Donna Stewart, Director of Integrated Social Services and Rhonda McCauley, Social Housing Program Supervisor

Similar documents
4 PROVINCIAL CHILD CARE FEE SUBSIDY POLICY CHANGE: TREATMENT OF RRSPs AND RESPs

Guide to Rent-Geared-to-Income Assistance

SMAIR SERVICE MANAGER ANNUAL INFORMATION RETURN. Updated January 2014

SERVICE MANAGER ANNUAL INFORMATION RETURN INTRODUCTION

Could a housing benefit help tackle our affordable housing challenge?

Annual Statistical Report

Capital Planning Framework

Subject: Requesting Notice of Tax Assessment at the Annual Review

City Guideline Social Housing Arrears and Eligibility to apply for RGI

Household Composition Income & Assets Review

Housing Co-operative Inc. Housing Charge Subsidy By-law. By-law # 36. Date Approved by the Board of Directors: December 12, 2012

Developing a Strategy for Your Public Housing Stock: The Provincial Perspective. OMSSA Conference

Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador P. O. Box 8551, 20 Hallett Crescent St. John s, NL A1B 3P2

Comparing $10/day flat fees with income tested child care fees Petr Varmuza 11/24/2013

Welfare Rates Need To Be Raised

GST Guide. for Non-Profit Housing Providers. June 2016

Transitional Employment. Allowance POLICY MANUAL. October 2017

REDUCING POVERTY AND PROMOTING SOCIAL INCLUSION

Calculating Rent for a Partial Month Documenting RGI Rent Calculations... 30

Administration of Income Verification... 2

City Guideline : Factors to be used in 2018 Fiscal Year to Calculate Subsidies - Market & RGI

The Transitional Employment Allowance Regulations, 2005

Employment Rate Unemployment Rate Participation Rate 0% Q2 Q3 Q4 Q Q2 Q3 Q4 Q Most recent data 2015 Q1

RENT-GEARED-TO-INCOME (RGI) Important Rules for Your RGI Subsidy

Report to: General Committee Meeting Date: February 21 st, Shane Manson, Senior Manager, Revenue & Property Tax Ext. 7514

Application for Housing

Housing Division Notice Fluctuating Income Policy Appendix C Quarterly Reporting Statement (QRS)

2009 Human Services Budget Presentation to Council

Important Rules For Your Rent-Geared-To-Income Subsidy

Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Service Managers Housing Network

Report CS Child Care - Fee Subsidy Program - Discretionary Items

Vote Social Housing. RESPONSIBLE MINISTER FOR MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT: Minister for Social Development

January RGI Guide

Important Rules For Your Rent-Geared-To-Income Subsidy

United Way Centraide Canada. Supplemental Policy Paper. A Portable Housing Benefit

DEFINITION OF INCOME. Gross Household Income means the aggregate income of:

Update: City of Toronto Review of Mayor s Task Force Report Item 8 May 5, 2016 Building Investment, Finance and Audit Committee

Social Assistance Summaries. Yukon Territory 2017

C O N F I D E N T I A L

Quincy Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Homeownership Program Administrative Plan Amendment June 2006

INCOME SUPPORT, TRAINING AND HEALTH BENEFITS REGULATION

AFFORDABLE RENTAL OPPORTUNITY 32 Lisa Lane, Georgetown, MA

Chapter 6: Shelter Benefits (ix) Newfoundland & Labrador Housing Corporation

Ontario Works Policy Directives

Ministry of Finance Update

Canada and Ontario Sign Affordable Housing Program Agreement

ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN FOR THE HOMEOWNERSHIP PROGRAM. Housing Authority of the County of Riverside

OSAP Parent(s) Income Verification: Foreign and/or Non-Taxable Income

THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK

Pre-Budget Submission to the Honourable Scott Fielding, M.L.A. Minister of Finance Province of Manitoba

Housing Allowance Application

OSAP Parent Income Verification: Canadian Non-Taxable and/or Foreign Income

Make Poverty History Manitoba 432 Ellice Avenue, Winnipeg MB, R3B 1Y4, (204) ext 1230

CityHousing Hamilton Corporation BUDGET. CityHousing Hamilton Corporation Board of Directors

What does an actual housing allowance look like? Manitoba s Rent Assist program. Caledon Institute of Social Policy

REGION OF WATERLOO Ontario Renovates Program

Universal Credit claimant guide

National Coalition for Homeless Veterans. May 28, USDA Rural Development Housing Programs Community Facilities Programs

APPLICATION COVER SHEET

2013 Edition. Ontario Health Tax

Notice Number: 07-10

Tax Reduction and Social Policy Bill Part 1 - Tax Rate Reductions

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE CORPORATE SERVICES DEPARTMENT

OSAP Parent Income Verification: Foreign and/or Non-Taxable Income

Co-ordinator, Community Services Committee. Commissioner, Social Services Department UPDATE ON ONTARIO WORKS REGULATIONS

Section Social Programs 7 Program Social Assistance 13 Instructions SHELTER - RENT/MORTGAGE 5-1 Effective: June 1, 1994.

