REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL PROPOSED REVISIONS TO MOBILHOME RENT STABILIZATION ORDINANCE

Similar documents
REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

2. e Concord REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BELMONT ADDING CHAPTER 32 (MINIMUM WAGE) TO THE BELMONT CITY CODE

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA 90755

Staff Report. Elia Bamberger, Director of Human Resources

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No Key Words: Council Compensation Meeting Date: December 9, 2014 PREPARED BY:

Richard Pearson, Community Development Director Tim Tucker, City Engineer

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

RESOLUTION NO

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

Agenda Item D.1 DISCUSSION ACTION ITEM Meeting Date: April 7, 2015

Item No. 14 Town of Atherton

ORDINANCE NO OF THE CITY OF COLBY, KANSAS

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1104

CITY OF HEALDSBURG RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1174

ORDINANCE N N.S.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND. FROM: Toni J. Taber, CM1 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. DATE: November 5, Approval of Adjusted Campaign Contribution Limits.

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION NO ESTABLISHING THE CONCORD TOURISM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

MEMORANDUM DEBORAH MALICOAT, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

City of Placerville M E M O R A N D U M BIENNIAL CONFIRMATION OF THE CITY OF PLACERVILLE S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Item No. 29 Town of Atherton

ORDINANCE NO Section 1. The City Council finds the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

Council Agenda Report

RESOLUTION NO

VILLAGE OF RICHTON PARK COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO.

( Council Agenda Report

Citv Council Staff Report

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 39 OF THE LAKE FOREST CITY CODE TO ADOPT A DEMOLITION TAX

ORDINANCE NO. 17-O-2 NORTHBROOK PARK DISTRICT * * *

Council Agenda Report

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

2. fl Concord REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL/AGENCY BOARD

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

CERTIFICATION ORDINANCE Amended Appropriation Ordinance

CHAPTER 244 FORECLOSURE AND REDEMPTION OF MORTGAGES*

ORDINANCE NO. CID-3193

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3415

& Companion Fee Resolution Mayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission

INFRASTRUCTURE & FRANCHISE

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1107

CITY OF ROMULUS CHAPTER 39: PURCHASING

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 8

WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was duly given as required by Section of the Act or has been duly waived by the property owner; and

NOTICE AND CALL OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE KERMAN CITY COUNCIL. The sole business to be conducted is as follows:

CARMEN A. TRUT ANICH City Attorney REPORTRE:

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3305

2018 Property Tax Levy $28,699, Estimated Property Tax Levy $30,200,000 FINANCIAL IMPACT:

RESOLUTION NUMBER RDA 292

BUDGET AND APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE FISCAL YEAR ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, on September 14, 2004, the Board of Supervisors (the Board of

EGG HARBOR TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE

CA: RMM: rmd254/hpca City Council Meeting Santa Monica, California RESOLUTION NUMBER 7231(CCS) (City Council Series)

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

AGENDA REQUEST. Consent Agenda No. 2. March 20, 2017 SUBJECT:

ORDINANCE NO N.S.

City of Crescent City Measure Q City Attorney s Impartial Analysis of Measure Q

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City anticipates revising its SDCs in light of growth trends and infrastructure needs within the next two years.

Litten, O' Leary, O' Malley, Rader. AN ORDINANCE to take effect on such date that the municipal income tax provisions of

#17. July 27, 2010 MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF FREEPORT STEPHENSON COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE (0% TAX LEVY)

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. The Mayor and Members of the City Council

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. Key Words: Marijuana Tax Meeting Date: April 26, 2016 PREPARED BY: Douglas L. White, City Attorney

February 23, 2016 Agenda Item XI.1: Page 1

RESOLUTION NO

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

NAME OF MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY LINCOLN & 394 CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE ZONE ORDINANCE NUMBER

NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED

This chapter shall be known as and may be cited as "the lodgers' tax ordinance."

RESOLUTION NO

FINDINGS. The Board of Supervisors finds that: Resolution No declaring its intention to form Community Facilities District No.

Office of the Chicago City Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4778

DEPARTMENITT~~;J~~~~~~--

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

AGENDA REQUEST. Legislative Public Hearings. December 5, 2016 SUBJECT:

Carla Hansen, Management Analyst II Peggy Flynn, Public Communications Coordinator Cathy Capriola, Assistant City Manager

ORDINANCE NO. 15,034

An ordinance authorizing the employment of personnel in the Office of the Controller of the City of Los Angeles.

RESOLUTION NO A regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners of Broward County, Florida

MARCH 5, Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing workers compensation.

