Stochastic Processes and Brownian Motion

Similar documents
Binomial Model for Forward and Futures Options

Futures Options. The underlying of a futures option is a futures contract.

Futures Contracts vs. Forward Contracts

Futures Price under the BOPM

Forwards, Futures, Futures Options, Swaps. c 2009 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 367

Brownian Motion as Limit of Random Walk

AMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING. Contents

25857 Interest Rate Modelling

Gamma. The finite-difference formula for gamma is

1 Geometric Brownian motion

1.1 Basic Financial Derivatives: Forward Contracts and Options

Arbitrages and pricing of stock options

Homework Assignments

Martingale Pricing Theory in Discrete-Time and Discrete-Space Models

The stochastic calculus

Risk Neutral Valuation

Fixed-Income Options

Stochastic Calculus - An Introduction

STOCHASTIC CALCULUS AND BLACK-SCHOLES MODEL

Binomial model: numerical algorithm

Math 416/516: Stochastic Simulation

Option Pricing Formula for Fuzzy Financial Market

A No-Arbitrage Theorem for Uncertain Stock Model

Reading: You should read Hull chapter 12 and perhaps the very first part of chapter 13.

Dr. Maddah ENMG 625 Financial Eng g II 10/16/06

FINANCIAL OPTION ANALYSIS HANDOUTS

Change of Measure (Cameron-Martin-Girsanov Theorem)

Trinomial Tree. Set up a trinomial approximation to the geometric Brownian motion ds/s = r dt + σ dw. a

Drunken Birds, Brownian Motion, and Other Random Fun

1 The continuous time limit

Option Pricing Models for European Options

1 Mathematics in a Pill 1.1 PROBABILITY SPACE AND RANDOM VARIABLES. A probability triple P consists of the following components:

Continuous Processes. Brownian motion Stochastic calculus Ito calculus

Unbiased Expectations Theory

Product of Geometric Brownian Motion Processes

Lecture 17. The model is parametrized by the time period, δt, and three fixed constant parameters, v, σ and the riskless rate r.

No-arbitrage theorem for multi-factor uncertain stock model with floating interest rate

Equilibrium Term Structure Models. c 2008 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 854

Economathematics. Problem Sheet 1. Zbigniew Palmowski. Ws 2 dw s = 1 t

Brownian Motion and Ito s Lemma

Trinomial Tree. Set up a trinomial approximation to the geometric Brownian motion ds/s = r dt + σ dw. a

Brownian Motion. Richard Lockhart. Simon Fraser University. STAT 870 Summer 2011

IEOR E4703: Monte-Carlo Simulation

Geometric Brownian Motions

Continuous Time Finance. Tomas Björk

STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS

- 1 - **** d(lns) = (µ (1/2)σ 2 )dt + σdw t

Hedging under Arbitrage

M5MF6. Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing

Numerical schemes for SDEs

Optimal Search for Parameters in Monte Carlo Simulation for Derivative Pricing

Stochastic Dynamical Systems and SDE s. An Informal Introduction

The Black-Scholes PDE from Scratch

The Binomial Lattice Model for Stocks: Introduction to Option Pricing

King s College London

( ) since this is the benefit of buying the asset at the strike price rather

Partial differential approach for continuous models. Closed form pricing formulas for discretely monitored models

The Binomial Lattice Model for Stocks: Introduction to Option Pricing

Lecture 11: Ito Calculus. Tuesday, October 23, 12

arxiv: v2 [q-fin.pr] 23 Nov 2017

MATH3075/3975 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS

MASM006 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS.

The Use of Importance Sampling to Speed Up Stochastic Volatility Simulations

Computational Finance

The Binomial Model. The analytical framework can be nicely illustrated with the binomial model.

