DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE LOW INCOME PANEL

Similar documents
DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS PANEL

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE SITE INVESTIGATION AND REMEDIATION PANEL

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE FINANCE PANEL

Proposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service

Attachment 3 - PECO Statement No. 2 Direct Testimony and Exhibits of Alan B. Cohn

. BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SHARON A. MCGINNIS (STAFFING, COMPENSATION, AND BENEFITS)

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation d/b/a National Grid

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

EXETER ASSOCIATES, INC Little Patuxent Parkway Suite 300 Columbia, Maryland 21044

Energy Affordability Policies and Programs in New York State. January 17, 2018

Rev. Proc CONTENTS SECTION 1. PURPOSE

UGI Utilities, Inc. Gas Division And UGI Penn Natural Gas, Inc. Universal Service Program. Final Evaluation Report

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DAVID L. CHONG

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF ANTHONY S. CAMPAGIORNI (POLICY AND OVERVIEW)

GAS AFFORDABILITY SERVICE PROGRAM ( PROGRAM )

Before the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission of the State of South Dakota

CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. & CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT. for the period ended

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION

S T A T E OF M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * *

CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. & CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT. for the period ended

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

BEFORE THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS. DOUG LITTLE, Chairman BOB STUMP BOB BURNS TOM FORESE ANDY TOBIN

CHAPTER 4 COST RECOVERY AND REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF REGINALD M. AUSTRIA ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. & CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT. for the period ended

STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PECO ENERGY COMPANY ELECTRIC DIVISION

CHAPTER III COST TRACKING & REGULATORY TREATMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JOHNNY M. HULEIS

CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. & CENTRAL HUDSON GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT. for the period ended

STATE OF ILLINOIS ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION : : : : ORDER

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Jeffrey L.

Before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission State of Minnesota. Docket No. E002/GR Exhibit (LRP-1) Decoupling


AND NOTICE OF HEARING REVIEW OF NON-PAYMENT OF ACCOUNT SERVICE CHARGES FOR ELECTRCITY AND NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTORS BOARD FILE NO.

UGI Utilities, Inc. Gas Division UGI Utilities, Inc. Electric Division UGI Penn Natural Gas, Inc. UGI Central Penn Gas, Inc.

Residential Line and Service Extension Allowance Testimony. Application No.: Witnesses: C. Silsbee S. Reed J. Schichtl L. Vellanoweth (U 338-E)

Regulatory Treatment of. (Low-Income) Customers. Office of Consumer Services October 12, 2010

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

1

GENERAL INFORMATION 11. REFUSAL OR DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF UTAH ROCKY MOUNTAIN POWER. Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding

BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN

DOCKET NO. 13A-0773EG DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS OF LEE E. GABLER

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * *

BEFORE THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

I. INTRODUCTION. A. My name is Barry F. Blackwell and my business address is 1000 East Main Street, Q. BY WHOM ARE YOU EMPLOYED AND IN WHAT CAPACITY?

2015 General Rate Case

SUPERINTENDENT CONTRACT BETWEEN. Hudson Area Schools. - and - Michael Osborne

STATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) PREFILED TESTIMONY OF LAUREN HAMMER ON BEHALF OF VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC.

Rate Case Process and Rate-Based Ratemaking

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No. R Direct Testimony of Richard A.

Line No. WITNESS: JEFFREY L. ADAMS Page 1 A. INTRODUCTION. Q. Please state your name and business address. B. PURPOSE

UGI UTILITIES, INC. GAS DIVISION

PSC NO. 4 GAS LEAF: 51 ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. Issued in compliance with Order in Case No. 15-G-0244 dated 04/20/17 GENERAL INFORMATION

SECOND REVISED SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KENNETH J. DEREMER (POST-TEST YEAR RATEMAKING) April 6, 2018

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

New York GJGNY/On-Bill Recovery Financing Webinar 10/2/2012. Jeff Pitkin, Treasurer New York State Energy Research and Development Authority

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

KEEGAN WERLIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 265 FRANKLIN STREET BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS March 17, 2014

Docket No U Docket No U FINAL ORDER

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

PacifiCorp d/b/a Pacific Power encloses for filing in this docket the following documents:

NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS COMPANY P.U.C. Or. 25 Fourth Revision of Sheet Cancels Third Revision of Sheet 195-1

Public Service Commission CAPITAL CIRCLE OFFICE CENTER 2540 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

NORTHERN UTILITIES, INC. DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DANIEL T. NAWAZELSKI LEAD-LAG STUDY EXHIBIT DTN-1. New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission

STATE OF NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW BEFORE THE HONORABLE WALTER J. BRASWELL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN WALLACH

CHAPTER 5 REVENUE REQUIREMENT PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF KAREN C. CHAN AND RAMON GONZALES ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SDG&E DIRECT TESTIMONY OF STEVEN P. DAIS (WORKING CASH) October 6, 2017 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company Gas 45

PECO Energy Universal Services Program. Final Evaluation Report

FILED :56 AM

SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION. Of the. Arthritis Foundation Defined Contribution Retirement Plan Revised January 1, 2013

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company Gas 57

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY Docket No. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket No.

