State Universities Retirement System of Illinois

Similar documents
State Universities Retirement System of Illinois. GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions as of June 30, 2017

S TAT E U NIVERSITIES R ETIREMENT SYSTEM OF I L LINOIS

STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ILLINOIS

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois

October 8, Board of Trustees State Universities Retirement System of Illinois 1901 Fox Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820

S TAT E U NIVERSITIES R E T I REMENT SYSTEM OF I L L INOIS

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois. Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2018

November 6, Board of Trustees State Universities Retirement System of Illinois 1901 Fox Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820

Subject: Experience Review for the Years June 30, 2010, to June 30, 2014

Town of Scituate Retirement Plan for the Police Department Employees

Teachers Retirement System of the State of Illinois

Arizona PSPRS Pension Task Force

MINUTES. Trustee Mark Cozzi physically joined the meeting at 3:20 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

VILLAGE OF CARPENTERSVILLE CARPENTERSVILLE POLICE PENSION FUND. Actuarial Valuation Report. For the Year. Beginning January 1, 2016

Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System. Prepared as of June 30, 2014

ACTUARIAL. Online information, a permanent home, new program options SURS celebrated 50 years of service.

Firemen s Retirement System of St. Louis. Annual Actuarial Valuation as of October 1, 2017

Laborers & Retirement Board and Employees Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago

THE CITY OF CRANSTON FIRE AND POLICE DEPARTMENT PENSION PLANS. Actuarial Valuation Report July 1, 2017

ACTUARIAL SURS2015. Letter of Certification. Actuarial Report. Analysis of Funding. Tests of Financial Soundness

Re: Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2012 Bloomington Fire Department Relief Association Pension Fund

ST. JOHN S RIVER POWER PARK SYSTEM EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T O C T O B E R 1, 201 4

Re: Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2018 Bloomington Fire Department Relief Association Pension Fund

P O L I C E M E N S A N N U I T Y A N D B E N E F I T F U N D O F C H I C A G O

Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund)

Building a stronger fund. SURS net position at the end of FY 2017 was $20.7 billion, an increase of $1.8 billion or 9.7%.

June 19, Compute the City s recommended contribution rate for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2015.

GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT

Subject: Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Ending December 31, 2016

MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN APPENDIX TO THE ANNUAL ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT DECEMBER 31, 2016

March 26, The purpose of the valuation of the City of Eastpointe Employees Death Benefit Plan as of November 1, 2012 is to:

GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT

F I R E M E N S A N N U I T Y A N D B E N E F I T F U N D O F C H I C A G O ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T A S O F D E C E M B E R 3 1,

West Virginia Teachers Retirement System

Funding Basics of Retirement Programs

GASB STATEMENT NO. 68 REPORT

Correctional Employees Retirement Fund

Arkansas State Police Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2018

July 30, The Retirement Board City of Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System Taylor, Michigan

CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2008

ARKANSAS JUDICIAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM GASB STATEMENT NOS. 67 AND 68 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS

City of Brockton Contributory Retirement System

O A K L A N D C O U N T Y E M P L O Y E E S ' R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M

JULY 1, 2013 ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF THE NEW PENSION PLAN OF THE CITY OF CENTRAL FALLS

January 31, Retirement Board 40 Fountain Street, First Floor Providence, RI Dear Members of the Board:

Copyright 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

STATE POLICE RETIREMENT BENEFITS TRUST STATE OF RHODE ISLAND ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF J U N E 3 0, 201 6

Arkansas Judicial Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2017

University of Puerto Rico Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation Report

University of Puerto Rico Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation Valuation Report

February 27, The purpose of the annual actuarial valuation of the City of Auburn Hills Employee Pension Plan as of December 31, 2014, is to:

STATE POLICE RETIREMENT BENEFITS TRUST STATE OF RHODE ISLAND ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF J U N E 3 0, 201 5

FINANCIAL. Providing retirement, disability, death and survivor benefits as promised MEMBER FOCUSED SURS 2018

MPERS Supplemental Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2016

P O L I C E M E N S A N N U I T Y A N D B E N E F I T F U N D O F C H I C A G O A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T F O R T H E Y E A R E

F I R E A N D P O L I C E P E N S I O N A S S O C I A T I O N

Employes Retirement System of the City of Milwaukee

Dear Trustees of the Local Government Correctional Service Retirement Plan:

