Analysis of House and Senate Farm Bills: Implications for Arkansas Producers

Similar documents
2014 Farm Bill Overview

Presentation Outline

Archie Flanders University of Arkansas Northeast Research and Extension Center Keiser, AR. The Farm Bill Decision Making Process

Commodity Programs in 2014 Farm Bill. Key Provisions

Can U.S. Agriculture Survive in the World of Uncertainty? Flynn Adcock Texas A&M AgriLife Research

2014 Farm Bill Update. International Crop Expo February 19, 2015

FARM PROGRAM DECISION TOOL

Current Crop Insurance and Federal Policy Situation

Looking Out for the 2012 Farm Bill

Farm Bill Details and Decisions

Farm Safety Net Provisions in a 2013 Farm Bill: S. 954 and H.R. 2642

Seed Cotton Informational Meeting. Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)

Farm Policy: 2012 and Beyond

Agricultural Act of 2014

NGFA Country Elevator Conference St. Louis, Missouri Dec. 9, 2013

2002 FSRIA. Farm Security & Rural Investment Act. (2002 Farm Bill) How much money is spent with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)?

Farm Bill Details and Decisions for 2014

Farm Bill Details and Decisions

Farm Bill and Texas A&M Computer Training. Nebraska Innovation Campus Conference Center January 14, 2015

Farm Bill Details and Decisions

11/14/2011. Bradley D. Lubben, Ph.D. Special thanks to: Federal Budget. Economy Farm & General Economy. Politics. Super Committee (more politics)

Farm Safety Net. Dr. Alejandro Plastina Assistant Professor, Economics

Pat Westhoff FAPRI-MU, University of Missouri

2014 Actual Average County Yield. times. higher of: Month Market Year Average Price or National Loan Rate 86% times

2014 FARM BILL COMMODITY PROGRAMS AND DECISION TOOLS

AGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 19: ANALYSIS OF THE 2014 FARM BILL I

The Potential Budgetary Costs and WTO Implications of the New Farm Bill. Joseph Glauber and Pat Westhoff

Agricultural Risk Coverage County (ARC CO) vs. Price Loss Coverage (PLC)

Crop Insurance Challenges and Prospects for Southern Irrigated Farms: the case of Arkansas. and

The Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) Program of the 2014 Farm Bill

PROCRASTINATOR'S FARM BILL UPDATE. Paul Goeringer, Extension Legal Specialist, Women in Ag Wednesday Webinar March 11, 2015

Estimated ARC and PLC Payments for 2016 Covered Commodities

CRS Report for Congress

The 2014 U.S. Farm Bill: DDA Implications of Increased Countercyclical Support and Reliance on Insurance

2014 Farm Bill. Jay Yates Extension Program Specialist III Risk Management

2014 Farm Bill How does it affect you and your operation? Section 1: Overview, Base Reallocation, and Yield Updates

Farm Bill Meeting Stoddard County

Maryland Crop Insurance Workshop

PROGRAM DECISION STEPS FARM BILL TOOLBOX. Gary Schnitkey, Jonathan Coppess, Nick Paulson University of Illinois

Risk Management Agency

Analyzing Federal Farm Program and Crop Insurance Options to Assess Policy Design and Risk Management Implications for Crop Producers

The 2018 Farm Bill: Overview & Outlook

Todd D. Davis John D. Anderson Robert E. Young. Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association s

Risk Management Agency

Farm Bill Principles and Commodity Program Proposals: A View from the House

Farm Bill Meeting Scott County

2014 Farm Bill How does it affect you and your operation? Section II: PLC, SCO, ARC-C, and ARC-I

Allan Gray and Luc Valentin. Purdue University

Farm Bill Meeting Bollinger County

Farm Bill Meeting Cape County

The 2018 Farm Bill. Dr. Alejandro Plastina Assistant Professor, Economics

Indiana FSA Illiana Vegetable Growers Symposium. Schererville, IN January 6, 2015

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

2018 Farm Bill Comparison Cotton and Other Selected Provisions* Prepared by the National Cotton Council

Ohio Agriculture Risk Coverage and Price Loss Coverage Payments for Program Year 2016 Prepared by Ben Brown

Common Crop Insurance Policy & Area Risk Protection Insurance 1

Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA); Market Facilitation Program (MFP) AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation and Farm Service Agency, USDA.