PECO Energy Customer Assistance Program For Customers Below 50 Percent of Poverty Final Evaluation Report

Remarks of Donna M.J. Clark Vice President and General Counsel Energy Association of Pennsylvania November 1, 2011

GILLARD, BAUER, MAZRUM, FLORIP, SMIGELSKI & GULDEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 109 E. CHISHOLM STREET ALPENA, MICHIGAN March 29, 2018

Office for Capital Facilities

CASE NO. 1D David P. Healy of Law Offices of David P. Healy, PLC, Tallahassee, for Appellants.

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

Consumer Protection, Dispute Settlement and Enforcement in New York. Paul Powers, Executive Deputy

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION v. PECO ENERGY COMPANY DOCKET NO.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES

DIRECT TESTIMONY OF PAUL E. HAERING (CAPITAL PLAN)

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA. on behalf of.

ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN. SUMMARY OF 403(b) PLAN PROVISIONS

RIO BRAVO-GREELEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 403(B) PLAN SUMMARY OF 403(B) PLAN PROVISIONS

QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and

Senate Bill No. 146 Senator Spearman

Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC Docket No. RP Exhibit No. TPC-0079

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO * * * * *

Ohio Edison, The Illuminating Company & Toledo Edison

Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A. My name is Suzanne E. Sieferman, and my business address is 1000 East Main

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Approval of the Annual Report to the Board on the Regionally Competitive Rates Policy

BEFORE THE PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY DOCKET NO. R Direct Testimony of Kevin M.

BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 100 Washington Square, Suite 1700 Minneapolis MN

Transcription:

BEFORE THE NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation for Electric Service Case -E- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x Proceeding on Motion of the Commission as to the Rates, Charges, Rules and Regulations of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation for Gas Service Case -G- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THE LOW INCOME PANEL July, 0

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY... III. NEW LOW INCOME BILL DISCOUNT PROGRAM... IV. CURRENT LOW INCOME PROGRAM & EPOP... V. ARREARS FORGIVENESS PROGRAM... VI. RECONNECTION FEE WAIVER PROGRAM... VII. DEFERRAL OF LOW INCOME PROGRAM COSTS... i

Case -E- ; Case -G- 0 I. INTRODUCTION Q. Please state the names of the members of the Low Income Panel ( Panel ). A. Our names are Linda M. Harrison, Paula Coppin and Beth Monaco. Q. Ms. Harrison, please state your current employer and business address. A. I am currently employed by Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation ( Central Hudson or the Company ) and my business address is South Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 0. Q. Ms. Harrison, in what capacity are you employed by Central Hudson and what is your scope of responsibilities? A. I am employed by Central Hudson as the Manager of Customer Account Services. I am responsible for managing Call Center, Outreach, Collections, Meter Reading and Commercial Operations. Q. Ms. Harrison, what is your educational background and professional experience? A. I received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration from Marist College in and a Master in Business Administration from Marist College in. Since, I have been employed continuously by Central Hudson in a variety of positions throughout the Company including Customer Services, Human Resources and Accounting.

Case -E- ; Case -G- 0 Q. Ms. Harrison, have you previously testified before the New York State Public Service Commission ( PSC or the Commission )? A. Yes, I have testified before the Commission, most recently in Cases -E- 0, -G-0, 0-E-0 and 0-G-0. Q. Ms. Coppin, please state your current employer and business address. A. I am employed by Central Hudson and my business address is South Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 0. Q. Ms. Coppin, in what capacity are you employed by Central Hudson and what is your scope of responsibilities? A. I am employed by Central Hudson as the Operating Supervisor Community Relations & Consumer Outreach. In this position, I am responsible for discerning and meeting the needs of the Company s special needs customers. In concert with this, I am responsible for consumer education programs, public participation and training programs for Company employees in customer-contact positions. It is also my responsibility to work with the New York State Department of Public Service ( Staff ) and various Company representatives on the investigation and resolution of consumer complaints. Q. Ms. Coppin, what is your educational background and professional experience? A. I have been employed by Central Hudson since in a variety of positions throughout the Company including Customer Services, Meter Reading and Legal. In these positions, my responsibilities included