December 4, Minnesota State Retirement System Legislators Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:

STATE POLICE RETIREMENT BENEFITS TRUSTSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JUNE 30, 2017

Arkansas State Police Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions June 30, 2017

June 7, Dear Board Members:

M I N N E S O T A S T A T E R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M J U D G E S R E T I R E M E N T F U N D

GASB Statement No. 67 Report

sional skilled trained adept competent efficient experienced expert proficient qualified sharp skillful accomplished able

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

City of Grand Rapids Police and Fire Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions Measurement

Ohio Police & Fire. Pension Fund. Investigation of Demographic and Economic Experience. Conduent Human Resource Services. Five-Year Period from

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. The Police and Firemen s Retirement System of New Jersey

Conduent Human Resource Services. Employes Retirement System of the City of Milwaukee Actuarial Valuation Report

House Financial Institutions and Pensions Committee. HB 2448; Moving State Correctional Officers to KP&F

CITY OF BARTLETT, TENNESSEE RETIREMENT PLAN. Results of Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2016

CITY OF CLEARWATER EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JANUARY 1, 2016

CONTENTS. Introduction. Valuation Results. 1-2 Summary of Actuarial Valuation Results 3 Derivation of Experience Gain (Loss) 4-7 Comments and Analysis

City of Holyoke Retirement System Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2016

City of Clearwater Employees Pension Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2018 Annual Employer Contribution for the Fiscal Year Ending

C I T Y OF GRAND RAPIDS POLICE A ND FIRE R E T I REMENT SYSTEM G A S B S T A T E M E N T NOS. 6 7 A N D 6 8 A C C O U N T I N G A N D F I N A N C I A

Respectfully submitted,

Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund)

STATISTICAL. Financial Schedules. Statistical Analysis. Benefit Summary

GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT

Actuarial Section. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2013

CITY OF WOBURN CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Actuarial Valuation Report. January 1, 2007

TRADITIONAL PLAN MEMBER GUIDE S U R S STATE UNIVERSITIES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

Postretirement Benefit Valuation Report Under GASB 45 for Fiscal Year Ending October 31, 2010

April 29, Mr. Alfred Riverol Finance Director City Hall 6130 Sunset Drive South Miami, Florida 33143

PENSION BOARD CONSULTANTS, INC. Actuarial Report as of October 1, 2015

ST. PAUL TEACHERS RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION A CTUARIAL V ALUATION

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

City of Manchester Employees Contributory Retirement System GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions December

Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System

CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

VRS Overview. Presented to the IPMA-VA HR Director s Retreat. November 16, 2012 Robert P. Schultze, Director

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

S T A T E P O L I C E R E T I R E M E N T B E N E F I T S T R U S T S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R

City of Harrisburg Postemployment Benefits Plan Actuarial Valuation as of January 1, 2012 Table of Contents

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation General Employees Retirement System

San Diego City Employees Retirement System San Diego County Regional Airport Authority

CITY OF ALLEN PARK EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

November Minnesota State Retirement System State Patrol Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:

Transcription:

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois Pension Reform Studies HB 6258 December 20, 2012 Copyright 2012 GRS All rights reserved.

Opening Comments 2 This report contains one scenario for HB 6258 Effective date of July 1, 2013 Tier 1 benefit changes Increase in Tier 1 employee contribution rates of 2% of pay Establishes a Cash Balance Plan for new hires and Tier 2 employees (if they elect to opt in) Self Managed Plan (SMP) closed to new hires after effective date Current SMP members at the effective date remain in SMP under HB 6258 Establishes employer contributions (currently employers do not contribute) for 65 SURS employers Changes State s funding policy to normal cost plus 30-year level percentage of payroll amortization of the unfunded liability attributable to the cost of benefits prior to July 1, 2013 (100% funded in 2043) Establishes State and Employer Funding Enforcement

HB 6258 Changes 3 Tier 1 benefit changes Caps pensionable earnings at the Social Security Taxable Wage Base (SSTWB). Members with current pay in excess of the SSTWB will be grandfathered and have their pay capped at their current pay at the effective date. Increases normal retirement age for members retiring on or after July 1, 2013 Current retirement eligibility Any age with 30 years Age 60 with 8 years Age 62 with 5 years No change if age 45 or older at effective date 1 year delay if age 40-45 at effective date (31 years, 61/8, 63/5) 3 year delay if age 35-40 at effective date (33 years, 63/8, 65/5) 5 year delay if younger than age 35 (35 years, 65/8, 67/5) Delays also apply to early retirement eligibility (currently 55/8)

