Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 4 Focus. May 2015 San Francisco, California

Similar documents
Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. July 2015 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 3 Focus. June 2014 San Francisco, California

Draft SFMTA Strategic Plan 11/14/2011, San Francisco California

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 3 Focus. November 2016 San Francisco, California

Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets

SFMTA Board Presentation January 16, 2018

Final Report June 1, 2012 San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) 2012 Budget Balancing Panel

METRO. Fiscal Year 2014 Monthly Board Report. May 2014

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

METRO. Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report. September 2012 (Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

SFMTA 2013 Revenue Bond Board of Directors

METRO. Fiscal Year 2015 Monthly Board Report. February 2015

METRO. Monthly Board Report. June 2006

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. December 2012 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. November 2012

METRO MONTHLY BOARD REPORT

METRO. Fiscal Year 2012 Monthly Board Report. December 2011 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

METRO. Fiscal Year 2013 Monthly Board Report. January 2013

Business & Financial Services December 2017

METRO. Fiscal Year 2017 Monthly Performance Report. Revenue Expense Ridership Performance. October 2016

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at September 2017 compared to September 2016.

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at March 2017 compared to March 2016.

Review of Membership Developments

Performance Management Accountability Meeting Data as of October, 2012

The year to date is less than budget and prior year by 15.4 million and 11.6 million, respectively.

METRO. Fiscal Year Monthly Performance Report. Revenue Expense Ridership Performance. February 2018 (First Quarter Fiscal Year-to Date)

METRO. Fiscal Year Monthly Performance Report. Revenue Expense Ridership Performance. November 2018 (Third Quarter Fiscal Year-to Date)

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at December 2017 compared to December 2016.

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at February 2017 compared to February 2016.

FY 2013 and FY 2014 Proposed Operating Budget An Investment in Maintenance. April 3, 2012 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

METRO. Fiscal Year Monthly Performance Report. Revenue Expense Ridership Performance. May 2018 (Second Quarter Fiscal Year-to Date)

METRO. Fiscal Year 2015 Monthly Board Report. September 2015 (Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year-to-Date)

OPERATING BUDGET FY Actual Results (Unaudited) October 20, 2009 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

FY 2011 and FY 2012 Operating Budget APRIL 6, 2010 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

PROPOSED FY 2015 & 2016 OPERATING BUDGET & CAPITAL BUDGET PROPOSED FY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at July 2016 compared to July 2015.

Budget Process Overview and Cost Allocation Methodology

Fiscal Year 2018 Project 1 Annual Budget

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MARCH 21 AT 4 PM

GENERAL FUND AT A GLANCE Category Budget YTD Actual % % Year Passed Resources 8.33% Uses 8.33% $0 $1,330,750

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Research Accounting & Analysis University of Washington

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at August 2018 compared to August 2017.


Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at January 2018 compared to January 2017.

ALAMEDA County Transportation Commission. Alameda County Transportation Commission GUARANTEED RIDE HOME PROGRAM GUIDELINES

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

GENERAL FUND AT A GLANCE Category Budget YTD Actual % % Year Passed Resources 50.00% Uses 50.00% $0 $1,928,600

Egg Entrepreneurship Records

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at June 2018 compared to June 2017.

FY 2013 and FY 2014 Preliminary Operating Budget (As of mid February 2012) February 21, 2012 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

Determination (9 /2010) of a Customer Complaint Submitted by a Customer Against Muscat Electricity Distribution Company SAOC

$180 $160 $140 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $ Single Fam -New Apts -New

Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) Waiver Monthly Surplus-Deficit Report for Waiver Program Expenditures. June 20, 2016

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

Executive Summary. July 17, 2015

THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 14 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Finance and Information Technology BRIEF

Interviews with 1,019 adult Americans, conducted by telephone by Opinion Research Corporation on March 12-15, The margin of sampling error for

PAYROLL STANDARDIZATION. Transitioning from Monthly to Biweekly Pay on January 1, 2019

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Operating Budget. Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006)

Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

Big Walnut Local School District

Financial & Business Highlights For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

