Assembly Bill No. 380 Assemblywoman Kirkpatrick

Similar documents
APPROVED REGULATION OF THE NEVADA TAX COMMISSION. LCB File No. R Effective September 27, 2018

Senate Bill No. 1 Committee of the Whole

Assembly Bill No. 455 Committee on Commerce and Labor

Referred to Committee on Education. SUMMARY Establishes the Nevada Educational Choice Scholarship Program. (BDR )

A Bill Regular Session, 2019 HOUSE BILL 1002

MARCH 11, Referred to Committee on Transportation. SUMMARY Enacts provisions governing tied body shops. (BDR )

- 79th Session (2017) EMERGENCY REQUEST of Senate Majority Leader. Senate Bill No. 555 Senators Ford and Roberson

Referred to Committee on Revenue and Economic Development. FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: May have Fiscal Impact. Effect on the State: Yes.

Senate Bill No. 1 Committee of the Whole

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 20, 2013) SECOND REPRINT S.B Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy

A Bill Regular Session, 2019 HOUSE BILL 1002

As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

Assembly Bill No. 183 Assemblyman Ohrenschall

Senate Bill No. 26 Committee on Government Affairs

REQUIRES TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY VOTE ( 16) (Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 19, 2011) FIRST REPRINT A.B. 299 MARCH 17, 2011

Assembly Bill No. 389 Assemblyman Paul Anderson

Assembly Bill No. 71 Committee on Taxation

REQUIRES TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY VOTE ( 16) MARCH 17, Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor

Referred to Committee on Transportation. SUMMARY Revises provisions concerning short-term leases of passenger cars. (BDR )

Assembly Bill No. 50 Committee on Judiciary

- 79th Session (2017) Senate Bill No. 41 Committee on Judiciary

Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy

Senate Bill No. 398 Senator Kieckhefer

Senate Bill No. 63 Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy

Senate Bill No. 146 Senator Spearman

2017 Session (79th) A SB Senate Amendment to Senate Bill No. 26 (BDR ) Title: Yes Preamble: No Joint Sponsorship: No Digest: Yes

Senate Bill No. 165 Senators Ford, Smith, Denis, Hutchison, Roberson; Atkinson, Jones, Kihuen, Manendo, Parks, Segerblom, Spearman and Woodhouse

Assembly Amendment to Assembly Bill No. 305 (BDR ) Proposed by: Assembly Committee on Health and Human Services

Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to collective bargaining by local government employers.

2009 SESSION (75th) A AB Assembly Amendment to Assembly Bill No. 177 (BDR ) Proposed by: Assembly Committee on Transportation

Referred to Committee on Transportation. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing certificates of title for vehicles. (BDR )

Senate Bill No. 448 Committee on Judiciary

Senate Bill No. 91 Senator Hardy

Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to insurance coverage of prescription drugs.

Assembly Bill No. 428 Committee on Commerce and Labor

MAY 12, Referred to Committee on Ways and Means

Assembly Bill No. 304 Assemblymen Bobzien; Benitez- Thompson, Hickey, Segerblom and Smith. Joint Sponsors: Senators Leslie; and Copening

MARCH 28, Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing insurance. (BDR )

Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to public retirement systems. (BDR )

Senate Bill No. 126 Senator Ford

REQUIRES TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY VOTE ( 5) MARCH 17, Referred to Committee on Government Affairs

REVISED PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES. LCB File No. R July 17, 2014

2017 Session (79th) A AB183 R Senate Amendment to Assembly Bill No. 183 First Reprint (BDR )

Senate Bill No. 437 Committee on Commerce and Labor

Assembly Bill No. 267 Assemblymen Araujo, Carlton, Frierson; Daly, Fumo, Jauregui, Monroe-Moreno and Spiegel

2017 Session (79th) A AB206 R Senate Amendment to Assembly Bill No. 206 Second Reprint (BDR )

MARCH 7, Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing industrial insurance.

Senate Bill No. 406 Senator Roberson

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE. LCB File No. R022-08

Senate Amendment to Senate Bill No. 126 (BDR 18-21) Proposed by: Senate Committee on Revenue and Economic Development

Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing service contracts. (BDR )

Senate Bill No. 81 Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy

Senate Bill No. 232 Senators Segerblom, Manendo, Cancela, Parks; and Woodhouse. Joint Sponsors: Assemblymen Neal; Araujo, Daly and Joiner

Assembly Amendment to Assembly Bill No. 196 (BDR ) Proposed by: Assembly Committee on Government Affairs

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Exempts certain offers or sales of securities from registration requirements for securities.

