Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative 2016 CoC NOFA Evaluation Tool for Renewal Project Applications

Similar documents
COC RANKING For Grant Year 2017

FY 2017 TX BoS CoC Review, Score, and Ranking Procedures and Reallocation Process for HUD Continuum of Care Program Funds

TOOL OVERVIEW. FY2019 CoC Program Competition Renewal Project Scoring Tool

2018 Kentucky Balance of State CoC Expansion Project Scoresheet for RRH and PSH Projects (Approved by KY BoS CoC Advisory Board August 3, 2018)

HUD CoC Reviewing, Scoring and Ranking Procedure

Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Continuum of Care 2017 Renewal Project Performance Scorecard

FY2019 HCCSC SCORING CRITERIA AND SCORE SHEET

AGENDA. 1. Welcome and Introductions. 2. Review IRP Meeting Summary from Feb. 7, HUD CoC Program NOFA

Attachment C. Updated March 23 rd, 2018 by EveryOne Home

Using Data to Make Funding and Reallocation Decisions

FY16 HUD CoC Program Consolidated Application Scoring Criteria Summary June 2016

NY-606/Rockland County CoC Rank & Review - Attachments Checklist

APR Data: # of Clients: # of Households # of Adults # of Leavers: # of Adult Leavers:

FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

Summary of 3 County CoC SPM Report Data

FY2017 CoC Program Competition Application Score Cards

Standards for CoC- and ESG-Funded Rapid Re-Housing Programs in the Metropolitan Denver Continuum of Care

2017 HUD CoC Program Rating and Review Procedure

FY Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

2017 Saratoga-North Country CoC Project Rank & Review Application

Performance Measurement Module (Sys PM)

Continuum of Care Written Standards for NY- 508 Buffalo, Niagara Falls/Erie, Niagara, Orleans, Genesee, Wyoming Counties CoC

The Role of HUD s Homeless and Mainstream Housing Programs in Ending Homelessness. Jennifer Ho Ann Marie Oliva Marcy Thompson

HUD 2016 System Performance Measures Submission Recap. NYC Coalition on the Continuum of Care October 20, 2017

2018 Performance Management Plan. Ohio Balance of State Continuum of Care Updated January 2018

PSH Renewal Review & Scoring Document

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - Updated July 1, June 30, 2019

Santa Clara County Performance Measures - finalized July 1, June 30, 2017

HMIS 320 APR Training

1A. Continuum of Care (CoC) Identification

Written Standards for Permanent Supportive Housing

FY 2013 NOFA Planning and Advocacy December 17, 2013

1A. Continuum of Care (CoC) Identification

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT:

Continuum of Care (CoC) and Emergency Solutions Grant Program (ESG) 2015 Policy Manual

NC ESG Application Form: Regional Application (January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017)

a. Standard policies and procedures for evaluating individuals and families eligibility for assistance under Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG).

Action steps for improving funding coordination

RECOMMENDATION #1: PROVIDE MORE HOUSING NAVIGATORS/CASE MANAGERS

Proposed Consolidated Plan and 2015 Action Plan

SACRAMENTO HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM: DATA QUALITY PLAN

Before Starting the Exhibit 1 Continuum of Care (CoC) Application

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY HOMELESS ACTION PARTNERSHIP

FY2016 Detroit Continuum of Care (CoC) Funding Announcements Report to Detroit CoC Board January 9, 2017

Implementing the HEARTH Act: The Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) program

HUD Notice Soliciting Comments on ESG Interim Rule National Alliance to End Homelessness Summary of Notice June 25, 2015

City of Tucson Housing and Community Development Department Planning and Development Division

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

CoC Annual Performance Report (APR) Guide

2019 Housing Inventory Count (HIC) Guidance Document

NCDA Region I New England Fall Conference HUD Update November 2, 2017

Office of Community Planning and Development

Updated 01/22/2019 ID 24, Page 1 of 5

[HUDX-225] HMIS Data Quality Report Reference Tool

The 2017 HUD CoC Annual Performance Report (CoC-APR) Training for the Ohio Balance of State and Mahoning CoCs

