fi&fr fibf Policy Asset - Liabili Mana ement ALM llfre Qower of ldistifiution FTNANCTAL SERVTCES LrMtrED IAL

Similar documents
Guidelines for Asset Liability Management (ALM) System in Financial Institutions (FIs)

Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Limited Asset-Liability Management Policy

Risk Management - CAIIB

Asset-Liability Management in Banks

INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT IN KRISHNA GRAMEENA BANK

ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT IN BANKS A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON GAP ANALYSIS OF SCBs IN INDIA

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICY

ASSET- LIABILITY MANAGEMENT POLICY

OCCL S RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY

Market and Liquidity Risk Assessment Overview. Federal Reserve System

Draft Guidelines on Liquidity Risk Management and Basel III Framework on Liquidity Standards

UBS AG, Mumbai Branch (Scheduled Commercial Bank) (Incorporated in Switzerland with limited liability)

UBS AG, Mumbai Branch (Scheduled Commercial Bank) (Incorporated in Switzerland with limited liability)

Framework on Analysis of Balance Sheets

The Branch does not have any interest in insurance entities.

DISCLOSURES UNDER NEW CAPITAL ADEQUACY FRAMEWORK (BASEL II) FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 ST MARCH 2011

FUTURE BANK B.S.C. (c) PILLAR III QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES 31 DECEMBER 2013 RISK MANAGEMENT

JM FINANCIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS LIMITED (Formerly known as FICS Consultancy Services Limited) INTERNAL GUIDELINES ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

BASEL III INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED MUMBAI BRANCH

2. The details of changes made to the existing regulatory framework on Corporate Governance and Disclosures for NBFCs are given in Annexes 1-5.

MARKET DISCLOSURE FOR DEC 09 UNDER PILLAR-III OF BASEL II Risk Management Department The City Bank Limited

ASSET LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

B A S E L I I P I L L A R 3 D I S C L O S U R E S

PILLAR III DISCLOSURES

2. Statutory disclosures as per RBI Provisions and contingencies recognised in the Profit and Loss Account comprise of:

PILLAR III DISCLOSURES

FACOR ALLOYS LIMITED RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY

The Branch does not have any interest in insurance entities.

Report on Basel II - Pillar III Disclosure Requirements

MEGHNA BANK LIMITED HEAD OFFICE Disclosure per Basel II guidelines As on December 31, 2014

Guidance Note: Liquidity. January Ce document est aussi disponible en français.

JM Financial Capital Limited INTERNAL GUIDELINES ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MARCH 2017

COMMUNIQUE. Page 1 of 13

Liquidity Management For Security Dealers That Are Not Licensed Deposit Takers

Index. Managing Risks in Commercial and Retail Banking By Amalendu Ghosh Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte. Ltd.

China Construction Bank Corporation, Johannesburg Branch

Guidance Note: Stress Testing Credit Unions with Assets Greater than $500 million. May Ce document est également disponible en français.

CARE s Rating Methodology For Banks

Review of Regulatory Framework for the All India Financial Institutions (AIFIs)

Liquidity Risk Management in Select Private Sector Banks in India: A Gap Analysis Approach

Asset/Liability Management Series Session 1 Presenter: Sasha Khandoker ALM Analyst

Consultation paper on CEBS s Guidelines on Liquidity Cost Benefit Allocation

GUIDELINES FOR THE INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR LICENSEES

Risk Management. Credit Risk Management

Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosure CAPITAL SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED. Basel II - Pillar 3 Disclosures- September 2018

BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY BANKS AND DEPOSIT COMPANIES ACT 1999: PRINCIPLES FOR SOUND LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION

1. Scope of Application

REGULATORY GUIDELINE Liquidity Risk Management Principles TABLE OF CONTENTS. I. Introduction II. Purpose and Scope III. Principles...

MINDA INDUSTRIES LIMITED RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY

Policy Guideline of the Bank of Thailand Re: Liquidity Risk Management of Financial Institutions

Bridgewater Bank Regulatory Disclosures March 31, 2016

MANAPPURAM FINANCE LIMITED INVESTMENT POLICY. (As approved by Board at its meeting held on 12 th February, 2016)

Bridgewater Bank Regulatory Disclosures December 31, 2017

Standard Chartered Bank UAE Branches

Decision on liquidity risk management. General provisions Article 1

Bridgewater Bank Regulatory Disclosures March 31, 2017

PRINCIPLES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF INTEREST RATE RISK IN THE BANKING BOOK (IRRBB)

BAC BAHAMAS BANK LIMITED

PILLAR 3 Disclosures

Regulatory Disclosures March 31, 2018

Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosures ( )

A STUDY ON ASSET-LIABILITY MANAGEMENT IN ICICI BANK WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT

Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book. Taking a close look at the latest IRRBB developments

