DIRECTIONS FOR COMPLETING EXCESS COST CALCULATION For FY

Similar documents
IDEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Dr. Harry Repsher Budgets and Grants Specialist

Guidance and Instructions Handbook EXCESS COSTS CALCULATIONS INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (IDEA), PART B

Excess Costs. IDEA-B Requirement. Texas Education Agency (TEA)

Guidance and Instructions Handbook EXCESS COSTS CALCULATIONS INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (IDEA), PART B

Is Your District in Compliance with Excess Cost Federal Requirement?

EDC CHARTER SELPA FISCAL YEAR END CLOSE REFERENCE BOOK FISCAL YEAR-END CLOSE REFERENCE BOOK. March 2015 Page 1-0

Completing the FY16 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Excess Cost Worksheet September, 2015

Overview of the Title VI-B LEA Authenticated Application: Maintenance of Effort & Excess Cost. Revised 2/28/2013

Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent Educating Georgia s Future gadoe.org The Role of Budgeting in the Planning and Implementation Process

Introductions. Robert (Bob) Steponovich. Ginese Quann. Business Services Director Charter SELPA. Director Charter SELPA. Text Here

FY 15 IDEA Part B Allocations and Funding Issues

Spring 2017 FISCAL WORKSHOP

Site-Based Expenditure Reporting Guidance Release Webinar February 2, 2018 Questions & Answers

IDEA Part B LEA Maintenance of Effort

Who or What is MOE? Dr. Harry Repsher, Budget Specialist

IDEA Local Maintenance of Effort Requirements

Excess Cost: The Basics Jana Rosborough, NCSI FST Dean Zajic, Kansas State Department of Education

Special Education Fiscal Review

7 Revenue from cities and counties , , 7. Cont Cont Cont.

PROPORTIONATE SHARE A Brief Overview of the Requirement, Implementation and Common Challenges

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Funding Questions & Answers

Fiscal Compliance for Special Education: Excess Cost

SUBPART C--LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY ELIGIBILITY

Arkansas Department of Education Special Education Finance & Budgeting Workshop

Year- End Close/ Unaudited Actuals Sequence and Due Date to SCOE

New Maintenance of Effort Reporting Requirement for Section 611/Section 619 Grants. May 2017

SACS Forum May 16, 2018

Tehama County Special Education Local Plan Allocation Plan and Budget Information:

IDEA-B LEA MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE) GUIDANCE HANDBOOK FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014 AND BEYOND

Educationally Related Mental Health Services (ERMHS) FUNDING GUIDELINES

SPED FINANCE October 1 Amendment Data Conference

Budget Update Budget Amendments Fiscal 2019

FY 2014 Consolidated Application Special Education Program Guidance Information IDEA Section 611, Federal Preschool Section 619 and State Preschool

Madison City Schools Budget. FY 2019 Proposed Budget 2nd Public Hearing September 6, 2018

1 st Interim Workshop. Steve Mattern Jennifer Noga Jordan Aquino Connie Vargas Marcos Gamino

KANSAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION LEA ASSURANCES

Local Educational Agency (LEA) Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Calculator: Instructions

GUIDANCE. Funds under Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of Made Available Under

Millbrae Elementary School District First Interim for Fiscal Year Board of Trustees

(This page left intentionally blank)

ASBO Accountability Teacher- Compensation. Wednesday, April 26th

FY 2012 Consolidated Application Special Education Program Guidance Information IDEA Section 611, Federal Preschool Section 619 and State Preschool

SECTION VII LOCAL PLAN BUDGET. A. BUDGET FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION [ EC (h) (1) (4)]

IDEA MOE Prior Years Expenditures Compliance Analysis Template. for. Special Education Maintenance of Effort (MOE)

Special Education Funding

% of Total Population

Table of Contents. Fiscal Oversight

Oasis Charter High School

Arizona School Finance Manual

IDEA-B LEA Maintenance of Effort. Training Handouts

Christa McAuliffe Charter Elementary

Senate Bill 175. Denise Ulberg, Executive Director MASBO 2013 MCEL Conference Billings Hotel October 17, 2013

IDEA Part B Section 611 & 619 Grants

5 Year Budget Forecast

Fiscal Committee June 8, Robert (Bob) Steponovich Business Services Director

GUIDE TO COMPLETING THE ESTIMATES FORMS

Los Gatos Union School District Proposed Budget and Multi-year Projection. Narrative

Local Educational Agency Maintenance of Effort Calculator: Instructions (version 1.3)