Case -E- ; Case -G- 0 Customer Service Representative and Customer Accounts Services- Supervisor, Meter Reader, and Legal Assistant to the Executive Vice President and General Counsel. Q. Ms. Coppin, have you previously testified before the Commission? A. No, I have not. Q. Ms. Monaco, please state your current employer and business address. A. I am employed by Central Hudson and my business address is South Avenue, Poughkeepsie, New York 0. Q. Ms. Monaco, in what capacity are you employed by Central Hudson and what is your scope of responsibilities? A. I am employed by Central Hudson as a Customer Account Services Supervisor Community Relations & Consumer Outreach. I am responsible for managing the Company s payment assistance programs, which include the Enhanced Powerful Opportunity Program ( EPOP ) and the Low- Income Bill Credit, the Reconnection Waiver Program and the Good Neighbor Fund. I am also responsible for overseeing and supporting Outreach and Call Center representatives and handling PSC complaints. Q. Ms. Monaco, what is your educational background and professional experience? A. I received an Associates Degree in Liberal Arts from Dutchess Community College in. Since 00, I have been employed continuously by Central Hudson in a variety of positions in Customer Account Services.

Case -E- ; Case -G- Q. Ms. Monaco, have you previously testified before the Commission? A. No, I have not. II. PURPOSE OF TESTIMONY 0 Q. What is the purpose of the Panel s testimony? A. The purpose of the Panel s testimony is to describe changes to phase out our existing Low Income Programs, in accordance with the Orders in Case -M-0 ( Low Income Proceeding ), and outline the New Low Income Program. Specifically, we will: ) describe the Company s new Low Income Bill Discount Program; ) outline the phase-out of the existing Low Income Bill Discount Program and EPOP; ) provide the Company s position on the continuation of an Arrears Forgiveness Program; ) summarize the continuation of the Reconnection Waiver program; and ) discuss the Company s proposed deferral of Low Income Program costs. Q. Is the Panel sponsoring any exhibits in support of its testimony? A. Yes, we are sponsoring the following exhibits:. Exhibit (LIP-), entitled Low Income Program Costs which includes a projection of New and Current Low Income Bill Discount Programs, Phase-Out of EPOP Expenditures, and Reconnection Fee Waiver Program Expenditures.. Exhibit (LIP-), entitled New Low Income Bill Discount Program which includes projection details of the New Low Income Bill Discount Program for the Home Energy Assistance Program ( HEAP ) Seasons

Case -E- ; Case -G- through November 00. The HEAP Season begins each year in November. This exhibit reflects the twelve months of credits December November which lags the HEAP Season by one month. Each Exhibit was prepared by or under the supervision of the Panel or one of the Panel s members. III. NEW LOW INCOME BILL DISCOUNT PROGRAM 0 Q. Has the Commission taken action recently regarding utility low income programs? A. Yes. The Commission instituted the Low Income Proceeding on January, 0 to address low income customer concerns. On May 0, 0, the Commission issued its Order Adopting Low Income Program Modifications and Directing Utility Filings in Case -M-0 ( Low Income Order ). In the Low Income Order the Commission adopted a framework for low income program design providing for tiered discounts and directed utilities to submit implementation plans. The Low Income Order sets forth a standardized low-income program intended to target an energy burden for low income customers at or below % of household income and provides for tiered discount levels. In compliance with this Order, on September, 0, Central Hudson submitted its Implementation Plan, which replaces the Company s current Low Income program as we discuss later in our testimony. On February, 0 the Commission issued its Order Approving Implementation Plans with Modifications in Case -M-0

Case -E- ; Case -G- 0 ( Implementation Order ) as well as its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Requests for Reconsideration and Petitions for Rehearing. Q. Would the Panel please provide an overview of the Company s New Low Income Bill Discount Program ( New Low Income Program or New Program )? A. As described in the Company s Implementation Plan approved in the Implementation Order, Central Hudson will replace the current Low Income Bill Discount Program ( Current Low Income Program or Current Program ) with this New Program effective on or about November, 0, coincident with the start of the 0/0 HEAP season. Low income customers receiving HEAP assistance for their Central Hudson electric and/or gas services, or other fuel services (e.g. oil, propane, wood), will be eligible and enrolled into the New Program. Additionally, the New Program will include the following components: monthly low income bill discounts; automatic enrollment in Budget Billing with an optout option; and reconnection fee waivers. The customers under this program will be entitled to monthly discounts once qualified, annually. The Company plans to have all components of this New Program fully implemented by year end 0. Q. What are the monthly low income bill discounts provided under the New Program? A. The new monthly low income bill discounts are shown in Table.