Key Milestones & Decisions

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

Research Accounting & Analysis Grant & Contract Accounting? Management Accounting & Analysis

Parking Cash Out. Transportation Solutions Workshop Series April 19, 2017

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of July 31

HIPIOWA - IOWA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION Unaudited Balance Sheet As of January 31

WESTWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH Summary Financial Statement YEAR TO DATE - February 28, Over(Under) Budget WECC Fund Actual Budget

Earned Value Management An Overview March 2014

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report November 2018

YTD REVENUE to EXPENDITURES and BUDGET COMPARISON (In Millions) $39.992

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT December 31, 2017

VIIl. Agency Financial Plans and 12-Month Allocations

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at March 2018 compared to March 2017.

CITY OF RICHMOND MONTHLY FINANCE REPORT AS OF APRIL 30, 2017

MANAGING FOR RESULTS: An Implementation Plan for the City of Portland

FY2014 Operating Budget Performance Report

HOME Survey. Housing Opportunities and Market Experience. March National Association of REALTORS Research Department

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

Savings Index maintains momentum in January

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report September 2017

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report December 2017

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report December 2016

Using projections to manage your programs

MEDICAID FEDERAL SHARE OF MATCHING FUNDS

Yang Jiang Sonji Harrington

Dulles Corridor Enterprise Financial Update Dulles Corridor Advisory Committee Meeting

HART Financial Snapshot. HART Finance and Audit Committee January 23, 2017

DART Fare Structure Programs

Media Release 9 th March 2015

Approve Financial Stability Plan (aka Project FIT) for UW Medicine

Dashboards Tools May 14 & 15, 2013 NonProfit Learning Center Discussion Leader: Kay Sohl

Executive Summary: Patent Fee Proposal

General Fund Revenue

Operating Budget Stability

Transcription:

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 4 Focus May 2015 San Francisco, California 1

Goal 4 focus Create a workplace that delivers outstanding service Objective 4.1 Improve internal communications Objective 4.2 Create a collaborative and innovative work environment Objective 4.3 Improve employee accountability Objective 4.4 Improve relationships and partnerships with our stakeholders 2

Objective 4.1 Improve internal communications Key performance indicator 4.1.1 Employee rating: I have the Information and tools I need to do my job FY13 Strongly agree Somewhat agree Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 11% 10% 15% 15% 11% 12% 23% 26% 40% 37% FY14 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 4.1.1 Employee rating: I have access to information about Agency accomplishments, current events, issues and challenges FY13 FY14 Strongly agree 21% 25% Somewhat agree 37% 38% Neither agree nor disagree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 18% 14% 13% 12% 12% 11% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Other indicators (including most recent month, prior month, same month prior year, and fiscal year averages) ID Metric FY13 Avg FY14 Avg 4.1.1 Employee rating: I have the info and tools I need to do my job; scale of 1 (high) to 5 (low) 3.5 3.5 Employee rating: I have access to info about Agency accomplishments, current events, issues and 4.1.1 challenges. 3.4 3.5 4.1.2 Percentage of employees that complete the survey 34.6% 28.3% Employee rating: I have a clear understanding of my division's goals/objectives and how they contribute to Agency 4.1.3 success. 3.4 3.5 4.1.4 Employee rating: I have received feedback on my work in the last 30 days. 3.1 3.1 4.1.5 Employee rating: I have noticed that communication between leadership and employees has improved. 2.9 3.0 4.1.6 Employee rating: Discussions with my supervisor about my performance are worthwhile. 3.4 3.5 3

Objective 4.1 Improve internal communications Key action item updates 4.1.24 Develop communications vehicles that allow for improved communications w ith operators and frontline staff Review ing system specifications for content management system/digital signs to be deployed in SFMTA facilities. Next steps include defining the system design, continuing field visits, and finalizing scope. Efforts to improve online collaboration via SharePoint are pending further discussions w ith the City s Department of Technology to ensure the Agency s business needs are met. Action item status 0% encountering issues 0% at risk 100% on track 0% on hold 0% completed 4

