Economic order quantity = 90000= 300. The number of orders per year

Similar documents
Simulation. LEARNING OBJECTIVES : After studying this chapter, you should be able to :

Decision Making. D.K.Sharma

Causes of Poor Decisions

Decision Making. DKSharma

Master of Business Administration - General. Cohort: MBAG/14/PT Mar. Examinations for Semester II / 2014 Semester I

Performance Pillar. P1 Performance Operations. 24 November 2010 Wednesday Morning Session

MgtOp 470 Business Modeling with Spreadsheets Washington State University Sample Final Exam

- Economic Climate Country Decline Stable Improve South Korea Philippines Mexico

Examinations for Semester II. / 2011 Semester I

The May 2012 examination produced the highest pass rate so far achieved on the P1, Performance Operations paper within the Russian Diploma at 78%.

BSc (Hons) Software Engineering BSc (Hons) Computer Science with Network Security

Chapter 18 Student Lecture Notes 18-1

PTP_Final_Syllabus 2008_Jun 2014_Set 3

Babu Banarasi Das National Institute of Technology and Management

Module 15 July 28, 2014

MBA 7020 Sample Final Exam

SIMULATION CHAPTER 15. Basic Concepts

Performance Pillar. P1 Performance Operations. Wednesday 31 August 2011

UNIT 5 DECISION MAKING

System Simulation Chapter 2: Simulation Examples

SUGGESTED SOLUTION CA FINAL

Performance Pillar. P1 Performance Operations. 25 May 2011 Wednesday Morning Session

Sensitivity = NPV / PV of key input

1.The 6 steps of the decision process are:

Subject : Computer Science. Paper: Machine Learning. Module: Decision Theory and Bayesian Decision Theory. Module No: CS/ML/10.

Performance Pillar. P1 Performance Operations. Wednesday 1 September 2010

Decision Analysis under Uncertainty. Christopher Grigoriou Executive MBA/HEC Lausanne

Chapter 13 Decision Analysis

Activity Predecessors Durations (days) a - 3 b a 4 c a 5 d a 4 e b 2 f d 9 g c, e 6 h f, g 2

Decision Making Supplement A

DO NOT OPEN THIS QUESTION PAPER UNTIL YOU ARE TOLD TO DO SO. Performance Pillar. P1 Performance Operations. Wednesday 27 August 2014

Decision Analysis. Introduction. Job Counseling

NODIA AND COMPANY. GATE SOLVED PAPER Mechanical Engineering Industrial Engineering. Copyright By NODIA & COMPANY

DO NOT OPEN THIS QUESTION PAPER UNTIL YOU ARE TOLD TO DO SO. Performance Pillar. P1 Performance Operations. Tuesday 28 February 2012

SOLUTION QUANTITATIVE TOOLS IN MANAGEMENT MAY (x) 5000 ( ) ( )

SCHOOL OF ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS BSc. (APPLIED ACCOUNTING) GENERAL / SPECIAL DEGREE PROGRAMME END SEMESTER EXAMINATION JULY 2016

A B C D E F 1 PAYOFF TABLE 2. States of Nature

Decision making in the presence of uncertainty

Chapter Seven Lecture Notes Managing Short-Term Resources and Obligations

Decision-making under conditions of risk and uncertainty

UNIT 10 DECISION MAKING PROCESS

Operations Management I Fall 2001 Faculty of Business Administration University of Windsor

(AA22) COST ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING

(AA22) COST ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING

PAPER 5 : COST MANAGEMENT Answer all questions.

Dr. Abdallah Abdallah Fall Term 2014

Decision Theory Using Probabilities, MV, EMV, EVPI and Other Techniques

PAPER 8- COST ACCOUNTING

Full file at CHAPTER 3 Decision Analysis

P1 Performance Operations

Lesson Plan for Simulation with Spreadsheets (8/31/11 & 9/7/11)

CA Final Gr. II Paper - 5 (Solution of November ) Paper - 5 : Advance Management Accounting

The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Commerce Quantitative Analysis - Prof. Dr. Samir Safi Midterm #1-15/3/2015. Name

DO NOT OPEN THIS QUESTION PAPER UNTIL YOU ARE TOLD TO DO SO. Performance Pillar. P1 Performance Operations. 21 November 2012 Wednesday Morning Session

MATH 425: BINOMIAL TREES

DECISION MAKING. Decision making under conditions of uncertainty

Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH(IT)/SEM-5/M(CS)-511/ OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES

Decision Analysis CHAPTER 19 LEARNING OBJECTIVES

(AA32) MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE

Chapter 3. Decision Analysis. Learning Objectives

(AA32) MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE

Exam 1 Review Problems

TUFTS UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING ES 152 ENGINEERING SYSTEMS Spring Lesson 16 Introduction to Game Theory

SUGGESTED SOLUTION INTERMEDIATE M 19 EXAM

PTP_Final_Syllabus 2012_Jun2015_Set 1

MOCK TEST PAPER INTERMEDIATE (IPC): GROUP I PAPER 3: COST ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Learning Objectives = = where X i is the i t h outcome of a decision, p i is the probability of the i t h

EXPECTED MONETARY VALUES ELEMENTS OF A DECISION ANALYSIS QMBU301 FALL 2012 DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY

Elements of Decision Theory

MOCK TEST PAPER INTERMEDIATE (IPC): GROUP I PAPER 3: COST ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

19 Decision Making. Expected Monetary Value Expected Opportunity Loss Return-to-Risk Ratio Decision Making with Sample Information

stake and attain maximum profitability. Therefore, it s judicious to employ the best practices in

Paper F5 ANSWERS TO EXAMPLES

P1: PBU/OVY P2: PBU/OVY QC: PBU/OVY T1: PBU GTBL GTBL032-Black-v13 January 22, :43

56:171 Operations Research Midterm Examination Solutions PART ONE

CS188 Spring 2012 Section 4: Games

Decision Analysis CHAPTER 19

9. Global Supply Chains and Decision Analysis. BIA Supply Chain Analytics

(AA22) COST ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING

Agenda. Lecture 2. Decision Analysis. Key Characteristics. Terminology. Structuring Decision Problems

Uniform Probability Distribution. Continuous Random Variables &

M G T 2251 Management Science. Exam 3

Valuation of Asian Option. Qi An Jingjing Guo

(AA22) COST ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING

Chapter 6 Continuous Probability Distributions. Learning objectives

MATERIALS COST CHAPTER2 PRACTICAL PROBLEMS

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT. BF360 Operations Research

Download Latest Papers:

Decision making in the presence of uncertainty

Energy and public Policies

Chapter 2 supplement. Decision Analysis

Production Management Winter 2002 Odette School of Business University of Windsor. Midterm Exam 2 Solution Tuesday, March 26, 7:00 9:00 pm

Decision Making. BUS 735: Business Decision Making and Research. exercises. Assess what we have learned. 2 Decision Making Without Probabilities

Historical information collected from a research in relation to sales of a company are as follows. Year Cost of promotion Sales revenue

Using the Maximin Principle

Inventory Control Subject to Uncertain Demand Solutions To Problems From Chapter 5

Decision Analysis CHAPTER LEARNING OBJECTIVES CHAPTER OUTLINE. After completing this chapter, students will be able to:

Suggested Answer_Syl12_Dec2017_Paper 8 INTERMEDIATE EXAMINATION

Answer to MTP_Intermediate_Syllabus 2008_Jun2014_Set 1

DO NOT OPEN THIS QUESTION PAPER UNTIL YOU ARE TOLD TO DO SO. Performance Pillar. P1 Performance Operations. 21 May 2014 Wednesday Morning Session

Transcription:

Inventory Model 1. Alpha industry needs 5400 units per year of a bought out component which will be used in its main product. The ordering cost is Rs. 250 per order and the carrying cost per unit per year is Rs. 30. Find the economic order quantity and the number of orders per year. Demand D = 5400 units/year Ordering cost C 0 = Rs. 250/order Carrying cost C c = Rs. 30 per unit/year Economic order quantity EOQ = Q = 2C 0D C C = 2 250 5400 30 = 90000= 300 The number of orders per year = D Q = 5400 = 18 orders/year 300 2. The demand for an item in a company is 18000 units per year. The company can produce the items at a rate of 3000 units per month. The cost of one set-up is Rs. 500 and the holding cost of 1 unit per month is Rs. 0.15. The shortage cost of one unit is Rs. 20 per year. Determine the optimum manufacturing quantity and the number of shortages. Also determine the manufacturing time and the time between set-ups. Demand r = 18000 units/year Production rate k = 3000 units/mont = 3000 12 = units/year Cost per set-up C 0 = Rs. 500 Holding cost C c = Rs. 0.15 per unit/mont = 0.15 12 = per unit/year Shortage cost C s = Rs. 20 per unit/year The optimum manufacturing quantity EBQ = Q = 2C 0 C C kr k r C c + C s C s = 2(500) 18000 18000 + 20 (20) = 2(500) 18000 18000 2 (20) = 21800000 4669 Q 1 = 2C 0 r k r C c k C s = 2 500 C c + C s 18000 18000 20 + 20 = 2(500) 18000 18000 20 (2) = 4587155.963 2142 Q 2 = 2C 0 r k r C s k C c = 2 500 C c + C s 20 18000 18000 + 20 1