HB 6258 Changes Tier 1 benefit changes Automatic Annual Increases (AAI) in Annuity Impacts both current and future retirees Members with an annuity of $25,000 or less receive a 3% compounded AAI Members with an annuity of more than $25,000 receive a non-compounded AAI of $750. $25,000 cap does not increase in future years First increase is payable at the earlier of: January 1 following the attainment of age 67 January 1 following the 5 th anniversary of the annuity start date Current retirees will have their benefits frozen until eligibility conditions (i.e. January 1 following the earlier of age 67 and the 5 th anniversary of the annuity start date) are met Increase in employee contribution rate of 1% of payroll in FY 2014 and an additional 1% increase in FY 2015. Members will contribute 2% of pay additional beginning in FY 2015. Increased employee contributions are carved out of the money purchase benefit and Portable Plan lump sum calculations 4

HB 6258 Changes Cash Balance Plan Tier 2 members (may opt in) and new hires (mandatory, SMP no longer offered) 8% employee contribution (9.5% Police and Firefighters) 6.2% notional employer contribution Up to 1% of pay deducted from accounts and used to pay disability benefits Interest credit Floor crediting rate equal to the greater of the average 30-year Treasury Bond rate and 4% (assumed treasury rate); plus Additional credit if SURS 1 year and SURS 5 year average investment returns are both in excess of the 30-year Treasury bond rate (or 4%) equal to:» 2/3 of the excess of the SURS 1 year return over the assumed treasury rate Maximum crediting rate equal to 10% Interest stops accruing when member starts receiving an annuity payment under the plan 5

HB 6258 Changes Cash Balance Plan Benefits are annuitized at retirement Life annuity payable. May elect 50%, 75% or 100% survivor annuities as options. Annuitization factor based on assumed future investment returns equal to the average 30-year treasury bond yield over the 5 fiscal years prior to the calculation of the retirement annuity plus 200 basis points but not less than 4% nor more than 8% May begin collecting benefits at the later of age 59 ½ and date of termination 3% non-compounded (simple) AAI payable beginning the January 1 after the annuity start date. Refunds are equal to the amount of employee contributions only. No interest or employer contributions are payable. 6

HB 6258 Changes Employer Funding Requirement Employers begin to contribute to the System in fiscal year 2014 (currently employers do not make contributions) 65 current SURS employers Employers will contribute a rate of 0.5% of payroll beginning in FY 2014. The rate will increase by 0.5% of payroll each fiscal year until a total rate equal to employer normal cost is reached. Any normal cost not paid for by the employers during the phase in period will be paid for by the State. Employers will contribute an amount to amortize the unfunded liability attributable to the cost of benefits accrued on or after July 1, 2013. The unfunded liability is to be amortized as a level percentage of payroll over a 30-year open period. The System will maintain separate accounts for each employer. 7

Opening Comments Plan design changes apply to all Tier 1 members. Changes to Tier 1 benefits apply to all years of service. This is not an endorsement for or against changing benefits for current members. This is also not a comment on the contractual or constitutional implications of changing benefits for current members. It is for illustrative purposes only. 8

Opening Comments The results are compared against the baseline, where the baseline represents the 6/30/2012 actuarial valuation results. The items developed for comparison are all based on projected amounts through 2045, and include: 1. The total statutory contribution (excluding SMP contributions and any debt service); 2. The unfunded accrued liability; 3. The funded ratio; 4. The actuarial value of assets; 5. The actuarial accrued liability; 6. The employer normal cost; 7. The payment toward amortization of the unfunded accrued liability. 9

Key Results Key results A portion of the total cost is shifted from the State to the employers. Employers contribute about 1.5% of the total (State plus employer) contribution in fiscal year 2014 Employers contribute about 9.7% of the total contribution in fiscal year 2043 Compared to the baseline, there is a decrease in the total statutory contributions of about $21 billion through 2045 and an increase in the funded ratio in 2043 from 81% to 100%. The State contribution decreases by $27 billion Employer contributions increase by $6 billion Establishing a contribution requirement for the employers may create a Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) liability under Statements 67 and 68 for the individual employers 10