Tax Supported Preliminary Operating Budget. Book 1. Budget Summary Report FCS17001

SECTION 8 ADMINISTRATIVE PLAN APPENDIX E VOUCHER HOMEOWNERSHIP OPTION

Ensuring NAHMA Members Receive the Latest News and Analysis of Breaking Issues in Affordable Housing

June 20, 2011 ADVOCACY CENTRE FOR THE ELDERLY. Submission Contacts

Ministry of Seniors Affairs Program Guidelines. For The. Fire Sprinkler Retrofit Program For Licensed Small or Rural Retirement Homes

Procedure: Annual and Mid-year review (using a fixed review date) May 29, 2006

HUD Notice Soliciting Comments on ESG Interim Rule National Alliance to End Homelessness Summary of Notice June 25, 2015

1) NOTE: There is only one rental unit in this program. It is a single-family, threebedroom house, suitable for a family size of up to five people.

Social Housing Administration Directive No

STANDARD APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

Ontario Election Report Card A SUMMARY OF PARTY STANCES ON ISSUES AFFECTING FOOD BANK CLIENTS

Recommendations for Short Term Rule Changes For 2010

Delivering Dividends of a Strong Economy

Kelowna Vancouver Surrey Edmonton Calgary Regina Whitehorse Yellowknife WINTER 2017

Proposed TCHC Debt Management Policy and 2016 Infrastructure Ontario Mortgage Refinancing

Shelter Aid for Elderly Renters (SAFER) Application Form

Public Service Relocation and Employment Expenses Regulation

APPENDIX 1: HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND ASSET REVIEW FORM... 3

Federal Pre-Budget Consultation Submission to the Ministry of Finance

Ministry of Education Child Care Funding Formula and Framework. Qs & As March 2013

fact sheet Produced by policy

Social Housing: Issues and Solutions. Roger Maloney Vice-Chair Social Housing Services Corporation August 19,2007

CMHC / NOVA SCOTIA Agreement for Investment in Affordable Housing Extension and Social Infrastructure Fund REPORTING

CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL. Local Council Tax Reduction Scheme

Municipal Services Office Provincial Update April 19, 2018

Applying for rental housing with Manitoba Housing

Submission to the 2015 Ontario pre-budget consultations

Registered Savings VS Tax Free Savings

Adult is defined as either of the following: Related Terms: Dependent child.

State of New Mexico 2017 National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan

Income Support in Relation to Housing in Canada and Selected Other Countries: Final Synthesis Report

Administering CoC and ESG Rapid Re-housing Assistance

PROOF OF LEGAL STATUS IN CANADA FOR ALL PERSONS ON THE APPLICATION MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION.

Transcription:

Report To: From: Program Planning Committee Donna Stewart, Director of Integrated Social Services and Rhonda McCauley, Social Housing Program Supervisor Date: May 24, 2017 Re: Portable Housing Benefit Issue Report Purpose: The Ministry of Housing is proposing amendments to the Housing Services Regulations to allow Service System Managers to offer a portable form of housing assistance as an alternative to rent-geared-to-income assistance under that Act. Background: In a letter dated April 21, 2017, the Assistant Deputy Minister with the Ministry of Housing provided an update on the Provinces Framework for a portable Housing Benefit (PHB) which is an important component of the Long-Term Affordable Housing strategy. A Portable Housing Benefit would provide a monthly subsidy to low-to-moderate income households to assist with housing costs. Unlike RGI, the PHB would be tied to the household itself, instead of a physical housing unit. The PHB would have multiple benefits for recipients: It would give people on the social housing wait list a potential option to receive a portable benefit that would give them more flexibility and choice about where they live, perhaps closer to employment, child care, schools or family. It could help households who like where they are living but face affordability challenges to remain where they live. The calculation for the PHB would be simplified and reassessed annually using income tax information. As a result, recipients would have an incentive to earn income by moving to an annual benefit calculation, rather than experiencing an increased rent with every income change. 1

