GREAT SOUTH ROAD INTERSECTION

Similar documents
Newmont Boddington Gold Pty Ltd

GLNG PROJECT - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

NBG LOM Extension Project EPBC 2012/6370 Annual Compliance Summary Report June 2017

Expansion of Mine Waste Rock Dump, Talison Lithium Greenbushes Operation, EPBC Annual Compliance Summary Report September 2017

Reforms to Victoria s native vegetation permitted clearing regulations

APPENDIX 1 PROSPECTUS STATEWIDE UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK INSTRUMENT FOR NORTH DAKOTA. North Central Mitigation, LLC PO Box 2009 Sioux Falls, SD 57101

In-Lieu Fee Program Instrument Outline For Proposed In-Lieu Fee Programs in the States of Kansas and Missouri

CP25. No. 25 SALT Open Space and Associated Car Parking

Report. Banksia Woodland Rehabilitation - Age 7

INTERAGENCY COORDINATION AGREEMENT ON WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING WITHIN THE REGULATORY BOUNDARIES OF CHICAGO DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS January 1997

FURTHER TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #13/11 To be held on Friday, February 3, 2012

EAST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HCP / NCCP MITIGATION FEE AUDIT DRAFT REPORT AND NEXUS STUDY. Prepared For: Prepared By:

WALLS BAY. Esplanade Reserve 2012 DRAFT Management Plan. Following Community Board 18 April 2012 and after seeking views of Ngati Manu

Tri-State Montrose-Nucla-Cahone Transmission Line Improvement Project. Plan of Development

Bushfire risk assessment process for planning and the elements of BAL Assessments. Chris Wyborn General Manager Education & Bushfire Services

September 2014 Pagham Neighbourhood Plan

Barry Island and Docks (2)

Interagency Regulatory Guide

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership and Enbridge Pipelines (Southern Lights) L.L.C. Routing Permit for a Crude Oil Pipeline. Alberta Clipper Project

Green Budget Coalition:

The Impact of Biodiversity Offsets on Protected Areas. Leon Bennun BBOP webinar, 30 July 2015

Strategic Flood Risk Management

Porthcawl to Sker Point (7)

Decision by Richard Dent, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers

CERTIFICATE OC-56. IN THE MATTER OF the National Energy Board Act (NEB Act) and the regulations made thereunder; and

Request for Proposals Phase II South Bachelor Island Wetland Reconnection and Habitat Enhancement Project. Proposals are due March 14 th, 2019 by 4pm

Conservation Commission Procedures Standard Flow Chart - NOT

RISK AND OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT GUIDE RISK CRITERIA

CHAPTER 4. REGULATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District FLOOD CONTROL ZONE 5 ADVISORY BOARD MAY 15, 2014 STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (#0001) Between

Inverurie and Kintore (Potentially Vulnerable Area 06/13) Local Plan District Local authority Main catchment North East Aberdeenshire Council River Do

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2017] NZHC 980

ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL DECISION PROFFERED PERMIT ED LEWIS LLC. FILE NUMBER JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT MARCH 11, 2009

Ecological Monitoring Committee for the Lower Athabasca. Annual Report

CEQA Checklist for School Districts

DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION OCTOBER 7, 2014

Florida Senate SB 718 By Senator Sebesta

Wetlands Board Hearing Procedures

BIOFIN Thailand Financial Needs Assessment Report on Financing needs for biodiversity conservation in Thailand

Experimental Economic Evaluation of Offset Design Options for Alberta: A Summary of Results and Policy Recommendations

AN INTRODUCTION TO CONSERVATION AND RECLAMATION AT ALBERTA S MINEABLE OIL SANDS. Tanya Richens, P.Ag.

