Water Regulation and Pricing RSA EXPERIENCE

Similar documents
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS

HEADING ANALYSIS OF WATER BOARDS

Water Finance and Investment in South Africa

TCTA. Raw Water Resource Infrastructure Model

Area of Service Slides 3-6. Financials : 2009/2010 Financial Year Slides Strategic Objectives 2011/2012 Slides 11-12

BRIEFING PAPER FOR OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE- IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUMMER BUDGET ON THE HOUSING REVENUE ACCOUNT

Financial Review. 1. Introduction. 2. Financial performance

Presentation to Portfolio Committee on CoGTA on debts owed to Eskom and Water Boards

29 March 2012 MBOMBELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY DRAFT 2012/ /2015 ANNUAL BUDGET AND MEDIUM- TERM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK

Compliance Monitor Register of Projects

2016 Division of Revenue Amendment Bill Select and Standing Committees on Apportions

FFC Public Hearings on the LG Fiscal Framework. Comment by SALGA

FUNDING & RESERVES POLICY

Overview of the framework

Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Vol. 550 CapeTown 28 April 2011 No

SETSOTO LOCALL MUNICIPALITY

National Treasury. Modelling the infrastructure investment needs in South African metros: 2016 to FINAL version

Why the Regional Electricity Distributors (REDs) concept is bad for Cape Town

Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. AIDS HELPLINE: Prevention is the cure

THE BUDGET OF DR RUTH SEGOMOTSI MOMPATI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY

Model Concession Agreement for Highways: An Overview

Changing Approaches to Financing and Financial Management in the South African Local Government Sector

The funding of supported accommodation

MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

A study into approaches to minimise the impact of electricity price increases on the poor

ANNEXURE 1. Consultation Paper

2014 Appropriation Bill

Overview of the framework

Portfolio Committee on Energy

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL HOUSING REVENUE ACCOUNT (HRA) REFORM CONSULTATION

PLAN AND MANAGE THE BUDGET POLICY & PROCEDURE MANUAL

Regulatory Impact Statement. Maritime New Zealand Funding Review: Proposal for Consultation Agency Disclosure Statement

Infrastructure Funding & Delivery: A KwaZulu-Natal Case Study

Financial information

Theewaterskloof Municipality

MYPD Methodology Eskom Response to Consultation Paper

uthungulu District Municipality

Overview of the framework

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE HOUSE OF LORDS EUROPEAN UNION COMMITTEE S REPORT ON THE EU SUGAR REGIME

Ensuring The Effective Participation Of Each Sphere Of Government In The Processes And Structures That Determine Intergovernmental Fiscal Arrangements

REVIEW OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT EQUITABLE SHARE FORMULA

Department of Agriculture and Rural Development

2. CRITERIA FOR FUNDING OF EXTENSIONS AND UPGRADES

THE SOUTH AFRICAN ASSOCIATION OF FREIGHT FORWARDERS. Submission to the National Ports Regulator

STEVE TSHWETE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY MP

2015 Division of Revenue Bill Joint meeting of the Standing and Select Committees on Appropriations

CLIMATE FINANCE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENHANCED LOCAL ACTION

Submission to the Federal Tax Discussion Paper. Prepared by the Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA)

Jay Bhagwan Water Research Commission

PROGRESS WITH THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE STRATEGY

A Methodology for the. Valuation of the Regulatory Asset Base

Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Vol. 478 Cape Town 1 April 2005 No

Scheme Financing Infrastructure Projects through the India Infrastructure Finance Company Limited (IIFCL)

NATIONAL ENERGY REGULATOR OF SOUTH AFRICA

Submission by the Telecommunications Carriers Forum on the Telecommunications (TSO, Broadband and Other Matters) Amendment Bill

Advice to the Minister on the Economic Regulatory Framework for the public water services sector in Ireland

ANNEXURE 1. Consultation Paper

Presentation of the TCTA Strategy for 2012 to 2013

Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

HCA Consultation on changes to the Regulatory Framework

Funding Fire and Emergency Services for all New Zealanders PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Composition of the intergovernmental system Alignment between functional and fiscal assignments

Monthly Budget Statement January 2015

FINANCIAL VIABILITY OF MUNICIPALITIES

1 Council Resolution: Item 09/08/26/10.2.1

Financial Analysis INTRODUCTION FINDINGS AND TRENDS PAST FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE. Comparative Financial Statement

Automatic enrolment to workplace pensions

1. Committed Balance - Funding approved as per FIN : Financial Reserves policy to be applied towards specific expenditures.

