Lake Mills Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Similar documents
Freedom Area School District Community Survey Results. Fall 2018

West Bend School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Muskego Norway Schools Community Survey Results. Fall 2015

Beaver Dam Unified School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2016

Marathon School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

School District of West De Pere Community Survey Results. Fall 2017

School District of Horicon Community Survey Results. Fall 2017

Barneveld School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2017

Oakfield School District Community Survey Results. Fall 2018

Burlington Area School District Community Survey Results. Winter 2016

School District of Somerset Community Survey Results. Fall 2015

76% The comprehensive solution put forward by the Community Steering Committee addresses a wide variety of needs at the high school:

Public Presentation Capital Bond November 27, 2017

APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY USE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES

Sheboygan Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2016

2017 Bond Program Summary

POJOAQUE VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT October 12, 2016

BELLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AS CONSTRUCTOR

Tomah Area School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2015

DISTRICT HISTORY Referendum ($585,000) Purchase of 10 Acres / Football Field Original junior high building (present old section of MS)

MUROC JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT KERN COUNTY NORTH EDWARDS, CALIFORNIA

Progress Update Identified Needs & Capital Plan

Tumwater University School District Budget Myths Bond Project Update. February 2016 Mel Murray, Director of Capital Projects John Bash, Superintendent

Performance Audit on 2008 and 2013 SPLOST Revenues For the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2012

School Referendum Results School Amount Type of Debt Description Arrowhead UHS Failed

CANYONS DISTRICT FACILITY USE

Ballot Measures-T Section

Gillett School District Community Survey Results. Spring 2018

Asst. Supt. Office, c/o 524 Broad Street, Wadsworth, OH Facility Use and Rental Information (Policy 7510)

Ballot Measures-N 7. Centralia Elementary School District, Building Strong Neighborhood Schools

Cafeteria Parking Lot Library Kitchen/Preparing* Auditorium Stadium (No Lights) Kitchen/Serving* Gymnasium Stadium (Lights)

Bond Amount: $18,470,000. Proposed I&S Tax Rate Increase: $.3180

PROPOSITION FARMINGTON SCHOOLS. April 8, 2014 Bond Issue

SOMIS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL* BOND MEASURE S SOMIS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT TAX RATE STATEMENT BOND MEASURE S

Hayfield Community Schools Bond Referendum. Vote Monday, September 11, Our Schools Our Communities Our Future

Welcome. Dr. Buck Gilcrease Alvin ISD Superintendent. David Becker Paul Ingamells CAC Co-Chairs

Understanding the Costs: Frequently Asked Questions

CIP FY2015 FY2019 Requests SCH-1, SCH-2 and SCH-5

Proposed Final Budget Presentation (May 14, 2018) SELINSGROVE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Contents Ballot Measure... 2 Full Text Ballot Proposition... 3 Tax Rate Statement... 7 Impartial Analysis... 8 Statement in Favor of Measure...

APPENDIX A FULL TEXT OF BOND MEASURE

LAKE CENTRAL SCHOOL CORPORATION USE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES

Barnesville Public Schools Proposed Building Program

INTRODUCTION. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. CERTIFICATION

Page Item 165 Overview 167 Revenue 168 Expenditures 169 Elementary School Allocation 171 Middle School Allocation 173 High School Allocation 175

Facility and Financial Overview. Brandywine Heights Area School District

Investing in Our Schools:

Facility Requested: Date Entry time: Exit time:

Physical Plant. Five-Year Capital Budget Plan. State College Area School District November Page 1 of 15

Page Item 174 Overview 175 Revenue 177 Expenditures 178 Elementary School Allocation 180 Middle School Allocation 181 High School Allocation 182

Contents. Ballot Measure Full Text Ballot Proposition Tax Rate Statement Impartial Analysis Statement in Favor of Measure...

Comprehensive Facilities Assessment School Committee

APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY USE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES

Santa Barbara Community College District Measure V Bond Construction Fund Financial Statements and Agreed-Upon Procedures Year Ended June 30, 2013

Building and Site Sinking Fund Millage. Election Date: November 7th 2017

INTRODUCTION. Summary of revenue/expenditures available for new construction and remodeling projects only. CERTIFICATION

PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 48 (SEA TO SKY)

School District of Manawa Community Survey Results. Winter

6.0 Support Facilities Element

LAKE CENTRAL SCHOOL CORPORATION USE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Action Item. Sid Albaugh, Assistant Superintendent Business Services. Consideration of Approval of 2018 Measure A - Facilities Project List

E. Public and private educational institutions who have the majority of their membership from Township High School District 211.