Proposed Changes to the National Energy Board Electricity Regulations 1

Transportation Infrastructure Investments and Consequences for Wildlife - A Review of Sub-Saharan Africa -

Frequently Asked Questions: About the World Heritage Convention and Australia s Great Barrier Reef

Report to: Development Services Committee Date: June 26, 2017

Bone Bolango, Indonesia

Nairn East and Auldearn (Potentially Vulnerable Area 05/08) Local Planning District Local authority Main catchment Findhorn, Nairn and Speyside The Hi

P art B 4 NATURAL HAZARDS. Natural Hazards ISSUE 1. River Flooding

Policy Title: Historic Downtown Patio Policy

Planning and Urban Management (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2007 SAMOA

BURNCO AGGREGATE PROJECT SCHEDULE B TABLE OF CONDITIONS FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE

FISHERIES MEASURES FOR MARINE NATURA 2000 SITES A consistent approach to requests for fisheries management measures under the Common Fisheries Policy

Vulnerability and Risk Assessment for the PFRA in Ireland

DAEN SUBJECT: South San Francisco Bay Shoreline, Santa Clara County, California

Hornsby/Ku-ring-gai Bush Fire Management Committee. Bush Fire Risk Management Plan

Review of the EIA for the Proposed Highway 2000 North South Link: Moneague to Ocho Rios Highway Construction Project Jamaica.

THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL COASTAL HAZARDS POLICY

Nairn Central (Potentially Vulnerable Area 01/18) Local authority Main catchment The Highland Council Moray coastal Background This Potentially Vulner

Puyallup Shoreline Master Program FINAL, JAN

ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANS

Greater Manchester Natural Capital Investment Plan

Public Notice. Number: CESWF-12-MITB Activity: Fort Worth District Mitigation Banks Date: June 27, 2016

Habitat Banking the in the EU: Demand, Supply and Design Elements

an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

GUIDELINES FOR THE ECOLABELLING OF FISH AND FISHERY PRODUCTS FROM MARINE CAPTURE FISHERIES

DRAFT STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCREENING REPORT. Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan for Flood Risk Management ( )

Flood Risk Management Plan for the NORTH WESTERN River Basin (UoM01)

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

ARTICLE 2 ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

Moving Policy and Practice from Flood and Coastal Storm Damage Reduction to Risk Management

Flood Risk. How do we manage flood risks? Built Form. Components of Flood Risk. Consequence of a flood. Chance of a flood

Combined Financial Statements June 30, 2012

Between the Western Sydney Parklands Trust (the Trust) (LAND OWNER) and

Chapter 4. Environment Impact Assessment. Introduction. ACT legislation. Assessment of strategic level planning. Assessment of development proposals

Adapting to. and Flooding. Report on a 2014 Survey of Waterford Residents. George Perkins Marsh Institute/Clark University and The Nature Conservancy

WV Streams and Wetlands March 3, 2010

REGIONAL EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PURPOSE 3.0 DEFINITIONS. Edmonton Metropolitan Region Planning Toolkit

Spinifex Ridge Molybdenum Project

LAND DEGRADATION NEUTRALITY FUND An innovative fund project dedicated to sustainable land use

Artesian bore pressure

A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICE IN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIA

Palu, Indonesia. Local progress report on the implementation of the 10 Essentials for Making Cities Resilient ( )

WELSH GOVERNMENT INQUIRY DOCUMENT

OUTPUT PLAN. Between the Minister of Conservation and Director-General of Conservation FOR THE YEAR 1 JULY JUNE 2016.

BUSHFIRE MANAGEMENT AREA PLAN

an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND TOURISM

HAWICK FLOOD PROTECTION SCHEME. 21 December Report by Service Director Assets & Infrastructure SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL

Warrego Energy PTY Ltd West Erregulla Exploration Program EPBC 2013/7054 Annual Report December 2016

Compliance report. Byerwen Coal Project EPBC 2010/5778. Byerwen Coal Project, Queensland EPBC 2010/ December 2016 to 8 December 2017

Combined Financial Statements June 30, 2014

3.07 Ontario Parks Program

GOAL 1: Protect coastal resources and human life and limit public expenditures in areas that are subject to destruction by natural disasters..