Key Assumptions 11 Key assumptions (used in the baseline under current provisions and/or Scenario 1 under HB 6258) CPI increase of 2.75% (Tier 2 COLA of 1.375%) Social Security Taxable Wage Base increases at 3.75% annually Total payroll increases at 3.75% annually Investment return assumption of 7.75% Same retirement, mortality, termination, disability and salary increase assumptions used in the actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2012 unless otherwise noted Accelerated retirement rates at first eligibility for Tier 1 members with delayed retirement under HB 6258 Contributions and benefits are based on pensionable (capped) payroll Payroll cap is $108,883 in 2012 for Tier 2 members (baseline) Payroll cap is equal to the greater of pay at the effective date and SSTWB for Tier 1 members. No payroll cap applies to the cash balance plan. (HB 6258) We have assumed that the total net normal cost will ultimately be transferred to the 65 SURS employers (HB 6258)

Key Assumptions 12 Key assumptions (used in the cash balance plan) 100% of Current Tier 2 members opt into the cash balance plan Cash balance assumed interest crediting rate of 6.50% Cash balance assumed annuitization factors based on an investment return rate of 6.00% and 3% simple COLA Members in the cash balance plan retire in accordance with the retirement rates used for current Tier 1 members beginning at age 60 5.2% notional employer contribution to member accounts. 1% assumed to be used for disability benefits. (Total employer rate of 6.2%.) 1% employer contribution for disability is assumed to be paid outside of the trust for purposes of this analysis. Therefore, actuarial value of assets and actuarial accrued liability do not include disability benefits. Total employer contribution does include assumed cost of disability benefits.

Scenario 1 HB 6258 ($ in Millions) Total Statutory Contribution (State and Employer) (excluding SMP and debt service) Unfunded Accrued Liability Funded Ratio Year Baseline Impact Change Baseline Impact Change Baseline Impact Change 2013 $ 1,399 $ 1,403 $ 4 $ 20,230 $ 15,371 $ (4,858) 41.2% 48.1% 6.9% 2014 $ 1,504 $ 1,170 $ (333) $ 20,338 $ 15,307 $ (5,032) 43.0% 49.7% 6.7% 2015 $ 1,577 $ 1,148 $ (429) $ 20,542 $ 15,420 $ (5,122) 44.4% 50.6% 6.3% 2016 $ 1,587 $ 1,165 $ (422) $ 21,130 $ 15,905 $ (5,226) 44.6% 50.4% 5.8% 2017 $ 1,613 $ 1,206 $ (408) $ 21,495 $ 16,144 $ (5,351) 45.3% 50.8% 5.5% 2018 $ 1,671 $ 1,234 $ (437) $ 21,819 $ 16,364 $ (5,455) 46.0% 51.3% 5.3% 2019 $ 1,713 $ 1,265 $ (447) $ 22,116 $ 16,561 $ (5,555) 46.7% 51.7% 5.0% 2020 $ 1,756 $ 1,298 $ (458) $ 22,383 $ 16,733 $ (5,650) 47.4% 52.2% 4.9% 2025 $ 1,980 $ 1,493 $ (486) $ 23,164 $ 17,072 $ (6,092) 50.4% 55.1% 4.6% 2030 $ 2,221 $ 1,747 $ (474) $ 22,719 $ 16,100 $ (6,619) 54.3% 60.5% 6.2% 2035 $ 2,521 $ 2,062 $ (459) $ 20,369 $ 12,951 $ (7,417) 60.4% 70.5% 10.1% 2040 $ 2,818 $ 2,443 $ (375) $ 15,016 $ 6,332 $ (8,684) 71.3% 86.9% 15.6% 2045 $ 3,164 $ 270 $ (2,894) $ 5,331 $ (65) $ (5,396) 90.0% 100.1% 10.1% Total Cont. Through 2045 $ 73,457 $ 54,573 $ (18,884) Present Value of Total Cont. $ 22,523 $ 17,307 $ (5,216) 13