Construction Total. Subtotal: $ 863,540 $ 172,708 $ 124,350 $ 1,160,598 $ 232,120 $ 1,392,717

Barnesville Public Schools Proposed Building Program

Santa Barbara Community College District Measure V Bond Construction Fund Financial Statements and Agreed-Upon Procedures Year Ended June 30, 2015

Richland School District

HUENEME ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL* BOND MEASURE T

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs)

Community Budget Workshop Broad Street School April 4, Preliminary School Budget

Capital Projects Completed since 1988

PROPOSED TEN-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2019 Capital Projects Plan

Why did we undertake a comprehensive Educational Facility Master Plan?

Oak Park and River Forest High School Five-Year Facilities Plan and Referendum Overview and Frequently Asked Questions

Lebanon Public Schools Board of Education Budget Presentation

JACKSON-MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM FUND #177 EDUCATION CAPITAL 5-YEAR PLAN (WORKING COPY)

Community Budget Workshop Erin Town Hall March 8, Preliminary School Budget

KIMBERLY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT

REQUEST FOR USE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES. Depew Union Free School District Depew, NY (716)

University of Houston System

Sherman Independent School District Use of District Facilities Management Policies and Guidelines

October 4, 2007 Page 1 of 8

Page Item 153 Overview 154 Revenues 156 Expenditures 157 Elementary School Allocation 158 Middle School Allocation 159 High School Allocation 160

MT. SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT PROPOSITION 39, GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS (MEASURE R, NOVEMBER 2001) PERFORMANCE AUDIT.

Budget Workshop #3

Pennsbury School District School Board Policy

Eric Hawkes, Director, University Recreation, North Carolina State University

Central Michigan University Capital Budget

Corvallis School District 509J

OXNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY COUNTY COUNSEL* BOND MEASURE R OXNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT TAX RATE STATEMENT BOND MEASURE R

RECOMMENDATION. c. Approve a total project cost of $3,300,000

Gov's Planning Estimates Project Title Rank Fund Project Requests for State Funds

Consolidated 1028/Preliminary Determination Hearing

Wissahickon School District Ambler, PA FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA. February 21, :30 pm Administration Building Board Room

Campus Facilities Use Procedures

Governing Board Bond Update. Measure G Bond Program. for. Solano Community College District

Chabot College Project List Biology Building Phase 1 $0 $0 $0 Measure B $0 $0 $0 Measure A 2016 $0 $0 $0

Transcription:

Lake Mills Area School District Community Survey Results Spring 2018

Survey Summary The survey was conducted in late May through mid-june of 2018. Residents within the District were mailed a paper survey. Each survey included a unique survey access code for those who preferred to take the survey online. Total responses = 942 (338 paper) Participation rate = 19%

Respondent Information

What is your age? 30% 30% 25% 22% 20% 18% 15% 14% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1% 18-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-64 65 and older

Do you live in the Lake Mills Area School District? 0.43% 6% 94% Yes No Not sure

In which municipality do you reside? 100% 80% 60% 61% 40% 20% 22% 5% 4% 4% 2% 1% 1% 0%

Are you an employee of the Lake Mills Area School District? 14% 86% Yes (n=133) No (n=809)

Do you have children attending school in the Lake Mills Area School District? 50% 50% Yes (n=469) No (n=473)

Please mark ALL other relationships you have with the Lake Mills Area School District: 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 40% 31% 28% 24% 19% 10% 0%

If you have school-aged children, what school(s) do they attend? Lake Mills Elementary School 45% Lake Mills Middle School 42% Lake Mills High School 39% Private school 4% Other 4% Public school outside of District 2% Home-school 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

How would you like to receive information from the District? Email District mailings School/District website Instant/Text messaging Facebook Lake Mills Leader Automated phone messenger Attend meetings Parent organizations Attend School Board meetings TV/Cable Watertown Daily Times Jefferson Daily Union Other 27% 25% 35% 5% 35% 16% 31% 28% 2% 17% 7% 14% 2% 7% 5% 6% 7% 3% 13% 3% 8% 2% 1% 1% 45% 54% 65% 90% Non-Parents (Non-Staff) Parents (Non-Staff) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Overall Satisfaction with the Lake Mills Area School District

How well is the District doing in the following areas? Great (4), Good (3), Fair (2), Poor (1) Item Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff) Building pride in our community 3.50 3.23 3.00 Delivering a high-quality educational experience 3.40 3.03 2.91 Preparing students for life after high school 3.21 2.88 2.91 Maintaining school facilities 2.99 3.05 2.79 Keeping the public informed 3.24 2.98 2.70 Spending tax dollars wisely 3.11 2.83 2.50

Overall, how satisfied are you with the Lake Mills Area School District? (All Respondents) 100% 80% 60% 53% 40% 28% 20% 0% 8% 9% 2% Very satisfied Satisfied Not satisfied Very unsatisfied No opinion

