Sheltered Homeless Persons. Louisville/Jefferson County 10/1/2009-9/30/2010

Similar documents
Sheltered Homeless Persons. Nebraska Balance of State 10/1/2016-9/30/2017

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Washington County, OR 10/1/2012-9/30/2013

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Orange County, NY 10/1/2013-9/30/2014

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Auburn/Cayuga County 10/1/2013-9/30/2014

Sheltered Homeless Persons

Exhibit 1.1 Estimated Homeless Counts during a One-Year Period 1 Reporting Year: 10/1/2016-9/30/2017 Site: Washington County, OR

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Idaho Balance of State 10/1/2009-9/30/2010

Exhibit 1.1 Estimated Homeless Counts during a One-Year Period 1 Reporting Year: 10/1/2016-9/30/2017 Site: Washington County, OR

Sheltered Homeless Persons. Tarrant County/Ft. Worth 10/1/2012-9/30/2013

Exhibit 1.1 Estimated Homeless Counts during a One-Year Period 1 Reporting Year: 10/1/2011-9/30/2012 Site: Nebraska Balance of State

2009 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR)

HHS PATH Intake Assessment

HMIS Programming Specifications PATH Annual Report. January 2018

HMIS PROGRAMMING SPECIFICATIONS

HMIS INTAKE - HOPWA. FIRST NAME MIDDLE NAME LAST NAME (and Suffix) Client Refused. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander LIVING SITUATION

[HUDX-225] HMIS Data Quality Report Reference Tool

Universal Intake Form

CLARITY HMIS: HUD-CoC PROJECT INTAKE FORM

Name Data Quality (DQ) D.O.B. Type (DQ) Gender (from list)

Standards for Success HOPWA Data Elements

Universal Intake Form

DESTINATION Which of the following most closely matches where the client will be staying right after leaving this project?

QUALITY OF SOCIAL SECURITY Client doesn t know Full SSN reported Client refused Approximate or partial SSN reported Data not collected

Key Demographics N % Total Surveyed % Unclear / Blank Response % % % % Decline to Answer

Counts! Bergen County s 2017 Point-In-Time Count of the Homeless

QUALITY OF SOCIAL SECURITY Client doesn t know Full SSN reported Client refused Approximate or partial SSN reported Data not collected

SACRAMENTO HOMELESS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM: DATA QUALITY PLAN

Housing Assistance Application

Gloucester County s 2017 Point-In-Time Count of the Homeless

New Hampshire Continua of Care SGIA Homelessness Prevention (HP) Project Record Creation Intake Entry Services Exit Packet

2018 HMIS INTAKE VA: SSVF Homelessness Prevention Head of Household or Adult (18+)

SOUTH TEXAS HEROES HOUSING ASSISTANCE (STHHA) APPLICATION

Full DOB reported Approximate or Partial DOB reported

Project Homeless Connect 2018

Full DOB reported Approximate or Partial DOB reported. Non Hispanic/Non Latino Hispanic/Latino

VHPD HMIS DATA: PROGRAM EXIT FORM

Wilder Foundation Family Supportive Housing Services: ROOF Project

HMIS REQUIRED UNIVERSAL DATA ELEMENTS

HUD-ESG CAPER User Guide

New Hampshire Continua of Care APR Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS (HOPWA) Exit Form for HMIS

HOMELESS PREVENTION PROGRAM APPLICATION

HMIS Data Collection Form for Project EXIT/Annual Review All Projects (Excluding RHY)

All Characteristics Report - Data Entry Form

City of Tucson Housing and Community Development Department Planning and Development Division

Exit Form: Print on Light-Blue Paper

Attachment C. Updated March 23 rd, 2018 by EveryOne Home

2017 Point in Time Count

Summary and Analysis of the Interim ESG Rule December 2011

Common Rental Application for Housing in Vermont

Application for Transitional Housing

Rural Housing, Inc. 1

THDA Homebuyer Education Initiative Customer Intake Form

TABLE OF CONTENTS Applied Survey Research (ASR) All Rights Reserved

CLIENT CHECKLIST HOMELESS PREVENTION FUNDING Requirements That Must Be Met Before An Application Will be Processed

HCSIS Individual Clearance Screen HCSIS Field Name

CoC Annual Performance Report (APR) Guide

In order to process your application, we find it necessary to charge an application fee. The fee is $17 for one adult or $34 for two or more adults.

