ECONOMIC MONITOR GEORGIA Issue 8 [updated] June 218 Overview High economic growth of 5.% in 217 and 5.5% in Jan-Apr 218 Demand side: balanced growth based on consumption, investment and net exports Positive development in services and industry in 217, but decline in agriculture Inflation decreases to 2.5% in May 218; largely price stability Lari appreciation since late 217, after depreciation in autumn 217 caused by seasonal fluctuations Exports increased by 29% in 217 and 28% in Jan-May 218 Budget deficit 217 lower than planned (2.9% instead of 3.6% of GDP), thanks to higher revenues 27 June: IMF decided to disburse the third tranche of its programme amounting to USD 43.6 bn Topics Mining of cryptocurrencies. Own estimation of contribution to GDP Mid-term fiscal plan. Higher public investment combined with a lower budget deficit Banking sector. Stability and concentration De-dollarisation. Partial success in 217
Georgia Moldova Belarus Ukraine Russia GDP, USD bn 16.1 9.2 59.2 119.1 1,719.9 GDP/capita, USD 4,37 2,596 6,3 2,821 11,947 Population, m 3.7 3.5 9.4 42.2 144. Source: IMF World Economic Outlook Apr 218, forecast 218 Export Basic indicators Trade structure Import EU 24% CIS 43% Others 33% EU 28% CIS 3% Others 42% Others 4% Mineral waters 4% Gold 3% Source: Geostat, 217; Note: trade in goods Spirits Nuts 5% 3% Copper, copper products 15% Iron alloys 11% Motor vehicles 9% Wine 6% Medicine 5% Plastics/ Rubbers 5% Others 17% Metals 7% Motor vehicles 1% Chemicals 1% Source: Geostat, 217; Note: trade in goods Minerals 2% Food products 15% Machinery Electricals 17% 2
Economic growth 5 4 3 2 1 15 1 5-5 -1 % yoy % contribution to GDP growth Source: Geostat 215 216 217 218* 219* Source: IMF June 218; *Forecast Real GDP growth Contribution to economic growth (nominal) Private consumption Gross capital formation Public consumption Net exports 215 216 217 GDP 217 Economic growth: 5.% Drivers: Private consumption Investment Net exports Demand side: balanced growth GDP 218 Jan-Apr yoy: 5.5% Forecast for 218 IMF: 4.8% Galt & Taggart Research: 5.4% Conclusion High economic growth Growth broad based 3
Sectoral perspective 14 12 1 8 6 4 2-2 Education 4% Real estate, renting and business activities 6% Agriculture 7% Construction 8% Source: GeoStat, 217 % yoy Others 21% Composition of GDP Sectoral dynamic Retail trade and repair business 17% Industry 14% Transport, gastronomy and ICT 11% Public administration 12% Agriculture Industry Services -4 213 214 215 216 217 Source: Geostat Agriculture Decrease by 2.7% in 217 Disappointing development reveals structural problems Industry Positive development: 4.5% in 217 As in 216 important contribution to GDP Services Increase by 6.% in 217 Tourism and construction have increased by ca. 11%, respectively Conclusion Services still most important driver of economic growth Also positive development of industry Agriculture remains problematic 4
Aug-13 Okt-13 Dez-13 Feb-14 Apr-14 Jun-14 Aug-14 Okt-14 Dez-14 Feb-15 Apr-15 Jun-15 Aug-15 Okt-15 Dez-15 Feb-16 Apr-16 Jun-16 Aug-16 Okt-16 Dez-16 Feb-17 Apr-17 Jun-17 Aug-17 Okt-17 Dez-17 Feb-18 Apr-18 Inflation and monetary policy 6 4 2 Source: IMF Country Report June 218, *forecast; Note: Annual average (consumer prices) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 % change yoy % Inflation rate and inflation target 215 216 217 218* 219* Inflation rate Inflation target NBG policy rate 6.5% 7.25% 217 Inflation: 6.% yoy Thus: higher than target of 4.% Reason: not monetary, but fiscal In detail: increase in excise taxes for mineral oil, cars, tobacco and gas in beginning of 217 218 Inflation May 218: 2.5% yoy Reasons for decline in inflation One-off fiscal effect ceases Increase in policy rate in 217 Inflation target National Bank: 3.% Forecast IMF: 2.8% Conclusion Inflation at appropriate levels Stability orientated monetary policy of National Bank ( inflation targeting ) Source: National Bank of Georgia 5
