Anti-Kickback Statute Jess Smith

Similar documents
Gifts to Referral Sources. Kim C. Stanger (11-17)

WHAT EVERY NEW PRACTITIONER SHOULD CONSIDER

Stark and the Anti Kickback Statute. Regulating Referral Relationship. February 27-28, HCCA Board Audit Committee Compliance Conference.

Hancock, Daniel & Johnson, P.C., P.O. Box 72050, Richmond, VA , ,

Stark, AKS, FCA Primer

Investigator Compensation: Motivation vs. Regulatory Compliance

Fraud and Abuse Laws. Kim C. Stanger. Compliance Bootcamp (5/18)

Medical Ethics. Paul W. Kim, JD, MPH O B E R K A L E R

Why Physicians and Physician Organizations Should be Concerned about Stark Compliance

Physician Lease Arrangements: New Rules

Law Department Policy No. L-8. Title:

Stark/Anti- Kickback Fundamentals

FRAUD AND ABUSE LAW IMPLICATED BY COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS. Lee Rosebush, PharmD, RPh, MBA, JD

Stark Update HCCA Hawaii Conference

2014 Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP

LEGAL ISSUES FOR MEDICAL RESIDENTS

UNDERSTANDING AND WORKING WITH THE LATEST STARK LAW DEVELOPMENTS

Compensation Paid by Healthcare Providers

Health Law 101: Issue-Spotting In Dealing With Health-Care Providers. by William H. Hall Jr.

Fraud and Abuse Compliance for the Health IT Industry

This course is designed to provide Part B providers with an overview of the Medicare Fraud and Abuse program including:

Check Your Physician Contracts

Industry Funding of Continuing Medical Education

Provider and Provider Relationships. Primary Fraud and Abuse Issues

Managing Financial Interests: The Anti Kickback Statute (AKS)

Health Care Fraud for Physicians

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL WORK PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2006 MEDICARE HOSPITALS

Physician Relationship Compliance Issues

Physician Relationship Compliance Issues. Charles Oppenheim Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC

THE CHRIST HOSPITAL POLICY NO.: ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY PAGE 1 OF 9

7/25/2018. Government Enforcement in the Clinical Laboratory Space. The Statutes & Regulations. The Stark Law. The Stark Law.

Anti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act Enforcement

Fraud and Abuse Laws: Understanding, Applying and Avoiding Liability

Physician s Guide to Stark Law Part I

PHYSICIAN INVESTMENT COMPLIANCE

MANAGING HOSPITAL/PHYSICIAN FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS

ANCILLARY services: How to Stay Out of Trouble. The neurosurgical minefield Informed consent

Federal Fraud and Abuse Enforcement in the ASC Space

Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training

Coding Partners in Patient Safety

Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures. Top 5 Things to Know for CE:

Ensuring Compliance with the Law - Properly Structuring Innovative Marketing and Creative Joint Ventures. Clay Stribling, Esq.

Conflicts of Interest 9/10/2017. Everything a Health Care Executive Needs to Know about the Anti-Kickback Statute. May 2, 2017 Article from JAMA:

Improving Integrity in Nursing Centers

LIFEBLOOD OF THE SUCCESSFUL PHARMACY: MARKETING, JOINT VENTURES, AND ARRANGEMENTS WITH REFERRAL SOURCES WHILE REMAINING WITHIN LEGAL PARAMETERS

PI Compensation: Methods, Documentation, and Execution

PI Compensation: Methods, Documentation, and Execution

Anti-Fraud Plan. Care1st Health Plan Arizona, Inc./ ONECare by Care1st Health Plan Arizona, Inc.

Valuation of Health Care Entity Property or Services Transfers

AHLA. U. Physician Relationship Audit Workshop: A Practical Guide to Auditing Physician Relationships and Addressing Identified Issues

Private Equity Investments in Health Care Practices

S ark L aw aw An A t n i-kickbac b k S atut u e an an d Fal F se Cl C aims A c A t E f n orcement Jay y P. P A n A sti t n i e, e JD R adma m p

Building a Strategic Plan for Physician Employment and Practice Acquisition

PHASE II OF THE FINAL STARK REGULATIONS: WHAT DO THEY MEAN FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS

PROPOSED STARK LAW REVISIONS COULD AFFECT MANY EXISTING BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND HOSPITALS AND OTHER PROVIDERS

FAST BREAK : HOLIDAY GIFTS Jake Harper December 18, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Gainsharing Is it Still Feasible? May 14, 2010

Physician Care: Physician Compensation. Presented by Albert R. Riviezzo, Esq. Fox Rothschild LLP Exton, PA

Physician Contracting An Overview of Legal Policy No. 9

Mission Statement. Compliance & Fraud, Waste and Abuse Training for Network Providers 1/31/2019

Physician Contracts GOVERNANCE THOUGHT LEADERSHIP SERIES

PHYSICIAN PRACTICES IN A STARK WORLD. David E. Matyas. A. The Statutory Prohibition (Social Security Act 1877; 42 U.S.C. 1395nn)

Anti-Kickback Statute: Are Per-Patient Referral Fee Arrangements Permissible?

DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT AND FALSE CLAIMS POLICY INFORMATION FOR All NEW YORK WORKFORCE MEMBERS

FAST BREAK : STARK LESSONS FOR PHYSICIAN PRACTICE ACQUISITIONS Albert Shay, Eric Knickrehm, and Jake Harper August 23, 2018

Stark Law Contracting Tips and Problem-Solving May 14, 2015

Telemedicine Fraud and Abuse Under the Microscope

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Office of Inspector General s Use of Agreements to Protect the Integrity of Federal Health Care Programs

Compliance in Physician Employment and Hospital- Physician Integration

FRAUD, WASTE, & ABUSE (FWA) for Brokers. revised 10/17

SCHEMES, SCAMS AND FLIM-FLAMS: HOW THE DME SUPPLIER CAN RECOGNIZE FRAUD LANDMINES. Denise Leard, Esq Brown & Fortunato, P.C.

Current Status: Active PolicyStat ID: Fraud, Waste and Abuse

Practical Considerations for Medical Practices Considering Converting Their Vascular Access Centers Into Medicare-Certified Ambulatory Surgery Centers

Top 10 Issues in APM Contract Negotiations

The Anti-Kickback Statute. May 3, 2013 Tennessee Hospice Organization Compliance Forum

Audit, Compliance, and Regulatory Guidelines

N R a v e n s w o o d A v e, S t e C h i c a g o, I L w w w. a e g i s - c o m p l i a n c e.

Repay Overpayments (18 USC 1347; 42 CFR et seq.)

AHLA. F. Anti-Kickback Primer. David E. Matyas Epstein Becker & Green PC Washington, DC

MANAGING HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE REGULATORY RISK IN THE NEW HEALTH CARE ECONOMY

Supplemental Special Advisory Bulletin: Independent Charity. Patients who cannot afford their cost-sharing obligations

HEALTH CARE FRAUD. EXPERT ANALYSIS HHS OIG Adopts New Anti-Kickback Safe Harbor and Civil Monetary Penalty Exceptions

Stark Prevention A Practical Approach to Physician Transactions. Paul Belton, VP Corporate Compliance Sharp Healthcare

HCCA Compliance Institute Dallas, Texas Session 401- Monday, April 19, 2010

Hospital Incentive Payments to Physicians for Quality and Cost Savings

CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Legal Issues: Fraud and Abuse Navigating Stark and Kickback. Reece Hirsch, Esq. Jordana Schwartz, Esq. HIT Summit West March 7, 2005

Stark Law Making the Confusion Understandable

Compliance Program. Health First Health Plans Medicare Parts C & D Training

The Impact of the Fraud and Abuse Laws on Pharmaceutical Advertising and Marketing Compliance: A Manufacturer s Perspective

The Anesthesia Company Model: Frequently Asked Questions

STARK ENFORCEMENT. BY ROBERT G. HOMCHICK Partner, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP (206) I.

Medicare Parts C & D Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Training and General Compliance Training

WikiLeaks Document Release

MARSHALL L. MATZ MARK L. ITZKOFF *PRACTICE WITHIN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS LIMITED TO MATTERS AND PROCEEDINGS BEFORE FEDERAL COURTS AND AGENCIES

What is the HHS OIG?

Ohio Hospital Association 2014 Annual Meeting. Compensating Employed Physicians In An Evolving Health Care Environment

Disclaimer LEGAL ISSUES IN PHYSICAL THERAPY

AHLA. A. Stark Law Primer. Troy A. Barsky Crowell & Moring LLP Washington, DC

Manufacturer Patient Support Initiatives: Current Practices and Recent Challenges. Andrew Ruskin Morgan Lewis

Transcription:

Anti-Kickback Statute Jess Smith

Overview 1972 - Enacted 1977 - Violation became a felony 1996 - Expanded to include all Federal Health Care Programs 2009 - Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT)

Federal Anti-Kickback Statute 42 U.S.C. 1320a-7b. Is a criminal statute that prohibits the exchange (or offer to exchange), of anything of value, in an effort to induce (or reward) the referral of federal health care program business.

One Purpose Test Established United States v. Greber (U.S. v. Greber (3d Cir. 1985)) Definition if one purpose of the payment was to induce future referrals, the Medicare statute has been violated.

Application Applies to anyone who solicits, receives, offers or pays with intent to induce or reward referrals for federal program business. Providers Vendors Managers or administrators Marketing personnel Anyone else Applies to participants on both sides of the transaction!

Applies to referrals for items or services covered by a federal health care program Medicare Medicaid Other federal programs Limiting to non-medicare/medicaid or other Federal programs does not necessarily insulate the arrangement States have AKS and many apply to any source of patients.