ARC vs. PLC Enrollment Decisions

Should Basic Underwriting Rules be Applied to Average Crop Revenue Election and Supplemental Revenue?

FARM BILL UPDATE WHAT CAN WISCONSIN EXPECT?

NAAFP Farm Bill Decision Aid Insurance Tool

AFPC Crop Decision Aids Data Collection Form and Instructions

A VEIW FROM THE SOUTH

How Will the Farm Bill s Supplemental Revenue Programs Affect Crop Insurance?

Ohio Agriculture Risk Coverage and Price Loss Coverage Payments for Program Year 2016 Prepared by Ben Brown and Chris Bruynis

Farm Level Impacts of a Revenue Based Policy in the 2007 Farm Bill

Title: The Economic Welfare Impacts of the new Agricultural Insurance and Shallow Loss Programs

Farm Bill 2014 Agricultural Act of What You Need To Know Doug Yoder, IFB

PLC OR ARC? FARM BILL PROGRAM SIGN-UP AND DECISION AIDS

The 2014 Farm Bill. Program Selection Mitchell County. Neil Cates Livestock Extension Agent Post Rock Extension District #1

The 2014 Farm Bill. Program Selection. JEWELL County. Sandra L. Wick K-State Research and Extension Post Rock District Crop Production Agent

The Agricultural Act of 2014: Update on STAX, SCO & Farm Bill Implementation. Mid-South Region December 2014

The Economics of ARC vs. PLC

Estimated Payments Under the 2014 County Agricultural Risk Coverage Program in Maryland

Crop Insurance for Milk? Dairy-Revenue Protection

The Agricultural Act of 2014: Update on STAX, SCO & Farm Bill Implementation. Southeast Region December 2014

Farm Safety Net Programs: Background and Issues

Harry de Gorter Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University

2008 FARM BILL: FOCUS ON ACRE

Economic Conditions & the Title 1 Programs

Common Crop Insurance Policy 2011 Crop Year

2015 COTTON MARKET OUTLOOK AND RISK MANAGEMENT DECISIONS

Background Information

AGEC 429: AGRICULTURAL POLICY LECTURE 18: ANALYSIS OF PAST FARM BILL PROGRAMS III

Effects of Supplemental Revenue Programs on Crop Insurance Coverage Levels * Harun Bulut and Keith J. Collins National Crop Insurance Services (NCIS)

Farm Bill Overview.

Counter-Cyclical Farm Safety Nets

Rice Stocks. Rough Rice Stocks United States. Million cwt

Keith Collins and Harun Bulut, NCIS

AGECON-18-09PR October 30, Implications of Hurricane Michael on the Seed Cotton ARC/PLC Selection Decision

Counter-Cyclical Agricultural Program Payments: Is It Time to Look at Revenue?

Grain Warehouse Operator s Guide to USDA s Marketing Assistance Loan Program

2018 Farm Bill Outlook

Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) vs. Price Loss Coverage (PLC)

Working Party on Agricultural Policies and Markets

Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) vs. Price Loss Coverage (PLC)

Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) vs. Price Loss Coverage (PLC)

Farm Safety Net Programs: Issues for the Next Farm Bill

Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) vs. Price Loss Coverage (PLC)

RISK MANAGEMENT AND THE NEW 2014 FARM BILL

Transcription:

Analysis of House and Senate Farm Bills: Implications for Arkansas Producers Eric Wailes, Eddie Chavez and K. Bradley Watkins University of Arkansas August 2, 2013 Arkansas Rice Expo