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING CITY OF HALF MOON BAY TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, :30 PM

WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted an annual evaluation of the City Manager, David Brandt; and

SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY ORDINANCE NO. WAO- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY CODE

TITLE 5 MUNICIPAL FINANCE AND TAXATION 1 CHAPTER 1 PRIVILEGE TAXES

March 10, 2015 XII.2: Page 1

REPORT TO MAYOR/AGENCY CHAIR AND COUNCIL/AGENCYMEMBERS

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING REVISIONS TO COUNCIL POLICY 1-15 RELATING TO DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

ORDINANCE NO Project

EMERGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 362 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION OF THE HANNA MUNICIPAL CODE CLARIFYING WATER CONSUMPTION RATE INCREASES.

Transcription:

AGENDA ITEM NO. 5.a REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL: DATE: SUBJECT: PROPOSED REVISIONS TO MOBILHOME RENT STABILIZATION ORDINANCE Report in Brief The purpose of this report is to recommend revisions to the City of Concord s Mobilehome Rent Stabilization Ordinance clarifying language in the Ordinance determining how Base Year Net Operating Income is calculated for purposes of a Special Rent Increase request. Additionally, staff recommends revisions to the Ordinance underscoring that Special Rent Increases may only be assessed on a prospective basis. Background a. Calculation of Base Year Net Operating Income Under the City s Mobilehome Rent Stabilization Ordinance (Concord Municipal Code Sections 58-91 through 58-128), park owners are entitled to assess residents a yearly space rent increase, referred to as a General Annual Adjustment, equal to the lesser of 80 percent of the increase in the Bay Area Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the 12 month period ending 90 days before the Notice of Rent Increase is given, or 5 percent. The ordinance encompasses a Maintenance of Net Operating Income formula, which assumes that with General Annual Adjustments, park owners will continue to receive the same Net Operating Income ( NOI ) that they received when the Mobilehome Rent Stabilization Ordinance was first adopted in 1993, which is referred to in the Ordinance as the Base Year. In the initial version of the Ordinance, the allowable General Annual Adjustment was 60 percent of the relevant CPI increase; however, in 2008 that figure was increased to 80 percent on a going forward basis. In addition to General Annual Adjustments, park owners are allowed to assess a Special Rent Increase, if that increase meets the criteria set forth in the Ordinance. In late fall 2011, the owners of the Dalis Gardens Mobilehome Park filed a notice of a proposed Special Rent Increase in the amount of $61.54 per space. Reduced to essentials, Dalis Gardens owner, Santiago Homes, asserted that notwithstanding the General Annual Adjustments it has assessed over the years, it was receiving less in Net Operating Income than it received in 1993, due to increases in allowable expenses. The park owner asserted that the Special Rent Increase that it was proposing was necessary to remedy this shortfall. In February 2012, a Special Rent Increase hearing was conducted to determine whether Dalis Gardens proposed Special Rent Increase should be allowed. Presiding over the hearing was the Honorable

Page 2 James Trembath, a retired Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge who had been mutually selected by the park owners and the residents from a list of potential hearing officers assembled by City staff. As one component of the Special Rent Increase determination, Judge Trembath was required to evaluate the NOI to which Dalis Gardens is entitled. This process required him to calculate the adjustments to Base Year NOI permitted as a result of General Annual Adjustments assessed in the period since the Ordinance was first adopted. During this aspect of the proceedings, questions were raised as to whether, in determining allowable NOI, the 2008 increase in allowable General Annual Adjustments should be applied retroactively, extending back to the adoption of the Mobilehome Rent Stabilization Ordinance in 1993, or only for the period from 2008 forward. Although Judge Trembath ultimately ruled against retroactive application of the 2008 General Annual Adjustment increase, staff believes that the ordinance should be revised to clarify and confirm that in calculating adjustments to Base Year NOI, the increase in General Annual Adjustments adopted in 2008 should be incorporated only from 2008 forward. b. Clarifying When Special Rent Increases Take Effect As part of the 2008 revisions to the Ordinance, Council approved a new provision, Section 58-102, making clear that Special Rent Increases should only be permitted on a going forward basis, and not applied retroactively. With respect to the Special Rent Increase sought by the Dalis Gardens owners, the hearing concluded on February 21, 2012; however, Judge Trembath did not issue his Final Order until October 11, 2012. 1 In his order, Judge Trembath allowed an increase of $56.66 ($4.88 less than the sum sought by Dalis Gardens). Despite the language of the Ordinance, however, Judge Trembath made that order retroactive to February 21, 2012, when the hearing ended. Because the Special Rent Increase was retroactively imposed, the residents are now required to pay a lump sum of back rent of at least $400, in addition to the monthly rent increase they must pay on a going forward basis. In order to avoid future misapplications of the Ordinance, staff recommends tightening up the language of Section 58-102 so that there is absolutely no room for a hearing officer to conclude that Special Rent Increases can be applied other than on a going forward basis. Discussion In 2008, Section 58-95 of the Concord Municipal Code was amended to increase allowable General Annual Adjustments from 60 to 80 percent of the relevant CPI. That section (re-numbered as Section 58-94) now reads as follows: Sec. 58-94 General adjustment of rent authorized; amount.... (b) Once every 12 months, the park owner shall be permitted to increase the rent on mobile home spaces covered by this division 80 percent of the percentage increase of the CPI for the 12-month period ending 90 days before such notice of rent increase is given; provided, however, that the annual automatic increase shall be no more than five percent of the base rent charged prior to the increase. 1 The delay was due to an extended post-hearing briefing schedule agreed to by the parties, followed by a considerable amount of time taken by Judge Trembath before he issued his Final Order.

