Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 3-2009 A Chartbook of International Labor Comparisons U.S. Department of Labor Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace Thank you for downloading an article from DigitalCommons@ILR. Support this valuable resource today! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Key Workplace Documents at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Federal Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.
A Chartbook of International Labor Comparisons Abstract [Excerpt] This chartbook focuses on the labor market situation in selected countries for the most recent year available; some charts also show trends. Charts in sections 1-4 and section 6 include countries in North America (the, Canada, and Mexico) and selected Asian-Pacific and European economies. Some countries do not appear on all charts due to the lack of suitable data. It should also be noted that the selected economies are not representative of all of Europe and the Asian-Pacific region; rather, they tend to be the more industrialized economies in these regions. Weighted aggregates for 15 European Union countries (EU-15) also are shown on many of the charts in these sections. These represent European Union member countries prior to the expansion of the European Union to 25 countries on May 1, 2004, and to 27 countries on January 1, 2007. The EU-15 countries are Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. In section 5, several indicators are presented for six large emerging economies: Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, the Russian Federation, and South Africa. The appendix describes the definitions, sources, and methods used to compile the data in the chartbook. For some series, the appendix provides cautions about the exact comparability of the measures. Keywords labor market, international labor markets, economic growth, Europe, Department of Labor Comments Suggested Citation U. S. Department of Labor. (2009). A chartbook of international labor comparisons. Washington, DC: Author. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/606/ This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/606
A CHARTBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LABOR COMPARISONS MARCH 2009 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Material contained in this document is in the public domain and may be reproduced, fully or partially, without permission of the Federal Government. Source credit is requested. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.bls.gov/ilc/chartbook2009/home.htm. To receive notice of future editions of this chartbook and international data comparisons produced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), send an email with subscribe in the subject line to ILCPR@bls.gov.
A CHARTBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LABOR COMPARISONS MARCH 2009 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
FOREWORD The U.S. Department of Labor fosters and promotes the welfare of America s job seekers, wage earners, and retirees by improving their working conditions, advancing their opportunities for profitable employment, and protecting their retirement and health-care benefits. We also help employers find workers, strengthen free collective bargaining, and track changes in employment, prices, and other national economic measurements. I hope you find this Chartbook useful in your own work, and that you share it with your colleagues. Hilda L. Solis Secretary of Labor The aspirations guiding our mission to enhance the well-being and productivity of working people are shared worldwide. Governments across the globe are grappling with a worldwide recession and its impact on their workers, their families, and their communities. As we confront these challenges, it is useful to track how key labor market and other national economic measurements compare, so as to gauge trends and to provide government officials and citizens worldwide the opportunity to learn from each other. This Chartbook is a gateway to explore the wealth of data produced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Division of International Labor Comparisons and the international labor policy and research programs maintained by the Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB). For more information, please visit http://www.bls.gov/ilc/ and http://www.dol.gov/ilab/. Foreword i
PREFACE This chartbook focuses on the labor market situation in selected countries for the most recent year available; some charts also show trends. Charts in sections 1-4 and section 6 include countries in North America (the United States, Canada, and Mexico) and selected Asian- Pacific and European economies. Some countries do not appear on all charts due to the lack of suitable data. It should also be noted that the selected economies are not representative of all of Europe and the Asian- Pacific region; rather, they tend to be the more industrialized economies in these regions. Weighted aggregates for 15 European Union countries (EU-15) also are shown on many of the charts in these sections. These represent European Union member countries prior to the expansion of the European Union to 25 countries on May 1, 2004, and to 27 countries on January 1, 2007. The EU-15 countries are Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. In section 5, several indicators are presented for six large emerging economies: Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, the Russian Federation, and South Africa. The appendix describes the definitions, sources, and methods used to compile the data in the chartbook. For some series, the appendix provides cautions about the exact comparability of the measures. Section 1, on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, portrays overall measures of comparative living standards. Section 2 highlights the state of the labor market by comparing major labor force, employment, and unemployment indicators. Section 3 examines the competitive position of the in the global marketplace by comparing hourly compensation costs in manufacturing, trends in manufacturing labor productivity and unit labor costs, and manufacturing output as a percent of world manufacturing output. Section 4 includes charts that compare public expenditures on labor market programs, regulation measures on labor and product markets, taxes on labor, and trade in goods. Section 5 presents charts on various topics for large emerging economies. Section 6 presents a visual abstract of the 2008 Employment Outlook published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The Employment Outlook is an annual publication that explores recent labor market developments of interest to the 30 OECD member countries. This final section is the second of a series of one-time supplemental sections that highlight topics of particular interest, but with occasional data availability. The chartbook was a cooperative effort of three agencies in the Department of Labor: the Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB), http://www.dol.gov/ilab/; the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy (OASP), http://www.dol.gov/asp/; and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), http://www.bls.gov/. Since 1960, BLS has adjusted selected labor market data of foreign countries to improve their comparability with U.S. data. The chartbook is representative of the main output of the BLS program of international labor comparisons. In order to increase country and indicator coverage, BLS data are supplemented by data from OECD and other international organizations. A team led by Jennifer Raynor of the BLS Division of International Labor Comparisons (ILC), http://www.bls.gov/ilc/, in cooperation with Kenneth Swinnerton and Sarah Donovan of the ILAB Division of Economic and Labor Research prepared the chartbook. The following persons comprised the BLS team: Rich Esposito, Mubarka Haq, Wolodar Lysko, Andrew Petajan, Jessica Sincavage, Marie-Claire Sodergren, and Chris Sparks. Constance Sorrentino, Division Chief of ILC, and Ronald Bird, David Langdon, and Stephanie Swirsky of OASP provided overall guidance. Preface iii
CONTENTS SECTION 1 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT PER CAPITA... 1 1.1 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, 2007... 2 1.2 Average annual growth rates for real GDP per capita, 1997-2007... 3 SECTION 2 LABOR MARKET INDICATORS... 5 2.1 Size of the labor force, 2007... 6 2.2 Average annual growth rates for the labor force, 1997-2007... 7 2.3 Labor force participation rates by sex, 2007... 8 2.4 Labor force participation rates for youths, 2007... 9 2.5 Labor force participation rates for older workers, 2007... 10 2.6 Employment as a percent of the working-age population, 2007... 11 2.7 Average annual growth rates for employment, 1997-2007... 12 2.8 Average annual growth rates for full-time and part-time employment, 1996-2006... 13 2.9 Annual hours worked per employed person, 1997 and 2007... 14 2.10 Unemployment rates, 2007... 15 2.11 Unemployment rates for youths, 2007... 16 2.12 Unemployment rates for youths and adults, 2007... 17 2.13 Persons unemployed one year or longer as a percent of total unemployment, 2007... 18 2.14 Ratios of unemployment rates of persons without high school degrees to those of persons with college or university degrees, 2006... 19 2.15 Educational attainment of the adult population, 2006... 20 SECTION 3 COMPETITIVENESS INDICATORS FOR MANUFACTURING... 21 3.1 Hourly compensation costs, 2006... 22 3.2 Average annual growth rates for hourly compensation costs, 1996-2006... 23 3.3 Employer social insurance expenditures and other labor taxes as a percent of hourly compensation costs, 2006... 24 3.4 Average annual growth rates for manufacturing productivity, 1997-2007... 25 3.5 Average annual growth rates for manufacturing output and hours worked, 1997-2007... 26 3.6 Average annual growth rates for manufacturing unit labor costs in U.S. dollars, 1997-2007... 27 3.7 Manufacturing output as a percent of world manufacturing output, 2007... 28 SECTION 4 OTHER ECONOMIC INDICATORS... 29 4.1 Public expenditures on labor market programs as a percent of GDP, 2006... 30 4.2 Measures of regulation on labor and product markets, 2003... 31 4.3 Shares of labor costs taken by tax and social security contributions, 2007... 32 4.4 Dependency ratios, 2006 and projections to 2025... 33 4.5 Trade in goods as a percent of GDP, 2007... 34 iv Contents
CONTENTS (cont.) SECTION 5 INDICATORS FOR LARGE EMERGING ECONOMIES... 35 5.1 World population distribution, 2007... 36 5.2 Age composition of the population, 2006... 37 5.3 Dependency ratios, 2006 and projections to 2025... 38 5.4 GDP per capita, 2007... 39 5.5 GDP per employed person, 1995 and 2005... 40 5.6 Labor force participation rates by age, 2007... 41 5.7 Employment as a percent of the working-age population by sex, 2006... 42 5.8 Trade in goods as a percent of GDP, 2007... 43 5.9 Manufacturing output as a percent of world manufacturing output, 2007... 44 SECTION 6 EMPLOYMENT OUTLOOK INDICATORS... 45 6.1 Part-time employment for youths as a percent of total employment for youths, 1996 and 2006... 46 6.2 Employment as a percent of the prime-age population by sex, 2007... 47 6.3 Ratios of psychological distress rates of workers in low-skilled occupations to those of all employed persons... 48 6.4 Shares of global foreign direct investment expenditures and receipts, 1995, 2000, and 2005... 49 APPENDIX DEFINITIONS, SOURCES, AND METHODS... A1 Contents v
SECTION 1 Gross Domestic Product Per Capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, when converted to U.S. dollars using Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs), is the most widely used income measure for international comparisons of living standards. It should be recognized that income measures do not capture a number of variables affecting economic well-being, such as leisure time, health, safety, and cultural resources. PPPs are the number of foreign currency units required to buy goods and services in a foreign country equivalent to what can be bought with one dollar in the. These are used to equalize the purchasing power of different currencies. PPPs are used instead of exchange rates because market exchange rates do not necessarily reflect the relative purchasing power of different currencies. Charts 1.1 and 1.2 compare the level of GDP per capita in the most recent year and the trend over the past 10 years for 20 of the 22 economies shown on various charts in this chartbook. A weighted aggregate for 15 European Union countries (EU-15) also is included on both charts. Gross Domestic Product Per Capita 1
1.1 Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, 2007 converted at PPP rates Norway had the highest GDP per capita, followed by the, Ireland, and Hong Kong SAR. The other economies showed levels of GDP per capita between 84 percent (Netherlands) and 28 percent (Mexico) of the U.S. level. Norway 55.2 Ireland Hong Kong SAR 43.0 42.3 45.8 Netherlands Canada Austria Denmark Sweden Australia United Kingdom Germany Japan EU-15 France Spain Italy 38.6 38.2 37.8 36.5 36.3 36.1 34.8 33.7 33.5 33.0 32.7 30.3 29.8 New Zealand Korea, Rep. of Portugal 21.8 26.1 24.8 Mexico 12.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Thousands of U.S. dollars NOTE: Hong Kong SAR stands for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China. Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is the number of foreign currency units required to buy goods and services in a foreign country equivalent to what can be bought with one dollar in the. SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and World Bank. 2 Gross Domestic Product Per Capita