Market interest-rate models

Constructing Markov models for barrier options

BROWNIAN MOTION Antonella Basso, Martina Nardon

Aspects of Financial Mathematics:

Valuation of performance-dependent options in a Black- Scholes framework

IEOR E4703: Monte-Carlo Simulation

Pricing theory of financial derivatives

The discounted portfolio value of a selffinancing strategy in discrete time was given by. δ tj 1 (s tj s tj 1 ) (9.1) j=1

King s College London

25857 Interest Rate Modelling

From Discrete Time to Continuous Time Modeling

Advanced Topics in Derivative Pricing Models. Topic 4 - Variance products and volatility derivatives

THE MARTINGALE METHOD DEMYSTIFIED

Simulating more interesting stochastic processes

Option Pricing Models. c 2013 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 205

Convergence Analysis of Monte Carlo Calibration of Financial Market Models

************* with µ, σ, and r all constant. We are also interested in more sophisticated models, such as:

Introduction Taylor s Theorem Einstein s Theory Bachelier s Probability Law Brownian Motion Itô s Calculus. Itô s Calculus.

Numerical Simulation of Stochastic Differential Equations: Lecture 1, Part 1. Overview of Lecture 1, Part 1: Background Mater.

Introduction to Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes for Finance Lecture Notes

Continous time models and realized variance: Simulations

Modeling via Stochastic Processes in Finance

IMPA Commodities Course : Forward Price Models

Optimal stopping problems for a Brownian motion with a disorder on a finite interval

Probability in Options Pricing

VaR Estimation under Stochastic Volatility Models

Lattice (Binomial Trees) Version 1.2

Application of Stochastic Calculus to Price a Quanto Spread

Theoretical Problems in Credit Portfolio Modeling 2

Queens College, CUNY, Department of Computer Science Computational Finance CSCI 365 / 765 Fall 2017 Instructor: Dr. Sateesh Mane.

Basic Arbitrage Theory KTH Tomas Björk

Cash Accumulation Strategy based on Optimal Replication of Random Claims with Ordinary Integrals

Lecture Notes for Chapter 6. 1 Prototype model: a one-step binomial tree

Stochastic Differential equations as applied to pricing of options

Optimizing Portfolios

Transcription:

A stochastic process Stochastic Processes X = { X(t) } Stochastic Processes and Brownian Motion is a time series of random variables. X(t) (or X t ) is a random variable for each time t and is usually called the state of the process at time t. A realization of X is called a sample path. A sample path defines an ordinary function of t. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 396 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 398 Stochastic Processes (concluded) Of all the intellectual hurdles which the human mind has confronted and has overcome in the last fifteen hundred years, the one which seems to me to have been the most amazing in character and the most stupendous in the scope of its consequences is the one relating to the problem of motion. Herbert Butterfield (1900 1979) If the times t form a countable set, X is called a discrete-time stochastic process or a time series. In this case, subscripts rather than parentheses are usually employed, as in X = { X n }. If the times form a continuum, X is called a continuous-time stochastic process. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 397 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 399

Random Walks The binomial model is a random walk in disguise. Consider a particle on the integer line, 0, ±1, ±2,.... In each time step, it can make one move to the right with probability p or one move to the left with probability 1 p. This random walk is symmetric when p = 1/2. Connection with the BOPM: The particle s position denotes the cumulative number of up moves minus that of down moves. Random Walk with Drift X n = µ + X n 1 + ξ n. ξ n are independent and identically distributed with zero mean. Drift µ is the expected change per period. Note that this process is continuous in space. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 400 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 402 Position 4 2-2 -4-6 -8 20 40 60 80 Time Martingales a { X(t), t 0 } is a martingale if E[ X(t) ] < for t 0 and E[ X(t) X(u),0 u s ] = X(s), s t. (39) In the discrete-time setting, a martingale means E[ X n+1 X 1, X 2,..., X n ] = X n. (40) X n can be interpreted as a gambler s fortune after the nth gamble. Identity (40) then says the expected fortune after the (n + 1)th gamble equals the fortune after the nth gamble regardless of what may have occurred before. a The origin of the name is somewhat obscure. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 401 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 403

