August 10 th 2015 Won2One with Nick Foglietta Tactical Equity Income Model Portfolio Record 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% -40% S&P/TSX Composite RBC TEAM 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Tactical Equity Income Model Present Conditions: TEAM Model Asset Allocation: 50% Equities/ 50% Fixed Income S&P/TSX 60 Closing Value: 14,303 TSX 200 Day Moving Ave: 14,795 % Above/Below 200 Day Moving Ave: 3.33% Below Levels for change: 100% stocks - TSX 15,539 and 100% fixed income TSX 14,060 Weekly Quote You no longer play for a city anymore; you re playing for an entire country. brother of David Price, the new Toronto Blue Jay ace pitcher #cometogether
S&P500 Fundamental Valuation Analysis These charts are not new to longer term readers. I have used them in the past. But it has been a while so let s take a peek again and see if anything has changed. Chart 1 shows the log scale valuation of the S&P500 on the top graphic and the corresponding Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio to go with the S&P500 valuation. (The higher the P/E ratio the more expensive the stock market is considered.) To make the data even easier to understand, Doug Short (dshort.com) has added a red regression line on the S&P500 chart. The regression line represents the mid-point of the long term uptrend. Notice how the stock market tends to oscillate on each side of the red line over the long term. Clearly, on a long term historical basis the S&P500 is relatively expensive by the P/E ratio measure. That is the main take away from the first chart.
The second chart gives us a bit more feel for how expensive the S&P500 is at this time. Doug Short has added standard deviation analysis to his chart below. Two things stand out on this chart: 1. The most obvious, the S&P500 is at the second most expensive level relative to its own trend line in the past 135 years. 2. Even at the bottom of the 2009 decline, S&P500 stocks only just nudged below their Arithmetic MEAN. What the chart is saying is, as bad as the 2008-2009 decline was, we never really got to a point where the S&P500 was CHEAP! Before we jump ahead to apply what we see above to your portfolio I have one more chart to show you. Again, I have used this before and it just keeps getting better as each quarter goes by. You are looking at a plot of the monetary base divided into US GDP on the X axis graphed against the US 90 day T-bill yield on the Y axis. The chart has a dot for every quarter since 1929.
The conditions graphed above cannot happen naturally. The central bank must manipulate the bond markets to create these conditions. The point of showing the chart is to understand how manipulated the present condition is! So what Nick stock markets are expensive? They can stay expensive for a long time they can get more expensive. This doesn t change the reality that if I sell my stocks that pay great dividends that I get next to nothing on my cash! Each week I agree with every person I talk to who makes the above point. It is absolutely true. What is equally true is that EVERYBODY figures they are going to be smart enough to get out when the reset button is hit and we know that each and every share has to be held by somebody at the end of each trading day making it is IMPOSSIBLE for EVERYBODY to get out! So what is the balance investors need to reach? Truly, it is a personal decision based upon really knowing your own investment personality. The question I constantly pose to people is HOW LONG AND HOW DEEP OF A DIP IN STOCK MARKETS ARE YOU WILLING TO LIVE THROUGH? The chart below is completely hypothetical but forces you to ask yourself some great questions about how you feel about your stock market investments.
The first green line depicts an average correction for the stock market. Let s assume it represents a 25% dip from the Start here point and a total length of time 30 months to make a new high again. The BIG question: How comfortable would you be to hold your equity positions through this type of a correction? The second blue line represents what I consider to be more likely during the next BEAR market: A 40% correction that takes just over 4 years to get back to its old highs. Same question: How comfortable would you be to hold through this type of a correction? The red line represents a scenario like what happened in Japan in the late 1980s. A long term, greater than 50% correction! Not a high probability but one that is growing due to the stupid central bankers around the world! You see, the tough part of investing is we have no idea what type of correction (if any) we are entering. Therefore, you MUST have your strategy mapped out BEFORE something happens. Personally, I have always been more comfortable using methods akin to the TEAM strategy for entering and exiting investments. It eliminates the potential for the big mistake.
If this section made you think about your own investment philosophy then it accomplished its goal. If you want to chat about what you are thinking about please give me a call. About the author: Nick Foglietta is a Vice President, Investment Advisor at RBC Wealth Management in Nanaimo, B.C., Canada. He has been managing money since 1988. Securities or investment strategies mentioned in this newsletter may not be suitable for all investors or portfolios. The information contained in this newsletter is not intended as a recommendation directed to a particular investor or class of investors and is not intended as a recommendation in view of the particular circumstances of a specific investor, class of investors or a specific portfolio. You should not take any action with respect to any securities or investment strategy mentioned in this newsletter without first consulting your own investment advisor in order to ascertain whether the securities or investment strategy mentioned are suitable in your particular circumstances. This information is not a substitute for obtaining professional advice from your Investment Advisor. The commentary, opinions and conclusions, if any, included in this newsletter represent the personal and subjective view of the investment advisor who is not employed as an analyst and do not purport to represent the views of RBC Dominion Securities Inc. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable at the time obtained but neither RBC Dominion Securities Inc. nor its employees, agents, or information suppliers can guarantee its accuracy or completeness. This report is not and under no circumstances is to be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. This report is furnished on the basis and understanding that neither RBC Dominion Securities Inc. nor its employees, agents, or information suppliers is to be under any responsibility or liability whatsoever in respect thereof. RBC Dominion Securities Inc.* and Royal Bank of Canada are separate corporate entities which are affiliated. *Member Canadian Investor.