Advisory Guidelines of the Financial Supervision Authority. Requirements to the internal capital adequacy assessment process

RESERVE BANK OF MALAWI

Management of Interest Rate Risk in Indian Banking

BELSTAR INVESMENT AND FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED

LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT IN SBI AND ICICI

Asset Liability Management. Craig Roodt Australian Prudential Regulation Authority

Liquidity Risk Management in Islamic Banking. Prasanna Seshachellam July 2010

An Empirical Analysis and Comparative Study of Liquidity Ratios and Asset-Liability Management of Banks Operating in India

Basel III Pillar 3 Disclosures

Pillar III Disclosure

FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS & RATIO ANALYSIS

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

References have been made in this submission to Global practices as the Bank in India is operating as branch of the Global Bank.

PILLAR III DISCLOSURE UNDER BASEL-III FRAMEWORK FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 31 ST DECEMBER, 2013

SBI Canada Bank Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosures as of December 31, 2016

Pillar III Disclosures

Risk Management at ANZ

National Australia Bank Limited, Mumbai Branch (Incorporated in Australia with limited liability)

ANNUAL DISCLOSURES FOR 2010 ON AN UNCONSOLIDATED BASIS

CERTIFICATE COURSE ON FOREIGN EXCHANGE & TREASURY MANAGEMENT

Supersedes Previous Issue: Supervisory Circular No. 6 Liquidity Risk Management, June, 2004

Alpha Bank AD Skopje. Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2007

The major highlights of the Central Bank of Oman (CBO) regulations on capital adequacy are:

The major highlights of the Central Bank of Oman (CBO) regulations on capital adequacy are:

INTEREST RATE RISK MAKING YOUR MODEL UNDERSTANDABLE AND RELEVANT

LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT MODULE

Basel II Pillar 3 Disclosure CAPITAL SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED. Basel II - Pillar 3 Disclosures

Guidance on Liquidity Risk Management

THE INVESTOR FOR SECURITIES COMPANY. PILLAR III DISCLOSURE As of 31 December 2017

BOM/BSD 24/ July 2009 BANK OF MAURITIUS. Guideline on Measurement and Management of Market Risk

BELSTAR INVESMENT AND FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED

African Bank Holdings Limited and African Bank Limited. Annual Public Pillar III Disclosures

ICICI Bank UK PLC Pillar 3 disclosures for the year ended March 31, 2014

Merrill Lynch Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Company. Pillar 3 Disclosure. As at 31 December 2017

Georgia Banking School

Consolidated Citigroup U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosure. For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2018

POLICY ON RESOURCE PLANNING

Transcription:

fibf FTNANCTAL SERVTCES LrMtrED Asset - Liabili Mana ement ALM Policy r INANC THROUGH fi&fr IAL SERVI CES L llfre Qower of ldistifiution Approved at the Board Meeting held on 24th August, 2017.

&bf FTNANCTAL SERVTCES LTMTTED ALM POLICY (Based on Extractsfrom RBI Guidelines on ALMfor NBfCs) In the normal course, NBFCs are exposed to credit and market risks in view of the assetliability transformation. With liberalisation in Indian financial markets over the last few years and growing integration of domestic markets with external markets and entry of MNCs for meeting the credit needs of not only the corporates but also the retail segments, the risks associated with NBFCs' operations have become complex and large, requiring strategic management. NBFCs are now operating in a fairly deregulated environment and are required to determine on their own, interest rates on deposits, subject to the ceiling of maximum rate of interest on deposits they can offer on deposits prescribed by the Bank; and advances on a dynamic basis. The interest rates on investments of NBFCs in government and other securities are also now market related. 1. Intense competition for business involving both the assets and liabilities has brought pressure on the management of NBFCs to maintain a good balance among spreads, profitability and long term viability. Imprudent liquidity management can put NBFCs' earnings and reputation at great risk. These pressures call for structured and comprehensive measures and not jwt ad hoc action. The managements of NBFCs have to base their business decisions on a dynamic and integrated risk management system and process, driven by corporate strategy. NBFCs are exposed to several major risks in the course of their business - credit risk, interest rate risk, equity/commodity price risk, liquidity risk and operational risk. It is, therefore, important that NBFCs introduce effective risk management systems that address the issues relating to interest rate and liquidity risks. 2. NBFCS need to address these risks in a structured manner by upgrading their risk management and adopting more comprehensive Asset-Liability Management (ALM) practices than has been done hitherto. ALM, among other functions, is also concerned with risk management and provides a comprehensive and dynamic framework for measuring, monitoring and managing liquidity and interest rate equity and commodity price risks of major operators in the financial system that needs to be closely integrated with the NBFCs' business strategy. It involves assessment of various types of risks and altering the assetliability portfolio in a dynamic way in order to manage risks. 3. Having understood the significance of sound ALM practices MAS Financial Services Limited (MAS) proposed to lays down broad guidelines in respect of interest rate and liquidity risks management systems in company, which form part of the Asset-Liability Management (ALM) function. The initial focus of the ALM function would be to enforce the risk management discipline i.e. managing business after assessing the risks involved. The objective of good risk management systems should be that these systems will evolve into a strategic tool for MAS's management. 4. The ALM process rests on three pillars: o ALM Information Systems Management Information Systems M

