Structuring Investments into Africa: Tax and BITs Aspects

Similar documents
BEPS: What does it mean for funds and asset managers?

CYPRUS TAX STRUCTURES

Financial Markets Legal Update Seminar

Hot topics in international employment law - Belgium

MiFID2: Documentation Updates

Oversight. Mutual Recognition of Funds between France and Hong Kong. Introduction. August 2017 simmons-simmons.com elexica.com

Employment law and HR implications of Brexit. Olly Jones Peter Lockwood. 21 July 2016

Telecoms Infrastructure Sharing: The Asset Purchase Agreement

EU Commission approves enhancements to Madeira International Business Center Tax Regime

COMPARISON OF EUROPEAN HOLDING COMPANY REGIMES

This article considers the changes that the new Regulation will make to the current prospectus regime for equity issuers.

BUSINESS IN THE UK A ROUTE MAP

The Taxman Cometh. Jon Brose (Seward & Kissel) Martin Shah. Hatice Ismail. Zoë Arnautov. Wednesday 11 & Thursday 12 October 2017

Negotiating co-investment and side car arrangements

Employment law and HR implications of Brexit. Olly Jones Peter Lockwood. 13 July 2016

Brexit related reorganisations and transitions

AIFMD vs UCITS vs MiFID2

CYPRUS ARMENIA: The gateway to Armenian business

Compliance in Germany - Tax Compliance

BUDGET DAY CORPORATE AND INTERNATIONAL TAXATION

Cyprus - Iran. The gateway to Iranian business

Cyprus - Ukraine. A long lasting inheritance

Singapore. Core Strengths. Financial Markets. Major Projects. Information, Communications & Technology. Corporate and Commercial

Construction Webinar: BIM

Session 7: Introduction to Supply Chain Finance and Receivables Purchasing

CYPRUS AS A GATEWAY FOR INDIAN CROSS BORDER TRANSACTIONS

Peter Wright. Renewable Energy Projects in Africa Comparing Procurement Models for Renewable Generation Capacity. Simmons & Simmons March 2015

Despite being among the

Headline Verdana Bold International Tax matters ICPAU Tax Seminar, Hotel Africana November, 2017

CYPRUS GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

Session 4, Stream 6. Global regulation of lending. John Paul Zammit. 07 & 08 October 2015

Tax Issues for Outbound Investors. Marie Bradley Bradley Tax Consulting

ROMANIA GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

The Advantages of the UK as a Location for a Holding Company. David Gibbs May 2015

Tax round-up for banks

Diverted Profits Tax. Key points

Rationalising legal entities and moving operations

CMS_LawTax_Negative_ ep. Tax guide. Non-residents and real estate Budget 2017: Extension of tax on capital gains

Anti-trust Law with an IP Protection Interface in China

IBFD Course Programme Tax Planning in Africa and the Middle East

What is happening to ISDA documentation?

BUSINESS MODELS IN THE CURRENT BEPS ENVIRONMENT DO YOU NEED TO CHANGE? Lyndon James, Partner Pete Rhodes, Senior Manager PwC

UK Takeover Code: Panel consultation on profit forecasts and other amendments

Session 9: Hot Button Items in Hong Kong Equity Capital Markets: Pre-IPO Investments and Weighted Voting Rights

MiFID2 for asset managers headlines and roadmaps

Overview of International Employment Law Issues (Shading highlights something significantly different from the UK position)

U.S. tax reforms prevention of base erosion. S. Krishnan

Dutch Holding-, Finance- and Royalty Companies (An introduction to the main Dutch tax matters)

Finland Country Profile

Middle East Regulatory Update

Analysis of Intellectual Property Tax Planning Strategies of Multinationals and the Impact of the BEPS Project

Tax Planning in the Middle East

The Consumer Rights Act 2015: getting your business ready. Mark Dewar Robert Allen

Employment law in Germany avoiding the common pitfalls? Verena Braeckeler-Kogel

Public consultation on EU merger control

United Kingdom diverted profits tax now in effect

Automatic Exchange of Information in Hong Kong

Cross-border Outsourcing

MiFID2. Commodities. Jonathan Melrose Rosali Pretorius. October 2017

1. What are recent tax developments in your country which are relevant for M&A deals?

Regulatory Capital the proposed revision of the Standardised Approach for credit risk and the automated FinTechsolution

Distribution update the competition law perspective. Peter Meyer Koen Platteau Genevieve Borremans Claudia Mercer Filippo Fioretti

New Terminology. References to. The main theme of NEC4 is that it represents an evolution rather than a revolution in thinking

The NEC3. The Unknowns

Navigating Trade Compliance. Jolyon Ellwood-Russell

Headquarter Jurisdictions Around the World: A Comparison

Dutch Holding-, Finance- and Royalty Companies (An introduction to the main Dutch tax matters)

UK Tax Flash. Reform of the UK CFC Rules: The Next Chapter.

