Local Economic Impact Local Multiplier 3 (LM3) analysis

Similar documents
Malvern Hills Local Development Scheme November 2017 Update

* Calculating Personnel Hours *

CONNECTING WORCESTERSHIRE PHASE 3 BROADBAND PROGRAMME

AGENDA ITEM 4 CABINET 15 DECEMBER BUDGET AND COUNCIL TAX. Relevant Cabinet Member Mr S E Geraghty

UK Government Construction Pipeline

Economic Impact of the Commercial Construction Industry on the Economy of the State of Alabama

Firefighter Pension Administration and Pensioner Payroll Service

Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis of Proposed IKEA in Dublin, California

We can use fractions to describe things that have been broken into equal parts, for example:

Oversight of three PFI waste projects

Tulip Time 2015: Economic Impact and Attendee Profile

Options Analysis for Unitary Local Government in Lincolnshire

Local auditor reporting in England 2018

Changes in councils adult social care and overall service spending in England, to

Scottish Borders Council Revenue Financial Plan 2017/18 Appendix 2 Executive 5th September 2017

SOLVING EQUATIONS ENGAGE NY PINK PACKET PAGE 18

Hereford & Worcester Fire Authority 2017/18 Capital Programme

Q. Can you explain the main principles of PFI, what it will mean for the Island and how it is financed?

Why choose BDC? A complimentary capital source. BDC: a unique client service experience

Analyze probability and impact. Identify type of risk. Apply mitigation measures. Monitor & Risk Analysis Report. Introduction

CABINET BALANCED SCORECARD FUTUREFIT UPDATE

Homework. Part 1. Computer Implementation: Solve Wilson problem by the Lindo and compare the results with your graphical solution.

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK 12236

National Infrastructure and Construction Pipeline

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH

Agenda. Cabinet. Thursday, 29 June 2017, am County Hall, Worcester. Worcestershire County Council

The Economic Impacts of Oregon Health & Science University

Quarter Quarter Quarter Additional information / Action taken Non-Residential services commissioned and provided for

Cabinet (Resources) Panel 9 December 2014

Financial sustainability of schools

Annual Report

7. POSITIVE ACTIVITES FOR YOUNG PEOPLE: FUTURE DIRECTION

Professional Practice 544

Budget Scrutiny Planning Group Information 25 August 2017 Council Reserves Background Papers

ANALYSIS OF COMMUTING WORKFORCE. Boone/Winnebago County, Illinois

U.S. CAPITAL SPENDING PATTERNS

Budget General Information (characteristics of district) Supplemental Information for Tables in Summary of Expenditures

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Morgan County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

Economic Impacts of the First 5 Placer Children & Families Commission s Funded Programs

Treasury and Capital Management Panel Bulletin. Treasury Management Update

1. Actual estimation may be more complex because of the use of statistical methods.

COLORADO FILM INCENTIVES

TREATING SMALLER BUSINESSES LIKE CONSUMERS

UK Government Construction Pipeline August 2015

Documenting Your Value to the Organization

A Report of the Economic Impact of Sanderson Farms in Mineola, Texas

Chapter 8 Aggregate Expenditure and Equilibrium Output. Kazu Matsuda IBEC 203 Macroeconomics

The Economic Impact of the 2012 Alberta Cross Country Ski World Cup

7th Grade Math Chapter 6 Percents

Budget Initial Public Forum FY16-17 February 22, Town of Chapel Hill 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.

2016 Economic Impact of Tourism in Tippecanoe County. Methodology, Metrics and Evaluation

Cusgarne Organics Local Money Flows

ECO 120: Macroeconomics Your Name: In-class Exercise Keynesian Model Section (Circle One): 7:45am-9:10 9:25am-10:50

Policy and Procedures

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NATIONAL HERITAGE AREAS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH

Hereford & Worcester Fire Authority Statement of Prudential Indicators; & Minimum Revenue Provision Policy

COUNTY WIDE SHARED SERVICES INITIATIVE MAY 18 TH 2017 LOCUST GROVE

1 Rare Hazard event is not likely to occur within 100 years. 2 Occasional Hazard event is likely to occur within 100 years

Budget Environment and Sustainability Portfolio

Village of Harrisville Dissolution Study

International Economics Prof. S. K. Mathur Department of Humanities and Social Science Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Lecture No.

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AMAZON S MAJOR CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

Statistics Class 15 3/21/2012

Worcestershire County Council: Use of External Consultants

Clarion Housing Group Value for Money Statement 2017

Lawrence Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Marketing Program Impact Survey Report

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND DECENTRALIZATION

Budget Introduction Proposed Budget

Pay or Play Penalty Common Ownership Aggregation Rules

What to do with the Tool Kit Components of the Tool Kit

The Economic Impact of the 2014 Alberta Winter Games

Perfect Competition. Profit-Maximizing Level of Output. Profit-Maximizing Level of Output. Profit-Maximizing Level of Output

The Local Development Scheme

Economic Impact of the Proposed CME North American Merchant Energy, LLC Gas-Powered Electric Power Plant on Berrien County

19 21 April 2016 Brighton. Accounts and Estimates CD6

Disclaimer. The present document is made available only for advance information.

Scottish Living Wage Campaign response to the Procurement Reform Bill consultation. November 2012

The Economic Impact of Northern Virginia Transportation Authority Capital Investment

NHS WORCESTERSHIRE AUDIT COMMITTEE

DEB EL FOOD PRODUCTS EXPANSION BENEFIT / COST ANALYSIS

SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE MALVERN HILLS DISTRICT COUNCIL, WORCESTER CITY COUNCIL AND WYCHAVON DISTRICT COUNCIL

MACROECONOMICS - CLUTCH CH FISCAL POLICY.

