Making the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Individual Income Tax Provisions Permanent

Similar documents
Details and Analysis of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Preliminary Details and Analysis of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

FISCAL FACT No. 516 July, 2016 Director of Federal Projects Key Findings Embargoed

Preliminary Details and Analysis of the Senate s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

The Positive Economic Growth Effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

2019 Tax Brackets. FISCAL FACT No. 624 Nov Amir El-Sibaie

2018 Tax Brackets. Income Tax Brackets and Rates FISCAL FACT. Amir El-Sibaie. Table 1. Unmarried Individuals, Tax Brackets and Rates, 2018

Summary of the Latest Federal Income Tax Data, 2018 Update

Summary of the Latest Federal Income Tax Data, 2017 Update

Evaluating the Economic Impact of Additional Government Infrastructure Spending

Details and Analysis of Donald Trump s Tax Plan

A Comparison of the Tax Burden on Labor in the OECD, 2017

Summary of Latest Federal Income Tax Data

TCJA Individual Tax Provisions and the States

District of Columbia. Summary of the Effects of Major Provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on District Residents and Businesses

State Revenue Implications of Federal Tax Reform. Keith Richardson Deputy Chief Financial Officer District of Columbia Office of Tax and Revenue

The Fixtures Fix: Correcting the Drafting Error Involving the Expensing of Qualified Improvement Property. Key Findings. FISCAL FACT No.

Brackets (seven) - Taxable Income Single Filers. Between $9,525 and $38,700. Between $2,550 and $9,150. Between $157,500 and $200,000

Getting Real with Capital Gains Taxes by Adjusting for Inflation

Assessing the Impact of Tax Reform on Illustrative New Jersey Homeowners

Why Temporary Corporate Income Tax Cuts Won t Generate Much Growth

How Lower Corporate Tax Rates Lead to Higher Worker Wages

PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE FAMILY FAIRNESS AND OPPORTUNITY TAX REFORM ACT

Special Report. Using Dynamic Analysis Makes Tax Reform 30 Percent Less Challenging. Key Findings. August 2013 No. 210

Distributional Impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets for 2019

Federal Tax Reform: The Impact on States

Options for Broadening the U.S. Tax Base

A Dynamic Analysis of President Obama s Tax Initiatives

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)

Tax Cuts & Jobs Act W H AT B U S I N E S S E S & I N D I V I D U A L S N E E D T O K N O W D E C E M B E R 1 2, 2018

Capital Cost Recovery across the OECD, 2018

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Five scenarios

The Distribution of Federal Taxes, Jeffrey Rohaly

A Hybrid Approach: The Treatment of Foreign Profits under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

UPDATED EFFECTS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT ON REPRESENTATIVE FAMILIES

Tax Freedom Day 2019 is April 16th

Updated Tables for Using a VAT to Reform the Income Tax

An Overview of the 2017 Tax Legislation: Impact to Individuals! Prepared by First Foundation Advisors December 2017!!!!!!!!!!

Tax Reform Isn t Done

Tax Freedom Day 2018 is April 19th

Tax Reform and its Impact on Individuals and Businesses

Changes in Refundable Tax Credits

2018 TAX REFORM WORKSHOP

TAX REFORM SIGNED INTO LAW

State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets for 2018

How Do the Presidential Candidates Tax Plans Affect Taxpayers Marginal Tax Rates?

An Analysis of the 2004 House Tax Cuts. Leonard E. Burman 1 The Urban Institute and The Tax Policy Center. June 2004

Summary of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

Executive Summary. Effects of the Federal Tax Law on the State of Maryland Page 1 of 41

DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE

Modeling the Estate Tax Proposals of 2016

Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017

WHAT TAX REFORM MEANS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES & PASS-THROUGH ENTITIES. Julie Peters, Attorney Polston Tax Resolution & Accounting

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Impact on Individual Taxpayers

PRELIMINARY DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Prepared by Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc.

Prepared Testimony for the Connecticut Joint Committee on Finance, Revenue, and Bonding

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2016

Here are some of the key items in the tax reform bill that affect individuals:

H.R. 1 TAX CUT AND JOBS ACT. By: Michelle McCarthy, Esq. and Tyler Murray, Esq.