Case -E- ; Case -G- Table New Monthly Low Income Bill Discounts Tiered Benefit Levels Income Level Electric Heating Electric Non-Heat Gas Heating Tier $ $ $0 $ Tier $ $ $ $ Tier $ $ $ $ Tier $ $ $0 $ Gas Non- Heat Q. What is the forecasted participation level once the New Program has full enrollment? A. The Implementation Order assumes a total participation level of, customers which we have used for our cost forecast phased in over a three-year period. Q. What are the forecasted costs for the Low Income Bill Discount component for the New Program in accordance with the Implementation Order? A. The Company forecasted the following costs for the bill discount component of the New Program, which assumes a 0% participation level in the first twelve months, an 0% participation level in the second twelve months and 0% participation in the third twelve-month period. The twelve-month periods shown reflect the lag of credits following customer enrollment in HEAP. These costs are shown in Table and are also detailed in Exhibit (LIP-). These projections were provided to the Revenue Requirements Panel. 0

Case -E- ; Case -G- Table : Bill Discount Costs Period Costs ($ million) December 0 November 0 $. December 0 November 0 $. December 0 November 00 $.0 Rate Year Ended Costs ($ million) June 0, 0 $. June 0, 00 $. June 0, 0 $. Q. Why has the Company assumed lower participation rates than those identified in the Implementation Order? A. The Company proposes to phase in the participation levels due to the uncertainty of a number of factors that may impact identifying those customers receiving HEAP for fuel types not provided by Central Hudson. As noted in the Low Income Proceeding, the Office of Temporary Disability Assistance ( OTDA ), other affected state agencies and utilities will continue working to develop processes to ensure the accuracy of this data. The expectation is that it will take a number of years to achieve the full participation level set forth in the Implementation Order. Q. Please address how the funding limits established in the Low Income Order may impact budgets and costs associated with the New Program. A. The Low Income Order establishes a funding limit, providing that the total program budget may not exceed % of total electric or gas revenues for sales to end-use customers. If the budget per the prescribed benefit calculation (i.e., total energy burden at or below % of household income)

Case -E- ; Case -G- 0 exceeds the funding limit, the target energy burden will be increased (and as a result, discounts are decreased) until the funding limit is met. The Low Income Order directed the utilities to update their implementation plans annually, at which time adjustments would be made so that program budgets remain within the prescribed funding levels of the Low Income Order. The current total budget established in the Implementation Order for Central Hudson is $.0 million which represents.% of the Company s 0 revenues. At this time, Central Hudson does not expect to exceed the funding limits established in the Low Income Proceeding with the program structure described in this testimony. Q. Are there any other programs or services available to low income customers to assist in lowering their energy bills? A. Yes. Central Hudson established a community lighting program as part of its Energy Efficiency Portfolio where the Company partnered with local social service agencies to provide free LED lights to low income participants. Also, as described more fully in the testimony of the Customer Engagement Panel, the Company s CenHub website serves all customers including low income customers. Account holders who sign into CenHub have access to energy savings tips through CenHub Insights and rebates on energy efficient products through the CenHub store. The services offered through our website to all customers including low income are designed to assist customers in reducing their energy burden. In

Case -E- ; Case -G- addition, Central Hudson will continue to refer customers to NYSERDA for energy efficiency programs. IV. CURRENT LOW INCOME PROGRAM & EPOP 0 Q. Please describe the phase-out of the Current Low Income Program. A. Central Hudson s Current Low Income program was initially implemented in Cases 0-E-0 and 0-G-0 and continued in the Order Approving Rate Plan in Cases -E-0 and -G-0 ( 0 Rate Plan ). The Current Low Income Program will be replaced with the New Low Income Program described above on or about November, 0. Q. What costs have been included in this filing for the Current Low Income Program? A. No costs have been included in this filing since it is assumed that all customers who qualified for the Current Low Income Program would have received their full twelve months of benefits or have been enrolled in the New Program. Q. Please describe the phase-out of EPOP. A. The Company s EPOP was initially established in Cases 0-E-0 and 0-G-0 and approved in all subsequent Central Hudson rate proceedings, including the 0 Rate Plan. Consistent with its Implementation Plan approved in the Low Income Order and the Implementation Order, Central Hudson stopped accepting new enrollment in EPOP on April, 0. All customers who were enrolled as of April