= The number of shortages Manufacturing time The time between set-ups 2(500) 20 18000 18000 (2) = r Q = 18000 93 units 2 193 = Q k = 4669 = 0.1297 year t = Q r = 4669 = 0.2594 year 18000 = 37155.9633 193 3. The annual demand for a product is 100000 units. The rate of production is 200000 units per year. The set-up cost per production run is Rs. 5000 and the variable production cost of each item is Rs. 10. The annual holding cost per unit is 20% of its value. Find the optimum production lot size and the length of the production run. Demand r = 100000 units/year Production rate k = 200000 units/year Cost per set-up C 0 = Rs. 5000 Production cost P = Rs. 10/unit Holding cost C c = 20% of P = 0.2 10 = 2 per unit/year Optimum production lot size EBQ = Q = 2C 0 C C kr k r = 2(5000) 2 200000 100000 200000 100000 Length of the production run = 1000000000 31623 units t = Q r = 31623 = 0.3162 year 100000 Decision under Uncertainty 1. A retail store desires to determine the optimal daily order size for a perishable item. The store buys the perishable item at the rate of Rs. 80 per kg. and sells at the rate of Rs. 100 per kg. If the order size in more than the demand, the excess quantity can be sold at Rs. 70 per kg in a secondary market; otherwise, the opportunity cost for the store is Rs. 15 experience, it is found that the demand varies from 50 kg to 250 kg in steps of 50 kg. The possible values of the order size from 75 kg to 300 kg in steps of 75 kg. Determine the optimal order size which will maximize the daily profit of the store. Purchase price of the perishable item = Rs. 80/kg 2

Selling price of the perishable item in the primary market = Rs. 100/kg Selling price of the perishable item in the secondary market = Rs. 70/kg Profit in the primary market P 1 = 100 80 = Rs. 20/kg Profit in the secondary market P 2 = 70 80 = Rs. 10/kg Opportunity cost of not meeting the demand OC = Rs. 15/kg Net Profit = D j P 1 + Q i D j P 2, if Q i D j Q i P 1 D j Q i OC, if D, > Q i D j 20 Q i D j 10, if Q i D j Net Profit = Q i 20 D j Q i 15, if D, > Q i Where Q i is the ith order size and D j is the demand of Jth future state. The corresponding outcomes daily net profits are summarized below. Order size Q i 75 150 225 300 Demand D J 50 100 150 200 250 50 20 75 50 10 = 750 50 20 150 50 10 = 0 50 20 225 50 10 = 750 50 20 300 50 10 = 1500 75 20 100 75 15 = 1125 100 20 150 100 10 = 1500 100 20 225 100 10 = 750 100 20 300 100 10 = 0 75 20 150 75 15 = 375 150 20 150 150 10 = 3000 150 20 225 150 10 = 2250 150 20 300 150 10 = 1500 75 20 200 75 15 = 375 150 20 200 150 15 = 2250 200 20 225 200 10 = 3750 200 20 300 200 10 = 3000 The expected daily net profit with respect to each order size is computed as below: 75 20 250 75 15 = 1125 150 20 250 150 15 = 1500 225 20 250 225 15 = 4125 250 20 300 250 10 = 4500 E Q 1 = 1 5 E Q 2 = 1 5 750+ 1125+ 375 375 1125 = 150 0 + 1500+ 3000+ 2250+ 1500 = 1650 E Q 3 = 1 5 750+ 750 + 2250+ 3750+ 4125 = 2025 E Q 4 = 1 1500+ 0 + 1500+ 3000+ 4500 = 1500 5 By Laplacian criterion, the expected daily net profit is maximum when the order size is 225 kg. So the store should place an order of 225 kg of the perishable item, daily. 2. The president of a large oil company must decide how to invest the company s Rs. 10 million of excess profits. He could invest the entire sum in solar energy research or he could use the money to research better ways of processing coal so that it will burn more cleanly. His only other option is to put half of this R and D money into solar research and half into coal research. The president estimates 1000 percent return on investment if the solar research is successful and a 500 percent return if the coal research is successful. (i) Construct a payoff table for the president s R and D investment problem. (ii) Based on the maximin criterion, what decision should president make? (iii) Based on the minimax regret criterion, what decision should the president make? s 1 = neither coal nor solar research is successful s 2 = Solar research is successful and coal research is not. s 3 = Coal research is successful and solar research is not 3