The OECD s 3 Major Tax Initiatives

RSM InterTax Tax Insights February Belgian corporate income tax reform

Oversight. Consultation Conclusions regarding the Hong Kong Position Limit Regime. April 2017 simmons-simmons.com elexica.com

Doing business in the UK. Expansion into the UK - Considerations for US investors. Nick Farmer ACA CTA ATII

Canada s federal budget affects back-to-back arrangements

Dispute Avoidance: Navigating Complex Infrastructure Projects

BELGIUM GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

IMPLEMENTING THE REVISED PARENT SUBSIDIARY DIRECTIVE ACROSS THE EU

Restrictive Covenants: A PRC and Hong Kong Perspective

Update Dutch tax developments

Holding Companies in Cyprus

EU margin requirements for non-cleared derivatives: What do hedge fund managers need to know? Adam Jacobs-Dean Lucian Firth Allan Yip

Cross Border Investments: Mergers and Acquisition and Choice of Jurisdiction

Derivatives Markets not Leaving the Regulatory Spotlight yet

Cyprus Country Profile

The UK as a holding company location

US corporates doing business in Europe. Tax guide

QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE TREATMENT OF INTEREST PAYMENTS AND RELATED TAX BASE EROSION ISSUES

INTERNATIONAL TAX STRUCTURING FOR INVESTING ADROAD INTERNATIONAL TAX CONFERENCE

Portugal Country Profile

Proposed Changes to Ireland s Double Tax Treaties and the U.S. Perspective on MLIs. Chicago, Illinois 14 September ANNUAL MEETING

IBFD Course Programme Current Issues in International Tax Planning

Recent developments in Structured Finance

VAT, Asset Management & Pensions

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document. Proposal for a Council Directive

Cyprus Country Profile

Cyprus - The gateway to global investments

Financing the next industrial revolution. Dan Marjanovic

Lending to overseas borrowers. July 2011

SOUTH AFRICA GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

THE NETHERLANDS GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

Iceland Country Profile

Transcription:

Structuring Investments into Africa: Tax and BITs Aspects February 2015

Structuring Investments into Africa Tax is, of course, only one of many elements to consider when planning cross-border investments. Indeed, tax is unlikely to be one of the main factors in deciding whether or not to make an investment in a jurisdiction or whether or not to take on a development project. However, once a decision has been reached to make an investment or carry out a project on economic grounds, the overall profitability of the investment or development can be greatly affected by the structure adopted and its tax treatment. It is important, therefore, when structuring investments into Africa to ensure that returns to investors do not suffer unnecessary levels of tax. Tax leakage can occur at very many points in a structure on the repatriation of profits from the underlying investment to the intermediate entity, tax at the level of the intermediate entity itself and when profits are repatriated from the intermediate entity to the investor. Each of these stages in an investment structure must be carefully considered to achieve the most tax efficient structure. Many jurisdictions will levy withholding taxes on distributed profits as well as taxing income and gains received from abroad. These tax charges can cascade, leading to a very large overall effective tax rate if care is not taken. For this reason, it is important for inbound investors to consider carefully the choice of an intermediate holding company. A particular issue in developing countries is the range and breadth of taxes and withholding taxes, which can often be much more wide-ranging than in European countries. In particular, potential withholding taxes on payments for services to non-residents are not unusual and these must be factored into the chosen structure and contractual arrangements. In addition, some developing nations will levy tax on direct or indirect disposals of assets situated in their jurisdiction. An intermediate holding company can ensure that, through access to advantageous double tax treaties, taxes are minimised on income received by the holding company. In addition, many of the typical holding company jurisdictions do not levy withholding taxes on outbound payments of dividends or interest (at least where the investment is correctly structured). Most jurisdictions have some form of anti-avoidance provisions to prevent, for example, the artificial diversion of profits or which deny treaty benefits where there is no material substance or presence in a jurisdiction. The OECD s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Action Plan together with recently adopted changes to the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive have brought an increased focus on such measures and recommendations arising out of the OECD s Action Plan are likely to lead to the introduction of further anti-treaty shopping measures in the future. These issues will need to be considered as part of the overall structure. Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) Perhaps equally important as a double tax treaty network, overseas investors looking for a holding jurisdiction for their investments into Africa may look to benefit from BITs. These BITs safeguard crossborder investments made through a holding company within the country of the relevant African BITs partner(s) against future hostile government action. The structure chosen should ideally benefit from favourable BITs protection as well as favourable tax treatment. Particular jurisdictions The following pages provide a brief overview of the potential advantages of using holding companies in the UK, the Netherlands, Portugal, Luxembourg and Mauritius for structuring an investment into Africa. In addition, comparison tables provide an overview of these tax regimes and their treaty networks. 1

