G20 High-Level Principles on Beneficial Owner Transparency (SPAIN)

Similar documents
Module 3 TOOLS FOR TRANSPARENCY

FRANCE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP TRANSPARENCY

Consultation Paper. The Review of the Standards Preparation for the 4 th Round of Mutual Evaluation. Second public consultation

Financial Crime update. 12 September 2017

BRAZIL BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP TRANSPARENCY

CONSULTATION PAPER NO.120

CYPRUS BAR ASSOCIATION

Improving Global AML/CFT Compliance: Ongoing Process - 19 October 2018

International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of. The FATF Recommendations

Executive Summary. A. Key Findings

SWITZERLAND BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP TRANSPARENCY

FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE. Mutual Evaluation Fourth Follow-Up Report. Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism SPAIN

EU-Mexico Free Trade Agreement EU TEXTUAL PROPOSAL. Anti-corruption provisions

Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) (Amendment) Act 2018

Austria. Follow-up report. Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures

AML/CTF and Sanctions Policy

CONSULTATION PAPER NO JUNE 2016 PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING, COUNTER- TERRORIST FINANCING AND SANCTIONS MODULE

SUMMARY Seychelles National Risk Assessment Report for Money Laundering & Terrorist Financing 2017

CONSULTATION PAPER P June Proposed Amendments To The Monetary Authority Of Singapore Act And Trust Companies Act

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON COMBATING MONEY LAUNDERING AND THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM & PROLIFERATION. The FATF Recommendations

Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Key Findings. Preface

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON COMBATING MONEY LAUNDERING AND THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM & PROLIFERATION. The FATF Recommendations

FATF Mutual Evaluation of Ireland 2017

Financial Action Task Force Groupe d'action financière

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism

To whom it may concern. Implementation of the 4th EU Anti Money Laundering Directive

JERSEY FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION 5 TH ANNIVERSARY SEMINAR FATF REVISED 40 RECOMMENDATIONS

GUIDELINES ON ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COUNTER FINANCING OF TERRORISM (AML/CFT) INSURANCE AND TAKAFUL SECTORS

GOOD PRACTICES ON THE PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORIST FINANCING IN THE NOTARIAL SECTOR

AML/CFT Phase II. Kate Reid NZLS CLE live stream 28 November /11/2017. Check it out by logging in at:

JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE GOVERNOR OF BANK OF MONGOLIA AND CHAIR OF THE FINANCIAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

BENEFICIAL OWNER DISCLOSURE ASSESSMENT OF GHANA S LEGAL FRAMEWORK

Redline (4AMLD 5AMLD)

Anti-Money Laundering & Financial Crimes Conference April 18th 20th, 2018

1. ENTITY & OWNERSHIP 1 Full Legal name

Statutory Review of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act

STEP CERTIFICATE IN ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING. Syllabus

Ireland: Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes FATF Recommendations for Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism

In developing this product AML Accelerate draws on unique and unparalleled knowledge and experience contained within the joint venture partners.

CAYMAN ISLANDS. Supplement No. 2 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 22 of 16th March, THE PROCEEDS OF CRIME LAW.

CORRUPTION. A Reference Guide and Information Note. on the use of the FATF Recommendations. to support the fight against Corruption

Executive Summary. Key Findings

Preparing for the 4 th Round of Mutual Evaluations ANGUILLA, FRIDAY 8 TH OF MAY 2015

B L.N. 372 of 2017 PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT (CAP. 373) Prevention of Money Laundering and Funding of Terrorism Regulations, 2017

High-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions

FATF Report to the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors

Note on the application of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017

Appendix A Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Code

www2.acams.org/webinars

Updates on Disclosure on Beneficial Ownership

FIFTH ENHANCED FOLLOW-UP REPORT OF COSTA RICA

Highlights New AML/CFT Legislation. George Croes Senior Policy Advisor Integrity and

UPDATED MARCH 24, 2017 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES PREVENTION

AML POLICY. 1. Introduction

Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures - Spain

8 October Bearing in mind article 7, paragraph 2, of the Fundamental Law of the Vatican City State, of 26 November 2000;

1. ENTITY & OWNERSHIP 1 Full Legal Name

Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism the Reserve Bank s responsibilities and approach

QUESTION & ANSWERS ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING, COUNTER-TERRORIST FINANCING, AND SANCTIONS REGIME

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 4. Individuals and groups seeking to

Mutual Evaluation Report. Anti money laundering and counter terrorist financing measures in Samoa 2015