Common Rental Application for Housing in Vermont. (not for tenant-based vouchers)

ESG CAPER Helper Guide

Minnehaha County 2012 Homeless Count Results

North Dakota Homeless Population Point in Time Survey January 25, 2006

METROPOLITAN HOUSING ACCESS PROGRAM (MHAP) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY MARYLAND

Tri-County Community Council, Inc PO Box 1210 Bonifay, Florida 32425

HUD Annual Performance Report (APR) Programming Specifications

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

Due Date. I have read and understand the changes to the 2010 PATH rept.

BUTTE COUNTYWIDE HOMELESS CONTINUUM OF CARE. Butte County, California Point-In-Time Homeless Census & Survey Report

Rural Housing, Inc. 1

Security Deposit Loan Application 405 SW 6th Street Redmond, Oregon *

CHASE RUN APARTMENTS RENTAL APPLICATION PACKET

METROPOLITAN HOUSING ACCESS PROGRAM (MHAP) FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM APPLICATION DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CITY OF CALISTOGA DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM LOAN APPLICATION

YWCA of NIAGARA of the Niagara Frontier TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROGRAM APPLICATION FOR RESIDENCY Low-income housing tax credit property

50-55 SOUTH ESSEX AVE. ORANGE, NJ 07050

FAMILY NEEDS ASSESSMENT (FY 14-15)

CENTENNIAL VILLAGE APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

2012 Report on the Homeless Populations in Duval, Clay, and Nassau Counties

Updated 01/22/2019 ID 24, Page 1 of 5

Our Mission. Promoting Independence by Providing Car Care

Seek, Test, Treat and Retain for Vulnerable Populations: Data Harmonization Measure

Information about Application Process for Moorhead Public Housing

AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY SENIORS AGE 55 AND OLDER

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT FREE AND REDUCED PRICE SCHOOL MEALS

GLOSSARY HMIS STANDARD REPORTING TERMINOLOGY. A reference guide for methods of selecting clients and data used commonly in HMIS-generated reports

The Reserve at Napa 710 Trancas Street Napa, CA phone/ Fax Senior Apartments For Seniors 62 Years & Older

APPLICATION COVER SHEET

Property Management, Inc.

Continuum of Care Written Standards for NY- 508 Buffalo, Niagara Falls/Erie, Niagara, Orleans, Genesee, Wyoming Counties CoC

HMIS Data Standards DATA DICTIONARY

Massachusetts Application for Health and Dental Coverage and Help Paying Costs

HMIS 320 APR Training

I N S T R U C T I O N S F O R APP L Y I N G

Homeless Management Information System (HMIS)

UTICA PLACE RESIDENTIAL LLC

Dakota County CDA Homebuyer Counseling Program Application

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

Before Starting the Exhibit 1 Continuum of Care (CoC) Application

2014 HMIS Data Dictionary and HMIS Data Manual Summary

Children s HOME Initiative Case Management Program

Housing Eligibility Questionnaire

Transcription:

Sheltered Homeless Persons Louisville/Jefferson County 10/1/2009-9/30/2010 Families Emergency Shelter Families Transitional Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelter Transitional Permanent Supportive Data from the Homeless Management Information System Submitted for the Department of and Urban Development s 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress

Introduction This report on sheltered homeless persons is based on local data submitted to the 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR). The AHAR is a report to the U.S. Congress on the extent and nature of homelessness America, prepared by the Department of and Urban Development (HUD). It provides nationwide estimates of homelessness, cludg formation about the demographic characteristics of homeless persons, service use patterns, and the capacity to house homeless persons. Once published, the 2010 AHAR will be found on HUD s Homeless Resource Exchange (http://www.hudhre.fo) and HUD s Homeless Management Information System portal (www.hmis.fo). The AHAR Local Report is meant to be a resource for stakeholders each community to view their data a variety of user friendly tables and charts. The report is based primarily on Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS) data about homeless persons who used emergency shelter, transitional housg or permanent supportive housg programs durg the 12-month period between Thursday, October 01, 2009 to Thursday, September 30, 2010. The data are collected six categories: Families Emergency Shelter, Emergency Shelter, Families Transitional, Transitional, Families Permanent Supportive and Permanent Supportive All data are based on unduplicated counts, such that each person is counted only once, regardless of how many different programs the person used. Data on length of stay represent the cumulative length of stay for each person with a particular category. For communities that have all emergency shelter, transitional housg and permanent supportive housg providers usg HMIS, the total counts reflect the numbers that those providers reported for the 12 month reportg period. For communities where not all emergency shelter, transitional housg and permanent supportive housg providers are usg HMIS, this report provides estimates of the homeless dividuals and persons families emergency shelter, transitional housg and permanent supportive housg programs. The estimate is an extrapolated count and is based on the assumption that beds located programs that do not participate HMIS are occupied at the same rate and with the same amount of overlap as beds located HMIS-participatg programs. Data were only cluded the national AHAR if HMIS participation rates for a particular category exceeded 50 percent of total beds. The extent to which extrapolated data are representative of the entire community depends on the validity of the assumption that non-participatg programs are similar to participatg programs. Some programs may target specific sub-populations (such as veterans or women), and their clusion or exclusion may skew the overall values particular questions. This report does not clude or purport to extrapolate about persons that are served by victim service providers cludg rape crisis centers, battered women s shelters, domestic violence transitional housg programs, and other programs whose primary mission is to provide services to victims of domestic violence, datg violence, sexual assault, or stalkg. This report also does not clude those who were livg places not meant for human habitation, such as on the street, hotels or motels, or doubled-up livg situations, unless these persons also used emergency shelter or transitional housg. The report cludes the followg sections: The Estimated Homeless Counts durg a One-Year Period table shows the total estimated yearly count for each reportg period, extrapolated pot--time counts, estimated utilization and turnover rates, and estimated counts by household type. Further explanation of the extrapolated counts can be found the Detailed Derivation of Estimated Homeless Counts table. This table explas the steps used to derive the extrapolated counts and cludes both a description and source for where the data comes from. The Year (2010) to Year (2009) Estimated Homeless Counts durg a One-Year Period table shows the percentage change of the 2010 community data compared to 2009 community data. Further explanation of the extrapolated counts can be found the Year (2010) to Year (2009) Detailed Derivation of Estimated Homeless Counts table. The Demographic Characteristics of Sheltered Homeless Persons table provides the percentage of persons reported category by gender of adults, gender of children, ethnicity, race, age, persons by household size, veteran status (adults only) and disability status (adults only). Graphs for each category are below the table. The Prior Livg Situation of Persons Usg Homeless Residential Services table shows the percentage breakdowns of the prior livg situation data each category. The data is categorized by livg arrangement from the night before program entry. Livg arrangements are categorized by homeless situations, housg situations, stitutional settgs, and other settgs. This table also shows the percentage of the stability of the previous night s livg arrangements and the zip code of last permanent address. Graphs for each category are below the table. Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 2

The Length of Stay Emergency Shelter, Transitional and Permanent Supportive for Families and table shows the percentage breakdown of length of stay for dividuals and families emergency shelter, transitional housg and permanent supportive housg. In each category an dividual percentage is given for a specific length of stay as well as a cumulative percentage that show the dividual percentages accrug. A graph comparg the categories is below the table. The Long-Term Stay Demographics: Emergency Shelter Stay of More than 180 Days table provides the demographic percentages of all sheltered homeless persons families, all sheltered persons families who are long-term stayers, all sheltered homeless dividuals, and all sheltered dividuals who are long-term stayers. Demographic formation is given for gender of adults, gender of children, ethnicity, age, persons by household size, veteran status (adults only) and disability status (adults only). Graphs for each category are below the table. 1 Families are defed as any household that cludes at least one adult over 18 years old and one child who is younger than 18 years old. All other persons, cludg those multi-person households consistg of only adults or only children, are reported as sgle dividuals. 2 Other factors, such as nightly counts that far exceeded the reported number of beds the community, may also have caused data to have been excluded from the AHAR. Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 3