Projected Changes in Program Spending by Title for the 2013 Farm Bill FY 2014-2018 4 2 0-2? -4-6 Senate House -8-10 Source: CBO Estimates, May17,2013 for S.954; July11,2013 for H.R.2642 against May,2013 Baseline

Projected Changes in Program Spending by Title for the 2013 Farm Bill FY 2014-2023 15 10 5 0-5 -10-15 -20-25? Senate House Source: CBO Estimates, May17,2013 for S.954; July11,2013 for H.R.2642 against May,2013 Baseline

Comparison: Senate and House FB Versions Senate-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (S. 954, June 10, 2013) House-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (H.R. 2642, July 11, 2013) A. Price-Based Payments A. Price-Based Payments 1. Adverse Market Payments (AMP) 1. Price Loss Coverage (PLC) a. Payment Rate The difference between the reference price and the 12-month national average market price (or loan rate, if higher) a. Payment Rate The difference between reference price and national midseason market price (or loan rate, if higher) b. Covered Commodities Same as CCP's (except upland cotton which is eligible for STAX) b. Covered Commodities Same as CCP's (except upland cotton which is eligible for STAX)

Comparison: Senate and House FB Versions Senate-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (S. 954, June 10, 2013) b. Reference Prices Long grain rice, cwt: $ 13.30 Medium grain rice, cwt: $13.30 Peanuts, ton: $523.77 All other covered commodities: 55% of the Olympic average national marketing year price for the most recent 5 crop years House-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (H.R. 2642, July 11, 2013) b. Reference Prices Long grain rice, cwt: $14.00 Medium grain rice, cwt: $14.00 + 15% japonicas Wheat, bu: $5.50 Corn, bu: $3.70 Grain sorghum, bu: $3.95 Barley, bu: $4.95 Oats, bu: $2.40 Soybeans, bu: $8.40 Other oilseeds, cwt: $20.15 Dry peas, cwt: $11.00 Lentils, cwt: $19.97 Small chickpeas, cwt: $19.04 Large chickpeas, cwt: $21.54 Peanuts, ton: $535.00

Comparison: Senate and House FB Versions Senate-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (S. 954, June 10, 2013) d. Payment amount Payment rate*85% of base acres planted to crop * existing CCP program yield (for rice and peanuts, yields may be updated with 2009-2012 data; base acres for peanuts may be updated using 2009-2012 plantings). House-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (H.R. 2642, July 11, 2013) d. Payment amount Payment rate*85% of total acres planted to crop (and 30% of "prevented plantings")*existing CCP program yield (or 90% of 2008-2012 average yield per planted acre). Payment acres cannot exceed farm base acres. e. Payment Limit $50,000 per person or legal entity e. Payment Limit $125,000 per person or legal entity

Comparison: Senate and House FB Versions Senate-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (S. 954, June 10, 2013) House-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (H.R. 2642, July 11, 2013) B. Revenue-Based Payments B. Revenue-Based Payments 1. Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) 1. Revenue Loss Coverage (RLC) a. Description Payment is made in addition to AMP. Producers make a one-time, irrevocable selection of either farm or county option--applicable to all acres under the operational control of the producers. b. Covered Commodities Same as AMP c. Payment Trigger Shallow Loss Payments are made on planted (or prevented planting) acres when actual crop revenue (actual yield*higher of national farm price or reference price) drops below 88% of the benchmark revenue. a. Description An alternative to PLC. Producers make a one-time, irrevocable election on a commodity-bycommodity and farm-by-farm basis to receive RLC payment instead of PLC. Similar to ARC but provides only a county revenue guarantee. b. Covered Commodities Same as PLC c. Payment Trigger Shallow Loss Payments are made on planted (or prevented planting) acres when actual crop revenue (actual yield*higher of national farm price or PLC reference price) drops below 85% of the benchmark revenue.