Scenario 1 HB 6258 Total Net Normal Cost ($ in Millions) Portion to Amortize the UAL Total Statutory Contribution (State and Employer) (excluding SMP and debt service) Year Baseline Impact Change Baseline Impact Change Baseline Impact Change 2013 $ 416 $ 416 $ - $ 983 $ 987 $ 4 $ 1,399 $ 1,403 $ 4 2014 $ 409 $ 296 $ (113) $ 1,095 $ 874 $ (221) $ 1,504 $ 1,170 $ (333) 2015 $ 401 $ 260 $ (140) $ 1,177 $ 888 $ (289) $ 1,577 $ 1,148 $ (429) 2016 $ 392 $ 253 $ (139) $ 1,194 $ 912 $ (282) $ 1,587 $ 1,165 $ (422) 2017 $ 383 $ 245 $ (138) $ 1,230 $ 961 $ (269) $ 1,613 $ 1,206 $ (408) 2018 $ 375 $ 238 $ (137) $ 1,296 $ 997 $ (300) $ 1,671 $ 1,234 $ (437) 2019 $ 367 $ 231 $ (136) $ 1,345 $ 1,034 $ (311) $ 1,713 $ 1,265 $ (447) 2020 $ 360 $ 225 $ (135) $ 1,396 $ 1,073 $ (323) $ 1,756 $ 1,298 $ (458) 2025 $ 332 $ 205 $ (127) $ 1,647 $ 1,288 $ (359) $ 1,980 $ 1,493 $ (486) 2030 $ 316 $ 202 $ (113) $ 1,905 $ 1,545 $ (360) $ 2,221 $ 1,747 $ (474) 2035 $ 302 $ 213 $ (89) $ 2,219 $ 1,850 $ (369) $ 2,521 $ 2,062 $ (459) 2040 $ 296 $ 237 $ (59) $ 2,521 $ 2,205 $ (316) $ 2,818 $ 2,443 $ (375) 2045 $ 331 $ 270 $ (61) $ 2,834 $ - $ (2,834) $ 3,164 $ 270 $ (2,894) Total Through 2045 $ 11,013 $ 7,690 $ (3,322) $ 62,445 $ 46,883 $ (15,562) $ 73,457 $ 54,573 $ (18,884) Present Value of Total $ 4,211 $ 2,904 $ (1,307) $ 18,312 $ 14,403 $ (3,909) $ 22,523 $ 17,307 $ (5,216) 14

Scenario 1 HB 6258 ($ in Millions) Actuarial Value of Assets Actuarial Accrued Liability Unfunded Accrued Liability Year Baseline Impact Change Baseline Impact Change Baseline Impact Change 2013 $ 14,200 $ 14,200 $ - $ 34,430 $ 29,571 $ (4,858) $ 20,230 $ 15,371 $ (4,858) 2014 $ 15,346 $ 15,107 $ (239) $ 35,684 $ 30,413 $ (5,271) $ 20,338 $ 15,307 $ (5,032) 2015 $ 16,380 $ 15,825 $ (555) $ 36,921 $ 31,245 $ (5,677) $ 20,542 $ 15,420 $ (5,122) 2016 $ 16,999 $ 16,151 $ (848) $ 38,130 $ 32,056 $ (6,074) $ 21,130 $ 15,905 $ (5,226) 2017 $ 17,806 $ 16,700 $ (1,106) $ 39,302 $ 32,844 $ (6,458) $ 21,495 $ 16,144 $ (5,351) 2018 $ 18,608 $ 17,236 $ (1,373) $ 40,427 $ 33,600 $ (6,828) $ 21,819 $ 16,364 $ (5,455) 2019 $ 19,386 $ 17,762 $ (1,624) $ 41,502 $ 34,323 $ (7,179) $ 22,116 $ 16,561 $ (5,555) 2020 $ 20,137 $ 18,280 $ (1,857) $ 42,519 $ 35,012 $ (7,507) $ 22,383 $ 16,733 $ (5,650) 2025 $ 23,565 $ 20,914 $ (2,651) $ 46,729 $ 37,986 $ (8,743) $ 23,164 $ 17,072 $ (6,092) 2030 $ 26,949 $ 24,613 $ (2,336) $ 49,668 $ 40,713 $ (8,955) $ 22,719 $ 16,100 $ (6,619) 2035 $ 31,101 $ 30,960 $ (141) $ 51,470 $ 43,912 $ (7,558) $ 20,369 $ 12,951 $ (7,417) 2040 $ 37,366 $ 42,079 $ 4,713 $ 52,382 $ 48,411 $ (3,971) $ 15,016 $ 6,332 $ (8,684) 2045 $ 47,981 $ 54,911 $ 6,930 $ 53,312 $ 54,846 $ 1,534 $ 5,331 $ (65) $ (5,396) 15