ESTATE TAXES, DEFICITS, AND BUDGET IMPLICATIONS

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2018

The Complicated Taxation of America s Retirement Accounts

AAO Board of Trustees and Council on Government Affairs. Analysis of New Tax Reform Law

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

I S S U E B R I E F PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE PPI PRESIDENT BUSH S TAX PLAN: IMPACTS ON AGE AND INCOME GROUPS

What the Tax Reform Act Means for You

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

ESTATE TAXES, DEFICITS and BUDGET IMPLICATIONS

The Impact of Federal Tax Reform on the States

Government Affairs. The White Papers TAX REFORM.

TAX BULLETIN DECEMBER 6, 2017

INCOME TAX PLANNING FOR INDIVIDUALS, TRUSTS AND ESTATES: EFFECTS OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT (TCJA)*

Impact of 2017 Tax Act on Individuals. From The Editors

Our Tax System Revealed. Lee R. Nackman, Ph.D. October 24, 2018

Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (TCJA)

THE TAX REFORM TRADEOFF: ELIMINATING TAX EXPENDITURES, REDUCING RATES

ROBINSON, FARMER, COX ASSOCIATES

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) Key Individual Tax Provisions

Contrary to Fair Share Claims, Businesses are Central to Tax Collection Systems

Written Testimony of Scott A. Hodge, President, Tax Foundation

Senator Kerry s Tax Proposals. Leonard E. Burman and Jeffrey Rohaly 1 Revised July 23, 2004

EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS & THE NEW TAX BILL Changes and implications you should understand

Tax Update for 2018 and 2019

Dynamic Analysis of EITC Expansion

Individual Taxes. TAX CUTS & JOBS ACT OF Tax Brackets: 7 Tax Brackets: 7 Tax Brackets: 4 Tax Brackets:

THE INDIVIDUAL ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX: HISTORICAL DATA

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Impact on Individuals

Biggest tax bill in 30+ years redefines tax landscape

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017: What Taxpayers Need to Know Presented by Shabri Moore

MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE TAX REFORM ACT OF 2014

HB 2456: A Change in the Tax Base

Tax Reform Side by Side

SPECIAL REPORT. Tax Law Essentials. Brought to you by Mercer Advisors

TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT SUMMARY

The Debate over Expiring Tax Cuts: What about the Deficit? Adam Looney

Corporate Income Tax Rates around the World, 2018

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2017

ISSUE BRIEF. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is the most sweeping. Analysis of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Adam N. Michel

Transcription:

FISCAL FACT No. 597 July 2018 Making the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Individual Income Tax Provisions Permanent Nicole Kaeding Director of Special Projects Key Findings Kyle Pomerleau Economist and Director, Center for Quantitative Analysis Alex Muresianu Research Assistant The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) significantly lowered individual income tax rates and made aspects of the individual income tax code simpler primarily by reducing the attractiveness of itemizing deductions. These individual tax code provisions are all scheduled to expire at the end of 2025. If extended, these provisions would increase long-run GDP by 2.2 percent, long-run wages by 0.9 percent, and add 1.5 million full-time equivalent jobs. If extended, these provisions would decrease federal revenue on a static basis by $638 billion over the 2019-2028 budget window, while on a dynamic basis, extending these provisions would lead to a loss of $576 billion in revenue over the same window. In the long run these provisions would reduce federal revenue by $165 billion annually on a conventional basis and $112 billion dynamically. The distributional impact of making the individual side of the TCJA permanent would mean a roughly 1.5 percent increase in after-tax income for every income quintile. The Tax Foundation is the nation s leading independent tax policy research organization. Since 1937, our research, analysis, and experts have informed smarter tax policy at the federal, state, and local levels. We are a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. 2018 Tax Foundation Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 4.0 Editor, Rachel Shuster Designer, Dan Carvajal Tax Foundation 1325 G Street, NW, Suite 950 Washington, DC 20005 202.464.6200 taxfoundation.org