1.2 Average annual growth rates for real GDP per capita, 1997-2007 In most of the economies, real GDP per capita grew during the decade at an average rate of 1.3 to 2.5 percent per year; the U.S. growth rate was in the middle of the range, at 1.8 percent per year. Ireland registered the greatest increase in real GDP per capita, followed by the Republic of Korea; Italy and Japan had the smallest increases. Ireland 5.0 Korea, Rep. of 3.8 Hong Kong SAR Sweden 2.9 3.1 Spain United Kingdom Canada Australia Mexico New Zealand Netherlands Austria EU-15 Norway France Denmark Germany Portugal 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 Japan Italy 1.0 1.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Percent NOTE: 1997-2006 for Mexico and New Zealand. Hong Kong SAR stands for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China. SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics, including special tabulations using data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and national sources. Gross Domestic Product Per Capita 3
SECTION 2 Labor Market Indicators Charts 2.1-2.15 show comparisons of the labor force, employment, unemployment, and related indicators. The size of the labor force is shown in chart 2.1. Labor force growth (chart 2.2) sums up changes in both employment and unemployment over the period. Labor force participation rates (charts 2.3-2.5) measure the share of the population that is working or unemployed. Here, comparisons are shown by sex and for four selected age groups relating to youths and older workers. Employment and unemployment are key indicators of the functioning of labor markets both within and among countries. Charts 2.6-2.9 compare the proportion of the working-age population employed, employment growth rates, trends in full-time and part-time employment, and trends in annual hours worked per employed person. Charts 2.10-2.15 explore unemployment rates, long-duration unemployment, and the connection between unemployment rates and levels of education. Nineteen countries are covered in this section. In addition, a weighted aggregate for 15 European Union countries (EU-15) is shown on the majority of charts. Labor Market Indicators 5
2.1 Size of the labor force, 2007 The U.S. labor force was the largest. The EU-15 countries combined had a larger labor force than the. EU-15 186.3 153.1 Japan 66.1 Mexico Germany 44.0 41.4 United Kingdom France Italy Korea, Rep. of Spain Canada Australia Netherlands Portugal Sweden Austria Denmark Norway New Zealand Ireland 30.8 27.5 24.5 24.2 22.1 17.7 10.9 8.7 5.6 4.8 4.2 2.9 2.5 2.2 2.2 0 40 80 120 160 200 Millions SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 6 Labor Market Indicators
2.2 Average annual growth rates for the labor force, 1997-2007 U.S. labor force growth outpaced that of the EU-15 average. In Europe, labor force growth was stronger in Ireland, Spain, Portugal, and the Netherlands than in the United States. The labor force declined only in Japan. Ireland 3.7 Spain 3.1 Mexico Australia Canada New Zealand 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 Portugal 1.5 Netherlands Korea, Rep. of EU-15 Norway France Sweden Austria United Kingdom Italy 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 Germany Denmark 0.5 0.2 Japan -0.2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Percent SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Labor Market Indicators 7
2.3 Labor force participation rates by sex, 2007 In Denmark, New Zealand, the Netherlands, and Australia, women participated in the labor force at about the same high rate as U.S. women. Canadian women had the highest participation rates, while Italian and Mexican women had the lowest. Participation rates for men were at least 70 percent in 11 out of 19 countries; the lowest rates for men were found in Italy and France. Canada Norway Sweden Denmark New Zealand Netherlands Australia United Kingdom Portugal Ireland 62.7 61.5 61.3 60.1 60.0 59.3 59.0 59.0 56.5 56.2 54.1 72.9 70.2 69.5 69.8 74.7 73.2 73.0 73.1 70.7 69.3 73.3 Austria 52.6 67.7 Germany 51.6 65.6 France 51.5 62.5 Women Men Korea, Rep. of 50.6 71.5 EU-15 49.5 64.8 Spain 48.0 68.0 Japan 47.9 72.9 Mexico 43.5 76.5 Italy 37.9 60.3 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 8 Labor Market Indicators
2.4 Labor force participation rates for youths, 2007 Labor force participation rates varied widely for teenagers, ranging from 7.2 percent (the Republic of Korea) to 63.3 percent (Denmark). Persons ages 20 to 24 participated in the labor market to a much greater extent than teenagers, with the highest participation rates in Denmark and Australia. Denmark Netherlands Australia 59.5 63.3 61.0 82.6 80.4 81.9 New Zealand Canada United Kingdom 53.2 56.3 55.1 74.4 75.4 78.4 Austria Norway Sweden 45.4 43.1 41.3 39.7 75.4 75.7 74.4 73.1 Mexico 35.8 61.5 Germany Spain EU-15 Ireland 32.5 29.7 29.4 27.0 71.3 67.4 66.7 75.1 Portugal 17.1 63.4 Japan 16.3 69.7 France 15.3 61.8 Italy 11.0 49.8 Ages 15-19 Ages 20-24 Korea, Rep. of 7.2 52.7 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent NOTE: Persons ages 16 to 19 instead of ages 15 to 19 for Norway, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Labor Market Indicators 9
2.5 Labor force participation rates for older workers, 2007 Persons ages 55 to 64 participated in the labor market far less in Italy, Austria, and France than in the remaining countries. Participation rates for persons ages 65 and over varied widely from 1.4 percent (France) to 31.3 percent (the Republic of Korea); the U.S. rate was nearly four times higher than the EU-15 average. New Zealand Sweden Norway 11.3 14.2 15.4 69.7 73.1 73.0 Japan 20.1 68.4 16.0 63.8 Korea, Rep. of 31.3 62.0 Denmark 5.3 61.3 Canada United Kingdom Australia Germany 8.9 7.0 8.8 3.7 60.1 59.3 58.3 57.2 Mexico 28.1 55.6 Ireland 9.4 55.5 Portugal 18.2 54.4 Netherlands 5.0 52.2 EU-15 4.2 49.2 Spain 2.0 47.4 France Austria 1.4 4.8 40.4 39.8 Ages 65+ Ages 55-64 Italy 3.3 34.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Percent SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 10 Labor Market Indicators
2.6 Employment as a percent of the working-age population, 2007 New Zealand, Canada, and Norway had the highest percentages of the working-age population employed. In Italy, less than half of the working-age population was employed. New Zealand Canada Norway Netherlands Australia Denmark Sweden Ireland United Kingdom Korea, Rep. of Japan Portugal Mexico Austria 64.7 64.2 64.1 63.8 63.1 63.0 62.3 61.3 60.8 60.0 59.0 57.6 57.5 57.5 57.2 Germany Spain EU-15 France 53.3 53.0 52.9 51.8 Italy 45.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Percent NOTE: The working-age population is defined as persons ages 15 and over for all countries except Canada, France, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the, where it is defined as persons ages 16 and over. SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Labor Market Indicators 11
2.7 Average annual growth rates for employment, 1997-2007 Ireland and Spain had the highest growth rates for employment. Employment declined only in Japan. U.S. employment growth outpaced that of 5 of the 12 European countries, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. Ireland Spain 4.3 4.3 Australia Canada New Zealand Mexico 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 Netherlands EU-15 Portugal Sweden Italy France Norway Korea, Rep. of United Kingdom Austria 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 Germany Denmark 0.4 0.6 Japan -0.2-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Percent SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 12 Labor Market Indicators