November 2016 Revision

Oban (Potentially Vulnerable Area 01/31) Local authority Main catchment Argyll and Bute Council Knapdale coastal Background This Potentially Vulnerabl

MEMO Independent Assessment of IDB s Background Information for the FCPF Common Approach to Environmental and Social Safeguards

Chapter 5 Floodplain Management

Upper Tukituki Flood Control Scheme. Asset Management Plan. October 2017 HBRC Plan Number 4559 HBRC Report Number AM 15-04

Transcription:

TECHNICAL REPORT 16 ECOLOGICAL IMPACT SUPPLEMENTARY ASSESSMENT GREAT SOUTH ROAD INTERSECTION DECEMBER 2016

Quality Assurance Statement Prepared by Reviewed by Shona Myers Katherine Muchna Shona Myers Approved for release Patrick Kelly (EWL Alliance Manager) Revision schedule Rev. N o Date Description Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 0 December 2016 Final Lodgement for Shona Myers Katherine Muchna Shona Myers Patrick Kelly Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Myers Ecology and Boffa Miskell on the specific instructions of our Client. It is solely for our Client s use for the purpose for which it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. Any use or reliance by any person contrary to the above, to which East West Link Alliance has not given its prior written consent, is at that person's own risk. December 2016 Revision 0 i

Executive Summary This report assesses the terrestrial ecological effects of a revised design of the Great South Road Intersection that includes impacts on the northern edge of Anns Creek East. The revised design is a grade separated intersection of EWL/ Great South Road/ Sylvia Park Road and viaducts through Anns Creek East. The proposed viaducts have been designed to be located within the more modified northern edge of the creek which contains weed species, native plantings and areas of fill. However, construction of the viaducts, including access for temporary staging and location of construction works in the eastern end of Anns Creek will result in significant ecological effects, including loss of potential lizard habitat. Anns Creek East contains sensitive and unique ecological values with lava shrubland habitats, threatened plant habitats and gradients between mangroves to saltmarsh to freshwater wetland. Construction of the viaducts, as well as the temporary staging structures, and construction works, will result in direct loss of habitats across the northern and eastern sections of Anns Creek East. The construction footprint of the revised design will adversely affect a total of approximately 2,340m 2 of lava shrubland, 21% of the shrubland ecosystem in Anns Creek East. It will also adversely affect 95% of the raupo reedland (1,160m 2 ), 37% of the glasswort - bachelors button herbfield (1,14 0m 2 ), 9% of mangrove scrub and forest (2,070m 2 ), and 0.3% of marsh clubrush habitat (4m 2 ). Native plantings and exotic dominated areas will also be affected. A total of 9,599m 2 (18%) of vegetation communities in Anns Creek East will be adversely affected by the Great South Road intersection and the viaducts. The construction footprint of the Project will adversely affect a total of approximately 15,910m 2 of moderate quality lizard habitat in Anns Creek East, comprising 7,520m 2 permanent habitat loss (under the road footprint) and 8,380m 2 temporary habitat loss (areas that will be cleared and then replanted as ecological mitigation). The revised design of viaduct structures have a much wider footprint through Anns Creek East compared to the single viaduct structure associated with the previous at grade design of the Great South Road intersection. Once completed the structures will shade the remaining vegetation beneath and near them. While there are gaps between the bridge structures which will allow moisture through, the overall footprint is wider than a single structure and will shade significantly more vegetation. In order to mitigate for these adverse effects it is recommended that: The long term permanent protection of Anns Creek East should be provided for; A management plan should be developed detailing a programme of conservation management and weed control to be undertaken in Anns Creek East; and Restoration of existing lava shrubland ecosystems and weed control should be undertaken in Anns Creek West and Anns Creek Estuary. The revised design will result in the loss of a greater proportion of moderate quality lizard habitat compared to the single viaduct structure associated with the previous at grade design of the Great South Road intersection. Mitigation for the potential effects on lizards are described in Section 2.7.2 of Technical Report 16. Proposed mitigation includes lizard salvage and relocation, identifying opportunities to create, enhance and connect lizard habitats and development of a site suitable to release lizards salvaged during vegetation clearance within the mitigation and landscape planting areas. The proposed mitigation is sufficient to address the permanent and temporary loss of potential lizard habitat. The nature and quantum of mitigation will be reviewed following an intensive survey for lizards in January 2017. December 2016 Revision 0 ii

Contents Executive Summary... ii 1 Introduction... 1 1.1 Purpose and scope of supplementary assessment... 1 1.2 Revised Great South Road Intersection... 1 2 Assessment Methodology and Existing Environment... 2 2.1 Assessment Methodology... 2 2.2 Existing Environment... 2 3 Assessment of Effects... 2 3.1 Predicted Project Terrestrial Ecology Effects... 2 4 Recommended Mitigation... 8 5 Conclusion... 9 December 2016 Revision 0 iii