TECUMSEH LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT IRN # FIVE-YEAR FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS OCTOBER

July 1 Budget Fiscal Year Charter School Certification

Charter School State Funding. Alexis Schauss, Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction February 22, 2018

Kyrene Citizens Budget Committee April 3, 2017 Mariposa Elementary School. O v e r y e a r s o f e x c e l l e n c e i n e d u c a t i o n

If you need further assistance, contact the OPI school budgeting staff: Kara Sperle , Paul Taylor , or Mari Haefka

52 ND SOUTH DAKOTA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BUSINESS OFFICIALS FALL CONFERENCE

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

FY 2012 School Improvement Grant -Section 1003(g) Budget Development

Maintenance of Effort (MOE) for Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Part B

MOUNT PLEASANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT San Jose, California. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2011

Subpart G: Authorization, Allotment, Use of Funds

IDEA PART B SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY (LEA) MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE) ISSUED APRIL 28, 2015 AND EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2015

School Finance Basics and District Support Operations. Budgeting. When Do You Begin?

ESEA FINANCIAL ISSUES

NPS BUDGET DEVELOPMENT FY School Committee Presentation January 15, /11/2019 Nantucket Public Schools 1

UNION Advertised Enrollments UNION COUNTY VOCATIONAL

Exhibit B BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Allocation Plan

`PART B--ASSISTANCE FOR EDUCATION OF ALL CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES

MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT 101

USD 273 Beloit Public Schools

FY 2017 APPROVED BUDGET. School Operating Budget

Sussex Advertised Enrollments Hopatcong

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE BOROUGH OF WEST WILDWOOD

FALL UPDATE TO THE BUDGET. Lethbridge School District No. 51

PRELIMINARY OPERATING BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2019

Belmont Public Schools Amendment to FY18 Budget S C H O O L C O M M I T T E E M AY 2 3,

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FOR GEORGIA LOCAL UNITS OF ADMINISTRATION. 10/30/91 II Financial Reporting. 1 March 2017 II-7 QBE Program Reporting/Budgeting

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SUPPORT PROGRAM BASED ON THE FINAL COMPUTATIONS FOR THE YEAR

HINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUDGET OVERVIEW FOR FY 18. Operating Budget Proposal from the Administration to the School Committee January 5, 2017

Budget Development Update

Park City School District

Hernando County School Board, FL

Local Plan. Washoe County School District

Valley View Schools District 365U. Budget and Property Tax Workshop October 20, 2008

Mercer Advertised Enrollments Mercer County Vocational

1. Total Budgeted Revenues for Fiscal Year 2017 $ 75,231,767 SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL EXPENDITURE BUDGET

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS COUNTY SCHOOL SERVICE FUND AUDIT REPORT JUNE 30, 2016 * * *

SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING UPDATE Senate Committee on E-12 Policy

Board of Education FY Proposed Budget

DISTRICT NAME Round Valley Unified School District

Natomas Unified School District

Transcription:

DIRECTIONS FOR COMPLETING EXCESS COST CALCULATION For FY 2013-14 1. What fiscal year do I use for this calculation? The excess cost calculation that you are completing is for fiscal year 2013-14. For items 1 though 15, use data from the previous year- 2012-13 (this includes CBEDS from October 2012 for item 14) to complete the yellow highlighted areas. 2. How do you calculate your district s FTE? The FTE has nothing to do with district personnel. This is your district s special education pupil count FTE. Your district special education pupil count from December 1, 2013 CASEMIS should be broken down by percentage of time by disability spent in special education. FOR EXAMPLE: 100 students in special education-your actual pupil count is 100, but you need to determine the time spent in special education. 40 students are in speech; their % of time in special ed. is 1% so the FTE for these 40 students is.40 20 students are in an ED classroom; their % of time in special ed. is 100% to the FTE for these 20 students is 20.00 40 students are SLD and their % of time of in special ed. is 30% so the FTE for these 40 students is 12.00 The total FTE for these 100 special education students is 32.40. This is the FTE for item 17. Based on this very basic example, with the large number of students in speech receiving minimal special education services, the FTE reduces accordingly. If your district has a large number of students with severe disabilities receiving special education for the majority of the day, your FTE will be much higher than a district who provides services primarily to students with less severe disabilities. Also important to note, although the CASEMIS Dec 1 report is used to provide you with the total number of students and a general FTE of Time in Special Ed on the calculator, if your district provides services in a model that includes more inclusion, co-teaching, or other method that does not involve the student being pulled from their general education setting, you may have to complete additional or unique calculations to identify the amount of special education time that they are receiving. See Special Ed Enrollment Data Report and FTE of Time in Special Ed Calculator. 3. How often do you need to complete the excess cost calculation? Districts must complete the excess cost calculation on an annual basis. May is a great time to run this calculation to see where you district is falling, giving you time to make adjustments to special ed or general fund budget allocations prior to close of books. The Excess Cost Calculation information is directly available in the SACS code software. The best time to complete the calculation and to complete these worksheets is when you are closing your books, rather than having to return to the software on a later date to complete. The FY13-14 Excess Cost Calculation is due to SELPA/County Office by Friday, September 19, 2014. 4. Under the certificated staff, does this mean just teachers? What fiscal year should I use?