Martingales (concluded) A martingale is therefore a notion of fair games. Apply the law of iterated conditional expectations to both sides of Eq. (40) on p. 403 to yield for all n. E[ X n ] = E[ X 1 ] (41) Similarly, E[ X(t) ] = E[ X(0) ] in the continuous-time case. Well, no. a Still a Martingale? (continued) Consider this random walk with drift: X i 1 + ξ i, if i is even, X i = X i 2, otherwise. Above, ξ n are random variables with zero mean. 2005. a Contributed by Mr. Zhang, Ann-Sheng (B89201033) on April 13, 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 404 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 406 Still a Martingale? (concluded) Still a Martingale? Suppose we replace Eq. (40) on p. 403 with E[ X n+1 X n ] = X n. It also says past history cannot affect the future. But is it equivalent to the original definition? a a Contributed by Mr. Hsieh, Chicheng (M9007304) on April 13, 2005. It is not hard to see that X i 1, E[ X i X i 1 ] = X i 1, if i is even, otherwise. Hence it is a martingale by the new definition. But X i 1, E[ X i..., X i 2, X i 1 ] = X i 2, if i is even, otherwise. Hence it is not a martingale by the original definition. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 405 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 407

Example Consider the stochastic process { Z n n X i, n 1 }, i=1 where X i are independent random variables with zero mean. This process is a martingale because E[ Z n+1 Z 1, Z 2,..., Z n ] = E[ Z n + X n+1 Z 1, Z 2,..., Z n ] = E[ Z n Z 1, Z 2,..., Z n ] + E[ X n+1 Z 1, Z 2,..., Z n ] = Z n + E[ X n+1 ] = Z n. Probability Measure (continued) A stochastic process { X(t), t 0 } is a martingale with respect to information sets { I t } if, for all t 0, E[ X(t) ] < and for all u > t. E[ X(u) I t ] = X(t) The discrete-time version: For all n > 0, E[ X n+1 I n ] = X n, given the information sets { I n }. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 408 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 410 Probability Measure A martingale is defined with respect to a probability measure, under which the expectation is taken. A probability measure assigns probabilities to states of the world. A martingale is also defined with respect to an information set. In the characterizations (39) (40) on p. 403, the information set contains the current and past values of X by default. But it needs not be so. Probability Measure (concluded) The above implies E[ X n+m I n ] = X n for any m > 0 by Eq. (15) on p. 137. A typical I n is the price information up to time n. Then the above identity says the FVs of X will not deviate systematically from today s value given the price history. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 409 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 411

Example Consider the stochastic process { Z n nµ, n 1 }. Z n n i=1 X i. X 1, X 2,... are independent random variables with mean µ. Now, E[ Z n+1 (n + 1) µ X 1, X 2,..., X n ] = E[ Z n+1 X 1, X 2,..., X n ] (n + 1) µ = Z n + µ (n + 1) µ = Z n nµ. Martingale Pricing Recall that the price of a European option is the expected discounted future payoff at expiration in a risk-neutral economy. This principle can be generalized using the concept of martingale. Recall the recursive valuation of European option via C = [ pc u + (1 p) C d ]/R. p is the risk-neutral probability. $1 grows to $R in a period. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 412 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 414 Example (concluded) Define I n { X 1, X 2,..., X n }. Then { Z n nµ, n 1 } is a martingale with respect to { I n }. Martingale Pricing (continued) Let C(i) denote the value of the option at time i. Consider the discount process Then, [ ] C(i + 1) E C(i) = C R i+1 { C(i)/R i, i = 0, 1,..., n }. = pc u + (1 p) C d R i+1 = C R i. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 413 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 415