2.8 Average annual growth rates for full-time and parttime employment, 1996-2006 Full-time employment grew faster than part-time employment in six countries, including the. Average annual growth rates for full-time employment were highest in Spain, followed by Ireland, Mexico, and Canada. Spain 3.5 8.1 Ireland Mexico 2.5 2.4 2.5 6.7 Canada 1.5 2.2 New Zealand 1.9 1.6 Australia Portugal 0.3 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.7 Full-time Part-time Sweden 1.1 0.0 Norway 1.1 0.8 France 1.0 0.4 Netherlands 0.9 3.8 EU-15 0.7 2.9 Italy 0.6 4.7 Korea, Rep. of 0.5 8.4 United Kingdom 0.4 0.7 Denmark 0.4 1.4 Austria -0.4 5.1 Germany -0.5 4.4 Japan -0.6 0.9-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 Percent NOTE: 1996-2004 for Mexico. Full-time employment is defined as persons usually working over 30 hours per week in their main job. U.S. data refer to wage and salary workers only. Data for other countries refer to total employment, which includes wage and salary workers, self-employed persons, and unpaid family workers. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Labor Market Indicators 13
2.9 Annual hours worked per employed person, 1997 and 2007 In both years, Koreans worked the most hours annually. The Republic of Korea and Ireland experienced the largest reductions in annual hours worked per employed person. Hours worked increased only in Denmark. Korea, Rep. of Mexico Italy Japan New Zealand Canada Portugal Australia United Kingdom Spain Austria Ireland Denmark Sweden France Germany Norway Netherlands 1927 1871 1863 1824 1842 1794 1865 1785 1821 1771 1767 1736 1812 1728 1795 1722 1740 1670 1728 1652 1668 1652 1832 1630 1544 1574 1675 1562 1649 1561 1509 1433 1478 1411 1414 1392 2305 2592 1997 2007 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Hours NOTE: 2006 for Denmark and the Republic of Korea. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 14 Labor Market Indicators
2.10 Unemployment rates, 2007 Most of the European countries had higher unemployment rates than the. Norway, the Netherlands, and the Republic of Korea had the lowest unemployment rates. Norway 2.6 Netherlands Korea, Rep. of 3.2 3.2 New Zealand Mexico Denmark Japan 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.9 Austria Australia Ireland 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.6 Canada United Kingdom 5.3 5.4 Sweden Italy 6.1 6.2 Portugal Spain France Germany 8.1 8.3 8.6 8.7 0 2 4 6 8 10 Percent SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Labor Market Indicators 15
2.11 Unemployment rates for youths, 2007 Unemployment rates for teenagers were higher than those for persons ages 20 to 24 in all countries. Italian teenagers had the highest unemployment rate, followed by their counterparts in Sweden, Spain, and France. Mexico 6.4 7.2 Netherlands 3.9 8.7 Japan 7.6 8.9 Ages 20-24 Ages 15-19 Korea, Rep. of 8.8 9.1 Denmark 5.4 9.4 Austria 7.2 11.2 Norway 5.2 12.1 Germany 11.5 12.9 Canada 8.0 13.6 Australia Ireland New Zealand 6.3 6.2 7.2 13.7 13.7 13.9 8.2 15.7 EU-15 13.0 19.3 United Kingdom 10.4 21.2 Portugal 14.8 24.1 France 18.2 27.3 Spain Sweden 13.8 15.1 28.7 29.7 Italy 18.2 31.7 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Percent NOTE: Persons ages 16 to 19 instead of ages 15 to 19 for Canada, France, Norway, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the. SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 16 Labor Market Indicators
2.12 Unemployment rates for youths and adults, 2007 In most countries, unemployment rates were two to three times higher for youths than for adults. The largest gaps between unemployment rates for youths and adults were in Italy and Sweden; the gap was smallest in the Netherlands. Netherlands 2.7 6.0 Mexico 2.5 6.7 Denmark 3.0 7.2 Ages 25+ Ages 15-24 Norway 1.7 7.5 Japan 3.5 7.8 Ireland 3.8 8.7 Austria 3.7 8.7 Korea, Rep. of 2.8 8.8 Australia 3.2 9.3 New Zealand 2.2 9.7 Canada 4.3 10.1 3.6 10.5 Germany 8.3 11.9 United Kingdom 3.7 14.4 EU-15 6.0 14.9 Portugal 7.1 16.6 Spain 7.0 18.2 Sweden 4.3 19.1 France 7.3 20.2 Italy 5.0 20.6 0 5 10 15 20 25 Percent NOTE: Persons ages 16 to 24 instead of ages 15 to 24 for Canada, France, Norway, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the. SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Labor Market Indicators 17
2.13 Persons unemployed one year or longer as a percent of total unemployment, 2007 Long-duration unemployment was least prevalent in the Republic of Korea and Mexico. The EU-15 countries combined had a relatively high percentage of persons unemployed one year or longer. More than half of the unemployed were without work for at least one year in Germany. Korea, Rep. of Mexico New Zealand Canada Norway Sweden Australia Denmark 0.6 2.7 5.7 7.5 8.8 10.0 13.0 15.5 18.2 United Kingdom Austria Spain Ireland Japan 24.7 26.8 27.6 30.3 32.0 France Netherlands EU-15 40.4 41.7 42.0 Portugal Italy 47.3 49.9 Germany 56.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percent SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 18 Labor Market Indicators
2.14 Ratios of unemployment rates of persons without high school degrees to those of persons with college or university degrees, 2006 Unemployment rates of persons without high school degrees were higher than those of persons with college or university degrees, except for men and women in Mexico and for women in the Republic of Korea. The ratios of unemployment rates for the two education levels were highest for men in Germany and Austria and for women in the. Mexico 0.7 0.8 Korea, Rep. of New Zealand Portugal 0.7 1.4 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.4 Women Men Japan 1.6 1.8 Italy 1.4 1.7 Denmark 1.8 1.7 Austria 1.8 4.1 Spain 1.5 2.1 France 1.8 2.1 Sweden 1.6 2.2 Australia 2.2 3.0 United Kingdom 2.3 2.8 Netherlands 1.7 2.5 Canada 2.6 2.4 Norway 2.3 2.9 Ireland 2.6 3.3 Germany 3.6 4.9 2.9 4.3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ratio NOTE: The ratio for Japan compares the unemployment rate of persons with high school degrees to that of persons with college or university degrees. The unemployment rates used to calculate these ratios are for men and women ages 25 to 64. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Labor Market Indicators 19