Objective 4.2 Create a collaborative and innovative work environment Key performance indicator 4.2.1 Employee rating: Overall employee satisfaction Very satisfied 22% 26% FY13 FY14 Somewhat satisfied Neither satisfied/dissatisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 14% 13% 13% 13% 14% 16% 33% 35% Other indicators (including most recent month, prior month, same month prior year, and fiscal year averages) ID Metric FY13 Avg FY14 Avg 4.2.1 Employee rating: Overall employee satisfaction; scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) 3.4 3.4 4.2.2 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Employee rating: My concerns, questions, and suggestions are welcomed and acted upon quickly and appropriately. 2.9 3.0 4.2.3 Employee rating: I find ways to resolve conflicts by working collaboratively with others. 3.9 3.9 4.2.4 Employee rating: I am encouraged to use innovative approaches to achieve goals. 3.3 3.4 4.2.5 Employee rating: Employees in my work unit share job knowledge to solve problems efficiently/effectively 3.7 3.8 4.2.6 Employee rating: I feel comfortable sharing my thoughts and opinions, even if they're different than others'. 3.6 3.7 4.2.7 Employee rating: My work gives me a feeling of personal accomplishment. 3.7 3.8 Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 5

Objective 4.2 Create a collaborative and innovative work environment Key action item updates 4.2.3 Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the hiring process A pilot competency based interview process has been implemented in selected recruitments w ith positive feedback from process participants. We re continuing to offer this process on a select basis. Methods of expediting the pre-employment verification and background process are being explored. 4.2.5 Real Estate for SFMTA office space and facilities locations Advancing the Agency s first shared workspace pilot in an effort to provide employees w ith collaborative environments and better utilize our limited space. In further efforts to maximize the Agency s footprint, the Facilities Task Force has conducted visits to 25 work sites and w ill be reporting recommendations to the Executive Team later this month. 4.2.6 Performance Coaching is provided to all employees tw ice a year Performance plan coaching has been offered and class sessions are being arranged upon request. Facilitators w ill be hired in June or July. Action item status 11% encountering issues 0% at risk 44% on track 33% on hold 11% completed 6

Unscheduled absence rate Objective 4.3 Improve employee accountability Metric of note 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 4.3.3 Unscheduled absence rate by employee group (Transit operators) 11.8% 9.3% 9.6% 8.8% 9.0% 8.6% 8.4% 7.1% 7.5% 7.5% 7.4% 7.7% 7.0% Apr 2014 May 2014 Jun 2014 Jul 2014 Aug 2014 Sep 2014 Oct 2014 Nov 2014 Dec 2014 Jan 2015 Feb 2015 Mar 2015 Apr 2015 Other indicators (including most recent month, prior month, same month prior year, and fiscal year averages) ID Metric Target FY14 Avg FY15 Avg April 2014 March 2015 April 2015 4.3.1 Percentage of employees with performance plans prepared by start of fiscal year 62.5% 31.3% 4.3.1 Percentage of employees with annual appraisals based on their performance plans 62.5% * 4.3.2 Percentage of strategic plan metrics reported 93.2% 94.6% 4.3.3 Unscheduled absence rate by employee group (Transit operators) 9.4% 7.9% 9.3% 7.7% 7.0% 4.3.4 Employee rating: My manager holds me accountable to achieve my written objectives 3.6 3.6 4.3.5 Employee commendations to 311 105.4 97.5 86 118 100 *Data forthcoming. Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 7

Objective 4.3 Improve employee accountability Key action item updates 4.3.8 Agency-w ide attendance management program Completed data gathering phase. Worked w ith Parking Enforcement and Transit Operations to implement a guidelines toolkit and in the process of launching multiunion pilot w ith Finance and Information Technology. Dashboards are now available for all the above groups. Electronic routing for Return-to-Work processing is on deck. Action item status 0% encountering issues 12.5% at risk 75% on track 12.5% on hold 0% completed 8