Logan River Water Supply Scheme

Transnet National Ports Authority Tariff Methodology: Position Paper Ports Regulator: Road Shows March delivering freight reliably

SUBMISSION QUEENSLAND COMPETITION AUTHORITY ASSESSMENT OF PRICING MATTERS FOR BURDEKIN HAUGHTON WATER SUPPLY SCHEME

Mbombela Water Indaba : April 2012

Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs Supplementary Estimate 2011/12 Select Committee Memorandum

SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT. Introduction to the Workshop on SEPA s Regulatory Charging Scheme

Upper Warrell Creek Road Developer Contributions Plan August 2013

MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY BUDGET POLICY

MONTHLY BUDGET SUMMARY

Water and Sewer Utility Rate Studies

Water Services Local Regulation Case Study Report for the City of Cape Town

PART 3 Long Term Financial Plan

15th June, 2012 Statutory Instruments 225 GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBIA. The Information and Communication Technologies Act, 2009 (Act No.

Budget Brief Water and Sanitation

COMMENTS ON STANDARDS OF GENERALLY ACCEPTED MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTING PRACTICE (GAMAP)

PRESENTATION TO SABOA CONFERENCE

Finance Committee. Inquiry into methods of funding capital investment projects. Submission from PPP Forum

Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development

2010/2011 Annual Report 2010/2011 Financial Statements 2012/13 Tariffs and 2012/13 Strategy

WORKING DRAFT. Jan Hlavsa Yannis Arvanitis. Office of Chief Economist, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

No.21 Rural Electrification 1

GUIDELINE DOCUMENT TO MUNICIPALITIES ON THE DESIGN OF A DOMESTIC INCLINING BLOCK RATE TARIFF

This Regulatory Impact Statement has been prepared by the Ministry for the Environment.

The primary purpose of the International Comparison Program (ICP) is to provide the purchasing

THE TRADE-OFFS BETWEEN PRO-POOR AND COST- REFLECTIVE TARIFFS IN SOUTH AFRICA: A REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE

DIVISION OF REVENUE TO PROVINCES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Overall the position shows a surplus of 13,816 for 2018/19 which is recommended to be transferred to the general reserve.

RESPONSIBLE MINISTER FOR INLAND REVENUE DEPARTMENT: Minister of Revenue

Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry

Provincial Review 2016: KwaZulu-Natal

4/7/2015. Group. Governance and Legislation

Project Appraisal and Selection

Transcription:

Water Regulation and Pricing RSA EXPERIENCE Presenter: Avril Halstead Chief Director, National Treasury 26 June 2014

Outline Water Sector Value Chain Financial framework Framework for economic regulation Pricing framework Recommendations Concluding remarks 1

Water Sector Value Chain RAW BULK RETAIL The water sector value chain consists 3 main stages: Water resources management this relates to raw or untreated water Bulk water services; and Retail water services. 3 3

Financial framework (1/3) Main restributive mechanisms in the water sector: Subsidies for infrastructure investment for basic municipal services are provided by national government through the municipal infrastructure grant (MIG) as well as various other capital grants. Subsidies for operating costs provided through local government equitable share as well as various other temporary grants 4

Financial framework (2/3) - transfers available for water and sanitation in 2013/14 USDG R9 billion (mainly for providing serviced land - including water and sanitation) Municipal Water Infrastructure Grant R603 million Water Services Operating Subsidy R560 million MIG R14.4 billion (over R7 billion for water and sanitation) Rural Households Infrastructure Grant R107 million Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant R3.2 billion (indirect grant) R16.1 billion in operations and maintenance funding for W&S in the Local Government Equitable Share (Not to scale) 5

Financial framework (3/3) Financing Raising of up-front cash to build the infrastructure Repaying Source of repayment of the investment and O&M over time On budget Fiscal allocation from budget DWA constructs a new dam PRASA buys rolling stock Off budget SOE s or PPP s use internal reserves or raise debt Transnet raises debt during a road show A PPP / SPV raises debt for a water treatment facility Tax Payers Annual fiscal allocations Users User charges, fees or levies Hybrid solutions are possible DoT subsidises O&M from PRASA Muni pays a unitary payment to the water treatment PPP Transnet charges port fees Muni bills residents (subsidised) water charges The challenge is not financing infrastructure, but repaying it! 6

Framework for economic regulation (1/2) Formal economic regulation of water tariffs has been absent. Self regulation evident with institutions setting and regulating themselves. The two fundamental arguments for economic regulation in the water sector are: Market failure: The water services industry (bulk water supply and distribution) are natural monopolies in most circumstances. Natural monopolies need to be regulated to protect public interest. Monopolies tend to have few incentives to invest or operate efficiently. Public interest: Water is a public good (arguably?) thus government is required to ensure that public interests is protected through the regulation of investment and pricing decisions. Historically, regulation of the water sector has focussed on the technical and environmental aspects of water services but little attention has been been given to economic regulation to date. 7