1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and scope of supplementary assessment The purpose of this Technical Report 16 Terrestrial Ecology Supplementary Assessment is to assess the terrestrial and herpetofauna effects associated with the revised design of the East West Link (EWL)/Great South Road/Sylvia Park Road intersection and viaducts through Anns Creek East. The original Technical Report 16 Ecological Impact Assessment was completed in November 2016. Engagement with stakeholders and the wider community has continued in parallel, including design review in response to matters raised. As a progression of the work to date, the design of the EWL/Great South Road/Sylvia Park Road intersection has been revised from the at grade design originally proposed, to a grade separated design. Grade separation of the east west through movements at this intersection will provide improved reliability and future resilience. This supplementary assessment describes the potential and actual ecological effects associated with construction and operation of the revised intersection design at Great South Road. The assessment considers whether the type or scale of effects on the existing environment have changed as a result of the revised design and where necessary recommends additional management and mitigation measures. This supplementary assessment should be read in conjunction with Technical Report 16. Where this assessment supersedes and/or updates information in Technical Report 16, this has been expressly noted. This supplementary assessment forms part of the suite of technical reports that inform the Assessment of Effects on the Environment (AEE) and supports the Notice of Requirement for a new designation, alteration to an existing designation, and resource consent applications for the Project. 1.2 Revised Great South Road Intersection The revised intersection design at Great South Road is described in Section 6 of the AEE. Key features of the revised intersection design include: Extending the Anns Creek viaduct by about 330m over Great South Road. The viaduct would grade down to Sylvia Park Road, approximately 200m east of Great South Road. Altered through movements and connections to local roads at the intersection Through movements on EWL would occur on the elevated structure above Great South Road Movements to and from EWL to Sylvia Park Road and Great South Road would be at grade providing connectivity to the local street network North and south movements on Great South Road would remain unchanged, passing under the elevated EWL structure. A grade separated pedestrian and cycle crossing for east west movements on the southern side of the Anns Creek viaduct. Changes to the EWL/Hugo Johnston Drive intersection. Associated urban design and landscape treatments. December 2016 Revision 0 1

The revised intersection design is hereafter referred to in this supplementary assessment as the revised intersection design at Great South Road, or the revised design. The previously proposed layout (as assessed in Technical Report 16) is referred to as the at grade intersection design at Great South Road, or the at grade design. The geographical extent of the Project assessed in this supplementary assessment report is from Hugo Johnston Drive to Mt Wellington Highway. 2 Assessment Methodology and Existing Environment 2.1 Assessment Methodology The assessment methodology for the assessment of ecological values and effects on lizard habitat are set out in Technical Report 16. In addition two further actions have been undertaken to prepare this supplementary assessment. Additional site visits were undertaken in November 2016 to map with greater accuracy, using GPS technology, the location of the highest value lava and lava shrubland areas. The resulting plan will be used to guide location of piers during detailed design. In addition two 10 x 10 metre permanent shrubland vegetation plots were placed in the lava shrubland ecosystems in Anns Creek East to measure vegetation structure and composition. One was placed in the central lava flow and one in the north western lava flow shrubland vegetation. They are each marked with a GPS point. These plots will enable monitoring of vegetation changes over time, and of mitigation including weed control. 2.2 Existing Environment The existing environment, in particular in relation to the ecological values in Anns Creek East, is outlined in detail in Technical Report 16. 3 Assessment of Effects 3.1 Predicted Project Terrestrial Ecology Effects 3.1.1 Terrestrial Ecology Terrestrial ecology effects within each sector Sector 3 - Anns Creek This report assesses the terrestrial ecological effects of a revised design of the Great South Road intersection that includes impacts on the northern edge of Anns Creek East. This revised design is a grade separated intersection of EWL/Great South Road/Sylvia Park Road and viaducts through Anns Creek East. A single structure raised viaduct will be constructed across the mangroves in Anns Creek Estuary (SEA-M1 and M2), and across the northern edge of Anns Creek West (through the Southdown Co-Generation Plant). December 2016 Revision 0 2