AML PROCEDURE. c. Similar techniques are used for both purposes, typically involving three stages:

UK Department for Business Discussion Paper

Assessment of international and domestic risks of money laundering and terrorist financing affecting Scottish solicitors (May 2017)

financial intelligence centre REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Financial Intelligence Centre FAIS Workshop Presented by The Financial Intelligence Centre

Slovenia. Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures. F o l l o w - u p r e p o r t

SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING AND FUNDING OF TERRORISM REGULATIONS

MONEY LAUNDERING - The EU and Malta

Guide to Beneficial Ownership Information: Legal Entities and Legal Arrangements

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Executive Summary. Key Findings

Guidelines for Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism

Declarations by Senior Management or Beneficial Owners (for use by legal persons, organizations, and trustees)

Public Conference The fight against Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Brussels, 15 March 2013

ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING/ COUNTER FINANCING OF TERRORISM GUIDELINES FOR REGISTERED FILING AGENTS

PART VI MUTUAL FUNDS AND MUTUAL FUNDS ADMINISTRATORS SECTOR SPECIFIC AML/CFT GUIDANCE NOTES

THE THIRD EU DIRECTIVE ON MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORIST FINANCING

FIRST ROUND MUTUAL EVALUATIONS POST EVALUATION PROGRESS REPORT OF KENYA. Covering the period August 2017 July 2018

Introduction to FATF THE FINANCIAL ACTION TASK FORCE AND THE ROLE OF LAWYERS IN COMBATING MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORIST FINANCING

Mutual Evaluation Report of Malaysia September Way forward for Labuan IBFC

Revisions to Money Laundering Order and AML/CFT Handbooks

4th Anti-Money Laundering Directive and 2d Fund Transfers Regulation- General overview and impact on payments

APPLICATION PAPER ON COMBATING MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORIST FINANCING

RELIANCE ON THIRD PARTIES

Lawyers and Conveyancers

How are legal arrangements (express trusts and trust-like agreements) formed in the United States?

Standard 2.4. Customer due diligence - Prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing. Regulations and guidelines

SUPPLEMENTARY PEER REVIEW REPORT Exchange of Information on Request 2018 (Second Round) JAMAICA

1. ENTITY & OWNERSHIP 1 Full Legal Name Sparkasse Ulm

Central Bank of The Bahamas PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Guide to Beneficial Ownership Information: Legal Entities and Legal Arrangements

Member States capabilities in fighting tax crimes

Appendix 2. In this Appendix underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. The DFSA Rulebook

So you think all your clients property is clean? 25 October 2017

SUPPLEMENT TO THE GUIDELINE ON PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING

MONEYVAL Report submitted to Moneyval by Cyprus on progress in respect of the Special Assessment Of The Effectiveness Of Customer Due

BANCO NACIONAL ULTRAMARINO, S.A. Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism Disclosure Statement

Anti Money Laundering and Sanctions Rules and Guidance (AML)

Registry General September 2015

Anti Money Laundering Developments. Jersey Financial Services Commission

Appendix 2. The text in this appendix is new and is not underlined and struck through in the usual manner. The DFSA Rulebook

Transcription:

G20 High-Level Principles on Beneficial Owner Transparency (SPAIN) The Spanish legislation is in line and complies with the revised FATF Standards. In this context, Spain recognizes the particular importance of beneficial owner transparency as stated in the G20 High-Level principles. Accordingly, the G20 High level Principles on Beneficial Owner Transparency and their status of implementation in Spain are as below: I. Countries should have a definition of beneficial owner that captures the natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the legal person or legal arrangement. Article 4 of the Act 10/2010 of 28 April, on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing defines beneficial ownership as follows: 2. For the purposes of this Act, beneficial owner shall mean: (a) Natural person or persons on whose behalf it is intended to establish a business relationship or intervene in any transaction. (b) Natural person or persons who ultimately own or control, directly or indirectly, a percentage of more than 25 percent of the capital or voting rights of a legal person, or who by other means exercise control, directly or indirectly, over the management of a legal person. Companies listed on a regulated market of the European Union or equivalent third countries are excepted. (c) Natural person or persons who ultimately own or control over 25 percent or more of the property of a legal arrangement or entity that administers or distributes funds, or, where the beneficiaries of the legal arrangement or entity have yet to be determined, the class of persons in whose main interest is set up or operates. II. Countries should assess the existing and emerging risks associated with different types of legal persons and arrangements, which should be addressed from a domestic and international perspective. a. Appropriate information on the results of the risk assessments should be shared with competent authorities, financial institutions and (DNFBPs1) and, as appropriate, other jurisdictions. b. Effective and proportionate measures should be taken to mitigate the risks identified. c. Countries should identify high-risk sectors, and enhanced due diligence could be appropriately considered for such sectors. Spain has effective mechanisms in most areas to identify, assess and mitigate risks associated to different types of legal persons and arrangements. A specific working group produced a ML/TF risk assessment posed by legal persons, focusing on the risks presented by the different types of legal persons. Additionally, the risks posed by legal entities have been assessed in the CITCO reports focused on money laundering and organized crime. The Commission for the Prevention of Money Laundering has issued several catalogues on risk transactions related to ML/TF to assist obliged persons in the detection of suspicious transactions. These catalogues include risks related to customers being legal persons or transactions related to agents in the 1