Table of Contents Overall Counts Exhibit 1.1 Estimated Homeless Counts durg a One-Year Period (Table) Exhibit 1.2 Detailed Derivation of Estimated Homeless Count (Table) Exhibit 1.3 Estimated Homeless Counts: Pot Time Counts (Graph) Exhibit 1.4 Estimated Homeless Counts: Number of Families (Graph) Exhibit 1.5 Estimated Homeless Counts: Estimated Average Utilization Rate (Graph) Exhibit 1.6 Estimated Homeless Counts: Turnover Rate (Graph) Exhibit 1.7 Estimated Homeless Counts: Families Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 1.8 Estimated Homeless Counts: Families Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 1.9 Estimated Homeless Counts: Families Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 1.10 Estimated Homeless Counts: Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 1.11 Estimated Homeless Counts: Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 1.12 Estimated Homeless Counts: Permanent Supportive (Graph) Demographics Exhibit 3.1 Demographic Characteristics of Sheltered Homeless Persons (Table) Exhibit 3.2 Demographic Characteristics: Gender of Adults (Graph) Exhibit 3.3 Demographic Characteristics: Gender of Children (Graph) Exhibit 3.4 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Families Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.5 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Families Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.6 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Families Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.7 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.8 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.9 Demographic Characteristics: Race of Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.10 Demographic Characteristics: Race (Graph) Exhibit 3.11 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Families Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.12 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Families Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.13 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Families Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.14 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.15 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.16 Demographic Characteristics: Age of Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.17 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Families Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.18 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Families Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.19 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Families Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.20 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 3.21 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 3.22 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size: Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 3.23 Demographic Characteristics: Persons by Household Size (Graph) '> Exhibit 3.24 Demographic Characteristics: Veteran Status (Adults Only) (Graph) Exhibit 3.25 Demographic Characteristics: Disabled (Adults Only) (Graph) Prior Livg Situation Exhibit 4.1 Prior Livg Situation of Persons Usg Homeless Residential Services (Table) Exhibit 4.2 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Families Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 4.3 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Families Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 4.4 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Families Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 4.5 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Emergency Shelter (Graph) Exhibit 4.6 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Transitional (Graph) Exhibit 4.7 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry: Permanent Supportive (Graph) Exhibit 4.8 Prior Livg Situation: Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry (Graph) Exhibit 4.9 Stability of Previous Night s Livg Arrangement (Graph) Exhibit 4.10 Zip Code of Last Permanent Address (Graph) Length of Stay Exhibit 5.1 Length of Stay Emergency Shelter and Transitional for Families and (Table) Exhibit 5.2 Length of Stay (Graph) Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 4

Long-Term Stayers Emergency Shelter Exhibit 6.1 Long-Term Stay Demographic Characteristics: Emergency Shelter Stay of More Than 180 Days (Table) Exhibit 6.2 Long-Term Stay: Gender of Adults (Graph) '> Exhibit 6.3 Long-Term Stay: Gender of Children (Graph) Exhibit 6.4 Long-Term Stay: Race: Percentage of All Sheltered Homeless Families (Graph) Exhibit 6.5 Long-Term Stay: Race: Percentage of All Families Who are Long Stayers (Graph) Exhibit 6.6 Long-Term Stay: Race: Percentage of All Sheltered Homeless (Graph) Exhibit 6.7 Long-Term Stay: Race: Percentage of All Who are Long Stayers (Graph) Exhibit 6.8 Long-Term Stay: Age (Graph) Exhibit 6.9 Long-Term Stay: Persons by Household Size (Graph) '> Exhibit 6.10 Long-Term Stay: Veteran Status (Adults Only) (Graph) Exhibit 6.11 Long-Term Stay: Disabled (Adults Only) (Graph) Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 5