The single structure is approximately 30 metres wide. The terrestrial ecological effects of this part of the route are described in Technical Report 16. The revised viaduct design at Anns Creek East is wider and incorporates three bridge structures across the northern edge of Anns Creek East (SEA-T-5309) through to Great South Road/Sylvia Park Road. The total footprint of the proposed viaducts across the northern part of Anns Creek East varies from over 40 metres wide (at the western end of Anns Creek East) to over 65 metres wide at the widest point (at the eastern end). The majority of the footprint of the proposed viaducts through the area of Anns Creek East containing lava shrubland and saltmarsh communities is between 55 metres wide to over 60 metres wide. There are gaps (approx. 5m) between the three viaduct structures. Pier structures adversely affecting vegetation in Anns Creek East, include eight piers within the main viaduct structure, four in the southern off ramp structure, and four within the northern off ramp bridge structure (Drawing Number AEE-C-207 to 209 and AEE-C- 285,286,287,288). Significantly more pier structures are needed for construction of the grade separated design than the previously proposed at grade design of the Great South Road intersection. There is a pedestrian walkway and cycleway on the southern edge of the grade separated bridge design. The construction of the viaducts will be undertaken using a temporary staging structure with bored pile supports. The temporary staging structure will provide access for pile and pier construction. Access for temporary staging will be required from the northern edges of Anns Creek East. The eastern end of Anns Creek East is consented for reclamation by TR Group. This area is identified as being within the limit of construction works for the project (Drawing Number AEE-AL-108). A pedestrian walkway structure is proposed for this area of Anns Creek East, beside Great South Road. The adverse ecological effects of construction works in the eastern end of Anns Creek are outlined in detail in Technical Report 16. Ecological effects Anns Creek East Construction of the revised design, including access for temporary staging and location of construction works in the eastern end of Anns Creek will result in significant ecological effects. Anns Creek East contains sensitive and unique ecological values with lava shrubland habitats, threatened plant habitats and gradients between mangroves to saltmarsh to freshwater wetland. Construction of the proposed viaduct, as well as the temporary staging structures, and construction works, will result in direct loss of habitats across the northern and eastern sections of Anns Creek East. The viaduct structures have a much wider footprint through Anns Creek East compared to the single viaduct structure associated with the previous at grade design of the Great South Road intersection. Once completed the structures will shade the remaining vegetation beneath and near them. While there are gaps between the bridge structures which will allow moisture through, the overall footprint is wider than a single structure and will shade significantly more vegetation. The proposed viaducts have been designed to be located within the more modified northern edges of the creek which contain weed species, native plantings and areas of fill. Effects on the lava flows in the southern and central section of the creek will be avoided and minimised. This central lava flow which contains intact areas of natural lava shrubland habitat has been avoided. We recommend later in this report that construction activity within this southern and central portion of Anns Creek is expressly restricted as a formal mitigation measure. December 2016 Revision 0 3

The viaducts, however, will result in significant adverse effects and loss of the lava shrubland ecosystems on the north-eastern lava flow. The structures will also result in loss of raupo wetland and saltmarsh ecosystems. The location of the construction works will destroy saline and freshwater ecosystems in the eastern end of the creek. The effects of construction of the viaducts will be significant. Over the years Anns Creek East has been subject to the impacts of existing infrastructure and industrial development and the Project will add further cumulative effects to these historic effects. Vegetation types within the construction footprint of the revised design that will be adversely affected are identified in Table 1. December 2016 Revision 0 4

Table 1: Vegetation Types in Anns Creek East Adversely Affected by Great South Rd Intersection and Viaducts Vegetation Types Total area of vegetation type within Anns Creek East (m 2 ) Area of vegetation type in Anns Creek East affected by Great South Road intersection design and designation boundary to north 11 Brush wattle pampas shrubland 1049 367 35.0% Marsh clubrush - tall fescue reedland 1,333 0 0 Marsh clubrush reedland 1,456 4 0.3% Tall fescue grassland 1,448 0 0 Pampas tussockland 3,196 0 0 Mangrove scrub and forest 22,803 2,070 9.1% Glasswort - bachelors button herbfield 3,088 1,140 37.0% Raupo reedland 1,215 1,160 95.5% Oioi saltmarsh 332 0 0 Lava shrubland 11,176 2,340 20.9% Native Plantings 1,603 1,509 94.1% Brush wattle - gorse weedfield 2,787 1,010 36.2% Percentage of total area of vegetation type in Anns Creek East affected by Great South Road intersection design 1 We have assumed that all vegetation from the northern extent of the alignment to the northern extent of the designation, including the vegetation underneath the viaducts, is removed during construction. We have also assumed that all vegetation from the southern extent of the alignment to the southern boundary of the designation is retained (within Anns Creek East only). It is likely that with careful placement of piers and construction works not all of the vegetation will be removed from underneath the viaducts, however, there will be fragmentation and shading of this vegetation which will adversely affect its viability. December 2016 Revision 0 5