Objective 4.4 Improve relationships and partnerships with our stakeholders Key performance indicator 4.4.1 Stakeholder rating: satisfaction with SFMTA decision-making process/communications; scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) Survey recently concluded. Results pending. Other indicators (including most recent month, prior month, same month prior year, and fiscal year averages) ID Metric FY15 Avg 4.4.1 Stakeholder rating: satisfaction with SFMTA decision-making process/communications; scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) Survey recently concluded. Results pending. 9

Objective 4.4 Improve relationships and partnerships with our stakeholders Key action item updates 4.4.17 Increase awareness and visibility of the SFMTA to improve reputation Completed eight focus groups on travel behaviors, as well as an internal and external perceptions survey on the SFMTA. Initiated brand audit of external communications. Action item status 0% encountering issues 17% at risk 66% on track 17% on hold 0% completed 10

Collisions per 100,000 miles Crimes per 100,000 miles Larcenies, robberies and thefts Injuries per 200,000 hours Goal 1 metrics Key performance indicators 12 10 8 6 4 2 1.1.1 SFPD-reported Muni-related crimes/100,000 miles 10.4 Target Larcenies, robberies, thefts 9.2 8.2 8.5 8.0 6.8 120 100 80 60 40 20 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 1.2.1 Workplace injuries/200,000 hours Target 13.0 12.2 12.6 10.9 10.7 9.5 0 Oct 2014 Nov 2014 Dec 2014 Jan 2015 Feb 2015 Mar 2015 0 0 Oct 2014 Nov 2014 Dec 2014 Jan 2015 Feb 2015 Mar 2015 Target 1.3.1 Muni collisions/100,000 miles 8 6 6.5 5.8 7.1 6.2 6.6 7.2 4 2 0 Oct 2014 Nov 2014 Dec 2014 Jan 2015 Feb 2015 Mar 2015 Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 11

Goal 2 metrics Make transit, walking, bicycling, taxi, ridesharing and carsharing the preferred means of travel Objective 2.1 Improve customer service and communications Objective 2.2 Improve transit performance Objective 2.3 Increase use of all non-private auto modes Objective 2.4 Improve parking utilization and manage parking demand 12

Percentage of arrivals Percentage of arrivals Weighted Response % Average Weighted Rating <28 day resolution rate Goal 2 metrics Key performance indicators Average Rating 35% 32% 31% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 8% 6% 4% 2% 2.1.1 Customer Rating: Overall customer satisfaction with transit services; scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high) % Satisfied or Very Satisfied % Dissatisfied or Very Dissatisfied 33% 32% 33% 30% 29% 26% FY14 Q4 FY15 Q1 FY15 Q2 FY15 Q3 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 2.2.1 Percentage of transit trips with <2 min bunching on Rapid Network (<1 min for headways of 5 min or Target less) 7.6% 6.6% 5.9% 5.9% 6.2% 6.3% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 2.1.7 Percentage of actionable 311 Muni-related complaints addressed within 28 days 74% 74% 84% 86% 79% 86% Oct 2014 Nov 2014 Dec 2014 Jan 2015 Feb 2015 Mar 2015 2.2.1 Percentage of transit trips with + 5 min gaps on Rapid Network Target 18.2% 19.4% 16.6% 16.0% 15.9% 15.7% 0% Nov 2014 Dec 2014 Jan 2015 Feb 2015 Mar 2015 Apr 2015 0% Nov 2014 Dec 2014 Jan 2015 Feb 2015 Mar 2015 Apr 2015 1 Results are based on a non-probability sample from opt-in SFMTA online survey conducted quarterly and are weighted to reflect the geographic distribution of San Francisco s population. Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 13