Scenario 1 HB 6258 ($ in Millions) Baseline Impact Change Total Statutory Contributions Total Statutory Contributions Total Statutory Contributions Year Defined Benefit SMP Total Defined Benefit SMP Total Defined Benefit SMP Total 2013 $ 1,399 $ 44 $ 1,443 $ 1,403 $ 40 $ 1,443 $ 4 $ (4) $ - 2014 $ 1,504 $ 48 $ 1,552 $ 1,170 $ 41 $ 1,211 $ (334) $ (7) $ (341) 2015 $ 1,577 $ 49 $ 1,626 $ 1,148 $ 39 $ 1,187 $ (429) $ (10) $ (439) 2016 $ 1,587 $ 50 $ 1,637 $ 1,165 $ 38 $ 1,203 $ (422) $ (12) $ (434) 2017 $ 1,613 $ 52 $ 1,665 $ 1,206 $ 36 $ 1,242 $ (407) $ (16) $ (423) 2018 $ 1,671 $ 54 $ 1,725 $ 1,234 $ 35 $ 1,270 $ (437) $ (19) $ (455) 2019 $ 1,713 $ 56 $ 1,769 $ 1,265 $ 34 $ 1,300 $ (448) $ (22) $ (469) 2020 $ 1,756 $ 58 $ 1,814 $ 1,298 $ 34 $ 1,332 $ (458) $ (24) $ (482) 2025 $ 1,980 $ 68 $ 2,048 $ 1,493 $ 28 $ 1,522 $ (487) $ (40) $ (526) 2030 $ 2,221 $ 78 $ 2,299 $ 1,747 $ 22 $ 1,769 $ (474) $ (56) $ (530) 2035 $ 2,521 $ 90 $ 2,611 $ 2,062 $ 14 $ 2,076 $ (459) $ (76) $ (535) 2040 $ 2,818 $ 107 $ 2,924 $ 2,443 $ 8 $ 2,450 $ (375) $ (99) $ (474) 2045 $ 3,164 $ 127 $ 3,292 $ 270 $ 4 $ 274 $ (2,894) $ (123) $ (3,018) Total Cont. Through 2045 $ 73,457 $ 2,621 $ 76,078 $ 54,573 $ 733 $ 55,306 $ (18,884) $ (1,887) $ (20,771) Present Value of Total Cont. $ 22,523 $ 767 $ 23,289 $ 17,307 $ 351 $ 17,658 $ (5,216) $ (415) $ (5,631) 16 Defined benefit under HB 6258 includes the Tier 1 plan and cash balance plan. SMP under HB 6258 includes the contributions for members that were current SMP members at the effective date and remain in SMP.

Scenario 1 HB 6258 ($ in Millions) Baseline Impact Change Statutory Contributions (including SMP) Statutory Contributions (including SMP) Statutory Contributions (including SMP) Year State Employer Total State Employer Total State Employer Total 2013 $ 1,443 $ - $ 1,443 $ 1,443 $ - $ 1,443 $ - $ - $ - 2014 $ 1,552 $ - $ 1,552 $ 1,193 $ 18 $ 1,211 $ (359) $ 18 $ (341) 2015 $ 1,626 $ - $ 1,626 $ 1,149 $ 38 $ 1,187 $ (477) $ 38 $ (439) 2016 $ 1,637 $ - $ 1,637 $ 1,144 $ 59 $ 1,203 $ (493) $ 59 $ (434) 2017 $ 1,665 $ - $ 1,665 $ 1,161 $ 81 $ 1,242 $ (504) $ 81 $ (423) 2018 $ 1,725 $ - $ 1,725 $ 1,165 $ 105 $ 1,270 $ (560) $ 105 $ (455) 2019 $ 1,769 $ - $ 1,769 $ 1,170 $ 130 $ 1,300 $ (599) $ 130 $ (469) 2020 $ 1,814 $ - $ 1,814 $ 1,174 $ 157 $ 1,332 $ (640) $ 157 $ (482) 2025 $ 2,048 $ - $ 2,048 $ 1,288 $ 234 $ 1,522 $ (760) $ 234 $ (526) 2030 $ 2,299 $ - $ 2,299 $ 1,545 $ 224 $ 1,769 $ (754) $ 224 $ (530) 2035 $ 2,611 $ - $ 2,611 $ 1,850 $ 227 $ 2,076 $ (761) $ 227 $ (535) 2040 $ 2,924 $ - $ 2,924 $ 2,205 $ 245 $ 2,450 $ (719) $ 245 $ (474) 2045 $ 3,292 $ - $ 3,292 $ - $ 274 $ 274 $ (3,292) $ 274 $ (3,018) Total Cont. Through 2045 $ 76,078 $ - $ 76,078 $ 48,823 $ 6,483 $ 55,306 $ (27,254) $ 6,483 $ (20,771) Present Value of Total Cont. $ 23,289 $ - $ 23,289 $ 15,897 $ 1,761 $ 17,658 $ (7,392) $ 1,761 $ (5,631) 17

