Financial Services Advisory

Similar documents
SEC and CFTC Adopt Product Definitions Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank

Client Advisory. Treasury Proposes Legislation Overhauling Regulation of Over-the-Counter Derivatives. Financial Services

Client Alert. CFTC and SEC Issue Final Rule Defining Certain Swap Products and Triggering Several Dodd-Frank Obligations Relating to Swaps.

MARCH 2014 KEY RECENT DEVELOPMENTS. 1. Overview of FX Swap Regulatory Framework

Re: Further Definition of Swap, Security-Based Swap, and Security-Based Swap Agreement; Mixed Swaps; Security-Based Swap Agreement Recordkeeping,

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank

ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act

The de minimis exception to designation as a Swap Dealer should be available to regional banks and dealers that intermediate regional Swap markets.

Clearing Exemption for Inter-Affiliate Swaps

OTC Derivatives Markets Act of 2009

CFTC, SEC Propose to Delay the Applicability of Certain Swap Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act

Introduction to the Commercial End-User Exception to Mandatory Clearing of Swaps and Security-Based Swaps Under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act

Client Alert. CFTC Publishes Guidance on Expansive New CPO and CTA Regulations

Client Advisory. Senate Passes Financial Regulation Bill Requiring SEC Registration for Hedge Fund Managers with $100 Million or More under Management

Financial Services Advisory

Proposed Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps Under Dodd-Frank

Dodd Frank Update: Impact on Gas & Power Transactions

CFTC and SEC Issue Final Swap-Related Rules Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank

SEC Exemptive Relief in Connection with Effective Date of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

Proposed Treasury Exemption for Foreign Exchange Swaps and Forwards

Client Advisory. SEC Adopts Enhanced Executive Compensation and Governance Disclosure Rules. Securities. Compensation and Risk Management

CFTC Exemptive Relief Upon Effective Date of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

Table of Contents. August 2010 Arnold & Porter LLP

ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act

2017 DERIVATIVES END-USER RELIEF ACT DISCUSSION DRAFT

Swap Clearing and the Commercial End- User Exception: Corporate Governance and Risk Management Issues for Commercial Companies

The CSX Case In Historical Perspective

Legal Alert: CFTC Interprets Swap Definition In the Context of Longevity Risk Transfer

Introduction to the U.S. Regulation of Cross-Border Transactions Involving Swaps and Security-Based Swaps

De r i vat i v e s a n d

CFTC Actions The Energy Industry Should Look For In 2015

Client Alert. CFTC Issues a Flurry of No-Action Letters and Guidance as New Swap Regulations Become Effective. Swap Entity Definition Guidance

Security-Based Swap Execution Facilities

Recent CFTC Issuances

Dodd Frank Update: Impact on Gas & Power Transactions

Swap Clearinghouses and Markets

Title VII Over-the-Counter Derivatives Markets Act of Section-by-Section Analysis. Subtitle A Regulation of Swap Markets

Direct and Significant Connections: CFTC Provides Guidance on Extraterritoriality

Client Alert July 3, 2014

Regulation of Private Funds and Their Advisers Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

August 27, Dear Mr. Stawik:

Security-Based Swaps: Capital, Margin and Segregation Requirements

STROOCK SPECIAL BULLETIN

Dodd-Frank Act OTC Derivatives Reform

Swap Execution Facility Requirements

Impact of Financial Reform On Energy Companies

Department of the Treasury Issues Report Recommending U.S. Capital Markets Regulatory Reforms

Dodd-Frank Title VII: Reforms for the Swaps Marketplace

Interest Rate Risk Management Refresher. April 29, Presented to: Howard Sakin Section I. Basics of Interest Rate Hedging?

The Final Municipal Advisor Rule: Navigating the Minefield

the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 for those security-based swaps that prior to July 16, 2011 were

August 13, De Minimis Exception to the Swap Dealer Definition (RIN 3038 AE68)

To Our Clients and Friends Memorandum friedfrank.com

This memorandum provides a general overview of the new rules, rule amendments

Regulatory Practice Letter August 2014 RPL 14-11

Roadmap to the Dodd Frank: Rulemakings, Studies, and Reports

Client Alert. CFTC Issues Proposals on the Extraterritorial Application of US Swaps Regulations. Overview

E-ALERT Dodd-Frank Act

The Securities and Exchange Commission ( Commission ) is (i) extending certain

CFTC Issues Final Rules on Cross- Border Uncleared Swap Margin Requirements

US OTC derivatives reforms Impact on UK and other non-us asset managers. Second update October 2013

Client Alert. CFTC Proposes to Exempt Certain Energy-Related Transactions from Derivatives Regulations. Overview