s 4 = both coal and solar research are successful. d! = invest in solar R and D only d 2 = invest in coal R and D only d 3 = invest 50% in coal and 50% in solar R and D The payoff table for the president s R and D investment problem is given below d 1 d 2 d 3 s 1-10 -10-10 s 2 10 1000 100 = 100-10 10 50 100 1000 100 10 50 100 = 45 s 3-10 10 500 = 50 100 50 50 10 + 10 100 100 500 100 = 20 s 4 10 1000 = 100 100 500 10 = 50 100 50 10 100 1000 50 + 10 100 100 500 100 = 75 Maximin criterion: d 1 d 2 d 3 s 1-10 -10-10 s 2 100-10 45 s 3-10 50 20 s 4 100 50 75 Min - 10-10 -10 Maximin = 10 Million The president can invest in any one of the following research solar R and D only or coal R and D only or 50% in coal and 50% in solar R and D. Minimax regret criterion: d 1 d 2 d 3 s 1 0 0 0 s 2 0 110 55 s 3 60 0 30 s 4 0 50 25 Max 60 110 55 4

Minimax regret= 55 Million The president can invest half of this R and D money into solar research and half into coal research. Decision under Risk 1. A manager has a choice between (i) A risky contract promising Rs. 7 lakhs with probability 0.6 and Rs. 4 lakhs with probability 0.4 and (ii) A diversified portfolio consisting of two contracts with independent outcomes each promising Rs. 3.5 lakhs with probability 0.6 and Rs. 2 lakhs with probability 0.4. Using the EMV criteria suggest a contract. Risky contract Diversified portfolio Revenue R ij Probability(P ij ) P ij R ij Revenue R ij Probability(P ij ) P ij R ij 700000 0.6 420000 350000 0.6 210000 400000 0.4 160000 200000 0.4 80000 Total 1 580000 Total 1 290000 The expected Revenue ER i = j j P j R j P j, ER 1 = 580000 1 = 580000, ER 2 = 290000 = 290000 1 Here the expected revenue of a risky contract is more than the expected revenue of diversified portfolio. Therefore the manager suggests a risky contract. Decision tree 1. Amar company is currently working with a process which after paying for materials, labour etc., brings a profit of Rs. 12,000. The following alternatives are made available to the company: (i) The company can conduct research (R 1 ) which is expected to cost Rs. 10,000 having 90% chances of success. If it proves a success the company gets a gross income of Rs. 25,000. (ii) The company can conduct research (R 2 ) which is expected to cost Rs. 8,000 having a probability of 60% success, the gross income will be Rs. 25,000. (iii) The company continues the current process. Because of limited resources, it is assumed that only one of the two types of research can be carried out a time. Use decision tree analysis to locate the optimal strategy for the company. EMV of decision node 4 = Max. = EMV of decision node 5 = Max. = EMV of chance node C= Rs. 0.4 12000+ 0.6 25000 = Rs. 19800 EMV of chance node D= Rs. 0.1 12000+ 0.9 25000 = Rs. 23700 EMV of decision node 2 = Max., 19800 8000 = EMV of decision node 3 = Max., 23700 10000 = Rs. 13700 EMV of chance node A = Rs. 0.9 25000+ 0.1 12000 = Rs. 23700 EMV of chance node B = Rs. 0.6 25000+ 0.4 13700 = Rs. 20480 5