County of Riverside Continuum of Care (CoC)

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2014 Key Performance Indicators

Before Starting the CoC Application

HMIS PROGRAMMING SPECIFICATIONS

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

Summary and Analysis of the Interim ESG Rule December 2011

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the BYC and SPP

Administering CoC and ESG Rapid Re-housing Assistance

11/15/2011. The Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program: An Introductory Overview. Submitting Questions in the Webinar

PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING (PSH) IN AUSTIN, TEXAS

The Community Partnership How to Run the CoC-APR 2018 Report Version 1 Last Updated December 17, 2018

Data Quality Plan Tampa / Hillsborough County Continuum of Care

County of Riverside Continuum of Care (CoC)

FY2018 Chicago Continuum of Care (CoC) Ranking Policies and Final Ranking Listing. Developed by the Project Prioritization Workgroup

Joint Office of Homeless Services FY 2018 Proposed Budget

SHP Start-up Conference Financial Controls and Billing

Proposed San Francisco Response to Solicitation of Comment on Specific Issues For Emergency Solutions Grant Program Interim Rule

The HUD Claim Process Continuum of Care Program

HUD-ESG CAPER User Guide

HEARTH Funding Opportunities Task Group Meeting August 9, :30am Via conference call

Measure 1: Length of Time Persons Remain Homeless

Project Application Part 7: Budget Information

HMIS Programming Specifications PATH Annual Report. January 2018

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development

SAN FRANCISCO LOCAL HOMELESS COORDINATING BOARD. DRAFT Minutes Full Board January 9, :00am-1:00pm City Hall Room 408, San Francisco

EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) FUNDING

The Community Partnership HMIS Data Collection Guide Version 3 - Last Updated October 10, 2018

HMIS REQUIRED UNIVERSAL DATA ELEMENTS

NOTES. Step 2: choose the correct city if 2 or more cities share the same ZIP Code.

Planning for your Financial Audit with Booth Management. August 5, 2015

Valley of the Sun United Way Final Evaluation of the Rapid Rehousing 250 Program

Continuum of Care (CoC) Eligible and Ineligible Costs LEASING 24 CFR

Project Application Part 7: Budget Information

Dear Secretary Donovan, Administrator Sunstein, and Director Muñoz:

Blue Ridge Interagency Council on Homelessness

DENVER S ROAD HOME PEAK PERFORMANCE MARCH 20, PERFORMANCE REVIEW 2015 INNOVATION PLANNING

Massachusetts Homelessness Data Warehouse Proposal

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development IX. FIELD OFFICE REVIEW OF RESALE/RECAPTURE PROVISIONS...

ServicePoint Handbook

Toledo Lucas County Continuum of Care: 2016 Key Performance Indicators

Risk Assessments. Matthew Schneer OSEP Fiscal Implementation Team Facilitator

Exhibit 5-3: Sample Performance Measurement Framework (Note that all activities, outputs, outcomes, and percentages are hypothetical.

HPRP: Strategies for Achieving Performance and Spending Goals

REPORT. Amendments to Two San Diego Rapid Re-Housing Program Contracts

American Recovery & Re-Investment Act. Homelessness Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP) Update

Transcription:

Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative 2016 CoC NOFA Evaluation Tool for Renewal Project Applications The questions to be answered by renewal applicants are listed below at left. At right are the criteria that evaluators must use to score applicants answers. Not all questions are scored. Only the questions with corresponding evaluation criteria should be scored. SH = 44pts, PSH = 50pts, RRH= 44pts, TH = 44pts Part I 2B. Recipient Performance APR Submission 1. Has the recipient successfully submitted the APR on time for the most recently expired grant term related to this renewal request? Dates match = 1 point Submission late = 0 points HUD Monitoring Findings 2. Does the recipient have any unresolved HUD Monitoring and/or OIG Audit findings covering any previous grant term related to this renewal project request? No findings = 1 point Unresolved Findings = 0 points Financial Performance 3. Have any funds been recaptured by HUD for the most recently expired grant term related to this renewal project request? No = 2 points Yes = Less than 5% = 1 point More than 10% = 0 points