18 Assumptions and Additional Commentary Plan design changes apply to all Tier 1 members. Changes to Tier 1 benefits apply to all years of service. This is not an endorsement for or against changing benefits for current members. This is also not a comment on the contractual or constitutional implications of changing benefits for current members. It is for illustrative purposes only. All calculations are based on the June 30, 2012 actuarial valuation results including the provisions of SURS and actuarial assumptions in effect on June 30, 2012. CPI is assumed to increase at 2.75%. All present value calculations are as of June 30, 2012. Previous asset gains and losses are phased-in to each projection. No future gains or losses are assumed All contributions are determined as a percent of capped payroll. 15% of new hires are assumed to participate in the Self Managed Plan (SMP) under the baseline only. Under HB 6258 all new hires participate in the cash balance plan. No contributions for unfunded liability attributable to service on or after July 1, 2013 for employers are assumed in this analysis. Significant administrative changes would need to occur if separate accounts were established and maintained for each employer and gains and losses separately tracked. No additional administrative expenses were assumed in this analysis.

Disclosures Circular 230 Notice: Pursuant to regulations issued by the IRS, to the extent this presentation concerns tax matters, it is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matter addressed within. Each taxpayer should seek advice based on the individual s circumstances from an independent tax advisor. This presentation shall not be construed to provide tax advice, legal advice or investment advice. The actuaries submitting this presentation (Leslie Thompson, Amy Williams and Lance Weiss) are members of the American Academy of Actuaries and meet the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinion contained herein. The results summarized in this report involve actuarial calculations that require assumptions about future events. The major actuarial assumptions used in this analysis were provided by and are the responsibility of SURS. We are unable to judge the reasonableness of some of these assumptions without performing a substantial amount of additional work beyond the scope of the assignment. 19

Disclosures Future actuarial measurements may differ significantly from the current measurements presented in this report due to such factors as the following: plan experience differing from that anticipated by the economic or demographic assumptions; changes in economic or demographic assumptions; and changes in plan provisions or applicable law. Additional information regarding actuarial assumptions and methods, and important additional disclosures are provided in the full actuarial valuation report of SURS as of June 30, 2012. If you need additional information to make an informed decision about the contents of this presentation, or if anything appears to be missing or incomplete, please contact us before relying on this presentation. 20

Cliff Notes ($ in Millions) Study Number Description Total Contributions through 2045 (Savings)/Cost compared to Baseline (Savings)/Cost compared to Baseline (PV) Comments and Observations Baseline No Changes $76,078 Total Contribution is made by the State and there are no benefit changes 1 State Portion of Contribution Employer Portion of Contribution Total State Plus Employer $48,823 ($27,254) ($7,392) The total State Contribution decreases as a result of shifting normal cost contributions to employers and benefit changes including an increase in employee contributions for Tier 1 members. $6,483 $6,483 $1,761 Employers begin to make contributions in fiscal year 2014 of 0.5% of pay. Contributions increase by 0.5% per year until total net normal cost is contributed by employers. $55,306 ($20,771) ($5,631) Total contributions from the State and Employer decrease compared to the baseline. The funded ratio is 100% in 2043 compared to a funded ratio of 90% in 2045 under the baseline. 21