Framework for economic regulation (2/2) Although DWA has opted to set up an economic regulator as an internal departmental component, National Treasury s preference would have been for an external regulator, at arms length from government as this would help to ensure regulatory principles of: Fair representation of key stakeholders: The interests of all stakeholders must be adequately and fairly heard - conflict of interest is minimised. Simplicity: the regulatory regime adopted by the regulator needs to be effective but simple to understand and implement Integrity: The decisions of the regulator need to reflect an appropriate balance between the needs of consumers and the financial sustainability of the industry. Accountability: The regulator should be accountable to government and to the public for its decisions. Institutional clarity: The regulatory framework should define and identify the relevant stakeholders, their roles and relationships. Effectiveness: Regulators can set targets for improved efficiency and better service, but such targets are meaningless if they cannot be enforced and compliance thereof must be monitored. Capacity to fulfil functions: The effectiveness of the institutional framework will also depend critically on the capacity of institutions including the regulator to fulfil their functions. 8

Pricing framework (1/6) The final charges paid by water service end-users incorporate a number of different elements. Broadly speaking the prices involved in the water value chain are: Water resource prices apply to water supplied by government water schemes and other water management institutions which include catchment management agencies and water user associations. evidence suggests that charges are still below full cost recovery DWA is both price setter and regulator (for its own schemes) Bulk water tariffs prices for bulk water provided by water boards are set by water boards, and gazetted in Parliament by the Minister of Water Affairs. price setting process is guided by the MFMA which stipulates consultation with local government. Water boards must also submit their proposals to National Treasury and SALGA for comments. no explicit policies exist although there is a tariff setting guideline which has been developed by DWA. water boards are under increasing pressure to maintain below inflation increases, whereas in reality, their own internal product inflation has consistently been above CPI. it is worth noting that prices for bulk water provided by Water Services Authorities (WSAs) are not formally regulated, e.g. in the case where City of Cape Town provides Drakenstein municipality with bulk treated water. Water services tariffs (retail prices) pressure to constrain charges increases below inflation has resulted in final charges being progressively limited to below full cost recovery level price setting is largely self regulated but principally municipalities should charge cost-reflective tariffs for the supply of water local government is granted substantial own revenue raising powers in the Constitution funds from national revenues are needed to fund the delivery of services to poor households through a mixture of equitable share and conditional grant funds 9

Pricing framework (2/6) Prices vary due to differences in underlying cost structures. This is expected because the cost of supply water varies depending on local and regional conditions. To what extend do cost structures vary due to differing efficiencies? An example is the variance in bulk water tariff costs 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 2014/15 Water Board Tariff breakdown R/kl - Amatola Bloem Botshelo BBR Lepelle Magalies Mhlathuz Overberg Pelladrift Rand Sedibeng Umgeni e Bad debts 0.09 - - - 0.41 - - - - - - - No data - 3.42 Capital and/or Surplus Portion 1.71 0.19 0.19 0.51 1.06 0.31 0.32 0.03-0.07 0.80 1.30 Finance Expense 1.10 0.29-0.00 - - 0.08 - - - 0.17 0.13 Other costs 1.06 0.79 0.70 1.06 0.07 1.39 0.26 5.74-0.37 0.72 0.71 Repairs & Maintenance 0.77 0.17 0.55 0.48 0.17 0.14 0.13 - - 0.33 0.25 0.40 Depreciation & Amortisation 0.31 0.65-0.08 0.35 0.27 0.64 0.16-0.23-0.34 Chemicals 0.27 0.21 0.32 0.37 0.08 0.26 0.18 - - 0.22 0.31 0.15 Energy 0.70 0.89 0.97 0.39 1.06 0.95 0.41 - - 1.15 1.24 0.33 Staff Costs 1.26 1.54 1.02 1.24 0.63 0.54 0.72 - - 1.02 1.70 0.87 Raw Water 1.66 0.32 2.30 0.49 0.39 0.93 0.59 0.21-2.57 2.71 10 0.97

Pricing framework (3/6) In terms of raw water pricing, DWA s current raw water pricing strategy includes price caps and exemptions to the irrigation sector. This is one contributing factor to the Department s under recovery of expenses for operating, maintaining and refurbishing water sector assets across the country. In 2011, National Treasury briefly researched the implications of removing water price caps and exemptions and possible recommendations to feed in to DWA s review of the Water Pricing Strategy.