Exhibit 1.1 Estimated Homeless Counts durg a One-Year Period 1 Reportg Year: 10/1/2009-9/30/2010 Site: Louisville/Jefferson County Families Emergency Shelters Families Transitional Total Estimated Yearly Count 2 Families Permanent Supportive ** Emergency Shelters** Transitional Permanent Supportive Estimated Total Number of Homeless Persons Across Reportg Categories * Estimated Total Count for Period 772 374 783 742 2,671 Estimated Total on an Average Night On a sgle night... Pot--Time Counts 3 131 178 265 615 1,189 October 2009 80 187 247 656 1,170 January 2010 133 149 266 635 1,183 April 2010 130 167 274 615 1,186 July 2010 179 142 270 585 1,176 1 year count (October 1- September 30) Pot--Time Counts 5 246 127 October 29, 2009 23 62 January 28, 2010 44 52 April 29, 2010 34 56 July 29, 2010 52 52 Number of Families 4 Estimated Utilization and Turnover Rates Estimated Average Utilization Rate 6 100% 98% 92% 100% Turnover Rate 7 5.89 2.07 2.73 1.20 Estimated Counts by Household Type 8 Individual adult male 469 482 Individual adult female 305 231 Adult family, with child(ren) 288 141 Children families, with adults 483 233 Households with only adults 5 28 Households with only children 0 0 Unaccompanied youth 2 0 Missg this formation 0 0 1 1 Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 6

Exhibit 1.2 Detailed Derivation of Estimated Homeless Count 1 Reportg Year: 10/1/2009-9/30/2010 Site: Louisville/Jefferson County Step Description Source 1 2 3 4 5 Unduplicated number of persons participatg HMIS Number of emergency, year-round equivalent beds HMIS (i.e., bed capacity for participatg providers) Average number of clients served per bed Number of year-round equivalent beds for not participatg HMIS (i.e., bed capacity for nonparticipatg providers) Estimated unduplicated number of persons served by providers that do not participate HMIS Estimated number of persons served by participatg and nonparticipatg Providers. Note that this estimate double HMIS data from providers that participate HMIS SuperNOFA Inventory Chart Step 1 Step 2 SuperNOFA Inventory Chart Step 3 x Step 4 Families Emergency Shelters Families Transitional Families Permanent Supportive ** Emergency Shelters** Transitional Permanent Supportive 672 374 654 643 Persons 114 181 240 534 Beds 5.89 2.07 2.73 1.20 Persons per Bed 17 0 48 83 Beds 100 0 131 100 Persons Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 7

6 7 8 9 10 counts people who use participatg and nonparticipatg providers. This double count will be elimated by the overlap adjustment below. Overlap factor is the square of [(Bed capacity for HMIS nonparticipatg providers)/ (Bed capacity for HMIS participatg providers)] Number of persons who used more than one HMIS participatg provider the category Estimated number of persons families that used both participatg and nonparticipatg providers Total estimate of number persons that used either HMIS participatg or nonparticipatg Emergency Shelter Step 1 + Step 5 (Step 4 Step 2) x (Step 4 Step 2) HMIS data from providers that participate HMIS Step 7 x Step 8 Step 6 Step 9 772 374 785 743 Persons 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.02 is overlap factor 28 7 39 36 Persons 1 0 2 1 is overlap (cross-over) adjustment 772 374 783 742 Persons Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 8