2.15 Educational attainment of the adult population, 2006 by highest level completed More than one-third of the adult population has attained a college or university degree in Canada, Japan, the, New Zealand, and Denmark. In Mexico and Portugal, more than 70 percent of the adult population has completed less than high school education. Less than high school High school or trade school College or university Canada 14 39 47 Japan 60 40 12 49 39 New Zealand 22 40 38 Denmark 17 48 35 Norway 21 46 33 Korea, Rep. of 23 44 33 Australia 33 34 33 Sweden 16 53 31 United Kingdom 14 56 30 Netherlands 28 42 30 Ireland 34 36 30 Spain 50 22 28 France 33 41 26 Germany 17 59 24 Austria 18 64 18 Mexico 78 7 15 Italy 48 39 13 Portugal 72 15 13 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent NOTE: For Japan, persons who have completed less than high school are combined with persons who have completed high school or trade school. The adult population is defined as persons ages 25 to 64. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 20 Labor Market Indicators
SECTION 3 Relative levels and changes in manufacturing hourly compensation costs and relative changes in manufacturing labor productivity (output per hour) and unit labor costs are useful for partially assessing international competitiveness. The data presented in this section are for the manufacturing sector only. Competitiveness Indicators for Manufacturing Charts 3.1 and 3.2 compare the level and trends of hourly compensation costs for production workers in manufacturing. Chart 3.3 depicts employer social insurance expenditures and other labor taxes as a percent of hourly compensation costs. Charts 3.4-3.7 provide comparisons of manufacturing productivity growth rates, the composition of productivity growth in terms of changes in output and hours worked, trends in unit labor costs, and shares of world manufacturing output. This section covers 16 to 22 economies, the most extensive coverage in this chartbook. In addition, a weighted aggregate for 15 European Union countries (EU-15) is shown on one chart. Competitiveness Indicators for Manufacturing 21
3.1 Hourly compensation costs, 2006 for production workers in manufacturing in U.S. dollars Ten of the 12 European countries, as well as Australia and Canada, had higher hourly compensation costs than the. Hourly compensation costs were under $10 in Mexico, Hong Kong SAR, Taiwan, Portugal, and Singapore. Norway 41.05 Denmark Germany Netherlands Sweden Austria 35.45 34.21 32.34 31.80 30.46 United Kingdom Australia Ireland Canada Italy France 27.10 26.14 25.96 25.74 25.07 24.90 23.82 Japan Spain 20.20 18.83 Korea, Rep. of New Zealand 14.72 14.47 Singapore Portugal Taiwan Hong Kong SAR 8.55 7.65 6.43 5.78 Mexico 2.75 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 U.S. dollars NOTE: Hong Kong SAR stands for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China. SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics. 22 Competitiveness Indicators for Manufacturing
3.2 Average annual growth rates for hourly compensation costs, 1996-2006 for production workers in manufacturing in U.S. dollars Growth in hourly compensation costs in U.S. dollars was greatest for the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the Republic of Korea. Only Japan had a decrease in hourly compensation costs over the period. United Kingdom 6.7 Ireland Korea, Rep. of 6.0 6.0 Mexico 5.4 Norway 4.9 Australia Canada 4.2 4.4 Portugal Spain Denmark Netherlands Italy France Sweden New Zealand 3.7 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.5 Austria 2.1 Germany Hong Kong SAR 1.2 1.5 Taiwan Singapore 0.4 0.7 Japan -0.1-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Percent NOTE: Hong Kong SAR stands for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China. SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Competitiveness Indicators for Manufacturing 23
3.3 Employer social insurance expenditures and other labor taxes as a percent of hourly compensation costs, 2006 for production workers in manufacturing Employer social insurance costs as a percent of hourly compensation costs were higher in the than in all of the non-european economies. In Europe, social insurance costs as a percent of total hourly compensation costs ranged widely, from 10.4 percent (Denmark) to 33.1 percent (Sweden). Sweden France Italy 30.4 32.0 33.1 Austria Spain 25.6 27.0 Germany Netherlands United Kingdom Australia Norway Canada Portugal 23.0 22.4 21.9 21.3 20.1 20.0 19.7 19.6 Japan Korea, Rep. of Ireland 17.0 16.9 17.8 Singapore Taiwan 13.4 12.6 Mexico Denmark 10.8 10.4 Hong Kong SAR 8.5 New Zealand 4.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Percent NOTE: Hong Kong SAR stands for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China. SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics. 24 Competitiveness Indicators for Manufacturing
3.4 Average annual growth rates for manufacturing productivity, 1997-2007 The Republic of Korea had the largest increase in manufacturing labor productivity, followed by Sweden, Taiwan, and the. Growth in manufacturing labor productivity was lowest in Italy. Korea, Rep. of 8.5 Sweden 6.4 Taiwan 6.1 5.5 United Kingdom 4.1 France 4.1 Germany 3.9 Netherlands 3.7 Singapore 3.6 Japan 3.5 Australia 2.6 Norway 2.5 Canada 2.4 Denmark 2.3 Spain 1.9 Italy 0.3 0 2 4 6 8 10 Percent NOTE: Productivity is defined as output per hour worked. SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Competitiveness Indicators for Manufacturing 25
3.5 Average annual growth rates for manufacturing output and hours worked, 1997-2007 Average annual growth rates for manufacturing output were highest in the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Sweden, and Taiwan. The United Kingdom, the, France, and Japan had the largest percentage declines in hours worked; by contrast, hours worked increased only in Singapore and Spain. Korea, Rep. of -0.7 7.7 Singapore 2.8 6.5 Sweden Taiwan -0.6-0.3 5.8 5.8-2.4 3.0 Germany -1.0 2.9 Spain 0.7 2.7 Netherlands Canada France Norway Japan Australia Denmark -1.3-0.3-2.0-0.6-1.9-1.1-1.4 2.4 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.5 1.5 0.9 United Kingdom -3.5 0.5 Hours worked Output Italy 0.0 0.3-6 -4-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 Percent SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics. 26 Competitiveness Indicators for Manufacturing
3.6 Average annual growth rates for manufacturing unit labor costs in U.S. dollars, 1997-2007 Unit labor costs (ULC) are a component of total production costs and product prices. Declines in ULC indicate that an economy is becoming more cost-competitive. ULC declined over the period in more than one-third of the economies, including the. Taiwan -4.8 Singapore -3.7 Japan -2.9 Sweden -1.1 Korea, Rep. of -0.9-0.8 Germany 0.5 France 1.4 Netherlands 2.0 Spain 3.1 United Kingdom 3.2 Denmark 3.6 Canada 3.7 Australia 3.7 Italy 4.0 Norway 4.6-6 -4-2 0 2 4 6 Percent NOTE: Unit labor costs are defined as the cost of labor compensation per unit of output. SOURCE: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Competitiveness Indicators for Manufacturing 27
