PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION In order to facilitate the development of a that includes valuable input from the community, the City of Paramount solicited public involvement on the ning Steering Committee, which had the primary responsibility of providing guidance for detailing and ranking the hazards included within the Plan. The table on the following page provides the information and attendance for the Steering Committee participants. Participation on the Steering Committee included attending periodic Steering Committee meetings, identifying and ranking hazards, developing mitigation goals and objectives, compiling the asset inventory and conducting the loss estimates, identifying current mitigation efforts and potential mitigation projects, and reviewing chapters of the Plan throughout the development process. The pages following the Steering Committee Participants table provide announcements, presentation materials and discussion topics from the Steering Committee meetings. City of Paramount D-1

Name Affiliation Title SCM 1 SCM 2 SCM 3 SCM 4 SCM 5 Ryan Bray Project Coordinator X X X X X Terry Cahoon City of Paramount Assistant Finance Director X Mike Carrillo City of Paramount Finance X X X X Bill Clausen American Red Cross Volunteer Board Member X X X Jaime DeGuzman City of Paramount PT Accountant X Lou Demari Los Angeles County Fire Department Captain X Cindy DiPaola Paramount Unified School District Director of Operations X X Dez Ganillo Los Angeles Sheriff s Department Detective X Jason Jacobsen City of Paramount Management Analyst X X X X X Stephen Kucharczk - Resident X Jeff Lee Los Angeles Fire Department Fire Prevention Inspector X Adriana Lopez City of Paramount Assistant Public Safety Director X X X X X Wendy Macias City of Paramount Community Development Planner X X X X City of Paramount D-2

Name Affiliation Title SCM 1 SCM 2 SCM 3 SCM 4 SCM 5 Carlos Mendoza City of Paramount Public Safety X X X X Sara Ho City of Paramount Management Analyst X X X X Janene Ottaiano City of Paramount Human Resources Manager X X X X Tony Pena City of Paramount Recreation Supervisor X X X X La Fonda Riggins Los Angeles County Fire Department Community Service Representative X Carlos Sanchez Los Angeles County Sherriff s Department Sargent X Colin Scholtz Project Engineer X X X X X Martene Vargas City of Paramount Recreation Supervisor X Justin Willis Promise Hospital: Suburban Medical Center Director of Facilities X Michael Zymkowitz Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department Detective Bureau Sargent X X City of Paramount D-3

Steering Committee Announcements

Potential Steering Committee Participants The following list outlines potential Steering Committee participants that should be invited to the initial meeting. The invitation should be documented to be included in the as evidence of public and stakeholder outreach. An article should also be run in the local newspaper and on the City website to solicit public involvement. 1. City of Paramount Planning and Safety Representatives 2. Public Works Representatives 3. Engineering Representatives 4. Local Fire Department Representatives 5. Local Police Department Representatives 6. Los Angeles County Office of Emergency Services Representatives 7. Local Hospital Representatives 8. Local School Representatives 9. Interested Public Representatives 10. Neighboring Communities 1

INFORMATION REQUEST requests any of the following existing plans and information from the City to assist in the update of the. 1. Previous 2. General Plan. 3. List of any natural hazards that have impacted facilities/buildings in the past (including the date, hazard, and damage description with dollar estimates). This includes, but is not limited to, the following hazards: Earthquake Fire Flooding Wind Severe Storm Pipeline Failure Reservoir Failure Drought Extreme Heat Hazardous Materials/Terrorism 4. List of any repetitive damage properties that have received FEMA funding following emergency events. 5. List of critical assets including facilities such as City buildings, Police Stations, Fire Stations, Schools, Historic Buildings, Hospitals, etc. This list should include the facility address in order to facilitate mapping. 6. List of mitigation projects currently in place (seismic building retrofit, water storage tank seismic valves and flexible piping, back-up power for key facilities, vegetation management, etc.). 7. Electronic GIS files, as available. 8. Emergency Response/Operations Plan. 1

9. Flood insurance studies 10. The City s existing authorities, policies, and resources to accomplish hazard mitigation (e.g., Public Works, regulatory authorities for planning and building codes, emergency management, etc.). 11. Status of mitigation actions identified in the previous Plan. 12. Any other emergency mitigation plans, projects, or information of relevance. 2