Pricing framework (4/6) International experience: Pricing water for irrigation is closely related to political economy and historical development of the agricultural sector. Whilst the concept of full cost recovery is endorsed there is no clear international practice as to what this means for irrigation with regards to water resource management charges and capital portion of infrastructure charges. 12

Pricing framework (5/6) Historical political imperatives and poor planning means we have infrastructure today that is not economically viable and would not be rebuilt. Thus using replacement values as an indicator of asset value may be inappropriate as these are sunk costs. Historically infrastructure developed for white commercial farmers. These schemes frequently have lower capital costs compared to newer scheme s developed for domestic, industrial users and schemes in previously underdeveloped areas. There is little coherence in the approach to funding and subsiding irrigation infrastructure. Both DWA and DoAgriculture have responsibility for management and financing or irrigation infrastructure. Poor maintenance, insufficient refurbishment and inadequate ring-fencing of budgets has led to a significant national refurbishment backlog, placing additional pressure on current budgets. 13

Pricing framework (6/6) Consequences in the current system: There is under-billing of actual costs due to tariff capping, however the underrecovery is uneven across the country While all of the under-billing is related to the cap (on annual increases), the reasons and implication differ between regions At some future date there will not be enough funding for refurbishment which will mean that schemes will either not be properly maintained and fall apart or government will have to intervene and refurbish them at a cost to the state. 14

Recommendations Principles to guide water pricing: Transparency: the need for users to know what they are paying for and how the price was determined. It is key for successful subsidisation- knowing what you are subsidising and for whom. Transparency calls for a clear policy; simple calculation; and defensible charges. Coherence: and consistency between the different charges, in applying the charges and implementing the policy. Predictability: to be able to project prices with relative certainty provides stability to users, allows for better planning, multi-year charge determination. Financial Sustainability: cost recovery, subsidisation, financial management, NWRIA?? Affordability: business viability, political imperatives (e.g. water for resource poor farmers). Where water is unaffordable for some users at a given charge, either economic imperatives should drive a change in water use to a higher value crop or broader sociopolitical imperatives may indicate that a subsidy is required. Affordability should not constrain the prices relating to cost recovery but rather be addressed through a transparent and coherent subsidy regime. Efficiency: of water use, economic and financial resources. Can be driven by regulatory mechanisms, water markets, and institutional efficiency. 15

Concluding remarks National Treasury aims to promote economic development, good governance, social progress and rising living standards through accountable, economic, efficient, equitable and sustainable management of South Africa s public finance. In terms of raw water pricing, the pricing strategy is seen as a process that evolves over time and aims at achieving, in a coherent manner the efficient and cost effective allocation of water, and also taking into account equity and fairness in the allocation mechanism and the long term sustainability of the natural environment. 16

Thank you 17

ADDITIONAL SLIDES 18

Overview of other water services conditional grants (1 of 2) The Municipal Infrastructure Grant includes R7.1 billion for water and sanitation. The formula used to allocate these funds has been updated with backlog data from the 2011 Census, so more funds will go to areas with larger backlogs. (Grant administered by the Department of Cooperative Governance) The Urban Settlements Development Grant funds informal settlement upgrading, this includes provision of an integrated set of services including water and sanitation. (Grant administered by the Department of Human Settlements) The Rural Households Infrastructure Grant has been rescheduled as a direct transfer to municipalities. This will create better alignment between the construction and maintenance of infrastructure, as well as strengthen community consultation. This change should improve the performance of the grant. (Grant administered by the Department of Human Settlements) 19

Overview of other water services conditional grants (2 of 2) The Water Services Operating Subsidy funds water service authorities currently or previously managed directly by the Department of Water Affairs. The Department is to submit a report on the grant s performance since inception to National Treasury by 29 June 2013. The Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant is an indirect grant through which the department builds bulk distribution infrastructure on behalf of municipalities. The performance and structure of this grant will be considered as part of a wider review of local government infrastructure grants. 20

Types of water related charges Infrastructure management (tariff regime) Capital Operation & maintenance Water resources management (user charge) Policy & national strategic functions Local operational functions Behaviour management (directed tax/levy) efficiency (pricing/disincentive) discharge (externalities/polluter pays)

Additional slides Infrastructure charge components Operation Maintenance charge Depreciation Charge Return on Assets and To cover the direct and indirect costs associated with administering, operating and maintaining the scheme To cover typical refurbishment costs To cover the social opportunity cost of capital to government for publicly funded infrastructure, to be used for augmentation planning studies, new schemes or betterments of existing schemes for social purposes or dam safety Estimated through the annual budget process Estimated on a straight line basis on the depreciable portion of the current asset value over its total useful life. Estimated as a percentage of the depreciated replacement value (currently 4%) Increases are capped at CPI plus 10%. 2012/13 shortfall estimated at R180 mil Increases are capped at CPI plus 10%. 2012/13 shortfall estimated at R100 mil Not charged to Agriculture 22

Additional slides Water resources management charge components WRM charge applies to consumptive use, stream flow reduction activities (forestry) and also waste discharge related users. The principle is for all users who benefit from the functions are paying, ensuring there is no cross-subsidisation between different users. WRM Charge To recover direct governance related costs of WRM Users are charged a unit charge per function from which they benefit by the volume: urbanindustrial users typically attract charges on their monitored use and irrigation attracting charges based on their registered use. Increases are capped at CPI plus 1.5c/m 3. Estimated shortfall at R90 million per annum (assumptions unclear though). 23