The Fiscal Impact of the Proposed City of Sharon Springs on Forsyth County, Georgia

COLE COUNTY MISSOURI

PURCHASING MANUAL August, 2011

SSE s Economic Contribution to the UK, Scotland and the Republic of Ireland FY18 Results

Appendix 2: Financial Policies and Procedures The General Dental Council Financial Policies Contents

October 22-25, Hotel Harrisburg & Convention Center Camp Hill Bypass / Camp Hill, PA 17011

UCI Legislative Update. May 26, 2016 Julie Brown Local Assistance Division

Queen Creek Annual Budget Organizational Structure

Introduction...1. Project Overview.2. Cache la Poudre River NHA Economic Impact 4. Conclusion..10. Appendix A: Glossary of Terms 11

BP s impact on the economy in. A report by Oxford Economics December 2017

Name: Days/Times Class Meets: Today s Date:

Impact Analysis of the Greensboro Coliseum Complex for the 2012 Operating Year

2018 outlook and analysis letter

Proposed 2017 Budget. General Fund Stormwater Management Fund Sewer Fund Water Fund Solid Waste & Recycling Fund

The PC was asked to consider adding Councillor contact details and the latest Agenda and Minutes to the Parish Council section of the WCC website.

COUNTY FAMILY PLANNING BUDGET ALLOCATION

Arizona Low Income Housing Tax Credit and Housing Trust Fund Economic and Fiscal Impact Report

Local auditor reporting in England 2018

Transcription:

Appendix 3 Local Economic Impact Local Multiplier 3 (LM3) analysis Economy and Environment Overview and Scrutiny Panel 30 September 2015

Contents Background Outline of the approach Results Each round Local Multiplier 3 Indicator Conclusions 2

Background Council spends significant sums on services Local Multiplier approach is a simple and understandable way of measuring local economic impact of that spending Considers flow of money into and around an area Developed by the New Economics Foundation Initial analysis of 2013/14 data presented to the Open for Board in March 2015 subsequently updated using 2014/15 data (presented here) Uses Finance and Human Resources data, plus evidence gathered from supplier and staff engagement 3

Local Multiplier 3 - Approach Round 1: Starts with income of WCC (money available to be spent) Round 2: Identifies how this money is spent, and how much is local/ non-local Round 3: Identifies how suppliers and staff spend their money, and how much is local/ non-local 4

Local Multiplier 3 Round 1 County Council income = 644.5m Figure includes: spending of Worcestershire County Council activities spending on major school capital projects where the Council hold the funding schools support within WCC e.g. Learning and Achievement Excludes: spend devolved to schools from the Dedicated Schools Grant each school spends this on operating the school (i.e. staff, building costs, other running costs) Schools Devolved Capital (minor projects) Increase of 51,870 on 2013/14 expenditure Largely due to increased capital expenditure e.g. Energy from Waste, Highways schemes, Malvern Hills Science Park etc 5

Local Multiplier 3 - Round 1 Total: 644.5 million 6

Local Multiplier 3 - Round 2 Finance and HR data used to identify local/ non-local spend by category Category Total Local % local expenditure m expenditure m Total employees* 125.3 54.7 43.7 Transport 14.7 11.8 80.3 Premises 26.0 Supplies, services, 357.2 281.2 73.4 third party payments Capital Expenditure 121.2 79.3 65.4 Total 644.5 427.0 66.3 * Of the 125m total spend on employees 35m is employer National Insurance and pension contributions and is considered non-local, and 21m is employee tax and deductions which are considered non-local - the remaining 69m, is paid to staff, of which 80% goes to staff who live in Worcestershire Almost 55m went to employees who live in Worcestershire as take-home pay this is 44% of the total spending on employees 66% of WCC spending goes to staff or businesses within Worcestershire

Local Multiplier 3 - Round 3 Staff and suppliers were surveyed regarding where money received from Worcestershire County Council is spent 42 staff and 80 suppliers responded Local staff and local suppliers spend more in Worcestershire Category Total expenditure (from Round 2) m Local expenditure m % local Staff resident in Worcestershire 54.7 29.0 53 Staff not resident in Worcestershire 14.0 3.6 26 Worcestershire based 372.3 246.8 66 suppliers/providers Non-Worcestershire based 146.9 15.3 10 suppliers/providers Total 587.9 294.8 50 Staff living in Worcestershire indicated they spend 53% of their income in the county, compared to 26% for non- Worcestershirebased staff 8

Local Multiplier 3 - Indicator LM3 indicator = round 1 + round 2 + round 3 round 1 Theoretical maximum LM3 value = 3.0 (if all spending stayed local) Realistic maximum upper limit = 2.5 LM3 indicator = (644.5 + 427.0 + 294.8)/644.5 = 2.12 Every 1 spent by Worcestershire County Council contributes a total of 2.12 to the county's economy Total amount of money in the local economy from the three rounds of WCC spending is 1.37bn 9

Local Multiplier 3 how can we use it? A higher LM3 score would indicate more of the money spent by WCC is staying in the local economy For a given level of spend, LM3 score could theoretically be increased by: 1. Increasing the percentage of staff that live in Worcestershire 2. Increasing the percentage of staff spending in Worcestershire 3. Increasing the percentage of spend that goes to local Worcestershire companies 4. Increasing the percentage of supplier spending that goes to Worcestershire staff and businesses Greatest scope to increase LM3 from supplier spend rather than staff spend BUT need to comply with procurement regulations 10

Conclusions Local Multiplier analysis helps the council to understand and consider how the money it spends flows through the local economy The analysis looks at part, but not all, of the council s economic impact Could inform procurement processes through supplier discussions understand local benefits from potential contracts (e.g. when Commissioning) but process and decisions need to comply with procurement rules 11