Steering Committee Meeting #1

MEETING AGENDA City of Paramount Project Overview and Background Steering Committee Goals Risk Assessment Background RMP Steering Committee Meeting #1: Project Initiation, Hazard Identification, Information Collection March 6, 2013, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com Hazard Identification and Ranking Information Collection DISASTER MITIGATION ACT OF 2000 Project Overview Revitalized Federal Planning Requirements State and Local s Plans must be updated every five years Federal Grant Funding Eligibility Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program (PDM) Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 is intended to facilitate cooperation between state and local authorities on risk reduction measures and to expedite funding allocation, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com PUBLIC PROCESS STEERING COMMITTEE GOALS DMA 2000 Stresses Public Participation: An open public involvement process that is comprehensive, starts early and continuous Coordination with neighboring communities and various interest groups in Plan development Review existing Plan for implementation Review the list of potential hazards and add additional hazards for the revision Determine the hazard impacts throughout the City of Paramount Interface with partner agencies to determine existing mitigation measures Develop possible approaches to projects which will reduce the impacts Prioritize mitigation projects for implementation 1

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING SCHEDULE Meeting #1 Project Initiation, Hazard Identification, and Information Collection Meeting #2 Review and Update Goals and Objectives Meeting #3 Identify Existing Mitigation Features and Potential Projects Meeting #4 Implementation Plan Development Meeting #5 Draft Local HMP Review Meeting #6 Presentation of Final Documents Risk Assessment Methodology, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com RISK ASSESSMENT POTENTIAL HAZARDS HAZARDS FROM PREVIOUS PLAN Earthquake Utility Loss Floods Transportation Accident/Incident Water/Waste Water/Sanitation Loss Terrorism & Weapons of Mass Destruction Explosions Transportation Failure Severe Weather & Destructive Winds Economic Loss Biological/Human Disease Data Telecommunication Loss Urban Fire Drought Dam Failure RISK ASSESSMENT POTENTIAL HAZARDS ADDITIONAL HAZARDS TO REVIEW Power Failure Pipeline Failure Severe Storm Hazardous Materials Release Landslides Others? RISK RANK METHODOLOGY RISK RANK METHODOLOGY The risk ranking is facilitated using an automated interactive software spreadsheet program that asks specific questions on potential hazards and then assigns a relative value to each potential hazard accordingly. Interactive Risk Ranking Spreadsheet The result of the workshop will be a ranked list of hazards to be studied in detail in the. 2

RISK RANKING PROBABILITY/FREQUENCY Recurrence Interval Prediction of how often a hazard will occur in the future, including projected return intervals RISK RANKING CONSEQUENCE/SEVERITY Physical Damage Structures and lifelines Economic Impact Loss of power, water, sanitation, roads, etc. Probability/Frequency Rank Descriptors Rank Probability/Frequency Rank Descriptors No damage 1 Rank Infeasible event - not applicable due to geographic location characteristics 0 Rare event - occurs less than once every 50 years 1 Infrequent event - occurs between once every 8 years and once every 50 years (inclusive) 2 Minor/slight damage to buildings and structures, no loss of lifelines, first aid injury and no disability Moderate building damage, minor loss of lifelines (less than 12 hours), lost time injury but no disability 2 3 Regular event - occurs between once a year and once every 7 years 3 Moderate building damage, lifeline loss (less than 24 hours), severe injury or disability 4 Frequent event - occurs more than once a year 4 Extensive building damage, widespread loss of lifelines (water, gas, electricity, sanitation, roads), loss of life 5 RISK RANKING VULNERABILITY RISK RANKING MATRIX Impact Area Area impacted by a hazard event Secondary Impacts Capability of triggering additional hazards Onset - Period of time between initial recognition of an approaching hazard and when the hazard begins to impact the community Vulnerability Rank Descriptors No physical damage, no secondary impacts 1 Localized damage area 2 Localized damage area, minor secondary impacts, delayed hazard onset 3 Moderate damage area, moderate secondary impacts, moderate warning time 4 Rank Probability/Frequency Description Rare Event: Occurs less than once every 50 years Infrequent Event: Occurs between once every 8 years and once every 50 years (inclusive) Regular Event: Occurs between once a year and once every 7 years Risk Ranking Matrix Probability/Frequency Consequence/Severity Value 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 2 4 6 8 10 Vulnerability 3 3 6 9 12 15 4 4 8 12 16 20 5 5 10 15 20 25 Probability/Frequency Consequence/Severity Value 2 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 8 12 16 20 Vulnerability 3 6 12 18 24 30 4 8 16 24 32 40 5 10 20 30 40 50 Probability/Frequency Consequence/Severity Value 3 1 2 3 4 5 1 3 6 9 12 15 2 6 12 18 24 30 Vulnerability 3 9 18 27 36 45 4 12 24 36 48 60 5 15 30 45 60 75 Probability/Frequency Consequence/Severity Value 4 1 2 3 4 5 Widespread damage area, significant secondary impacts, no warning time 5 Frequent Event: Occurs more than once a year Vulnerability 1 4 8 12 16 20 2 8 16 24 32 40 3 12 24 36 48 60 4 16 32 48 64 80 5 20 40 60 80 100 RISK RANK CATEGORIZATION Risk Rank Equation Risk = Probability x Consequence x Vulnerability Risk Rank Categorization High Hazard 50 to 100 Contact Information Moderately High Hazard 25 to 49 Moderate Hazard 15 to 24 Moderately Low Hazard 5 to 14 Low Hazard 1 to 4, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com 3