3.7 Manufacturing output as a percent of world manufacturing output, 2007 The is the world s leading producer of manufactured goods. The EU-15 countries combined share of world manufacturing output surpassed that of the. EU-15 25.8 19.8 Japan 10.0 Germany 7.3 Italy United Kingdom France Korea, Rep. of Canada Spain Mexico Australia Netherlands Sweden Austria Ireland Singapore Denmark Norway Portugal New Zealand Hong Kong SAR 3.7 3.7 3.2 2.6 2.4 2.3 1.6 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Percent NOTE: Hong Kong SAR stands for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China. SOURCE: United Nations. 28 Competitiveness Indicators for Manufacturing
SECTION 4 Charts 4.1-4.5 show indicators of broad labor market and population issues, some of these in the policy field. Charts 4.1-4.3 compare the following policy issues: public expenditures on labor market programs, the extent of labor and product market regulations, and the level of taxation on labor. Other Economic Indicators Chart 4.4 shows dependency ratios. The dependency ratio is an overall measure of the dependence of children and the elderly on people of working age. However, dependency ratios show the age composition of a population, not necessarily economic dependency. Some children and elderly people are part of the labor force and some working-age people are not. Chart 4.5 compares data on trade in goods as a percent of GDP. This indicator shows an economy s degree of openness. The number of countries covered in this section varies from 18 to 21. In addition, a weighted aggregate for 15 European Union countries (EU-15) is shown on one chart. Other Economic Indicators 29
4.1 Public expenditures on labor market programs as a percent of GDP, 2006 Expenditures on labor market programs were less than one percent of GDP in seven countries, including the. The highest relative expenditures were in Denmark, followed by Germany and the Netherlands. Denmark 4.5 Germany 3.0 Netherlands 2.7 Sweden France Spain Austria 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 Portugal 1.9 Ireland Italy 1.3 1.5 Norway Canada Australia New Zealand United Kingdom Japan 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 Korea, Rep. of 0.4 0.4 0 1 2 3 4 5 Percent NOTE: 2004 for Denmark. Fiscal year 2006-2007 for Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and the United States. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 30 Other Economic Indicators
4.2 Measures of regulation on labor and product markets, 2003 Regulations on labor market activity were least restrictive in the, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The United Kingdom, Australia, and the had the least restrictive product markets. Portugal, Mexico, Spain, and France had the most restrictive labor markets; restrictive product markets were most pronounced in Mexico and Italy. United Kingdom Canada New Zealand Ireland Australia Japan Denmark Korea, Rep. of Austria Netherlands Italy Germany Sweden Norway France Spain Mexico Portugal 0.7 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.5 0.9 1.8 1.3 1.8 1.1 2.0 1.5 2.2 1.4 2.3 1.4 2.4 1.9 2.5 1.4 2.6 1.2 2.6 1.5 2.9 1.7 3.1 1.6 3.2 2.2 3.5 1.6 Labor market Product market 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Scale 0-6 from least to most restrictive SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Other Economic Indicators 31
4.3 Shares of labor costs taken by tax and social security contributions, 2007 For the average single worker without children, the combined employer-employee tax burden varied widely, from 15.3 percent (Mexico) to 52.2 percent (Germany). The combined employer-employee tax burden was lower in the than in all European countries except Ireland. Mexico 15.3 Korea, Rep. of New Zealand Ireland 19.6 21.5 22.3 Australia Japan Canada United Kingdom 27.7 29.3 30.0 31.3 34.1 Portugal Norway Spain Denmark EU-15 Netherlands Sweden Italy Austria France Germany 37.4 37.5 38.9 41.3 42.5 44.0 45.4 45.9 48.5 49.2 52.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Percent NOTE: Data refer to single persons without children at the income of the average worker. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 32 Other Economic Indicators
4.4 Dependency ratios, 2006 and projections to 2025 In 2006, Mexico had the highest dependency ratio and Hong Kong SAR had the lowest. Only Mexico s dependency ratio is expected to decrease by 2025; Japan is expected to have the highest dependency ratio. Korea, Rep. of Mexico Hong Kong SAR Ireland Singapore Spain Portugal Austria Canada New Zealand Norway Italy United Kingdom Australia Germany Netherlands Denmark France Sweden Japan 0.37 0.39 0.38 0.47 0.57 0.47 0.49 0.47 0.51 0.54 0.46 0.55 0.48 0.55 0.47 0.56 0.44 0.57 0.50 0.57 0.49 0.58 0.52 0.59 0.51 0.59 0.51 0.59 0.48 0.59 0.50 0.60 0.48 0.60 0.52 0.60 0.53 0.62 0.53 0.64 0.52 0.68 2006 2025 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 Ratio NOTE: Hong Kong SAR stands for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China. The dependency ratio is the ratio of dependents (persons ages 14 and under and persons ages 65 and over) to the working-age population (persons ages 15 to 64). SOURCES: World Bank and United Nations. Other Economic Indicators 33
4.5 Trade in goods as a percent of GDP, 2007 This indicator shows the relative importance of trade in goods to an economy. The and Japan had the lowest proportions of trade in goods to GDP. The relatively high figures for Singapore and the Netherlands reflect these countries status as platforms for re-exports and trans-shipments. Singapore 349 Netherlands 138 Austria Ireland Korea, Rep. of Germany Sweden Denmark Mexico Canada Portugal Norway Italy France New Zealand Spain United Kingdom Australia Japan 86 80 75 72 72 66 64 61 58 58 47 45 45 43 39 37 30 23 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Percent NOTE: Trade in goods is defined as the sum of merchandise exports and imports. SOURCE: World Bank. 34 Other Economic Indicators
SECTION 5 Charts 5.1-5.9 provide a broad overview of basic economic indicators for the and six large emerging economies. These emerging economies are not included in the other charts in this chartbook due to data limitations. Indicators for Large Emerging Economies Charts 5.1-5.3 show population data in three varying ways: world population distribution, age composition of the population, and dependency ratios. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) comparisons are shown in chart 5.4 (GDP per capita) and chart 5.5 (GDP per employed person). Chart 5.6 presents labor force participation rates by age, and chart 5.7 highlights employment-topopulation ratios by sex. Chart 5.8 compares trade in goods as a percent of GDP. Chart 5.9 shows manufacturing output as a percent of world manufacturing output. All of these charts include the United States, which is used as a reference point, and six large emerging economies: Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, the Russian Federation, and South Africa. In addition, a weighted aggregate for the rest of the world is shown on two charts. Indicators for Large Emerging Economies 35