United Kingdom Advantages of using a UK investment structure: No UK withholding taxes on outbound dividends No UK capital gains tax on the sale by an investor of its interest in a UK company Tax exemption available on the sale by a UK holding company of its interest in trading subsidiaries Generous interest deduction rules for UK entities No or reduced foreign withholding tax on inbound interest and royalties under double tax treaty network Extensive double tax treaty network 19 BITs concluded by the UK with African countries, which safeguard cross-border investments made through the UK into the country of the relevant African BITs partner(s) Example of a typical structure 2

The Netherlands Advantages of using a Dutch investment structure: No Dutch withholding tax on outbound profit distributions made by a Dutch holding company (such as a Dutch Cooperative, being a corporate vehicle, but without a share capital), if properly structured No Dutch capital gains tax on the sale by an investor of its interest in a Dutch holding company, if properly structured Dutch holding company benefits from participation exemption in respect of dividends received and capital gains realised on the disposal of qualifying shareholdings, with no minimum holding requirement No Dutch withholding tax on outgoing interest and royalty payments No or reduced foreign withholding tax on incoming dividends interest and royalties under double tax treaty network Extensive double tax treaty network More than 25 BITs concluded by the Netherlands with African countries, which safeguard crossborder investments made through a Dutch Holdco within the country of the relevant African BITs partner(s) Availability of advance tax rulings and advance pricing agreements Example of a typical structure 3

Portugal 1 Advantages of using a Portuguese investment structure: No Portuguese withholding tax on outbound distributions made by a Portuguese company in respect of qualifying shareholdings Tax exemption for inbound dividends received by Portuguese companies from a qualifying participation Tax exemption for capital gains on the disposal by a Portuguese company of a qualifying participation No or reduced rates of withholding tax on outbound interest and royalties under double tax treaty network No capital gains tax on the sale by an investor of its shareholding in a Portuguese company Extensive double tax treaty network 6 BITs concluded by Portugal with African countries, which safeguard cross-border investments made through Portugal into the country of the relevant African BITs partner(s) Additional advantages of using a Madeira International Business Centre (MIBC) investment structure: Low corporation tax rate (5%) on non-portuguese sourced income, including income from services rendered to the investment company and dividends not qualifying for the participation exemption regime No withholding tax on royalty, service or interest payments to non-resident entities Example of a typical structure 1 This section prepared by Sociedade Rebelo de Sousa. Contact Paula Pereira (E paula.pereira@srslegal.pt) for more information. 4

Luxembourg Advantages of using a Luxembourg structure: Luxembourg holding company benefits from participation exemption in respect of dividends received and capital gains realised on the disposal of qualifying shareholdings No capital gains tax on disposal of the Luxembourg holding company provided minimum interest and holding period requirements are met Generally no Luxembourg withholding tax on interest and royalties No or reduced foreign withholding tax on incoming interest and royalties under double tax treaty network Extensive double tax treaty network More than 10 BITs concluded by Luxembourg/Belgium with African countries, which safeguard crossborder investments within the country of the relevant African BITs partner(s) Availability of advance tax rulings Example of a typical structure 5

Mauritius Advantages of using a Mauritius holding company structure: No withholding taxes on dividends, interest or royalty payments No capital gains tax No CFC rules No thin cap rules No specific transfer pricing rules (though arm s length provision rules do apply to some transactions between related parties) Generous deemed foreign tax credit of 80% Double tax treaty network, particularly in Asia and Africa Example of a typical structure 6