2017 Session (79th) A SB Senate Amendment to Senate Bill No. 90 (BDR 18-18) Title: Yes Preamble: No Joint Sponsorship: No Digest: Yes

Senate Bill No. 289 Senator Copening (by request)

Nevada s Oral Anticancer Treatment Access Law: What What Clinicians Need to Know

Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing public officers and employees. (BDR )

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on April 24, 2017) FIRST REPRINT A.B. 249 MARCH 1, Referred to Committee on Health and Human Services

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 1999 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 1624

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE. LCB File No. R028-18

NYE COUNTY AGENDA INFORMATION FORM. LI No financial impact

Referred to Committee on Commerce, Labor and Energy. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to policies of health insurance.

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION. LCB File No. R Effective April 30, 2004

Assembly Bill No. 425 Committee on Commerce and Labor

REVISED PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF MORTGAGE LENDING. LCB File No. R January 4, 2019

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

Senate Bill No. 415 Senators Cancela and Woodhouse. Joint Sponsors: Assemblywomen Jauregui, Monroe-Moreno and Spiegel

3. Public Hearing to receive comment and take possible action on the proposed adoption, amendment, and repeal of regulation (LCB File No.

MARCH 5, Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing workers compensation.

MARCH 3, Referred to Committee on Government Affairs. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing public works. (BDR )

Deleted: Formatted: Normal. Deleted: either, or both

Convention Center Expansion and Renovation Legislative Recommendation Preliminary Draft

Assembly Bill No. 5 Committee on Government Affairs

2016 Special Session (30th) A AB1 7. Assembly Amendment to Assembly Bill No. 1. Title: Yes Preamble: No Joint Sponsorship: No Digest: Yes

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 1527

Construction Materials Pulled From Inventory Not Subject to Sales Tax

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 22, 2007) SECOND REPRINT S.B. 310 MARCH 19, Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE TREASURER. LCB File No. R Effective October 29, 2003

Assembly Bill No. 12 Committee on Commerce and Labor

Senate Bill No. 382 Committee on Health and Education

Does the United States now have a VAT? and other frequently asked questions about South Dakota v. Wayfair, et al.

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE LCB FILE NO. R165-18I. The following document is the initial draft regulation proposed

Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor. SUMMARY Makes various changes relating to insurance adjusters. (BDR )

STATE & LOCAL TAX NEXUS: WHEN HAVE YOU CROSSED THE LINE?

Joint Sponsors: Senators Ford, Ratti and Cancela

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND DIVISION OF TAXATION. Business Corporation Tax Corporate Nexus. Regulation CT Table of Contents

Assembly Bill No. 83 Committee on Judiciary

Senate Amendment to Senate Bill No. 539 (BDR ) Title: Yes Preamble: No Joint Sponsorship: No Digest: Yes

HOUSE BILL No As Amended by House Committee

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE. LCB File No. R Effective September 18, 2006

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF MORTGAGE LENDING. LCB File No. R Effective January 27, 2017

ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE PUBLIC WORKS BOARD. LCB File No. R Effective October 15, 2010

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED MAY 15, 2014

EXPLANATION Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.

Quill. Is it still the law? October 25, Robert G. Tweel Phone

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

Nevada Division of Insurance 1818 E. College Parkway, Suite 103 Carson City, Nevada Nevada State Business Center

State & Local Tax Alert

Transcription:

Assembly Bill No. 380 Assemblywoman Kirkpatrick CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to taxation; enacting provisions relating to the imposition, collection and remittance of sales and use taxes by retailers located outside this State; and providing other matters properly relating thereto. Legislative Counsel s Digest: The Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution prohibits a state from requiring a retailer to collect sales and use taxes unless the activities of the retailer have a substantial nexus with the taxing state. (Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992)) Existing law requires every retailer whose activities create such a nexus with this State to impose, collect and remit the sales and use taxes imposed in this State. (NRS 372.724, 374.724) This bill provides that a retailer who engages in certain specified activities is required to collect and remit the sales and use taxes imposed in this State. Section 1 of this bill requires the Department of Taxation to submit a report to the Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau concerning each finding, ruling or agreement by the Department or the Nevada Tax Commission which provides that the provisions of existing law requiring a retailer to impose, collect and remit sales and use taxes do not apply to the retailer even though the retailer or an affiliate owns or operates a warehouse, distribution center, fulfillment center or other similar facility in this State. Sections 2 and 5 of this bill enact provisions based on a Colorado law which creates a presumption that a retailer is required to impose, collect and remit sales and use taxes if the retailer is: (1) part of a controlled group of business entities that has a component member who has physical presence in this State; and (2) the component member with such physical presence engages in certain activities in this State that relate to the ability of the retailer to make retail sales to residents of this State. (Ch. 364, Colo. Session Laws 2014, at p. 1740) Under sections 2 and 5, a retailer may rebut this presumption by providing proof that the component member with physical presence in this State did not engage in any activity in this State that was significantly associated with the retailer s ability to establish or maintain a market in this State for the retailer s products or services. Sections 3 and 6 of this bill enact a provision based on a New York law which creates a presumption that a retailer is required to impose, collect and remit sales and use taxes if: (1) the retailer enters into an agreement with a resident of this State under which the resident receives certain consideration for referring potential customers to the retailer through a link on the resident s Internet website or otherwise; and (2) the cumulative gross receipts from sales by the retailer to customers in this State through all such referrals exceeds a certain amount during the preceding four quarterly periods. A retailer may rebut this presumption by providing proof that each resident with whom the retailer has an agreement did not engage in any activity that was significantly associated with the retailer s ability to establish or maintain a market in this State for the retailer s products or services during the preceding four quarterly periods. In Overstock.com v. New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, 987 N.E.2d 621 (2013), the New York Court of Appeals held that the New York law is facially constitutional because, through these agreements with New York residents, a retailer may establish a sufficient nexus with the State of New York to satisfy the requirements of the United States Constitution.