5.1 World population distribution, 2007 The large emerging economies Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, the Russian Federation, and South Africa made up 46 percent of the world s population. China and India together made up well over one-third of the world s population. China 20% Rest of the World 49% India 17% 5% South Africa 1% Russian Federation 2% Brazil 3% Indonesia 3% SOURCE: World Bank. 36 Indicators for Large Emerging Economies
5.2 Age composition of the population, 2006 The Russian Federation had the lowest proportion of persons ages 14 and under and the highest proportion ages 65 and over. India had the largest proportion of persons ages 14 and under, accounting for almost onethird of the country s total population. Ages 14 and under Ages 15-64 Ages 65+ Russian Federation 14.9 71.4 13.7 20.7 67.0 12.3 China 21.1 71.1 7.8 Brazil 27.6 66.1 6.3 Indonesia 28.0 66.4 5.6 South Africa 31.9 63.7 4.4 India 32.5 62.5 5.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent SOURCE: World Bank. Indicators for Large Emerging Economies 37
5.3 Dependency ratios, 2006 and projections to 2025 India had the highest dependency ratio in 2006; however, between 2006 and 2025, India s ratio is expected to experience the largest decline. It is expected that by 2025, the dependency ratio will be highest in the and lowest in Indonesia, although these two countries had similar dependency ratios in 2006. Indonesia 0.43 0.51 2006 China 0.41 0.46 2025 Russian Federation 0.40 0.48 India 0.48 0.60 Brazil 0.49 0.51 South Africa 0.53 0.57 0.49 0.58 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Ratio NOTE: The dependency ratio is the ratio of dependents (persons ages 14 and under and persons ages 65 and over) to the working-age population (persons ages 15 to 64). SOURCES: World Bank and United Nations. 38 Indicators for Large Emerging Economies
5.4 GDP per capita, 2007 converted at PPP rates Among the large emerging economies, the Russian Federation, South Africa, and Brazil had the highest GDP per capita, about one-third to one-fifth of the U.S. level; India and Indonesia had the lowest, at less than one-tenth of the U.S. level. China was in the middle of the group, with a GDP per capita at nearly 12 percent of the U.S. level. 45.8 Russian Federation 14.7 South Africa 9.7 Brazil 9.6 China 5.3 Indonesia 3.7 India 2.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 Thousands of U.S. dollars NOTE: Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is the number of foreign currency units required to buy goods and services in a foreign country equivalent to what can be bought with one dollar in the. SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and World Bank. Indicators for Large Emerging Economies 39
5.5 GDP per employed person, 1995 and 2005 in 1990 U.S. dollars converted at PPP rates Among the large emerging economies, GDP per employed person was highest in the Russian Federation and Brazil. China had the largest percentage increase in GDP per employed person from 1995 to 2005, with an average annual growth rate of 6.9 percent. 51.5 63.0 Russian Federation 10.8 15.6 Brazil 14.1 14.7 South Africa 9.3 10.9 China 5.1 9.9 Indonesia India 8.2 9.5 4.2 6.5 1995 2005 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Thousands of 1990 U.S. dollars NOTE: Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is the number of foreign currency units required to buy goods and services in a foreign country equivalent to what can be bought with one dollar in the. SOURCE: International Labor Office. 40 Indicators for Large Emerging Economies
5.6 Labor force participation rates by age, 2007 Youths and persons ages 55 to 64 participated in the labor force to a much lesser extent in South Africa than in the other countries. China had the highest rate of labor force participation for prime-age persons (ages 25 to 54), at about 93 percent. Persons ages 65 and over had a particularly high rate of labor force participation in Indonesia. Ages 15-24 Ages 25-54 Brazil 63.8 China 93.1 China 59.6 Russian Federation 88.2 59.4 83.0 Indonesia 55.3 Brazil 82.3 India 44.5 Indonesia 76.7 Russian Federation 39.1 South Africa 72.9 South Africa 27.6 India 70.1 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent Percent Ages 55-64 Ages 65+ Indonesia 69.8 Indonesia 39.6 63.8 India 29.2 China 60.2 Brazil 24.3 India 56.9 South Africa 21.1 Brazil 56.8 China 20.1 Russian Federation 55.0 16.0 South Africa 39.5 Russian Federation 10.4 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent NOTE: Persons ages 16 to 24 instead of ages 15 to 24 for the. SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and International Labor Office. Indicators for Large Emerging Economies 41
5.7 Employment as a percent of the working-age population by sex, 2006 China had the highest percentages of employed working-age men and working-age women. Less than one-third of the female working-age population was employed in South Africa and India. China 66.8 78.9 56.6 70.1 Russian Federation 50.8 62.9 Women Men Brazil 49.8 73.0 Indonesia 44.3 77.5 India 32.2 77.7 South Africa 31.4 60.3 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent NOTE: The working-age population is defined as persons ages 15 and over for all countries except the, where it is defined as persons ages 16 and over. SOURCES: Bureau of Labor Statistics and International Labor Office. 42 Indicators for Large Emerging Economies
5.8 Trade in goods as a percent of GDP, 2007 This indicator shows the relative importance of trade in goods to an economy. China had the highest proportion of trade in goods to GDP, followed by South Africa and Indonesia; Brazil and the had the lowest proportions. China 66.3 South Africa 57.9 Indonesia 48.5 Russian Federation 44.8 India 30.9 23.0 Brazil 21.9 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Percent NOTE: Trade in goods is defined as the sum of merchandise exports and imports. SOURCE: World Bank. Indicators for Large Emerging Economies 43
5.9 Manufacturing output as a percent of world manufacturing output, 2007 The U.S. share of world manufacturing output was nearly equal to the combined share of the large emerging economies. Among the large emerging economies, China had the largest share of world manufacturing output. 20% China 12% Rest of the World 58% Russian Federation 4% South Africa 1% Indonesia 1% India 2% Brazil 2% NOTE: Including mining, quarrying, and public utilities for the Russian Federation. SOURCE: United Nations. 44 Indicators for Large Emerging Economies
