6% of revenues in 2015. Moody's makes certain adjustments to New Jersey local governments' fund balances to include receivables and reserves that would be eligible to be included in fund balance under GAAP accounting but are excluded as a result of state statutory accounting regulations. The township's Moody's-adjusted Current Fund Balance decreased slightly in 2016 to $17.1 million (13.1%) from $18.3 million (15.1%) in 2015. This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2

In 2014 the township drew down the remaining balance in the Water Utility Fund. This fund has no revenues and exists only to pay debt service associated with the water system. All fund balance previously in the system was proceeds of sale by the township of a concession to run the water system in exchange for a single payment 20 years ago. The concession ended in 2017 will shortly go out to bid for another long-term contract. For now, debt service will be paid out of the Current Fund; the total amount of additional debt service is non-material to the Current Fund. Liquidity and Debt Service Coverage LIQUIDITY Liquidity is likely to remain strong in the medium term. Current Fund net cash was essentially flat at $38.2 million, or 29.5% of revenues, in 2016. Preliminary 2017 results are even higher, due in large part to abnormally high prepaid taxes. The township is exploring various options on how best to safely invest the cash until it is needed. Total liquidity coverage of debt service on the township's notes tends to be strong. Including township Current Fund, trust fund, and utility fund cash debt service by projected liquidity is estimated to be approximately 1.4 times. Legal Covenants The township is a frequent market participant and has issued short-term notes in each of the last five years, a factor in our assignment of the MIG 1 rating. Management has also historically sold refunding notes with adequate time before note maturity. The new notes are expected to mature February 8, 2019. The township typically repays the notes by issuing new ones while also making principal paydowns according the schedule set by New Jersey (A3 stable) law. DEBT STRUCTURE All of Edison's debt is fixed rate. DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES The township is not party to any interest rate swaps or other derivatives. PENSIONS AND OPEB Edison has an above-average defined-benefit pension burden, based on Moody's-estimated share of a cost-sharing plans administered by the state. Moody's adjusted net pension liability (ANPL) for the township, under our methodology for adjusting reported pension data, is $389.5 million, or an above-average 3 times Current Fund revenues. The township's 2016 contribution to the combined Police and Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS) and Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) was just under $11 million. Moody's ANPL reflects certain adjustments we make to improve comparability of reported pension liabilities. The adjustments are not intended to replace the township's reported liability information, but to improve comparability with other rated entities. In 2016, total fixed costs including debt service, OPEB, and pensions was 25.5% of revenues. Management New Jersey Cities have an Institutional Framework score of Aa, which is high compared to the nation. Institutional Framework scores measure a sector's legal ability to increase revenues and decrease expenditures. The sector's major revenue sources are subject to a cap which can be overridden with voter approval only. However, the cap of 2% still allows for moderate revenue-raising ability and excludes debt service, pensions, and certain health care costs. Unpredictable revenue fluctuations tend to be minor, or under 5% annually. Across the sector, fixed and mandated costs are generally greater than 25% of expenditures. Unpredictable expenditure fluctuations tend to be minor, under 5% annually. The State has public sector unions, which can limit the ability to cut expenditures. Management has previously experienced significant turnover with multiple CFOs in only a few years. The new team was brought into place in July 2015 which has been working on improving financial operations, elevating financial forecasting and management reporting, and creating a more detailed debt management plan. 3

2018 Moody s Corporation, Moody s Investors Service, Inc., Moody s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, MOODY S ). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ( MIS ) ARE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody s Corporation ( MCO ), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading Investor Relations Corporate Governance Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy. Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY S affiliate, Moody s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to wholesale clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a wholesale client and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to retail clients within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ( MJKK ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody s SF Japan K.K. ( MSFJ ) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ( NRSRO ). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 4 1109392

CLIENT SERVICES 5 Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454