Dodd-frank implementation update: key differences between the CFTC and SEC final business conduct standards and related cross-border requirements

SEC Re-Proposes Rules Establishing a U.S. Personnel Test for Application of Dodd-Frank Security-Based Swap Requirements

Via Electronic Service at comments.cftc.gov May 27, 2014

Implementation of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

Cleared Security-Based Swap Transactions Involving Eligible Contract Participants (File Number S )

CFTC and SEC Adopt New Rules Further Defining Major Swap Participant and Major Security-Based Swap Participant

ALERT. U.S. Banking Regulators Finalize Minimum Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps. Asset Management. January 8, 2016

DERIVATIVES & STRUCTURED PRODUCTS

U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Three Lafayette Centre st Street, NW, Washington, DC Telephone: (202)

Commodity Options and Agricultural Swaps, RIN 3038 AD21

Dodd Frank and inter affiliate trading of derivatives

Trusts and Estates Advisory

Dodd-Frank Title VII: Three Years Out, Still Buyer Beware

CFTC Issues Final Order Granting Temporary Relief from Dodd-Frank Swaps Regulation

2017 Market Terms in Independent Sponsor Transactions

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Health Information Privacy and Security Provisions Here We Go Again

Futures & Derivatives Law

Futures & Derivatives Law

ALI-ABA Conference on Life Insurance Company Products November 3-4, 2011 Washington, D.C.

CLIENT UPDATE FINAL CFTC RULES ON CLEARING EXEMPTION FOR SWAPS BETWEEN CERTAIN AFFILIATED ENTITIES

Financial Services Advisory

Is your investment management company regulated by the US CFTC?

Interest Rate Risk Management Refresher. April 27, Presented to: Section I. Basics of Interest Rate Hedging?

Proposed Guidance for Certain Natural Gas and Electric Power Contracts (RIN3235-AL93)

Client Update CFTC Adopts Margin Rules for Non-Cleared Swaps

ensure the involvement of an adequate cross-section of market participants from the beginning of the implementation of the new regulatory regime.

The road to reform. Helping commercial end users of OTC derivatives comply with Dodd-Frank s Title VII

Federal Reserve and Treasury Provide TALF Pricing, Haircuts and Other Further Revised Terms

Incident Investigations on Multi-Employer Work Sites. OSHA Oil & Gas Safety Conference December 5, 2018

A View From the Street

Projected Compliance Timelines for the CFTC s Trading Documentation Rules and Uncleared Swap Margin Rules

Dodd-Frank Act: Are You Ready? Mark. R. Haskell, Floyd L. Norton, IV, Michael M. Philipp, Levi McAllister

KPMG TaxWatch Webcast: Taxation of Derivatives and Hedging Transactions and Developments in the Derivatives Markets

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

EMIR and DODD-FRANK FAQs. January 2017

Impact on End Users of Swaps

February 22, RIN 3038 AD20 -- Swap Data Repositories. Dear Mr. Stawick:

U.S. Response: Jurisdictions Authority and Process for Exercising Deference in Relation to OTC Derivatives Regulation

Transcription:

Financial Services Advisory September 7, 2012 CFTC, SEC Finalize Product Definitions I. Introduction On July 9 and 10, 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission (collectively, the Commissions ) approved joint final rules and interpretations regarding the definition and regulation of swaps, security-based swaps, mixed swaps and security-based swap agreements (the Definitions ). The Definitions were adopted pursuant to Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act or DFA ), which mandated the CFTC and SEC to further define and refine the definitions in the DFA relating to swaps and security-based swaps (collectively, Title VII instruments ). Under this framework, the SEC has regulatory authority over security-based swaps, the CFTC has regulatory authority over swaps, the agencies will jointly regulate mixed swaps, and the SEC will continue to have antifraud authority over certain CFTC-regulated instruments, including securitybased swap agreements. For more information, please contact any of the following members of Katten s Financial Services Practice. Guy C. Dempsey, Jr. 212.940.8593 guy.dempsey@kattenlaw.com Carolyn H. Jackson +44 (0) 20 7776 7625 carolyn.jackson@kattenlaw.co.uk Nathaniel W. Lalone +44 (0) 20 7776 7629 nathaniel.lalone@kattenlaw.co.uk Ross Pazzol 312.902.5554 ross.pazzol@kattenlaw.com The Definitions were published in the Federal Register on August 13, 2012, 1 and will become effective on October 12, 2012. The occurrence of the effective date for the Definitions will trigger effective and compliance dates for many other rules promulgated by the Dodd-Frank Act, including the rule requiring registration with the CFTC for anyone who falls within the definition of Dealer or Major Participant (as defined in the DFA and related CFTC regulations). II. Executive Summary The Definitions are extremely long and detailed and provide guidance on classifying particular agreements, contracts and transactions as swaps, security-based swaps or mixed swaps, which in turn determines the relevant agency or agencies, rules and regulations to which a particular instrument will be subject. The guidance includes both formal rules and interpretations based on existing law and precedent. Appendix 1 provides a non-exhaustive list of many of the different types of derivatives transactions discussed in the Definitions and classifies them as either swaps or security-based swaps, citing to the relevant rules or interpretations behind such classification. The Definitions also provide clarification that 1) security-based swap agreements are not subject to additional books and records beyond those required by the CFTC for swap agreements, and 2) transactions that are deemed to have been structured to evade the registration of Title VII will be treated as swaps nonetheless. 1 Further Definition of, Security-Based, and Security-Based Agreement ; Mixed s; Security-Based Agreement Recordkeeping, 77 Fed. Reg. 48208 (August 13, 2012). www.kattenlaw.com