SECTION 6 This section presents a visual abstract of the 2008 Employment Outlook published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The Employment Outlook is an annual publication that explores recent labor market developments of interest to the 30 OECD member countries. Employment Outlook Indicators Through their participation in the OECD Working Party on Employment, the U.S. Department of Labor and labor ministries from the other member countries advise OECD staff during the preparation of the Employment Outlook. Each chart in this section illustrates a different chapter of the Employment Outlook and provides a brief summary of that chapter in the second bullet. Chart 6.1 highlights the incidence of part-time employment for youths. Chart 6.2 shows the gender employment gap. Chart 6.3 compares the rate of psychological distress of low-skilled workers to that of all employed persons. Lastly, chart 6.4 presents foreign direct investment (FDI) trends. The Employment Outlook also includes a chapter on informal employment; however, this chapter is not charted because of difficulties associated with measuring informal employment. The number of countries covered in this section varies from 8 to 19. In addition, weighted aggregates for the 30 OECD member countries and the rest of the world are shown on one chart. Countries and years charted in this section conform to coverage in Sections 1-4 of this chartbook; for some indicators, additional coverage is available in the Employment Outlook chapters. Readers interested in exploring the Employment Outlook further may visit http://www.oecd.org/els/employment/outlook. Employment Outlook Indicators 45
6.1 Part-time employment for youths as a percent of total employment for youths, 1996 and 2006 The incidence of part-time employment among young workers increased in most countries. The OECD chapter examines recent labor market performance of young workers, the sensitivity of youth employment to business cycles, the prevalence of part-time and temporary work arrangements among young workers, the relationship between youth employment and schooling decisions, and employment challenges facing some school leavers. Netherlands 46.8 59.9 Denmark 41.7 55.1 Norway 40.4 48.8 Canada 45.7 44.1 Australia 38.9 43.1 Sweden 36.2 36.2 New Zealand 32.5 36.0 United Kingdom 28.3 34.9 35.0 33.8 Japan 22.6 31.1 Ireland 13.8 23.1 Spain 12.6 19.6 Germany 7.4 18.0 Mexico 16.1 17.6 France 19.8 17.1 Italy 7.9 14.9 1996 Korea, Rep. of Austria 5.5 5.3 14.9 11.8 2006 Portugal 5.7 7.1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Percent NOTE: Youths are defined as persons ages 15 to 24. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 46 Employment Outlook Indicators
6.2 Employment as a percent of the prime-age population by sex, 2007 In all countries, prime-age women had lower employment rates than men. The OECD chapter discusses how the gender employment gap may be traced to educational attainment, the timing of marriage and children, the gender wage gap, and discriminatory labor practices. Women Men Sweden Norway Denmark 83.0 82.3 81.8 89.0 89.2 90.2 Canada Austria Netherlands France Portugal United Kingdom New Zealand Germany Australia Ireland Japan Spain 78.2 77.5 77.4 76.4 74.9 74.7 74.6 73.6 72.5 71.9 69.5 67.4 65.6 86.2 90.6 89.6 88.1 87.2 88.3 90.3 86.7 87.5 88.1 87.9 92.8 87.6 Korea, Rep. of Italy 60.5 59.6 87.3 87.3 Mexico 51.0 92.9 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent NOTE: The prime-age population is defined as persons ages 25 to 54. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Employment Outlook Indicators 47
6.3 Ratios of psychological distress rates of workers in lowskilled occupations to those of all employed persons In all countries, except Italy, workers in occupations that require low skill and consist of simple and routine tasks experienced higher rates of psychological distress than did the total employed population. In the, the psychological distress rate of workers in low-skilled occupations was 80 percent higher than that of the total employed population. The OECD chapter explores patterns of work-related mental health problems and their relationship with new work patterns. (2003) 1.80 Korea, Rep. of (2005) 1.70 New Zealand (2003) 1.44 United Kingdom (2004) 1.22 Australia (2004-05) 1.15 Sweden (2001) 1.10 France (2003) 1.05 Italy (2005) 1.00 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 Ratio SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 48 Employment Outlook Indicators
6.4 Shares of global foreign direct investment expenditures and receipts, 1995, 2000, and 2005 Global foreign direct investment (FDI) increased dramatically over the period. While the vast majority of FDI activities occurred among OECD countries, the non-oecd countries experienced increasing shares of both FDI expenditures and receipts. The OECD chapter considers how wages and working conditions within countries are affected by FDI receipts. OECD Countries Rest of the World FDI Expenditures 1995 2.4 0.3 2000 5.3 0.9 2005 6.9 1.4 FDI Receipts 1995 1.9 0.6 2000 4.1 1.7 2005 5.3 2.5 0 2 4 6 8 10 Trillions of U.S. dollars NOTE: In principle, global FDI expenditures should equal receipts; however, due to gaps in coverage and the use of different reporting systems across countries, measured levels of expenditures and receipts often differ. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Employment Outlook Indicators 49
APPENDIX This chartbook is based partially upon the output of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) program of international comparisons of labor force, compensation, and productivity. In order to increase country and indicator coverage, BLS data are supplemented by data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and other organizations. Definitions, Sources, and Methods BLS adjusts foreign statistics to a common conceptual framework, thereby aiding users in making meaningful international comparisons. Comparability issues arise due to, for example, differences in definitions, time periods, and population coverage. Summary descriptions of the BLS comparative series are provided below. More detailed information can be found in the source documents listed, which are available on the BLS international labor comparisons Web site at http://www.bls.gov/ilc/. To increase country coverage for some of the GDP per capita and labor market indicators charts (sections 1 and 2), BLS data are supplemented by data mainly from OECD, but also from the International Labor Organization s International Labor Office (ILO), World Bank, and national sources. The data from these alternative sources are judged reasonably comparable with the BLS series unless otherwise noted. The charts on hourly compensation and productivity in manufacturing (charts 3.1-3.6) have not been supplemented by other sources; data are from the BLS series. To provide other indicators of interest, 26 of the charts (charts 2.4, 2.5, 2.8, 2.9, 2.13-2.15, 3.7, and all charts in sections 4, 5, and 6) are based on statistics compiled by other organizations, mainly OECD, but also the United Nations, World Bank, and ILO. Discussion of the data from the non-bls sources is included below. Although some adjustments may have been made by the source organizations to enhance comparability, these data generally are not considered fully comparable across countries. Where applicable, some caveats concerning comparability are noted. Country coverage varies by indicator. Coverage in sections 1, 2, and 4 varies from 18 to 21 countries. In addition, weighted aggregates for 15 European Union countries (EU-15) are shown on most charts. These Definitions, Sources, and Methods A1