Step Description Source 11 12 13 Extrapolation Factor for nonparticipatg providers: This is the factor applied to calculations that are based only on Step 10 participatg Step 1 providers. It is used to estimate total number of persons served by participatg and nonparticipatg providers. HMIS bed coverage rate Step 2 (Step 2 + Step 4) Pot-In-Time Extrapolation Factor. This is the factor applied to calculations that are based only on participatg providers. It is used to estimate total number of persons served by participatg and nonparticipatg Step 6 Step 1 providers for values that report Pot-time numbers. In contrast to the standard Extrapolation Factor, the pot--time Extrapolation fact does not clude an adjustment for Families Emergency Shelters Families Transitional Families Permanent Supportive ** Emergency Shelters** Transitional Permanent Supportive 1.1482 1.0000 1.1976 1.1541 87% 100% 83% 87% 1.1491 1.0000 1.2000 1.1554 is the extrapolation factor for nonparticipatg providers. % of beds participatg the HMIS is the extrapolation factor for pot-time counts. Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 9

persons usg multiple providers. 1 This reports provides estimates of the homeless dividuals and persons families Emergency Shelter and transitional housg programs that participate HMIS, as well as those that do not participate HMIS. The estimate is an extrapolated count and is based on the assumption that beds located programs that do not participate HMIS are occupied at the same rate as beds located HMIS-participatg programs. The complete derivation of the total extrapolation factors is detailed the next table. Addg values across categories will double count persons who appeared multiple types of programs. The estimates do not clude persons that are served by "victim service providers," cludg rape crisis centers, battered women's shelters, domestic violence transitional housg programs, and other programs whose primary mission is to provide services to victims of domestic violence, datg violence, sexual assault, or stalkg. 2 These results are generated by multiplyg the HMIS data by the Extrapolation Factor (Step 11, table 2.) 3 These values are generated by multiplyg the HMIS data by the Pot-In-Time Extrapolation Factor (Step 13, table 2.) 4 These results are generated by multiplyg the HMIS data by the Extrapolation Factor (Step 11, table 2.) 5 These values are generated by multiplyg the HMIS data by the Pot-In-Time Extrapolation Factor (Step 13, table 2.) 6 These results are generated by dividg the HMIS data on persons on an average night by the total beds HMIS. 7 These results represent the average number of people who use each bed. It is generated by dividg the unduplicated count of persons recorded HMIS, by the total number of beds HMIS 8 These results are generated by multiplyg the HMIS data by the Extrapolation Factor (Step 11, table 2). * This value is generated by multiplyg the sum of the extrpolated number of persons each category by an overlap factor, which accounts for persons who use multiple categories. This value is based on the overlap rates among participatg programs and adjusted to account for possible overlap non-participatg providers. In this site the adjustment factor is: For the PIT. These values are generated by addg the pot time counts across categories. It is assumed that persons do not appear multiple programs on the same night. Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 10

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 11

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 12

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 13

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 14

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 15

Exhibit 3.1 Demographic Characteristics of Sheltered Homeless Persons Reportg Year: 10/1/2009-9/30/2010 Site: Louisville/Jefferson County Characteristics Number of Sheltered Homeless Families Emergency Shelters Families Transitional Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelters Transitional Permanent Supportive Persons 1 672 374 371 2,167 654 643 Number of Sheltered Adults 2 251 141 143 1,689 652 643 Number of Sheltered Children 421 233 227 478 2 0 Gender of Adults Female 82% 88% 90% 16% 40% 33% Male 18% 12% 10% 81% 60% 67% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% Gender of Children Female 48% 50% 52% 55% 0% Male 52% 50% 48% 45% 100% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Ethnicity Race Non-Hispanic/non-Lato 95% 94% 96% 94% 93% 98% Hispanic/Lato 5% 6% 3% 2% 2% 2% Unknown 0% 0% 1% 4% 6% 0% White, non-hispanic/non-lato 29% 26% 40% 43% 48% 39% White, Hispanic/Lato 1% 3% 0% 1% 0% 1% Black or African American 55% 53% 42% 44% 34% 51% Asian 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% American Indian or Alaska Native 1% 2% 0% 1% 0% 1% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander Age 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Several races 8% 15% 11% 5% 17% 7% Unknown 5% 2% 7% 6% 1% 1% Under 1 9% 12% 8% 0% 0% 0% 1 to 5 25% 26% 22% 1% 0% 0% 6 to 12 22% 17% 20% 2% 0% 0% 13 to 17 6% 7% 11% 19% 0% 0% 18 to 30 22% 23% 19% 13% 24% 17% 31 to 50 14% 14% 18% 40% 47% 51% 51 to 61 1% 1% 1% 19% 25% 27% 62 and older 0% 0% 0% 3% 3% 5% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 3% 1% 0% Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 16