Percentage of arrivals Percentage of trips Goal 2 metrics Key performance indicators continued 2.2.6 Percentage of on-time performance 2.3.1 Non-private auto mode share, FY15 (all trips) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 80% 60% 55.6% Target 53.3% 57.8% 58.4% 58.7% 58.9% Nov 2014 Dec 2014 Jan 2015 Feb 2015 Mar 2015 Apr 2015 2.4.1 Percentage of metered hours with no rate change in SFpark pilot areas 1 57.8% 62.2% 72.5% 73.4% 56.5% 60.3% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 27% Drive alone 21% Drive with others 25% 23% 4% Transit Walking Bicycling, Taxi, TNC, and other 40% 20% 0% Mar-13 Aug-13 Nov-13 Feb-14 Jun-14 Apr-15 Sensor Based Rate Adjustments SIRA (Sensor Independent Rate Adjustments) 1 Increase in percent of metered hours with no rate change indicates achievement of price point and parking availability goals. Sensor based rate adjustments were limited to SFpark pilot blocks with 50% or more parking sensor coverage through February 2014. Sensor Independent Rate Adjustments (SIRA) based on meter payment data started in June 2014 and include all SFpark pilot area blocks including those that fell below the 50% parking sensor threshold. These blocks have not approached their price point yet, which lowers the baseline for this metric. Moving forward, June 2014 will be considered the new baseline for SIRA. Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 14

Goal 3 metrics Improve the environment and quality of life in San Francisco Objective 3.1 Reduce the Agency s and the transportation system s resource consumption, emissions, waste, and noise Objective 3.2 Increase the transportation system s positive impact to the economy Objective 3.3 Allocate capital resources effectively Objective 3.4 Deliver services efficiently Objective 3.5 Reduce capital and operating structural deficits 15

Cost per revenue hour Dollars ($M) Goal 3 metrics Key performance indicators 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 3.1.1 SFMTA carbon footprint (metric tons C02e) 48,556 45,455 FY12 FY13 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 3.2.1 Estimated economic impact of Muni service delays (Monthly $M) $1.8 $1.9 $2.3 $2.0 $1.8 $2.5 Jul 2014 Aug 2014 Sep 2014 Oct 2014 Nov 2014 Dec 2014 3.3.1 Percentage of all capital projects delivered onbudget by phase Measure to be reported by end of FY15. $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 3.4.1 Average annual transit cost per revenue hour 1 $176 $181 $189 $202 $206 $214 $214 $223 $207 $208 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 1 Based on preliminary unaudited financials. Figures are adjusted for inflation to reflect FY14 dollars. Note: Reported FY13 results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 16

Millions Goal 3 metrics Key performance indicators continued 3.5.1 Operating and capital structural deficit (FY14) $300 $250 FY12 FY13 FY14 $260 $260 $260 $200 $150 $100 $50 FY12 $70 FY13 $70 FY14 $35 Additional $1.7B 5-Year shortfall for bike, pedestrian, facilities and transit $0 Operations SOGR Note: Reported results are subject to change as data quality improves or new data become available. 17

Goal 3 financials Expenditures (FY15 as of March 2015) EXPENDITURES Revised Budget Date Actuals: Year to Encumbrances Total Projection for the Year (1) Saving/(Overage) SFMTA Agency Wide $99,844,953 $50,179,722 $16,995,931 $92,659,270 $7,185,683 Board of Directors $609,825 $383,946 $2,138 $542,414 $67,411 Capital Programs and Construction $573,771 ($3,409,719) $946,817 $573,772 $0 Communications $5,950,277 $2,186,876 $606,531 $5,132,964 $817,313 Director of Transportation $2,670,049 $1,644,945 $292,614 $2,450,055 $219,995 Finance and Information Technology $82,928,333 $48,678,598 $16,117,866 $78,148,691 $4,779,642 Government Affairs $1,035,951 $563,369 $208,627 $1,023,788 $12,163 Human Resources $32,348,702 $20,647,251 $4,329,070 $32,775,303 ($426,601) Safety $4,097,506 $2,357,360 $1,211,476 $4,507,351 ($409,845) Sustainable Streets $152,348,732 $97,279,601 $22,123,245 $151,420,121 $928,611 Transit Services $569,046,322 $376,780,175 $50,520,069 $583,240,842 ($14,194,520) Taxi and Accessible Services $29,851,599 $15,738,782 $11,060,796 $28,796,942 $1,054,658 TOTAL $981,306,021 $613,030,906 $124,415,180 $981,271,512 $34,508 (1) Expenditures projection is based on all encumbrances spent in FY2015. 18