Martingale Pricing (continued) It is easy to show that [ ] C(k) E R k C(i) = C = C, i k. (42) Ri This formulation assumes: a 1. The model is Markovian in that the distribution of the future is determined by the present (time i) and not the past. 2. The payoff depends only on the terminal price of the underlying asset (Asian options do not qualify). a Contributed by Mr. Wang, Liang-Kai (Ph.D. student, ECE, University of Wisconsin-Madison) and Mr. Hsiao, Huan-Wen (B90902081) on May 3, 2006. Martingale Pricing (continued) Equation (43) holds for all assets, not just options. When interest rates are stochastic, the equation becomes [ ] C(i) C(k) M(i) = Eπ i, i k. (44) M(k) M(j) is the balance in the money market account at time j using the rollover strategy with an initial investment of $1. So it is called the bank account process. It says the discount process is a martingale under π. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 416 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 418 Martingale Pricing (concluded) Martingale Pricing (continued) In general, the discount process is a martingale in that [ ] C(k) Ei π R k = C(i) R i, i k. (43) E π i is taken under the risk-neutral probability conditional on the price information up to time i. This risk-neutral probability is also called the EMM, or the equivalent martingale (probability) measure. If interest rates are stochastic, then M(j) is a random variable. M(0) = 1. M(j) is known at time j 1. Identity (44) on p. 418 is the general formulation of risk-neutral valuation. Theorem 14 A discrete-time model is arbitrage-free if and only if there exists a probability measure such that the discount process is a martingale. This probability measure is called the risk-neutral probability measure. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 417 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 419

Futures Price under the BOPM Futures prices form a martingale under the risk-neutral probability. The expected futures price in the next period is ( 1 d p f Fu + (1 p f ) Fd = F u d u + u 1 ) u d d = F (p. 380). Can be generalized to F i = E π i [ F k ], i k, where F i is the futures price at time i. Martingale Pricing and Numeraire (concluded) Choose S as numeraire. Martingale pricing says there exists a risk-neutral probability π under which the relative price of any asset C is a martingale: C(i) S(i) = Eπ i [ ] C(k), i k. S(k) S(j) denotes the price of S at time j. So the discount process remains a martingale. It holds under stochastic interest rates. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 420 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 422 Martingale Pricing and Numeraire The martingale pricing formula (44) on p. 418 uses the money market account as numeraire. a It expresses the price of any asset relative to the money market account. The money market account is not the only choice for numeraire. Suppose asset S s value is positive at all times. a Leon Walras (1834 1910). Example Take the binomial model with two assets. In a period, asset one s price can go from S to S 1 or S 2. In a period, asset two s price can go from P to P 1 or P 2. Assume S 1 < S P 1 P < S 2 P 2 to rule out arbitrage opportunities. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 421 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 423

Example (continued) For any derivative security, let C 1 be its price at time one if asset one s price moves to S 1. Let C 2 be its price at time one if asset one s price moves to S 2. Replicate the derivative by solving αs 1 + βp 1 = C 1, αs 2 + βp 2 = C 2, using α units of asset one and β units of asset two. It is easy to verify that Above, Example (concluded) C P = p C 1 P 1 + (1 p) C 2 P 2. p (S/P) (S 2/P 2 ) (S 1 /P 1 ) (S 2 /P 2 ). The derivative s price using asset two as numeraire is thus a martingale under the risk-neutral probability p. The expected returns of the two assets are irrelevant. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 424 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 426 Brownian Motion a This yields Example (continued) α = P 2C 1 P 1 C 2 P 2 S 1 P 1 S 2 and β = S 2C 1 S 1 C 2 S 2 P 1 S 1 P 2. The derivative costs C = αs + βp = P 2S PS 2 P 2 S 1 P 1 S 2 C 1 + PS 1 P 1 S P 2 S 1 P 1 S 2 C 2. Brownian motion is a stochastic process { X(t), t 0 } with the following properties. 1. X(0) = 0, unless stated otherwise. 2. for any 0 t 0 < t 1 < < t n, the random variables X(t k ) X(t k 1 ) for 1 k n are independent. b 3. for 0 s < t, X(t) X(s) is normally distributed with mean µ(t s) and variance σ 2 (t s), where µ and σ 0 are real numbers. a Robert Brown (1773 1858). b So X(t) X(s) is independent of X(r) for r s < t. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 425 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 427