Introduction TAX FOUNDATION 2 The TCJA featured, on the individual income tax side, broad marginal rate cuts and the curbing or elimination of several deductions, along with the expansion of some tax credits. Some of the most prominent changes in the TCJA: the top income tax bracket rate went from 39.6 percent to 37 percent; the standard deduction was doubled; both the state and local tax deduction and the mortgage interest deduction were capped; the personal exemption was eliminated; the child tax credit was doubled. The outcome of these changes has been to lower the tax rate on labor and to push filers towards choosing the standard deduction instead of itemizing, which means the process of tax filing will be much simpler. However, all these provisions are scheduled to expire in 2025. If the current iteration of TCJA goes unchanged and these parts of the bill are allowed to expire, then households will see higher tax rates and a more complicated filing system when they file their taxes in 2026. This paper will consider the economic, revenue, and distributional impacts of making these provisions permanent. Growth Impact Making the TCJA s expiring individual tax code changes permanent would result in a larger economy in the long run. The increase in long-run size of the economy would predominantly be thanks to making the lower marginal income tax rates permanent and increasing incentives to work and invest. 1 According to the Tax Foundation Taxes and Growth (TAG) model, making these provisions permanent would have a small, positive impact on the economy during the 2019 to 2028 budget window. The growth impact of expansion is limited, due to the extension s timing. The provisions are currently in effect through 2025, meaning that only three years of extension are being captured in the budget window. The economic benefits from making these provisions permanent are found in the long run, as the impacts of tax reform take several years to being fully realized. In the long run, making all individual tax provisions permanent will lead to 2.2 percent higher long-run GDP, 0.9 percent higher wages, and 1.5 million more full-time equivalent jobs. TABLE 1. The Long-Run Impact of Making the TCJA Individual Provisions Permanent Long-Run GDP +2.2% Wages +0.9% Jobs Source: Tax Foundation Taxes and Growth Model, April 2018 +1.5 million 1 The extension of the Section 199A pass-through deduction would be pro-growth, but arguably reforms to the deduction s structure would be more beneficial. For more information, see Scott Greenberg and Nicole Kaeding, Reforming the Pass-Through Deduction, Tax Foundation, June 21, 2018, https:// taxfoundation.org/reforming-pass-through-deduction-199a.

Revenue Impact TAX FOUNDATION 3 Making these provisions of the TCJA permanent would decrease revenue both in the short run and long run. During the 2019 to 2028 budget window, making the provisions permanent would lead to a loss in revenue of $638 billion. However, it is important to note that those losses in revenue, while measured in a 10-year budget window, are only in the last three years of that 2019 to 2028 window. On a dynamic basis in the 10-year budget window, the revenue losses would be smaller than the revenue losses measured in a static model. Thanks to added economic growth in that budget window, there would be $62.1 billion in dynamic revenue reflow; however, that would be insufficient to fully offset the revenue loss from extension. From 2019 to 2028, extending the provisions would reduce federal revenues by $575.9 billion on a dynamic basis. In the long run, revenue would also decrease. Federal revenues would be $165.8 billion lower annually on a static basis. However, thanks to the larger economy from the tax cuts, revenues would only decrease by $112.8 billion on a dynamic basis, reducing the cost of extension by about 30 percent. 2 2 This is the primary deficit impact and does not include the additional interest on the debt that would be accumulated.

TAX FOUNDATION 4 TABLE 2. 10-Year Revenue Impacts of Extension by Provision (2019 to 2028) 10%, 12%, 22%, 24%, 32%, 35%, and 37% income tax rate brackets Modify standard deduction ($12,000 for singles, $24,000 for married filing jointly, $18,000 for HoH) 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2019-2028 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-167.7-185.1-200.0-552.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-114.5-125.7-134.5-374.7 Repeal of deduction for personal exemptions Allow 20 percent deduction of qualified business income and certain dividends for individuals and for gross income of agricultural or horticultural cooperatives Modification of child tax credit: $2,000 not indexed; refundable up to $1,400 indexed down to nearest $100, base year 2018; $2,500 refundability threshold not indexed; $500 other dependents not indexed; phaseouts $200K/$400K not indexed Repeal of itemized deductions for taxes not paid or accrued in a trade or business (except for up to $10,000 in state and local taxes), interest on equity debt, nondisaster casualty losses, and certain miscellaneous expenses Increase the Individual AMT Exemption Amounts and Phaseout Thresholds 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 180.6 197.9 210.5 589.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-31.2-34.2-36.7-102.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-87.1-92.7-93.5-273.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 110.1 122.0 132.3 364.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-87.5-96.5-104.3-288.4 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-197.3-214.5-226.3-638.1 Dynamic Revenue 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 20.8 34.5 62.1 Total Dynamic 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-190.3-193.7-191.8-575.9 Source: Taxes and Growth Model, April 2018