The PHB would also provide Service System Managers with the opportunity to create more vibrant mixed-income communities due to a greater ability to diversify their housing portfolio. The province provided a Summary of the Proposal and is currently collecting feedback in order that would establish the Portable Housing Benefit. The deadline for responses is June 5, 2017. Objectives Recent amendments to the Housing Services Act, 2011 (HSA) allow Service System Managers, at their discretion, to include a household to meet their rent-geared to income (RGI) housing obligations, known as service level standards, if they provide the household with an alternate form of financial housing assistance specified by regulation. The Ministry of Housing is soliciting feedback on proposed amendments to regulations setting out such an alternate form of assistance. The amendments would allow Service System Managers to include households that receive a portable housing benefit towards meeting their service level standards if they deliver it in accordance with a portable housing benefit framework set out in the regulation. The portable housing benefit would be Service Manager funded. Initial Eligibility & Selection Service System Managers would be required to select a household for an offer of a benefit only from households on the Service Manager s centralized waiting list, and from households not on the list who are occupying a unit and receiving RGI assistance inside the Service Manager s service area and have expressed an interest in receiving a benefit. Service System Managers would be required to select households in a manner that is consistent with the provincial priority rules and the Service Manager s priority rules. Households would not be obligated to accept an offer of a benefit. Households receiving RGI assistance would cease to be eligible for that assistance if they accept an offer of, and begin receiving, a benefit. Households on the waiting list that accept an offer of a benefit would be removed from the list unless the Service Manager is satisfied that there are extenuating circumstances. Service System Managers would be required to help households make an informed decision. 2

Portability Service System Managers could not require the portable housing benefit be used for a specific unit or a unit of a specific size. Benefit Calculation The formula for the benefit would be the difference between a minimum of 80% of the average market rent (AMR) for the Service Manager area based on Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation rent data for an appropriately sized unit based on household composition and 30% of the household s monthly Adjusted Family Net Income (AFNI), subject to certain adjustments. Adjusted Family Net Income is the sum of the Net Income of each member of the household that is 16 years old or older, excluding dependents attending secondary and post-secondary education. For social assistance recipients, the maximum portable housing benefit would be calculated using the same formula, but the actual benefit would be the difference between the social assistance shelter allowance received and actual shelter costs, up to the maximum allowable portable housing benefit amount. In certain circumstances, Service System Managers could propose other methods for determining local AMRs for the Minister s approval. Reviews Service System Managers would be required to assess a household for benefit assistance each year based on household AFNI verified through income tax information, household address and composition and the applicable average market rent. Following the review, Service System Managers would be required to adjust the benefit as necessary. Service System Managers may conduct in-year reviews only where the household requests an in-year adjustment for significant (minimum 20%) income decreases or a drop in income band, relocation outside Service Manager area or changes in household composition. Service System Managers may develop their own income verification methods for inyear reviews of households. Continuing Eligibility The household would cease to be eligible for the benefit if: the benefit calculation has given zero benefit to a household for 24 consecutive months; 3

a household has not filed a tax return in the prior year (unless the Service Manager is satisfied there are extenuating circumstances); or a household does not provide the Service Manager with information required for a review. Service System Managers could establish certain additional eligibility rules regarding the eligibility of a household or portion(s) of a household upon changes in household composition and for when a household no longer lives in the Service Manager s service area. Delivery Assistance would be paid directly to a single member of the household, unless the member requests that it be paid directly to the landlord. The benefit may either be delivered either using income bands or calculated individually for each household. Additional Flexibilities To allow Service System Managers additional flexibility in providing similar assistance that is not counted toward meeting service level standards, households receiving RGI assistance would cease to be eligible for that assistance if they accept an offer of, and begin receiving: a benefit as above that is not counted towards meeting service level standards; or, a benefit delivered in accordance with prescribed requirements except for the household selection rules. Households on the waiting list that accept an offer of such a benefit would be removed from the list unless the Service Manager is satisfied that there are extenuating circumstances. Conclusion The Manitoulin-Sudbury DSB Board and staff recommend to the province: That the province ensure significant flexibility is available to the Service System Managers to calculate the Portable Housing Benefit to meet the needs of their community members. A one size fits all solution will not work in Northern, Remote and/or Rural Ontario. To avoid system complexity, the Portable Housing Benefit should be exempt as income from Social Assistance, and if necessary, reconciled within the Portable Housing Benefit system. 4

The province should not impose a time limit to the Portable Housing Benefit. o This could impose unintended penalty upon the household. Currently RGI assistance is not time limited and any move to impose a time limit on the Portable Housing Benefit would discourage current RGI tenants from considering a move to private accommodations freeing up RGI units for others in need. Staff could not, in good conscious, recommend that a household move out of RGI housing to a private accommodation knowing full well that the Portable Housing Benefit was time limited and could leave the household worse off in the end. Payments to landlords should only be made by exception, and for a pre-determined timeframe to support the Household in becoming self-sufficient. Service System Managers should have the ability to calculate Adjusted Family Net Income based on other means besides Income Tax system. This strict condition could lead to eligibility issues and impose financial hardship on families reliant upon the PHB, and could result in homelessness. The Adjusted Family Net Income of all family members over the age of 16 is proposed for the Portable Housing Benefit. Consideration should be given to adopting the same income rules used in RGI calculations for members over the age of 16. This would alleviate the potential of penalizing students who are saving to attend post-secondary education. 5