Jun 13 Sep 13 Dez 13 Mrz 14 Jun 14 Sep 14 Dez 14 Mrz 15 Jun 15 Sep 15 Dez 15 Mrz 16 Jun 16 Sep 16 Dez 16 Mrz 17 Jun 17 Sep 17 Dez 17 Mrz 18 Current account and exchange rate % of GDP -2-4 Current account Current account deficit Decline of the deficit from 12.8% in 216 to 8.7% of GDP in 217 Positive, but deficit still high -6-8 -1-12 -14 215 216 217 218* 219* Source: IMF Country Report June 218; *Forecast USD bn 3.2 3. 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 Exchange rate and international reserves GEL/USD 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 International reserves (left scale) Official exchange rate (right scale) Source: National Bank of Georgia 6 Exchange rate Aug 217: 2.4 GEL/USD Nov 217: 2.7 GEL/USD Jun 218: 2.5 GEL/USD Typical seasonal fluctuation due to tourism and other factors No reason for NBG intervention International reserves Apr 218: increase to USD 3. bn; equivalent to ca 3.5 month of import coverage Conclusion National Bank s flexible exchange rate policy important for external stability
External trade 3 2 1 % yoy External trade Export Import Dynamic 217: increase in exports by 29.1%, imports increase by 9.4%; positive Jan-May 218: continuation of positive dynamic -1-2 -3 Source: Geostat 214 215 216 217 Jan-May 218 Others 13% United States 4% Armenia 8% China 8% Turkey 8% Azerbaijan 1% Source: Geostat, 217; Note: trade in goods Export by countries EU 24% Other CIS 11% Russia 14% Export dynamic by countries Jan-May 218 AZE: +156.5% UKR: +92.7% ARM: +36.% EU: +13.7% RUS: +13.2% Exports spurred by regional recovery Conclusion Regional recovery, especially in AZE, UKR and ARM, supports Georgian exports 7
Public finances and government debt % of GDP Budget deficit -.5-1 -1.5-2 -2.5-3 -3.5-4 215 216 217 218* 219* Source: IMF Country Report from June 218, *Forecast; Note: GFSM 1998-Definition Public debt 46 % of GDP 44 42 4 38 215 216 217 218* 219* Source: IMF Country Report from June 218; *Forecast Budget deficit 217/218 217: deficit of 2.9% of GDP Less than planned (3.6%) and in line with IMF Main reason: higher revenues Higher economic growth Reform of corporate tax: Revenue shortfalls only 1.1% of GDP; 1.5% planned 218: Deficit of 2.8% of GDP Medium-term planning Reduction of deficit to 2.3% of GDP in 222 Simultaneously: higher public investments How possible? See slide 11 Conclusion Good fiscal position Important factor for smooth implementation of IMF programme 27 June: IMF Executive Board decided to disburse third tranche amounting to USD 43.6 bn 8
Bilateral trade between Germany and Georgia 45 3 EUR m German trade with Georgia Trade volume Trade volume between Georgia and Germany in 217 amounted to EUR 423 m 15-15 Electrotechnology 3% Measuring and control equipment 6% German exports German imports Balance 215 216 217 Jan-Apr 218 Source: German Federal Statistics Office, Note: Trade in goods German exports to Georgia Other 24% Electronic devices 6% Food products 9% Machinery 13% Chemicals 21% Motor vehicles and parts 18% Exports to Georgia 217: increase by 5.2% Jan-Apr 218: +12.1% Imports from Georgia 217: decrease by 19.2% Jan-Apr 218: increase by 8.8% Conclusion Good development of German exports Imports from GEO start to recover Source: German Federal Statistics Office, Note: Trade in goods 9
Mining of cryptocurrencies Georgia: one of the biggest miners of cryptocurrencies world-wide Reasons: low electricity costs, good business climate and tax exemptions in free industrial zones Economic relevance: unknown so far, barely covered by official statistics GET Georgia: own estimation of contribution to GDP in 217 Contribution of crypto-mining to GDP in 217 Electricity consumption Electricity/BTC Number of BTC (incl. transaction fees) Average price BTC in 217 Revenue Electricity Processors, hardware Other inputs 569,4 MWh 8.43 MWh 77,837 BTC 4,1 USD USD 311 m USD -28 m USD -72 m USD -3 m Contribution to GDP USD 181 m % of GDP 1.2% Comparable to: mining and quarrying (1.1%), manufacture of alcoholic beverages (1.1%), restaurants,. (1.6%) 1