case of money remittance services. The one for legal professionals (notaries, registrars, lawyers, etc.) deserves particular attention due to the key role these professionals play in the process of company incorporation and in other acts during the lifetime or the company or through the services offered to legal persons. The catalogues contain red flags concerning customer identification, risky transactions, means of payments employed, or geographical criteria. They have been distributed to the obliged persons through their associations and representatives, which use them in order to complete or update their own risk indicators. In order to improve the quality of the assessments and improve the implication of the private sector, a new group dependent of the Commission for the Prevention of Money Laundering has been created to deal with the national risk assessment and produce a consolidated document. This analysis will include data referred to the risks posed by legal persons. Furthermore, Act 10/1010 expressly deals with the information that must be gathered in order to avoid these risks (articles 3 and 4). Therefore, appropriate information, evidence and assistance in this matter are provided to national and foreign competent prosecutorial and law enforcement authorities. Preventive measures are also foreseen in Act 10/2010 (articles 5 to 7). They cover information regarding the purpose and nature of the business relationship, an ongoing monitoring and the application of due diligence measures. The Act also foresees special measures addressed to high risk sectors (articles 11 and seq.)this way, Act 10/2010 prohibits obliged persons to operate with companies whose ownership and control structure has not been ascertained or where the beneficial owner has not been determined. Regulation 304/2014 implementing Act 10/2010 addresses specifically some of the detected risks, such as requesting enhanced due diligence measures for companies with bearer-shares and shelf-companies, or customers or funds from risk jurisdictions. It also specifies that a complex ownership structure or the fact that a company is merely an asset-holding company should be incorporated as a risk factor in the analyses of the need to apply enhanced CDD measures (article 18.3) and requires MVTs to apply enhanced measures to monitor agents compliance with AML preventative obligations (article 35). III. Countries should ensure that legal persons maintain beneficial ownership information onshore and that information is adequate, accurate, and current. In Spain, companies are obliged to register in the Company Register all information regarding their creation and all important subsequent acts. Furthermore, Regulation 304/2014 implementing Act 10/2010 states that companies shall obtain and record accurate and up-to-date information on the identity of the beneficial owner of the company (article 8). The Act 10/2010 itself regulates the obligation of institutions and persons covered by it to systematically report the Executive Service on the transactions determined in the regulations (article 20). They shall also supply with the documentation and information required and put in place systems allowing them to respond fully and rapidly to enquiries from the Commission for the Prevention of Money Laundering and Monetary Offences and its support bodies (article 21). Finally, Act 10/2010 foresees a sanctioning regime (articles 50 to 62) which covers information related to beneficial ownership. 2