information availability, accuracy, adequacy and expediency o ALM Organisation Structure and responsibilities Level of top management involvement o ALM Process Risk parameters Risk identification Risk measurement Risk management Risk policies and tolerance levels. 5. ALM Information Systems 5.1 ALM has to be supported by a management philosophy which clearly specifies the risk policies and tolerance limits. This framework needs to be built on sound methodology with necessary information system as back up. Thus, information is the key to the ALM process. There are various methods prevalent world-wide for measuring risks. These range from the simple Gap Statement to extremely sophisticate and data intensive Risk Adjusted Profitability Measurement methods. However, though the central element for the entire ALM exercise is the availability of adequate and accurate information with expedience; and the systems existing. Adequate measures are to be taken to collect accurate data in a timely manner through full scale computerisation. 6. ALM Organisation 6.1 a) Successful implementation of the risk management process would require strong commitment on the part of the senior management in the company, to integrate basic operations and strategic decision making with risk management. The Board of Directors lead by Chairman and Managing Director will have overall responsibility for management of risks and should decide the risk management policy of the NBFC and set limits for liquidity, interest rate and equity price risks. b) The Asset - Liability Committee (ALCO) consisting of following members should be responsible for ensuring adherence to the limits set by the Board as well as for deciding the business strategy of the company (on the assets and liabilities sides) in line with the company's budget and decided risk management objectives. 1. Shd Kamlesh Gandhi - Chairman & Managing Director (CMD) 2. Shd Mukesh Gandhi - Director (Finance) 3. Smt. Darshana Pandya - Chief Operating Officer (COO) c) The ALM Support Groups consisting of operating staff should be responsible for analysing, monitoring and reporting the risk profiles to the ALCO. The staff should also prepare forecasts (simulations) showing the effects of various possible changes in market conditions related to the balance sheet and recommend the action needed to adhere to Company's internal limits. q

6.2 The ALCO is a decision making unit responsible for balance sheet planning from risk return perspective including the strategic management of interest rate and liquidity risks. The business and risk management strategy of the company will ensure that the company operates within the limits I parameters set by the Board. The business issues that an ALCO would consider, inter alia, will include product pricing for both deposits and advances, desired maturity profile and mix of the incremental assets and liabilities, prevailing interest rates offered by other peer NBFCs for the similar services/product, etc. In addition to monitoring the risk levels of the company, the ALCO should review the results of and progress in implementation of the decisions made in the previous meetings. The ALCO would also articulate the current interest rate view of the company and base its decisions for future business strategy on this view. In respect of the funding policy, for instance, its responsibility would be to decide on source and mix of liabilities or sale of assets. Towards this end, it will have to develop a view on future direction of interest rate movements and decide on funding mixes between fixed vs floating rate funds, wholesale vs retail deposits, money market vs capital market funding, domestic vs foreign currency funding, etc. The frequency of holding their ALCO meetings will be bi-monthly. However, if the need be for a meeting at a short notice, the ALCO meet at a shorter notice. 6.3 Board of Directors Meetings and Review The Board of Directors, in their board meetings, will oversee the implementation of the system and review its functioning periodically. 6.4 ALM Process: The scope of ALM function can be described as follows: o Liquidity risk management o Management of market risks o Funding and capital planning o Profit planning and growth projection o Forecasting and analysing'what if scenario'and preparation of contingency plans The guidelines given in this note mainly address Liquidity and Interest Rate risks. 7. Liquidity Risk Management 7.1 Measuring and managing liquidity needs are vital for effective operation of company. The importance of liquidity transcends individual institutions, as liquidity shortfall in one institution can have repercussions on the entire system. ALCO should measure not only the liquidity positions of company on an ongoing basis but also examine how liquidity requirements are likely to evolve under different assumptions. Experience shows that assets commonly considered as liquid, like Government securities and other money market instruments, could also become illiquid when the market and players are unidirectional. Therefore, liquidity has to be tracked through maturity or cash flow mismatches. For measuring and managing net funding requirements, the use of a maturity ladder and calculation of cumulative surplus or deficit of funds at selected maturity dates is adopted as a standard tool. The format of the Statement of Structural Liquidity as prescribed by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) may be used for this purpose. 7.2 The Maturity Profile based on ALM - II could be used for measuring the future cash flows of company in different time buckets. The time buckets, may be distributed as under: w