Comparison: Senate and House FB Versions Senate-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (S. 954, June 10, 2013) d. Payment Rate Per acre payment rate = the difference between per acre guarantee (88%*benchmark revenue) and actual revenue; with maximum payment rate of 10% of benchmark revenue per acre. (1) Benchmark Revenue-Farm level: 5-year farm yield*5-year Olympic average national price. Payment=difference between the per-acre guarantee and actual per-acre revenue*65% of eligible planted acres (and 45% of prevented plantings) (2) Benchmark Revenue-County level: 5-year county yield*5-year Olympic average national price. Payment=difference between the per-acre guarantee and actual per-acre revenue*80% of eligible planted acres (and 45% of prevented plantings) House-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (H.R. 2642, July 11, 2013) d. Payment Rate Payment is made on 85% of planted acres and 30% of prevented planting acres. For all crops, maximum payment rate of 10% of benchmark revenue per acre. No farm option County Benchmark Revenue: Most recent 5- year Olympic average county yield*most recent 5-year Olympic average national marketing year price.

Comparison: Senate and House FB Versions Senate-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (S. 954, June 10, 2013) e. Payment Limit: $50,000 per person or legal entity f. Adjusted Gross Income Limit: eliminates farm and non-farm AGI limits, prohibits farm commodity program payments if total AGI is greater than $750,000 g. Others (1) Separate guarantees for irrigated and nonirrigated crops (2) Eligible program acres cannot exceed average total acres planted to covered commodities plus cotton during 2009-2012. House-Passed 2013 Farm Bill (H.R. 2642, July 11, 2013) e. Payment Limit: $125,000 per person or legal entity f. Adjusted Gross Income Limit: eliminates farm and non-farm AGI limits, prohibits farm commodity program payments if total AGI is greater than $950,000 g. Others (1) Separate guarantees for irrigated and nonirrigated crops (2) Payment acres are capped at total farm base acres.

Arkansas Representative Panel Farms Basis to assess alternative commodity payments Name ARHR3240 ARWR1400 ARHR3000 ARC7500 Location Stuttgart Wynne Hoxie McGehee County Arkansas Cross Lawrence Desha Acres - Owned 648 420 1,000 1,200 Acres - Crop Share Lease 1,552 490 1,500 5,985 Acres - Cash Lease 1,040 490 500 315 Total Acres 3,240 1,400 3,000 7,500 Rice 1,620 700 1,450 1,875 Long-Grain 1,620 700 1,300 1,875 Medium-Grain 0 0 150 0 Soybeans 1,296 700 1,250 1,625 Cotton 0 0 0 1,500 Corn 0 0 300 1,500 Wheat 324 0 0 1,000

Summary of Probabilities of Receiving Payments and Weighted Annual Probable Payments per Acre by Program by Crop, Stuttgart Farm, averages for 2014-2018*. Rep Farm Stuttgart Program/Crop LG Rice Irr Soy Wheat PLC 78% $ 75 5% $ 1 14% $ 9 RLC 9% $ 4 11% $ 5 14% $ 4 AMP 63% $ 51 0% $0 0% $0 ARC-County 7% $ 2 17% $ 7 16% $ 4 ARC-Farm 11% $ 2 20% $ 6 19% $ 4 2 House bill options (PLC & RLC) and 3 Senate bill options (AMP, ARC-C and ARC-F) are analyzed. For each crop, the % probability of a payment > 0 is given with the expected average payment per acre for each program. For example, the Stuttgart farm has an average probability over the 2014-18 period of receiving a PLC payment 78% of the time. 22% of the time there will be no payment as price > $14, the PLC reference price. See next slide for example of the annual estimates for LG Rice under the PLC program.

Example: PLC 5-year simulation* for Stuttgart farm Long grain rice Payments/Planted Acre: Stuttgart Variable 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Mean $61.34 $68.14 $76.16 $83.19 $83.22 StDev $58.34 $60.47 $62.40 $64.05 $64.05 CV 95.10 88.74 81.94 76.99 76.97 Min $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Max $198.40 $206.24 $214.85 $222.23 $222.26 Payment Prob>0 71% 77% 80% 81% 81% Annual simulation results for 2014-2018 shows the average (mean), standard deviation (StDev), Coefficient of Variation (CV=StDev/Mean), minimum payment per acre (Min), and maximum payment per acre (Max), and probability that payment will be greater than zero $/acre. CDF (cumulative distribution function) shows in 2018 payment of zero has probability of 19% and payment > $0 is 81%, with maximum at very low probability of $222.26 per acre. * 500 simulations per year for yields and prices, using May 2013, CBO baseline prices.