IV. Countries should ensure that competent authorities (including law enforcement and prosecutorial authorities, supervisory authorities, tax authorities and financial intelligence units) have timely access to adequate, accurate and current information regarding the beneficial ownership of legal persons. Countries could implement this, for example, through central registries of beneficial ownership of legal persons or other appropriate mechanisms. As mentioned in the previous question, companies are obliged to register in Company Register all information regarding their creation and all important subsequent acts. This Register is public. Regarding beneficial ownership information, notaries are requested to identify the beneficial ownership of the legal person in all the acts they authorize, since they are obliged persons concerning according to Act 10/2010 (article 2). Information held by each notary is centralized through a Notarial Database (Single Computerized Index) which grants them online information. Additionally, every transmission of shares in Limited Liability Companies (approximately 96% of Spanish legal persons) shall be authorized by a notary. All this information is aggregated and permits direct online access to accurate and up-to-date information on the beneficial ownership of this legal persons. V. Countries should ensure that trustees of express trusts maintain adequate, accurate and current beneficial ownership information, including information of settlors, the protector (if any) trustees and beneficiaries. These measures should also apply to other legal arrangements with a structure or function similar to express trusts. Although trusts cannot be created under the Spanish legislation, Regulation 304/2014 implementing Act 10/2010 foresees specific rules to identify foreign trusts and similar structures when operating in Spain (article 9). VI. Countries should ensure that competent authorities (including law enforcement and prosecutorial authorities, supervisory authorities, tax authorities and financial intelligence units) have timely access to adequate, accurate and current information regarding the beneficial ownership of legal arrangements. Trusts or other similar arrangements cannot be created under the Spanish legislation. As referred above, Regulation 304/2014 implementing Act 10/2010 foresees specific rules to identify foreign trusts and similar structures when operating in Spain (article 9). VII. Countries should require financial institutions and DNFBPs, including trust and company service providers, to identify and take reasonable measures, including taking into account country risks, to verify the beneficial ownership of their customers. a. Countries should consider facilitating access to beneficial ownership information by financial institutions and DNFBPs. b. Countries should ensure effective supervision of these obligations, including the establishment and enforcement of effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions for non-compliance. Act 10/2010 requires obliged persons included in article 2 to take appropriate and effective measures: identification of the beneficial ownership, monitoring of the business relationship, application of due diligence measures according to the existing risks (articles 3 to 7). The Executive Service and financial supervisors are in charge of supervising the compliance with the obligation to identify beneficial owner. The misapplication of these measures is also sanctioned by Act 10/2010 (articles 50 to 62). 3

VIII. Countries should ensure that their national authorities cooperate effectively domestically and internationally. Countries should also ensure that their competent authorities participate in information exchange on beneficial ownership with international counterparts in a timely and effective manner. Act 10/2010 states that the Executive Service of the Commission and the Commission Secretariat shall cooperate with the authorities of other States with analogous functions (article 48). Also, law enforcement and judiciary cooperation in this field is grated both at the EU and extra-eu level through different mechanisms. In practice, competent authorities make an extensive use the information available in the Company Register and in the Council of Notaries, both regarding national investigation and foreign counterpart s requests. IX. Countries should support G20 efforts to combat tax evasion by ensuring that beneficial ownership information is accessible to their tax authorities and can be exchanged with relevant international counterparts in a timely and effective manner. Act 10/2010 provides that tax authorities and law enforcement agents shall have access to the information obtained as a result of the obligation to declaration which is submitted to the Executive Service (article 36). As well as this, they can accede to the information regarding opening or cancellation of current accounts, savings accounts, securities accounts and term deposits submitted to the Executive service (article 43). The Commission Secretariat may provide tax authorities and law enforcement agents with information of relevance for tax or police operations (article 49). Furthermore, since the Spanish tax authorities shall issue a Tax ID number for newly created companies as a requirement prior to company registration in the Company Register, they have access to details on the beneficial ownership of companies. Tax authorities have direct access to the beneficial owner information registered in the notaries databases. Additionally, in May 2016 a new database the Financial Ownership File, will become operational. This database includes information on the opening or cancellation of current accounts, savings accounts, securities accounts and term deposits provided by credit institutions. It will contain the data identifying the holders, beneficial owners, representatives or authorised persons, together with all other persons with withdrawal powers, the date of opening or cancellation, the type of account or deposit and the information identifying the reporting credit institution. It will be accessible to the authorities, including Tax agency. X. Countries should address the misuse of legal persons and legal arrangements which may obstruct transparency, including: a. prohibiting the ongoing use of bearer shares and the creation of new bearer shares, or taking other effective measures to ensure that bearer shares and bearer share warrants are not misused; and b. taking effective measures to ensure that legal persons which allow nominee shareholders or nominee directors are not misused. Act 10/2010 ensures that obliged persons take appropriate steps to identify the structure of ownership and control of legal persons. To that end, they shall not establish or maintain business relationships with legal persons whose ownership or control structure has not been possible to ascertain. In the case of corporations whose shares are represented by bearer shares, this prohibition will be applicable unless the 4

obliged person ascertains by other means the ownership and control structure (article 4). Act 10/2010 also includes nominee shareholders and nominee directors as obliged persons, so they are subject to all the obligations and requirements contained in the referred Act (articles 3 and seq.) in order to prevent the misuse of legal persons and legal arrangements. 5