The construction footprint for the revised design will adversely affect a total of approximately 2,340m 2 of lava shrubland, 21% of the shrubland ecosystem in Anns Creek East. It will also adversely affect 95% of the raupo reedland (1,160m 2 ), 37% of the glasswort - bachelors button herbfield (1,140m 2 ), 9% of mangrove scrub and forest (2,070m 2 ), and 0.3% of marsh clubrush habitat (4m 2 ) (Table 1). Native plantings and exotic dominated areas will also be affected. In comparison with a single at-grade viaduct structure associated with the previous at grade design of the Great South Road intersection, the revised design will adversely affect additional areas of vegetation due to the extra width. The revised structure will adversely affect approximately 19% (370m 2 ) more lava shrubland, 29.7% ( 260m 2 ) more glasswort-bachelors button herbfield, and 47% ( 660m 2 ) more mangrove scrub and forest, than a single viaduct structure. A total of 9,600m 2 (18%) of vegetation communities in Anns Creek East will be adversely affected by the Great South Road intersection design and viaducts through Anns Creek East. In addition construction works proposed within the eastern end of the creek (described in Technical Report 16) will result in the loss of approximately 16% of vegetation communities in Anns Creek East. The Great South Road intersection design and viaducts, together with the construction works in the eastern end of Anns Creek, will adversely affect a total of 34% of the vegetation communities in Anns Creek East. Adverse effects will include the following: Disturbance and loss of lava shrubland ecosystems; Loss of freshwater raupo wetland, mangrove and saltmeadow communities; Disturbance and loss of ecological sequences from terrestrial to saline to freshwater; Loss of and impacts on a naturally uncommon ecosystem type. Staging and construction of the bridge piers will result in direct loss of vegetation and habitats within the immediate area of disturbance. An exclusion plan delineating the highest value lava and lava shrubland areas is being developed to guide location of piers during detailed design. As a result of this work the location of piers will be designed to avoid the most sensitive areas of lava shrubland. 3.1.2 Terrestrial ecology effects of the project Effects on terrestrial ecology in Anns Creek and Mangere Inlet include fragmentation, reduction in the size and extent of ecosystems, disruption of connections, potential loss of rare or threatened species, loss or degradation of originally rare ecosystems, cumulative loss, and damage to ecological mosaics or sequences. The revised design will result in a wider footprint and greater adverse ecological effects on Anns Creek East in comparison with the at grade design. The revised design will result in loss of a greater proportion of moderate quality lizard habitat in comparison with the at grade design. The lizard habitats in Anns Creek East comprise native plantings, brush wattlepampas shrubland, and brush wattle-gorse weedfield with basalt outcrops and scattered debris. Lizard habitats are described in Sections 2.4.2.3 and 2.4.2.4 of Technical Report 16. Fragmentation, reduction in size and extent of ecosystems In Sector 3, the grade separated design through Anns Creek East will result in loss and adverse impacts on much of the north-eastern lava flow. It will also result in loss of the raupo wetland and loss in extent and fragmentation of the mosaic of vegetation communities (lava shrubland, saltmarsh and freshwater wetland). December 2016 Revision 0 6