Brownian Motion (concluded) Such a process will be called a (µ, σ) Brownian motion with drift µ and variance σ 2. The existence and uniqueness of such a process is guaranteed by Wiener s theorem. a Although Brownian motion is a continuous function of t with probability one, it is almost nowhere differentiable. The (0, 1) Brownian motion is also called the Wiener process. a Norbert Wiener (1894 1964). Brownian Motion Is a Random Walk in Continuous Time Claim 1 A (µ, σ) Brownian motion is the limiting case of random walk. A particle moves x to the left with probability 1 p. It moves to the right with probability p after t time. Assume n t/ t is an integer. Its position at time t is Y (t) x(x 1 + X 2 + + X n ). 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 428 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 430 Example If { X(t), t 0 } is the Wiener process, then X(t) X(s) N(0, t s). A (µ, σ) Brownian motion Y = { Y (t), t 0 } can be expressed in terms of the Wiener process: Y (t) = µt + σx(t). (45) Note that Y (t + s) Y (t) N(µs, σ 2 s). Brownian Motion as Limit of Random Walk (continued) (continued) Here +1 if the ith move is to the right, X i 1 if the ith move is to the left. X i are independent with Prob[ X i = 1 ] = p = 1 Prob[ X i = 1 ]. Recall E[ X i ] = 2p 1 and Var[ X i ] = 1 (2p 1) 2. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 429 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 431

Brownian Motion as Limit of Random Walk (continued) Therefore, E[ Y (t) ] = n( x)(2p 1), Var[ Y (t) ] = n( x) 2 [ 1 (2p 1) 2 ]. With x σ t and p [ 1 + (µ/σ) t ]/2, E[ Y (t) ] = nσ t (µ/σ) t = µt, Var[ Y (t) ] = nσ 2 t [ 1 (µ/σ) 2 t ] σ 2 t, as t 0. Geometric Brownian Motion Let X { X(t), t 0 } be a Brownian motion process. The process { Y (t) e X(t), t 0 }, is called geometric Brownian motion. Suppose further that X is a (µ, σ) Brownian motion. X(t) N(µt, σ 2 t) with moment generating function [ ] E e sx(t) = E [ Y (t) s ] = e µts+(σ2 ts 2 /2) from Eq. (16) on p 139. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 432 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 434 Brownian Motion as Limit of Random Walk (concluded) Thus, { Y (t), t 0 } converges to a (µ, σ) Brownian motion by the central limit theorem. Brownian motion with zero drift is the limiting case of symmetric random walk by choosing µ = 0. Note that Var[ Y (t + t) Y (t) ] =Var[ xx n+1 ] = ( x) 2 Var[ X n+1 ] σ 2 t. Geometric Brownian Motion (continued) In particular, E[ Y (t) ] = e µt+(σ2t/2), Var[ Y (t) ] = E [ Y (t) 2 ] E[ Y (t) ] 2 ( ) = e 2µt+σ2 t e σ2t 1. Similarity to the the BOPM: The p is identical to the probability in Eq. (23) on p. 235 and x = lnu. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 433 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 435

Y(t) Geometric Brownian Motion (concluded) 6 5 4 3 2 1-1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Time (t) Then ln Y n = n lnx i i=1 is a sum of independent, identically distributed random variables. Thus { lny n, n 0 } is approximately Brownian motion. And { Y n, n 0 } is approximately geometric Brownian motion. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 436 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 438 Geometric Brownian Motion (continued) It is useful for situations in which percentage changes are independent and identically distributed. Let Y n denote the stock price at time n and Y 0 = 1. Assume relative returns Continuous-Time Financial Mathematics X i Y i Y i 1 are independent and identically distributed. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 437 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 439