Facility Planning Background Information

Updating and expanding the high school has been identified as the next phase of the District s Facility Master Plan. This phase would address the following needs: 1. Expand Capacity to Meet Enrollment Growth In 2016, the District hired an independent firm to develop student enrollment projections using only resident students. Resident enrollment projections indicate: The High School is projected to be over capacity in two years. The Middle School will be over capacity in four years. The Elementary School will be over capacity in six years. It is important to note that it will take two years after a referendum is approved before school construction is completed. 2. Expand and Update High School Classrooms and Labs The High School needs more general education (English, math, social studies) classrooms as well as updated space for tech ed (shop), agriculture, and family and consumer science. Academic support areas such as the library (LMC), cafeteria and gym also require updates and additional space. 3. Update Indoor and Outdoor Athletic Areas Currently, the High School baseball and football fields are at the Middle School. Due to the age and location of fields (built into a hill), there are significant updates needed as well as ongoing safety concerns. Additionally, the Middle School location creates challenges for scheduling, transportation and student supervision. There is also a growing demand for gym space to meet the needs of community and youth recreation programming. If the public chooses to address any of these projects, the primary way to obtain funding is through a capital referendum.

What advice would you give the School Board regarding updating District facilities? (Lake Mills Area School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 91% 80% 70% 78% 60% 56% 40% 20% 0% Explore a referendum to fund the next phase of the District's Facility Master Plan 25% 14% 16% 7% 2% Do nothing at this time 7% 15% Not sure/need more information 19% All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff)

High School Updates

The District explored building a new high school. However, the preliminary cost estimate of $86 million exceeds the District s borrowing capacity. Therefore, the School Board and Administration is recommending the following projects at the high school: Add six classrooms with flexible instructional areas. Renovate and update the agriculture areas to support class offerings in ag science, horticulture, veterinarian science as well as the technical education (shop) areas to support class offerings in building and construction, metals, woods, small power equipment, welding, engineering and architectural design. Renovate the library to create student collaboration and small group instruction areas. Relocate and expand the weight room with separate exterior access. The cost to address the projects identified above is approximately $6.9 million.

Would you support a $6.9 million referendum to address high school projects? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $46 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. All Taxpayers Definitely yes Probably yes 30% 40% 70% Yes Undecided 11% Probably no Definitely no 8% 11% 19% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support a $6.9 million referendum to address high school projects? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $46 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Staff Taxpayers Definitely yes Probably yes 33% 54% 87% Yes Undecided 6% Probably no Definitely no 3% 4% 7% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support a $6.9 million referendum to address high school projects? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $46 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes Probably yes 30% 49% 79% Yes Undecided 8% Probably no Definitely no 6% 7% 13% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support a $6.9 million referendum to address high school projects? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $46 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes Probably yes 27% 29% 56% Yes Undecided 16% Probably no Definitely no 11% 17% 28% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Additional Analysis for the $6.9 million referendum Assuming percent of Resident Population Assumptions - Non-parent/non-staff = 75% - Parents = 25% - Staff < 1% Of those responding either Definitely Yes, or Probably Yes:.25(79%) +.75 (56%) = 61.75% Assuming carrying 1/3 of Undecided:.25(81%) +.75 (61%) = 66.00%

Additional Projects for Consideration

1. Additional Gym and Indoor Athletic Support Areas There is a growing demand for gym space to meet the needs of community and youth recreation programming. Updates are also needed to the locker rooms to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) code requirements. The project would: Build a 3-court competition gym Provide additional space for practices, athletic events and large school or community events Provide space for community programs (i.e., senior walking, adult/youth evening basketball, volleyball, etc.) Renovate locker rooms Add parking spaces Add a dedicated entrance Relocate the bus barn Reconfigure the lower gym into the weight room Estimated cost: $8 million

Would you support an $8 million referendum to add a gym and indoor athletic support areas? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $62 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. All Taxpayers Definitely yes Probably yes 23% 23% 46% Yes Undecided 17% Probably no Definitely no 15% 22% 37% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support an $8 million referendum to add a gym and indoor athletic support areas? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $62 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Staff Taxpayers Definitely yes Probably yes 27% 32% 59% Yes Undecided 18% Probably no Definitely no 8% 15% 23% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support an $8 million referendum to add a gym and indoor athletic support areas? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $62 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes Probably yes 24% 33% 57% Yes Undecided 16% Probably no Definitely no 11% 16% 27% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support an $8 million referendum to add a gym and indoor athletic support areas? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $62 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes Probably yes 11% 18% 29% Yes Undecided 19% Probably no Definitely no 20% 32% 52% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Additional Analysis for the $8 million referendum Assuming percent of Resident Population Assumptions - Non-parent/non-staff = 75% - Parents = 25% - Staff < 1% Of those responding either Definitely Yes, or Probably Yes:.25(59%) +.75 (29%) = 36.5% Assuming carrying 1/3 of Undecided:.25(61%) +.75 (35%) = 41.5%