Characteristics Persons by Household Size Families Emergency Shelters Families Transitional Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelters Transitional Permanent Supportive 1 person 0% 0% 0% 100% 99% 97% 2 persons 25% 32% 34% 0% 1% 3% 3 persons 29% 31% 26% 0% 0% 0% 4 persons 17% 18% 18% 0% 0% 0% 5 or more persons 28% 19% 22% 0% 0% 0% Unknown 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% Veteran (adults only) Yes 5% 4% 1% 15% 42% 13% No 94% 96% 95% 77% 55% 83% Unknown 1% 0% 3% 8% 3% 5% Disabled (adults only) Yes 21% 33% 76% 49% 66% 88% No 76% 64% 15% 33% 18% 6% Unknown 3% 4% 9% 19% 16% 6% 1 This is the number of sheltered homeless persons from your community's raw data. These numbers do not clude persons that are served by "victim service providers," cludg rape crisis centers, battered women's shelters, domestic violence transitional housg programs, and other programs whose primary mission is to provide services to victims of domestic violence, datg violence, sexual assault, or stalkg. 2 This is the number of sheltered homeless adults from your community's raw data. These numbers do not clude persons that are served by "victim service providers," cludg rape crisis centers, battered women's shelters, domestic violence transitional housg programs, and other programs whose primary mission is to provide services to victims of domestic violence, datg violence, sexual assault, or stalkg. Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 17

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 18

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 19

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 20

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 21

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 22

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 23

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 24

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 25

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 26

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 27

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 28

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 29

Exhibit 4.1 Prior Livg Situation of Persons Usg Homeless Residential Services Reportg Year: 10/1/2009-9/30/2010 Site: Louisville/Jefferson County Prior Livg Situation Families Emergency Shelters Families Transitional Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelters Transitional Permanent Supportive Number of Sheltered Homeless Persons 672 374 371 2,167 654 643 Livg Arrangement the Night before Program Entry Total from Homeless Situation Place not meant for human habitation 2% 6% 7% 4% 3% 9% Emergency shelter 10% 50% 27% 19% 30% 42% Transitional housg 0% 2% 12% 1% 6% 13% Total from Situation Permanent supportive housg 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% Rented housg unit 32% 8% 5% 14% 8% 2% Owned housg unit 2% 0% 1% 2% 2% 0% Stayg with family or friends 41% 22% 9% 33% 15% 8% Total from Institutional Settgs Psychiatric facility 0% 0% 1% 1% 3% 1% Substance abuse treatment center or detox 2% 5% 3% 2% 12% 3% Hospital (non-psychiatric) 0% 0% 1% 0% 2% 1% Jail, prison, or juvenile detention 0% 0% 0% 1% 4% 1% Total from Other Situations Hotel or motel (no voucher) 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% Foster care home 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% Other livg situation 4% 6% 7% 9% 10% 1% Unknown 3% 0% 27% 9% 4% 19% Stability of Previous Night's Livg Arrangements Stayed 1 week or less 14% 14% 5% 16% 19% 6% Stayed more than 1 week, but less than a month 15% 23% 11% 7% 16% 7% Stayed 1 to 3 months 17% 27% 21% 12% 17% 14% Stayed more than 3 months, but less than a year 27% 20% 17% 14% 22% 23% Stayed 1 year or longer 18% 14% 10% 34% 18% 20% Unknown 9% 1% 35% 17% 8% 30% Zip Code of Last Permanent Address Same jurisdiction as program locator 53% 79% 48% 41% 47% 43% Different jurisdiction than program locator 46% 16% 41% 39% 44% 50% Unknown 1% 5% 11% 20% 9% 7% Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 30