2 EXPLANATION Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 360 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto a new section to read as follows: Not later than 30 days after the Department or the Nevada Tax Commission makes a finding or ruling, or enters into an agreement with a retailer providing, that the provisions of chapters 372 and 374 of NRS relating to the imposition, collection and remittance of the sales tax, and the collection and remittance of the use tax, do not apply to the retailer, despite the presence in this State of an office, distribution facility, warehouse or storage place or similar place of business which is owned or operated by the retailer or an affiliate of the retailer, whether the finding, ruling or agreement is written or oral and whether the finding, ruling or agreement is express or implied, the Department shall submit a report of the finding, ruling or agreement to the Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau for transmittal to: 1. If the Legislature is in session, the Legislature; or 2. If the Legislature is not in session, the Legislative Commission. Sec. 1.5. Chapter 372 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto the provisions set forth as sections 2 and 3 of this act. Sec. 2. 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, it is presumed that the provisions of this chapter relating to the imposition, collection and remittance of the sales tax, and the collection and remittance of the use tax, apply to a retailer if: (a) The retailer is part of a controlled group of corporations that has a component member, other than a common carrier acting in its capacity as such, that has physical presence in this State; and (b) The component member with physical presence in this State: (1) Sells a similar line of products or services as the retailer and does so under a business name that is the same or similar to that of the retailer; (2) Maintains an office, distribution facility, warehouse or storage place or similar place of business in this State to facilitate the delivery of tangible personal property sold by the retailer to the retailer s customers;

3 (3) Uses trademarks, service marks or trade names in this State that are the same or substantially similar to those used by the retailer; (4) Delivers, installs, assembles or performs maintenance services for the retailer s customers within this State; (5) Facilitates the retailer s delivery of tangible personal property to customers in this State by allowing the retailer s customers to pick up tangible personal property sold by the retailer at an office, distribution facility, warehouse, storage place or similar place of business maintained by the component member in this State; or (6) Conducts any other activities in this State that are significantly associated with the retailer s ability to establish and maintain a market in this State for the retailer s products or services. 2. A retailer may rebut the presumption set forth in subsection 1 by providing proof satisfactory to the Department that, during the calendar year in question, the activities of the component member with physical presence in this State are not significantly associated with the retailer s ability to establish or maintain a market in this State for the retailer s products or services. 3. In administering the provisions of this chapter, the Department shall construe the terms seller, retailer and retailer maintaining a place of business in this State in accordance with the provisions of this section. 4. As used in this section: (a) Component member has the meaning ascribed to it in section 1563(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. 1563(b), and includes any entity that, notwithstanding its form of organization, bears the same ownership relationship to the retailer as a corporation that would qualify as a component member of the same controlled group of corporations as the retailer. (b) Controlled group of corporations has the meaning ascribed to it in section 1563(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. 1563(a), and includes any entity that, notwithstanding its form of organization, bears the same ownership relationship to the retailer as a corporation that would qualify as a component member of the same controlled group of corporations as the retailer. Sec. 3. 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, it is presumed that the provisions of this chapter relating to:

4 (a) The imposition, collection and remittance of the sales tax; and (b) The collection and remittance of the use tax, apply to every retailer who enters into an agreement with a resident of this State under which the resident, for a commission or other consideration based upon the sale of tangible personal property by the retailer, directly or indirectly refers potential customers, whether by a link on an Internet website or otherwise, to the retailer, if the cumulative gross receipts from sales by the retailer to customers in this State who are referred to the retailer by all residents with this type of an agreement with the retailer is in excess of $10,000 during the preceding four quarterly periods ending on the last day of March, June, September and December. 2. A retailer may rebut the presumption set forth in subsection 1 by providing proof satisfactory to the Department that each resident with whom the retailer has an agreement did not engage in any activity in this State that was significantly associated with the retailer s ability to establish or maintain a market in this State for the retailer s products or services during the preceding four quarterly periods ending on the last day of March, June, September and December. Such proof may consist of the sworn written statements of each resident with whom the retailer has an agreement stating that the resident did not engage in any solicitation in this State on behalf of the retailer during the preceding four quarterly periods ending on the last day of March, June, September and December, if the statements were obtained from each resident and provided to the Department in good faith. 3. In administering the provisions of this chapter, the Department shall construe the terms seller, retailer and retailer maintaining a place of business in this State in accordance with the provisions of this section. Sec. 4. Chapter 374 of NRS is hereby amended by adding thereto the provisions set forth as sections 5 and 6 of this act. Sec. 5. 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, it is presumed that the provisions of this chapter relating to the imposition, collection and remittance of the sales tax, and the collection and remittance of the use tax, apply to a retailer if: (a) The retailer is part of a controlled group of corporations that has a component member, other than a common carrier acting in its capacity as such, that has physical presence in this State; and (b) The component member with physical presence in this State:

5 (1) Sells a similar line of products or services as the retailer and does so under a business name that is the same or similar to that of the retailer; (2) Maintains an office, distribution facility, warehouse or storage place or similar place of business in this State to facilitate the delivery of tangible personal property sold by the retailer to the retailer s customers; (3) Uses trademarks, service marks or trade names in this State that are the same or substantially similar to those used by the retailer; (4) Delivers, installs, assembles or performs maintenance services for the retailer s customers within this State; (5) Facilitates the retailer s delivery of tangible personal property to customers in this State by allowing the retailer s customers to pick up tangible personal property sold by the retailer at an office, distribution facility, warehouse, storage place or similar place of business maintained by the component member in this State; or (6) Conducts any other activities in this State that are significantly associated with the retailer s ability to establish and maintain a market in this State for the retailer s products or services. 2. A retailer may rebut the presumption set forth in subsection 1 by providing proof satisfactory to the Department that, during the calendar year in question, the activities of the component member with physical presence in this State are not significantly associated with the retailer s ability to establish or maintain a market in this State for the retailer s products or services. 3. In administering the provisions of this chapter, the Department shall construe the terms seller, retailer and retailer maintaining a place of business in this State in accordance with the provisions of this section. 4. As used in this section: (a) Component member has the meaning ascribed to it in section 1563(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. 1563(b), and includes any entity that, notwithstanding its form of organization, bears the same ownership relationship to the retailer as a corporation that would qualify as a component member of the same controlled group of corporations as the retailer. (b) Controlled group of corporations has the meaning ascribed to it in section 1563(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. 1563(a), and includes any entity that, notwithstanding its

6 form of organization, bears the same ownership relationship to the retailer as a corporation that would qualify as a component member of the same controlled group of corporations as the retailer. Sec. 6. 1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, it is presumed that the provisions of this chapter relating to: (a) The imposition, collection and remittance of the sales tax; and (b) The collection and remittance of the use tax, apply to every retailer who enters into an agreement with a resident of this State under which the resident, for a commission or other consideration based upon the sale of tangible personal property by the retailer, directly or indirectly refers potential customers, whether by a link on an Internet website or otherwise, to the retailer, if the cumulative gross receipts from sales by the retailer to customers in this State who are referred to the retailer by all residents with this type of an agreement with the retailer is in excess of $10,000 during the preceding four quarterly periods ending on the last day of March, June, September and December. 2. A retailer may rebut the presumption set forth in subsection 1 by providing proof satisfactory to the Department that each resident with whom the retailer has an agreement did not engage in any activity in this State that was significantly associated with the retailer s ability to establish or maintain a market in this State for the retailer s products or services during the preceding four quarterly periods ending on the last day of March, June, September and December. Such proof may consist of the sworn written statements of each resident with whom the retailer has an agreement stating that the resident did not engage in any solicitation in this State on behalf of the retailer during the preceding four quarterly periods ending on the last day of March, June, September and December, if such statements were obtained from each resident and provided to the Department in good faith. 3. In administering the provisions of this chapter, the Department shall construe the terms seller, retailer and retailer maintaining a place of business in this State in accordance with the provisions of this section. Sec. 6.5. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 7 of this act, in determining whether, pursuant to sections 3 and 6 of this act, a retailer has rebutted the presumption that the provisions of chapters 372 and 374 of NRS relating to the imposition, collection and remittance of the sales tax, and the collection and remittance of

7 the use tax, apply to the retailer, any quarterly periods preceding October 1, 2015, may be considered. Sec. 7. 1. This section and sections 1, 1.5, 2, 4 and 5 of this act become effective on July 1, 2015. 2. Sections 3, 6 and 6.5 of this act become effective on October 1, 2015. 20 ~~~~~ 15