CONTACT INFORMATION Colin Scholtz, Inc. 300 Goddard, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92618 Office Phone: 949/282-0123 x245 Fax: 949/743-2932 Email: Colin.Scholtz@RMPCorp.com Web: www.rmpcorp.com 4

Steering Committee Meeting #2

MEETING AGENDA City of Paramount Review Hazard Rankings HMP Goals and Objectives Review and Update Asset Inventory List RMP Steering Committee Meeting #2: Hazard Rankings Review, Goals and Objectives, Asset Inventory July 18, 2013, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com RISK RANK METHODOLOGY Hazard Rankings Review The risk ranking is facilitated using an automated interactive software spreadsheet program that asks specific questions on potential hazards and then assigns a relative value to each potential hazard accordingly. The result of the workshop will be a ranked list of hazards to be studied in detail in the., Inc. www.rmpcorp.com RISK RANK METHODOLOGY RISK RANKING MATRIX Interactive Risk Ranking Spreadsheet Probability/Frequency Description Rare Event: Occurs less than once every 50 years Risk Ranking Matrix Probability/Frequency Consequence/Severity Value 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 1 2 3 4 5 2 2 4 6 8 10 Vulnerability 3 3 6 9 12 15 4 4 8 12 16 20 5 5 10 15 20 25 Probability/Frequency Consequence/Severity Infrequent Event: Occurs between once every 8 years and once every 50 years (inclusive) Value 2 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 8 12 16 20 Vulnerability 3 6 12 18 24 30 4 8 16 24 32 40 5 10 20 30 40 50 Probability/Frequency Consequence/Severity Regular Event: Occurs between once a year and once every 7 years Value 3 1 2 3 4 5 1 3 6 9 12 15 2 6 12 18 24 30 Vulnerability 3 9 18 27 36 45 4 12 24 36 48 60 5 15 30 45 60 75 Probability/Frequency Consequence/Severity Value 4 1 2 3 4 5 Frequent Event: Occurs more than once a year Vulnerability 1 4 8 12 16 20 2 8 16 24 32 40 3 12 24 36 48 60 4 16 32 48 64 80 5 20 40 60 80 100 1