III. s The Commissions adopted both final rules and interpretations in the Definitions defining certain types of transactions as swaps. The rules define the following transactions as swaps: Foreign exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps (unless exempted by the Secretary of the Treasury) Foreign currency options Non-deliverable forwards in foreign exchange Currency swaps and cross-currency swaps Forward rate agreements The interpretations provide that the following instruments are swaps: Title VII instruments based on interest rates and monetary rates, including interbank offered rates, money market rates, government target rates, general lending rates and rates from indexes, among others Title VII instruments based on rates or yields of US Treasury and other exempted securities (other than municipal securities) Title VII instruments based on broad-based security indexes Guarantees of swaps, to the extent that a counterparty to a swap position would have recourse to the guarantor in connection with the position Broad-based index credit default swaps that require cash settlement or auction settlement Although not expressly mentioned in the Definitions, commodity swaps and commodity options are swaps. Commodity swaps and options on such products are expressly included in the definition of a swap pursuant to Title VII. In addition, the CFTC s rule regarding commodity options states that all commodity options are to be treated as a swap for purposes of Title VII. 2 The CFTC announced that it would address the practical implications of treating guarantees of swaps as swaps for regulatory purpose in a separate release and that market participants would not have to comply with this interpretation until the effective date of that other future release. IV. Security-Based s The interpretations provide that the following instruments are considered security-based swaps: Title VII instruments based on yields, where yield is a proxy for the price or value of a debt security, loan or narrow-based security index, subject to certain exceptions for government debt obligations Total return swaps on a single security, loan or narrow-based security index Title VII instruments based on narrow-based security indexes, where narrow-based security index is defined by the criteria set forth in Section 1a(35) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the CEA ), and the rules and regulations issued by the Commissions relating to the definition The SEC will not regard the guarantee of a security-based swap as either part of the security-based swap or as a separate security-based swap. Rather, the SEC will consider requiring that the reporting of security-based swaps include the reporting of information about the guarantors of obligations under the security-based swap. The SEC also notes that because a security-based swap is a security, and that the guarantee of any security is also a security, the guarantee of a security-based swap is a security subject to federal securities laws and regulations. 2 Commodity Options, 77 Fed. Reg. 25320 (April 27, 2012). 2

V. Mixed s Mixed swaps are swaps that fall under the definitions of both swaps and security-based swaps, governed by both the SEC and the CFTC. The scope of the mixed swap definition is intended to be narrow, designed to prevent gaps in the regulation of securitybased swaps and swaps. The Commissions adopted two rules with respect to the regulation of mixed swaps. First, bilateral uncleared mixed swaps will be regulated by the CEA, related CFTC rules, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act ) and related federal securities rules and regulations. Second, for all other mixed swaps, the rules establish a process by which parties to mixed swaps may request that the swap comply, as to parallel provisions, with either the CEA or the Exchange Act. Examples of mixed swaps provided by the Commissions include the following: Total return swaps with either embedded interest rate optionality or a non-securities component A portfolio of securities and commodities Broad-based index credit default swaps requiring mandatory physical settlement VI. Security-Based Agreements The Commissions define a security-based swap agreement (as opposed to a security-based swap) as a swap (such as a total return swap on a broad-based security index) that is regulated by the CFTC but which involves securities. (The CFTC confusingly refers to such swaps as equity swaps. ) The CFTC has regulatory and enforcement authority over security-based swap agreements, but the SEC has antifraud, anti-manipulation and other authority. The interpretations provide that instruments such as swaps based on a broad-based security index and index credit default swaps based on a broad-based security index are security-based swap agreements. Despite the SEC s regulatory and enforcement authority, the Definitions clarify that security-based swap agreements are not required to comply with additional books and records other than those adopted by the CFTC for swaps. VII. Transactions That Are Not s or Security-Based s One of the concerns voiced by commenters about the breadth of the definition of a swap in the DFA is that there are many products that might be inadvertently swept up into the new regulatory regime. A large portion of the Definitions consequently deals with excluding transactions such as insurance products, consumer and commercial transactions, and forward contracts for nonfinancial commodities from the scope of the definitions. Insurance Insurance contracts are not considered swaps or security-based swaps if the contracts satisfy both a Product Test and Provider Test. The Product Test requires that: The beneficiary have an insurable interest that is the subject of the contract; The loss occurs and is proven; The payment is limited to the value of the insurable interest; and The contract is not traded. The Provider Test requires that the insurance contract must be provided by: A person subject to supervision by the insurance commissioner of any state or by the United States; The United States or any state or respective agency; In the case of reinsurance, a person providing the agreement, contract or transaction to another person who satisfies the conditions of the provider test, subject to certain limitations; or In the case of non-admitted insurance, a person located outside of the United States, subject to additional. 3