Overview of tax regimes UK Netherlands Luxembourg Mauritius Portugal Main corporate tax rate (%) Withholding tax on outbound dividends (%) 4 Withholding tax on outbound interest (%) 21 1 25 2 29.22 15 3 21 0 15 5 /0 (for example, if properly structured via a Dutch Coop) 0 6 (if participation exemption applies) 0 7 0 8 (if exemption for qualifying shareholdings applies) 20 9 0 0 0 10 25 11 Corporate tax on dividends received 12 0 0 (if participation exemption 13 applies) 0 (if participation exemption 14 applies) 0 15 0 (if participation exemption 16 applies) Capital Gains tax on disposals by HoldCo 0 17 0 (if participation exemption 18 applies) 0 (if participation 0 0 (if participation exemption applies) 19 exemption applies) Treaty network Largest network of over 110 treaties Over 90 treaties Over 70 treaties Over30 treaties Over 65 treaties IP regime 20 UK patent box regime Dutch Innovation box regime Luxembourg IP box regime Portuguese patent box regime 1 The UK Government has announced a reduction in the main rate of corporation tax to 20% from April 2015. 2 20% on the first EUR 200,000 of taxable profits. 3 Entities with a Global Business Licence (1) in Mauritius can claim an 80% foreign tax credit, reducing the overall tax rate in Mauritius on overseas profits to 3%. Entities with a Global Business Licence (2) are exempt from tax, but do not qualify for DTTs. 4 Dividend paid by a company in one Member State to a recipient in another Member State would generally be exempt from withholding taxes under the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive. 5 Normal rate of 15% may be reduced or eliminated under appropriate DTT. 6 15% if participation exemption does not apply, but may be reduced by relevant double tax treaties. 7 For entities with a Global Business Licence (1) in Mauritius. 8 25% if exemption does not apply. 9 Normal rate of 20% may be reduced or eliminated under appropriate DTT or EU Interest and Royalties Directive. 10 For entities with a Global Business Licence (1) in Mauritius. 11 May be reduced or eliminated under appropriate DTT or the EU Interest and Royalties Directive. Also, 0% if paid by an MIBC holding company. 12 Dividend, interest and IP royalty income derived by a Member State from other Member States would generally be exempt from tax under the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive or the EU Interest and Royalties Directive. 13 Generally requires a 5% shareholding. 14 Generally requires a 10% shareholding or an acquisition price of EUR 1.2m for dividends and an uninterrupted holding period of at least 12 months. 15 For entities with a Global Business Licence (1) in Mauritius. 16 Generally requires a 5% shareholding. Rate is 23% if participation exemption does not apply (or 5% if received by an MIBC holding company). 17 Where disposal of a trading company or trading group and provided that the substantial shareholding exemption applies. 18 Generally requires a 5% shareholding. 19 Generally requires a 10% shareholding or an acquisition price of EUR 6m for capital gains and an uninterrupted holding period of at least 12 months. 20 Following the OECD s BEPS Action Plan, it is likely that IP regimes, such as the UK s patent box, the Dutch innovation box and Luxembourg s IP box regime, will need to be substantially modified to apply only to income generated through qualifying R&D carried out in the relevant jurisdiction. 7

Treaties with African Nations Mauritius Tax treaties with African nations BITs with African nations Netherlands No DT Treaties with 10 African nations BITs with over 25 African nations UK Yes DT Treaties with 18 African nations BITs with 19 African nations Portugal Yes DT Treaties with 9 African nations BITS with 6 African nations Luxembourg Yes DT Treaties with 3 African nations BITs with over 10 African nations Mauritius DT Treaties with 14 African nations BIT with South Africa 8

Simmons & Simmons Simmons & Simmons has been operating in Africa for over 20 years and has acted on matters involving at least 48 of the 54 African nations. We advise on a huge variety of projects in Africa, including mining and natural resources, energy and infrastructure projects. Our experience in Africa, combined with our practices in the Far East, Middle East and Europe, allows us to offer clients an in-depth understanding of their local business and needs. Contacts Nick Cronkshaw T +44 20 7825 4289 E nick.cronkshaw@simmons-simmons.com Martin Shah T +44 20 7825 4638 E martin.shah@simmons-simmons.com Darren Oswick T +44 20 7825 3546 E darren.oswick@simmons-simmons.com René van Eldonk T +31 20 722 2537 E rene.vaneldonk@simmons-simmons.com Peter Flipsen T +31 20 722 2540 E peter.flipsen@simmons-simmons.com Pierre-Régis Dukmedjian T +352 26 21 16 12 E pierre-regis.dukmedjian@simmons-simmons.com elexica.com is the award winning online legal resource of Simmons & Simmons Simmons & Simmons LLP 2015. All rights reserved, and all moral rights are asserted and reserved. This document is for general guidance only. It does not contain definitive advice. SIMMONS & SIMMONS and S&S are registered trade marks of Simmons & Simmons LLP. Simmons & Simmons is an international legal practice carried on by Simmons & Simmons LLP and its affiliated practices. Accordingly, references to Simmons & Simmons mean Simmons & Simmons LLP and the other partnerships and other entities or practices authorised to use the name Simmons & Simmons or one or more of those practices as the context requires. The word partner refers to a member of Simmons & Simmons LLP or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications or to an individual with equivalent status in one of Simmons & Simmons LLP s affiliated practices. For further information on the international entities and practices, refer to simmons-simmons.com/legalresp Simmons & Simmons LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England & Wales with number OC352713 and with its registered office at CityPoint, One Ropemaker Street, London EC2Y 9SS. It is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. A list of members and other partners together with their professional qualifications is available for inspection at the above address. [B_LIVE_EMEA11_1988173]