Fragmentation, disruption of ecological connections, loss or damage to ecological mosaics and sequences Construction of the Anns Creek viaducts and the construction yard in Anns Creek East will result in adverse effects on lava shrubland, mangrove, saltmarsh and freshwater wetland communities, and fragmentation and disturbance of the ecological sequences and connections and the mosaic of habitats in Anns Creek East. Changes resulting in increase in pests There are significant weed issues throughout many parts of the project area. There has been restoration planting undertaken on the edges of Anns Creek East within the TR Group land, however, weed species are invading this area. There are several weed species including moth plant, pampas, smilax, gorse, and Chinese privet that are common on the lava flows of Anns Creek East. Further disturbance in this area will result in the spread of weeds. There is a significant opportunity to undertake ecological restoration and rehabilitation through weed control and ongoing maintenance in Anns Creek East. Loss of rare, Threatened species, population, habitat The position of the grade separation structures through Anns Creek East has been designed to minimise effects on the lava shrublands. The location has been designed to concentrate effects on the degraded edges dominated by weed species and native plantings. The central lava flow that contains significant native lava shrubland communities and habitat for threatened fern and Geranium spp. is avoided. Construction of the viaducts through Anns Creek East however will result in the loss of 2,340m 2 of lava shrubland habitat, and the footprint is within the lava flows that provide habitat for native shrubs such as akeake, Astelia banksii, Coprosma crassifolia, Coprosma propinqua (regionally vulnerable) and Threatened herb and fern species including Pellaea falcata (at risk, declining), and Geranium solanderi (at risk declining). Construction will result in loss of lava shrubland ecosystems. Loss or degradation of originally rare ecosystems The lava shrublands in Anns Creek and in Mangere Inlet are an originally rare/naturally uncommon ecosystem type (Williams et al. 2007). Construction of the viaducts will result in a reduction in the extent of lava shrublands in Anns Creek through shading from the three viaduct structures, location of the piers and construction staging. While gaps between structures will allow light and moisture through, the width of structures and shading will have significant adverse effects on vegetation communities. The viaducts have been designed to avoid and minimise adverse effects on the lava flows characterised by native shrubs, grasses, ferns and herbs. Construction, however, will result in loss of lava shrublands on the north-eastern lava flow and 2,340m 2 of the high value lava shrublands in Anns Creek will be adversely affected by the footprint of the alignment. This north-eastern lava flow contains gorse and native plantings however there are native dominated plant communities with akeake, Coprosma crassifolia and Astelia banksii and native ferns present on the lava flow which will be affected by construction and ongoing shading. Cumulative loss or degradation of ecosystems Construction of the viaducts, together with works in the eastern end of Anns Creek East, will result in cumulative loss and degradation of lava shrubland, mangrove, saltmarsh and freshwater habitats by adding to the effects of past reclamation and development in Anns Creek East. December 2016 Revision 0 7

Modification of the viability or value of indigenous vegetation or habitats Construction through Anns Creek East will damage ecological communities and modify the value and viability of the mosaic of ecosystem types in Anns Creek East. The revised design, as well as works in the eastern corner, will result in a significant proportion of Anns Creek East being lost to development. This will impact on the viability and ecological value of the area. Construction will open areas to weed invasion. Shading from the viaduct structures will impact on shrubland ecosystems adapted to high light conditions. There are a significant number of weed species on the edges of the lava flows in Anns Creek East and these have the potential to spread. There is an opportunity for restoration and better conservation management in the area if it was provided permanent protection, and an ongoing conservation management programme. 3.1.3 Herpetofauna effects The potential construction and operational effects on lizards include direct loss of lizard habitat within the project area; displacement to unsuitable surrounding habitat; and lizard mortality during vegetation clearance and site works. The works within Anns Creek East will include clearance of vegetation within parts of the construction area in Anns Creek East but outside the lava shrubland. We understand that conditions will be proposed so that within the lava shrubland there will be no permanent or temporary piers and intensive construction activities and vegetation clearance will be minimised. The remaining area, outside of the construction footprint will be revegetated and will include species and habitat elements suitable for lizard fauna. As such, this assessment of effects on lizards includes both permanent (under the road footprint, comprising 7,520 m 2 ) and temporary habitat loss (comprising 8,380 m 2 areas that will be cleared and then replanted as ecological mitigation). The assessment of ecological effects on lizards as a result of the Project, with the revised design of the Great South Road intersection, remains the same as outlined in Sections 2.5.3 and 2.6.2 of Technical Report 16. An assessment of effects in the specific location of Anns Creek East is not possible at this stage because of insufficient information about lizard presence and/or distribution and final construction footprints. Notwithstanding those constraints an assessment of potential effects was undertaken at the local population level. The magnitude of effect and the level of effect outlined in Technical Report 16 are the same for the revised design of the Great South Road intersection. An intensive survey for lizards will be undertaken in January 2017. 4 Recommended Mitigation Recommendations to avoid and minimise the effects of the revised design (including viaducts and grade separated structures at Great South Road) in Anns Creek East on terrestrial ecological values include the following: Construction of the Anns Creek East viaduct should be located as close as possible to the northern edges of Anns Creek East; Reduce the width of the project footprint by reducing the separation distance between bridge structures; Bridge piers have been placed to avoid and minimise adverse effects on sensitive lava shrubland vegetation. However, conditions should require that further refinement of this should be undertaken at the time of detailed design to avoid and minimise adverse effects on threatened or uncommon species; December 2016 Revision 0 8