TAX FOUNDATION 5 Distributional Impact Making the individual income tax provisions of the TCJA permanent would increase after-tax incomes by 1.6 percent on average. 3 Taxpayers in the bottom four income quintiles (0 to 20%, 20% to 40%, 40% to 60%, and 60% to 80%) would see an increase in after-tax income between 1.2 percent and 1.6 percent. The top 1 percent of earners would only see an increase of 1.2 percent. Others at the very high end of the income distribution, those between the 95th and 99th percentiles, would see their incomes increase by 2.4 percent. This outlier is predominantly due to the pass-through business income deduction and the reduction in the Alternative Minimum Tax. Income Group Conventional Distributional Impact 0% to 20% +1.2% 20% to40% +1.6% 40% to 60% +1.4% 60% to 80% +1.6% 80% to100% +1.5% 80%to 90% +1.4% 90% to 95% +1.4% 95% to 99% +2.4% 99% to 100% +1.2% Total +1.6% Source: Taxes and Growth Model, April 2018 Conclusion Making the individual income tax provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent would increase the long-run size of the economy. In the long run, increased incentives to work and invest translates into a 2.2 percent larger economy, 0.9 percent higher wages, and 1.5 million full-time equivalent jobs. Making these provisions permanent will also increase the deficit, reducing federal revenues by $638 billion ($575 billion on a dynamic basis) over the 10-year budget window and in the long run, reduce federal revenue on an annual basis by $165 billion ($112 billion on a dynamic basis). 4 The distributional impact of making these provisions permanent would be approximately proportional across income quintiles. Ultimately, making individual income tax provisions from the TCJA permanent would make the TCJA a much more beneficial long-term policy in terms of the size of the economy, although it would also further reduce federal revenue. 3 The income (adjusted gross income) breakpoints in 2018: 0% to 20%: <$15,344, 20% to 40%: $15,344 - $27,750, 40% to 60%: $27,750 - $43,800, 60% to 80%: $43,800 - $70,168, 80% to 100%: >$70,168, 80% to 90%: $70,168 - $99,773, 90% to 95%: $99,773 - $139,936, 95% to 99%: $139,936 - $345,877, 99% to 100%: >$345,877. 4 Long-run revenue estimates in 2019 dollars

Methodology and Modeling Notes TAX FOUNDATION 6 The Tax Foundation uses its General Equilibrium Model to simulate the effects of government tax and spending policies on the economy and on government revenues and budgets. The model can produce both conventional and dynamic estimates of tax policy. 5 There are two primary sources of uncertainty in modeling the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: the significance of deficit effects and the timing of economic effects. Some economic models assume that there is a limited amount of saving available to the United States to fund new investment opportunities when taxes on investment are reduced, and that when the federal budget deficit increases, the amount of available saving for private investment is crowded out by government borrowing, which reduces the long-run size of the U.S. economy. While past empirical work has found evidence of crowd-out, the estimated impact is usually small. Furthermore, global saving remains high, which may explain why interest rates remain low despite rising budget deficits. We assume that global saving is available to assist in the expansion of U.S. investment, and that a modest deficit increase will not meaningfully crowd out private investment in the United States. We are also forced to make certain assumptions about how quickly the economy would respond to lower tax burdens on investment. There is an inherent level of uncertainty here that could impact the timing of revenue generation within the budget window. 5 Stephen J. Entin, Huaqun Li, and Kyle Pomerleau, Overview of the Tax Foundation s General Equilibrium Model, April 2018 Update, Tax Foundation, https:// files.taxfoundation.org/20180419195810/taxfoundaton_general-equilibrium-model-overview1.pdf.