Page 3 Corresponding changes were made to Section 58-120(a) of the Ordinance. The original version of that Section read: Sec. 58-120 Calculation of Fair and Reasonable Return for Special Rent Increase. (a) It shall be presumed that the base year net operating income adjusted by 60 percent of the percentage increase or decrease or decrease in the Consumer Price Index since the base year yields a fair return. The Board shall make a determination whether the park owner will receive a fair return under this standard. 2 In tandem with the language increasing the allowable General Annual Adjustments from 60 to 80 percent of the relevant CPI increase, Council amended Section 58-120 as follows: Sec. 58-121. Calculation of fair and reasonable return for special rent increase. 3 (a) It shall be presumed that the base year net operating income adjusted by general annual adjustments of rent since the base year yields a fair return. The Hearing Officer shall make a determination whether the park owner will receive a fair return under this standard. The intention of Staff and the Council, when the 2008 revisions were made, was that for purposes of determining adjustments to Base Year Net operating income, this language captured the two levels of permitted General Annual Adjustment amounts: 60 percent from 1993 to 2008, and 80 percent thereafter. Given the dispute over the meaning of this provision evidenced at the Dalis Gardens Special Rent Increase Hearing, Staff recommends clarifying this provision as follows: Sec. 58-121. Calculation of fair and reasonable return for special rent increase (a) It shall be presumed that the base year net operating income annually adjusted by (1) sixty percent of the increase in the consumer price index between the Base Year and December 31, 2008, and (2) eighty percent of the annual increase in the consumer price index between January 1, 2009 and the present yields a fair return. The Hearing Officer shall make a determination whether the park owner will receive a fair return under this standard. With respect to the related issue of when a Special Rent Increase takes effect, Concord Municipal Code Section 58-102 was drafted to only permit Special Rent Increases on a prospective basis. CMC Section 58-102 provides: Sec. 58-102. Same--Effective date of rent increases. In the event that a petition [seeking a Special Rent Increase Hearing] is properly and timely filed by mobile home owners pursuant to section 58-98, that portion of a requested rental increase (and only that portion) which exceeds the 80 percent increase in CPI limitation described in this division or five percent, whichever is less, shall not take effect unless and 2 In the original version of the Ordinance, Special Rent Increase determinations were made by the Mobilehome Rent Review Board. In the 2008 amendment to the Ordinance, the Board was eliminated, and replaced by a third party hearing officer. 3 As part of the 2008 revisions, Section 58-120 was renumbered to Section 58-121