Case -E- ; Case -G-, 0 will no longer receive the Discounted Budget Bill Credits and the Incentive Credit once they qualify for, and are enrolled in, the New Program on or about November, 0. EPOP customers will continue to receive the Arrears Forgiveness component of EPOP until they have completed or exit out of EPOP. Program benefits under EPOP are available for up to months; therefore, the Arrears Forgiveness component of this program is forecasted to expire by March 00. Q. What costs are included in this filing associated with EPOP? A. The only costs remaining for this program included in this rate filing are costs for the Arrears Forgiveness component, which is set forth in Exhibit (LIP-). The forecast for the twelve months ended June 0, 0 ( Rate Year ) is $,. The Arrears Forgiveness component of EPOP will expire in 00. 0 V. ARREARS FORGIVENESS PROGRAM Q. Does the Low Income Order provide for a Central Hudson Arrears Forgiveness Program? A. The Low Income Order allowed, but did not require, an Arrears Forgiveness Program. The Low Income Order imposed a limit of funding for arrears forgiveness programs of no more than % of a company s budget. Any such allocation to arrears forgiveness must be incremental to, and not reduce, the amount directed to the rate discount and must fit within the % budget cap. The amount approved in the Implementation

Case -E- ; Case -G- Order for the phase-out of this program was $0, annually. It should be noted that the Implementation Order erroneously reported the Arrears Forgiveness amount at $. million (page ), but the correct amount is $0, as shown on Exhibit of the Company s September, 0 Implementation Plan. Central Hudson discussed this matter with Staff, following the issuance of the Implementation Order and prior to the Company submitting its final March 0 compliance tariff filing. Q. Does Central Hudson propose to institute an Arrears Forgiveness Program as part of the New Program? A. No. Central Hudson will continue, and eventually phase-out, the existing Arrears Forgiveness Program that is part of EPOP as we described and quantified above. Upon expiration of the EPOP Arrears Forgiveness Program, Central Hudson will not provide any Arrears Forgiveness programs. VI. RECONNECTION FEE WAIVER PROGRAM 0 Q. Please describe the Reconnection Fee Waiver Program offered by Central Hudson. A. Central Hudson offers a Reconnection Fee Waiver Program for low income customers that was originally established in the June, 0 Order Authorizing Acquisition Subject to Conditions ( Acquisition Order ) in Case -M-0. This program allows for a one time waiver of the reconnection fee (currently ranging from $0 to $0) for low income customers (defined as customers who have received HEAP in the last

Case -E- ; Case -G- twelve months) who have had their service terminated for non-payment. Central Hudson will continue to provide this Reconnection Fee Waiver program under the New Low Income Program. The forecasted costs for this program are set forth on Exhibit (LIP-). The forecasted cost for the Rate Year is $,000 based on the currently approved reconnection fees. VII. DEFERRAL OF LOW INCOME PROGRAM COSTS 0 Q. Does the Company currently have deferred accounting for the EPOP, Low Income Bill Discount Program and Reconnection Fee Waiver Program? A. Central Hudson currently has deferred accounting for EPOP, the Low Income Bill Discount Program, and the Reconnection Fee Waiver Program per the 0 Rate Plan. Q. Please address how the 0 Rate Plan handles the under-expenditures and over-expenditures for the EPOP, Low Income Bill Discount Program, and Reconnection Fee Waiver Program. A. The Company is authorized to carry forward under-expenditures for all three programs for use in subsequent years. For any over-expenditures, the EPOP deferral is limited to no more than % of the Rate Year funding level measured on a corporate basis; and 0% deferral of any overexpenditures associated with the Low Income Program and Reconnection Fee Waiver Program.

Case -E- ; Case -G- Q. What is the Company s proposal for deferral accounting for the EPOP Arrears Forgiveness component phase-out, New Low Income Program and the Reconnection Fee Waiver Program? A. Due to the uncertainties surrounding participation levels and the need to address Commission mandated funding limits described above, Central Hudson is proposing symmetrical deferred accounting for the costs associated with EPOP Arrears Forgiveness component phase-out, the New Low Income Program and the Reconnection Fee Waiver Program. The Company is proposing symmetrical deferral for 0% of any underexpenditures or over-expenditures for all of these programs. Any underexpenditures would be carried forward for use in the Low Income Programs in subsequent years and any over-expenditures would be deferred for future rate recovery from customers. Q. Does this conclude your direct testimony at this time? A. Yes, it does.