Goal 3 financials Revenues (FY15 as of March 2015) Actuals Year to Date Total Projection for the Year REVENUE Revised Budget Surplus/(Deficit) TRANSIT FARES Cable Car Fares $25,809,060 $20,502,631 $26,962,888 $1,153,828 Cash Fares $77,900,551 $65,173,636 $84,418,418 $6,517,867 Other Fares $7,280,441 $3,119,002 $3,811,839 ($3,468,602) Passes $93,103,795 $72,715,680 $93,213,778 $109,983 TRANSIT FARES Total $204,093,847 $161,510,949 $208,406,923 $4,313,076 PARKING FEES & FINES General Fund Baseline Transfer (2) $67,900,000 $50,925,000 $68,610,000 $710,000 Citations and Fines $96,426,440 $77,723,539 $99,672,037 $3,245,597 Garage Revenue $62,655,325 $50,987,704 $66,454,270 $3,798,945 Meter Revenue $44,594,452 $41,367,446 $52,102,996 $7,508,544 Permit Revenue $13,200,818 $10,077,132 $15,233,204 $2,032,386 PARKING FEES & FINES Total $284,777,035 $231,080,821 $302,072,506 $17,295,471 Operating Grants $128,590,739 $94,135,766 $136,590,739 $8,000,000 Taxi Service $14,244,560 $7,792,016 $9,186,021 ($5,058,539) Other Revenues $28,853,509 $24,664,506 $29,996,508 $1,142,999 General Fund Transfer (2) $247,860,000 $185,895,000 $253,120,000 $5,260,000 Fund Balance for Current Year Budget $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 Fund Balance for Prior Year Encumbrance Carry Forward $61,865,344 $61,865,344 $61,865,344 $0 TOTAL $990,285,034 $786,944,401 $1,021,238,041 $30,953,007 (2) The General fund baseline and parking tax transfers are projected at $5.9 million more than AAO budget according to the information provided by the Controller s Office. 19

Goal 3 financials Overtime Report (FY15 as of March 2015) FUND/DIVISION ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET ACTUALS FISCAL YEAR TO DATE (3) PROJECTION FOR REMAINING MONTHS END OF YEAR PROJECTION SURPLUS (DEFICIT) (4) OPERATING FUND TRANSIT SERVICES DIVISION Transit Operators $23,586,620 $18,806,945 $7,870,298 $26,677,243 ($3,090,623) Transit Vehicle Maintenance $7,037,296 $9,240,303 $3,866,866 $13,107,169 ($6,069,873) Transit All Others $4,066,867 $6,342,189 $2,654,068 $8,996,258 ($4,929,391) Subtotal Transit Services Division $34,690,783 $34,389,437 $14,391,232 $48,780,669 ($14,089,886) SUSTAINABLE STREETS DIVISION Parking Control Officers $994,984 $663,914 $277,834 $941,747 $53,237 Sustainable Streets All Others $794,714 $423,571 $177,255 $600,826 $193,888 Subtotal Sustainable Streets Division $1,789,698 $1,087,485 $455,089 $1,542,574 $247,124 SFMTA AGENCY WIDE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ALL OTHER DIVISIONS $889,774 $847,404 $354,620 $1,202,024 ($312,250) TOTAL OPERATING FUND $37,370,255 $36,324,326 $15,200,941 $51,525,267 ($14,155,012) NON OPERATING FUND Capital Programs & Construction $0 $824,123 $344,878 $1,169,001 ($1,169,001) Sustainable Streets Engineering Programs $0 $250,762 $104,938 $355,700 ($355,700) Total Non-Operating Fund $0 $1,074,885 $449,816 $1,524,700 ($1,524,700) TOTAL $37,370,255 $37,399,211 $15,650,757 $53,049,968 ($15,679,713) (3) Reported overtime actuals and resulting deficit are net of cost recovery for events or services that includes reimbursements for payroll (both regular and overtime), overhead, and other non-labor costs as applicable. Actual cost recoveries total $1.8 million as of March 2015 and projection for FY15 is at $2.5 million. 20