Stochastic Integrals (concluded) A proof is that which convinces a reasonable man; a rigorous proof is that which convinces an unreasonable man. Mark Kac (1914 1984) The pursuit of mathematics is a divine madness of the human spirit. Alfred North Whitehead (1861 1947), Science and the Modern World Typical requirements for X in financial applications are: Prob[ t 0 X2 (s) ds < ] = 1 for all t 0 or the stronger t 0 E[ X2 (s) ] ds <. The information set at time t includes the history of X and W up to that point in time. But it contains nothing about the evolution of X or W after t (nonanticipating, so to speak). The future cannot influence the present. { X(s), 0 s t } is independent of { W(t + u) W(t), u > 0 }. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 440 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 442 Stochastic Integrals Use W { W(t), t 0 } to denote the Wiener process. The goal is to develop integrals of X from a class of stochastic processes, a I t (X) t 0 X dw, t 0. I t (X) is a random variable called the stochastic integral of X with respect to W. The stochastic process { I t (X), t 0 } will be denoted by X dw. Ito Integral A theory of stochastic integration. As with calculus, it starts with step functions. A stochastic process { X(t) } is simple if there exist 0 = t 0 < t 1 < such that X(t) = X(t k 1 ) for t [ t k 1, t k ), k = 1, 2,... for any realization (see figure next page). a Ito (1915 ). 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 441 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 443

Ito Integral (continued) Let X = { X(t), t 0 } be a general stochastic process. Then there exists a random variable I t (X), unique almost certainly, such that I t (X n ) converges in probability to I t (X) for each sequence of simple stochastic processes X 1, X 2,... such that X n converges in probability to X. If X is continuous with probability one, then I t (X n ) converges in probability to I t (X) as δ n max 1 k n (t k t k 1 ) goes to zero. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 444 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 446 Ito Integral (continued) The Ito integral of a simple process is defined as where t n = t. n 1 I t (X) X(t k )[ W(t k+1 ) W(t k ) ], (46) k=0 The integrand X is evaluated at t k, not t k+1. Define the Ito integral of more general processes as a limiting random variable of the Ito integral of simple stochastic processes. Ito Integral (concluded) It is a fundamental fact that X dw is continuous almost surely. The following theorem says the Ito integral is a martingale. A corollary is the mean value formula [ ] b E X dw = 0. Theorem 15 The Ito integral a X dw is a martingale. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 445 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 447

Discrete Approximation Recall Eq. (46) on p. 445. The following simple stochastic process { X(t) } can be used in place of X to approximate the stochastic integral t 0 X dw, X(s) X(t k 1 ) for s [ t k 1, t k ), k = 1, 2,..., n. Note the nonanticipating feature of X. The information up to time s, { X(t), W(t), 0 t s }, cannot determine the future evolution of X or W. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 448 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 450 Discrete Approximation (concluded) Suppose we defined the stochastic integral as n 1 X(t k+1 )[ W(t k+1 ) W(t k ) ]. k=0 Then we would be using the following different simple stochastic process in the approximation, Ŷ (s) X(t k ) for s [ t k 1, t k ), k = 1, 2,..., n. This clearly anticipates the future evolution of X. Ito Process The stochastic process X = { X t, t 0 } that solves X t = X 0 + t is called an Ito process. 0 a(x s, s) ds + X 0 is a scalar starting point. t 0 b(x s, s) dw s, t 0 { a(x t, t) : t 0 } and { b(x t, t) : t 0 } are stochastic processes satisfying certain regularity conditions. The terms a(x t, t) and b(x t, t) are the drift and the diffusion, respectively. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 449 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 451