i) i day to 30/31 days (One month) ii) Over one month and up to 2 months iii) Over two months and up to 3 months iv) Over 3 months and up to 6 months v) Over 6 months and up to I year vi) Over 1 year and up to 3 years vii) Over 3 years and up to 5 years viii) Over 5 years As MAS does not hold public deposits, all the investment securities would fall in the category of 'non-mandatory securities'. All non-mandatory securities may be kept in buckets of future time frame for the purpose of determining their cash flows based on maturity of such security and intention of holding such security till the time of such maturity. 7.3 Alternatively, the company may also follow the concept of Trading Book which is as follows: i) The composition and volume are clearly defined; ii) Maximum maturity/duration of the portfolio is restricted; iii) The holding period not to exceed 90 days; iv) Cut-loss limit prescribed; v) Defeasance periods (product-wise) i.e. time taken to liquidate the position on the basis of Liquidity in the secondary market is prescribed; When company proposed to maintain such 'Trading Books' and complying with the above standards may show the trading securities under "1 day to 30/31 days (One month)", Over one month and up to 2 months" and "Over two months and up to 3 months" buckets on the basis of the defeasance periods. The Board/ALCO of the company should approve the volume, composition, holding/defeasance period, cut loss, etc. of the 'Trading Book'. The remaining investments should also be classified as short term and long term investments as required under Prudential Norms. 7.4 The policy note recorded by the company on treatment of the investment portfolio for the purpose of ALM and approved by their Board/ALCO should be forwarded to the Regional Office of the Department of Non-Banking Supervision of RBI under whose jurisdiction the registered office of the company is located. 7.5 Within each time bucket, there could be mismatches depending on cash inflows and outflows. While the mismatches up to one year would be relevant since these provide early warning signals of impending liquidity problems, the main focus should be on the short-term mismatches viz., 1-30131 days. Company, however, is expected to monitor its cumulative mismatches (running total) across all time buckets by establishing internal prudential limits with the approval of the ALCO. The mismatches (negative gap) during l- 30131 days in normal course may not exceed 15% of the cash outflows in this time bucket. 7.6 The Statement of Structural Liquidity shall be prepared by placing all cash inflows and outflows in the maturity ladder according to the expected timing of cash flows. A maturing q

liability will be a cash outflow while a maturing asset will be a cash inflow. While determining the likely cash inflows / outflows, company will have to make a number of assumptions according to their asset - liability profiles. While determining the tolerance levels, the company may take into account all relevant factors based on their assetliability base, nature ofbusiness, future strategy, etc. 7.7 ln order to enable the company to monitor their short-term liquidity on a dynamic basis over a time horizon spanning from 1 day to 6 months, company will estimate their short-term liquidity profiles on the basis of business projections and other commitments for planning purposes. An indicative format ALM - I issued by RBI for estimating Short-term Dynamic Liquidity will be used for the said purpose. 8. Currency Risk The company does not have any currency risk as of now as there are no transactions entered by the company which will involve curency risk. However, in future, if such transactions are entered into, the company will take appropriate steps to modifu this policy and incorporate measures to check currency risk. 9. Interest Rate Risk (IRR) 9.1 The operational flexibility given to NBFCs in pricing most of the assets and liabilities imply the need for the financial system to hedge the Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is the risk where changes in market interest rates might adversely affect an NBFC's financial condition. The changes in interest rates affect company in some way. The immediate impact of changes in interest rates is on company's earnings (i.e. reported profits) by changing its Net Interest Income (NII). As such MAS is majorly into funding of loans which are always fixed rate loans. The loans borrowed from banks are mostly at floating rates. The company manages this risk on NII by pricing its loan products to customers at a rate which covers interest rate risk. The risk from the earnings perspective can be measured as changes in the Net Interest Income (NII) or Net Interest Margin (NIM). Measurement of such risk is done at the time of deciding rates to be offered to customers. Once interest rate risk is measured by the ALCO, lending rates of the new loans are frnalized accordingly. The interest sensitive assets and liabilities will be clubbed into the following buckets for ascertaining the Gap in individual buckets and the cumulative Gap. i) 1 day to 14 days ii) 14 days to 1 month iii) Over 1 month to 2 months iv) Over 2 months to 3 months v) Over 3 months to 6 months vi) Over 6 months to 1 year vii) Over 1 year to 3 years viii) Over 3 to 5 years ix) Over 5 years The Reporting Format ALM-3 will be used for computing the Gaps in each time bucket. Within each time bucket, there could be mismatches depending on interest rate sensitive cash inflows and outflows. If at any time a negative Gap were to arise ALCO will ensure that such Gap, individual as well as cumulative, do not exceed 50ol0. UqP