The Definitions provide a safe harbor for certain enumerated types of traditional insurance products. These enumerated products will not be considered swaps or security-based swaps provided they satisfy the Provider Test and are any of the following products: A surety or fidelity bond; Life, health, long-term care, title, disability or property and casual insurance; An annuity; Insurance against default on individual residential mortgages; or Reinsurance of any of the above products. The Commissions provide that a product that does not fall into the preceding categories is not necessarily a swap or securitybased swap. In such a situation, the Commissions require a further analysis to determine whether the product is an insurance product, a swap or a security-based swap. The Definitions additionally contain a grandfathering provision such that existing insurance products entered into prior to the effective date of the rules will not be considered swaps or security-based swaps. Commercial and Consumer Transactions Transactions entered into by consumers for primarily personal, family or household purposes will not be considered swaps or security-based swaps. Commercial agreements, contracts or transactions that involve customary business are also not considered swaps or security-based swaps. The interpretations provide the following examples of commercial transactions that are not considered swaps or security-based swaps: Commercial loans by the Federal Home Loan Banks Commercial loans by Farm Credit institutions The interpretations provide the following examples of consumer transactions that are not considered swaps or security-based swaps: Certain residential fuel storage contracts Service contracts Consumer options to buy, sell or lease real or personal property Certain consumer guarantees of loans, i.e., credit cards, automobile and mortgage Consumer transactions used to purchase nonfinancial energy commodities Forward Contracts Forward contracts in nonfinancial commodities 3 that intend for the physical delivery of the underlying commodity are not considered swaps 4 or security-based swaps. The CFTC continues to view such contracts as commercial merchandising transactions, the primary purpose of which is to transfer ownership of the underlying commodity and not to solely transfer price risk. The CFTC is also withdrawing its 1993 Energy Exemption. The definitions of swap and security-based swap exclude sales of nonfinancial securities or commodities for deferred shipment or delivery, as long as the transaction is intended to be physically settled. Security forward contracts are expressly excluded from the definition of a swap and are, in fact, securities, subject to regulation under the federal securities laws. 3 The CFTC interprets a nonfinancial commodity as a commodity that can be physically delivered and that is an exempt or agricultural commodity. In addition, intangible commodities that are not an excluded commodity and which can be physically delivered, such as emission allowances, also qualify as nonfinancial commodities. 4 The CFTC has stated that the forward exclusion for nonfinancial commodities in the swap definition and in any book-out transactions will be interpreted in a manner consistent with the CFTC s historical interpretations of the existing forward exclusion with respect to futures contracts. 4

VIII. Determination of Classification The Definitions provide that the classification of a Title VII product must be determined prior to its execution, but that the product will retain its initial characterization throughout its life and will be regulated by the same agency and until its expiration. This rule applies even if an instrument is based upon an index that migrates from narrow to broad or vice versa. With respect to such instruments based on indexes that migrate from narrow to broad or vice versa, the rules provide the following example:...if two counterparties enter into a swap based on a broad-based security index, and three months into the life of the swap the security index underlying that Title VII instrument migrates from being broad-based to being narrow-based, the Title VII instrument will remain a swap for the duration of its life and will not be recharacterized as a security-based swap. 5 The Definitions create a process by which any person may request that the Commissions issue a joint interpretation as to whether a contract, agreement or transaction is a swap, security-based swap or mixed swap. The concept of a joint interpretation is useful, but the process by which to obtain such an interpretation has not been executed in a market-sensitive or market-friendly way. The Commissions have discretion over which requests for interpretations they evaluate and, even if they decide to grant a request for interpretation of an instrument, they have 120 days to reach a decision. IX. Anti-Evasion The CFTC adopted rules that define transactions structured to willfully evade the provisions of Title VII as swaps. It is also unlawful to conduct activities outside of the United States in an effort to evade Title VII. X. Distinguishing Futures from s The Definitions do not propose rules or interpretations to distinguish futures from swaps. The CFTC affirmatively declined to provide a clarification or adopt a rule to distinguish between the two economically similar products. A designated contact market may self-certify its contracts to be futures subject to the CFTC s oversight authority, request prior approval from the CFTC, request an interpretation from the CFTC or request a rulemaking by the CFTC. 5 See Definitions, page 48286. 5