Ito Process (continued) A shorthand a is the following stochastic differential equation for the Ito differential dx t, dx t = a(x t, t) dt + b(x t, t) dw t. (47) Or simply dx t = a t dt + b t dw t. This is Brownian motion with an instantaneous drift a t and an instantaneous variance b 2 t. X is a martingale if the drift a t is zero by Theorem 15 (p. 447). a Paul Langevin (1904). Euler Approximation The following approximation follows from Eq. (48), X(t n+1 ) = X(t n ) + a( X(t n ), t n ) t + b( X(t n ), t n ) W(t n ), (49) where t n n t. It is called the Euler or Euler-Maruyama method. Under mild conditions, X(t n ) converges to X(t n ). Recall that W(t n ) should be interpreted as W(t n+1 ) W(t n ) instead of W(t n ) W(t n 1 ). 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 452 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 454 Ito Process (concluded) dw is normally distributed with mean zero and variance dt. An equivalent form to Eq. (47) is where ξ N(0, 1). dx t = a t dt + b t dt ξ, (48) This formulation makes it easy to derive Monte Carlo simulation algorithms. More Discrete Approximations Under fairly loose regularity conditions, approximation (49) on p. 454 can be replaced by X(t n+1 ) = X(t n ) + a( X(t n ), t n ) t + b( X(t n ), t n ) t Y (t n ). Y (t 0 ), Y (t 1 ),... are independent and identically distributed with zero mean and unit variance. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 453 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 455

More Discrete Approximations (concluded) A simpler discrete approximation scheme: X(t n+1 ) = X(t n ) + a( X(t n ), t n ) t + b( X(t n ), t n ) t ξ. Prob[ ξ = 1 ] = Prob[ ξ = 1 ] = 1/2. Note that E[ ξ ] = 0 and Var[ ξ ] = 1. This clearly defines a binomial model. Trading and the Ito Integral (concluded) The equivalent Ito integral, G T (φ) T 0 φ t ds t = T 0 T φ t µ t dt + φ t σ t dw t, 0 measures the gains realized by the trading strategy over the period [ 0, T ]. As t goes to zero, X converges to X. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 456 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 458 Trading and the Ito Integral Consider an Ito process ds t = µ t dt + σ t dw t. S t is the vector of security prices at time t. Let φ t be a trading strategy denoting the quantity of each type of security held at time t. Hence the stochastic process φ t S t is the value of the portfolio φ t at time t. φ t ds t φ t (µ t dt + σ t dw t ) represents the change in the value from security price changes occurring at time t. Ito s Lemma A smooth function of an Ito process is itself an Ito process. Theorem 16 Suppose f : R R is twice continuously differentiable and dx = a t dt + b t dw. Then f(x) is the Ito process, for t 0. f(x t ) = f(x 0 ) + + 1 2 t 0 t 0 f (X s ) a s ds + f (X s ) b 2 s ds t 0 f (X s ) b s dw 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 457 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 459

Ito s Lemma (continued) In differential form, Ito s lemma becomes df(x) = f (X) a dt + f (X) b dw + 1 2 f (X) b 2 dt. (50) Compared with calculus, the interesting part is the third term on the right-hand side. A convenient formulation of Ito s lemma is df(x) = f (X) dx + 1 2 f (X)(dX) 2. Ito s Lemma (continued) Theorem 17 (Higher-Dimensional Ito s Lemma) Let W 1, W 2,..., W n be independent Wiener processes and X (X 1, X 2,..., X m ) be a vector process. Suppose f : R m R is twice continuously differentiable and X i is an Ito process with dx i = a i dt + n j=1 b ij dw j. Then df(x) is an Ito process with the differential, df(x) = m f i (X) dx i + 1 2 i=1 m i=1 k=1 where f i f/ x i and f ik 2 f/ x i x k. m f ik (X) dx i dx k, 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 460 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 462 Ito s Lemma (continued) We are supposed to multiply out (dx) 2 = (a dt + b dw) 2 symbolically according to dw dt dw dt 0 dt 0 0 The (dw) 2 = dt entry is justified by a known result. This form is easy to remember because of its similarity to the Taylor expansion. Ito s Lemma (continued) The multiplication table for Theorem 17 is in which dw i dt dw k δ ik dt 0 dt 0 0 1 if i = k, δ ik = 0 otherwise. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 461 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 463