Applies to any form of remuneration in exchange for referrals for federal program business Money Contracts for services Free or discounted items or services Over/under payments (i.e. not fair market value) Waivers of copays or deductibles Anything of value

AKS Violations are a Felony

AKS Penalties 5 years in prison per offense $25,000 fine per offense (42 USC 1320a-7b(b))

AKS Violation = Civil Monetary Violation

Civil Monetary Penalties $50,000 civil monetary penalties per violation AND 3 times the payments received AND Exclusion from ALL Federal Healthcare Programs Medicare/Medicaid/Tricare/etc (42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(7))

Federal Health Care Programs Exclusion (i.e.: Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, VA) Impact items or services that are furnished, ordered, or prescribed will not be covered Entity may not bill directly for treating Medicare and Medicaid patients Services cannot be billed indirectly through an employer or a group practice No order or prescription that is provided to a private-pay patient will be reimbursable by any Federal health care program.

AKS Violation = False Claims Act Violation

False Claims Act violation (Civil Violation) Preponderance of Evidence Standard $5500 - $11000 per violation 3 x damages Qui tam lawsuit

STARK LAW: Lou Paravate

1) "Stark" is a set of United States federal laws named after US Congressman Pete Stark. (Example: "Fulbright Scholarships" or "Monroney Stickers.") Stark prohibits referrals by a physician of Medicare or Medicaid patients to an entity that provides any of 12 designated health services in which the physician or immediate family member has a financial relationship. Stark is otherwise known as "The Federal Physician Self-Referral Prohibition" or "The Ethics In Patient Referrals' Act." Because of it's maze-like complexity, I prefer to (sarcastically) call Stark the "Healthcare Attorney Full Employment Act."

2) The bill was introduced in Congress in 1988 and became law in 1990, effective January 1, 1992. Subsequent amendments and additions were passed in 1993 (Stark II), 2001, 2004, 2007 (Stark III) and 2010. 3) The concept behind Stark is that "a doctor should never receive financial gain for recommending a treatment that the doctor does not personally provide." And that a "self-referral" is an inherent conflict of interest which encourages overutilization of services, which in turn drives up health care costs.

Those who oppose Stark argue that physicians who own, invest in or operate medical facilities are responding to a need which might otherwise not be met, particularly in medically underserved areas. In addition, physician owned entities often offer a lower cost alternative to facilities that are located in hospitals, because hospitals usually have higher overhead costs. It is my personal opinion that Stark discourages creativity and innovation in health care. Doctors are on the front lines of patient care and are the first to spot a medical need and better respond to that need.

4) Acting alone, a physician (or those within his office or group) cannot violate Stark Law through the in-house treatment of a patient, because there is no "outside referral" to someone else. 5) Numerous other laws and regulations may overlap or apply: fee-splitting prohibitions, notice requirements, Medicare conditions of participation and billing rules like Anti-Markup. Your own state's fraud and abuse statutes may or may not mirror the federal rules.

6) Stark initially only applied to clinical laboratory services. Now Stark applies to a large number of services or "Designated Health Services" (DHS). Please remember that term, "DHS." A would DHS include but not be limited to one of these 12 categories: Clinical labs, physical therapy, occupational therapy, outpatient speech pathology, radiology and some imaging, radiation therapy, durable medical equipment, nutrients, prosthetics, home health series, outpatient prescription drugs and inpatient and outpatient hospital services.

7) Stark penalties could be: A) Denial of payment, B) Three times refund of payment, C) $15,000 penalty per service, D) $100,000 per circumvention scheme and E) Exclusion from Medicare/Medicaid programs. Multiple federal entities oversee Stark enforcement including Department of Justice, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG). 8) Stark applies to doctors, dentists, optometrists and chiropractors.

9) "Immediate family members" goes as far out as grandparents, grandchildren and in-laws, whether they be natural or adoptive. 10) "Financial relationship" includes ownership, investment interest or compensation arrangements. 11) Stark contains several exceptions including physician services, in-office ancillary services, ownership in publicly traded stock, rental of office space and equipment and bona fide employment relationships. A recent Stark exception is for imaging services to be provided within a group practice. Even then, the practice must provide the patient with a list of alternate sources for the service offered where the patient resides.

12) There are seven "Safe Harbors" in contracts between physicians and hospitals: A) The contract must be for a least a year B) In writing signed by both parties C) Specific aggregate payment which is set in advance D) Payment is reasonable fair market value E) Payment not related to volume or value of business F) Exact services to be performed must be outlined G) Must be commercially reasonable

13) The concept of Stark, but not necessarily Stark itself, has four levels: A) The federal level which covers federal programs like Medicare/Medicaid. B) The state level which may add regulations on top of the federal regulations (but almost always cannot diminish them) and may extend Stark type regulations to commercial insurance. Please see your individual state laws regarding self-referral prohibitions. C) Individual in-state commercial insurance contracts may contain self-referral prohibitions. D) National commercial insurance contracts (i.e. Humana) may contain self-referral prohibitions.

14) Just as we have 10,000 laws to enforce the Ten Commandments, use your common sense regarding Stark. If it seems unethical, it probably is.

Quiz