HAZARD RANKINGS Develop Mitigation Goals and Objectives, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com GOALS AND OBJECTIVES PREVIOUS PLAN GOALS Review Previous HMP Goals and Objectives Engage in discussions to review and develop Goals and Objectives specific to the needs of the City of Paramount Support the priorities of the City of Paramount; its mandate, employees, students, citizens and the business community Promote economic development consistent with seismic, floodplain and risk management guidance as developed by the City of Paramount and its agencies and/or organizations Encourage scientific study and the development of data to support mitigation strategies for those hazards that are a threat to the City of Paramount Promote the recognition of the real value of hazard mitigation to public facilities, public safety and the welfare of all citizens in the City of Paramount Support the mitigation efforts of private citizens, non-profit organizations, community-based organization and private business throughout the City PREVIOUS PLAN OBJECTIVES Identify mitigation actions to reduce loss of lives and property Implement mitigation actions to reduce loss of lives and property, where feasible Identify mitigation strategies that will allow the City of Paramount to perform its primary mission and goals Identify mitigation opportunities for short- and long-range planning considerations Maintain safe building and zoning codes that support scientific finds of a known risk Identify lead City of Paramount Departments and Agencies that have an interest in mitigation of specific hazards PREVIOUS PLAN OBJECTIVES (cont.) Develop a standard mitigation program utilizing authorities, policies and programs of each City of Paramount Department and/or Agency Organize, train and maintain an effective and ongoing City of Paramount Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee that will facilitate implementation of the City of Paramount Mitigation Plan Review and update other City of Paramount programs to identify current and future mitigation goals and objectives in compliance with all city, county, state and Federal requirements Gain support for the City of Paramount s administration for the City of Paramount Multi- implementation Achieve the overall goal of developing a comprehensive mitigation program with Federal, state, county and city organizations and other appropriate jurisdictions Support and expand identified hazard mitigation strategies as set forth in the Safety Element to the City of Paramount General Plan and all other City plans 2

VALIDATE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Validate the previous HMP Goals and Objectives Ensure they align with current trends in the City Develop hazard-specific goals and objectives These will be used to brainstorm possible mitigation actions in the future Next Steps, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com ASSET INVENTORY Review Asset Inventory Types and number of existing and future buildings Infrastructure Critical Facilities Loss Estimates Review each asset category and assign potential percentage of damage expected due to each identified hazard Contact Information, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com CONTACT INFORMATION Colin Scholtz, Inc. 300 Goddard, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92618 Office Phone: 949/282-0123 x245 Fax: 949/743-2932 Email: Colin.Scholtz@RMPCorp.com Web: www.rmpcorp.com 3

Steering Committee Meeting #3

MEETING AGENDA RMP City of Paramount Steering Committee Meeting #3: Asset Inventory and Vulnerability Assessment November 14, 2013, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com Review HMP Goals and Objectives Review and Update Asset Inventory List Vulnerability Assessment (Loss Estimate Calculations) Assign estimated percent damage to each asset from the identified hazards HAZARD RANKINGS Hazard Rankings Review, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com CURRENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Mitigation Goals and Objectives Review 1. Protect Lives and Property Identify mitigation actions to reduce loss of lives and property Implement mitigation actions to reduce loss of lives and property, where feasible 2. Support the Priorities of the City, its mandates, employees, students, residents and the business community Identify mitigation strategies that will allow the City of Paramount to perform its primary mission and goals Maintain safe building and zoning codes that support scientific findings of a known risk, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com 1

CURRENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONT.) 3. Promote development consistent with seismic, floodplain and risk management guidance as developed by the City Identify mitigation opportunities for short- and long-range planning considerations in accordance with the City of Paramount s risk management guidance Encourage scientific study and the development of data to support mitigation strategies for those hazards that are a threat to the City of Paramount 4. Promote the recognition of the real value of hazard mitigation to public facilities, public safety and the welfare of all residents in the City of Paramount Organize, train and maintain an effective and ongoing City of Paramount Hazard Mitigation Steering Committee that will facilitate implementation of the City of Paramount and increase visibility of mitigation efforts Gain support of the City of Paramount s administration for the City of Paramount implementation CURRENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES (CONT.) 5. Support the mitigation efforts of residents, non-profit organizations, community-based organization and private businesses Support and expand identified hazard mitigation strategies as set forth in the Safety Element of the City of Paramount General Plan and all other City of Paramount plans that contain Hazard Mitigation Strategies 6. Ensure all codes and standards are consistent with hazard mitigation Identify lead City of Paramount Departments and Agencies that have a role in mitigation of specific hazards and utilize those departments and agencies to update a standard mitigation program Review and update other City of Paramount programs to identify current and future mitigation goals and objectives in compliance with all City, County, State and Federal requirements HAZARD-SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES Hazard-Specific Objectives Hazard Mitigated Hazard-Specific Objectives Earthquake Urban Fire Hazardous Materials Release / Industrial Accident / Refinery Explosion Hazards EQ01 Identify potential vulnerabilities in the City and conduct seismic retrofitting, as appropriate. EQ02 Ensure earthquake preparedness education remains a priority. UF01 Identify potential hazards associated with urban fires. HR01 Continue to implement best practices for hazardous material handling. HR02 Coordinate with the Refinery to ensure that their safety plans are current and up to date. Asset Inventory and Vulnerability Assessment Terrorism & Weapons of Mass Destruction TW01 Continue to ensure security awareness training is provided to contract agencies. Pipeline Failure PF01 Continue to coordinate with pipeline owners to ensure pipeline integrity is maintained in order to minimize the potential for failures. PF02 Continue to implement Dig Alert to minimize the potential for inadvertently rupturing a pipeline during excavation., Inc. www.rmpcorp.com ASSET INVENTORY & LOSS ESTIMATES Review Asset Inventory Vulnerability Assessment (Loss Estimates) ASSET INVENTORY Review Asset Inventory Types and number of existing and future buildings Infrastructure Critical Facilities 2