Include the % of all certificated staff in these cells. If you are an elementary school district, you would have 100% elementary. If you are a unified school district, you must calculate elementary and secondary separately. This field is used to calculate both prior year and current year, the majority of the information calculated is for prior year so use your prior year certificated staff FTE to determine your % breakdown (the very first yellow highlighted cells on the calculation). The percentage shouldn t vary much between the two fiscal years. 5. For fund 01-09, does this mean fund 01 and 09 only, or all funds with the range? This includes all funds 01 through 09

San Mateo County SELPA District Excess Cost Calculation FY 2013-14 DUE BY FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2013 The excess cost calculation determines what excess costs are; maintenance of effort (MOE) demonstrates that you have not supplanted local funds with IDEA funds to pay those excess costs. Except as otherwise provided, amounts provided to an LEA under Part B of the Act may be used only to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities. Excess costs are those costs for the education of an elementary school or secondary school student with a disability that are in excess of the average annual per student expenditure in an LEA during the 2013-2014 school year for an elementary school or secondary school student, as may be appropriate. An LEA must spend at least the average annual per student expenditure on the education of an elementary school or secondary school child with a disability before funds under Part B of the Act are used to pay the excess costs of providing special education and related services. The excess cost test requires that the LEA spend in aggregate at least as much on the non-special education of children with disabilities as they spend on non-disabled children at that educational level, before spending IDEA funds. Section 602(8) of the Act and 300.16 require the LEA to compute the minimum average amount separately for children with disabilities in its elementary schools and for children with disabilities in its secondary schools. Calculations must be made separately for elementary schools and secondary schools in an LEA. LEAs may not compute the minimum average amount it must spend on the education of children with disabilities based on a combination of the enrollments in its elementary schools and secondary schools. The example below shows how to compute the minimum average amount an LEA must spend for the education of each of its elementary and secondary school children with disabilities under section 602(3) of the Act before it may use funds under Part B of the Act. There are no official rules on how to break out elementary from high school for a unified district. It has been suggested that LEAs can use a variety of approaches. One approach is to split based on certificated full time equivalent (FTE). To do this the LEA should count the number of certificated FTE in Elementary and the number of certificated FTE in Secondary and pro-rate expenditures proportionately. If FTE serve in a district-wide capacity, pro-rate them in a reasonable manner. District should maintain documentation to support the method chose to use for this local definition. NOTE: FILL IN YELLOW HIGHLIGHTED CELLS ONLY Local Definition TOTAL EXPENDITURES % ELEMENTARY % SECONDARY Enter certificated staff FTE %s Section a. First the LEA must determine the total amount of its expenditures for students from all OPERATING funds local, State, and Federal (including Part B) in 2012-2013. (Use FUNDS 01-09, 13, and 61-62 ONLY) Item 1 State and Local Expenditures - FD 01-09, 13, 61, 62; RS 0000-2999 and 6000-9999 Objects 1000-7999 $ - $ - $ - Item 2 Federal Expenditures - FD 01-09, 13, 61, 62; RS 3000-5999 (excluding 3315, 3320, 3312, 3318, 3332, 3355 & state portion of 3385) $ - $ - $ - Item 3 Total Expenditures $ - $ - $ - Section b. Next, the LEA must subtract from the total expenditures calculated in section a. above all amounts spent in 2012-2013 for the following resources (these are considered supplemental expenditures). These are actual expenditures only. (Use FUNDS 01-09, 13, and 61-62 ONLY) Item 4 Total Expenditures $ - $ - $ - Item 5 IDEA, Part B allocation - RS 3310, 3311, 3386 $ - $ - $ - Item 6 Title I, Part A Allocation - RS 3010, 3011, 3012, 3013, 3175-3178, 3185 $ - $ - $ - Item 7 Title III, Part A & B Allocation - RS 4201-4204 $ - $ - $ - Item 8 State & Local Funds Spent for Children With Disabilities - Goal 5xxx $ - $ - $ - Item 9 State & Local Funds Spent for Title I, Part A & Title III, Parts A & B (GF contributions) Resources listed above in items 6-7 $ - $ - $ - Item 10 Total Expenditures less supplemental expenditures $ - $ - $ - Page 1 of 2