Project Information 3B. Project Description 1. General Description Provide a clear and concise description of the entire scope of the project: The description should: a) Describe the community needs; b) Target population(s) to be served; c) Project plan for addressing the identified housing and supportive service needs; d) Projected project outcomes (must be measurable and data driven); e) Coordination with other source(s) or partner(s); f) The reason why CoC Program support is needed. 1 point for each area addressed (a f) 3. Housing First (PSH, RRH and TH only) What is Housing First? Housing First is an approach to quickly and successfully connect individuals and families experiencing homelessness to permanent housing without preconditions and barriers to entry, such as sobriety, treatment or service participation requirements. Supportive services are offered to maximize housing stability and prevent returns to homelessness as opposed to addressing predetermined treatment goals prior to permanent housing entry. b. Has the project removed the following barriers to accessing housing and services (select all that apply) c. Has the project removed the following as reasons for program termination? No barriers to access and no reasons for termination = 3pts 1-2 barriers to access and/or reasons for termination = 1pt More than 2 barriers and/or reasons for termination = 0pts d. Policies related to Housing First attached? (Y/N) Not scored

4A. Supportive Services for Participants in your project (All Housing Types) 4. For all supportive services available to participants, indicate who will provide them, how they will be accessed, and how often they will be provided Give score of 1pt on thoroughness of description in answering who will provide (1pt), how they will be accessed (1pt), and how often they will be provided (1pt) 2. Please identify whether the project includes the following activities: 2a. Transportation assistance to clients to attend mainstream benefit appointments, employment training or jobs? 2b. Use of a single application form for four or more mainstream benefits? 2c. Regular follow-ups with participants to ensure mainstream benefits are received or renewed? Yes = 1pt per question No = 0pts per question 3. Do project participants have access to SSI/SSDI technical assistance provided by the applicant, a subrecipient, or partner agency? 3a. If yes, has the staff person providing the technical assistance completed SOAR training in the past 24 months? Yes to providing access to TA = 1pts Yes to completed SOAR training in the last 24 months = 1pt No access to TA = 0pts 4B. Housing Type and Location 3. Beds for the Chronically Homeless (PSH only) a. How many of the total beds entered in 2b. Beds are dedicated to the chronically homeless? d. How many of the beds listed in question 3c. above will be prioritized for use by the chronically homeless in the FY2016 operating year? 100% = 3pts

<100% (less than 100%) = 0pts Match Did the recipient/sub-recipient provide documentation of at least 25% cash or in-kind match of the total grant budget minus leasing costs. (Example: Grant total is $100,000; leasing line item is $60,000; recipient/sub-recipient must provide 25% match on the remaining $40,000) Yes = 1pt No = 0pts APR outcome measures for most recently completed grant period Housing Retention: For TH, SH and RRH projects percentage of households served that obtained permanent housing at exit. For PSH projects percentage of households served that retained housing for more than 1 year plus leavers who exited to a permanent housing destination. > 80% = 6pts = 80% = 5pts > 70% = 4pts <70% = 0pts Maintaining Mainstream Benefits (All Projects): Percentage of leavers who exited the program with at least one (1) mainstream benefit (non-cash). > 56% = 6pts = 56% = 5pts > 46% = 4pts <46% = 0pts

Obtaining/Increasing Earned Income (All Projects): Percentage of leavers who exited the program who maintained or increased earned income. > 20% = 6pts = 20% = 5pts > 15% = 4pts <15% = 0pts Maintaining/Increasing Other (non-employment) Income (All Projects): Percentage of leavers who exited the program who maintained or increased other (non-employment) income. > 54% = 6pts = 54% = 5pts > 44% = 4pts <44% = 0pts Cost of Housing Per Person/Per Unit (All Projects): N/A Amount spent per person/unit served. NOT SCORED