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT ESTIMATES Review each asset and assign potential percentage of damage expected due to each identified hazard Next Steps, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com MITIGATION ACTION WORKSHEET MITIGATION ACTION CATEGORIES Summarize mitigation project specifications Identify project goal, objective, and category Capital Improvements Plan Prevention Property Protection Public Education and Awareness Natural Resource Protection Emergency Services Structural Projects NEXT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING The next Steering Committee meeting will develop potential mitigation projects within the City: To be scheduled Contact Information, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com 3

CONTACT INFORMATION Colin Scholtz, Inc. 300 Goddard, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92618 Office Phone: 949/282-0123 x245 Fax: 949/743-2932 Email: Colin.Scholtz@RMPCorp.com Web: www.rmpcorp.com 4

Mitigation Activity Identification Goal/Hazard: Objective: Circle all that apply: - Prevention - Public Education & Awareness - Emergency Services - Property Protection - Natural Resource Protection - Structural Projects Mitigation Activity Comments (problem addressed, information sources, etc.)

Steering Committee Meeting #4

MEETING OBJECTIVES City of Paramount Review Mitigation Goals and Objectives Develop Potential Mitigation Projects Steering Committee Meeting #4: Mitigation Action Identification April 16, 2014 RMP, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com HAZARD RANKING SUMMARY Hazard Ranking Review RMP Hazard, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com Mitigation Plan OVERALL PLAN GOALS RMP Hazard Mitigation Goals and Objectives Review, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com Protect Lives and Property Support the priorities of the City, its mandates, employees, students, residents and the business community Promote development consistent with seismic, floodplain and risk management guidance as developed by the City Promote the recognition of the real value of hazard mitigation to public facilities, public safety and the welfare of all residents in the City of Paramount Support the mitigation efforts of residents, non-profit organizations, community-based organization and private businesses Ensure all codes and standards are consistent with hazard mitigation Mitigation Plan 1

MITIGATION ACTION CATEGORIES Identify Potential Mitigation Actions Prevention Property Protection Public Education and Awareness Natural Resource Protection Emergency Services Structural Projects RMP Hazard, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com Mitigation Plan MITIGATION ACTION WORKSHEET EARTHQUAKE EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Summarize mitigation action specifications Identify action goal, objective, & category Building Retrofits Anchor Electrical Transformers Install Expansion Joints Reinforce Well Shaft or Install Submersible Pump Restrain Pipes Improve Pipe Materials Install Tank Anchors Install Friction Dampers on Elevated Tanks URBAN FIRE EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Community Awareness Fire-safe Practices for Structures and Landscaping Enhancement of Fire-Suppression Capabilities Fire Risk Mapping HAZMAT RELEASE/INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Emergency Plans Transportation Disposal Emergency Response Teams Industrial Site Buffering 2

TERRORISM & WMD EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Emergency Plans Emergency Response Teams Security Training PIPEPLINE FAILURE EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Pipeline Location and Design Digging Hotlines Contingency Planning Improvements to Maps and Records UTILITY LOSS EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Contingency Planning Enhancement of Emergency Response Teams Emergency Fuel and Water Distribution and Storage Systems Preparedness and Response Plans FLOOD EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Acquisition Relocation Elevation Dry-Floodproofing (e.g., plastic sheeting) Wet-Floodproofing (e.g., water resistant materials) Stormwater Management Ordinances or Amendments Floodplain Ordinances or Amendments Storm Drainage System Improvements Structural Flood Control Measures (e.g., levees, dams, floodwalls) SEVERE WEATHER & DESTRUCTIVE WINDS EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Implement Tree Trimming Retrofits Anchoring Traffic Light Upgrades DROUGHT EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Water Use Ordinances Contingency Plans Emergency Water Distribution and Storage Systems Water Conservation Education System Retrofits Leak Detection Programs 3