2. Outdoor Athletics After studying the various options, the District is recommending relocating the football field and building an outdoor athletic complex at the High School. The project could include: Installing a multi-use artificial turf field for football, soccer and physical education classes, as well as outdoor activities such as marching band practice Building a press box and installing a lighting and sound system Adding bleachers and parking Resurfacing and expanding the track, including field events Expansion of existing concession stand restrooms In addition, the project could include: Partnering with the City to relocate the baseball field to Wallace Park Converting the existing Middle School field to greenspace, playgrounds and recreation use Estimated cost: up to $3.275 million

When do you feel the District should relocate the football field to the High School campus? (Lake Mills Area School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 52% 43% 33% 18% 29% 26% 28% 30% 32% 21% 20% 14% 17% 13% 15% 9% 0% As soon as possible Within the next 10 years Never Undecided All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff)

Would you support a $3.275 million referendum that provides funding to build an outdoor athletic complex as? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $25 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. All Taxpayers Definitely yes 29% Probably yes 24% 53% Yes Undecided 15% Probably no Definitely no 13% 19% 32% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support a $3.275 million referendum that provides funding to build an outdoor athletic complex as? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $25 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Staff Taxpayers Definitely yes 40% Probably yes 32% 72% Yes Undecided 14% Probably no Definitely no 4% 10% 14% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support a $3.275 million referendum that provides funding to build an outdoor athletic complex as? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $25 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 42% Probably yes 23% 65% Yes Undecided 12% Probably no Definitely no 10% 13% 23% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support a $3.275 million referendum that provides funding to build an outdoor athletic complex as? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $25 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 12% Probably yes 22% 34% Yes Undecided 18% Probably no Definitely no 17% 31% 48% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Additional Analysis for the $3.275 million referendum Assuming percent of Resident Population Assumptions - Non-parent/non-staff = 75% - Parents = 25% - Staff < 1% Of those responding either Definitely Yes, or Probably Yes:.25(65%) +.75 (34%) = 41.75% Assuming carrying 1/3 of Undecided:.25(69%) +.75 (40%) = 47.25%

Athletic Field Repairs If the community does not support building a new outdoor athletic complex at the High School campus, an investment of $700,000 will be needed to: Repair retaining wall and walkway Replace press box Please note: This option would not increase parking or seating.

Would you support a $700,000 referendum that provides funding to update the athletic fields at the Middle School? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $5 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. All Taxpayers Definitely yes 27% Probably yes 29% 56% Yes Undecided 15% Probably no Definitely no 15% 14% 29% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support a $700,000 referendum that provides funding to update the athletic fields at the Middle School? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $5 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Staff Taxpayers Definitely yes 23% Probably yes 30% 53% Yes Undecided 21% Probably no Definitely no 11% 15% 26% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support a $700,000 referendum that provides funding to update the athletic fields at the Middle School? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $5 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 34% Probably yes 26% 60% Yes Undecided 15% Probably no Definitely no 14% 11% 25% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Would you support a $700,000 referendum that provides funding to update the athletic fields at the Middle School? Representing an estimated annual tax increase of $5 for each $100,000 of property value amortized over 20 years. Non-Parent Taxpayers (Non-Staff) Definitely yes 20% Probably yes 31% 51% Yes Undecided 16% Probably no Definitely no 16% 17% 33% No 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Additional Analysis for the $700,000 referendum Assuming percent of Resident Population Assumptions - Non-parent/non-staff = 75% - Parents = 25% - Staff < 1% Of those responding either Definitely Yes, or Probably Yes:.25(60%) +.75 (51%) = 53.25% Assuming carrying 1/3 of Undecided:.25(65%) +.75 (56%) = 58.25%

Project Prioritization

Which project do you believe is a higher priority? (Lake Mills Area School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 80% 60% 40% 31% 49% 31% 40% 34% 35% 35% 26% 29% 27% 48% 20% 16% 0% Updating the outdoor athletic complex Building a gym and indoor athletic support areas Undecided/No opinion All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff)

Swimming Pool Lake Mills residents have talked about the need for a swimming pool for many years. Based on similar projects in neighboring districts, construction of an indoor pool would cost approximately $10 to $12 million. In addition, it would cost approximately $150,000 annually to heat, clean and supervise the pool, which would need to be funded outside of the current budget.

Would you support the District exploring a referendum that would cost $10-$12 million to build an indoor swimming pool? (Lake Mills Area School District Taxpayers Only) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 40% 35% 53% 28% 45% 42% 34% 57% 15% 23% 13% 15% 0% Yes No Undecided All Taxpayers Staff Parents (Non-Staff) Non-Parents (Non-Staff)

Thank you!