Appendix 1: Product Classifications from the Definitions Instrument Classification Rule/Interpretation Foreign exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps, unless exempted by the Secretary of the Treasury CFTC Rule 1.3 (xxx)(2)(3); SEC and (c) Currency options CFTC Rule 1.3 (xxx)(2); SEC Foreign currency options CFTC Rule 1.3 (xxx)(2); SEC Foreign exchange options CFTC Rule 1.3 (xxx)(2); SEC Foreign exchange rate options CFTC Rule 1.3 (xxx)(2); SEC Currency swaps and cross-currency swaps CFTC Rule 1.3 (xxx)(2); SEC Forward rate agreements CFTC Rule 1.3 (xxx)(2); SEC Non-deliverable forwards in foreign exchange CFTC Rule 1.3 (xxx)(2); SEC Title VII instruments based on or referencing qualifying foreign futures contracts on the debt securities of the US government or of any one or more of the 21 foreign governments enumerated in rule 3a12-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, subject to certain conditions CFTC Rule 1.3 (bbbb); SEC Rule 240.3a68-5 Permutations of, or options on, swaps Interpretation II (C)(4) Permutations of, or options on, security-based swaps Security-based swap Interpretation II (C)(4) Contracts for differences Title VII instruments based on interest rates and monetary rates, including interbank offered rates, money market rates, government target rates, general lending rates and indexes, among others Title VII instruments based on rates or yields of US Treasury and other exempted securities (other than municipal securities) or security-based swap, depending on the underlying product of that particular CFD transaction Interpretation II (C)(5) Interpretation III (B)(1) Interpretation III (B)(2) Title VII instruments based on broad-based security indexes Interpretation III (G)(4) Guarantees of swaps, to the extent that a counterparty to a swap position would have recourse to the guarantor in connection with the position Interpretation II (B)(1)(g) Guarantees of security-based swaps Security Interpretation II (B)(1)(g) Broad-based index credit default swaps that require cash settlement or auction settlement Interpretation III (H) Title VII instruments on futures that are not security futures Interpretation III (E) Title VII instruments on security futures 1 Security-based swap Interpretation III (E) 1 Security futures are defined in both the CEA and the Exchange Act as a futures contract on a single security or a narrow-based security index, except an exempted security under Section 3(a)(12) of the Exchange Act. 6

Instrument Classification Rule/Interpretation Title VII instruments based on yields, where yield is a proxy for the price or value of a debt security, loan or narrow-based security index, subject to certain exceptions for government debt obligations Total return swaps on a single security, loan or narrow-based security index Security-based swap Security-based swap Interpretation III (B)(2) Interpretation III (C) Title VII instruments based on narrow-based security indexes Security-based swap Interpretation III (G) Quanto equity swaps Total return swaps into which counterparties embed interest rate optionality or a non-securities component Broad-based index credit default swaps that require mandatory physical settlement Commodity swaps and commodity options Insurance products Forward contracts on nonfinancial commodities Consumer/commercial transactions Loan participations Security-based swap, subject to certain Mixed swap Mixed swap Interpretation III (C) Interpretation III (C) Interpretation III (H) Title VII and the Commodity Option Release CFTC Rule 1.3 (xxx)(4); SEC Rule 240.3a69-1 Interpretation II (B)(2) Interpretation II (B)(3) Interpretations II (B)(3) www.kattenlaw.com CHARLOTTE CHICAGO IRVING LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK OAKLAND ORANGE COUNTY SHANGHAI WASHINGTON, DC Published as a source of information only. The material contained herein is not to be construed as legal advice or opinion. 2012 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP. All rights reserved. Circular 230 Disclosure: Pursuant to regulations governing practice before the Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership including professional corporations that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997). London affiliate: Katten Muchin Rosenman UK LLP. 9/6/12 7