Rs. 25000 - Rs. 10000 A 0.9 0.1 2 1 R 1 - Rs. 8000 R 2 C 0.4 4 R 2 0.6 Rs. 25000 Rs. 25000 - Rs. 8000 B 0.6 0.4 3 - Rs. 10000 R 1 D 0.1 5 0.9 Rs. 25000 EMV of decision node 1 = Max. Rs. 23700 10000, 12000, 20480 8000 = Rs. 137000 Thus the company can conduct research R 1 to earn maximum expected profit of Rs. 13,700. Simulation 1. A baker has to supply 200 pizzas every day to their outlet situated in city bazzar. The productions of pizzas vary due to availability of raw materials and labour for which probability distribution of production by observation made is as follows: Production per day 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 Probability 0.06 0.09 0.10 0.16 0.20 0.21 0.08 0.07 0.03 Simulate and find the average number of pizzas produced more than the requirement and average number of shortage of pizzas supplied to the outlet. Use the random number 97, 02, 80, 66, 96, 55, 50, 29, and 58 for this problem. 6

Production per day Probability Cumulative Probability Random number interval 196 0.06 0.06 0 5 197 0.09 0.15 6 14 198 0.10 0.25 15 24 199 0.16 0.41 25 40 200 0.20 0.61 41 60 201 0.21 0.82 61 81 202 0.08 0.90 82 89 203 0.07 0.97 90 96 204 0.03 1 97 99 Day Random Number Production per day Pizzas produced more than the requirement Shortage of pizzas supplied to the outlet 1 97 204 4-2 2 196-4 3 80 201 1-4 66 201 1-5 96 203 3-6 55 200 - - 7 50 200 - - 8 29 199-1 9 58 200 - - Total 9 5 Te average number of pizzas produced more tan te requirement = 9 = 1 per day 9 Te average number of Sortage of pizzas supplied to te outlet = 5/9 = 0.56 per day 2. In a plant expected to manufacture 100 cars per day, deviations occur due to a variety of reasons. The probabilities associated with the number of production units per day have been determined using past data Production per day 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 Probability 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.07 0.05 0.03 The ship carrying the cars can accommodate up to 101 cars per day. Using the random 97, 2, 80, 66, 96, 55, 50, 29, 58, 51, 4, 86, 24, 39, 47 simulate the production run for a period of 15 day. Also determine the average number of cars waiting to be shipped and average number of empty spaces in the ship. 7

Production per day Probability Cumulative Probability Random number interval 95 0.03 0.03 0 2 96 0.05 0.08 3 7 97 0.07 0.15 8 14 98 0.1 0.25 15 24 99 0.15 0.40 25 39 100 0.2 0.60 40 59 101 0.15 0.75 60 74 102 0.1 0.85 75 84 103 0.07 0.92 85 91 104 0.05 0.97 92 96 105 0.03 1 97 99 Day Random Number Production per day Cars waiting to be shipped Empty spaces in the ship 1 97 105 4-2 2 95-2 3 80 102 1-4 66 101 1-5 96 104 4-6 55 100 3-7 50 100 2-8 29 99 - - 9 58 100-1 10 51 100-1 11 4 96-5 12 86 103 2-13 24 98-1 14 39 99-2 15 47 100-1 Total 17 13 The average number of cars waiting to be shipped = 17 = 1.13 per day 15 The average number of empty spaces in the ship = 13 = 0.87 per day 15 3. A dentist schedules all his patients for 30 minute appointments. The following summary shows the various categories of work, their probability and time actually needed to complete the work. Category of service Filling Crown Cleaning Extract Checkup Time required(minutes) 45 60 15 45 15 Probability 0.4 0.15 0.15 0.1 0.2 8

Simulate the dentist s clinic for four hours and determine the average waiting time for the patients as well as the idleness of the doctor. Assume that all the patients show up at the clinic at exactly their scheduled arrival times, starting at 8 A.M. Use the following random numbers 40, 82, 11, 34, 25, 66, 17 and 79. Category Time (Minutes) Probability Cumulative Probability Random number interval Filling 45 0.40 0.40 0 39 Crown 60 0.15 0.55 40 54 Cleaning 15 0.15 0.70 55 69 Extraction 45 0.10 0.80 70 79 Checkup 15 0.20 1 80 99 Patient no. Random no. Arrival time Dentist s treatment starts Ends Waiting time on the part of patient(minutes) Idle time for the dentist 1 40 8.00 8.00 9.00 - - 2 82 8.30 9.00 9.15 30-3 11 9.00 9.15 10.00 15-4 34 9.30 10.00 10.45 30-5 25 10.00 10.45 11.30 45-6 66 10.30 11.30 11.45 60-7 17 11.00 11.45 12.30 45-8 79 11.30 12.30 1.15 60 - Total 285 0 Average waiting time for the patients = 285 = 35.625 minutes 8 Average idleness of the dentist = Nil 9