Minimise to the greatest extent practicable construction activities and vegetation removal within the lava shrubland area underneath the proposed viaduct; Avoid construction activities and vegetation removal in the central and southern parts of Anns Creek East outside the construction footprint; Avoid construction works in the eastern end of Anns Creek (the area consented for development by TR Group); Provide for permanent protection for Anns Creek East and an ongoing conservation management programme for the area. Inclusion of the area in the eastern corner which is consented for development would result in a much more significant area of Anns Creek being protected. It would reduce cumulative effects on this area and prevent further loss; Develop a management plan and implement a conservation management programme, including weed control, threatened plant protection, and restoration of lava shrubland ecosystems (where these habitats are dominated by weed species) in Anns Creek East, Anns Creek Estuary and Anns Creek West. This could include removing fill on the northern edges of Anns Creek East to uncover lava flows; Monitoring of the effectiveness of lava shrubland restoration, threatened plant protection and weed control should be undertaken. Mitigation measures relating to the potential effects on lizards are described in Section 2.7.2 and Chapter 16 of Technical Report 16. Proposed mitigation includes lizard salvage and relocation, identifying oportunitues to create, enhance and connect lizard habitats (through both the ecological restoration / mitigation areas and the landscape revegetation proposed) and development of a site suitable to release lizards salvaged during vegetation clearance within the mitigation and landscape planting areas. Of these mitigation measures, salvage and relocation of lizards is the most important to reduce and mitigate effects on lizards. The proposed mitigation is sufficient to address the permanent and temporary loss of potential habitat for lizards, but the nature and quantum of mitigation will be reviewed following an intensive survey for lizards in January 2017. The habitats within Anns Creek East are dry and exposed and the only native species likely to be present are copper skinks (not threatened). Given that, the mitigat ion proposed (lizard salvage and habitat creation) is likely to exceed what would be required to mitigate habitat loss for copper skinks within Anns Creek East due to the revised design of the Great South Road intersection. 5 Conclusion The revised design through Anns Creek East will result in a wider structure than a single viaduct structure, more shading of vegetation, and significantly more pier structures. The proposed viaducts have been designed to be located within the more modified northern edges of the creek which contain weed species, native plantings and areas of fill. Pier structures will be designed to avoid high value lava shrubland. Effects on the lava flows in the southern and central section of the creek will be avoided and minimised. The viaducts will result in significant adverse effects and loss of the lava shrubland ecosystems on the northeastern lava flow, and loss of raupo wetland and saltmarsh ecosystems. A total of 9,600m 2 (18%) of vegetation communities in Anns Creek East will be adversely affected by the Great South Road intersection design. In comparison with a single at grade viaduct structure associated with the previous at grade design of the Great South Road intersection, the revised design will result in significantly greater loss of mangrove scrub and forest (47% more), lava shrubland (19.1% more), and glasswort bachelors button herbfield (29.7% more). December 2016 Revision 0 9

In order to mitigate for these adverse effects the long term permanent protection of Anns Creek East (including the area consented for development by TR Group) should be provided for. A management plan should be developed detailing a programme of conservation management and weed control to be undertaken. In addition restoration of existing lava shrubland ecosystems and weed control should be undertaken in Anns Creek West and Anns Creek Estuary. The assessment of effects on lizards and proposed mitigation as outlined in Technical Report 16 does not change with the revised design of the Great South Road intersection and mitigation is at least sufficient, if not providing an overall net benefit for lizard fauna by the provision of a larger, higher quality habitat. December 2016 Revision 0 10