Long Grain Rice: Summary of Probabilities of Receiving Payments and Weighted Annual Probable Payments per Acre by Program by Farm (2014-2018) Program/Farm Stuttgart Wynne Hoxie McGehee PLC 78% $ 75 78% $ 67 78% $ 65 78% $ 69 RLC 9% $ 4 7% $ 3 16% $ 5 6% $ 2 AMP 63% $ 51 63% $ 43 63% $ 37 63% $ 44 ARC-County 7% $ 2 5% $ 2 14% $ 4 5% $ 1 ARC-Farm 11% $ 2 13% $ 4 11% $ 3 15% $ 4

Irrigated Soybeans: Summary of Probabilities of Receiving Payments and Weighted Annual Probable Payments per Acre by Program by Farm (2014-2018) Program/Farm Stuttgart Wynne Hoxie McGehee PLC 5% $ 1 5% $ 1 5% $ 1 5% $ 1 RLC 11% $ 5 12% $ 4 12% $ 3 8% $ 4 AMP 0% $ - 0% $ - 0% $ - 0% $ - ARC-County 17% $ 7 19% $ 6 17% $ 5 12% $ 6 ARC-Farm 20% $ 6 20% $ 6 34% $ 6 22% $ 7

Non-irrigated Soybeans: Summary of Probabilities of Receiving Payments and Weighted Annual Probable Payments per Acre by Program by Farm (2014-2018) Program/Farm Wynne Hoxie PLC 5% $ - 5% $ 1 RLC 18% $ 5 43% $ 7 AMP 0% $ - 0% $ - ARC-County 22% $ 6 34% $ 2 ARC-Farm 43% $ 8 39% $ 10

Wheat: Summary of Probabilities of Receiving Payments and Weighted Annual Probable Payments per Acre by Program by Farm (2014-2018) Program/Farm Stuttgart McGehee PLC 14% $ 9 40% $ 8 RLC 14% $ 4 8% $ 2 AMP 0% $ - 0% $ - ARC-County 16% $ 4 9% $ 2 ARC-Farm 19% $ 4 23% $ 4

Corn: Summary of Probabilities of Receiving Payments and Weighted Annual Probable Payments per Acre by Program by Farm (2014-2018) Program/Farm Hoxie McGehee PLC 10% $ 3 0% $ - RLC 3% $ 2 5% $ 5 AMP 0% $ - 0% $ - ARC-County 4% $ 18 7% $ 6 ARC-Farm 23% $ 15 24% $ 11

Probability of Farms Hitting Payment Limits for Alternative Programs Farm/Program PLC RLC AMP+ARC-C AMP+ARC-F No.* Prob.** No. Prob. No. Prob. No. Prob. Stuttgart 45 9.1% 0 0.0% 127 25.4% 127 25.5% Wynne 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 23 4.6% 33 6.6% Hoxie 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 111 22.3% 120 23.9% McGehee 68 13.6% 0.4 0.1% 161 32.2% 208 41.6% Assumptions: Each farm has a total of two legal entities. H.R. 2642 payment limit is $125,000 per entity. PLC (Price loss coverage) and RLC (Revenue loss coverage) S. 954 payment limit is $50,000 per entity. AMP (Adverse Market Price) and ARC (Agriculture Risk Coverage) -C (county) and -F (farm) * Average of number of times per 500 iterations per year, 2014-2018 that payment limit is reached. ** Average probability of reaching the payment limit per year, 2014-2018.

This Research is funded by the Arkansas Rice Research and Promotion Board. It is greatly appreciated.