DAM FAILURE EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Inundation Zone Mapping Preparedness and Response Plans Notification Systems Structural Storage Tank Reservoir Improvements TRANSPORTATION ACCIDENT EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Enhancement of Emergency Response Teams Airport/Freeway/Rail Site Buffering Contingency and Emergency Planning BIOLOGICAL/ HUMAN DISEASE EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Emergency Planning Coordination with appropriate Agencies CIVIL UNREST/RIOTS EXAMPLE MITIGATION PROJECTS Enhancement of Emergency Response Teams Contingency and Emergency Planning Next Steering Committee Meeting Next Steps The next Steering Committee meeting will consist of a Benefit-Cost Review of the identified Mitigation Actions: To be scheduled RMP Hazard, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com Mitigation Plan 4

CONTACT INFORMATION Colin Scholtz, Inc. 300 Goddard, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92618 Office Phone: 949/282-0123 x245 Email: Colin.Scholtz@RMPCorp.com Web: www.rmpcorp.com 5

Steering Committee Meeting #5

MEETING OBJECTIVES City of Paramount Hazard Rankings Review Review Proposed Mitigation Projects Conduct a Benefit-Cost Review of Mitigation Projects Steering Committee Meeting #5: Mitigation Project Benefit-Cost Review August 28, 2014 RMP, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com HAZARD RANKINGS Hazard Rankings Review RMP Hazard, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com Mitigation Plan SCENARIOS CONSIDERED FOR MITIGATION RMP Hazard Review of Proposed Mitigation Projects, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com Earthquake Urban Fire Hazmat/Industrial Accidents Terrorism and WMD Pipeline Failure Utility Loss Flood Severe Weather Drought Dam Failure Transportation Incident Biological/Human Disease Civil Unrest/Riot Mitigation Plan 1

BENEFIT-COST REVIEW Review each identified mitigation project and quantify the benefits and costs of implementing each project Assign a priority based on the benefit-cost review Benefit-Cost Review RMP Hazard, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com Mitigation Plan BENEFIT-COST REVIEW EXAMPLE Example from FEMA: Next Steps RMP, Inc. www.rmpcorp.com NEXT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING CONTACT INFORMATION The next meeting will consist of a review of the Draft : To be scheduled Colin R. Scholtz, PE, Inc. 300 Goddard, Suite 220 Irvine, California 92618 Office Phone: 949/282-0123 x245 Email: Colin.Scholtz@RMPCorp.com Web: www.rmpcorp.com 2

Example Benefits Avoided Physical Damages Buildings Contents Infrastructure Landscaping Site Contamination Vehicles Equipment Avoided Loss-of-Function Costs Displacement costs for temporary quarters Loss of rental income Loss of business income Lost wages Disruption time for residents Loss of public services Economic impact of loss of utility services Economic impact of road/bridge closures Avoided Casualties Deaths Injuries Illnesses Avoided Emergency Management Costs Emergency operations center costs Evacuation or rescue costs Security costs Temporary protective measure costs Debris removal and cleanup costs Other management costs Planning Costs Construction Cost Administration/Management Cost Time Needed to Implement Social Impacts Public/Political Opposition Environmental Impacts Example Costs

Benefit Cost Review Example

Public Review Meeting Announcement

Public Meeting Advertisement The City of Paramount solicited public involvement during review of the draft Plan. The following graphic provides the website advertisement. The following is the text, excerpted from the graphic above: Public Meeting for Updating City's "" According to U.S. government regulations, if a city is to qualify for federal grant money in the aftermath of a natural disaster, it must develop a plan to reduce or eliminate any vulnerabilities to such disasters. The City of Paramount is currently updating its to fulfill the requirement and prepare for potential disasters. The City will be holding a meeting of the Local Hazard Mitigation Committee on Tuesday, January 20th from 10:00 a.m. until noon regarding this updating process. The meeting is open for members of the public to attend. It will take place at the Clearwater Building, 16401 Paramount Blvd., on the second floor. For more information, please call Adriana Lopez at (562) 220-2170. 1