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 31

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 32

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 33

Other Situations: Hotel or motel (no voucher), Foster care home, Other livg situation, Unknown Institutional Settgs: Psychiatric facility, Substance abuse treatment center or detox, hospital (non-psychiatric), Jail, prison or juvenile detention Situation: Permanent supportive housg, Rented housg unit, Owned housg unit, Stayg with family or friends Homeless Situation: Place not meant for human habitation, Emergency shelter, Transitional housg Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 34

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 35

Exhibit 4.1 Length of Stay Emergency Shelter and Transitional for Persons Reportg Year: 10/1/2009-9/30/2010 Site: Louisville/Jefferson County Families Emergency Shelters Families Transitional Families Permanent Supportive Emergency Shelters Transitional Permanent Supportive Length of Stay % Cum. % % Cum. % % Cum. % % Cum. % % Cum. % % Cum. % A week or less 13% 13% 1% 1% 0% 0% 44% 44% 5% 5% 0% 0% 1 wk. to 1 month 27% 40% 9% 10% 1% 1% 25% 70% 13% 18% 1% 2% 1-3 months 37% 77% 24% 34% 9% 10% 8% 78% 27% 45% 7% 9% 3-6 months 17% 94% 20% 54% 2% 12% 14% 92% 31% 76% 9% 18% 6-9 months 5% 99% 19% 73% 11% 24% 0% 92% 13% 89% 8% 26% 9-12 months 1% 100% 27% 100% 76% 100% 8% 100% 11% 100% 74% 100% Unknown 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 36

Exhibit 6.1 Long-term Stay Demographic Characteristics: Emergency Shelter Stay of More Than 180 Days Reportg Year: 10/1/2009-9/30/2010 Site: Louisville/Jefferson County Characteristics Percentage of All Sheltered Homeless Families Percentage of All Families Who Are Long-Stayers Percentage of All Sheltered Homeless Percentage of All Who Are Long-Stayers Number of Homeless Persons 672 41 2,167 180 Gender of Adults Female 82% 100% 16% 15% Male 18% 0% 81% 85% Unknown 0% 0% 3% 0% Gender of Children Female 48% 57% 55% 67% Male 52% 43% 45% 33% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 0% Ethnicity Race Age Non-Hispanic/non-Lato 95% 100% 94% 94% Hispanic/Lato 5% 0% 2% 4% Unknown 0% 0% 4% 2% White, non-hispanic/non-lato 29% 17% 43% 39% White, Hispanic/Lato 1% 0% 1% 1% Black or African American 55% 76% 44% 46% Asian 0% 0% 0% 1% American Indian or Alaska Native 1% 0% 1% 1% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 0% 0% 0% 1% Several Races 8% 7% 5% 4% Unknown 5% 0% 6% 8% Under 1 9% 5% 0% 1% 1-5 25% 32% 1% 1% 6-12 22% 29% 2% 1% 13-17 6% 2% 19% 1% 18-30 22% 24% 13% 8% 31-50 14% 7% 40% 56% 51-61 1% 0% 19% 33% 62 and older 0% 3% Unknown 0% 0% 3% 1% Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 37

Characteristics Persons by Household Size Percentage of All Sheltered Homeless Families Percentage of All Families Who Are Long-Stayers Percentage of All Sheltered Homeless Percentage of All Who Are Long-Stayers 1 person 0% 0% 100% 99% 2 persons 25% 24% 0% 1% 3 persons 29% 22% 0% 0% 4 persons 17% 39% 0% 0% 5 or more persons 28% 15% 0% 0% Unknown 0% 0% 0% 0% Number of Homeless Adults 251 13 1,689 174 Veteran (adults only) Yes 5% 0% 15% 16% No 94% 92% 77% 67% Unknown 1% 8% 8% 17% Disabled (adults only) Yes 21% 31% 49% 31% No 76% 54% 33% 34% Unknown 3% 15% 19% 35% Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 38

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 39

Data Submitted for HUD's 2010 Annual Homeless Assessment Report Page: 40