San Mateo County SELPA District Excess Cost Calculation FY 2013-14 Section c. Next, deduct capital outlay and debt service for resources not listed in section b. above. (FUNDS 01-09, 13, 61-62 ONLY) DUE BY FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2013 Item 11 Total Expenditures less supplemental expenditures $ - $ - $ - Item 12 Capital Outlay and Debt - OBJ 6xxx, &/or OBJ 7438, &/or OBJ 7439, &/or FUNCTION 8500 $ - $ - $ - Item 13 Total Expenditures less Capital Outlay & Debt $ - $ - $ - Section d. Next, the LEA must determine the average annual per student expenditure dividing the average number of students enrolled in the school of the agency during 2012-2013 (including its children with disabilities) into the amount computed under the above paragraph. The amount obtained through this computation is the minimum amount the LEA must spend (on the average) for the education of each of its children with disabilities "before" Part B funds may be used. Item 13 Total amount for average calculation $ - $ - $ - Item 14 Number of students enrolled in 2012-2013 school year - CBEDS, ALL students (General Ed and Special Ed ) - - Item 15 Average annual expenditure per student #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Section e. Next, to determine the total minimum amount of funds the LEA must spend for the education of its children with disabilities in the LEA (not including capital outlay and debt service), the LEA must multiply the number of children with disabilities in the LEA during 2013-2014 times the average annual per student expenditure obtained in paragraph d above. Funds under Part B of the Act can only be used for excess costs over and above this minimum. NOTE: Item 17 below requires you to calculate the amount of time each student is actually in special ed classes. CASEMIS data specifies the percentage of time that each student is in General Education. Use this information for each special ed student to get a FTE on each. See attached worksheet for calculation instructions Item 16 Average annual expenditure per student #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Item 17 Number of full-time special ed student equivalents (From FTE of Time in SpEd Calculator) - - Item 18 TOTAL MINIMUM AMOUNT THAT MUST BE SPENT BEFORE USING PART B FUNDS (Excess Cost) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Section f. Finally, determine how much was spent in 2013-2014 on district children with disabilities and verify this amount is equal to or exceeds the amount calculated in section e. above (FUNDS 01-09, 13, 61-62 ONLY) Item 19 TOTAL MINIMUM AMOUNT THAT MUST BE SPENT BEFORE USING PART B FUNDS (Excess Cost) #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 2013-2014 expenditures - State & Local Funds Spent for Children With Disabilities - RS 0000-2999; 6000-9999 Item 20* and Goal 5XXX $ - $ - $ - Item 21** Amount spent on children with disabilities in excess of requirement* #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! * Note: Item 20 is not the same as line 9 above. Line 20 is the 2013-2014 expenditure amount. Line 10 is 2012-2013 expenditure amount, Does not include SACS supplemental form (PCRAF). Information from the PCRAF is not included in this worksheet. ** Note: Item 21 should be a positive amount. If it is a negative then the LEA has not met the excess cost requirement and may not use any of their federal IDEA Part B funds. Authorized Business Official Printed Name: Authorized Business Official Signature: Date: Special Ed Director/Designee Printed Name: Special Ed Director/Designee Signature: Date: Page 2 of 2

SAN MATEO COUNTY SELPA District NUMBER OF FULL-TIME SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENT EQUIVALENTS CALCULATOR (FTE of time spent in special education) FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 Total Percentage Percentage Percentage Special Education in in Special of Pupil Count General Special Education Time by Percentage * Education Education FTE 0% to 10% 10% 90% 0.00 11% to 20% 20% 80% 0.00 21% to 30% 30% 70% 0.00 31% to 40% 40% 60% 0.00 41% to 50% 50% 50% 0.00 51% to 60% 60% 40% 0.00 61% to 70% 70% 30% 0.00 71% to 80% 80% 20% 0.00 81% to 90% 90% 10% 0.00 91% to 100% 99% 1% 0.00 Total 0 n/a n/a 0.00 ** NOTE: FILL IN YELLOW HIGHLIGHTED CELLS ONLY * Enter total pupil count by percent of time ** Enter this value in Item 17 of Excess Cost Calculation Worksheet