Page 4 until such time as such increase or portion thereof is allowed after hearing pursuant to the provisions of this division. (emphasis added) As noted above, in the Dalis Gardens matter, Hearing Officer James Trembath did not issue his Final Order until October 11, 2012, yet he retroactively applied that increase to commence on February 21, 2012, the final date of the hearing. Staff believes that this aspect of Judge Trembath s ruling was erroneous, since the increase wasn t allowed (approved) until the date his Final Award was issued, 8 months after the hearing. To prevent future misapplications of this section, staff recommends the following revision to Section 58-102: Fiscal Impact Sec. 58-102. Same--Effective date of rent increases. In the event that a petition is properly and timely filed by mobile home owners pursuant to section 58-98, that portion of a requested rental increase (and only that portion) which exceeds the 80 percent increase in CPI limitation described in this division or five percent, whichever is less, shall not be applied retroactively, and shall not take effect unless and until such time as such increase or portion thereof is allowed after hearing and following issuance of the Hearing Officer s final order pursuant to the provisions of this division, unless otherwise required by law. 4 The proposed ordinance revisions will not have any fiscal impact to the City. Public Contact The agenda has been posted as required by law. A copy of the agenda and this report has also been provided to the managers/owners all of the City s mobilehome parks, as well as the resident representatives at each of those parks. Alternative Courses of Action 1. Adopt suggested revisions to Concord s Mobilehome Rent Stabilization Ordinance. 2. Adopt alternative revisions to Concord s Mobilehome Rent Stabilization Ordinance. 3. Retain present version of Concord s Mobilehome Rent Stabilization Ordinance. 4 Under certain circumstances California courts have allowed retroactive application of special rent increases. Such rulings have largely been limited to cases in which the involved agency has acted unreasonably, such as by improperly denying a special rent increase at the outset, or otherwise engaging in violations of the substantive due process rights of a mobilehome park owner. (Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd., (1997) 16 Cal 4 th 1761; Galland v. City of Clovis (2001) 24 Cal. 4 th 1003.) For this reason, staff believes that it is prudent to include the unless otherwise required by law language in the proposed ordinance revision.

Page 5 Recommendation for Action Staff recommends that the City Council introduce Ordinance No. 12-6, revising Concord Municipal Code Chapter 58, Article II, Sections 58-102 and 58-121 as described in this report, by reading of the title only and waiving further readings. Prepared by: Mark S. Coon City Attorney Mark.Coon@cityofconcord.org Valerie J. Barone Interim City Manager Valerie.Barone@cityofconcord.org Attachment A: Ordinance No. 12-6 - Proposed Revisions to Concord Municipal Code Sections 58-102 and 58-121.

Attachment A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDINANCE NO. 12-6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 58, ARTICLE II (MOBILE HOME PARKS), DIVISION 3 (RENT STABILIZATION), SECTIONS 58-102 (EFFECTIVE DATE OF RENT INCREASES) AND 58-121 (CALCULATION OF FAIR AND REASONABLE RETURN FOR RENT INCREASE) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Concord Municipal Code Chapter 58, Article II, Division 3, Sections 58-102 and 58-121 are hereby amended to read as follows: ARTICLE II. MOBILE HOME PARKS Sec. 58-102. Same--Effective date of rent increases. In the event that a petition is properly and timely filed by mobile home owners pursuant to section 58-98, that portion of a requested rental increase (and only that portion) which exceeds the 80 percent increase in CPI limitation described in this division or five percent, whichever is less, shall not take effect unless and until such time as such increase or portion thereof is allowed after hearing and following issuance of the Hearing Officer s Final Order pursuant to the provisions of this division, unless otherwise required by law. Sec. 58-121. Calculation of fair and reasonable return for special rent increase. (a) It shall be presumed that the base year net operating income adjusted by (1) sixty percent of the annual increase in the Consumer Price Index between the Base Year and December 31, 2008, and (2) eighty percent of the annual increase in the consumer price index between January 1, 2009 and the present yields a fair return. The Hearing Officer shall make a determination whether the park owner will receive a fair return under this standard. 22 (b) Base year Consumer Price Index shall be the CPI level in the sixth month of the 23 24 25 base year. The applicable percentage increase or decrease in the Consumer Price Index shall be determined by comparing the base year CPI with the CPI level on the filing date of the current owner petition. 26 (c) In evaluating whether or not the park owners are receiving a fair return on their 27 investment, the Hearing Officer shall consider other relevant factors without limitation. 28 // Ord. No. 12-6 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Section 2. This Ordinance No. 12-6 shall become effective thirty (30) days following its passage and adoption. In the event a summary of said Ordinance is published in lieu of the entire Ordinance, a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to its adoption and within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, including the vote of the Councilmembers. Additionally, a summary prepared by the City Attorney s Office shall be published once at least five (5) days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance and once within fifteen (15) days after its passage and adoption, including the vote of the Councilmembers, in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Concord. 10 11 12 13 14 ATTEST: Mary Rae Lehman, CMC City Clerk (Seal) Mayor 15 16 Ordinance No. 12-6 was duly and regularly introduced at a regular joint meeting of the City Council held on, and was thereafter duly and regularly passed and adopted at a 17 18 19 20 21 22 regular joint meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency held on January the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers ABSENT: Councilmembers, 2013, by 23 24 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an ordinance duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Concord, California. 25 26 27 Mary Rae Lehman City Clerk 28 Ord. No. 12-6 2