Ito s Lemma (continued) Theorem 18 (Alternative Ito s Lemma) Let W 1, W 2,..., W m be Wiener processes and X (X 1, X 2,..., X m ) be a vector process. Suppose f : R m R is twice continuously differentiable and X i is an Ito process with dx i = a i dt + b i dw i. Then df(x) is the following Ito process, df(x) = m f i (X) dx i + 1 2 i=1 m i=1 k=1 m f ik (X) dx i dx k. Geometric Brownian Motion Consider the geometric Brownian motion process Y (t) e X(t) X(t) is a (µ, σ) Brownian motion. Hence dx = µ dt + σ dw by Eq. (45) on p. 429. As Y/ X = Y and 2 Y/ X 2 = Y, Ito s formula (50) on p. 460 implies dy = Y dx + (1/2) Y (dx) 2 = Y (µ dt + σ dw) + (1/2) Y (µ dt + σ dw) 2 = Y (µ dt + σ dw) + (1/2) Y σ 2 dt. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 464 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 466 Ito s Lemma (concluded) The multiplication table for Theorem 18 is dw i dt dw k ρ ik dt 0 dt 0 0 Here, ρ ik denotes the correlation between dw i and dw k. Hence Geometric Brownian Motion (concluded) dy Y = ( µ + σ 2 /2 ) dt + σ dw. The annualized instantaneous rate of return is µ + σ 2 /2 not µ. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 465 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 467

Product of Geometric Brownian Motion Processes Let dy/y = a dt + b dw Y, dz/z = f dt + g dw Z. Consider the Ito process U Y Z. Apply Ito s lemma (Theorem 18 on p. 464): du = Z dy + Y dz + dy dz = ZY (a dt + b dw Y ) + Y Z(f dt + g dw Z ) +Y Z(a dt + b dw Y )(f dt + g dw Z ) = U(a + f + bgρ) dt + UbdW Y + Ug dw Z. Product of Geometric Brownian Motion Processes (concluded) lnu is Brownian motion with a mean equal to the sum of the means of ln Y and ln Z. This holds even if Y and Z are correlated. Finally, ln Y and ln Z have correlation ρ. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 468 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 470 Product of Geometric Brownian Motion Processes (continued) The product of two (or more) correlated geometric Brownian motion processes thus remains geometric Brownian motion. Note that Y = exp [( a b 2 /2 ) dt + b dw Y ], Z = exp [( f g 2 /2 ) dt + g dw Z ], U = exp [ ( a + f ( b 2 + g 2) /2 ) dt + b dw Y + g dw Z ]. Quotients of Geometric Brownian Motion Processes Suppose Y and Z are drawn from p. 468. Let U Y/Z. We now show that du U = (a f + g2 bgρ) dt + b dw Y g dw Z. Keep in mind that dw Y and dw Z have correlation ρ. (51) 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 469 c 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 471

Quotients of Geometric Brownian Motion Processes (concluded) The multidimensional Ito s lemma (Theorem 18 on p. 464) can be employed to show that du = (1/Z) dy (Y/Z 2 ) dz (1/Z 2 ) dy dz + (Y/Z 3 ) (dz) 2 = (1/Z)(aY dt + by dw Y ) (Y/Z 2 )(fz dt + gz dw Z ) (1/Z 2 )(bgy Zρ dt) + (Y/Z 3 )(g 2 Z 2 dt) = U(adt + b dw Y ) U(f dt + g dw Z ) U(bgρ dt) + U(g 2 dt) = U(a f + g 2 bgρ) dt + Ub dw Y Ug dw Z. 2006 Prof. Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, National Taiwan University Page 472