Mid-term fiscal plan Mid-term planning Higher public investments combined with a lower budget deficit Possible? Yes, because consumptive expenditure (as % of GDP) shall be markedly reduced From 25.9% in 216 to 2.8% of GDP in 222 Areas: public wages and administration, efficacy of health sector, framework for public-private-partnership Realistic? Yes, as long as high economic growth continues % of GDP 216 217* 218** 219** 22** 221** 222** Revenues 28.3 29. 27.9 27.3 27.2 27.2 27.1 Expenditures 29.9 29.6 29.5 29.6 29.5 28.8 28.5 Current expenditures 25.9 24.2 23.1 22.5 21.7 2.8 2.8 Capital expenditures 4. 5.4 6.4 7.1 7.8 7.9 7.8 Net lending/ borrowing (before adjustment) -1.6 -.5-1.6-2.3-2.3-1.5-1.4 Unidentified measures....8.8.. Net lending/ borrowing (after adjustment) -1.6 -.5-1.6-1.5-1.5-1.5-1.4 Budget lending 1.4 2.4 1.2 1.1 1..9.9 Deficit*** -3. -2.9-2.8-2.6-2.5-2.4-2.3 Source: IMF report June 218 (second programme review); *preliminary data; **projection; ***Augmented net lending / borrowing 11
Feb-214 June-214 Oct-214 Feb-215 June-215 Oct-215 Feb-216 June-216 Oct-216 Feb-217 June-217 Oct-217 Banking sector assets, 216 12 1 8 6 4 2 3 25 2 15 1 5-5 -1 % % of GDP Banking sector: stability and high concentration Romania Ukraine Moldova Armenia Georgia Turkey Latvia Source: National Banks, eop, data for 216 Corporates vs retail loan growth Corporates real loan growth Retail real loan growth Total real loan growth Banking sector is well developed in regional comparison and loan access for households and SMEs is good Equity ratio with 16% continues to be very high Risks lie in dollarisation and resulting from it in open currency positions However, non-performing loans (NPLs) are low Concentration in the banking sector remains high, with 77% of assets in 3 banks. High profitability remains controversial Two biggest banks have good governance standards due to London listing and there is almost no state interference in the financial system The systemic relevance ( too-big-to-fail ) of the two banks produces disincentives and requires a resolutions framework Source: NBG, own calculations 12
De-dollarisation: partial success in 217 68 66 64 62 6 58 56 54 52 5 % Loan dollarisation ratio Source: NBG; excl. interbank deposits; not exchange rate adjusted 75 7 65 6 55 5 % Deposit dollarisation ratio Significant decline in loan dollarisation in 217, likely helped by prohibition of loans in foreign currency under GEL 1, Also reduction in deposit dollarisation However: deposit dollarisation cannot be addressed by administrative measures alone Additionally: foreign currency still widely regarded as a sounder store of value Some progress in fighting dollarisation in 217 Source: NBG; excl. interbank deposits; not exchange rate adjusted 13
German Economic Team Georgia The German Economic Team (GET Georgia) has been supporting the Georgian government in designing the necessary reform process since 214. In a dialogue with the Georgian Government, we identify existing economic problems and develop actionable policy recommendations to overcome them. Our advisory work is based on independent analysis and impartial recommendations. GET Georgia is financed by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy and implemented by Berlin Economics. Contact: German Economic Team Georgia Tel: +49 3/ 2 61 34 64 c/o Berlin Economics info@get-georgia.de Schillerstraße 59 www.get-georgia.de 1627 Berlin Twitter: @BerlinEconomics Facebook: @BE.Berlin.Economics 14